home.social

#institution — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #institution, aggregated by home.social.

  1. europesays.com/africa/206684/ Plug and Play partners with the Nigerian Institution of Marine Engineers and Naval Architects to elevate Nigeria’s maritime ecosystem #and #architects #elevate #engineers #Institution #marine #naval #Nigeria #Nigerian #of #partners #Play #Plug #the #to #with

  2. 📢 CHASSE AUX PAUVRES PAR MAËL DE CALAN : SOUTIEN À LA LUTTE DES ALLOCATAIRES DU RSA EN FINISTÈRE !

    Révolution Permanente Brest soutient pleinement le combat des six allocataires du RSA qui, avec la CGT, assignent en justice le président du conseil départemental du Finistère, Maël de Calan, au motif de « harcèlement moral institutionnel ».

    1/5

    #Brest #Finistère #RSA #CGT #harcelement #institution #maeldecalan #deCalan #Calan #chomage #pauvrete #precarite #controle #FranceTravail #Bretagne

  3. The Funeral of Handwriting: What We Lose When the Hand Stops Moving

    In 2010, the Common Core State Standards Initiative dropped cursive instruction from its recommended curriculum. The decision arrived without ceremony. No public debate, no period of mourning, no recognition that a cognitive practice stretching back to the Sumerian reed stylus was being retired from American education. Forty-one states adopted the standards. Cursive, along with its slower sibling manuscript handwriting, began its institutional death.

    The loss registers first in the brain. Karin James, a cognitive neuroscientist at Indiana University, published research in 2012 demonstrating that children who practiced letter formation by hand showed activation in the left fusiform gyrus, the reading circuit of the brain, that children who typed the same letters did not. The hand, moving across the page, recruits neural networks that the keyboard bypasses entirely. Virginia Berninger’s longitudinal studies at the University of Washington reinforced this finding: children who wrote by hand produced more words, generated ideas faster, and composed more complete sentences than those who typed. The hand thinks its way through language.

    The argument here has nothing to do with sentiment about fountain pens and wax seals. The motor act of forming letters creates a proprioceptive feedback loop that anchors memory and comprehension in ways that tapping a glass screen cannot replicate. A 2014 study by Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer, published in Psychological Science under the title “The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard,” showed that students who took longhand notes outperformed laptop note-takers on conceptual questions, even when the laptop group had more recorded material. Speed worked against understanding. The hand’s slowness forced selection, compression, and interpretation in real time, while the keyboard encouraged transcription without cognition.

    The cultural history tells a parallel story. In the nineteenth century, Platt Rogers Spencer developed the Spencerian method, a system of penmanship that became the standard American hand from the 1850s through the turn of the century. Spencer did not conceive of handwriting as a mechanical skill. He understood it as moral training. The discipline of forming graceful, consistent letterforms was a discipline of the self: patience, attention, proportion, restraint. When Austin Norman Palmer replaced Spencerian script with his own method around 1900, he stripped the moral philosophy but kept the premise that handwriting shaped character. Both men would have found the idea of abandoning handwriting instruction incomprehensible, the equivalent of canceling arithmetic because calculators exist.

    The legal and institutional architecture of Western civilization was built on the handwritten document. Wills, contracts, treaties, confessions, correspondence, medical notes, field observations, laboratory records: for centuries, the handwritten text carried an evidentiary weight that print could not match. A signature functions as an assertion of identity and intention, a mark that forensic examiners can trace to a single human hand. The typed name carries no such specificity. As handwriting recedes from common practice, an entire system of authentication rooted in the irreducible individuality of the body recedes with it.

    The counterargument writes itself: nobody needs cursive to function in a digital economy. Keyboards are faster. Screens are ubiquitous. Communication has moved to platforms where handwriting has no utility. All of this is true, and all of it misses the point. Efficiency has never been the right lens for evaluating a cognitive practice. Running is less efficient than driving; we do not therefore recommend the abolition of legs.

    What is happening is a form of cognitive amputation performed in the name of convenience. The connection between the hand and the brain’s language centers, between the body and the act of composition, between the slow, resistant, physical work of making meaning and the frictionless digital surface that asks nothing of us but a tap, is being severed by policy and indifference. The children who will never learn cursive will still read and write. They will compose texts and emails and reports. What they will lack is the knowledge of what they are missing, which is the particular cruelty of amputation: the phantom limb aches, but only if you once had the limb.

    A growing number of American states have passed legislation mandating cursive instruction, swimming against the Common Core current. Louisiana’s Act 300 in 2016 was among the earliest. These legislative acts respond to accumulating evidence that the hand’s retirement has consequences the brain cannot absorb on its own. The neuroscience keeps arriving, and it keeps pointing in the same direction: the hand and the mind developed together, over millennia, and separating them carries costs that no efficiency calculation can account for.

    The funeral of handwriting is the funeral of a particular kind of thinking: slow, embodied, resistant to acceleration, irreducibly personal. Every word written by hand carries the tremor of the individual body, the pressure of the moment, the angle of fatigue or excitement or care. The keyboard produces uniform characters regardless of who strikes the keys. Uniformity offers comfort, and the comfort has a price measured in capacities we can no longer name.

    #commonCore #composition #cursive #education #handwriting #institution #pen #penmanship #research #states
  4. The Funeral of Handwriting: What We Lose When the Hand Stops Moving

    In 2010, the Common Core State Standards Initiative dropped cursive instruction from its recommended curriculum. The decision arrived without ceremony. No public debate, no period of mourning, no recognition that a cognitive practice stretching back to the Sumerian reed stylus was being retired from American education. Forty-one states adopted the standards. Cursive, along with its slower sibling manuscript handwriting, began its institutional death.

    The loss registers first in the brain. Karin James, a cognitive neuroscientist at Indiana University, published research in 2012 demonstrating that children who practiced letter formation by hand showed activation in the left fusiform gyrus, the reading circuit of the brain, that children who typed the same letters did not. The hand, moving across the page, recruits neural networks that the keyboard bypasses entirely. Virginia Berninger’s longitudinal studies at the University of Washington reinforced this finding: children who wrote by hand produced more words, generated ideas faster, and composed more complete sentences than those who typed. The hand thinks its way through language.

    The argument here has nothing to do with sentiment about fountain pens and wax seals. The motor act of forming letters creates a proprioceptive feedback loop that anchors memory and comprehension in ways that tapping a glass screen cannot replicate. A 2014 study by Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer, published in Psychological Science under the title “The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard,” showed that students who took longhand notes outperformed laptop note-takers on conceptual questions, even when the laptop group had more recorded material. Speed worked against understanding. The hand’s slowness forced selection, compression, and interpretation in real time, while the keyboard encouraged transcription without cognition.

    The cultural history tells a parallel story. In the nineteenth century, Platt Rogers Spencer developed the Spencerian method, a system of penmanship that became the standard American hand from the 1850s through the turn of the century. Spencer did not conceive of handwriting as a mechanical skill. He understood it as moral training. The discipline of forming graceful, consistent letterforms was a discipline of the self: patience, attention, proportion, restraint. When Austin Norman Palmer replaced Spencerian script with his own method around 1900, he stripped the moral philosophy but kept the premise that handwriting shaped character. Both men would have found the idea of abandoning handwriting instruction incomprehensible, the equivalent of canceling arithmetic because calculators exist.

    The legal and institutional architecture of Western civilization was built on the handwritten document. Wills, contracts, treaties, confessions, correspondence, medical notes, field observations, laboratory records: for centuries, the handwritten text carried an evidentiary weight that print could not match. A signature functions as an assertion of identity and intention, a mark that forensic examiners can trace to a single human hand. The typed name carries no such specificity. As handwriting recedes from common practice, an entire system of authentication rooted in the irreducible individuality of the body recedes with it.

    The counterargument writes itself: nobody needs cursive to function in a digital economy. Keyboards are faster. Screens are ubiquitous. Communication has moved to platforms where handwriting has no utility. All of this is true, and all of it misses the point. Efficiency has never been the right lens for evaluating a cognitive practice. Running is less efficient than driving; we do not therefore recommend the abolition of legs.

    What is happening is a form of cognitive amputation performed in the name of convenience. The connection between the hand and the brain’s language centers, between the body and the act of composition, between the slow, resistant, physical work of making meaning and the frictionless digital surface that asks nothing of us but a tap, is being severed by policy and indifference. The children who will never learn cursive will still read and write. They will compose texts and emails and reports. What they will lack is the knowledge of what they are missing, which is the particular cruelty of amputation: the phantom limb aches, but only if you once had the limb.

    A growing number of American states have passed legislation mandating cursive instruction, swimming against the Common Core current. Louisiana’s Act 300 in 2016 was among the earliest. These legislative acts respond to accumulating evidence that the hand’s retirement has consequences the brain cannot absorb on its own. The neuroscience keeps arriving, and it keeps pointing in the same direction: the hand and the mind developed together, over millennia, and separating them carries costs that no efficiency calculation can account for.

    The funeral of handwriting is the funeral of a particular kind of thinking: slow, embodied, resistant to acceleration, irreducibly personal. Every word written by hand carries the tremor of the individual body, the pressure of the moment, the angle of fatigue or excitement or care. The keyboard produces uniform characters regardless of who strikes the keys. Uniformity offers comfort, and the comfort has a price measured in capacities we can no longer name.

    #commonCore #composition #cursive #education #handwriting #institution #pen #penmanship #research #states
  5. The Funeral of Handwriting: What We Lose When the Hand Stops Moving

    In 2010, the Common Core State Standards Initiative dropped cursive instruction from its recommended curriculum. The decision arrived without ceremony. No public debate, no period of mourning, no recognition that a cognitive practice stretching back to the Sumerian reed stylus was being retired from American education. Forty-one states adopted the standards. Cursive, along with its slower sibling manuscript handwriting, began its institutional death.

    The loss registers first in the brain. Karin James, a cognitive neuroscientist at Indiana University, published research in 2012 demonstrating that children who practiced letter formation by hand showed activation in the left fusiform gyrus, the reading circuit of the brain, that children who typed the same letters did not. The hand, moving across the page, recruits neural networks that the keyboard bypasses entirely. Virginia Berninger’s longitudinal studies at the University of Washington reinforced this finding: children who wrote by hand produced more words, generated ideas faster, and composed more complete sentences than those who typed. The hand thinks its way through language.

    The argument here has nothing to do with sentiment about fountain pens and wax seals. The motor act of forming letters creates a proprioceptive feedback loop that anchors memory and comprehension in ways that tapping a glass screen cannot replicate. A 2014 study by Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer, published in Psychological Science under the title “The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard,” showed that students who took longhand notes outperformed laptop note-takers on conceptual questions, even when the laptop group had more recorded material. Speed worked against understanding. The hand’s slowness forced selection, compression, and interpretation in real time, while the keyboard encouraged transcription without cognition.

    The cultural history tells a parallel story. In the nineteenth century, Platt Rogers Spencer developed the Spencerian method, a system of penmanship that became the standard American hand from the 1850s through the turn of the century. Spencer did not conceive of handwriting as a mechanical skill. He understood it as moral training. The discipline of forming graceful, consistent letterforms was a discipline of the self: patience, attention, proportion, restraint. When Austin Norman Palmer replaced Spencerian script with his own method around 1900, he stripped the moral philosophy but kept the premise that handwriting shaped character. Both men would have found the idea of abandoning handwriting instruction incomprehensible, the equivalent of canceling arithmetic because calculators exist.

    The legal and institutional architecture of Western civilization was built on the handwritten document. Wills, contracts, treaties, confessions, correspondence, medical notes, field observations, laboratory records: for centuries, the handwritten text carried an evidentiary weight that print could not match. A signature functions as an assertion of identity and intention, a mark that forensic examiners can trace to a single human hand. The typed name carries no such specificity. As handwriting recedes from common practice, an entire system of authentication rooted in the irreducible individuality of the body recedes with it.

    The counterargument writes itself: nobody needs cursive to function in a digital economy. Keyboards are faster. Screens are ubiquitous. Communication has moved to platforms where handwriting has no utility. All of this is true, and all of it misses the point. Efficiency has never been the right lens for evaluating a cognitive practice. Running is less efficient than driving; we do not therefore recommend the abolition of legs.

    What is happening is a form of cognitive amputation performed in the name of convenience. The connection between the hand and the brain’s language centers, between the body and the act of composition, between the slow, resistant, physical work of making meaning and the frictionless digital surface that asks nothing of us but a tap, is being severed by policy and indifference. The children who will never learn cursive will still read and write. They will compose texts and emails and reports. What they will lack is the knowledge of what they are missing, which is the particular cruelty of amputation: the phantom limb aches, but only if you once had the limb.

    A growing number of American states have passed legislation mandating cursive instruction, swimming against the Common Core current. Louisiana’s Act 300 in 2016 was among the earliest. These legislative acts respond to accumulating evidence that the hand’s retirement has consequences the brain cannot absorb on its own. The neuroscience keeps arriving, and it keeps pointing in the same direction: the hand and the mind developed together, over millennia, and separating them carries costs that no efficiency calculation can account for.

    The funeral of handwriting is the funeral of a particular kind of thinking: slow, embodied, resistant to acceleration, irreducibly personal. Every word written by hand carries the tremor of the individual body, the pressure of the moment, the angle of fatigue or excitement or care. The keyboard produces uniform characters regardless of who strikes the keys. Uniformity offers comfort, and the comfort has a price measured in capacities we can no longer name.

    #commonCore #composition #cursive #education #handwriting #institution #pen #penmanship #research #states
  6. The Funeral of Handwriting: What We Lose When the Hand Stops Moving

    In 2010, the Common Core State Standards Initiative dropped cursive instruction from its recommended curriculum. The decision arrived without ceremony. No public debate, no period of mourning, no recognition that a cognitive practice stretching back to the Sumerian reed stylus was being retired from American education. Forty-one states adopted the standards. Cursive, along with its slower sibling manuscript handwriting, began its institutional death.

    The loss registers first in the brain. Karin James, a cognitive neuroscientist at Indiana University, published research in 2012 demonstrating that children who practiced letter formation by hand showed activation in the left fusiform gyrus, the reading circuit of the brain, that children who typed the same letters did not. The hand, moving across the page, recruits neural networks that the keyboard bypasses entirely. Virginia Berninger’s longitudinal studies at the University of Washington reinforced this finding: children who wrote by hand produced more words, generated ideas faster, and composed more complete sentences than those who typed. The hand thinks its way through language.

    The argument here has nothing to do with sentiment about fountain pens and wax seals. The motor act of forming letters creates a proprioceptive feedback loop that anchors memory and comprehension in ways that tapping a glass screen cannot replicate. A 2014 study by Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer, published in Psychological Science under the title “The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard,” showed that students who took longhand notes outperformed laptop note-takers on conceptual questions, even when the laptop group had more recorded material. Speed worked against understanding. The hand’s slowness forced selection, compression, and interpretation in real time, while the keyboard encouraged transcription without cognition.

    The cultural history tells a parallel story. In the nineteenth century, Platt Rogers Spencer developed the Spencerian method, a system of penmanship that became the standard American hand from the 1850s through the turn of the century. Spencer did not conceive of handwriting as a mechanical skill. He understood it as moral training. The discipline of forming graceful, consistent letterforms was a discipline of the self: patience, attention, proportion, restraint. When Austin Norman Palmer replaced Spencerian script with his own method around 1900, he stripped the moral philosophy but kept the premise that handwriting shaped character. Both men would have found the idea of abandoning handwriting instruction incomprehensible, the equivalent of canceling arithmetic because calculators exist.

    The legal and institutional architecture of Western civilization was built on the handwritten document. Wills, contracts, treaties, confessions, correspondence, medical notes, field observations, laboratory records: for centuries, the handwritten text carried an evidentiary weight that print could not match. A signature functions as an assertion of identity and intention, a mark that forensic examiners can trace to a single human hand. The typed name carries no such specificity. As handwriting recedes from common practice, an entire system of authentication rooted in the irreducible individuality of the body recedes with it.

    The counterargument writes itself: nobody needs cursive to function in a digital economy. Keyboards are faster. Screens are ubiquitous. Communication has moved to platforms where handwriting has no utility. All of this is true, and all of it misses the point. Efficiency has never been the right lens for evaluating a cognitive practice. Running is less efficient than driving; we do not therefore recommend the abolition of legs.

    What is happening is a form of cognitive amputation performed in the name of convenience. The connection between the hand and the brain’s language centers, between the body and the act of composition, between the slow, resistant, physical work of making meaning and the frictionless digital surface that asks nothing of us but a tap, is being severed by policy and indifference. The children who will never learn cursive will still read and write. They will compose texts and emails and reports. What they will lack is the knowledge of what they are missing, which is the particular cruelty of amputation: the phantom limb aches, but only if you once had the limb.

    A growing number of American states have passed legislation mandating cursive instruction, swimming against the Common Core current. Louisiana’s Act 300 in 2016 was among the earliest. These legislative acts respond to accumulating evidence that the hand’s retirement has consequences the brain cannot absorb on its own. The neuroscience keeps arriving, and it keeps pointing in the same direction: the hand and the mind developed together, over millennia, and separating them carries costs that no efficiency calculation can account for.

    The funeral of handwriting is the funeral of a particular kind of thinking: slow, embodied, resistant to acceleration, irreducibly personal. Every word written by hand carries the tremor of the individual body, the pressure of the moment, the angle of fatigue or excitement or care. The keyboard produces uniform characters regardless of who strikes the keys. Uniformity offers comfort, and the comfort has a price measured in capacities we can no longer name.

    #commonCore #composition #cursive #education #handwriting #institution #pen #penmanship #research #states
  7. Benoît Payan officiellement réinstallé maire de Marseille, Amine Kessaci 4e adjoint

    Réélu, le maire de la cité phocéenne a remis samedi l’écharpe tricolore à Amine Kessaci, le militant antinarcotrafic.…
    #Marseille #FR #France #Actu #News #Europe #EU #actu #Actualités #candidat #candidats #député #députés #europe #gouvernement #institution #institutions #loi #lois #opposition #politique #Provence-Alpes-Côted'Azur #PS #Républiquefrançaise #UMP
    europesays.com/fr/830756/

  8. "1st, #infrastructure is always #shared means, which means that it requires coordination, and 2nd those means are shared to many ends—ideally very open-ended, unpredictable ends so that society may express its greatest creativity—which means that you cannot predict how it will get used and not all uses will be good. Because of this, you can't just regulate and forget: you need an #institution to remain involved in the continued operation of the infrastructure system."
    berjon.com/infrastructure-shoc

  9. Solidarity seems like a noble goal, but it's specious at best. When rallying for a cause, we want solidarity – for others to join – but what if we are among the others? #Solidarity comes at the expense of self – fine if you are already committed. Otherwise, not so much.

    philosophics.blog/2025/12/03/o
    #solidarity #ethics #virtue #commongood #teaching #indotrination #normativity #institution #philosophy #psychology #virtue #dogma #flourishing #boundaries #goodandevil #totalitarianism #morals #principles

  10. #MissUniverse #owners in #Mexico, #Thailand hit with fraud, trafficking claims
    "Miss Universe #beauty #pageant was hit by fresh #scandal days after it ended, with the #Mexican co-owner of te contest accused of #trafficking #drugs & #arms & his #Thai counterpart accused of #fraud. This year's Miss Universe contest concluded last week in Thailand with a win for #MissMexico"
    🤦‍♂️>> This global pageant is no longer a serious #institution & 2025 results questionable. #wasteoftime
    straitstimes.com/world/miss-un

  11. #MissUniverse #owners in #Mexico, #Thailand hit with fraud, trafficking claims
    "Miss Universe #beauty #pageant was hit by fresh #scandal days after it ended, with the #Mexican co-owner of te contest accused of #trafficking #drugs & #arms & his #Thai counterpart accused of #fraud. This year's Miss Universe contest concluded last week in Thailand with a win for #MissMexico"
    🤦‍♂️>> This global pageant is no longer a serious #institution & 2025 results questionable. #wasteoftime
    straitstimes.com/world/miss-un

  12. #MissUniverse #owners in #Mexico, #Thailand hit with fraud, trafficking claims
    "Miss Universe #beauty #pageant was hit by fresh #scandal days after it ended, with the #Mexican co-owner of te contest accused of #trafficking #drugs & #arms & his #Thai counterpart accused of #fraud. This year's Miss Universe contest concluded last week in Thailand with a win for #MissMexico"
    🤦‍♂️>> This global pageant is no longer a serious #institution & 2025 results questionable. #wasteoftime
    straitstimes.com/world/miss-un

  13. #MissUniverse #owners in #Mexico, #Thailand hit with fraud, trafficking claims
    "Miss Universe #beauty #pageant was hit by fresh #scandal days after it ended, with the #Mexican co-owner of te contest accused of #trafficking #drugs & #arms & his #Thai counterpart accused of #fraud. This year's Miss Universe contest concluded last week in Thailand with a win for #MissMexico"
    🤦‍♂️>> This global pageant is no longer a serious #institution & 2025 results questionable. #wasteoftime
    straitstimes.com/world/miss-un

  14. #MissUniverse #owners in #Mexico, #Thailand hit with fraud, trafficking claims
    "Miss Universe #beauty #pageant was hit by fresh #scandal days after it ended, with the #Mexican co-owner of te contest accused of #trafficking #drugs & #arms & his #Thai counterpart accused of #fraud. This year's Miss Universe contest concluded last week in Thailand with a win for #MissMexico"
    🤦‍♂️>> This global pageant is no longer a serious #institution & 2025 results questionable. #wasteoftime
    straitstimes.com/world/miss-un

  15. "Est-ce que cet élève pourrait s'en prendre à moi ?" : cinq ans après l'assassinat de Samuel Paty, les enseignants se sentent "démunis" face aux violences

    Les enseignants abandonnés par l' #institution.
    Présence pour leur demander des services en permanence, absence totale quand ils s'agit d'être à leurs côtés.
    #Classes bondées, #salaires pitoyables (par rapport au niveau d'études),absence totale de soutien de l'institution.

    Vous voulez être #enseignant en #France ?
    franceinfo.fr/faits-divers/ter

  16. #Recht als #Institution reduziere #Unsicherheit und verstetige die #Erwartungshaltung​en, was #Transaktionskosten in einer #Gesellschaft reduziere und ihre #Performance verbessere.

    Wer sich auf diesen #Wettbewerb um #Performance nicht einlässt muss dadurch keinen #Nachteil erfahren, wenn er durch ihn ohnehin #verloren hätte.

    Jürgen #Nautz: Die #Entwicklung des #staatlich​en #Rechtsetzungsmonopol​s in #Europa in: Das #Rechtssystem zwischen #Staat und #Zivilgesellschaft

    #Institutionenökonomik

  17. In der #Ampelkoalition gab es noch den #Aktionsplan zum #Themenkomplex #Wohnungslosigkeit

    Stichwort: #Wohnungslosigkeit überwinden

    Dass die #Institution #Jobcenter & darin die "#Sozialgesetzgebung" #SGBII ein Treiber von #Wohnungslosigkeit ist und zwar aufgrund der Ausgestaltung dieser #Gesetzgebung will eine #SPD natürlich nicht erkennen!

    Unsere SPD - Bundestagsabgeordnete hat mittlerweile den Mail - Kontakt geblockt oder blocken lassen.
    Lediglich 2 Treffen in 2 Jahren wurden gebilligt❗

  18. In der #Ampelkoalition gab es noch den #Aktionsplan zum #Themenkomplex #Wohnungslosigkeit

    Stichwort: #Wohnungslosigkeit überwinden

    Dass die #Institution #Jobcenter & darin die "#Sozialgesetzgebung" #SGBII ein Treiber von #Wohnungslosigkeit ist und zwar aufgrund der Ausgestaltung dieser #Gesetzgebung will eine #SPD natürlich nicht erkennen!

    Unsere SPD - Bundestagsabgeordnete hat mittlerweile den Mail - Kontakt geblockt oder blocken lassen.
    Lediglich 2 Treffen in 2 Jahren wurden gebilligt❗

  19. In der #Ampelkoalition gab es noch den #Aktionsplan zum #Themenkomplex #Wohnungslosigkeit

    Stichwort: #Wohnungslosigkeit überwinden

    Dass die #Institution #Jobcenter & darin die "#Sozialgesetzgebung" #SGBII ein Treiber von #Wohnungslosigkeit ist und zwar aufgrund der Ausgestaltung dieser #Gesetzgebung will eine #SPD natürlich nicht erkennen!

    Unsere SPD - Bundestagsabgeordnete hat mittlerweile den Mail - Kontakt geblockt oder blocken lassen.
    Lediglich 2 Treffen in 2 Jahren wurden gebilligt❗

  20. In der #Ampelkoalition gab es noch den #Aktionsplan zum #Themenkomplex #Wohnungslosigkeit

    Stichwort: #Wohnungslosigkeit überwinden

    Dass die #Institution #Jobcenter & darin die "#Sozialgesetzgebung" #SGBII ein Treiber von #Wohnungslosigkeit ist und zwar aufgrund der Ausgestaltung dieser #Gesetzgebung will eine #SPD natürlich nicht erkennen!

    Unsere SPD - Bundestagsabgeordnete hat mittlerweile den Mail - Kontakt geblockt oder blocken lassen.
    Lediglich 2 Treffen in 2 Jahren wurden gebilligt❗

  21. The funny thing about social constructs is that they bring two distinct meanings of the (extremely problematic) term "objective" into direct conflict.

    Specifically, the meaning of 'objective' that is "existing intrinsically, plainly detectable, clearly segmentable from its immediate environs, etc. etc." and the meaning of 'objective' that is "agreed upon by all members of a group, etc. etc."

    What makes a social construct a construct is that it has no physical particulars, is not plainly detectable, cannot be clearly segmented away from its immediate environs (if it can even be said to have immediate environs), i.e. it is not an 'objectively existing entity', and in fact it's entire existence consists of the 'objective' agreement or objectively held belief that it exists.

    So, that's what humans are like, if you were wondering why things are shit.

    Humans are all about those 'objectively' non-existing 'objective' existences.

    Ugh.

    p.s. in case you were wondering, both those senses of 'objective' are pretty much bollocks.

    #objective #socialConstruct #borders #nation #Institution #law #philosophy @philosophy

  22. A quotation from Truman, Harry S:

    «
    You see the thing you have to remember. When you get to be President, there are all those things, the honors, the twenty-one-gun salutes, all those things. You have to remember it isn’t for you. It’s for the Presidency, and you’ve got to keep yourself separate from that in your mind…
    »

    Full quote, sourcing, notes:
    wist.info/truman-harry-s/33998

    #quote #quotes #quotation #ego #honors #pride #Institution #office #position #presidency #president #pride

  23. Property rights matter!
    In Qing Taiwan the pawning rather than sale of land improved economic efficiency in the presence of weak state capacity by easing land transfer to strangers, according to Shao-yu Jheng, Hui-wen Koo & Kun-jung Wu in the Asia-Pacific EcHR. Open access
    doi.org/10.1111/aehr.12288
    @economics @demography @socialscience @sociology @politicalscience @geography @anthropology @econhist @devecon @sts @SocArXivBot #history #histodons #glamsdons #property #institution #Taiwan #land #Qing

  24. Einrichtung einer #Pflegekammer

    ver.di Baden-Württemberg kritisiert die heute beschlossene Weichenstellung zur Einrichtung einer Pflegekammer durch die #Landesregierung aufs Schärfste.

    Irene Gölz, ver.di Landesfachbereichsleiterin #Gesundheit, #Soziales und #Bildung:
    „Pflegekammern werden nicht eingerichtet, um die Situation der #Pflegefachpersonen zu verbessern, sondern zur #Regulierung ihrer #Berufsausübung. Kammern sind Institutionen für freie Berufe. Pflegefachpersonen sind aber zu 95 Prozent abhängig beschäftigt. Sie haben #Arbeitgeber, darunter auch #Pflegedirektionen, die ihnen genau vorschreiben können, wie sie zu arbeiten haben. Sie brauchen keine zusätzliche #Institution, die ihnen weitere Vorschriften macht und möglicherweise Sanktionen auferlegt. Besonders pikant: dafür müssen die Pflegefachpersonen dann auch noch per #Zwangsbeitrag zur Kammer bezahlen.
    Richtig ist, dass #Pflegekräfte zu wenig Gehör bei der #Politik finden. Denn die Vorschläge, was sich für eine gute Pflege ändern muss, liegen seit Jahren auf dem Tisch. Wenn die Landesregierung #Pflegeberufe aufwerten will, muss sie anfangen, deren #Arbeitsbedingungen endlich nachhaltig zu verbessern. Eine Kammer mit #Zwangsmitgliedschaft ändert hierbei überhaupt nichts und trägt auch nicht dazu bei, die pflegerische #Versorgung der #Bevölkerung sicher zu stellen.“

    Die Landesregierung will eine 60-prozentigen Zustimmung („Quorum“) zur Pflegekammer als Voraussetzung für deren Errichtung.

    Martin Gross, Landesleiter ver.di Baden-Württemberg: „Wer die Errichtung einer Kammer davon abhängig machen will, dass 60 Prozent der betroffenen Pflegefachpersonen dieser zustimmen, muss eine freiwillige Registrierung ermöglichen.“

    Die Landesregierung will die Pflegefachpersonen durch die verpflichtende #Übermittlung ihrer #Daten über ihre Arbeitgeber registrieren. Die Pflegefachpersonen sollen dann lediglich im Nachhinein die Möglichkeit bekommen, dagegen #Einspruch zu erheben.

    „Nach den heftigen Auseinandersetzungen um Pflegekammern in anderen Bundesländern befürchten Landesregierung und #Ministerium wohl, dass sie das #Quorum bei einer freiwilligen Registrierung nicht erreichen. Für eine demokratische #Willensbildung ist #Freiwilligkeit aber entscheidend und kann nicht nur aus einem Widerspruchsrecht bestehen,“ so Gross weiter.

    Quelle: #verdi Baden-Württemberg, 4.4.2023 bawue.verdi.de/presse/pressemi

  25. @naomilawsonjacobs #Older people in #Retirement & #CareHomes can also be treated same #Institutionalising way which gives more power to #Institution, less decision-making to #person. Wouldn't it feel more #Equal #Heartfull #engaging & #Familial to actively participate together when possible as a good #Home works? #Sitting with #brain, #body #empowerment unchallenged/passive cannot be #Healthy? #Compliancy for institutional #efficiency sake shouldn't be goal: #Equality #Democracy in #CareWork