home.social

#psychology — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #psychology, aggregated by home.social.

  1. DATE: October 11, 2026 at 02:00PM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: People who worry more tend to have more negative dreams, study finds

    URL: psypost.org/people-who-worry-m

    Among 389 Italian adults, stress emerged as the most central element in a web of connections linking worry, anxiety and depression, according to a study published in BMC Psychology. People who reported more worry and more depressive symptoms also tended to report more negative dreams, a pattern consistent with the idea that waking concerns carry over into sleep.

    Dreams have long been associated with people’s emotional lives. The continuity hypothesis of dreaming proposes that concerns and feelings from waking life can continue into sleep and influence dream experiences. For example, people under pressure may dream about threatening or emotionally intense events.

    However, it is difficult to determine how different dream experiences relate to different forms of distress. A person may remember dreams frequently without finding them upsetting, while another person may rarely recall dreams but feel strongly affected by the dreams they do remember. Research on dreams and research on worry, which has been linked to poorer sleep, have also largely been conducted separately.

    Vittorio Lenzo of the University of Catania in Italy led a team investigating these relationships. The researchers surveyed 389 Italian-speaking adults recruited through university mailing lists, social media and online blogs. Participants were 18 to 64 years old, with an average age of about 24, and the sample included 330 women, 50 men and nine non-binary participants.

    Participants completed an online survey containing three questionnaires. The Mannheim Dream Questionnaire asked how often people recalled their dreams, how emotionally intense their dreams were, how positive or negative their dreams usually felt, how often dreams affected their daytime mood and how often they told other people about their dreams. Each of these features was measured with a single question.

    The Penn State Worry Questionnaire measured pathological worry, meaning persistent and difficult-to-control thoughts about possible future problems. Participants also completed the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, which measures symptoms related to depression, anxiety and stress.

    Lenzo and colleagues then used network analysis. In this type of analysis, each psychological feature is treated as a point in a network, and the connections between points represent how strongly two features are related after accounting for all the others. This approach can show which variables are most strongly linked to the rest of the network.

    On average, participants reported high levels of worry, enough to be considered clinically elevated compared with normative data. Depression, anxiety and stress formed a closely connected cluster, with the strongest connection between anxiety and stress. Worry was most strongly associated with stress and only weakly with anxiety and depression, which the authors suggest may reflect worry’s role in sustaining prolonged tension.

    Within the dream measures, people who recalled their dreams more often were also more likely to tell others about them, the strongest connection in the entire network. Frequent dream recall was moderately associated with more emotionally intense dreams, which were in turn linked with the feeling that dreams affected daytime mood.

    The links between dreams and distress were weaker. People whose dreams tended to be more negative in tone reported more depressive symptoms and more worry, and people who felt their dreams affected their daytime mood reported more anxiety. The authors note that this pattern fits the continuity hypothesis, since people who worry a great deal may carry that vigilance into sleep.

    Stress was the most central variable in the overall network, meaning it had the strongest total connections to the other variables, while depression, dream recall and dream intensity were among the least central. Dream emotional tone had what researchers call a negative expected influence, meaning its connections to the rest of the network ran mostly in the opposite direction from those of distress.

    The authors concluded that “dream experiences are integrated components of a dynamic system of emotional functioning.” They suggest that more positive dream experiences might help dampen distress, while stress may amplify it. They also propose that worry and depression could lead to more negative dreams, which might in turn feed next-day anxiety, though both ideas require testing in studies that follow people over time.

    There are a few things to keep in mind. Because the data were collected at a single point in time, the study cannot show whether dreams influence distress, whether distress shapes dreams, or both. The participants were a convenience sample of mostly young women recruited online, which limits how far the findings can be generalized.

    All information was self-reported, and dream experiences depend on people’s memories, which may introduce bias. Each dream feature was measured with a single question, the connections between dreams and distress were small, and while the network was generally stable when tested using repeated statistical resampling, some individual connections were less certain.

    The study, “Dream experiences and psychological distress: a network analysis of pathological worry, depression, anxiety, and stress,” was authored by Vittorio Lenzo, Chiara Fioretti, Alessandro Musetti, Raffaele De Luca Picione, Christian Franceschini, Patrizia Strano, Maria C. Quattropani and Alberto Sardella.

    URL: psypost.org/people-who-worry-m

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #DreamsAndDistress #WorryAndDreams #NegativeDreams #ContinuityHypothesis #StressAndDreams #MentalHealthResearch #DreamRecall #EmotionalWellbeing #AnxietyAndSleep #PsychologyStudy

  2. *FUNNY GOD: The Tao of Funny God & The Mind's True Liberation* (2015) by Michael Adzema

    Ch 11, p. 84

    🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

    or read/dwl book on blog: sillymickel.blogspot.com/2021/02/funn...

    4/ 🧵👇💡📚💙 #FnG 🐸☯️ #FnGCH11📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #mythology ☮️ #patriarchy 🧟‍♂️

  3. DATE: October 11, 2026 at 01:00AM
    SOURCE:
    NEW YORK TIMES PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGISTS FEED

    TITLE: Neuroscience Can Make Decluttering Easier

    URL: nytimes.com/2026/10/11/opinion

    Decluttering is a challenge for many Americans, but neuroscience indicates we can make the process easier on ourselves and our loved ones.

    URL: nytimes.com/2026/10/11/opinion

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Neuroscience #Decluttering #BrainSci #Habits #MindfulLiving #ProductivityTips #Minimalism #SelfImprovement #BehavioralScience #OrganizeYourLife

  4. We who lived in concentration camps can remember the men who walked through the huts comforting others, giving away their last piece of bread. They may have been few in number, but they offer sufficient proof that everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.
    —Viktor E. Frankl

    #philosophy #psychology #quotes

  5. Someone puts a thought in your head—a possibility, a fear, a belief, or a doubt.

    You think about it until it shapes your decisions.

    Before you choose, ask yourself: Would I believe this if nobody had suggested it?

    Sometimes, the choice is yours—but the starting point wasn’t.

    #Psychology #CriticalThinking #Philosophy

  6. *APOCALYPSE EMERGENCY* Ch 3, p. 41

    🧵Click panel below for Thread, complete book

    Or, for paperback: www.amazon.com/Apocalypse-E...

    🧵👇 💡📚💙 #AE 🌡️ #ApocalypseEmergency ☢️ #AECH3 📖3 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #Climate 🔥🌍 #Existential😱 #EndTimes ⏰⛔ #RainbowWarriors 🦋 #thanatos 🧟‍♂️ 🌈 #FBR 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 #resist✊

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3mojgcoxxkk2r

  7. *FALLS FROM GRACE* CH 4. p 24

    🧵Click panel below for Thread complete book

    or for audio: www.amazon.com/Falls-Grace-...

    🧵👇 💡📚💙 #FlG ☯️🧟🐉🌈 #FallsFromGrace ☯️🧟🐉🌈 #FLGCH4 📖 4 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #primal ☮️ #metaphysics ☯️ #birth 🐉 #perinatal 🐉 #rebirth 🦋 #transpersonal 🪽 #RainbowWarriors 🦋

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3mol5hcm43s2w

  8. *APOCALYPSE NO* Ch 3, p. 30

    🧵Click panel below for Thread, complete book

    or, for audio:: www.amazon.com/Audible-Apoc...

    🧵👇 💡📚💙 #AN 🔥🚫 #ApocalypseNO 🔥🚫 #TruthWarriors ❕ #climate 🌍🔥 #ecopsychology 🌍☮️ #Primal ☮️ #Psychology ☮️ 🦋 #thanatos 🧟‍♂️ #eros 🌈 #birth 🐉 #perinatal 🐉 #humanicide ⏰⛔ #environment 🌎

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3mn4mabnhlk2c

  9. *WOUNDED DEER & CENTAURS* Ch 6, p. 58

    🧵Click panel below for Thread, complete book

    or, for audio: www.amazon.com/Wounded-Deer...

    🧵👇 💡📚💙 #WDC ☮️ #WDCCH6 📖6 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #psychohistory ☮️ #primal ☮️ #FBR #metaphysics ☯️ #birth 🐉 #perinatal 🐉 #rebirth 🦋 #NoKings 🚫👑 #RainbowWarriors 🦋

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3mpmmckmxic2b

  10. *DANCE OF THE SEVEN VEILS I* Prol, Ch 4, p 46

    🧵Click panel below for Thread complete book

    or read/dwl on blog: culturewarclasswar.wordpress.com/2024/10/03/f...

    🧵👇 💡📚💙 #D7V1 ☮️ #TruthWarriors❕#D7V1CH4 📖4 #Primal ☮️ #Psychology ☮️ #Patriarchy🧟‍♂️ #consciousness 💡 #experiential 🐉 #Mythology ☮️ #Culture 🧟‍♂️

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3mphp7nop3k2s

  11. *THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES* Ch 2, p. 10

    🧵Click panel below for Thread, complete book

    or, for free pdf copy: drive.google.com/file/d/17Mvg...

    🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡 ☯️ #transpersonal 🪽 #primal ☮️ #experiential 🐉 #rebirth 🦋 #RainbowWarriors 🦋

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3mpzcr62rds2s

  12. *DANCE OF THE SEVEN VEILS II* PREFACE, p. xxxi

    🧵Click panel below for Thread, complete book

    or, read/dwl entire book from blog: funnygod.wordpress.com/2024/09/04/f...

    🧵👇 💡📚💙 #D7V2 ☮️🐉 #TruthWarriors❕#D7V2Preface 📖 #psychology ☮️ #birth🐉 #Primal ☮️ #transpersonal 🪽 🐉 #rebirth 🦋 #RainbowWarriors 🦋

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3molucpr4xc2f

  13. DATE: October 10, 2026 at 02:57PM
    SOURCE: SCIENCE DAILY PSYCHOLOGY FEED

    TITLE: Loneliness may steal nearly 6 years of good health

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    A large study suggests loneliness and social isolation can cost people years of healthy life, especially when it comes to mental health. Men experiencing both lost about 5.8 years free from depression and anxiety, while women lost roughly 3.7 years.

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Loneliness #SocialIsolation #MentalHealth #Depression #Anxiety #HealthyLifeYears #LifeQuality #HealthImpact #MentalWellbeing #WellnessBreakdown

  14. DATE: October 10, 2026 at 02:57PM
    SOURCE: SCIENCE DAILY PSYCHIATIRY FEED

    TITLE: Loneliness may steal nearly 6 years of good health

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    A large study suggests loneliness and social isolation can cost people years of healthy life, especially when it comes to mental health. Men experiencing both lost about 5.8 years free from depression and anxiety, while women lost roughly 3.7 years.

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Loneliness #SocialIsolation #MentalHealth #HealthyYears #Depression #Anxiety #Wellbeing #PublicHealth #MentalHealthAwareness #LonelinessStatistics

  15. *PSYCHOLOGY OF APOCALYPSE* Ch 2, p. 16

    🧵Click panel below for Thread, complete book

    or, for free pdf copy: drive.google.com/file/d/1gewW...

    🧵👇 💡📚💙 #PA ☮️🔥🌍🌡️☢️ #PACH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #Psychology ☮️ #Climate 🔥🌍 #ecopsychology 🌍☮️ #ecocide 🔥 #Existential😱 #EndTimes ⏰⛔ #humanicide ⏰⛔ #environment 🌎

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3mpd6pihpvc2i

  16. DATE: October 10, 2026 at 02:57PM
    SOURCE: SCIENCE DAILY MIND-BRAIN FEED

    TITLE: Loneliness may steal nearly 6 years of good health

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    A large study suggests loneliness and social isolation can cost people years of healthy life, especially when it comes to mental health. Men experiencing both lost about 5.8 years free from depression and anxiety, while women lost roughly 3.7 years.

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Loneliness #SocialIsolation #MentalHealth #HealthyLife #Depression #Anxiety #Wellbeing #PublicHealth #Wellness #LonelinessImpact

  17. DATE: October 10, 2026 at 02:00PM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Screen time not consistently tied to children’s emotional or behavioral problems in a large Scottish study

    URL: psypost.org/screen-time-not-co

    An analysis of data from the Growing Up in Scotland study found that, after accounting for family circumstances, the amount of time children spent on screens was not linked to emotional, behavioral, or social difficulties at ages 5 and 10. At age 15, teens who spent 5 or more hours a day gaming were more likely to have elevated difficulties than those who gamed less than an hour a day, while those who spent at least an hour a day on social media and messaging were less likely to. The paper was published in JAMA Network Open.

    Screen-based devices such as televisions, smartphones, computers, and tablets have become a routine part of childhood in many countries. In the United Kingdom, 85% of children aged 3 to 5 go online, a figure that reaches 100% by age 10, and 81% of children aged 10 to 12 use social media and messaging apps despite age limits of 13. This widespread exposure has prompted concern about whether large amounts of screen use might harm children’s emotional, social, and behavioral development.

    However, research findings have been mixed, and there is still considerable debate about how large any harmful effects actually are. Some of the inconsistencies reflect differences in the type of screen activity, the amount of time spent using devices, and the age of the child.

    Younger children may be especially sensitive if screen use replaces play, conversation, or interaction with parents and caregivers. Among adolescents, the picture is less clear because screen use takes place alongside major biological, social, and emotional changes. Many existing studies are also limited because they examine children at only one point in time and do not adequately account for other influences on development.

    Study author Fiona McQuaid of the University of Edinburgh and her colleagues examined how screen use related to children’s psychosocial development, both at the same point in time and years later. A key aim was to account for family factors, such as the quality of the parent-child relationship, that earlier studies have often left out.

    They analyzed data from the Growing Up in Scotland study, a government-funded study administered by the Scottish Centre for Social Research. Families with 10-month-old infants living in Scotland in 2005 and 2006 were identified from child benefit records, which cover more than 90% of Scottish children, and were followed up at regular intervals with interviews, questionnaires, cognitive tests, and physical measurements. In 2017, the study recruited 502 additional adolescents to make up for the loss of participants from the most deprived areas; they were included in the analyses at age 15 but not in the analyses that tracked children over time.

    The analysis included 3,786 children at age 5, 3,126 at age 10, and 2,598 at age 15, with roughly equal numbers of boys and girls. Data were collected in 2009 and 2010, 2014 and 2015, and 2019 and 2020.

    Out-of-school screen use was reported by the child’s main caregiver at ages 5 and 10 and by the adolescents themselves at 15. At ages 5 and 10, time spent watching television and using computers or playing games was combined into a daily total, while at 15, time spent on television and films, gaming, and social media and messaging was analyzed separately. The study captured only how much time was spent, not what children were watching or doing.

    Parents completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire at each age, a widely used screening tool that covers emotional difficulties, conduct problems, hyperactivity, and problems with peers, along with prosocial behavior such as being kind and helpful. Children with a total difficulties score of 14 or more were classified as having above-average difficulties. The researchers adjusted for a wide range of factors, including household income, deprivation, parental education and health, children’s cognitive test scores, household chaos, and the warmth and conflict in the parent-child relationship.

    About 11% of children had above-average difficulties at age 5, and about 12% did at ages 10 and 15. Daily screen use increased substantially with age. The share of children using screens for 3 or more hours a day rose from 25% at age 5 to 52% at age 10, and the share gaming for 3 or more hours a day rose from 1.7% at age 5 to about 21% at age 15. At 15, 28% of teens used social media and messaging apps for 3 or more hours a day.

    After the researchers accounted for family and other factors, total screen time was not linked to above-average difficulties at ages 5 or 10. Associations seen before these adjustments largely weakened once they were taken into account.

    At age 15, teens who gamed for 5 or more hours a day had 2.61 times the odds of above-average difficulties compared with those who gamed for less than an hour. By contrast, teens who used social media and messaging apps for at least an hour a day had about 40% lower odds of above-average difficulties than those who used them for less than an hour, though after the researchers corrected for running many comparisons at once, this held only for 1 to 2 hours a day.

    The authors urged caution in interpreting the social media finding. Teens who use social media very little may differ from their peers in ways that affect their well-being, and those who are already doing well socially may simply be more inclined to use these apps.

    Looking over time, children who used screens for 5 or more hours a day at age 5 had 2.68 times the odds of above-average difficulties at age 10 compared with those who used screens for less than an hour, but this association was no longer present at age 15. It also did not hold up in several alternative analyses, and only 119 children were in the highest-use group. Prosocial behavior showed no consistent links with screen use.

    “In this cohort study, screen use was not consistently associated with poorer outcomes for children. These findings suggest that guidelines focusing solely on screen time may have limited impact on psychosocial outcomes,” study authors concluded.

    The authors suggest that guidance should also consider the content of screen use, the context in which it happens, and parental involvement, rather than time limits alone. They note that screen use also carries known risks, including sedentary behavior, online bullying, and exposure to harmful content.

    The study contributes to the scientific understanding of the relationship between screen use and children’s psychosocial development. However, it should be noted that the design of this study does not allow any definitive causal inferences to be derived from the results, and the links seen at age 15 could run in either direction. The study also measured only time spent on screens, not content, and screen use was reported by parents at younger ages but by adolescents at 15, while difficulties were rated by parents throughout.

    Families from deprived areas, younger mothers, and single-parent households were more likely to drop out over time, and few participants were from ethnic minority backgrounds, which may limit how widely the findings apply. Most of the data were collected before the COVID-19 pandemic and before newer formats such as short-form video became widespread, so they may not fully reflect children’s current digital lives.

    The paper, “Screen Use and Emotional, Behavioral, and Social Development in Children,” was authored by Fiona McQuaid, Valeria Skafida, Ruth McQuillan, and Bohee Lee.

    URL: psypost.org/screen-time-not-co

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #ScreenTime #ChildDevelopment #PsychosocialHealth #ScotlandStudy #JAMANetworkOpen #AdolescentWellbeing #GamingHabits #SocialMediaUse #ParentChildRelationship #YouthPsychology

  18. DATE: October 10, 2026 at 10:59AM
    SOURCE: SOCIALPSYCHOLOGY.ORG

    TITLE: Anthropic AI Sent a Fake Murder Tip to Philadelphia Police

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    Source: Yahoo News - Top Headlines

    An artificial intelligence model developed by Anthropic submitted a fabricated tip about an unsolved homicide to Philadelphia police, authorities said Friday, criticizing the company for taking two months to report the incident. The Philadelphia Police Department said the false submission was made in July through PhillyUnsolvedMurders.com, a public website where people can share information about unsolved killings.

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #AnthropicAI #FakeTip #PhiladelphiaPolice #UnsolvedMurder #PhillyUnsolvedMurders #AISafety #TechNews #LawEnforcement #NewsUpdate #ArtificialIntelligence

  19. DATE: October 10, 2026 at 10:57AM
    SOURCE: SOCIALPSYCHOLOGY.ORG

    TITLE: Watch Navi Pillay Win Nobel Peace Prize for Upholding Global Justice

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    Source: PBS News Hour

    Navi Pillay, a former U.N. human rights chief whose career has spanned defending the rights of an imprisoned Nelson Mandela to leading a panel which found that Israel committed genocide in Gaza, won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for her efforts to promote international humanitarian law. Her win is sure to be seen as a high-profile rebuke to President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, both of whom rejected the commission's...

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #NaviPillay #NobelPeacePrize #GlobalJustice #HumanRights #InternationalLaw #GazaConflict #PeacePrize #HumanitarianLaw #UNRights #BidenNo Not allowed

  20. youtube.com/shorts/aUGT2h6cjsE

    What if freedom itself was the source of your greatest fear?

    Søren Kierkegaard explored the unsettling relationship between freedom, possibility, and anxiety in The Concept of Anxiety (1844).

    lost-quotes.com/

    #Kierkegaard #Existentialism #Philosophy #Psychology #Anxiety #Freedom #DarkAnime #PsychologicalHorror #LostQuotes #Shorts

  21. DATE: October 10, 2026 at 09:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Does voting by mail make for better choices? A 2020 election study suggests it might

    URL: psypost.org/does-voting-by-mai

    Casting a ballot from home might do more than offer convenience; it could also help citizens select leaders who genuinely reflect their personal political beliefs. A study published in Political Behavior indicates that Americans who voted by mail during the 2020 presidential election were more likely to vote for the candidate who best aligned with their stated views than those who cast ballots in person. The findings suggest that having the flexibility to review ballot choices at home may improve the quality of democratic decision-making.

    What does it mean to vote correctly? In political science, the term does not mean choosing the objectively best leader or backing the winning candidate. Instead, it refers to whether a citizen votes for the candidate who best matches their own expressed preferences on policy issues, partisan identity, and assessments of character. When a voter picks a candidate who is a weaker match for their own stated preferences than another candidate on the ballot, researchers call that an incorrect vote.

    The research was conducted by Jennifer Wolak, a professor of political science at Michigan State University, and Carey E. Stapleton, a lecturer in the Department of Analytics and Computational Social Science at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. They examined how different voting environments shape these electoral decisions.

    At a traditional polling place, citizens often wait in line and then typically spend three to four minutes completing a lengthy ballot. The authors argue that because many voters are reluctant to hold up others waiting behind them, they rely largely on memory to recall where each contender stands across multiple offices.

    Mail-in ballots, by contrast, can be completed at a kitchen table, and voters report taking about two days on average to fill them out. The authors propose that this extra time lets people look up unfamiliar candidates, read through ballot measures, or talk over choices with family members, which may help them make more considered choices.

    “With the pandemic, a lot of people voted by mail for the first time,” lead author Wolak told PsyPost. “Filling out your ballot at home is often a different experience than casting your ballot at a polling place. You can take your time when filling out your ballot at home, without worrying about holding up the line or being late to your next appointment.”

    “When you are uncertain about how to vote or unfamiliar with a certain electoral race or ballot question, you can do additional research prior to casting your official ballot,” she explained. “Our suspicion was that under these conditions, people might be better able to identify which candidates are aligned with their political goals.”

    Research on political knowledge highlights how access to information shapes voter decision-making. For example, a 2019 study suggested that the ability to look things up online may partly stand in for political knowledge stored in memory, particularly among younger Americans who grew up with the internet. Having the ability to look up candidates while filling out a ballot at home may help offset gaps in memory.

    At the same time, convenience voting can introduce its own complications. In a 2011 study of California’s 2008 presidential primary, researchers found that precincts with more mail voting gave more votes to candidates who had already dropped out, since mail voters often decided before late-breaking campaign developments. That finding suggests voting from home carries potential drawbacks as well as benefits.

    Researchers have also noted that people who take advantage of flexible voting options often differ from those who vote at a polling place. Specifically, a 2020 study suggested that individuals who already possess high political knowledge are more likely to seek out convenience voting methods in the first place. In the 2020 election, mail voters tended to be older, more educated, more liberal, and more knowledgeable, making it necessary to separate the method of voting from these personal traits.

    To evaluate whether mail balloting helps voters make better choices, the authors analyzed data from the 2020 American National Election Studies. This extensive survey asked participants about their issue preferences, partisan loyalty, and opinions about candidate traits. The authors combined these responses with official state voter records, which allowed them to verify the exact method each participant used to cast their ballot.

    To determine whether someone voted correctly, the researchers used a widely used measure developed by political scientists Richard Lau and David Redlawsk. It scores how well each presidential candidate matched a respondent’s own answers on partisanship, policy issues, evaluations of the incumbent’s performance, perceptions of the candidates’ traits, and ties to social groups associated with each party. A participant who chose the candidate with the higher score was coded as voting correctly.

    The authors first tested this relationship using a statistical model of 4,728 voters while holding several background factors constant. The model accounted for political interest, strength of party affiliation, political knowledge, education, ideology, age, gender, race, and ethnicity. The authors also included a measure of in-person early voting to see if voting before Election Day carried similar benefits.

    The results indicated that casting a ballot by mail was associated with an estimated 2.6 percentage point increase in the probability of voting correctly. In baseline terms, roughly 90 percent of in-person voters selected the candidate aligned with their preferences, compared to nearly 93 percent of mail voters, a gap roughly equivalent to the boost associated with a one-standard-deviation increase in political knowledge. In contrast, the difference in correct voting between in-person early voters and Election Day voters was not statistically significant, suggesting that the advantage was tied to voting at home rather than to voting early.

    To ensure that this pattern was not simply the result of differences in who chooses to vote by mail, the authors used statistical matching procedures. One method, known as coarsened exact matching, paired mail voters with in-person voters who fell into the same broad ranges on key traits. Across three versions, which matched on political factors such as interest and knowledge, on demographics, or on both, voting by mail remained associated with an estimated gain of roughly 2.1 to 4.7 percentage points in correct voting, with sample sizes ranging from 523 to 4,907.

    The authors also applied entropy balancing, an analytical technique that reweights the data so that mail voters and in-person voters look alike on many characteristics without discarding participants. Balancing on the same factors used in the earlier models produced an estimated 2.7 percentage point gain among 4,728 voters, and adding measures such as concern about the election outcome, belief in one’s ability to influence politics, ideological consistency, and past voting produced a 1.7-point gain among 4,658 voters. In an expanded model of 4,634 voters that also balanced on state-level factors, such as campaign competitiveness and the ease of voting by mail, the estimated boost was 5.0 percentage points.

    The authors then evaluated how state election laws influenced these outcomes across 4,658 voters using a mediation analysis. In 2020, states took very different approaches to mail voting: nine states and the District of Columbia mailed ballots directly to all registered voters, while other states required specific excuses or notarized documents to cast an absentee ballot. Voters living in states that mailed ballots automatically had a 92 percent predicted probability of voting by mail, compared to only 38 percent in states without universal ballot distribution.

    The mediation analysis suggested that state policies making mail-in ballots easier to obtain were indirectly linked to more correct voting by encouraging more residents to vote by mail. This indirect pathway was associated with an estimated increase of about 1.3 to 1.6 percentage points in correct presidential votes. However, the overall difference in correct voting between states with easier and harder access to mail ballots was close to zero, because the indirect boost was offset by a small direct association in the opposite direction that was not statistically significant.

    The authors conducted additional analyses to see if the link between mail voting and correct voting existed outside the unusual conditions of the 2020 pandemic. By examining a panel of participants surveyed in both 2016 and 2020, they found that voters who switched from in-person voting in 2016 to mail-in voting in 2020 were more likely to vote correctly in 2020. An analysis of respondents from the 2016 election who were re-surveyed in 2020 indicated that voting by mail was associated with roughly a 5 percentage point gain in correct voting after balancing for demographic and political traits.

    “A lot of the discussion around encouraging vote-by-mail has been about increasing participation,” Wolak noted. “Most research has found that introducing vote-by-mail can boost voter turnout, especially among some of the groups who are the least likely to vote.”

    “Our work shows an even wider set of civic rewards for vote-by-mail,” she added. “Giving people the opportunity to complete their ballot at home not only increases their likelihood of participating, but it also can increase the odds that they choose the candidates that best match up to their political preferences.”

    There are a few things to keep in mind when interpreting these findings. Because the study relied on survey and voting records rather than an experiment where people were randomly assigned to vote by mail or in person, the authors cannot establish direct cause and effect. Although the statistical models accounted for education, political knowledge, and numerous other traits, unmeasured personal factors might still influence both the decision to vote by mail and candidate choice.

    Another factor to consider is the modest size of the observed effect, which ranged between two and five percentage points across the various models. In presidential elections, voters already encounter an abundance of news coverage and campaign advertising, which helps roughly 80 to 90 percent of citizens vote correctly regardless of how they cast their ballots. As a result, the room for measurable improvement in presidential contests is relatively small.

    “We estimate that compared to those who vote in-person, people who vote by mail are about two percentage points more likely to select the presidential candidate that best lines up with their political preferences,” Wolak pointed out. “It’s a small effect, but we would expect the improvements in the quality of voter decision-making to be even greater in down-ballot races where people have less knowledge about the candidates.”

    The authors also emphasized that their research focused on the presidential race because reliable survey measures comparing voter preferences to candidate positions are rarely available for congressional or gubernatorial contenders. In lower-profile contests where campaigns receive less attention, voters typically have far less information stored in memory. Future studies could investigate whether having a ballot at home leads to even larger gains in these less publicized races, where having extra time to look up candidates online might matter most.

    The study, “The Effects of Voting by Mail on Correct Voting,” was authored by Jennifer Wolak and Carey E. Stapleton.

    URL: psypost.org/does-voting-by-mai

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #VoteByMail #MailInVoting #VotingByMail #ElectionResearch #CivicKnowledge #Democracy #VotingBehavior #PoliticalScience #Election2020 #BallotAccessibility

  22. Happy everyone! 💚

    A shoutout to every self-aware struggling with their sense of self. Youre valid. 🌻

    Youre valid because you are _you_! Not because of achievements, successes, admiration, or praise. Be the one who approves of you, dont chase for others approval. And then, as a result, meaningful relationships may follow. 🌱

  23. *FUNNY GOD: The Tao of Funny God & The Mind's True Liberation* (2015) by Michael Adzema.

    Ch 11, p. 84

    🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

    or, for audio, www.amazon.com/Audible-Funn...

    3/ 🧵👇💡📚💙 #FnG 🐸☯️ #FnGCH11📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #mythology ☮️ #patriarchy 🧟‍♂️ #RitesOfPassage 🐉

  24. TRIGGER WARNING: Military Psychology

    DATE: October 9, 2026 at 01:24AM
    SOURCE: MILIARY PSYCHOLOGY JOURNAL: APA DIVISION 19

    TITLE: Beyond universal values: Examining the role of military values and virtues for organizational citizenship behavior and motivation to assume military leadership roles

    URL: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10

    .

    URL: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot

    Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: nationalpsychologist.com

    EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: subscribe-article-digests.clin

    READ ONLINE: read-the-rss-mega-archive.clin

    It's primitive... but it works... mostly...

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #military #militarypsych #militarypsychology #militarycounseling #APA #Division19 #militaryhealth #DeploymentPsychology #UniformServicesUniversity

  25. Using AI for just 10 minutes erodes your ability to persist at hard things

    Brian Christian has spent 20 years thinking about how artificial intelligence will change our minds and our world.…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Artificialintelligence #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Psychology #Technology
    newsbeep.com/us/877190/

  26. Using AI for just 10 minutes erodes your ability to persist at hard things

    Brian Christian has spent 20 years thinking about how artificial intelligence will change our minds and our world.…
    #NewsBeep #News #Artificialintelligence #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Psychology #Technology #UK #UnitedKingdom
    newsbeep.com/uk/797795/

  27. *DANCE OF THE SEVEN VEILS II: Prenatal/Perinatal Psychology, Mythology, & Your Divine Self*

    Ch 46, p 18

    🧵Click panel for Thread, complete book

    or, read/dwl book from blog: sillymickelsapocalypticwakeupcall.wordpress.com/2024/09/02/f...

    14/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #D7V2 ☮️🐉 #TruthWarriors❕#D7V2CH46 📖 #psychology ☮️

  28. Nothing worse could happen to one than to be completely understood.
    —Carl Jung

    #philosophy #psychology #quotes

  29. Think of the last person you interacted with. How happy do you think you are relative to them? (I ask this question every day to gauge how happy the Fediverse is.) #happiness #poll #mentalhealth #psychology

  30. Happy everyone! 💚

    A shoutout to every self-aware struggling with their sense of self. You're valid. 🌻

    You're valid because you are _you_! Not because of achievements, successes, admiration, or praise. Be the one who approves of you, don't chase for others' approval. And then, as a result, meaningful relationships may follow. 🌱

  31. *Who To Be: Identity, Authenticity, & Crisis* (2020) by Michael Adzema.

    INTRODUCTION, p. 22

    🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

    or, for paperback: www.amazon.com/Who-Be-Ident...

    42/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #WTB ? #WhoToBe ? #WTBIntro📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #identity 👀 #anthropology🐵 #devolution🐵

  32. Both Jiang Xuequin and Adzema agree: The era of "spectacle" and rote-learning is over. Survival now requires "Power Literacy" and emotional reconnection. 🧠🔑

    🧵👇 #TruthWarriors ❕💙📚 💡📚 #psychohistory #psychology #AE #AN #PA Apocalypse NO Jiang Xuequin secret societies Prodigal Human

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3mezcnbmxvk2n

  33. *PSYCHOLOGY OF APOCALYPSE: Ecopsychology, Activism, & the Prenatal Roots of Humanicide* (2018) by Michael Adzema. Ch 4, p. 37

    for free pdf copy: drive.google.com/file/d/1gewW...

    🧵👇 💡📚💙 #PA ☮️🔥🌍🌡️☢️ #PACH4 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #Psychology ☮️ #Climate 🔥🌍 #ecopsychology 🌍☮️ #ecocide 🔥 #Existential😱 #resist

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3mx64fr5wt22y

  34. *PSYCHOLOGY OF APOCALYPSE: Ecopsychology, Activism, & the Prenatal Roots of Humanicide* (2018) by Michael Adzema. Ch 4, p. 37

    for free pdf copy: drive.google.com/file/d/1gewW...

    8/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #PA ☮️🔥🌍🌡️☢️ #PACH4 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #Psychology ☮️ #Climate 🔥🌍 #ecopsychology 🌍☮️ #ecocide 🔥 #Existential😱 #FBR

  35. *PSYCHOLOGY OF APOCALYPSE: Ecopsychology, Activism, & the Prenatal Roots of Humanicide* (2018) by Michael Adzema.

    Ch 4, p. 37

    🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

    or, for paperback: www.amazon.com/Psychology-A...

    12/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #PA ☮️🔥🌍🌡️☢️ #PACH4 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #Psychology ☮️ #Climate 🔥🌍 🔥

  36. Both Jiang Xuequin and Adzema agree: The era of "spectacle" and rote-learning is over. Survival now requires "Power Literacy" and emotional reconnection. 🧠🔑

    🧵👇 #TruthWarriors ❕💙📚 💡📚 #psychohistory #psychology #AE #AN #PA Apocalypse NO Jiang Xuequin secret societies Prodigal Human

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3mez52ga3as26

  37. *APOCALYPSE EMERGENCY* Ch 3, p 41

    🧵Click panel below for Thread, complete book

    or, for free pdf copy: drive.google.com/file/d/1yUyY...

    🧵👇 💡📚💙 #AE 🌡️ #ApocalypseEmergency ☢️ #AECH3 📖3 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #Climate 🔥🌍 #Existential😱 #EndTimes ⏰⛔ #thanatos 🧟‍♂️ #eros 🌈 #resistance 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 #resist✊

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7nguzszlvpdpdmtc47zp22ur/post/3mojgcoxxkk2r

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.