#simulations — Public Fediverse posts

A sneak peek inside the glorious life of a high-tech Data Center Engineer - HINT - it ain't that glorious!

Decommissioning Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Sierra Supercomputer. https://www.wired.com/story/why-sierra-the-supercomputer-had-to-die/ #Computing #SuperComputer #Sierra #CPU #GPU #Dehydration #LawrenceLivermore #USGov #Simulations #Recycling #Linux #ClassifiedData #Data #OS #HardDrives

The #COLIBRE project - calibrating subgrid feedback in cosmological simulations that include a cold gas phase / Cosmological hydrodynamical #simulations of #GalaxyFormation and evolution: https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/548/1/stag300/8650960 / https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/548/1/stag375/8650959 -> New simulations reveal the cold, dusty reality of galaxy formation: https://www.astronomie.nl/nieuws/en/new-simulations-reveal-the-cold-dusty-reality-of-galaxy-formation-4807

✨🔭 Interesting news from outer space: #Cassini data plus global #MHD #simulations show that #Saturn’s cusp is not noon-centered like #Earth’s, but shifted toward the post-noon and even post-dusk sector. Xu, Yao, & Arridge et al. identify 67 cusp events and argue that rapid rotation plus internal #plasma sources fundamentally reshape Saturn’s global magnetic topology:

📝 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69666-9

#SpacePhysics #PlanetaryScience #Magnetosphere

Excited to share that I’ll be speaking about how the game mechanics of Oceania 2084 reinforce the political themes of the game at Serious Play Europe 2026 in Mainz, Germany, June 18 to 19 at KUZ Kulturzentrum. The program features a packed lineup of talks, workshops, panels, and walk-and-talk sessions, plus an expo and arcade zone, bringing together an international community working at the intersection of games, learning, health, and social impact. If you’ll be in Mainz, I’d love to connect, and I hope to see you there. Registration details are at https://eu.seriousplayconf.com/registration/

#seriousplay26 #seriousgames #gamebasedlearning #gbl #gamification #training #simulations #games #play #educationalgames #innovation #gamesforrevolution

3-Apr-2026
Engineering the bite of ancient marine predators
A new study compares the bite efficiency of #fossil #reptiles using advanced #engineering #simulations.

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1122694

#science #ecology #paleontology #biomechanics

Excellent article from Saudi-Arabia, asking the question whether the USA entered the war because they trusted silly little text extrusion machines over human expertise?

#Palantir's "Ender's Foundry" used to develop #simulations for #war outcomes was developed only SIXTY F****NG DAYS before planning commenced!!

So, basically an off-the-shelf #chatbot, with sycophancy still full on, gave these clowns the confidence to go into a full-scale disaster in #iran 🤦‍♂️

https://houseofsaud.com/iran-war-ai-psychosis-sycophancy-rlhf/

#ai

This mind-numbing 54-minute #thesis proposes that #AI is pulling away the #wealth ladder, but fails spectacularly by drowning it in #probability #theory and #interactive #simulations 🤯. Meanwhile, the author seems to think that a wall of text will magically make readers reach for their checkbooks 💸. As if anyone has the time to read this novel before AI takes over! 😂
https://danielhomola.com/m%20&%20e/ai/your-bridge-to-wealth-is-being-pulled-up/ #Gap #HackerNews #ngated

Ah, yes, nothing screams "wealth-building advice" quite like a 54-minute slog through probability theory and #interactive #simulations. 🤖🔧 Because when AI isn't busy taking over the world, it's apparently stealing our wealth-building credentials too! 🏰💸
https://danielhomola.com/m%20&%20e/ai/your-bridge-to-wealth-is-being-pulled-up/ #wealthbuilding #AIprobability #techhumor #financialliteracy #HackerNews #ngated

PsyPost: Therapists test an AI dating simulator to help chronically single men practice romantic skills. “Over a three-month period, participants who completed a guided dating simulation reported notable drops in feelings of loneliness, as well as decreases in general mental and sexual distress. These results, published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, suggest that digital companions could […]

"We used complex computer programs – the same ones used to forecast Earth’s future warming scenarios – to simulate the climates of famous fantasy settings such as Tolkien’s Middle-earth, the continents of Westeros in the Game of Thrones, and the far-future Earth in The Wheel of Time series. We also built a model for a fictional world developed by one of us."

https://theconversation.com/do-middle-earth-and-westeros-make-sense-climate-scientists-modelled-them-to-find-out-277232

#Research #Climate #SFF #WorldBuilding #Simulations

Is anyone else sick of living in a reality which is nothing but all the #dystopian #fiction from 50 years ago?

We have #JamesBond villains ( #Musk)

We have #InvasionoftheBodySnatchers zombification ( #MAGA)

Etc, etc.

And now we have #Wargames:

" #AI s can’t stop recommending #nuclear strikes in #war game #simulations

Leading AIs from #OpenAI, #Anthropic and #Google opted to use #nuclearWeapons in simulated war games in 95 per cent of cases"

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2516885-ais-cant-stop-recommending-nuclear-strikes-in-war-game-simulations/

#Wargame #simulations can’t predict the future, but they can explore outcomes. These findings aren’t encouraging. Putting complex, nuanced political/military decisions in the hands of AI is just asking for annihilation. I thought there was a sci-fi film series based on this premise.... 1/2

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2516885-ais-cant-stop-recommending-nuclear-strikes-in-war-game-simulations/

AIs can't stop recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulations

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2516885-ais-cant-stop-recommending-nuclear-strikes-in-war-game-simulations/

#HackerNews #AIs #nuclear #strikes #war #games #simulations #technology

Fabric simulation in Blender is Very Normal™ #blender #simulations

I'm still fairly #newhere, but getting closer. 🙂

As you can see from my previous posts, my focus is mainly on visual content - I'm fascinated by our beautiful world and #simulations of it (AI-generated stuff excluded).

I'm always happy to connect and curious to follow what you have to share!

#neuhier #photography #zoo #greyheron #graureiher #penguin #pinguin #bird #vogel

BlueSky’s Solution To Moderating Is Moderating Without Moderating via Social Proximity

I have noticed a lot of people are confused about why some posts don’t show up on threads, though they are not labeled by the moderation layer. Bluesky has begun using what it calls social neighborhoods (or network proximity) as a ranking signal for replies in threads. Replies from people who are closer to you in the social graph, accounts you follow, interact with, or share mutual connections with, are prioritized and shown more prominently. Replies from accounts that are farther away in that network are down-ranked. They are pushed far down the thread or placed behind “hidden replies.”

Each person gets their own unique view of a thread based on their social graph. It creates the impression that replies from distant users simply don’t exist. This is true even though they’re still technically public and viewable if you expand the thread or adjust filters. Bluesky is explicitly using features of subgraphs to moderate without moderating. Their reasoning is that if you can’t see each other, you can’t harass each other. Ergo, there is nothing to moderate.

Bluesky mentions that here:

https://bsky.social/about/blog/10-31-2025-building-healthier-social-media-update

As a digression, I’m not going to lie: I really enjoyed working on software built on the AT protocol, but their fucking users are so goddamn weird. It’s sort of like enjoying building houses, but hating every single person who moves into them. But, you don’t have to deal with them because you’re just the contractor. That is how I feel about Bluesky. I hate the people. I really like the protocol and infrastructure.

I sort of am a sadist who does enjoy drama, so I do get schadenfreude from people with social media addictions and parasocial fixations who reply to random people on Bluesky, because they don’t realize their replies are disconnected from the author’s thread unless that person is within their network. They aren’t part of the conversation they think they are. They’re algorithmically isolated from everyone else. Their replies aren’t viewable from the author’s thread because of how Bluesky handles social neighborhoods.

Bluesky’s idea of social neighborhoods is about grouping users into overlapping clusters based on real interaction patterns rather than just the follow graph. Unlike Twitter, it does not treat the network as one big public square. Instead, it models networks of “social neighborhoods” made up of people you follow, people who follow you, people you frequently interact with, and people who are closely connected to those groups. They’re soft, probabilistic groupings rather than strict labels.

Everyone does not see the same replies. Bluesky is being a bit vague with “hidden.” Hidden means your reply is still anchored to the thread and can be expanded. There is another way Bluesky can handle this. Bluesky uses social neighborhoods to judge contextual relevance. Replies from people inside or near your social neighborhood are more likely to be shown inline with a thread, expanded by default, or served in feeds. Replies from outside your neighborhood are still public and still indexed, but they’re treated as lower-context contributions.

Basically, if you reply to a thread, you will see it anchored to the conversation, and everyone will see it in search results, as a hashtag, or from your profile, but it will not be accessible via the thread of the person you were replying to. It is like shadow-banning people from threads unless they are strongly networked.

Because people have not been working with the AT Protocol like I have, they assume they are shadow-banned across the entire Bluesky app view. No—everyone is automatically shadow-banned from everyone else unless they are within the same social neighborhood. In other words, you are not part of the conversation you think you are joining because you are not part of their social group.

Your replies will appear in profiles, hashtag feeds, or search results without being visually anchored to the full thread. Discovery impressions are neighborhood-agnostic: they serve content because it matches a query, tag, or activity stream. Once the reply is shown, the app then decides whether it’s worth pulling in the rest of the conversation for you. If the original author and most participants fall outside your neighborhood, Bluesky often chooses not to expand that context automatically.

Bluesky really is trying to avoid having to moderate, so this is their solution. Instead of banning or issuing takedown labels to DIDs, the system lets replies exist everywhere, but not in that particular instance of the thread.

I find this ironic because a large reason why many people are staying on Bluesky and not moving to the fediverse—thank God, because I do not want them there—is discoverability, virality, and engagement.

In case anyone is asking how I know so much about how these algorithms work: I was a consultant on a lot of these types of algorithms, so I certainly hope I’d know how they work, lol. No, you get no more details about the work I’ve done. I have no hand in the algorithm Bluesky is using, but I have proposed and implemented that type of algorithm before.

I have an interest in noetics and the noosphere. A large amount of my ontological work is an extension of my attempts to model domains that have no spatial or temporal coordinates. The question is how do you generalize a metric space that has no physically, spatial properties. I went to school to try to formalize those ideas. Turns out they’re rather useful for digital social networks, too. The ontological analog to spatial distance, when you have no space, is a graph of similarities.

This can be modeled by representing each item as a node in a weighted graph, where edges are weighted by dissimilarity rather than similarity. Highly similar items are connected by low-weight edges, while less similar items are connected by higher-weight edges. Distances in the graph, computed using standard shortest-path algorithms, then correspond to degrees of similarity. Closely related items are separated by short path lengths, while increasingly dissimilar items require longer paths through the graph. It turns out that attempts to generalize metric spaces for noetic domains—to model noetic/psychic spaces—are actually pretty useful for social media algorithms, lol.

BlueSky’s Solution To Moderating Is Moderating Without Moderating via Social Proximity

I have noticed a lot of people are confused about why some posts don’t show up on threads, though they are not labeled by the moderation layer. Bluesky has begun using what it calls social neighborhoods (or network proximity) as a ranking signal for replies in threads. Replies from people who are closer to you in the social graph, accounts you follow, interact with, or share mutual connections with, are prioritized and shown more prominently. Replies from accounts that are farther away in that network are down-ranked. They are pushed far down the thread or placed behind “hidden replies.”

Each person gets their own unique view of a thread based on their social graph. It creates the impression that replies from distant users simply don’t exist. This is true even though they’re still technically public and viewable if you expand the thread or adjust filters. Bluesky is explicitly using features of subgraphs to moderate without moderating. Their reasoning is that if you can’t see each other, you can’t harass each other. Ergo, there is nothing to moderate.

Bluesky mentions that here:

https://bsky.social/about/blog/10-31-2025-building-healthier-social-media-update

As a digression, I’m not going to lie: I really enjoyed working on software built on the AT protocol, but their fucking users are so goddamn weird. It’s sort of like enjoying building houses, but hating every single person who moves into them. But, you don’t have to deal with them because you’re just the contractor. That is how I feel about Bluesky. I hate the people. I really like the protocol and infrastructure.

I sort of am a sadist who does enjoy drama, so I do get schadenfreude from people with social media addictions and parasocial fixations who reply to random people on Bluesky, because they don’t realize their replies are disconnected from the author’s thread unless that person is within their network. They aren’t part of the conversation they think they are. They’re algorithmically isolated from everyone else. Their replies aren’t viewable from the author’s thread because of how Bluesky handles social neighborhoods.

Bluesky’s idea of social neighborhoods is about grouping users into overlapping clusters based on real interaction patterns rather than just the follow graph. Unlike Twitter, it does not treat the network as one big public square. Instead, it models networks of “social neighborhoods” made up of people you follow, people who follow you, people you frequently interact with, and people who are closely connected to those groups. They’re soft, probabilistic groupings rather than strict labels.

Everyone does not see the same replies. Bluesky is being a bit vague with “hidden.” Hidden means your reply is still anchored to the thread and can be expanded. There is another way Bluesky can handle this. Bluesky uses social neighborhoods to judge contextual relevance. Replies from people inside or near your social neighborhood are more likely to be shown inline with a thread, expanded by default, or served in feeds. Replies from outside your neighborhood are still public and still indexed, but they’re treated as lower-context contributions.

Basically, if you reply to a thread, you will see it anchored to the conversation, and everyone will see it in search results, as a hashtag, or from your profile, but it will not be accessible via the thread of the person you were replying to. It is like shadow-banning people from threads unless they are strongly networked.

Because people have not been working with the AT Protocol like I have, they assume they are shadow-banned across the entire Bluesky app view. No—everyone is automatically shadow-banned from everyone else unless they are within the same social neighborhood. In other words, you are not part of the conversation you think you are joining because you are not part of their social group.

Your replies will appear in profiles, hashtag feeds, or search results without being visually anchored to the full thread. Discovery impressions are neighborhood-agnostic: they serve content because it matches a query, tag, or activity stream. Once the reply is shown, the app then decides whether it’s worth pulling in the rest of the conversation for you. If the original author and most participants fall outside your neighborhood, Bluesky often chooses not to expand that context automatically.

Bluesky really is trying to avoid having to moderate, so this is their solution. Instead of banning or issuing takedown labels to DIDs, the system lets replies exist everywhere, but not in that particular instance of the thread.

I find this ironic because a large reason why many people are staying on Bluesky and not moving to the fediverse—thank God, because I do not want them there—is discoverability, virality, and engagement.

In case anyone is asking how I know so much about how these algorithms work: I was a consultant on a lot of these types of algorithms, so I certainly hope I’d know how they work, lol. No, you get no more details about the work I’ve done. I have no hand in the algorithm Bluesky is using, but I have proposed and implemented that type of algorithm before.

I have an interest in noetics and the noosphere. A large amount of my ontological work is an extension of my attempts to model domains that have no spatial or temporal coordinates. The question is how do you generalize a metric space that has no physically, spatial properties. I went to school to try to formalize those ideas. Turns out they’re rather useful for digital social networks, too. The ontological analog to spatial distance, when you have no space, is a graph of similarities.

BlueSky’s Solution To Moderating Is Moderating Without Moderating via Social Proximity

I have noticed a lot of people are confused about why some posts don’t show up on threads, though they are not labeled by the moderation layer. Bluesky has begun using what it calls social neighborhoods (or network proximity) as a ranking signal for replies in threads. Replies from people who are closer to you in the social graph, accounts you follow, interact with, or share mutual connections with, are prioritized and shown more prominently. Replies from accounts that are farther away in that network are down-ranked. They are pushed far down the thread or placed behind “hidden replies.”

Each person gets their own unique view of a thread based on their social graph. It creates the impression that replies from distant users simply don’t exist. This is true even though they’re still technically public and viewable if you expand the thread or adjust filters. Bluesky is explicitly using features of subgraphs to moderate without moderating. Their reasoning is that if you can’t see each other, you can’t harass each other. Ergo, there is nothing to moderate.

Bluesky mentions that here:

https://bsky.social/about/blog/10-31-2025-building-healthier-social-media-update

As a digression, I’m not going to lie: I really enjoyed working on software built on the AT protocol, but their fucking users are so goddamn weird. It’s sort of like enjoying building houses, but hating every single person who moves into them. But, you don’t have to deal with them because you’re just the contractor. That is how I feel about Bluesky. I hate the people. I really like the protocol and infrastructure.

I sort of am a sadist who does enjoy drama, so I do get schadenfreude from people with social media addictions and parasocial fixations who reply to random people on Bluesky, because they don’t realize their replies are disconnected from the author’s thread unless that person is within their network. They aren’t part of the conversation they think they are. They’re algorithmically isolated from everyone else. Their replies aren’t viewable from the author’s thread because of how Bluesky handles social neighborhoods.

Bluesky’s idea of social neighborhoods is about grouping users into overlapping clusters based on real interaction patterns rather than just the follow graph. Unlike Twitter, it does not treat the network as one big public square. Instead, it models networks of “social neighborhoods” made up of people you follow, people who follow you, people you frequently interact with, and people who are closely connected to those groups. They’re soft, probabilistic groupings rather than strict labels.

Everyone does not see the same replies. Bluesky is being a bit vague with “hidden.” Hidden means your reply is still anchored to the thread and can be expanded. There is another way Bluesky can handle this. Bluesky uses social neighborhoods to judge contextual relevance. Replies from people inside or near your social neighborhood are more likely to be shown inline with a thread, expanded by default, or served in feeds. Replies from outside your neighborhood are still public and still indexed, but they’re treated as lower-context contributions.

Basically, if you reply to a thread, you will see it anchored to the conversation, and everyone will see it in search results, as a hashtag, or from your profile, but it will not be accessible via the thread of the person you were replying to. It is like shadow-banning people from threads unless they are strongly networked.

Because people have not been working with the AT Protocol like I have, they assume they are shadow-banned across the entire Bluesky app view. No—everyone is automatically shadow-banned from everyone else unless they are within the same social neighborhood. In other words, you are not part of the conversation you think you are joining because you are not part of their social group.

Your replies will appear in profiles, hashtag feeds, or search results without being visually anchored to the full thread. Discovery impressions are neighborhood-agnostic: they serve content because it matches a query, tag, or activity stream. Once the reply is shown, the app then decides whether it’s worth pulling in the rest of the conversation for you. If the original author and most participants fall outside your neighborhood, Bluesky often chooses not to expand that context automatically.

Bluesky really is trying to avoid having to moderate, so this is their solution. Instead of banning or issuing takedown labels to DIDs, the system lets replies exist everywhere, but not in that particular instance of the thread.

I find this ironic because a large reason why many people are staying on Bluesky and not moving to the fediverse—thank God, because I do not want them there—is discoverability, virality, and engagement.

In case anyone is asking how I know so much about how these algorithms work: I was a consultant on a lot of these types of algorithms, so I certainly hope I’d know how they work, lol. No, you get no more details about the work I’ve done. I have no hand in the algorithm Bluesky is using, but I have proposed and implemented that type of algorithm before.

I have an interest in noetics and the noosphere. A large amount of my ontological work is an extension of my attempts to model domains that have no spatial or temporal coordinates. The question is how do you generalize a metric space that has no physically, spatial properties. I went to school to try to formalize those ideas. Turns out they’re rather useful for digital social networks, too. The ontological analog to spatial distance, when you have no space, is a graph of similarities.

This can be modeled by representing each item as a node in a weighted graph, where edges are weighted by dissimilarity rather than similarity. Highly similar items are connected by low-weight edges, while less similar items are connected by higher-weight edges. Distances in the graph, computed using standard shortest-path algorithms, then correspond to degrees of similarity. Closely related items are separated by short path lengths, while increasingly dissimilar items require longer paths through the graph. It turns out that attempts to generalize metric spaces for noetic domains—to model noetic/psychic spaces—are actually pretty useful for social media algorithms, lol.

BlueSky’s Solution To Moderating Is Moderating Without Moderating via Social Proximity

I have noticed a lot of people are confused about why some posts don’t show up on threads, though they are not labeled by the moderation layer. Bluesky has begun using what it calls social neighborhoods (or network proximity) as a ranking signal for replies in threads. Replies from people who are closer to you in the social graph, accounts you follow, interact with, or share mutual connections with, are prioritized and shown more prominently. Replies from accounts that are farther away in that network are down-ranked. They are pushed far down the thread or placed behind “hidden replies.”

Each person gets their own unique view of a thread based on their social graph. It creates the impression that replies from distant users simply don’t exist. This is true even though they’re still technically public and viewable if you expand the thread or adjust filters. Bluesky is explicitly using features of subgraphs to moderate without moderating. Their reasoning is that if you can’t see each other, you can’t harass each other. Ergo, there is nothing to moderate.

Bluesky mentions that here:

https://bsky.social/about/blog/10-31-2025-building-healthier-social-media-update

As a digression, I’m not going to lie: I really enjoyed working on software built on the AT protocol, but their fucking users are so goddamn weird. It’s sort of like enjoying building houses, but hating every single person who moves into them. But, you don’t have to deal with them because you’re just the contractor. That is how I feel about Bluesky. I hate the people. I really like the protocol and infrastructure.

I sort of am a sadist who does enjoy drama, so I do get schadenfreude from people with social media addictions and parasocial fixations who reply to random people on Bluesky, because they don’t realize their replies are disconnected from the author’s thread unless that person is within their network. They aren’t part of the conversation they think they are. They’re algorithmically isolated from everyone else. Their replies aren’t viewable from the author’s thread because of how Bluesky handles social neighborhoods.

Bluesky’s idea of social neighborhoods is about grouping users into overlapping clusters based on real interaction patterns rather than just the follow graph. Unlike Twitter, it does not treat the network as one big public square. Instead, it models networks of “social neighborhoods” made up of people you follow, people who follow you, people you frequently interact with, and people who are closely connected to those groups. They’re soft, probabilistic groupings rather than strict labels.

Everyone does not see the same replies. Bluesky is being a bit vague with “hidden.” Hidden means your reply is still anchored to the thread and can be expanded. There is another way Bluesky can handle this. Bluesky uses social neighborhoods to judge contextual relevance. Replies from people inside or near your social neighborhood are more likely to be shown inline with a thread, expanded by default, or served in feeds. Replies from outside your neighborhood are still public and still indexed, but they’re treated as lower-context contributions.

Basically, if you reply to a thread, you will see it anchored to the conversation, and everyone will see it in search results, as a hashtag, or from your profile, but it will not be accessible via the thread of the person you were replying to. It is like shadow-banning people from threads unless they are strongly networked.

Because people have not been working with the AT Protocol like I have, they assume they are shadow-banned across the entire Bluesky app view. No—everyone is automatically shadow-banned from everyone else unless they are within the same social neighborhood. In other words, you are not part of the conversation you think you are joining because you are not part of their social group.

Your replies will appear in profiles, hashtag feeds, or search results without being visually anchored to the full thread. Discovery impressions are neighborhood-agnostic: they serve content because it matches a query, tag, or activity stream. Once the reply is shown, the app then decides whether it’s worth pulling in the rest of the conversation for you. If the original author and most participants fall outside your neighborhood, Bluesky often chooses not to expand that context automatically.

Bluesky really is trying to avoid having to moderate, so this is their solution. Instead of banning or issuing takedown labels to DIDs, the system lets replies exist everywhere, but not in that particular instance of the thread.

I find this ironic because a large reason why many people are staying on Bluesky and not moving to the fediverse—thank God, because I do not want them there—is discoverability, virality, and engagement.

In case anyone is asking how I know so much about how these algorithms work: I was a consultant on a lot of these types of algorithms, so I certainly hope I’d know how they work, lol. No, you get no more details about the work I’ve done. I have no hand in the algorithm Bluesky is using, but I have proposed and implemented that type of algorithm before.

I have an interest in noetics and the noosphere. A large amount of my ontological work is an extension of my attempts to model domains that have no spatial or temporal coordinates. The question is how do you generalize a metric space that has no physically, spatial properties. I went to school to try to formalize those ideas. Turns out they’re rather useful for digital social networks, too. The ontological analog to spatial distance, when you have no space, is a graph of similarities.

This can be modeled by representing each item as a node in a weighted graph, where edges are weighted by dissimilarity rather than similarity. Highly similar items are connected by low-weight edges, while less similar items are connected by higher-weight edges. Distances in the graph, computed using standard shortest-path algorithms, then correspond to degrees of similarity. Closely related items are separated by short path lengths, while increasingly dissimilar items require longer paths through the graph. It turns out that attempts to generalize metric spaces for noetic domains—to model noetic/psychic spaces—are actually pretty useful for social media algorithms, lol.

Astroturfing Is Pretty Pointless When Social Subgraphs Are Fragmented (e.g., the Fediverse)

I am seeing astroturfing in the fediverse again, by AT Protocol developers implicitly trying to shill their products. I think it is stochastic behavior by developers with too much time on their hands. Honestly, I do not care. I like the people on ActivityPub more, but I like the AT Protocol better, and I have developed for both. Astroturfing on ActivityPub networks is fascinating to me because it is so pointless.

I am actually a Computational Biologist and Computer Scientist whose specialty is combinatorics, social graphs, graph theory, etc. Specifically, I use this to create epidemiological models for the memetic layer of human behaviors that act as vectors for diseases, using the SIRS model. I do not just study germs; I study human behaviors.

The models I construct extend into a “memetic layer,” in which beliefs, norms, and behaviors (such as risk-taking, compliance with public health measures, or susceptibility to misinformation) spread contagiously through social networks. These behaviors function as vectors that modulate biological transmission rates. As a result, the spread of ideas can accelerate, dampen, or reshape the spread of disease. By running computational simulations and agent-based models on these graphs, I study how network structure, influential nodes, clustering, and platform-specific dynamics affect behavioral contagion. I also examine how these factors influence epidemiological outcomes.

To say it very concisely, I study how the spread of bat-shit insane beliefs, shit posts, and memes influences whether or not there is a measles outbreak in Texas. Ironically, this is an evolution of my studying semiotics, memetics, and chaos magick in high school. I got a job where I can use occult, anarchist techniques professionally.

I think a large reason why I do not care about astroturfing in the fediverse is that it’s so pointless, lol. Astroturfing to manipulate the narrative would actually work better on Bluesky to keep people there than trying to recruit from the fediverse. Furthermore, big instances are relatively small. Some people on Bluesky have follower lists larger than an entire large instance in the fediverse.

Within ActivityPub networks, astroturfing rarely propagates far, because whether information spreads depends on properties of the social graph itself. Dense connectivity, short paths between communities, and a sufficient number of cross-cutting ties support diffusion. ActivityPub’s architecture tends to produce graphs that are fragmented and highly modular. This limits the reach of coordinated activity.

ActivityPub is a system where each instance maintains its own local user graph and exchanges activities through inboxes and outboxes. This makes it autonomous and decentralized. The network consists of loosely connected subgraphs. Cross-instance edges appear only through explicit follow relationships. The ActivityPub protocol does not provide a shared or complete view of the network. Measurements of the fediverse consistently show uneven connectivity between instances, clustering at the instance level, and relatively long effective path lengths across the network. Under these conditions, large cascades are uncommon.

Instance-level clustering means that in ActivityPub networks, users interact much more with others on the same server than with users on different servers. Because each instance has its own local timeline, culture, and moderation, connections form densely within instances and only sparsely across them through explicit follow relationships. This creates a network made up of tightly connected local communities linked by relatively few cross-instance ties, which slows the spread of information beyond its point of origin.

However, with the AT Protocol, global indexing and aggregation are explicitly supported. Relays and indexers can assemble near-complete views of the social graph. Applications built on top of this infrastructure operate over a graph that is denser and easier to traverse. There are fewer structural barriers between communities. The diffusion dynamics change substantially when content can move across the graph without relying on narrow federated paths.

Astroturfing depends on coordinated amplification, typically through tightly synchronized clusters of accounts intended to manufacture visibility. Work on coordinated inauthentic behavior shows that these tactics gain traction when they intersect highly connected regions of the graph or bridge otherwise separate communities. In networks with strong modularity, coordination remains local. ActivityPub’s federation model produces this kind of modularity by default. Coordinated clusters stand out clearly within instances. Their effects remain confined to those local neighborhoods.

Astroturfing on ActivityPub therefore tends to stall on its own because of the underlying graph topology. Without dense inter-instance connectivity or any form of global indexing, coordinated campaigns have a hard time moving beyond the immediate regions where they originate. Systems built on globally indexable social graphs, including those enabled by the AT Protocol, expose a much larger surface for viral spread. Network structure and connectivity account for the divergence where that is independent of moderation, cultural norms, ideology, or intent.

It’s just really funny to me how these stochastic techbro groups waste so many resources. I personally don’t want to go viral, which is why I avoid platforms where I can. The fact that it’s harder to achieve high virality on ActivityPub is exactly why I prefer the fediverse over the Atmosphere. One way to think about it is that you can change the ‘genetics’ of a system with a retrovirus, where memetic entities act as cultural retroviruses to reprogram the cultural loci of a space. That is their end goal. They are trying to hijack cultures memetically. You see this a lot with culture jamming.

Basically, the astroturfing on ActivityPub networks is designed to jam and subvert the culture. But, as I have already said, the topological structure makes memetic virality stall. They cannot achieve that kind of viral spread in the fediverse, which is why I cannot understand why they do this every year.

Do you like #economics, #simulations and indie #webgames?

Try Miniconomy, the longest-running online economy simulation game.

Go to https://www.miniconomy.com/campaign/mastodon-0226 and get 7 Premium Member days for free!

(only for new players)

So at this point in #Blender, #physics #simulations are basically done only with geometry nodes. Engines like #Mantaflow and #Bullet, or any other external engine, are pretty much a thing of the past now. #b3d #Blender3d

Ah, another brave soul attempting to document the earth-shattering epiphanies gleaned from their #mundane #AI encounter. 🤖🎉 Just what the world needed: another thrilling tale of #deterministic #simulations and performance numbers, because clearly, there's a drought of mind-numbingly #boring AI #posts. 🙄📈
https://matklad.github.io/2026/01/20/vibecoding-2.html #Epiphany #Encounters #HackerNews #ngated

Addicted with TheoTown 🏙️

#sofiaflorina #ソフィアフロリナ #theotown #game #games #videogame #videogames #simulation #simulations #mobilegame #mobilegames #citybuilding #citybuildinggame #citybuildinggames #simulationgame #simulationgames #addicted #imaddicted #iamaddicted #gaming #gamingaddiction

I just had the problem that the seed generator would put out the same seed if the simulations I run take shorter than a second. The best solution I came up with was to wait until there is at least one second between start of the runs😅

#seed #random #python #simulations

Cập nhật mô phỏng đối lưu tự nhiên và bức xạ tích hợp cho đèn LED COB 200W dùng OpenFOAM. Kết quả: nhiệt độ tản nhiệt cao nhất ~78°C, gặp khó khăn trong tính toán viewFactor (chậm), mô hình P1 chênh lệch ~6-8°C. Tìm lời khuyên về tiếp cận TIM chính xác và điều kiện biên ổn định hơn. Dùng #OpenFOAM #ThermalDesign #LED #MôPhỏngThermal #Engineering #Science #Technology #Simulations #TảnNhiệt #KỹThuật

https://dev.to/emma-suntech/simulation-of-natural-convection-radiative-coupling-heat-dissipation-f

Ravens’ Playoff Chances: An NFL Simulation Deep Dive with The Athletic

NFL seasons are a marathon and not a sprint. John Harbaugh’s team has battled injuries and inconsistency through…
#nflL #nflplayoffs #NFLPlayoffs #baltimore #BaltimoreRavens #Bengals #Bills #Chiefs #Cincinnati #Football #Jets #JoeBurrow #JohnHarbaugh #LamarJackson #NFL #Patriots #Pittsburgh #simulations #Steelers #Thanksgivingnight #TheRavens
https://www.rawchili.com/nfl/556141/

Ravens’ Playoff Chances: An NFL Simulation Deep Dive with The Athletic

NFL seasons are a marathon and not a sprint. John Harbaugh’s team has battled injuries and inconsistency through…
#nflL #nflplayoffs #NFLPlayoffs #baltimore #BaltimoreRavens #Bengals #Bills #Chiefs #Cincinnati #Football #Jets #JoeBurrow #JohnHarbaugh #LamarJackson #NFL #Patriots #Pittsburgh #simulations #Steelers #Thanksgivingnight #TheRavens
https://www.rawchili.com/nfl/556141/

Ravens’ Playoff Chances: An NFL Simulation Deep Dive with The Athletic https://www.rawchili.com/nfl/556141/ #baltimore #BaltimoreRavens #Bengals #Bills #Chiefs #Cincinnati #Football #Jets #JoeBurrow #JohnHarbaugh #LamarJackson #NFL #NFLPlayoffs #Patriots #Pittsburgh #simulations #Steelers #ThanksgivingNight #TheRavens

Ravens’ Playoff Chances: An NFL Simulation Deep Dive with The Athletic https://www.rawchili.com/nfl/556141/ #baltimore #BaltimoreRavens #Bengals #Bills #Chiefs #Cincinnati #Football #Jets #JoeBurrow #JohnHarbaugh #LamarJackson #NFL #NFLPlayoffs #Patriots #Pittsburgh #simulations #Steelers #ThanksgivingNight #TheRavens

@grobi

I spent a long while wondering if it rained more or less during a full moon….

There is so much information with modern science, the human brain isn’t big enough. If, very if, we could put verified scientific knowledge into a suitable bigger brain, then we might figure it all out.

Can I just add that predictive #simulations scare me as much as untamed ai. Math(s) isn’t real, it is our best guess at what we think is real using methods we made up.

Scientists simulate the brain on a supercomputer
Creating a virtual brain may sound like a science-fiction nightmare, but for neuroscientists in Japan and at Seattle’s Allen Institute, it’s a big step toward a long-held dream.

They say their mouse-cortex simulation, run on one of the world’s fastest supercompute
https://cosmiclog.com/2025/11/17/scientists-simulate-the-brain-on-a-supercomputer/
#GeekWire #AllenInstitute #Brain #Health #Neuroscience #Science #Simulations #Supercomputers

The heat shield 🔥🛡️ was not permeable enough during #Artemis I. This led to gas buildup, higher pressures, and the observed cracking. The heat shield for Artemis II is actually more impermeable than the Artemis I vehicle.

#NASA’s data 💽 convinced the IRT that modifying the entry profile for Artemis II would offset the impermeability of the heat shield.

"#NASA is relying on #risk assessments and #simulations to determine the safety of #Orion’s existing heat shield." https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/12/former-flight-director-who-reviewed-orion-heat-shield-data-says-there-was-no-dissent/

👨‍💻 Oh joy, another #GitHub repository promising to revolutionize the world of physics-based #simulations with the excitement of... *contact solving*. 🚀 The average coder will dive right into "sttechppfcontactsolver" with the same enthusiasm they have for reading stereo instructions. But hey, at least GitHub wants you to believe #AI will write better code for you. 🤖
https://github.com/st-tech/ppf-contact-solver #Physics #Contact #Solving #Coding #HackerNews #ngated

ZOZO's Contact Solver (for physics-based simulations)

https://github.com/st-tech/ppf-contact-solver

#HackerNews #ZOZO #Contact #Solver #physics #simulations #simulation #technology #GitHub

No - I promise that I am “not high” - but the following occurred to me when I woke up…

So, currently many people say “this is the worst timeline” - and that could still be true.

However, I think that the way things are going this “timeline” is either a simulation - or someone’s work of “speculative fiction”…

This is the pivotal crux point where “it all goes off the rails”.

Nazi fascists are back in power, the climate is going to collapse, the billionaires are running amok, there are just so many things that seem like “plot points” or “what if” events (if a simulation).

Not that it matters to us who are in it - we are bound by the overall rules/narrative and consequences will occur.

What is also interesting to think about is… Who are the “main characters”?

#simulationtheory #worsttimeline #fiction #philosophy #simulation #simulations #ai

Something else on déjà vu I remembered, what PKD theorized about it:

“..we are living in a computer-programmed reality, and the only clue we have to it is when some variable is changed, and some alteration in our reality occurs.” -Philip K Dick

Dick thought that the alterations in our reality feel like déjà vu, a sensation that proves that “a variable has been changed”, and those are the times when “an alternative world branched off.”

https://www.openculture.com/2024/05/philip-k-dick-theorizes-the-matrix.html

And this great (wild) interview with Rizwan Virk made me remember it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rG8l4GvjiLs

#DejaVu #SimulationTheory #simulation #simulations #FreeWill #multiverse #science #PKD #PhilipKDick #RizwanVirk #physics #QuantumComputing

🔥 Dive into the riveting world of statistical physics with #R, where you'll realize that writing endless lines of code for Monte Carlo #simulations is SO much more fun than watching paint dry! 🎨✨ But wait, there's more: GitHub's #AI is here to save the day by doing absolutely nothing to alleviate the tedium! 🤖💤
https://github.com/msuzen/isingLenzMC #statisticalphysics #MonteCarlo #GitHub #codingfun #HackerNews #ngated

On episode 508: Descartes’ Demon — William Griffin sits down with Chris & Elecia to unpack hardware-in-the-loop testing, simulation, and how we actually learn complex technical topics.

Here’s a tip William thinks everyone should know:

🎧 Listen now in your favorite podcast app: https://embedded.fm/episodes/508

Thanks to Mouser Electronics for sponsoring the show!

#EmbeddedSystems #HardwareInTheLoop #EngineeringEducation #simulations
#embedded #engineering #testing #hardware-in-loop #books

🌍 Pushing #ClimateModeling to the Next Level

What happens when you run global climate #simulations at the kilometre scale for multiple years

In our latest blog post, we share insights from a landmark #nextGEMS study using ECMWF’s Integrated Forecasting System coupled to high-resolution ocean–sea ice models.

These simulations capture fine-scale processes—from mesoscale #OceanEddies to #UrbanHeat patterns—that coarser models can’t resolve, offering a more realistic picture of our climate system. Along the way, the team tackled key challenges, from water and #EnergyConservation to improving the simulation of #ExtremePrecipitation and polar sea ice leads.

💡 The results point towards more accurate, actionable climate information—but also highlight the huge computational demands of this frontier.

📖 Read the blog post on our website and comment below to get the link to the original publication by Thomas Rackow et al., 2025.

#H2020 #HighResolutionModels #EarthSystemScience #StormResolvingModels

@ECMWF
@cinea_EU

Simulations reveal the secret to strengthening carbon fiber

https://www.ornl.gov/news/simulations-reveal-secret-strengthening-carbon-fiber

#HackerNews #Simulations #CarbonFiber #Strengthening #Research #Innovation #MaterialScience

Easy Ghost Imaging Simulations (and some codes to do it at home)

https://fsolt.es/2025/04/easy-ghost-imaging-simulations-and-some-codes-to-do-it-at-home/

Many mysteries surround the origin of the universe. 🎆 One of these concerns the ‘false vacuum decay’, exploring the dynamics of the ‘Big Bang’.💫 🌍 A team of scientists from JSC, the University of Leeds & the Institute of Science and Technology Austria used #quantum #simulations to examine it more closely. The results were published in Nature Physics. 👏 Dr Jaka Vodeb (JSC) explains these findings in an interview:
https://www.fz-juelich.de/en/ias/jsc/news/news-items/jsc-interview-false-vacuum-decay

#quantumcomputing #supercomputing #science #FZJ

'Last Ice Area' In The Arctic Could Disappear Much Sooner Than Previously Thought
--
https://phys.org/news/2025-01-ice-area-arctic-sooner-previously.html <-- shared technical article
--
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02034-5 <-- shared paper
--
#GIS #spatial #mapping #Arctic #Canada #LastIceArea #LIA #icedependent #species #ArcticOcean #icefree #climatechange #ecology #polarbears #belugas #bowheadwhales #walruses #ringedseals #beardedseals #ivorygulls #spatialanalysis #model #modeling #spatiotemporal #Tuvaijuittuq #FirstNation #inuit #indigenous #seaice #simulations #archipelago

'Last Ice Area' In The Arctic Could Disappear Much Sooner Than Previously Thought
--
https://phys.org/news/2025-01-ice-area-arctic-sooner-previously.html <-- shared technical article
--
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02034-5 <-- shared paper
--
#GIS #spatial #mapping #Arctic #Canada #LastIceArea #LIA #icedependent #species #ArcticOcean #icefree #climatechange #ecology #polarbears #belugas #bowheadwhales #walruses #ringedseals #beardedseals #ivorygulls #spatialanalysis #model #modeling #spatiotemporal #Tuvaijuittuq #FirstNation #inuit #indigenous #seaice #simulations #archipelago

'Last Ice Area' In The Arctic Could Disappear Much Sooner Than Previously Thought
--
https://phys.org/news/2025-01-ice-area-arctic-sooner-previously.html <-- shared technical article
--
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02034-5 <-- shared paper
--
#GIS #spatial #mapping #Arctic #Canada #LastIceArea #LIA #icedependent #species #ArcticOcean #icefree #climatechange #ecology #polarbears #belugas #bowheadwhales #walruses #ringedseals #beardedseals #ivorygulls #spatialanalysis #model #modeling #spatiotemporal #Tuvaijuittuq #FirstNation #inuit #indigenous #seaice #simulations #archipelago

'Last Ice Area' In The Arctic Could Disappear Much Sooner Than Previously Thought
--
https://phys.org/news/2025-01-ice-area-arctic-sooner-previously.html <-- shared technical article
--
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02034-5 <-- shared paper
--
#GIS #spatial #mapping #Arctic #Canada #LastIceArea #LIA #icedependent #species #ArcticOcean #icefree #climatechange #ecology #polarbears #belugas #bowheadwhales #walruses #ringedseals #beardedseals #ivorygulls #spatialanalysis #model #modeling #spatiotemporal #Tuvaijuittuq #FirstNation #inuit #indigenous #seaice #simulations #archipelago

'Last Ice Area' In The Arctic Could Disappear Much Sooner Than Previously Thought
--
https://phys.org/news/2025-01-ice-area-arctic-sooner-previously.html <-- shared technical article
--
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02034-5 <-- shared paper
--
#GIS #spatial #mapping #Arctic #Canada #LastIceArea #LIA #icedependent #species #ArcticOcean #icefree #climatechange #ecology #polarbears #belugas #bowheadwhales #walruses #ringedseals #beardedseals #ivorygulls #spatialanalysis #model #modeling #spatiotemporal #Tuvaijuittuq #FirstNation #inuit #indigenous #seaice #simulations #archipelago

[Observations and #simulations] In addition to #observations of protostars using #interferometers with ever-higher resolution, researchers are developing multidimensional numerical simulations.

The aim is to better understand the formation and evolution of the #protostellar disk and the #protostar through the different phases and scales of the collapse of a dense low- and high-mass core.

This Thursday, Benoît Commerçon, researcher @cnrs at the Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon (CRAL), will present to IRAPians the results obtained using “his” numerical experiments, as well as future developments ... https://www.irap.omp.eu/event/disk-and-protostar-formation-new-insights-from-3d-numerical-simulations/

On this note: are you interested in #tech, #selfHosting, #science, #computationalScience, #HPC, #liberatoryTech, or just #POSIX in general but otherwise lack the resources, financial or otherwise? Get in touch with me and we can have a chat about maybe getting you some time. I can't promise when things will be ready or how much I can offer, but.

No generative AI training, please. 'Classic' ML that doesn't generate trash, contribute to surveillance, or rely on stolen data is fine though.

EDIT: please feel free to boost! DMs for initial contact are fine; while I run my server, I do not run yours so just a hello and a general area of interest are all I ask that you put in there. If you feel a project or interest is sensitive we can arrange another chat medium from there. I just wanna get a sense of who you are since I'll be, you know, letting you access the computer sitting in my office lmao.

EDIT 2: I can also specifically help to some degree if you're interested in learning about #computationalChemistry, #proteinFolding, or running a few different types of #simulations.

EDIT 3: If you're interested in writing/deploying/understanding #webDesign, #webTech, etc, that's also possible. I'm not trying to limit anything here, mostly just tagging with what things I know.

EDIT 4: jesus christ Audrey. Anyway, "a sense of who you are" does NOT have to include personally identifying information. I mean much more informal and useful stuff than that, such as what you're interested in and wanna work on. I want you to get to know me a little bit, too, because we'll both need a degree of trust and if you feel you can't trust me then please don't force yourself to.

RE: https://fire.asta.lgbt/notes/a3911f2wi43200mf