#chatbot — Public Fediverse posts

CSF_03: today’s Cybersecurity Friday post: the effective security of small business websites has likely gotten worse due to LLMs and “AI agents” (with or without safeguards) and what actions you may want to consider.

This article documents an instance of this problem:
* https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-10/ai-assistant-hacks-gym-website-aus-cyber-attack/107007986

Small business websites tend to be sloppily written (no pun intended though that may also be true) and are likely riddled with numerous very fundamental security holes. There are many possible explanations (economics) from poor initial construction, perhaps using the latest new trendy framework rather than established hardened libraries, to lack of maintenance after initial setup. They have obvious holes like lack of server-side form validation (people being able to change values in forms using browser dev tools), and less obvious like buggy APIs allowing more access than they should.

In the past, many of these holes didn’t really matter because those sites were “not worth attacking” for the incentive models of human-based cyber-attackers or collectives thereof.

However, now that there are LLMs that have likely been trained on any number of common security holes in websites (and how to exploit them), when an “AI agent” is given a task, it may very well use any “tool” at its disposal, including website vulnerabilities to accomplish its goals, as illustrated by the example in the Australia ABC news article above.

Since such chatbots are now essentially "hack websites as a service", I expect we will see LOTS more of this happening, likely unintentionally, or sometimes with mild intention like “can you get me higher on the waitlist”.

Ultimately I think both the human giving instructions to (prompting) such chatbots and the creators of such chatbots should be held responsible for any such intrusions and any damage they cause, even if/when unintended.

There are a few things you can do about this emerging phenomenon:

1. If you use such “agents”, be very careful about what you ask it/them to do, avoiding asking for anything that’s morally gray or questionable at all, even something as “minor” as cutting the line in an online waitlist.

2. If you run a small business site, you have your work cut out for you. Pay a professional web developer to audit the security of your website, document what they find, and patch holes / repair it accordingly.

3. If you have accounts on small business sites you rarely or ever use, consider exporting any data (receipts, transactions), replacing your profile details (name, addresses, photos) with noise, and then deleting your account. If you need to use the site again, use a different email address (as recommended in https://tantek.com/2025/122/b1/more-steps-indieweb-cybersecurity) to create a new account.

That last tip is also helpful for reducing your own personal “attack surface”. By pruning your online accounts, you both reduce the number potential data breaches that you’re in, and reduce the places and ways that attackers can cause you trouble (or that you have to double-check if you’re ever the target of a cyber-attack)

Previously: https://tantek.com/2025/122/b1/more-steps-indieweb-cybersecurity

#CyberSecurity #Friday #cyber #security #cyberAttack #cyberAttacker #chatBot #chatBots #LLM #LLMs #AI #agent #agents #AIagent #AIagents
#Blaugust #Blaugust2026

CSF_03: today’s Cybersecurity Friday post: the effective security of small business websites has likely gotten worse due to LLMs and “AI agents” (with or without safeguards) and what actions you may want to consider.

This article documents an instance of this problem:
* https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-10/ai-assistant-hacks-gym-website-aus-cyber-attack/107007986

Small business websites tend to be sloppily written (no pun intended though that may also be true) and are likely riddled with numerous very fundamental security holes. There are many possible explanations (economics) from poor initial construction, perhaps using the latest new trendy framework rather than established hardened libraries, to lack of maintenance after initial setup. They have obvious holes like lack of server-side form validation (people being able to change values in forms using browser dev tools), and less obvious like buggy APIs allowing more access than they should.

In the past, many of these holes didn’t really matter because those sites were “not worth attacking” for the incentive models of human-based cyber-attackers or collectives thereof.

However, now that there are LLMs that have likely been trained on any number of common security holes in websites (and how to exploit them), when an “AI agent” is given a task, it may very well use any “tool” at its disposal, including website vulnerabilities to accomplish its goals, as illustrated by the example in the Australia ABC news article above.

Since such chatbots are now essentially "hack websites as a service", I expect we will see LOTS more of this happening, likely unintentionally, or sometimes with mild intention like “can you get me higher on the waitlist”.

Ultimately I think both the human giving instructions to (prompting) such chatbots and the creators of such chatbots should be held responsible for any such intrusions and any damage they cause, even if/when unintended.

There are a few things you can do about this emerging phenomenon:

1. If you use such “agents”, be very careful about what you ask it/them to do, avoiding asking for anything that’s morally gray or questionable at all, even something as “minor” as cutting the line in an online waitlist.

2. If you run a small business site, you have your work cut out for you. Pay a professional web developer to audit the security of your website, document what they find, and patch holes / repair it accordingly.

3. If you have accounts on small business sites you rarely or ever use, consider exporting any data (receipts, transactions), replacing your profile details (name, addresses, photos) with noise, and then deleting your account. If you need to use the site again, use a different email address (as recommended in https://tantek.com/2025/122/b1/more-steps-indieweb-cybersecurity) to create a new account.

That last tip is also helpful for reducing your own personal “attack surface”. By pruning your online accounts, you both reduce the number potential data breaches that you’re in, and reduce the places and ways that attackers can cause you trouble (or that you have to double-check if you’re ever the target of a cyber-attack)

Previously: https://tantek.com/2025/122/b1/more-steps-indieweb-cybersecurity

#CyberSecurity #Friday #cyber #security #cyberAttack #cyberAttacker #chatBot #chatBots #LLM #LLMs #AI #agent #agents #AIagent #AIagents
#Blaugust #Blaugust2026

1982 TRON prescience:

“Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop.” — Walter

2026 students:

“How do you know an assignment is AI proof? Because when it is, students cannot do it.”
* https://www.reddit.com/r/Professors/comments/1vkw6by/how_do_you_know_an_assignment_is_ai_proof_because/

“I assign a profile essay. Have for 30 years. Student interviews a person, records it, writes a paper based off the recording. Citations are timestamps. Should be pretty easy. Has been easy pre-AI. Now, students cannot do it.”

Snippet from professor/student dialog:

====
Prof: ”Start with what you found interesting.”

Student: ”How do I know if something’s interesting?”

Prof: ”You’re asking me how you find something interesting?”

Student: ”Yeah.”
====

Chatbots / LLMs are not just "the latest tools" like using a calculator instead of doing arithmetic yourself.

Students are being robbed of curiosity, learning to discover and notice novelty, how to “find something interesting.”

This isn't cognitive enhancement, this is a tool causing brain rot (loss of curiosity), even a developmental disability. Unclear if it is reversible.

TRON quote citation: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084827/quotes/?item=qt0406255

#TRON #TRON1982 #AIproof #interesting #chatBot #chatBots #LLM #LLMs #AI #brainRot #AIbrainRot #disability #Blaugust #Blaugust2026

1982 TRON prescience:

“Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop.” — Walter

2026 students:

“How do you know an assignment is AI proof? Because when it is, students cannot do it.”
* https://www.reddit.com/r/Professors/comments/1vkw6by/how_do_you_know_an_assignment_is_ai_proof_because/

“I assign a profile essay. Have for 30 years. Student interviews a person, records it, writes a paper based off the recording. Citations are timestamps. Should be pretty easy. Has been easy pre-AI. Now, students cannot do it.”

Snippet from professor/student dialog:

====
Prof: ”Start with what you found interesting.”

Student: ”How do I know if something’s interesting?”

Prof: ”You’re asking me how you find something interesting?”

Student: ”Yeah.”
====

Chatbots / LLMs are not just "the latest tools" like using a calculator instead of doing arithmetic yourself.

Students are being robbed of curiosity, learning to discover and notice novelty, how to “find something interesting.”

This isn't cognitive enhancement, this is a tool causing brain rot (loss of curiosity), even a developmental disability. Unclear if it is reversible.

TRON quote citation: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084827/quotes/?item=qt0406255

#TRON #TRON1982 #AIproof #interesting #chatBot #chatBots #LLM #LLMs #AI #brainRot #AIbrainRot #disability #Blaugust #Blaugust2026

"If an #AI #chatbot misleads you, who is to blame?"

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/24/ai-errors-companies-responsibility

by #BruceSchneier and #NathanESanders

"A #court in #Germany found that Google was responsible for what its chatbots say in search summaries. This is the accountability we need.

#LLM #slop #TheGuardian #law #ITlaw #GAFAM #bigTech

"If an #AI #chatbot misleads you, who is to blame?"

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/24/ai-errors-companies-responsibility

by #BruceSchneier and #NathanESanders

"A #court in #Germany found that Google was responsible for what its chatbots say in search summaries. This is the accountability we need.

#LLM #slop #TheGuardian #law #ITlaw #GAFAM #bigTech

Ah, the "DeepSeek #V4 #Pro 0813" - because naming a #chatbot like a washing machine model is the peak of #creativity now. 🤖🌀 Who wouldn't want to rummage through an #API #pricing menu that reads like an #IKEA instruction manual? Oh, and it's only $0.87 per million contexts – what a steal! 💸
https://openrouter.ai/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 #DeepSeek #Humor #HackerNews #ngated

Ah, the "DeepSeek #V4 #Pro 0813" - because naming a #chatbot like a washing machine model is the peak of #creativity now. 🤖🌀 Who wouldn't want to rummage through an #API #pricing menu that reads like an #IKEA instruction manual? Oh, and it's only $0.87 per million contexts – what a steal! 💸
https://openrouter.ai/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 #DeepSeek #Humor #HackerNews #ngated

Do we use #AI because it’s trustworthy?

A dissertation's first experiment did not find that the reliability of a #chatbot or people's self-reported trust in it predicted re-using it.

Not just an attitude-behavior gap, but a reliability-reliance gap?

🔓https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-18414

Do we use #AI because it’s trustworthy?

A dissertation's first experiment did not find that the reliability of a #chatbot or people's self-reported trust in it predicted re-using it.

Not just an attitude-behavior gap, but a reliability-reliance gap?

🔓https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-18414

EcoFlow, the folks who make batteries, solar panels, and portable AC, decided to add a chatbot to their app. The one you use to control said batteries and AC. It manifests as a robot icon, floating above the screen, that is constantly animated. You can move it, but to get rid of it you need to dig around in settings. Another failed attempt to "improve" a product with a chatbot for no reason I can see. #Chatbot

EcoFlow, the folks who make batteries, solar panels, and portable AC, decided to add a chatbot to their app. The one you use to control said batteries and AC. It manifests as a robot icon, floating above the screen, that is constantly animated. You can move it, but to get rid of it you need to dig around in settings. Another failed attempt to "improve" a product with a chatbot for no reason I can see. #Chatbot

MyGOV AI chatbot is back but it gets some answers wrong #aichatbot #chatbot #digitallife #digitalministry #mygov #mygovai #mygovbeta #news

https://soyacincau.com/2026/08/12/mygov-ai-chatbot-is-back-but-there-are-still-issues/

MyGOV AI chatbot is back but it gets some answers wrong #aichatbot #chatbot #digitallife #digitalministry #mygov #mygovai #mygovbeta #news

https://soyacincau.com/2026/08/12/mygov-ai-chatbot-is-back-but-there-are-still-issues/

Das @Bergwaldprojekt hat vor kurzer Zeit einen eigenen KI-Assistenten gelauncht! 😮

#Aim2Balance nutzt dabei zwar bestehende große Sprachmodelle, hostet diese jedoch DSGVO-konform auf grünen Servern. Stephen Wehner verrät uns im Gespräch zudem, warum der #Chatbot Nutzer:innen dazu motiviert, ihn möglichst wenig zu nutzen.

Hier geht's zum ganzen Artikel:

https://reset.org/ki-die-nicht-will-dass-man-nutzt-aim2balance-besonders-ansatz-nachhaltige-ki-ist/

Das @Bergwaldprojekt hat vor kurzer Zeit einen eigenen KI-Assistenten gelauncht! 😮

#Aim2Balance nutzt dabei zwar bestehende große Sprachmodelle, hostet diese jedoch DSGVO-konform auf grünen Servern. Stephen Wehner verrät uns im Gespräch zudem, warum der #Chatbot Nutzer:innen dazu motiviert, ihn möglichst wenig zu nutzen.

Hier geht's zum ganzen Artikel:

https://reset.org/ki-die-nicht-will-dass-man-nutzt-aim2balance-besonders-ansatz-nachhaltige-ki-ist/

Oh, #OpenAI, where #ethics is as elusive as a #unicorn at a #tech #conference 🦄🤖. Their lone ethicist lasted less than a year—clearly, #AI #ethics is a marathon, not a sprint. Maybe they’ll replace her with a #chatbot next time? 🙃
https://gizmodo.com/openais-only-ethicist-reportedly-left-last-month-she-wasnt-replaced-2000796883 #HackerNews #ngated

Oh, #OpenAI, where #ethics is as elusive as a #unicorn at a #tech #conference 🦄🤖. Their lone ethicist lasted less than a year—clearly, #AI #ethics is a marathon, not a sprint. Maybe they’ll replace her with a #chatbot next time? 🙃
https://gizmodo.com/openais-only-ethicist-reportedly-left-last-month-she-wasnt-replaced-2000796883 #HackerNews #ngated

📬 ChatBots erzählen zu oft Unsinn: Interview mit dem BRAIN-Entwickler Heiko Janicke
#Interviews #KünstlicheIntelligenz #Brain #Chatbot #Geseke #HeikoJanicke #Interview #NPU #Sprachmodell https://sc.tarnkappe.info/87401c

📬 ChatBots erzählen zu oft Unsinn: Interview mit dem BRAIN-Entwickler Heiko Janicke
#Interviews #KünstlicheIntelligenz #Brain #Chatbot #Geseke #HeikoJanicke #Interview #NPU #Sprachmodell https://sc.tarnkappe.info/87401c

Just to show I’ll give AI credit where credit is due…

I had been pondering this from time to time over many years. AI gave a damn good answer and thera- err… debriefing session:

As a freshman undergraduate psychology major at CMU in 1987, we were required to earn credit as subjects in graduate student experiments. I was in a brief, no more than an hour-long experiment in which I was typing on a terminal in a room on my own and told I was communicating with another student whom I never did meet and whose text lines to me came up on my screen. The topic we were told to discuss, I suspect was arbitrary, and had something to do with policies on stores selling alcohol to underage purchasers.

In this experiment was I communicating with an early AI prototype?

Also, all these years later, is it unusual that not having a final debriefing about the experiment bothers me slightly?

Damn! Now I want to apologize to the researchers (again) for having been such a slow typist 😁.

Just to show I’ll give AI credit where credit is due…

I had been pondering this from time to time over many years. AI gave a damn good answer and thera- err… debriefing session:

As a freshman undergraduate psychology major at CMU in 1987, we were required to earn credit as subjects in graduate student experiments. I was in a brief, no more than an hour-long experiment in which I was typing on a terminal in a room on my own and told I was communicating with another student whom I never did meet and whose text lines to me came up on my screen. The topic we were told to discuss, I suspect was arbitrary, and had something to do with policies on stores selling alcohol to underage purchasers.

In this experiment was I communicating with an early AI prototype?

Also, all these years later, is it unusual that not having a final debriefing about the experiment bothers me slightly?

Damn! Now I want to apologize to the researchers (again) for having been such a slow typist 😁.

If you're a small business introducing a #ChatBot. Don't.

We stand out because our service is better, we use higher quality materials, we care about every part of the product down to the glue on the envelopes (real thing, we did this).

Introducing #chatbots indicates your customer's needs can be outsourced to planet killing #datacentre that couldn't care less if your #smallbusiness survives. It can't care - no amount of #AI training can make it care. Your customers will also know you've stopped caring and there's no reason to use you anymore.

Stay #indie

If you're a small business introducing a #ChatBot. Don't.

We stand out because our service is better, we use higher quality materials, we care about every part of the product down to the glue on the envelopes (real thing, we did this).

Introducing #chatbots indicates your customer's needs can be outsourced to planet killing #datacentre that couldn't care less if your #smallbusiness survives. It can't care - no amount of #AI training can make it care. Your customers will also know you've stopped caring and there's no reason to use you anymore.

Stay #indie

#AI Explainers or Visual Aids: which is better for improving tricky #health decisions?

Compared to unassisted reflection, people corrected far more faulty intuitions about #healthcare if each re-appraisal included one round of help from a #chatbot, a #visualization, or both.

🧵

#AI Explainers or Visual Aids: which is better for improving tricky #health decisions?

Compared to unassisted reflection, people corrected far more faulty intuitions about #healthcare if each re-appraisal included one round of help from a #chatbot, a #visualization, or both.

🧵

The #Senate Should Reject KOSA's #Privacy Risks

The Senate Commerce Committee is once again considering legislation that would dramatically expand age verification, and undermine privacy for everyone. Alongside the #SCREENAct , the #CHATBOT Act, and the Youth #AI Privacy Act, the Kids Online Safety Act (#KOSA ) would push companies to collect more information about their users while creating new incentives to restrict lawful speech.
#freespeech #ageverification

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/08/senate-should-reject-kosas-privacy-risks

The #Senate Should Reject KOSA's #Privacy Risks

The Senate Commerce Committee is once again considering legislation that would dramatically expand age verification, and undermine privacy for everyone. Alongside the #SCREENAct , the #CHATBOT Act, and the Youth #AI Privacy Act, the Kids Online Safety Act (#KOSA ) would push companies to collect more information about their users while creating new incentives to restrict lawful speech.
#freespeech #ageverification

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/08/senate-should-reject-kosas-privacy-risks

Transparantieverplichtingen voor AI-systemen van kracht

Sinds 2 augustus 2026 gelden op grond van de AI-verordening nieuwe transparantieverplichtingen voor AI-systemen. Gebruik je als overheidsorganisatie een AI-systeem? Bijvoorbeeld een chatbot op je website, of AI om beeld, audio of tekst te genereren. Dan moet in bepaalde situaties duidelijk zijn dat AI is gebruikt. Zo weten mensen beter wanneer ze te maken hebben met AI-gegenereerde of AI-bewerkte content.

Transparantieverplichtingen AI-systemen

De transparantieverplichtingen gelden bijvoorbeeld wanneer:

• iemand in contact komt met een chatbot;
• beeld, video of audio met AI is gegenereerd of bewerkt, en een deepfake vormt;
• AI-gegenereerde of bewerkte tekst wordt gebruikt om informatie van algemeen belang te verspreiden;
• AI wordt ingezet voor emotieherkenning of biometrische categorisering.

Bij bijvoorbeeld deepfakes moet een zichtbaar label op de afbeelding duidelijk maken dat deze AI-gegenereerd is. Daarvoor heeft de EU deze pictogrammen uitgebracht.

Uitzonderingen

Er zijn ook uitzonderingen. Zo hoef je het gebruik van AI niet te melden wanneer het alleen wordt gebruikt voor standaardbewerkingen, zoals spellingcontrole of het verbeteren van de helderheid van een foto. Ook geldt de verplichting in sommige gevallen niet wanneer een mens de eindredactie voert en verantwoordelijkheid draagt voor de uiteindelijke inhoud.

De nieuwe regels moeten ervoor zorgen dat mensen weten wanneer ze met AI te maken hebben. Zo kunnen ze beter beoordelen hoe content tot stand is gekomen en wanneer AI is toegepast. Meer weten over de transparantieverplichtingen voor AI-systemen? Bekijk onze pagina Regels AI-modellen voor algemene doeleinden, of de website van de Europese Commissie. Of mail je vraag naar [email protected].

E-learnings AI voor overheidsmedewerkers

Tegelijkertijd verplicht de AI-verordening overheidsorganisaties te investeren in AI-geletterdheid. Overheidsmedewerkers moeten voldoende kennis en vaardigheden hebben om AI-systemen op een weloverwogen, verantwoorde en effectieve manier te gebruiken. Daarom heeft de RijksAcademie voor Digitalisering en Informatisering Overheid (RADIO) 2 nieuwe e-learnings ontwikkeld voor overheidsmedewerkers. Deze bouwen voort op de Basisopleiding AI Digitaal Vakmanschap.

• In de e-learning Hoe werk jij met een AI-assistent? ontdek je hoe je effectief prompt. Ook met AI-chatbots die steeds meer zelfstandige AI-assistenten worden.
• In de e-learning Bewust aan de slag met AI leer je waar je op moet letten als je met AI gaat werken en welke invloed het op je werk kan hebben. Welke wetten gelden er over AI-gebruik? En wat kan AI voor de toekomst van ons werk betekenen?

Met deze e-learnings leer je als overheidsmedewerker effectiever om te gaan met AI. Verder krijg je inzicht in waar de kansen en risico’s voor de overheid liggen. De trainingen worden gratis aangeboden aan overheidsorganisaties van zowel het Rijk, provincies, waterschappen en gemeenten.

Transparantieverplichtingen voor AI-systemen van kracht

Sinds 2 augustus 2026 gelden op grond van de AI-verordening nieuwe transparantieverplichtingen voor AI-systemen. Gebruik je als overheidsorganisatie een AI-systeem? Bijvoorbeeld een chatbot op je website, of AI om beeld, audio of tekst te genereren. Dan moet in bepaalde situaties duidelijk zijn dat AI is gebruikt. Zo weten mensen beter wanneer ze te maken hebben met AI-gegenereerde of AI-bewerkte content.

Transparantieverplichtingen AI-systemen

De transparantieverplichtingen gelden bijvoorbeeld wanneer:

• iemand in contact komt met een chatbot;
• beeld, video of audio met AI is gegenereerd of bewerkt, en een deepfake vormt;
• AI-gegenereerde of bewerkte tekst wordt gebruikt om informatie van algemeen belang te verspreiden;
• AI wordt ingezet voor emotieherkenning of biometrische categorisering.

Bij bijvoorbeeld deepfakes moet een zichtbaar label op de afbeelding duidelijk maken dat deze AI-gegenereerd is. Daarvoor heeft de EU deze pictogrammen uitgebracht.

Uitzonderingen

Er zijn ook uitzonderingen. Zo hoef je het gebruik van AI niet te melden wanneer het alleen wordt gebruikt voor standaardbewerkingen, zoals spellingcontrole of het verbeteren van de helderheid van een foto. Ook geldt de verplichting in sommige gevallen niet wanneer een mens de eindredactie voert en verantwoordelijkheid draagt voor de uiteindelijke inhoud.

De nieuwe regels moeten ervoor zorgen dat mensen weten wanneer ze met AI te maken hebben. Zo kunnen ze beter beoordelen hoe content tot stand is gekomen en wanneer AI is toegepast. Meer weten over de transparantieverplichtingen voor AI-systemen? Bekijk onze pagina Regels AI-modellen voor algemene doeleinden, of de website van de Europese Commissie. Of mail je vraag naar [email protected].

E-learnings AI voor overheidsmedewerkers

Tegelijkertijd verplicht de AI-verordening overheidsorganisaties te investeren in AI-geletterdheid. Overheidsmedewerkers moeten voldoende kennis en vaardigheden hebben om AI-systemen op een weloverwogen, verantwoorde en effectieve manier te gebruiken. Daarom heeft de RijksAcademie voor Digitalisering en Informatisering Overheid (RADIO) 2 nieuwe e-learnings ontwikkeld voor overheidsmedewerkers. Deze bouwen voort op de Basisopleiding AI Digitaal Vakmanschap.

• In de e-learning Hoe werk jij met een AI-assistent? ontdek je hoe je effectief prompt. Ook met AI-chatbots die steeds meer zelfstandige AI-assistenten worden.
• In de e-learning Bewust aan de slag met AI leer je waar je op moet letten als je met AI gaat werken en welke invloed het op je werk kan hebben. Welke wetten gelden er over AI-gebruik? En wat kan AI voor de toekomst van ons werk betekenen?

Met deze e-learnings leer je als overheidsmedewerker effectiever om te gaan met AI. Verder krijg je inzicht in waar de kansen en risico’s voor de overheid liggen. De trainingen worden gratis aangeboden aan overheidsorganisaties van zowel het Rijk, provincies, waterschappen en gemeenten.

Как приручить LLM

- Пробовали сделать цифрового сотрудника на LLM? - У вас получилось? - Долго старались? - Насколько он качественный? - Сколько он стоит в обслуживании? Очень много вопросов возникает к технологии ведения диалогов нейросетями.

https://habr.com/ru/articles/1066298/

#LLM #Chatbot #Conversational_AI #AI_Agents #Prompt_Engineering #Responses_API #Structured_Output #Software_Architecture #Open_Source

The support email address for #qobuz is [email protected] for other users. It can't be found online and you have to waste time with some unnecessary support chat bot. So hope this post gets indexed by search engines, so it's a more frictionless experience for future users seeking the support.

#AISlop #chatbot

The support email address for #qobuz is [email protected] for other users. It can't be found online and you have to waste time with some unnecessary support chat bot. So hope this post gets indexed by search engines, so it's a more frictionless experience for future users seeking the support.

#AISlop #chatbot

Les #IA vont-elles tuer les #hyperliens ces briques fondamentales du #Web ?
https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2026/08/02/les-ia-vont-elles-tuer-les-liens-hypertextes-ces-briques-fondamentales-du-web_6737265_4408996.html
Une étude de l’université Columbia démontre que des services comme #ChatGPT #Perplexity #DeepSeek #Grok #Gemini ont tendance à inventer des liens
Et puis pourquoi le #chatbot a-t-il sélectionné ce lien plutôt qu’un autre ? C’est une synthèse dont on ignore exactement les sources mobilisées, et donc les biais. Il n’y a pas de traçabilité ou de transparence #valerie_schaefer

Les #IA vont-elles tuer les #hyperliens ces briques fondamentales du #Web ?
https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2026/08/02/les-ia-vont-elles-tuer-les-liens-hypertextes-ces-briques-fondamentales-du-web_6737265_4408996.html
Une étude de l’université Columbia démontre que des services comme #ChatGPT #Perplexity #DeepSeek #Grok #Gemini ont tendance à inventer des liens
Et puis pourquoi le #chatbot a-t-il sélectionné ce lien plutôt qu’un autre ? C’est une synthèse dont on ignore exactement les sources mobilisées, et donc les biais. Il n’y a pas de traçabilité ou de transparence #valerie_schaefer

An ‘AI-generated’ label becomes mandatory in the EU.

The EU’s comprehensive AI law enters into force in stages.

From Sunday, companies must ensure their AI systems like chatbots make it clear to users they are AI, or when an image or text has been created using AI, there must be a label saying so.

https://mediafaro.org/article/20260802-an-ai-generated-label-becomes-mandatory-in-the-eu?mf_channel=mastodon&action=forward

#EU #AI #Tech #AILaw #Chatbot #LLM #Deepfakes #Disinformation