home.social

#ecologically — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #ecologically, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Okay. #BTC is a bad coin because it's terrible #ecologically and because it is #POW it is just much more #oligarchically structured than more modern #architectures. I'm designing my own #intelligence #grid. I'll run it right on T-Mobile's highest network encrypted. #Blockchains included.

  2. #introduction

    "Shelter!" is an initiative for free public overnight-shelters. I am developing it while studying M.A. #Gestaltung at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts #Bielefeld. There is also a project-website: shelter.apgw.de

    It is about #infrastructure as #art: For #climate-friendly travels. For local #microadventures. #Socially inclusive and #ecologically reasonable.

    I like to see many new public shelter-spaces and trekking-places and I want to build shelters together with you, e.g. on public meadows at the edge of cities.

    That's also a bit egoistic because I like to experience self-efficacy while building it, and in the best case, make it experiencable for others, too.

    Inspiration and motivation is the impressive culture of public fresh air #tourism in #Denmark. There are hundreds of trekking-places for up to two nights, often with wooden shelter-huts. And: You are allowed to place your tent beside of them, if they are already taken...

    udinaturen.dk/kort/?region=81,

    #Trekking #Bikepacking #Biketravels #Bike #Hiking #Commons

    #PleaseBoost (if you like to)

  3. #introduction

    "Shelter!" is an initiative for free public overnight-shelters. I am developing it while studying M.A. #Gestaltung at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts #Bielefeld. There is also a project-website: shelter.apgw.de

    It is about #infrastructure as #art: For #climate-friendly travels. For local #microadventures. #Socially inclusive and #ecologically reasonable.

    I like to see many new public shelter-spaces and trekking-places and I want to build shelters together with you, e.g. on public meadows at the edge of cities.

    That's also a bit egoistic because I like to experience self-efficacy while building it, and in the best case, make it experiencable for others, too.

    Inspiration and motivation is the impressive culture of public fresh air #tourism in #Denmark. There are hundreds of trekking-places for up to two nights, often with wooden shelter-huts. And: You are allowed to place your tent beside of them, if they are already taken...

    udinaturen.dk/kort/?region=81,

    #Trekking #Bikepacking #Biketravels #Bike #Hiking #Commons

    #PleaseBoost (if you like to)

  4. #introduction

    "Shelter!" is an initiative for free public overnight-shelters. I am developing it while studying M.A. #Gestaltung at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts #Bielefeld. There is also a project-website: shelter.apgw.de

    It is about #infrastructure as #art: For #climate-friendly travels. For local #microadventures. #Socially inclusive and #ecologically reasonable.

    I like to see many new public shelter-spaces and trekking-places and I want to build shelters together with you, e.g. on public meadows at the edge of cities.

    That's also a bit egoistic because I like to experience self-efficacy while building it, and in the best case, make it experiencable for others, too.

    Inspiration and motivation is the impressive culture of public fresh air #tourism in #Denmark. There are hundreds of trekking-places for up to two nights, often with wooden shelter-huts. And: You are allowed to place your tent beside of them, if they are already taken...

    udinaturen.dk/kort/?region=81,

    #Trekking #Bikepacking #Biketravels #Bike #Hiking #Commons

    #PleaseBoost (if you like to)

  5. #introduction

    "Shelter!" is an initiative for free public overnight-shelters. I am developing it while studying M.A. #Gestaltung at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts #Bielefeld. There is also a project-website: shelter.apgw.de

    It is about #infrastructure as #art: For #climate-friendly travels. For local #microadventures. #Socially inclusive and #ecologically reasonable.

    I like to see many new public shelter-spaces and trekking-places and I want to build shelters together with you, e.g. on public meadows at the edge of cities.

    That's also a bit egoistic because I like to experience self-efficacy while building it, and in the best case, make it experiencable for others, too.

    Inspiration and motivation is the impressive culture of public fresh air #tourism in #Denmark. There are hundreds of trekking-places for up to two nights, often with wooden shelter-huts. And: You are allowed to place your tent beside of them, if they are already taken...

    udinaturen.dk/kort/?region=81,

    #Trekking #Bikepacking #Biketravels #Bike #Hiking #Commons

    #PleaseBoost (if you like to)

  6. #introduction

    "Shelter!" is an initiative for free public overnight-shelters. I am developing it while studying M.A. #Gestaltung at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts #Bielefeld. There is also a project-website: shelter.apgw.de

    It is about #infrastructure as #art: For #climate-friendly travels. For local #microadventures. #Socially inclusive and #ecologically reasonable.

    I like to see many new public shelter-spaces and trekking-places and I want to build shelters together with you, e.g. on public meadows at the edge of cities.

    That's also a bit egoistic because I like to experience self-efficacy while building it, and in the best case, make it experiencable for others, too.

    Inspiration and motivation is the impressive culture of public fresh air #tourism in #Denmark. There are hundreds of trekking-places for up to two nights, often with wooden shelter-huts. And: You are allowed to place your tent beside of them, if they are already taken...

    udinaturen.dk/kort/?region=81,

    #Trekking #Bikepacking #Biketravels #Bike #Hiking #Commons

    #PleaseBoost (if you like to)

  7. RE: mastodon.social/@sflorg/115729

    This is an interesting article (linked below) about #biodiversity and #populationdynamics of #microscopic #seafloorfauna elements, and their presumed modes of #dispersal and ability to adapt to far away #ecologically different conditions. It focuses on the nematode genus #Halalaimus.
    I want to point out that even terrestrial nematodes are masters of interesting #dispersalstrategies, evolved based on their small sizes and limited distance #mobility.

    This text by #StefanFWirth, Berlin, 2025

  8. RE: mastodon.social/@sflorg/115729

    This is an interesting article (linked below) about #biodiversity and #populationdynamics of #microscopic #seafloorfauna elements, and their presumed modes of #dispersal and ability to adapt to far away #ecologically different conditions. It focuses on the nematode genus #Halalaimus.
    I want to point out that even terrestrial nematodes are masters of interesting #dispersalstrategies, evolved based on their small sizes and limited distance #mobility.

    This text by #StefanFWirth, Berlin, 2025

  9. RE: mastodon.social/@sflorg/115729

    This is an interesting article (linked below) about #biodiversity and #populationdynamics of #microscopic #seafloorfauna elements, and their presumed modes of #dispersal and ability to adapt to far away #ecologically different conditions. It focuses on the nematode genus #Halalaimus.
    I want to point out that even terrestrial nematodes are masters of interesting #dispersalstrategies, evolved based on their small sizes and limited distance #mobility.

    This text by #StefanFWirth, Berlin, 2025

  10. RE: mastodon.social/@sflorg/115729

    This is an interesting article (linked below) about #biodiversity and #populationdynamics of #microscopic #seafloorfauna elements, and their presumed modes of #dispersal and ability to adapt to far away #ecologically different conditions. It focuses on the nematode genus #Halalaimus.
    I want to point out that even terrestrial nematodes are masters of interesting #dispersalstrategies, evolved based on their small sizes and limited distance #mobility.

    This text by #StefanFWirth, Berlin, 2025

  11. RE: mastodon.social/@sflorg/115729

    This is an interesting article (linked below) about #biodiversity and #populationdynamics of #microscopic #seafloorfauna elements, and their presumed modes of #dispersal and ability to adapt to far away #ecologically different conditions. It focuses on the nematode genus #Halalaimus.
    I want to point out that even terrestrial nematodes are masters of interesting #dispersalstrategies, evolved based on their small sizes and limited distance #mobility.

    This text by #StefanFWirth, Berlin, 2025

  12. The #Gleisdreieck #urbanpark in #Berlin, opened in its current form in 2014, is located on the former #wasteland of two old #railway stations. It consists of three #parksections stretching from the Kreuzberg district to Schöneberg. In addition to sports and leisure facilities, it also features restaurants and #ecologically diverse #greenspaces with remarkable #urban #biodiversity.

    © #StefanFWirth Berlin 2025

    Further Reading

    E. Zaykova (2021):
    dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202

    #Photos
    © S F. Wirth

  13. The #Gleisdreieck #urbanpark in #Berlin, opened in its current form in 2014, is located on the former #wasteland of two old #railway stations. It consists of three #parksections stretching from the Kreuzberg district to Schöneberg. In addition to sports and leisure facilities, it also features restaurants and #ecologically diverse #greenspaces with remarkable #urban #biodiversity.

    © #StefanFWirth Berlin 2025

    Further Reading

    E. Zaykova (2021):
    dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202

    #Photos
    © S F. Wirth

  14. The #Gleisdreieck #urbanpark in #Berlin, opened in its current form in 2014, is located on the former #wasteland of two old #railway stations. It consists of three #parksections stretching from the Kreuzberg district to Schöneberg. In addition to sports and leisure facilities, it also features restaurants and #ecologically diverse #greenspaces with remarkable #urban #biodiversity.

    © #StefanFWirth Berlin 2025

    Further Reading

    E. Zaykova (2021):
    dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202

    #Photos
    © S F. Wirth

  15. The #Gleisdreieck #urbanpark in #Berlin, opened in its current form in 2014, is located on the former #wasteland of two old #railway stations. It consists of three #parksections stretching from the Kreuzberg district to Schöneberg. In addition to sports and leisure facilities, it also features restaurants and #ecologically diverse #greenspaces with remarkable #urban #biodiversity.

    © #StefanFWirth Berlin 2025

    Further Reading

    E. Zaykova (2021):
    dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202

    #Photos
    © S F. Wirth

  16. The #Gleisdreieck #urbanpark in #Berlin, opened in its current form in 2014, is located on the former #wasteland of two old #railway stations. It consists of three #parksections stretching from the Kreuzberg district to Schöneberg. In addition to sports and leisure facilities, it also features restaurants and #ecologically diverse #greenspaces with remarkable #urban #biodiversity.

    © #StefanFWirth Berlin 2025

    Further Reading

    E. Zaykova (2021):
    dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202

    #Photos
    © S F. Wirth

  17. 🌱 At #HofUniversity, #Sustainability is a way of life! With the launch of our new website on #GreenTech, we highlight our commitment to #SustainableDevelopment#ecologically, #socially & #economically. Explore how we take responsibility and drive change on #campus and beyond. 🌍💡 Learn more: t1p.de/v4dr8

  18. CW: #Commercialisation ... of #TV 📺 #Internet 🌐 (Adverts in Everything)

    #Commercialisation ...of #TV 📺 #Internet 🌐 ...and Earth 🌎
    (and Adverts in Everything!)

    Like the diluting of what was once pure, it then gets watered down or advert-packed to keep us watching... (... adverts).

    That's what this is about mainly:

    " #Maximising " things and cashing it in towards their death (inevitably pushing and killing things after helping feed or creat them - steady profiting more and more as time goes on).

    THE REST BELOW EXPANDS ON THAT - ABOVE IS THE MAIN

    ⏺️ DISCLAIMER 1
    While everything was "pure" before (or geeky or niche or even rarely practices) was always going to do bigger things the more interest there was building for it. So I accept even the Internet itself from modems and BBS Bulletin board system to broadband you people enjoy (I'm almost still on modems lol!) means that commercialisation was inevitable and mostly needed EVEN THOUGH the TONS of money and $tate infrastructure is charging planet and us PLENTY for the broadband-drug streaming to us per month which companies can increase price or adverts into our addiction-filled lives - so adverts are naturally with that... [shrug] ...especially as they test and find tolerance levels...

    ⏺️ ❓ What's your golden period? ❓
    "THE" golden period I think of is the 2000's as we had the best of everything, early broadband or even just before with personally crafted crappy custom HTML sites, ecologic internet (telephone lines and modem) and less addiction (lower baud speeds) etc etc - 1 film a day MAX! Ok maybe a bit more on braodband but picking and choosing was good as naturally any human goes out of control with 'all you can eat' entertainment...

    ⏺️ BACK TO TODAY
    Blogs becoming the same kind of advert rolls in between text (or is it text in between advert rolls), now each page is almost the same copy and pasted version or setup perfecting what was the SEO search engine with keywords and other tactics so everything now looks the same for anything non-Wikipedia or other than official pages. Now the system is too good and technical availability being taken advantage of at the cost of quality or even genuine interest (it's all just for money isn't it?)

    ⏺️ SOMEONE ELSE'S COMMENT JUST MENTIONED IN PASSING...
    A comment by @GhostOnTheHalfShell / GhostOnTheHalfShell's affirms some of these types of things that happen to a TV series that "slowly was crushed by never increasing commercial schedule, which is to say that the show barely had any content"
    Post: masto.ai/@GhostOnTheHalfShell/

    ⏺️ DISCLAIMER 2:
    I admit content being drawn out and advert-filled doesn't mean the quality or worth is always less (#NationalGeographic #Wildlife TV stuff I'm thinking of where you can get tea in between or really do something else and come back to it when it gets interesting again). Even if overall the enjoyment process is changed it doesn't make it instantly crap... And since TV back then, the downloading of episodes (TV had unavoidable adverts back then)... which was solved temporarily until streaming came along and it's like being back on TV but via internet with it's tracking engines and more!

    but anyway....

    ⏺️ OVERALL yes the feeling is that *feeding* #habits also becomes too much, too pure, too watered down or whatever too much... too much is bad, too much is too much... whoever is supplying it and we have to say no / I need less / I have to moderate it to only *this* part of my life which is hard with 'educational things' especially that turn out to be EVERYTHING!

    ⏺️ ❓ I hope it all amounts to something and we do get #wiser and more #ECOLOGICALLY #practical, more than #capitalist consuming and find ways to trap people to watch adverts or be tracked in our online habits...

  19. #Degrowth and #Socialism: Notes on Some Critical Junctures

    by Güney Işıkara and Özgür Narin

    "Most degrowth thinkers agree that growth, as both a fact and a concept, is brought about by #capitalism. It is even acknowledged that growth is not the driver, but an outcome, the “surface appearance or ‘fetish’ of an underlying process: capital accumulation.” One would then expect that the challenge to it and the imaginary of an alternative society would be based on the negation of capitalism as a mode of production. Yet instead, growth remains the focal point of the discussion.

    "The emphasis on growth as an aggregate phenomenon that emerged only with industrial capitalism and turned into an unquestionable economic paradigm following the Second World War is not trivial. It implies that growth as we know it is capitalist growth, or actually accumulation of capital, constituted in processes of exploitation and expropriation peculiar to capitalism, measured by indicators designed by and for capitalist societies. Why should we then be so concerned with growth as such from the viewpoint of a socialist (or #postcapitalist) society? The degrowth position is that it mesmerizes and captivates individual and social imaginaries, political movements, parties, and projects, including that of socialism: “Growth is the child of capitalism, but the child outdid the parent, with the pursuit of growth surviving the abolition of capitalist relations in socialist countries.”

    "The transplantation of growth from its capitalist historical context into a socialist future, and thereby the problematization of growth as such—which supposedly transcends social relations upon which societies are founded—can be justified only under one condition: if all growth, regardless of the underlying relations of humans to both humans and nonhuman natures, can be seen as homogeneous, or at least alike to a significant degree. This is precisely what Giorgos Kallis puts forward: 'socialist growth cannot be sustainable, because no economic growth can be #ecologically #sustainable. Growth in the #material standard of living requires growth in the #extraction of materials. This is unavoidably damaging to the environment and ultimately undermines the conditions of production and reproduction.”

    "The logical conclusion of this argument is that all human activity involving extraction, transformation, and use of materials—that is, all human reproduction—is in direct conflict with the environment as the former unavoidably damages the latter. This is a reversion to crude materialism founded on the oppositional binary of nature and society. According to Kallis, this conflict becomes #unsustainable if material living standards keep growing. Growth, however, is still understood in its meaning in the capitalist context, representing a process of accumulation.

    "The qualitative difference between socialism and capitalism as two distinct modes of production is highly relevant here. The primary function of production under socialism is to provide all citizens with use values to satisfy a universal standard of basic needs (essentials), which determines the length of the necessary working day. This comprises not only shelter, basic food items, clean water supply, health care, education, and accessible public transport, but also child and elder care, parks and recreation, basic cultural and informational services, (possibly) ecological restoration activities, and the like."

    Read more:
    monthlyreview.org/2023/07/01/d

  20. #Degrowth and #Socialism: Notes on Some Critical Junctures

    by Güney Işıkara and Özgür Narin

    "Most degrowth thinkers agree that growth, as both a fact and a concept, is brought about by #capitalism. It is even acknowledged that growth is not the driver, but an outcome, the “surface appearance or ‘fetish’ of an underlying process: capital accumulation.” One would then expect that the challenge to it and the imaginary of an alternative society would be based on the negation of capitalism as a mode of production. Yet instead, growth remains the focal point of the discussion.

    "The emphasis on growth as an aggregate phenomenon that emerged only with industrial capitalism and turned into an unquestionable economic paradigm following the Second World War is not trivial. It implies that growth as we know it is capitalist growth, or actually accumulation of capital, constituted in processes of exploitation and expropriation peculiar to capitalism, measured by indicators designed by and for capitalist societies. Why should we then be so concerned with growth as such from the viewpoint of a socialist (or #postcapitalist) society? The degrowth position is that it mesmerizes and captivates individual and social imaginaries, political movements, parties, and projects, including that of socialism: “Growth is the child of capitalism, but the child outdid the parent, with the pursuit of growth surviving the abolition of capitalist relations in socialist countries.”

    "The transplantation of growth from its capitalist historical context into a socialist future, and thereby the problematization of growth as such—which supposedly transcends social relations upon which societies are founded—can be justified only under one condition: if all growth, regardless of the underlying relations of humans to both humans and nonhuman natures, can be seen as homogeneous, or at least alike to a significant degree. This is precisely what Giorgos Kallis puts forward: 'socialist growth cannot be sustainable, because no economic growth can be #ecologically #sustainable. Growth in the #material standard of living requires growth in the #extraction of materials. This is unavoidably damaging to the environment and ultimately undermines the conditions of production and reproduction.”

    "The logical conclusion of this argument is that all human activity involving extraction, transformation, and use of materials—that is, all human reproduction—is in direct conflict with the environment as the former unavoidably damages the latter. This is a reversion to crude materialism founded on the oppositional binary of nature and society. According to Kallis, this conflict becomes #unsustainable if material living standards keep growing. Growth, however, is still understood in its meaning in the capitalist context, representing a process of accumulation.

    "The qualitative difference between socialism and capitalism as two distinct modes of production is highly relevant here. The primary function of production under socialism is to provide all citizens with use values to satisfy a universal standard of basic needs (essentials), which determines the length of the necessary working day. This comprises not only shelter, basic food items, clean water supply, health care, education, and accessible public transport, but also child and elder care, parks and recreation, basic cultural and informational services, (possibly) ecological restoration activities, and the like."

    Read more:
    monthlyreview.org/2023/07/01/d

  21. #Degrowth and #Socialism: Notes on Some Critical Junctures

    by Güney Işıkara and Özgür Narin

    "Most degrowth thinkers agree that growth, as both a fact and a concept, is brought about by #capitalism. It is even acknowledged that growth is not the driver, but an outcome, the “surface appearance or ‘fetish’ of an underlying process: capital accumulation.” One would then expect that the challenge to it and the imaginary of an alternative society would be based on the negation of capitalism as a mode of production. Yet instead, growth remains the focal point of the discussion.

    "The emphasis on growth as an aggregate phenomenon that emerged only with industrial capitalism and turned into an unquestionable economic paradigm following the Second World War is not trivial. It implies that growth as we know it is capitalist growth, or actually accumulation of capital, constituted in processes of exploitation and expropriation peculiar to capitalism, measured by indicators designed by and for capitalist societies. Why should we then be so concerned with growth as such from the viewpoint of a socialist (or #postcapitalist) society? The degrowth position is that it mesmerizes and captivates individual and social imaginaries, political movements, parties, and projects, including that of socialism: “Growth is the child of capitalism, but the child outdid the parent, with the pursuit of growth surviving the abolition of capitalist relations in socialist countries.”

    "The transplantation of growth from its capitalist historical context into a socialist future, and thereby the problematization of growth as such—which supposedly transcends social relations upon which societies are founded—can be justified only under one condition: if all growth, regardless of the underlying relations of humans to both humans and nonhuman natures, can be seen as homogeneous, or at least alike to a significant degree. This is precisely what Giorgos Kallis puts forward: 'socialist growth cannot be sustainable, because no economic growth can be #ecologically #sustainable. Growth in the #material standard of living requires growth in the #extraction of materials. This is unavoidably damaging to the environment and ultimately undermines the conditions of production and reproduction.”

    "The logical conclusion of this argument is that all human activity involving extraction, transformation, and use of materials—that is, all human reproduction—is in direct conflict with the environment as the former unavoidably damages the latter. This is a reversion to crude materialism founded on the oppositional binary of nature and society. According to Kallis, this conflict becomes #unsustainable if material living standards keep growing. Growth, however, is still understood in its meaning in the capitalist context, representing a process of accumulation.

    "The qualitative difference between socialism and capitalism as two distinct modes of production is highly relevant here. The primary function of production under socialism is to provide all citizens with use values to satisfy a universal standard of basic needs (essentials), which determines the length of the necessary working day. This comprises not only shelter, basic food items, clean water supply, health care, education, and accessible public transport, but also child and elder care, parks and recreation, basic cultural and informational services, (possibly) ecological restoration activities, and the like."

    Read more:
    monthlyreview.org/2023/07/01/d

  22. #Degrowth and #Socialism: Notes on Some Critical Junctures

    by Güney Işıkara and Özgür Narin

    "Most degrowth thinkers agree that growth, as both a fact and a concept, is brought about by #capitalism. It is even acknowledged that growth is not the driver, but an outcome, the “surface appearance or ‘fetish’ of an underlying process: capital accumulation.” One would then expect that the challenge to it and the imaginary of an alternative society would be based on the negation of capitalism as a mode of production. Yet instead, growth remains the focal point of the discussion.

    "The emphasis on growth as an aggregate phenomenon that emerged only with industrial capitalism and turned into an unquestionable economic paradigm following the Second World War is not trivial. It implies that growth as we know it is capitalist growth, or actually accumulation of capital, constituted in processes of exploitation and expropriation peculiar to capitalism, measured by indicators designed by and for capitalist societies. Why should we then be so concerned with growth as such from the viewpoint of a socialist (or #postcapitalist) society? The degrowth position is that it mesmerizes and captivates individual and social imaginaries, political movements, parties, and projects, including that of socialism: “Growth is the child of capitalism, but the child outdid the parent, with the pursuit of growth surviving the abolition of capitalist relations in socialist countries.”

    "The transplantation of growth from its capitalist historical context into a socialist future, and thereby the problematization of growth as such—which supposedly transcends social relations upon which societies are founded—can be justified only under one condition: if all growth, regardless of the underlying relations of humans to both humans and nonhuman natures, can be seen as homogeneous, or at least alike to a significant degree. This is precisely what Giorgos Kallis puts forward: 'socialist growth cannot be sustainable, because no economic growth can be #ecologically #sustainable. Growth in the #material standard of living requires growth in the #extraction of materials. This is unavoidably damaging to the environment and ultimately undermines the conditions of production and reproduction.”

    "The logical conclusion of this argument is that all human activity involving extraction, transformation, and use of materials—that is, all human reproduction—is in direct conflict with the environment as the former unavoidably damages the latter. This is a reversion to crude materialism founded on the oppositional binary of nature and society. According to Kallis, this conflict becomes #unsustainable if material living standards keep growing. Growth, however, is still understood in its meaning in the capitalist context, representing a process of accumulation.

    "The qualitative difference between socialism and capitalism as two distinct modes of production is highly relevant here. The primary function of production under socialism is to provide all citizens with use values to satisfy a universal standard of basic needs (essentials), which determines the length of the necessary working day. This comprises not only shelter, basic food items, clean water supply, health care, education, and accessible public transport, but also child and elder care, parks and recreation, basic cultural and informational services, (possibly) ecological restoration activities, and the like."

    Read more:
    monthlyreview.org/2023/07/01/d

  23. #Degrowth and #Socialism: Notes on Some Critical Junctures

    by Güney Işıkara and Özgür Narin

    "Most degrowth thinkers agree that growth, as both a fact and a concept, is brought about by #capitalism. It is even acknowledged that growth is not the driver, but an outcome, the “surface appearance or ‘fetish’ of an underlying process: capital accumulation.” One would then expect that the challenge to it and the imaginary of an alternative society would be based on the negation of capitalism as a mode of production. Yet instead, growth remains the focal point of the discussion.

    "The emphasis on growth as an aggregate phenomenon that emerged only with industrial capitalism and turned into an unquestionable economic paradigm following the Second World War is not trivial. It implies that growth as we know it is capitalist growth, or actually accumulation of capital, constituted in processes of exploitation and expropriation peculiar to capitalism, measured by indicators designed by and for capitalist societies. Why should we then be so concerned with growth as such from the viewpoint of a socialist (or #postcapitalist) society? The degrowth position is that it mesmerizes and captivates individual and social imaginaries, political movements, parties, and projects, including that of socialism: “Growth is the child of capitalism, but the child outdid the parent, with the pursuit of growth surviving the abolition of capitalist relations in socialist countries.”

    "The transplantation of growth from its capitalist historical context into a socialist future, and thereby the problematization of growth as such—which supposedly transcends social relations upon which societies are founded—can be justified only under one condition: if all growth, regardless of the underlying relations of humans to both humans and nonhuman natures, can be seen as homogeneous, or at least alike to a significant degree. This is precisely what Giorgos Kallis puts forward: 'socialist growth cannot be sustainable, because no economic growth can be #ecologically #sustainable. Growth in the #material standard of living requires growth in the #extraction of materials. This is unavoidably damaging to the environment and ultimately undermines the conditions of production and reproduction.”

    "The logical conclusion of this argument is that all human activity involving extraction, transformation, and use of materials—that is, all human reproduction—is in direct conflict with the environment as the former unavoidably damages the latter. This is a reversion to crude materialism founded on the oppositional binary of nature and society. According to Kallis, this conflict becomes #unsustainable if material living standards keep growing. Growth, however, is still understood in its meaning in the capitalist context, representing a process of accumulation.

    "The qualitative difference between socialism and capitalism as two distinct modes of production is highly relevant here. The primary function of production under socialism is to provide all citizens with use values to satisfy a universal standard of basic needs (essentials), which determines the length of the necessary working day. This comprises not only shelter, basic food items, clean water supply, health care, education, and accessible public transport, but also child and elder care, parks and recreation, basic cultural and informational services, (possibly) ecological restoration activities, and the like."

    Read more:
    monthlyreview.org/2023/07/01/d

  24. #Mass #Car #Ownership began in the late 1960s.
    It will end in the late 2030s.
    Car ownership will simply be unaffordable for most people.
    NOW is the time for countries to #Invest heavily in cheap, #Ecologically #Responsible, #Public #Transport, and to make cities #Walkable.

    #Buses #Trams #Trains

    Later will be too late.

  25. #Mass #Car #Ownership began in the late 1960s.
    It will end in the late 2030s.
    Car ownership will simply be unaffordable for most people.
    NOW is the time for countries to #Invest heavily in cheap, #Ecologically #Responsible, #Public #Transport, and to make cities #Walkable.

    #Buses #Trams #Trains

    Later will be too late.

  26. #Mass #Car #Ownership began in the late 1960s.
    It will end in the late 2030s.
    Car ownership will simply be unaffordable for most people.
    NOW is the time for countries to #Invest heavily in cheap, #Ecologically #Responsible, #Public #Transport, and to make cities #Walkable.

    #Buses #Trams #Trains

    Later will be too late.

  27. #Mass #Car #Ownership began in the late 1960s.
    It will end in the late 2030s.
    Car ownership will simply be unaffordable for most people.
    NOW is the time for countries to #Invest heavily in cheap, #Ecologically #Responsible, #Public #Transport, and to make cities #Walkable.

    #Buses #Trams #Trains

    Later will be too late.

  28. #Mass #Car #Ownership began in the late 1960s.
    It will end in the late 2030s.
    Car ownership will simply be unaffordable for most people.
    NOW is the time for countries to #Invest heavily in cheap, #Ecologically #Responsible, #Public #Transport, and to make cities #Walkable.

    #Buses #Trams #Trains

    Later will be too late.