home.social

#individualism — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #individualism, aggregated by home.social.

  1. hello everyone! my name is Rusty, but i also go by the names Alex, Alexander, and Hamilton!
    I am a host of The Hamilplex/Alexander Hamilton's Jury, a mixed origin system of over 245k!
    my pronouns are He/It/Vamp/Star/Pup
    i am orientationfull, but mainly omniromantic, aroace spec, bi/gay/lesboy
    i am a nonhuman creature (Otherkin + other kin labels)
    im currently reorganizing my kinlist so i will link it here when its done!
    #1 Hamilton fan (obvi)
    I kin Alexander Hamilton. both his musical counterpart and his historical coutnerpart, however i experince it (and my other human kins) in a nonhuman way
    my other headmates will post here and will mark if theyre posting, but i wont :p
    im currently dating Cameron, host of The Striped Heathers System! (they dont have any fedi accs)
    i use very controversial labels other than the ones mentioned, but theres too many to put here x_x
    Green/Eco, Queer, Feminist, Transhumanist, Individualist, Techno, Communist, Anarchist (like im anarcho- of all of them)
    "Capitalism and Authoritarian Communist are just 2 sides of the same coin. Fascism and Nationalism are the ring that bind them together" - Matthew, another host in this system
    Theistic Satanist and Earth Religionist
    if you have any questions, just ask!
    #introduction

    edit: adding more tags x_x
    #hamilton #anarchism #communist #individualism #transhumanism #greenanarchy #greenanarchism #queer #lgbt #lgbtqia2s #feminism #TERFsDNI #disabled #autism #adhd #ocd #anxiety #StPD #npd #avpd #PPD (Paranoid PD), #hpd #dysgraphia #dyspraxia #questioningdyscalculia #ptsd
    #controversiallabels #objectshows #osc #objectshowcommunity #MCR #fabulouskilljoy #greenday #americanidiot #artist #mccaffrey #anticapitalism #antifascist #antifascism #antiauthoritarian #antiauthoritariancommunism #weird #amweirdguy
    i will add more tags when i can lol

  2. hello everyone! my name is Rusty, but i also go by the names Alex, Alexander, and Hamilton!
    I am a host of The Hamilplex/Alexander Hamilton's Jury, a mixed origin system of over 245k!
    my pronouns are He/It/Vamp/Star/Pup
    i am orientationfull, but mainly omniromantic, aroace spec, bi/gay/lesboy
    i am a nonhuman creature (Otherkin + other kin labels)
    im currently reorganizing my kinlist so i will link it here when its done!
    #1 Hamilton fan (obvi)
    I kin Alexander Hamilton. both his musical counterpart and his historical coutnerpart, however i experince it (and my other human kins) in a nonhuman way
    my other headmates will post here and will mark if theyre posting, but i wont :p
    im currently dating Cameron, host of The Striped Heathers System! (they dont have any fedi accs)
    i use very controversial labels other than the ones mentioned, but theres too many to put here x_x
    Green/Eco, Queer, Feminist, Transhumanist, Individualist, Techno, Communist, Anarchist (like im anarcho- of all of them)
    "Capitalism and Authoritarian Communist are just 2 sides of the same coin. Fascism and Nationalism are the ring that bind them together" - Matthew, another host in this system
    Theistic Satanist and Earth Religionist
    if you have any questions, just ask!
    #introduction

    edit: adding more tags x_x
    #hamilton #anarchism #communist #individualism #transhumanism #greenanarchy #greenanarchism #queer #lgbt #lgbtqia2s #feminism #TERFsDNI #disabled #autism #adhd #ocd #anxiety #StPD #npd #avpd #PPD (Paranoid PD), #hpd #dysgraphia #dyspraxia #questioningdyscalculia #ptsd
    #controversiallabels #objectshows #osc #objectshowcommunity #MCR #fabulouskilljoy #greenday #americanidiot #artist #mccaffrey #anticapitalism #antifascist #antifascism #antiauthoritarian #antiauthoritariancommunism #weird #amweirdguy
    i will add more tags when i can lol

  3. "It’s not so much that there’s 50-something percent of the country that is committed to Trumpism. But there’s just a huge amount of the country that is not doing well—and I mean that in an emotional way, I mean that in a political way, civically."

    #Trump #MAGA #SocialContract #individualism #CommonGood #solidarity
    /2

  4. "If we don’t take seriously some of these more underlying problems—that we are a deeply isolated and lonely and distrustful country that is focused on material wellbeing and status and is more dislocated and civically apathetic than maybe we’ve ever been—we’re going to get more Trumps, because that’s just fertile breeding ground for people like him."

    ~ Alan Elrod

    #Trump #MAGA #SocialContract #individualism #CommonGood #solidarity
    /1

    newrepublic.com/article/208976

  5. A quotation from Thoreau

    If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.

    Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) American philosopher and writer
    Walden; or, Life in the Woods, ch. 18 “Conclusion” (1854)

    More about this quote: wist.info/thoreau-henry-david/…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #thoreau #henrydavidthoreau #differentdrummer #dissident #eccentricity #heterogeneity #independence #individualism #individuality #inspiration #meme #nonconformist #pace #selfdirection #tempo #time #unconventionality #uniqueness #difference

  6. Every social system built on "some people should sacrifice for others" requires the same mechanism: involuntary subordination dressed as moral duty.

    There's exactly one position that doesn't collapse into contradiction when universalised.

    🔗 kairos-prometheon.com/en/blog/

    #Philosophy #Individualism #Selfownership #Sovereignty #Rand

  7. A quotation from Erich Fromm

    Most people are not even aware of their need to conform. They live under the illusion that they follow their own ideas and inclinations, that they are individualists, that they have arrived at their opinions as the result of their own thinking — and that it just happens that their ideas are the same as those of the majority. The consensus of all serves as a proof for the correctness of “their” ideas.

    Erich Fromm (1900-1980) American psychoanalyst and social philosopher
    The Art of Loving, ch. 2 (1956)

    More about this quote: wist.info/fromm-erich/80468/

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #erichfromm #choice #conformity #consensus #following #individualism #majority #orthodoxy #selfawareness #selfdeception #selfdelusion

  8. “No man is an island, / Entire of itself; / Every man is a piece of the continent, / A part of the main.”*…

    Individualism has been been a growing force in cultures around the world since the Enlightenment; it picked up momentum in the 20th century (c.f., e.g., Adam Curtis’ masterful Century of Self [and here]); and has become a– if not the— foundational concept in liberalism. But, Nils Gilman argues, the biological discovery of the holobiont gives the lie to “the autonomous individual” in a way that has massive implications not only for how we think about, but also how we govern ourselves…

    We like to believe we end at our skin. This is the primary hallucination of modern political philosophy in the West, the foundational axiom upon which we have erected our laws, our economics, and our sense of self-worth. Philosophical liberalism imagines human individuals as discrete, bounded entities — monads moving through space, contained entirely within a fleshy envelope that separates “self” from “other.” This architectural model of the human being underpins the political concept of the autonomous liberal subject, just as it grounds the social scientific commitment to methodological individualism. It asserts that the basic unit of human reality is the singular actor, the “I” that thinks, chooses, and owns.

    However, this model is a biological fiction. It is a map that corresponds to no territory found in nature. Over the last three decades the life sciences have undergone a quiet revolution that renders the classical liberal view of the subject not merely philosophical debatable, yet factually incorrect. The concept of the holobiont, coined by Adolf Meyer-Abich in 1943 but popularized in the anglophone world by Lynn Margulis in the 1990s, has shattered the idea of the unitary organism. We now know that every macro-organism is actually a dynamic ecosystem, a chimera composed of a host and billions of symbiotic microbes that function as a distinct, integrated biological unit. You are not a single entity. You are a walking coral reef, a plural assemblage of human and non-human cells negotiating a fragile, continuous existence. Roughly half the cells in your body are not human; they are bacterial, fungal, and viral. They do not merely hitch a ride. They digest your food, regulate your immune system, modulate your mood, and structure the development of your brain.

    The implications of this biological reality for political theory are cataclysmic. The entire edifice of Liberalism, from Hobbes and Locke to modern libertarianism, rests on the assumption of the “atomic individual” — a sovereign state of one. This core concept of liberal political theory posits a world of separate, self-governing agents who enter into contracts and demand rights to protect their private sphere from intrusion. The liberal subject claims (and demands) to be walled off, protected, and kept clean of the influence of others.

    Biology exposes this desire for total autonomy as not just false, but a death wish. In the logic of the holobiont, absolute immunity is not health; it is starvation. A body hermetically sealed against the “other” dies. Our physical existence requires constant contamination and collaboration with foreign agents. We cannot be “self-made” because we are constitutively “made-with.” Donna Haraway describes this shift as moving from autopoiesis (self-making) to sympoiesis (making-with). We do not precede our relationships; our relationships constitute us. If the political subject is physically constituted by “others,” the concept of self-sovereignty collapses. One cannot be the sole monarch of a kingdom occupied by foreign powers that provide the essential infrastructure for the kingdom’s survival…

    [Gilman elaborates on the implications both for our political and management systems and for the social sciences that study them. And he explores why this new perspective is hard to internalize and embrace…]

    The resistance to this holobiontic perspective is fierce because it is terrifying. As Rudyard Kipling observed (in a quote often misattributed to Nietzsche), “The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.” The autonomous liberal subject offers psychological safety. It promises control. It tells us that we are captains of our souls. Embracing the holobiont requires admitting that we are porous, vulnerable, and inextricably entangled with things we cannot control. It demands that we surrender the fantasy of the impermeable border. The skin is not a wall; it is a heavily trafficked interface. The state is not a fortress; it is a metabolic node in a planetary flow.

    We are living through the friction between our laws and our biology. We legislate for individuals, yet we live as assemblages. We worship independence while our bodies are grounded in interdependence. The future of political theory cannot simply be an adjustment of liberal categories. It requires a fundamental ontological revision that starts with relation rather than separation. We must stop trying to protect the self from the world and begin understanding the self as a spatially intensified instantiation of the world.

    Clinging to the myth of the autonomous subject is a massive act of collective denial. It represents a refusal to look at the microscope and see the legions teeming inside us. We construct our societies around a myth of being that does not correspond to biogeochemical reality. The cost of this error is everywhere apparent — in the degradation of our ecology, the polarization of our politics, and the isolation of our private lives. We try to seal ourselves off, creating sterile environments that make us sick, physically and politically. The holobiont offers a different path, one that acknowledges that to be one is always to be many. We are not solitary thinkers looking out at nature. We are nature looking at itself, through a lens made of billions of other lives. The sovereign is dead. Long live the swarm…

    The Sovereign Individual Does Not Exist,” from @nilsgilman.bsky.social.

    Further complicating the issue: “Externalities, Rights, and the Problem of Knowledge,” from Cyril Hédoin

    Very short summary: This essay explains how the knowledge problem [the challenge of a central authority having the information needed to make rational decisions for a complex system like a society] applies to the definition of jurisdictional rights. Jurisdictional rights define spheres of individual sovereignty. Rights are appropriately defined if they internalize all potential externalities. However, individuals may disagree about what counts as an externality. This disagreement stems from individuals’ preferences, which are typically dispersed and local. I discuss various solutions to this problem, including the use of polycentricity...

    [Image above: source]

    * John Donne

    ###

    As we incorporate the interconnected, we might recall that it was on this date in 1859 that our perspective was shifted in a different kind of way: Charles Darwin published The Origin of the Species.  Actually, on that day he published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life; the title was shortened to the one we know with the sixth edition in 1872.

    Title page of the 1859 edition

    source

    #charlesDarwin #culture #darwin #externalities #history #holobiont #individualism #individuality #interconnection #interdependence #philosophy #politics #reason #rights #society #theOriginOfTheSpecies

  9. “No man is an island, / Entire of itself; / Every man is a piece of the continent, / A part of the main.”*…

    Individualism has been been a growing force in cultures around the world since the Enlightenment; it picked up momentum in the 20th century (c.f., e.g., Adam Curtis’ masterful Century of Self [and here]); and has become a– if not the— foundational concept in liberalism. But, Nils Gilman argues, the biological discovery of the holobiont gives the lie to “the autonomous individual” in a way that has massive implications not only for how we think about, but also how we govern ourselves…

    We like to believe we end at our skin. This is the primary hallucination of modern political philosophy in the West, the foundational axiom upon which we have erected our laws, our economics, and our sense of self-worth. Philosophical liberalism imagines human individuals as discrete, bounded entities — monads moving through space, contained entirely within a fleshy envelope that separates “self” from “other.” This architectural model of the human being underpins the political concept of the autonomous liberal subject, just as it grounds the social scientific commitment to methodological individualism. It asserts that the basic unit of human reality is the singular actor, the “I” that thinks, chooses, and owns.

    However, this model is a biological fiction. It is a map that corresponds to no territory found in nature. Over the last three decades the life sciences have undergone a quiet revolution that renders the classical liberal view of the subject not merely philosophical debatable, yet factually incorrect. The concept of the holobiont, coined by Adolf Meyer-Abich in 1943 but popularized in the anglophone world by Lynn Margulis in the 1990s, has shattered the idea of the unitary organism. We now know that every macro-organism is actually a dynamic ecosystem, a chimera composed of a host and billions of symbiotic microbes that function as a distinct, integrated biological unit. You are not a single entity. You are a walking coral reef, a plural assemblage of human and non-human cells negotiating a fragile, continuous existence. Roughly half the cells in your body are not human; they are bacterial, fungal, and viral. They do not merely hitch a ride. They digest your food, regulate your immune system, modulate your mood, and structure the development of your brain.

    The implications of this biological reality for political theory are cataclysmic. The entire edifice of Liberalism, from Hobbes and Locke to modern libertarianism, rests on the assumption of the “atomic individual” — a sovereign state of one. This core concept of liberal political theory posits a world of separate, self-governing agents who enter into contracts and demand rights to protect their private sphere from intrusion. The liberal subject claims (and demands) to be walled off, protected, and kept clean of the influence of others.

    Biology exposes this desire for total autonomy as not just false, but a death wish. In the logic of the holobiont, absolute immunity is not health; it is starvation. A body hermetically sealed against the “other” dies. Our physical existence requires constant contamination and collaboration with foreign agents. We cannot be “self-made” because we are constitutively “made-with.” Donna Haraway describes this shift as moving from autopoiesis (self-making) to sympoiesis (making-with). We do not precede our relationships; our relationships constitute us. If the political subject is physically constituted by “others,” the concept of self-sovereignty collapses. One cannot be the sole monarch of a kingdom occupied by foreign powers that provide the essential infrastructure for the kingdom’s survival…

    [Gilman elaborates on the implications both for our political and management systems and for the social sciences that study them. And he explores why this new perspective is hard to internalize and embrace…]

    The resistance to this holobiontic perspective is fierce because it is terrifying. As Rudyard Kipling observed (in a quote often misattributed to Nietzsche), “The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.” The autonomous liberal subject offers psychological safety. It promises control. It tells us that we are captains of our souls. Embracing the holobiont requires admitting that we are porous, vulnerable, and inextricably entangled with things we cannot control. It demands that we surrender the fantasy of the impermeable border. The skin is not a wall; it is a heavily trafficked interface. The state is not a fortress; it is a metabolic node in a planetary flow.

    We are living through the friction between our laws and our biology. We legislate for individuals, yet we live as assemblages. We worship independence while our bodies are grounded in interdependence. The future of political theory cannot simply be an adjustment of liberal categories. It requires a fundamental ontological revision that starts with relation rather than separation. We must stop trying to protect the self from the world and begin understanding the self as a spatially intensified instantiation of the world.

    Clinging to the myth of the autonomous subject is a massive act of collective denial. It represents a refusal to look at the microscope and see the legions teeming inside us. We construct our societies around a myth of being that does not correspond to biogeochemical reality. The cost of this error is everywhere apparent — in the degradation of our ecology, the polarization of our politics, and the isolation of our private lives. We try to seal ourselves off, creating sterile environments that make us sick, physically and politically. The holobiont offers a different path, one that acknowledges that to be one is always to be many. We are not solitary thinkers looking out at nature. We are nature looking at itself, through a lens made of billions of other lives. The sovereign is dead. Long live the swarm…

    The Sovereign Individual Does Not Exist,” from @nilsgilman.bsky.social.

    Further complicating the issue: “Externalities, Rights, and the Problem of Knowledge,” from Cyril Hédoin

    Very short summary: This essay explains how the knowledge problem [the challenge of a central authority having the information needed to make rational decisions for a complex system like a society] applies to the definition of jurisdictional rights. Jurisdictional rights define spheres of individual sovereignty. Rights are appropriately defined if they internalize all potential externalities. However, individuals may disagree about what counts as an externality. This disagreement stems from individuals’ preferences, which are typically dispersed and local. I discuss various solutions to this problem, including the use of polycentricity...

    [Image above: source]

    * John Donne

    ###

    As we incorporate the interconnected, we might recall that it was on this date in 1859 that our perspective was shifted in a different kind of way: Charles Darwin published The Origin of the Species.  Actually, on that day he published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life; the title was shortened to the one we know with the sixth edition in 1872.

    Title page of the 1859 edition

    source

    #charlesDarwin #culture #darwin #externalities #history #holobiont #individualism #individuality #interconnection #interdependence #philosophy #politics #reason #rights #society #theOriginOfTheSpecies

  10. “No man is an island, / Entire of itself; / Every man is a piece of the continent, / A part of the main.”*…

    Individualism has been been a growing force in cultures around the world since the Enlightenment; it picked up momentum in the 20th century (c.f., e.g., Adam Curtis’ masterful Century of Self [and here]); and has become a– if not the— foundational concept in liberalism. But, Nils Gilman argues, the biological discovery of the holobiont gives the lie to “the autonomous individual” in a way that has massive implications not only for how we think about, but also how we govern ourselves…

    We like to believe we end at our skin. This is the primary hallucination of modern political philosophy in the West, the foundational axiom upon which we have erected our laws, our economics, and our sense of self-worth. Philosophical liberalism imagines human individuals as discrete, bounded entities — monads moving through space, contained entirely within a fleshy envelope that separates “self” from “other.” This architectural model of the human being underpins the political concept of the autonomous liberal subject, just as it grounds the social scientific commitment to methodological individualism. It asserts that the basic unit of human reality is the singular actor, the “I” that thinks, chooses, and owns.

    However, this model is a biological fiction. It is a map that corresponds to no territory found in nature. Over the last three decades the life sciences have undergone a quiet revolution that renders the classical liberal view of the subject not merely philosophical debatable, yet factually incorrect. The concept of the holobiont, coined by Adolf Meyer-Abich in 1943 but popularized in the anglophone world by Lynn Margulis in the 1990s, has shattered the idea of the unitary organism. We now know that every macro-organism is actually a dynamic ecosystem, a chimera composed of a host and billions of symbiotic microbes that function as a distinct, integrated biological unit. You are not a single entity. You are a walking coral reef, a plural assemblage of human and non-human cells negotiating a fragile, continuous existence. Roughly half the cells in your body are not human; they are bacterial, fungal, and viral. They do not merely hitch a ride. They digest your food, regulate your immune system, modulate your mood, and structure the development of your brain.

    The implications of this biological reality for political theory are cataclysmic. The entire edifice of Liberalism, from Hobbes and Locke to modern libertarianism, rests on the assumption of the “atomic individual” — a sovereign state of one. This core concept of liberal political theory posits a world of separate, self-governing agents who enter into contracts and demand rights to protect their private sphere from intrusion. The liberal subject claims (and demands) to be walled off, protected, and kept clean of the influence of others.

    Biology exposes this desire for total autonomy as not just false, but a death wish. In the logic of the holobiont, absolute immunity is not health; it is starvation. A body hermetically sealed against the “other” dies. Our physical existence requires constant contamination and collaboration with foreign agents. We cannot be “self-made” because we are constitutively “made-with.” Donna Haraway describes this shift as moving from autopoiesis (self-making) to sympoiesis (making-with). We do not precede our relationships; our relationships constitute us. If the political subject is physically constituted by “others,” the concept of self-sovereignty collapses. One cannot be the sole monarch of a kingdom occupied by foreign powers that provide the essential infrastructure for the kingdom’s survival…

    [Gilman elaborates on the implications both for our political and management systems and for the social sciences that study them. And he explores why this new perspective is hard to internalize and embrace…]

    The resistance to this holobiontic perspective is fierce because it is terrifying. As Rudyard Kipling observed (in a quote often misattributed to Nietzsche), “The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.” The autonomous liberal subject offers psychological safety. It promises control. It tells us that we are captains of our souls. Embracing the holobiont requires admitting that we are porous, vulnerable, and inextricably entangled with things we cannot control. It demands that we surrender the fantasy of the impermeable border. The skin is not a wall; it is a heavily trafficked interface. The state is not a fortress; it is a metabolic node in a planetary flow.

    We are living through the friction between our laws and our biology. We legislate for individuals, yet we live as assemblages. We worship independence while our bodies are grounded in interdependence. The future of political theory cannot simply be an adjustment of liberal categories. It requires a fundamental ontological revision that starts with relation rather than separation. We must stop trying to protect the self from the world and begin understanding the self as a spatially intensified instantiation of the world.

    Clinging to the myth of the autonomous subject is a massive act of collective denial. It represents a refusal to look at the microscope and see the legions teeming inside us. We construct our societies around a myth of being that does not correspond to biogeochemical reality. The cost of this error is everywhere apparent — in the degradation of our ecology, the polarization of our politics, and the isolation of our private lives. We try to seal ourselves off, creating sterile environments that make us sick, physically and politically. The holobiont offers a different path, one that acknowledges that to be one is always to be many. We are not solitary thinkers looking out at nature. We are nature looking at itself, through a lens made of billions of other lives. The sovereign is dead. Long live the swarm…

    The Sovereign Individual Does Not Exist,” from @nilsgilman.bsky.social.

    Further complicating the issue: “Externalities, Rights, and the Problem of Knowledge,” from Cyril Hédoin

    Very short summary: This essay explains how the knowledge problem [the challenge of a central authority having the information needed to make rational decisions for a complex system like a society] applies to the definition of jurisdictional rights. Jurisdictional rights define spheres of individual sovereignty. Rights are appropriately defined if they internalize all potential externalities. However, individuals may disagree about what counts as an externality. This disagreement stems from individuals’ preferences, which are typically dispersed and local. I discuss various solutions to this problem, including the use of polycentricity...

    [Image above: source]

    * John Donne

    ###

    As we incorporate the interconnected, we might recall that it was on this date in 1859 that our perspective was shifted in a different kind of way: Charles Darwin published The Origin of the Species.  Actually, on that day he published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life; the title was shortened to the one we know with the sixth edition in 1872.

    Title page of the 1859 edition

    source

    #charlesDarwin #culture #darwin #externalities #history #holobiont #individualism #individuality #interconnection #interdependence #philosophy #politics #reason #rights #society #theOriginOfTheSpecies

  11. “No man is an island, / Entire of itself; / Every man is a piece of the continent, / A part of the main.”*…

    Individualism has been been a growing force in cultures around the world since the Enlightenment; it picked up momentum in the 20th century (c.f., e.g., Adam Curtis’ masterful Century of Self [and here]); and has become a– if not the— foundational concept in liberalism. But, Nils Gilman argues, the biological discovery of the holobiont gives the lie to “the autonomous individual” in a way that has massive implications not only for how we think about, but also how we govern ourselves…

    We like to believe we end at our skin. This is the primary hallucination of modern political philosophy in the West, the foundational axiom upon which we have erected our laws, our economics, and our sense of self-worth. Philosophical liberalism imagines human individuals as discrete, bounded entities — monads moving through space, contained entirely within a fleshy envelope that separates “self” from “other.” This architectural model of the human being underpins the political concept of the autonomous liberal subject, just as it grounds the social scientific commitment to methodological individualism. It asserts that the basic unit of human reality is the singular actor, the “I” that thinks, chooses, and owns.

    However, this model is a biological fiction. It is a map that corresponds to no territory found in nature. Over the last three decades the life sciences have undergone a quiet revolution that renders the classical liberal view of the subject not merely philosophical debatable, yet factually incorrect. The concept of the holobiont, coined by Adolf Meyer-Abich in 1943 but popularized in the anglophone world by Lynn Margulis in the 1990s, has shattered the idea of the unitary organism. We now know that every macro-organism is actually a dynamic ecosystem, a chimera composed of a host and billions of symbiotic microbes that function as a distinct, integrated biological unit. You are not a single entity. You are a walking coral reef, a plural assemblage of human and non-human cells negotiating a fragile, continuous existence. Roughly half the cells in your body are not human; they are bacterial, fungal, and viral. They do not merely hitch a ride. They digest your food, regulate your immune system, modulate your mood, and structure the development of your brain.

    The implications of this biological reality for political theory are cataclysmic. The entire edifice of Liberalism, from Hobbes and Locke to modern libertarianism, rests on the assumption of the “atomic individual” — a sovereign state of one. This core concept of liberal political theory posits a world of separate, self-governing agents who enter into contracts and demand rights to protect their private sphere from intrusion. The liberal subject claims (and demands) to be walled off, protected, and kept clean of the influence of others.

    Biology exposes this desire for total autonomy as not just false, but a death wish. In the logic of the holobiont, absolute immunity is not health; it is starvation. A body hermetically sealed against the “other” dies. Our physical existence requires constant contamination and collaboration with foreign agents. We cannot be “self-made” because we are constitutively “made-with.” Donna Haraway describes this shift as moving from autopoiesis (self-making) to sympoiesis (making-with). We do not precede our relationships; our relationships constitute us. If the political subject is physically constituted by “others,” the concept of self-sovereignty collapses. One cannot be the sole monarch of a kingdom occupied by foreign powers that provide the essential infrastructure for the kingdom’s survival…

    [Gilman elaborates on the implications both for our political and management systems and for the social sciences that study them. And he explores why this new perspective is hard to internalize and embrace…]

    The resistance to this holobiontic perspective is fierce because it is terrifying. As Rudyard Kipling observed (in a quote often misattributed to Nietzsche), “The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.” The autonomous liberal subject offers psychological safety. It promises control. It tells us that we are captains of our souls. Embracing the holobiont requires admitting that we are porous, vulnerable, and inextricably entangled with things we cannot control. It demands that we surrender the fantasy of the impermeable border. The skin is not a wall; it is a heavily trafficked interface. The state is not a fortress; it is a metabolic node in a planetary flow.

    We are living through the friction between our laws and our biology. We legislate for individuals, yet we live as assemblages. We worship independence while our bodies are grounded in interdependence. The future of political theory cannot simply be an adjustment of liberal categories. It requires a fundamental ontological revision that starts with relation rather than separation. We must stop trying to protect the self from the world and begin understanding the self as a spatially intensified instantiation of the world.

    Clinging to the myth of the autonomous subject is a massive act of collective denial. It represents a refusal to look at the microscope and see the legions teeming inside us. We construct our societies around a myth of being that does not correspond to biogeochemical reality. The cost of this error is everywhere apparent — in the degradation of our ecology, the polarization of our politics, and the isolation of our private lives. We try to seal ourselves off, creating sterile environments that make us sick, physically and politically. The holobiont offers a different path, one that acknowledges that to be one is always to be many. We are not solitary thinkers looking out at nature. We are nature looking at itself, through a lens made of billions of other lives. The sovereign is dead. Long live the swarm…

    The Sovereign Individual Does Not Exist,” from @nilsgilman.bsky.social.

    Further complicating the issue: “Externalities, Rights, and the Problem of Knowledge,” from Cyril Hédoin

    Very short summary: This essay explains how the knowledge problem [the challenge of a central authority having the information needed to make rational decisions for a complex system like a society] applies to the definition of jurisdictional rights. Jurisdictional rights define spheres of individual sovereignty. Rights are appropriately defined if they internalize all potential externalities. However, individuals may disagree about what counts as an externality. This disagreement stems from individuals’ preferences, which are typically dispersed and local. I discuss various solutions to this problem, including the use of polycentricity...

    [Image above: source]

    * John Donne

    ###

    As we incorporate the interconnected, we might recall that it was on this date in 1859 that our perspective was shifted in a different kind of way: Charles Darwin published The Origin of the Species.  Actually, on that day he published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life; the title was shortened to the one we know with the sixth edition in 1872.

    Title page of the 1859 edition

    source

    #charlesDarwin #culture #darwin #externalities #history #holobiont #individualism #individuality #interconnection #interdependence #philosophy #politics #reason #rights #society #theOriginOfTheSpecies

  12. #Capitalism has ingrained in us a deep #individualism fueled on and egged on by #shame and #ablism

    How fucking DARE you need help? How fucking dare you not "pull yourself up by your bootstraps"

    It's the basic and ongoing fear mongering of the Death Machine - if you share resources you will surely die

    But why does it work? Many of us were taught to disappear to survive while on the other end of the spectrum some were taught to center themselves or die

  13. A quotation from Bertrand Russell

    Where the environment is stupid or prejudiced or cruel, it is a sign of merit to be out of harmony with it.

    Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) English mathematician and philosopher
    Conquest of Happiness, Part 1, ch. 9 “Fear of Public Opinion” (1930)

    More info about this quote: wist.info/russell-bertrand/792…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #BertrandRussell #autonomy #bullying #cruelty #discrimination #folly #foolishness #heterodoxy #independence #individualism #judgment #nastiness #nationalism #prejudice #racism #sexism #stupidity #merit #virtue

  14. A quotation from Bertrand Russell

    Where the environment is stupid or prejudiced or cruel, it is a sign of merit to be out of harmony with it.

    Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) English mathematician and philosopher
    Conquest of Happiness, Part 1, ch. 9 “Fear of Public Opinion” (1930)

    More info about this quote: wist.info/russell-bertrand/792…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #BertrandRussell #autonomy #bullying #cruelty #discrimination #folly #foolishness #heterodoxy #independence #individualism #judgment #nastiness #nationalism #prejudice #racism #sexism #stupidity #merit #virtue

  15. A quotation from Bertrand Russell

    Where the environment is stupid or prejudiced or cruel, it is a sign of merit to be out of harmony with it.

    Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) English mathematician and philosopher
    Conquest of Happiness, Part 1, ch. 9 “Fear of Public Opinion” (1930)

    More info about this quote: wist.info/russell-bertrand/792…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #BertrandRussell #autonomy #bullying #cruelty #discrimination #folly #foolishness #heterodoxy #independence #individualism #judgment #nastiness #nationalism #prejudice #racism #sexism #stupidity #merit #virtue

  16. A quotation from Bertrand Russell

    Where the environment is stupid or prejudiced or cruel, it is a sign of merit to be out of harmony with it.

    Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) English mathematician and philosopher
    Conquest of Happiness, Part 1, ch. 9 “Fear of Public Opinion” (1930)

    More info about this quote: wist.info/russell-bertrand/792…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #BertrandRussell #autonomy #bullying #cruelty #discrimination #folly #foolishness #heterodoxy #independence #individualism #judgment #nastiness #nationalism #prejudice #racism #sexism #stupidity #merit #virtue

  17. A quotation from Bertrand Russell

    Where the environment is stupid or prejudiced or cruel, it is a sign of merit to be out of harmony with it.

    Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) English mathematician and philosopher
    Conquest of Happiness, Part 1, ch. 9 “Fear of Public Opinion” (1930)

    More info about this quote: wist.info/russell-bertrand/792…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #BertrandRussell #autonomy #bullying #cruelty #discrimination #folly #foolishness #heterodoxy #independence #individualism #judgment #nastiness #nationalism #prejudice #racism #sexism #stupidity #merit #virtue

  18. "They don’t trust doctors and other medical experts when their very lives and that of their children are at stake. Many Americans would literally rather die than to trust.

    They have been led down this path by a man who feeds their paranoia because it’s all he knows. It’s no wonder to me that Donald Trump is pursuing both a political and economic agenda of distrust."

    #Americans #solidarity #trust #CommonGood #individualism #SocialFragmentation #Trump
    /3

  19. "A large percentage of Americans don’t trust institutions unless their people control them, they don’t trust experts or the media or even basic facts unless they tell them what they already believe, and they don’t trust the Constitution unless it privileges them. They don’t trust people who are different from them, but they don’t even trust their family members if they aren’t part of their political tribe."

    #Americans #solidarity #trust #CommonGood #individualism #SocialFragmentation #MAGA
    /2

  20. "America itself is rapidly unraveling as functioning society. We’ve lost an awful lot in the last 10 years (and the trends lines no doubt began long before the rise of Trump), but mostly what we’ve lost is trust."

    ~ Holly Berkley Fletcher

    #Americans #solidarity #trust #CommonGood #individualism #SocialFragmentation
    /1

    hollyberkleyfletcher.substack.

  21. Retro Personality Eccentric Antique Shop Design

    Enter the world of eccentric individuality as you step into this one-of-a-kind antique shop design inspired by author Daniel Bel's avant-garde characters Get ready to immerse yourself in a mash-up of retro...

    See More Seeds: aidyslexic.raupulus.dev/collec

    #StableDiffusion #ai #ArtificialIntelligence #retro #personality #eccentric #antique-shop #character-design #Daniel-Bel #vintage #collectibles #unique #individualism

  22. ▀▀▀

    #Anarchy #AntiCiv #AntiCom #AntiLeft #AntiWork #Attack #EcoExtremism #Egoism #Illegalism #Individualism #Insurrection #Maraud #Nihilism #Riot #Sabotage

    by the way: fvck identity politics! and fvck political correctness! fvck leftism and fvck marxism! — only because of missing Ⓐlternatives of the/a respective topic i also sometimes share red/leftist links — yes, shit, sorry

    gender: unicornpiglet • pronouns: fvckyouall • posts in: de/en • potsdam/berlin

    #AnarchistNarcoticsAnonymous

    ▀▀▀

    Anarchist News
    anarchistnews.org
    chronik — widerständige momente festgehalten
    chronik.blackblogs.org
    The anarchist project: Act for freedom now!
    actforfree.noblogs.org
    In the Dark Nights there is always the warmth of the fire!
    darknights.noblogs.org
    Attaque — Chronique de la guerre sociale en France
    attaque.noblogs.org
    ABOLITION MEDIA
    abolitionmedia.noblogs.org
    NOBLOGS Activity
    noblogs.org/activity
    The Anarchist Library
    theanarchistlibrary.org/specia
    Latest entries | The Anarchist Library (Mirror)
    usa.anarchistlibraries.net/lat
    Anarchistische Bibliothek
    anarchistischebibliothek.org/s
    Why Elephant Editions? | Elephant Archives
    archive.elephanteditions.net/s
    Archive dot org
    archive.org
    Zündlappen — Anarchistische Zeitung aus dem Nirgendwo
    zuendlappen.noblogs.org
    Sans Nom
    sansnom.noblogs.org
    Inferno Urbano
    infernourbano.altervista.org
    Lutter contre le 41 bis
    luttercontrele41bis.noblogs.or

    ▀▀▀

    stopfossilfuels.org

    theanarchistlibrary.org/librar

    usa.anarchistlibraries.net/lib

    theanarchistlibrary.org/catego

  23. ▀▀▀

    #Anarchy #AntiCiv #AntiCom #AntiLeft #AntiWork #Attack #EcoExtremism #Egoism #Illegalism #Individualism #Insurrection #Maraud #Nihilism #Riot #Sabotage

    by the way: fvck identity politics! and fvck political correctness! fvck leftism and fvck marxism! — only because of missing Ⓐlternatives of the/a respective topic i also sometimes share red/leftist links — yes, shit, sorry

    gender: unicornpiglet • pronouns: fvckyouall • posts in: de/en • potsdam/berlin

    #AnarchistNarcoticsAnonymous

    ▀▀▀

    Anarchist News
    anarchistnews.org
    chronik — widerständige momente festgehalten
    chronik.blackblogs.org
    The anarchist project: Act for freedom now!
    actforfree.noblogs.org
    In the Dark Nights there is always the warmth of the fire!
    darknights.noblogs.org
    Attaque — Chronique de la guerre sociale en France
    attaque.noblogs.org
    ABOLITION MEDIA
    abolitionmedia.noblogs.org
    NOBLOGS Activity
    noblogs.org/activity
    The Anarchist Library
    theanarchistlibrary.org/specia
    Latest entries | The Anarchist Library (Mirror)
    usa.anarchistlibraries.net/lat
    Anarchistische Bibliothek
    anarchistischebibliothek.org/s
    Why Elephant Editions? | Elephant Archives
    archive.elephanteditions.net/s
    Archive dot org
    archive.org
    Zündlappen — Anarchistische Zeitung aus dem Nirgendwo
    zuendlappen.noblogs.org
    Sans Nom
    sansnom.noblogs.org
    Inferno Urbano
    infernourbano.altervista.org
    Lutter contre le 41 bis
    luttercontrele41bis.noblogs.or

    ▀▀▀

    stopfossilfuels.org

    theanarchistlibrary.org/librar

    usa.anarchistlibraries.net/lib

    theanarchistlibrary.org/catego

  24. stopfossilfuels.org

    theanarchistlibrary.org/librar

    usa.anarchistlibraries.net/lib

    theanarchistlibrary.org/catego

    ▀▀▀

    #Anarchy #AntiCiv #AntiCom #AntiLeft #AntiWork #Attack #EcoExtremism #Egoism #Illegalism #Individualism #Insurrection #Maraud #Nihilism #Riot #Sabotage

    by the way: fvck identity politics! and fvck political correctness! fvck leftism and fvck marxism! — only because of missing Ⓐlternatives of the/a respective topic i also sometimes share red/leftist links — yes, shit, sorry

    gender: unicornpiglet • pronouns: fvckyouall • posts in: de/en • potsdam/berlin

    #AnarchistNarcoticsAnonymous

    ▀▀▀

    Anarchist News
    anarchistnews.org
    chronik — widerständige momente festgehalten
    chronik.blackblogs.org
    The anarchist project: Act for freedom now!
    actforfree.noblogs.org
    In the Dark Nights there is always the warmth of the fire!
    darknights.noblogs.org
    Attaque — Chronique de la guerre sociale en France
    attaque.noblogs.org
    ABOLITION MEDIA
    abolitionmedia.noblogs.org
    NOBLOGS Activity
    noblogs.org/activity
    The Anarchist Library
    theanarchistlibrary.org/specia
    Latest entries | The Anarchist Library (Mirror)
    usa.anarchistlibraries.net/lat
    Anarchistische Bibliothek
    anarchistischebibliothek.org/s
    Why Elephant Editions? | Elephant Archives
    archive.elephanteditions.net/s
    Archive dot org
    archive.org
    Zündlappen — Anarchistische Zeitung aus dem Nirgendwo
    zuendlappen.noblogs.org
    Sans Nom
    sansnom.noblogs.org
    Inferno Urbano
    infernourbano.altervista.org
    Lutter contre le 41 bis
    luttercontrele41bis.noblogs.or

    ▀▀▀

  25. ▀▀▀

    #Anarchy #AntiCiv #AntiCom #AntiLeft #AntiWork #Attack #EcoExtremism #Egoism #Illegalism #Individualism #Insurrection #Maraud #Nihilism #Riot #Sabotage

    by the way: fvck identity politics! and fvck political correctness! fvck leftism and fvck marxism! — only because of missing Ⓐlternatives of the/a respective topic i also sometimes share red/leftist links — yes, shit, sorry

    gender: unicornpiglet • pronouns: fvckyouall • posts in: de/en • potsdam/berlin

    #AnarchistNarcoticsAnonymous

    ▀▀▀

    Anarchist News
    anarchistnews.org
    chronik — widerständige momente festgehalten
    chronik.blackblogs.org
    The anarchist project: Act for freedom now!
    actforfree.noblogs.org
    In the Dark Nights there is always the warmth of the fire!
    darknights.noblogs.org
    Attaque — Chronique de la guerre sociale en France
    attaque.noblogs.org
    ABOLITION MEDIA
    abolitionmedia.noblogs.org
    NOBLOGS Activity
    noblogs.org/activity
    The Anarchist Library
    theanarchistlibrary.org/specia
    Latest entries | The Anarchist Library (Mirror)
    usa.anarchistlibraries.net/lat
    Anarchistische Bibliothek
    anarchistischebibliothek.org/s
    Why Elephant Editions? | Elephant Archives
    archive.elephanteditions.net/s
    Archive dot org
    archive.org
    Zündlappen — Anarchistische Zeitung aus dem Nirgendwo
    zuendlappen.noblogs.org
    Sans Nom
    sansnom.noblogs.org
    Inferno Urbano
    infernourbano.altervista.org
    Lutter contre le 41 bis
    luttercontrele41bis.noblogs.or

    ▀▀▀

    stopfossilfuels.org

    theanarchistlibrary.org/librar

    usa.anarchistlibraries.net/lib

    theanarchistlibrary.org/catego

  26. stopfossilfuels.org

    theanarchistlibrary.org/librar

    usa.anarchistlibraries.net/lib

    theanarchistlibrary.org/catego

    ▀▀▀

    #Anarchy #AntiCiv #AntiCom #AntiLeft #AntiWork #Attack #EcoExtremism #Egoism #Illegalism #Individualism #Insurrection #Maraud #Nihilism #Riot #Sabotage

    by the way: fvck identity politics! and fvck political correctness! fvck leftism and fvck marxism! — only because of missing Ⓐlternatives of the/a respective topic i also sometimes share red/leftist links — yes, shit, sorry

    gender: unicornpiglet • pronouns: fvckyouall • posts in: de/en • potsdam/berlin

    #AnarchistNarcoticsAnonymous

    ▀▀▀

    Anarchist News
    anarchistnews.org
    chronik — widerständige momente festgehalten
    chronik.blackblogs.org
    The anarchist project: Act for freedom now!
    actforfree.noblogs.org
    In the Dark Nights there is always the warmth of the fire!
    darknights.noblogs.org
    Attaque — Chronique de la guerre sociale en France
    attaque.noblogs.org
    ABOLITION MEDIA
    abolitionmedia.noblogs.org
    NOBLOGS Activity
    noblogs.org/activity
    The Anarchist Library
    theanarchistlibrary.org/specia
    Latest entries | The Anarchist Library (Mirror)
    usa.anarchistlibraries.net/lat
    Anarchistische Bibliothek
    anarchistischebibliothek.org/s
    Why Elephant Editions? | Elephant Archives
    archive.elephanteditions.net/s
    Archive dot org
    archive.org
    Zündlappen — Anarchistische Zeitung aus dem Nirgendwo
    zuendlappen.noblogs.org
    Sans Nom
    sansnom.noblogs.org
    Inferno Urbano
    infernourbano.altervista.org
    Lutter contre le 41 bis
    luttercontrele41bis.noblogs.or

    ▀▀▀