home.social

#justices — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #justices, aggregated by home.social.

  1. “Last week, in an extremely rare public statement, the chief #justices of Alberta’s top courts insisted that a ‘properly functioning democracy’ requires its executive, legislative & judicial branches of government to operate separately” (Jan 27 story) #Alberta www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/alber...

    Alberta justices emphasize ind...

  2. When #justices of the SCOTUS won’t read regular news sources, as if their partiality might get tainted by what is actually happen in the world, this is what results:

    hachyderm.io/@inthehands/11581

  3. @verdantsquare

    this article gives too much credit to piece of shit Roberts & the other #cancervative corrupt #justices, as though their decision was in good faith, rather than the will of their owners

    these are member of the #GDD bought & paid for by the #ACO

    giving absolute power to anyone is stupid. giving it to a brainless psychopath is straight up nefarious intent

    the 6 venal perjurers of #SCOTUS should all be removed from the bench if #democracy & #justice are ever restored to the US

  4. Face à la proposition de rétablir le délit de séjour irrégulier, la #LDH rappelle que ce n’est pas d’une énième loi sur l’immigration et contre les étrangèr-e-s dont ont besoin les citoyen-ne-s de notre pays, c’est de #progrès social, de mesures de #justices sociales et fiscales qui permettent de vivre dignement de son travail ou de sa retraite.
    ldh-france.org/proposition-de-

  5. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Describes Her Fight Against Injustice | Princeton Alumni Weekly

    Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, left, discussed her memoir with Professor Deborah Pearlstein at Richardson Auditorium.

    On the Campus

    Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Describes Her Fight Against Injustice

    In a talk on campus, Jackson discussed her new memoir and highlighted lessons from her mother.

    Sameer A. Khan h’21 / SPIA / Princeton University

    By Lia Opperman ’25, Published Sept. 29, 2025, 3 min read

    Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, speaking on campus Sept. 10, said that her parents — who grew up in the segregated South — gave her the confidence to fight injustice and navigate the challenges she has faced in her career.

    “Part of my mother’s lesson was, you’re going to see the injustices, you may even face them, but you have to understand that focusing on them will end up, at times, taking you away from the work, which is really the most important thing,” she told Deborah Pearlstein, director of the Princeton Program in Law and Public Policy. She explained how her mother helped her learn to choose her battles.

    Jackson spoke about her new memoir Lovely One, which describes her path to becoming the first Black woman to serve on the nation’s highest court.

    One injustice she discussed in her talk happened during her sophomore year at Harvard, when someone in the main area of the quad where she lived put up a Confederate flag. “You have to remember that the very serious function of racism is distraction, that it keeps you from doing your work,” Jackson recalled her mother saying. She remembered repeating this at a Black Students Association meeting, which she said was helpful for the group to continue its advocacy despite the circumstances.

    Later, as an assistant special counsel to the United States Sentencing Commission, she fought to bridge disparities between sentences for drug offenses related to crack and powder cocaine, despite knowing it could jeopardize her chances of becoming appointed as a judge. After Congress changed the mandatory minimum, she worked to have sentences revised for people who had been convicted under the previous guidelines, who were predominately Black. While the commission was bipartisan, she worried about being too forceful with her approach. She delivered a passionate speech on the topic, which she said may have contributed to her appointment as a U.S. district judge in 2012.

    Jackson said among her most prized possessions is a copy of a petition filed to the Supreme Court by Clarence Gideon, a poor man who was charged with breaking and entering but was denied court-appointed counsel. He was convicted, but on appeal in 1963, the Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling that any criminal defendant who can’t afford a lawyer be provided one. Jackson said as a former public defender, she understood the significance of his case.

    When asked about the Supreme Court’s emergency docket, used to address applications that seek immediate action, and the Trump administration’s frequent use of that process, Jackson said, “I think it’s hard to look at the emergency docket and glean anything right now … about the nature of the court.”

    Continue/Read Original Article Here: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Describes Her Fight Against Injustice | Princeton Alumni Weekly

    #Fight #Injustice #JusticeKetanjiBrownJackson #Justices #PrincetonAlumniWeekly #PrincetonUniversity #ProfessorDeborahPearlstein #RichardsonAuditorium #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStates #USSupremeCourt

  6. 'All 9 #SCOTUS #Justices against #Trump / #MAGA #censorship'

    a nice 'act'' (at least from 6 judges) to make a good 'impression'
    but it's just a 'show'
    trump and his 'administration' already control all the #television and #printed #information channels
    'We the People' recive ONLY #State #Propaganda
    The only free sane information in #US today is on the #Web
    If
    you can recognise / avoid state 'Bot' & propagandists (thousands)
    mostly on X & Facebook
    so
    basically
    all "Alternative facts"

  7. Amy Coney Barrett: A Deep Dive into the Supreme Court’s Conservative Pivot – A Special SCOTUS Series

    By Joe Ravi, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link, article series…

    Editor’s Note: Recently, I’ve considered a look at SCOTUS more in depth. It’s moving the law in right wing and conservative directions, and changing by fiat the power of the President, diminishing the power of Congress. This is the first article to examine the justices. The last in the series will talk about changes that should and need to be made to our top court.
    –DrWeb

    Amy Coney Barrett: A Deep Dive into the Supreme Court’s Conservative Pivot

    Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett has indeed emerged as a pivotal figure on the nation’s highest court since her controversial confirmation in October 2020. Her visibility and influence have grown significantly, particularly following her role in landmark decisions affecting abortion rights and other contentious social issues.

    Background and Rise to the Court

    Antonin Scalia, By Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States – Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States, Public Domain.

    Amy Vivian Coney Barrett, born January 28, 1972, graduated first in her class from Notre Dame Law School in 1997. She clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia, whose judicial philosophy of textualism and originalism she has embraced. After serving as a Notre Dame law professor and later as a federal appeals judge on the Seventh Circuit from 2017-2020, Trump nominated her to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat just 38 days before the 2020 election.

    Her confirmation was historically contentious – she became the first Supreme Court justice in 150 years confirmed without any support from the minority party, passing by a 52-48 vote with all Democrats opposing. This partisan divide foreshadowed the significant role she would play in reshaping American jurisprudence.

    Understanding Barrett’s Judicial Philosophy:
    Key Terms Explained

    Textualism

    Textualism is a method of legal interpretation that focuses exclusively on the plain meaning of statutory and constitutional text as it would have been understood by ordinary readers at the time of enactment. Textualists like Barrett reject consideration of legislative intent, policy outcomes, or evolving social context, instead asking what a “reasonable person” would understand the words to mean in their historical context. As Justice Scalia, Barrett’s mentor, famously illustrated: when a law prohibits “using a firearm” in drug crimes, a textualist would interpret this as using the gun as a weapon, not trading it as barter—because that’s what guns are “normally used for.” While textualism promises objectivity and simplicity by focusing solely on text, critics argue it can oversimplify complex legal issues and ignore how language evolves over time.

    Originalism

    Originalism is the constitutional interpretation theory holding that the Constitution should be understood according to its “original public meaning”—what the text meant to ordinary readers when it was ratified, not what modern interpreters think it should mean today. Unlike “living constitution” approaches that allow constitutional meaning to evolve with changing times, originalists like Barrett believe constitutional text has a fixed meaning that can only be changed through the formal amendment process, not judicial reinterpretation. This philosophy often leads to conservative outcomes because it anchors legal interpretation in 18th and 19th-century understandings of rights and government power. Barrett has explicitly embraced this approach, arguing that “constitutional text means what it did at the time it was ratified and that this original public meaning is authoritative.” Together, textualism and originalism form the intellectual foundation for Barrett’s approach to cases involving abortion, same-sex marriage, and other contemporary constitutional questions.

    Key Rulings and Voting Record

    Abortion Rights: The Dobbs Decision

    Barrett was indeed central to overturning Roe v. Wade in the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision. In her forthcoming book “Listening to the Law,” she defends this vote, arguing that Roe “bypassed the preferences of the American populace” and that abortion rights were never “deeply entrenched in American history.” She maintains that the court’s role is “to respect choices that people have agreed to, not tell them what they should agree to.”

    Same-Sex Marriage: The Next Target?

    Via Wikipedia…

    Barrett’s potential role in reversing same-sex marriage appears well-founded given her judicial record and stated philosophy. Barrett has connections to religious organizations with anti-LGBTQ+ positions and previously endorsed a 2015 letter affirming traditional marriage as “rooted in the unwavering commitment of a man and a woman.” During her confirmation hearings, she controversially referred to LGBTQ+ individuals as having “sexual preference,” later apologizing.

    Several Republican-led state legislatures are currently pushing resolutions urging the Supreme Court to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage. In her new book, Barrett distinguishes abortion from other rights like marriage, suggesting the “complicated moral debate” around abortion differentiates it from rights that enjoy broader public support.

    Barrett’s Growing Independence and Influence

    Despite her conservative credentials, Barrett has demonstrated surprising independence from the court’s conservative bloc in some cases. Legal observers note she’s “striking Sandra Day O’Connor’s path” by being “independent of her conservative brethren on some important questions.” This has made her a justice to watch, as Chief Justice Roberts may increasingly need to negotiate with her for crucial fifth votes.

    Her voting statistics reflect her conservative alignment but also show strategic positioning: in the 2023-2024 term, she was in the majority 92% of the time, and averaged 91% majority alignment since joining the court.

    Her New Book: “Listening to the Law”

    Barrett’s memoir “Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution” was released on September 9, 2025. The book provides unprecedented insight into Supreme Court operations and her judicial philosophy. Beyond defending the Dobbs decision, she reveals personal struggles with cases she found “distasteful to cast,” particularly regarding capital punishment.

    Barrett’s Writings and Academic Work

    Barrett’s notable works include:

    • “Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution” (September 2025) – her memoir
    • Numerous law review articles during her Notre Dame professorship (2002-2017)
    • Federal court opinions from her Seventh Circuit tenure (2017-2020)
    • Supreme Court opinions since 2020

    Research Note: For comprehensive access to her academic writings, researchers should check Notre Dame Law School’s faculty repository, legal databases like Westlaw or LexisNexis, and Google Scholar for open-access pieces.

    The Broader Implications

    Barrett’s position as the court’s potential swing vote on social issues makes her arguably the most consequential justice for the future of American civil rights. At 53, she could serve for decades, shaping law long after current political dynamics change. Her approach of distinguishing between different types of rights based on historical grounding and public acceptance suggests a methodical strategy for rolling back progressive precedents.

    Barrett appears “key” to potential rulings on same-sex marriage, given both her stated judicial philosophy and the current legal landscape where conservative activists are actively challenging Obergefell. Her role in the conservative majority’s systematic dismantling of liberal precedents positions her as one of the most watched and influential justices in modern Supreme Court history.

    Sources

    1. Wikipedia Contributors. “Amy Coney Barrett.” Wikipedia, May 7, 2017. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett
    2. CNN. “Exclusive: Justice Amy Coney Barrett defends overturning Roe v. Wade and reveals Supreme Court dynamics in new book.” CNN Politics, September 2, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/02/politics/amy-coney-barrett-book-supreme-court-abortion
    3. National Women’s History Museum. “Amy Coney Barrett.” Women’s History Museum, August 31, 2021. https://www.womenshistory.org/education-resources/biographies/amy-coney-barrett
    4. Ballotpedia. “Amy Coney Barrett.” Ballotpedia, September 28, 2020. https://ballotpedia.org/Amy_Coney_Barrett
    5. Reuters. “US Supreme Court’s Barrett defends overturning abortion right in new book.” Reuters Legal, September 2, 2025. https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-courts-barrett-defends-overturning-abortion-right-new-book-2025-09-02/
    6. Newsweek. “What Amy Coney Barrett Has Said on Gay Marriage as Republicans Push to End Same-Sex Marriage.” Newsweek, March 14, 2025. https://www.newsweek.com/what-amy-coney-barrett-has-said-gay-marriage-republicans-push-end-2044855
    7. Alliance for Justice. “USA Today: How Amy Coney Barrett emerged as the Supreme Court Justice to Watch.” Alliance for Justice, July 10, 2024. https://afj.org/article/usa-today-how-amy-coney-barrett-emerged-as-the-supreme-court-justice-to-watch/
    8. Reagan Foundation. “A Conversation and Book Signing with Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett.” Reagan Foundation Events, August 31, 2025. https://www.reaganfoundation.org/events/a-conversation-and-book-signing-with-amy-coney-barrett
    9. Justia. “Justice Amy Coney Barrett.” Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center, October 26, 2020. https://supreme.justia.com/justices/amy-coney-barrett/
    10. Newsweek. “Amy Coney Barrett Reveals Her ‘Distasteful’ Supreme Court Vote.” Newsweek, September 3, 2025. https://www.newsweek.com/amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court-distasteful-vote-2124025
    11. New York Court Watcher. “Splinters in the 6-3 Supreme Court (Part 1: Amy Coney Barrett).” New York Court Watcher, December 30, 2024. http://www.newyorkcourtwatcher.com/2024/12/splinters-in-6-3-supreme-court-part-1.html
    12. Newsweek. “Amy Coney Barrett Says ‘Rights to Marry’ Are Different From Abortion.” Newsweek, September 2, 2025. https://www.newsweek.com/amy-coney-barrett-abortion-supreme-court-decision-2123359
    13. Library of Congress. “Justice Amy Coney Barrett.” 2025 National Book Festival, July 7, 2025. https://www.loc.gov/events/2025-national-book-festival/authors/item/no2020054095/justice-amy-coney-barrett/
    14. Empirical SCOTUS. “The Real A.C.B.” Empirical SCOTUS, March 31, 2025. https://empiricalscotus.com/2025/04/01/the-real-a-c-b/
    15. Barnes & Noble. “Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution by Amy Coney Barrett.” Barnes & Noble, August 31, 2025. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/listening-to-the-law-amy-coney-barrett/1147168709
    16. Cornell Law School. “Textualism.” Wex Legal Information Institute, July 24, 2016. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/textualism
    17. Wikipedia Contributors. “Textualism.” Wikipedia, November 9, 2005. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textualism
    18. Pacific Legal Foundation. “Originalism vs. Textualism.” Pacific Legal Foundation, December 13, 2023. https://pacificlegal.org/originalism-vs-textualism-vs-living-constitutionalism/
    19. EBSCO Research Starters. “Textualism.” EBSCO Research Starters – Law, October 31, 2020. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/law/textualism

    Article researched and compiled September 6, 2025

    #2025 #AbortionRights #AI #America #AmyConeyBarrett #AntoninScalia #artificialIntelligence #DonaldTrump #Education #Health #History #Justices #Libraries #Library #LibraryOfCongress #Marriage #Opinion #Perplexity #Politics #Reading #Resistance #SameSexMarriage #Science #SCOTUS #Trump #TrumpAdministration #USSupremeCourt #UnitedStates

  8. #Total #Immunity Chief Justice John Roberts described the #ruleoflaw as #endangered and warned against “trashing the #justices." “The notion that rule of law governs is the basic proposition,” Roberts said during appearance at Georgetown Law. “Certainly as a matter of theory, but also as a matter of practice, we need to stop and reflect every now and then how rare that is, certainly rare throughout history, and rare in the world today.” #OpusDei has regrets, nah. #trump politico.com/news/2025/05/12/c

  9. “To a very sad degree, #SupremeCourt #justices and members of #Congress are already complicit in this experiment in #stateterror. They might find their way back to an #America in which their offices have meaning, but only with the help of we the people” open.substack.com/pub/snyder/p...

    State Terror

  10. #politics #scotus #amyconeybarrett #justices
    Aaron Rupar
    "The Court has lurched so far rightward that Barrett’s views are sometimes moderate in comparison, but that doesn’t mean she’s liberal or will consistently work to stop Trump’s worst excesses. It likely does mean, though, that she represents the best possibility for liberal outcomes at the Court."
    publicnotice.co/p/amy-coney-ba

  11. In a rare show of unity, all nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court appear likely to side with a heterosexual woman in a case of "reverse discrimination." “We’re in radical agreement today” Justice Neil Gorsuch said. Read more from @USAToday

    flip.it/_4VYLf

    #SCOTUS #Justices #SupremeCourt #Discrimination #Rights #LGBTQIA

  12. 2041. After four more election cycles, that's the first year I see anyone outside of the GOP living in the White House. bc "If we win it's fair but if you win it's rigged" plus all the tricks listed in this article.
    #modify or #repeal #22nd_Amendment #run as #VicePresident #make #Ivanka run #GOP #WhiteHouse #fake #elections #America's #Putin #elected a #dictator #SCOTUS #king #above the #law #SupremeCourt #captured #packed #rigged #bought #justices #legislating #bench cnbc.com/2025/01/23/trump-thir

  13. 2041. After four more election cycles, that's the first year I see anyone outside of the GOP living in the White House. bc "If we win it's fair but if you win it's rigged" plus all the tricks listed in this article.
    #modify or #repeal #22nd_Amendment #run as #VicePresident #make #Ivanka run #GOP #WhiteHouse #fake #elections #America's #Putin #elected a #dictator #SCOTUS #king #above the #law #SupremeCourt #captured #packed #rigged #bought #justices #legislating #bench cnbc.com/2025/01/23/trump-thir

  14. 2041. After four more election cycles, that's the first year I see anyone outside of the GOP living in the White House. bc "If we win it's fair but if you win it's rigged" plus all the tricks listed in this article.
    #modify or #repeal #22nd_Amendment #run as #VicePresident #make #Ivanka run #GOP #WhiteHouse #fake #elections #America's #Putin #elected a #dictator #SCOTUS #king #above the #law #SupremeCourt #captured #packed #rigged #bought #justices #legislating #bench cnbc.com/2025/01/23/trump-thir

  15. 2041. After four more election cycles, that's the first year I see anyone outside of the GOP living in the White House. bc "If we win it's fair but if you win it's rigged" plus all the tricks listed in this article.
    #modify or #repeal #22nd_Amendment #run as #VicePresident #make #Ivanka run #GOP #WhiteHouse #fake #elections #America's #Putin #elected a #dictator #SCOTUS #king #above the #law #SupremeCourt #captured #packed #rigged #bought #justices #legislating #bench cnbc.com/2025/01/23/trump-thir

  16. 2041. After four more election cycles, that's the first year I see anyone outside of the GOP living in the White House. bc "If we win it's fair but if you win it's rigged" plus all the tricks listed in this article.
    #modify or #repeal #22nd_Amendment #run as #VicePresident #make #Ivanka run #GOP #WhiteHouse #fake #elections #America's #Putin #elected a #dictator #SCOTUS #king #above the #law #SupremeCourt #captured #packed #rigged #bought #justices #legislating #bench cnbc.com/2025/01/23/trump-thir

  17. Court grants challenge to #FCC subsidies over nondelegation doctrine

    The #justices on Friday created the prospect of another major ruling on the role of #administrative agencies and #Congress’s ability to delegate #power to those agencies.

    amylhowe.com/2024/11/22/court-

  18. @absinthe :100a:

    Spot.

    As I have reiterated to them in the past, THEY are to blame for Roe being overturned, They are responsible for the six right-wing #JUSTICES and they are to blame for dooming Hillary's presidential chances by voting Jill Stein and Trump in 2016.

  19. #SCOTUS #justices #federal #judges on #lowercourts dont have 2 #publicly #disclose when they dine, stay @ someone's personal residence even 1 owned by business entity under revised #ethics #rule. Amended policy by US Judicial Conference's Comte on Financial Disclosure which sets rules followed by 9 justices. Critics said move #diluted ethics requirements. Cmte has been reviewing #allegations that #Thomas improperly failed 2 report gifts +luxury travel from #HarlanCrow reuters.com/world/us/us-suprem