home.social

#separationofpowers — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #separationofpowers, aggregated by home.social.

  1. #GiftArticle

    The deal #Trump reached with his subordinates relies on a mechanism created by #Congress that legal experts warned was subject to manipulation.

    …The whole enterprise is a jarring shock to conventional understanding of the #constitution, raising…profound questions of #PresidentialPower. If allowed to stand, Trump will have managed simultaneously to thwart Congress’s #PowerOfThePurse & the ability of the #courts to police the #SeparationOfPowers.

    #law
    nytimes.com/2026/05/20/us/poli

  2. #GiftArticle

    The deal #Trump reached with his subordinates relies on a mechanism created by #Congress that legal experts warned was subject to manipulation.

    …The whole enterprise is a jarring shock to conventional understanding of the #constitution, raising…profound questions of #PresidentialPower. If allowed to stand, Trump will have managed simultaneously to thwart Congress’s #PowerOfThePurse & the ability of the #courts to police the #SeparationOfPowers.

    #law
    nytimes.com/2026/05/20/us/poli

  3. #GiftArticle

    The deal #Trump reached with his subordinates relies on a mechanism created by #Congress that legal experts warned was subject to manipulation.

    …The whole enterprise is a jarring shock to conventional understanding of the #constitution, raising…profound questions of #PresidentialPower. If allowed to stand, Trump will have managed simultaneously to thwart Congress’s #PowerOfThePurse & the ability of the #courts to police the #SeparationOfPowers.

    #law
    nytimes.com/2026/05/20/us/poli

  4. #GiftArticle

    The deal #Trump reached with his subordinates relies on a mechanism created by #Congress that legal experts warned was subject to manipulation.

    …The whole enterprise is a jarring shock to conventional understanding of the #constitution, raising…profound questions of #PresidentialPower. If allowed to stand, Trump will have managed simultaneously to thwart Congress’s #PowerOfThePurse & the ability of the #courts to police the #SeparationOfPowers.

    #law
    nytimes.com/2026/05/20/us/poli

  5. #GiftArticle

    The deal #Trump reached with his subordinates relies on a mechanism created by #Congress that legal experts warned was subject to manipulation.

    …The whole enterprise is a jarring shock to conventional understanding of the #constitution, raising…profound questions of #PresidentialPower. If allowed to stand, Trump will have managed simultaneously to thwart Congress’s #PowerOfThePurse & the ability of the #courts to police the #SeparationOfPowers.

    #law
    nytimes.com/2026/05/20/us/poli

  6. ⚖️ America was founded as a constitutional republic, not a monarchy, theocracy, or personality cult.

    This opinion piece examines how MAGA-style authoritarianism, blind loyalty, attacks on democratic institutions, and disregard for separation of powers threaten the very framework that keeps government accountable to the people.

    Read more:
    https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/u-s-politics/trumpism-and-constitutional-collapse



    #Trumpism #Constitution #Democracy #SeparationOfPowers #MAGA #USPolitics #Trump
  7. ⚖️ America was founded as a constitutional republic, not a monarchy, theocracy, or personality cult.

    This opinion piece examines how MAGA-style authoritarianism, blind loyalty, attacks on democratic institutions, and disregard for separation of powers threaten the very framework that keeps government accountable to the people.

    Read more:
    https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/u-s-politics/trumpism-and-constitutional-collapse



    #Trumpism #Constitution #Democracy #SeparationOfPowers #MAGA #USPolitics #Trump
  8. ⚖️ America was founded as a constitutional republic, not a monarchy, theocracy, or personality cult.

    This opinion piece examines how MAGA-style authoritarianism, blind loyalty, attacks on democratic institutions, and disregard for separation of powers threaten the very framework that keeps government accountable to the people.

    Read more:
    https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/u-s-politics/trumpism-and-constitutional-collapse



    #Trumpism #Constitution #Democracy #SeparationOfPowers #MAGA #USPolitics #Trump
  9. ⚖️ America was founded as a constitutional republic, not a monarchy, theocracy, or personality cult.

    This opinion piece examines how MAGA-style authoritarianism, blind loyalty, attacks on democratic institutions, and disregard for separation of powers threaten the very framework that keeps government accountable to the people.

    Read more:
    https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/u-s-politics/trumpism-and-constitutional-collapse



    #Trumpism #Constitution #Democracy #SeparationOfPowers #MAGA #USPolitics #Trump
  10. ⚖️ America was founded as a constitutional republic, not a monarchy, theocracy, or personality cult.

    This opinion piece examines how MAGA-style authoritarianism, blind loyalty, attacks on democratic institutions, and disregard for separation of powers threaten the very framework that keeps government accountable to the people.

    Read more:
    https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/u-s-politics/trumpism-and-constitutional-collapse



    #Trumpism #Constitution #Democracy #SeparationOfPowers #MAGA #USPolitics #Trump
  11. Trumpism and Constitutional Collapse: How America Might Be Stronger If MAGA Had Never Reached Power

    Trumpism and Constitutional Collapse examines MAGA authoritarianism, constitutional overreach, separation of powers, religious freedom, and why America’s republic depends on leaders serving the Constitution rather than one man.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  12. Trumpism and Constitutional Collapse: How America Might Be Stronger If MAGA Had Never Reached Power

    Trumpism and Constitutional Collapse examines MAGA authoritarianism, constitutional overreach, separation of powers, religious freedom, and why America’s republic depends on leaders serving the Constitution rather than one man.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  13. Virginia Redistricting Ruling sparks dangerous clash between voter will and judicial power

    Virginia Redistricting Ruling nullified a voter-approved amendment, preserving old maps and escalating a constitutional fight over voter sovereignty and judicial power.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  14. The move frees a trial judge to act on the #Trump admin’s pending request to dismiss Bannon’s conviction & indictment “in the interests of justice” [rewriting history].

    The dismissal would be largely symbolic. #SteveBannon served a 4-month prison term after a #jury #convicted him of #contempt of #Congress in 2022. A federal appeals court in Washington upheld the conviction.

    #SCOTUS #law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower

  15. The move frees a trial judge to act on the #Trump admin’s pending request to dismiss Bannon’s conviction & indictment “in the interests of justice” [rewriting history].

    The dismissal would be largely symbolic. #SteveBannon served a 4-month prison term after a #jury #convicted him of #contempt of #Congress in 2022. A federal appeals court in Washington upheld the conviction.

    #SCOTUS #law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower

  16. The move frees a trial judge to act on the #Trump admin’s pending request to dismiss Bannon’s conviction & indictment “in the interests of justice” [rewriting history].

    The dismissal would be largely symbolic. #SteveBannon served a 4-month prison term after a #jury #convicted him of #contempt of #Congress in 2022. A federal appeals court in Washington upheld the conviction.

    #SCOTUS #law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower

  17. The move frees a trial judge to act on the #Trump admin’s pending request to dismiss Bannon’s conviction & indictment “in the interests of justice” [rewriting history].

    The dismissal would be largely symbolic. #SteveBannon served a 4-month prison term after a #jury #convicted him of #contempt of #Congress in 2022. A federal appeals court in Washington upheld the conviction.

    #SCOTUS #law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower

  18. The move frees a trial judge to act on the #Trump admin’s pending request to dismiss Bannon’s conviction & indictment “in the interests of justice” [rewriting history].

    The dismissal would be largely symbolic. #SteveBannon served a 4-month prison term after a #jury #convicted him of #contempt of #Congress in 2022. A federal appeals court in Washington upheld the conviction.

    #SCOTUS #law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower

  19. WTAF!?

    #SteveBannon wins #SCOTUS order likely to lead to dismissal of his #criminal #conviction for refusing to #Congress.

    “Prodded” [instructed] by the #Trump admin, the justices threw out an appellate ruling upholding Bannon’s conviction for defying a #subpoena from the #House committee that investigated the #Jan6, 2021 #insurrection by Trump supporters.

    #law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower
    apnews.com/article/supreme-cou

  20. WTAF!?

    #SteveBannon wins #SCOTUS order likely to lead to dismissal of his #criminal #conviction for refusing to #Congress.

    “Prodded” [instructed] by the #Trump admin, the justices threw out an appellate ruling upholding Bannon’s conviction for defying a #subpoena from the #House committee that investigated the #Jan6, 2021 #insurrection by Trump supporters.

    #law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower
    apnews.com/article/supreme-cou

  21. WTAF!?

    #SteveBannon wins #SCOTUS order likely to lead to dismissal of his #criminal #conviction for refusing to #Congress.

    “Prodded” [instructed] by the #Trump admin, the justices threw out an appellate ruling upholding Bannon’s conviction for defying a #subpoena from the #House committee that investigated the #Jan6, 2021 #insurrection by Trump supporters.

    #law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower
    apnews.com/article/supreme-cou

  22. WTAF!?

    #SteveBannon wins #SCOTUS order likely to lead to dismissal of his #criminal #conviction for refusing to #Congress.

    “Prodded” [instructed] by the #Trump admin, the justices threw out an appellate ruling upholding Bannon’s conviction for defying a #subpoena from the #House committee that investigated the #Jan6, 2021 #insurrection by Trump supporters.

    #law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower
    apnews.com/article/supreme-cou

  23. WTAF!?

    #SteveBannon wins #SCOTUS order likely to lead to dismissal of his #criminal #conviction for refusing to #Congress.

    “Prodded” [instructed] by the #Trump admin, the justices threw out an appellate ruling upholding Bannon’s conviction for defying a #subpoena from the #House committee that investigated the #Jan6, 2021 #insurrection by Trump supporters.

    #law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower
    apnews.com/article/supreme-cou

  24. Federal court halts Trump ballroom after historic White House damage

    Federal court halts Trump ballroom as a judge questions unilateral presidential power after historic White House structures were demolished without Congress.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  25. Pam Bondi Subpoena Congressional Oversight Crisis Deepens

    Pam Bondi subpoena congressional oversight exposes growing constitutional conflict as lawmakers demand answers on Epstein files and executive accountability.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  26. This really feels like the separation of powers is being stress tested in real time. The system is supposed to check itself, but lately that feels less certain. #DOJ #SCOTUS #USPol #USConstitution #SeparationOfPowers

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:qobvnkudcv3zlaklxxjduqoi/post/3mgzn5cqavp2r

  27. ② Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C. 25-cv-00916, decided 2025-05-23) courtlistener.com/docket/69807

    > This case arises from one of a series of executive orders targeting law firms that, in one way or another, did not bow to the current presidential administration’s political orthodoxy. Like the others in the series, this order — which takes aim at the global law firm Jenner & Block — makes no bones about why it chose its target: it picked Jenner because of the causes Jenner champions, the clients Jenner represents, and a lawyer Jenner once employed. Going after law firms in this way is doubly violative of the #Constitution. Most obviously, retaliating against firms for the views embodied in their legal work — and thereby seeking to muzzle them going forward — violates the First Amendment's central command that government may not “use the power of the State to punish or suppress disfavored expression.” .... More subtle but perhaps more pernicious is the message the order sends to the lawyers whose unalloyed advocacy protects against governmental viewpoint becoming government-imposed orthodoxy. This order, like the others, seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn’t like, thereby insulating the Executive Branch from the judicial check fundamental to the #SeparationOfPowers. It thus violates the Constitution and the Court will enjoin its operation in full.

    ...

    > #ExecutiveOrder 14246 violates settled #FirstAmendment law and its operation must be enjoined in full.

    — Judge #JohnBates, Docket 138

  28. ② Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C. 25-cv-00916, decided 2025-05-23) courtlistener.com/docket/69807

    > This case arises from one of a series of executive orders targeting law firms that, in one way or another, did not bow to the current presidential administration’s political orthodoxy. Like the others in the series, this order — which takes aim at the global law firm Jenner & Block — makes no bones about why it chose its target: it picked Jenner because of the causes Jenner champions, the clients Jenner represents, and a lawyer Jenner once employed. Going after law firms in this way is doubly violative of the #Constitution. Most obviously, retaliating against firms for the views embodied in their legal work — and thereby seeking to muzzle them going forward — violates the First Amendment's central command that government may not “use the power of the State to punish or suppress disfavored expression.” .... More subtle but perhaps more pernicious is the message the order sends to the lawyers whose unalloyed advocacy protects against governmental viewpoint becoming government-imposed orthodoxy. This order, like the others, seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn’t like, thereby insulating the Executive Branch from the judicial check fundamental to the #SeparationOfPowers. It thus violates the Constitution and the Court will enjoin its operation in full.

    ...

    > #ExecutiveOrder 14246 violates settled #FirstAmendment law and its operation must be enjoined in full.

    — Judge #JohnBates, Docket 138

  29. ② Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C. 25-cv-00916, decided 2025-05-23) courtlistener.com/docket/69807

    > This case arises from one of a series of executive orders targeting law firms that, in one way or another, did not bow to the current presidential administration’s political orthodoxy. Like the others in the series, this order — which takes aim at the global law firm Jenner & Block — makes no bones about why it chose its target: it picked Jenner because of the causes Jenner champions, the clients Jenner represents, and a lawyer Jenner once employed. Going after law firms in this way is doubly violative of the #Constitution. Most obviously, retaliating against firms for the views embodied in their legal work — and thereby seeking to muzzle them going forward — violates the First Amendment's central command that government may not “use the power of the State to punish or suppress disfavored expression.” .... More subtle but perhaps more pernicious is the message the order sends to the lawyers whose unalloyed advocacy protects against governmental viewpoint becoming government-imposed orthodoxy. This order, like the others, seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn’t like, thereby insulating the Executive Branch from the judicial check fundamental to the #SeparationOfPowers. It thus violates the Constitution and the Court will enjoin its operation in full.

    ...

    > #ExecutiveOrder 14246 violates settled #FirstAmendment law and its operation must be enjoined in full.

    — Judge #JohnBates, Docket 138

  30. ② Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C. 25-cv-00916, decided 2025-05-23) courtlistener.com/docket/69807

    > This case arises from one of a series of executive orders targeting law firms that, in one way or another, did not bow to the current presidential administration’s political orthodoxy. Like the others in the series, this order — which takes aim at the global law firm Jenner & Block — makes no bones about why it chose its target: it picked Jenner because of the causes Jenner champions, the clients Jenner represents, and a lawyer Jenner once employed. Going after law firms in this way is doubly violative of the #Constitution. Most obviously, retaliating against firms for the views embodied in their legal work — and thereby seeking to muzzle them going forward — violates the First Amendment's central command that government may not “use the power of the State to punish or suppress disfavored expression.” .... More subtle but perhaps more pernicious is the message the order sends to the lawyers whose unalloyed advocacy protects against governmental viewpoint becoming government-imposed orthodoxy. This order, like the others, seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn’t like, thereby insulating the Executive Branch from the judicial check fundamental to the #SeparationOfPowers. It thus violates the Constitution and the Court will enjoin its operation in full.

    ...

    > #ExecutiveOrder 14246 violates settled #FirstAmendment law and its operation must be enjoined in full.

    — Judge #JohnBates, Docket 138

  31. ② Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C. 25-cv-00916, decided 2025-05-23) courtlistener.com/docket/69807

    > This case arises from one of a series of executive orders targeting law firms that, in one way or another, did not bow to the current presidential administration’s political orthodoxy. Like the others in the series, this order — which takes aim at the global law firm Jenner & Block — makes no bones about why it chose its target: it picked Jenner because of the causes Jenner champions, the clients Jenner represents, and a lawyer Jenner once employed. Going after law firms in this way is doubly violative of the #Constitution. Most obviously, retaliating against firms for the views embodied in their legal work — and thereby seeking to muzzle them going forward — violates the First Amendment's central command that government may not “use the power of the State to punish or suppress disfavored expression.” .... More subtle but perhaps more pernicious is the message the order sends to the lawyers whose unalloyed advocacy protects against governmental viewpoint becoming government-imposed orthodoxy. This order, like the others, seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn’t like, thereby insulating the Executive Branch from the judicial check fundamental to the #SeparationOfPowers. It thus violates the Constitution and the Court will enjoin its operation in full.

    ...

    > #ExecutiveOrder 14246 violates settled #FirstAmendment law and its operation must be enjoined in full.

    — Judge #JohnBates, Docket 138

  32. Congressional approval for war with Iran is missing and Congress is letting it happen

    Congressional approval for war with Iran is missing, and that gap is not technical. It is the core accountability failure that turns conflict into drift.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-