home.social

#presidentialpower — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #presidentialpower, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Opinion | The Iran War Worsens America’s Democratic Erosion

    By The Editorial Board The editorial board is a group of opinion journalists whose views are informed by…
    #NewsBeep #News #BreakingNews #Authoritarianism(TheoryandPhilosophy) #breakingnews #Democracy(TheoryandPhilosophy) #DonaldJ #HouseofRepresentatives #Iran #PresidentialPower(US) #Senate #Trump #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesPoliticsandGovernment #WarandEmergencyPowers(US)
    newsbeep.com/536104/

  2. Federal court halts Trump ballroom after historic White House damage

    Federal court halts Trump ballroom as a judge questions unilateral presidential power after historic White House structures were demolished without Congress.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  3. Supreme Court Limits Presidential Power to Impose Tariffs

    The US Supreme Court ruled that only Congress can add tariffs, limiting the President's power. This affects trade and presidential emergency powers. Refunds are pending.

    #SupremeCourt, #Tariffs, #Congress, #PresidentialPower, #TradeLaw

    newsletter.tf/supreme-court-li

  4. Supreme Court Limits Presidential Power to Impose Tariffs

    The US Supreme Court ruled that only Congress can add tariffs, limiting the President's power. This affects trade and presidential emergency powers. Refunds are pending.

    #SupremeCourt, #Tariffs, #Congress, #PresidentialPower, #TradeLaw

    newsletter.tf/supreme-court-li

  5. The Supreme Court ruled that only Congress can impose tariffs, a major change from President Trump's emergency powers. This decision means future tariffs need Congress's approval.

    #SupremeCourt, #Tariffs, #Congress, #PresidentialPower, #TradeLaw

    newsletter.tf/supreme-court-li

  6. The Supreme Court ruled that only Congress can impose tariffs, a major change from President Trump's emergency powers. This decision means future tariffs need Congress's approval.

    #SupremeCourt, #Tariffs, #Congress, #PresidentialPower, #TradeLaw

    newsletter.tf/supreme-court-li

  7. US Supreme Court Limits President’s Use of Emergency Law for Global Tariffs

    The US Supreme Court ruled Friday that the president cannot use emergency law for global tariffs. This stops about half of taxes on foreign goods, affecting consumers and government income.

    #SupremeCourt, #Tariffs, #TradeLaw, #PresidentialPower, #USeconomy

    newsletter.tf/us-supreme-court

  8. US Supreme Court Limits President’s Use of Emergency Law for Global Tariffs

    The US Supreme Court ruled Friday that the president cannot use emergency law for global tariffs. This stops about half of taxes on foreign goods, affecting consumers and government income.

    #SupremeCourt, #Tariffs, #TradeLaw, #PresidentialPower, #USeconomy

    newsletter.tf/us-supreme-court

  9. The US Supreme Court stopped most global tariffs on Friday, which had collected billions for the government. This is a big change for how the president can make trade rules.

    #SupremeCourt, #Tariffs, #TradeLaw, #PresidentialPower, #USeconomy

    newsletter.tf/us-supreme-court

  10. The US Supreme Court stopped most global tariffs on Friday, which had collected billions for the government. This is a big change for how the president can make trade rules.

    #SupremeCourt, #Tariffs, #TradeLaw, #PresidentialPower, #USeconomy

    newsletter.tf/us-supreme-court

  11. Supreme Court Overturns President Trump's Broad Tariffs

    Supreme Court ruled President Trump exceeded authority on tariffs. This affects global trade, businesses, and consumers. Find out what happens next.

    #SupremeCourt, #TrumpTariffs, #TradeLaw, #PresidentialPower, #EconomicPolicy

    newsletter.tf/supreme-court-ru

  12. Supreme Court Overturns President Trump's Broad Tariffs

    Supreme Court ruled President Trump exceeded authority on tariffs. This affects global trade, businesses, and consumers. Find out what happens next.

    #SupremeCourt, #TrumpTariffs, #TradeLaw, #PresidentialPower, #EconomicPolicy

    newsletter.tf/supreme-court-ru

  13. Trump deleting records exposes a dangerous attempt to rewrite history

    Trump deleting records is part of a broader pattern: erase what contradicts him, attack the archives, and reshape history to suit his ego.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/2026/

  14. Tracking the Lawsuits Against the Trump Administration: Immigration, Tariffs and More

    Access to federal property The White House has used its power over access to federal property to single…
    #UnitedStates #US #USA #2021 #CitizenshipandNaturalization #DonaldJ #elon #FederalCourts(US) #Musk #PresidentialPower(US) #StormingoftheUSCapitol(Jan #SuitsandLitigation(Civil) #trump
    europesays.com/2740603/

  15. The Roberts court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with these key exceptions – Los Angeles Times

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, foreground, and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett attend President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress in March. (Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    Politics

    The Supreme Court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with key exceptions

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, foreground, and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett attend President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress in March.
    (Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    By David G. Savage, Staff Writer Follow. Jan. 1, 2026 3 AM PT

    • For much of the year, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and the five other conservatives were in the majority ruling for Trump.
    • The court has been criticized for handing down temporary unsigned orders with little or no explanation.

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., ended the first year of President Trump’s second term with a record of rulings that gave him much broader power to control the federal government.

    In a series of fast-track decisions, the justices granted emergency appeals and set aside rulings from district judges who blocked Trump’s orders from taking effect.

    With the court’s approval, the administration dismissed thousands of federal employees, cut funding for education and health research grants, dismantled the agency that funds foreign aid and cleared the way for the U.S. military to reject transgender troops.

    But the court also put two important checks on the president’s power.

    In April, the court twice ruled — including in a post-midnight order — that the Trump administration could not secretly whisk immigrants out of the country without giving them a hearing before a judge.

    Upon taking office, Trump claimed migrants who were alleged to belong to “foreign terrorist” gangs could be arrested as “enemy aliens” and flown secretly to a prison in El Salvador.

    See caption and more at below link.

    https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-12-23/supreme-court-trump-national-guard-chicago – See more at the above link.

    Politics

    Supreme Court rules against Trump, bars National Guard deployment in Chicago, Dec. 23, 2025

    Roberts and the court blocked such secret deportations and said the 5th Amendment entitles immigrants, like citizens, a right to “due process of law.” Many of the arrested men had no criminal records and said they never belonged to a criminal gang.
    Those who face deportation “are entitled to notice and opportunity to challenge their removal,” the justices said in Trump vs. J.G.G.

    They also required the government to “facilitate” the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who had been wrongly deported to El Salvador. He is now back in Maryland with his wife, but may face further criminal charges or efforts to deport him.

    And last week, Roberts and the court barred Trump from deploying the National Guard in Chicago to enforce the immigration laws.

    Trump had claimed he had the power to defy state governors and deploy the Guard troops in Los Angeles, Portland, Ore., Chicago and other Democratic-led states and cities.

    The Supreme Court disagreed over dissents from conservative Justices Samuel A. Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch.

    Editor’s Note: Read the rest of the story, at the below link.

    Continue/Read Original Article Here: The Roberts court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with these key exceptions – Los Angeles Times

    Tags: 2025, America, Chief Justice Roberts, Donald Trump, Health, History, Libraries, Library, Library of Congress, Los Angeles Times, National Guard, Only Two Checks, Opinion, Politics, Presidential Power, Republicans, Resistance, Right-Wing Votes, Roberts Court, Science, SCOTUS, Supreme Court of the United States, The Los Angeles Times, Trump, Trump Administration, Trump's Power, United States
    #2025 #America #ChiefJusticeRoberts #DonaldTrump #Health #History #Libraries #Library #LibraryOfCongress #LosAngelesTimes #NationalGuard #OnlyTwoChecks #Opinion #Politics #PresidentialPower #Republicans #Resistance #RightWingVotes #RobertsCourt #Science #SCOTUS #SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStates #TheLosAngelesTimes #Trump #TrumpAdministration #TrumpSPower #UnitedStates
  16. The Roberts court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with these key exceptions – Los Angeles Times

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, foreground, and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett attend President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress in March. (Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    Politics

    The Supreme Court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with key exceptions

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, foreground, and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett attend President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress in March.
    (Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    By David G. Savage, Staff Writer Follow. Jan. 1, 2026 3 AM PT

    • For much of the year, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and the five other conservatives were in the majority ruling for Trump.
    • The court has been criticized for handing down temporary unsigned orders with little or no explanation.

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., ended the first year of President Trump’s second term with a record of rulings that gave him much broader power to control the federal government.

    In a series of fast-track decisions, the justices granted emergency appeals and set aside rulings from district judges who blocked Trump’s orders from taking effect.

    With the court’s approval, the administration dismissed thousands of federal employees, cut funding for education and health research grants, dismantled the agency that funds foreign aid and cleared the way for the U.S. military to reject transgender troops.

    But the court also put two important checks on the president’s power.

    In April, the court twice ruled — including in a post-midnight order — that the Trump administration could not secretly whisk immigrants out of the country without giving them a hearing before a judge.

    Upon taking office, Trump claimed migrants who were alleged to belong to “foreign terrorist” gangs could be arrested as “enemy aliens” and flown secretly to a prison in El Salvador.

    See caption and more at below link.

    https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-12-23/supreme-court-trump-national-guard-chicago – See more at the above link.

    Politics

    Supreme Court rules against Trump, bars National Guard deployment in Chicago, Dec. 23, 2025

    Roberts and the court blocked such secret deportations and said the 5th Amendment entitles immigrants, like citizens, a right to “due process of law.” Many of the arrested men had no criminal records and said they never belonged to a criminal gang.
    Those who face deportation “are entitled to notice and opportunity to challenge their removal,” the justices said in Trump vs. J.G.G.

    They also required the government to “facilitate” the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who had been wrongly deported to El Salvador. He is now back in Maryland with his wife, but may face further criminal charges or efforts to deport him.

    And last week, Roberts and the court barred Trump from deploying the National Guard in Chicago to enforce the immigration laws.

    Trump had claimed he had the power to defy state governors and deploy the Guard troops in Los Angeles, Portland, Ore., Chicago and other Democratic-led states and cities.

    The Supreme Court disagreed over dissents from conservative Justices Samuel A. Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch.

    Editor’s Note: Read the rest of the story, at the below link.

    Continue/Read Original Article Here: The Roberts court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with these key exceptions – Los Angeles Times

    Tags: 2025, America, Chief Justice Roberts, Donald Trump, Health, History, Libraries, Library, Library of Congress, Los Angeles Times, National Guard, Only Two Checks, Opinion, Politics, Presidential Power, Republicans, Resistance, Right-Wing Votes, Roberts Court, Science, SCOTUS, Supreme Court of the United States, The Los Angeles Times, Trump, Trump Administration, Trump's Power, United States
    #2025 #America #ChiefJusticeRoberts #DonaldTrump #Health #History #Libraries #Library #LibraryOfCongress #LosAngelesTimes #NationalGuard #OnlyTwoChecks #Opinion #Politics #PresidentialPower #Republicans #Resistance #RightWingVotes #RobertsCourt #Science #SCOTUS #SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStates #TheLosAngelesTimes #Trump #TrumpAdministration #TrumpSPower #UnitedStates
  17. The Roberts court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with these key exceptions – Los Angeles Times

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, foreground, and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett attend President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress in March. (Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    Politics

    The Supreme Court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with key exceptions

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, foreground, and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett attend President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress in March.
    (Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    By David G. Savage, Staff Writer Follow. Jan. 1, 2026 3 AM PT

    • For much of the year, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and the five other conservatives were in the majority ruling for Trump.
    • The court has been criticized for handing down temporary unsigned orders with little or no explanation.

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., ended the first year of President Trump’s second term with a record of rulings that gave him much broader power to control the federal government.

    In a series of fast-track decisions, the justices granted emergency appeals and set aside rulings from district judges who blocked Trump’s orders from taking effect.

    With the court’s approval, the administration dismissed thousands of federal employees, cut funding for education and health research grants, dismantled the agency that funds foreign aid and cleared the way for the U.S. military to reject transgender troops.

    But the court also put two important checks on the president’s power.

    In April, the court twice ruled — including in a post-midnight order — that the Trump administration could not secretly whisk immigrants out of the country without giving them a hearing before a judge.

    Upon taking office, Trump claimed migrants who were alleged to belong to “foreign terrorist” gangs could be arrested as “enemy aliens” and flown secretly to a prison in El Salvador.

    See caption and more at below link.

    https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-12-23/supreme-court-trump-national-guard-chicago – See more at the above link.

    Politics

    Supreme Court rules against Trump, bars National Guard deployment in Chicago, Dec. 23, 2025

    Roberts and the court blocked such secret deportations and said the 5th Amendment entitles immigrants, like citizens, a right to “due process of law.” Many of the arrested men had no criminal records and said they never belonged to a criminal gang.
    Those who face deportation “are entitled to notice and opportunity to challenge their removal,” the justices said in Trump vs. J.G.G.

    They also required the government to “facilitate” the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who had been wrongly deported to El Salvador. He is now back in Maryland with his wife, but may face further criminal charges or efforts to deport him.

    And last week, Roberts and the court barred Trump from deploying the National Guard in Chicago to enforce the immigration laws.

    Trump had claimed he had the power to defy state governors and deploy the Guard troops in Los Angeles, Portland, Ore., Chicago and other Democratic-led states and cities.

    The Supreme Court disagreed over dissents from conservative Justices Samuel A. Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch.

    Editor’s Note: Read the rest of the story, at the below link.

    Continue/Read Original Article Here: The Roberts court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with these key exceptions – Los Angeles Times

    Tags: 2025, America, Chief Justice Roberts, Donald Trump, Health, History, Libraries, Library, Library of Congress, Los Angeles Times, National Guard, Only Two Checks, Opinion, Politics, Presidential Power, Republicans, Resistance, Right-Wing Votes, Roberts Court, Science, SCOTUS, Supreme Court of the United States, The Los Angeles Times, Trump, Trump Administration, Trump's Power, United States
    #2025 #America #ChiefJusticeRoberts #DonaldTrump #Health #History #Libraries #Library #LibraryOfCongress #LosAngelesTimes #NationalGuard #OnlyTwoChecks #Opinion #Politics #PresidentialPower #Republicans #Resistance #RightWingVotes #RobertsCourt #Science #SCOTUS #SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStates #TheLosAngelesTimes #Trump #TrumpAdministration #TrumpSPower #UnitedStates
  18. The Roberts court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with these key exceptions – Los Angeles Times

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, foreground, and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett attend President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress in March. (Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    Politics

    The Supreme Court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with key exceptions

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, foreground, and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett attend President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress in March.
    (Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    By David G. Savage, Staff Writer Follow. Jan. 1, 2026 3 AM PT

    • For much of the year, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and the five other conservatives were in the majority ruling for Trump.
    • The court has been criticized for handing down temporary unsigned orders with little or no explanation.

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., ended the first year of President Trump’s second term with a record of rulings that gave him much broader power to control the federal government.

    In a series of fast-track decisions, the justices granted emergency appeals and set aside rulings from district judges who blocked Trump’s orders from taking effect.

    With the court’s approval, the administration dismissed thousands of federal employees, cut funding for education and health research grants, dismantled the agency that funds foreign aid and cleared the way for the U.S. military to reject transgender troops.

    But the court also put two important checks on the president’s power.

    In April, the court twice ruled — including in a post-midnight order — that the Trump administration could not secretly whisk immigrants out of the country without giving them a hearing before a judge.

    Upon taking office, Trump claimed migrants who were alleged to belong to “foreign terrorist” gangs could be arrested as “enemy aliens” and flown secretly to a prison in El Salvador.

    See caption and more at below link.

    https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-12-23/supreme-court-trump-national-guard-chicago – See more at the above link.

    Politics

    Supreme Court rules against Trump, bars National Guard deployment in Chicago, Dec. 23, 2025

    Roberts and the court blocked such secret deportations and said the 5th Amendment entitles immigrants, like citizens, a right to “due process of law.” Many of the arrested men had no criminal records and said they never belonged to a criminal gang.
    Those who face deportation “are entitled to notice and opportunity to challenge their removal,” the justices said in Trump vs. J.G.G.

    They also required the government to “facilitate” the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who had been wrongly deported to El Salvador. He is now back in Maryland with his wife, but may face further criminal charges or efforts to deport him.

    And last week, Roberts and the court barred Trump from deploying the National Guard in Chicago to enforce the immigration laws.

    Trump had claimed he had the power to defy state governors and deploy the Guard troops in Los Angeles, Portland, Ore., Chicago and other Democratic-led states and cities.

    The Supreme Court disagreed over dissents from conservative Justices Samuel A. Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch.

    Editor’s Note: Read the rest of the story, at the below link.

    Continue/Read Original Article Here: The Roberts court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with these key exceptions – Los Angeles Times

    #2025 #America #ChiefJusticeRoberts #DonaldTrump #Health #History #Libraries #Library #LibraryOfCongress #LosAngelesTimes #NationalGuard #OnlyTwoChecks #Opinion #Politics #PresidentialPower #Republicans #Resistance #RightWingVotes #RobertsCourt #Science #SCOTUS #SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStates #TheLosAngelesTimes #Trump #TrumpAdministration #TrumpSPower #UnitedStates
  19. The Roberts court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with these key exceptions – Los Angeles Times

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, foreground, and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett attend President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress in March. (Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    Politics

    The Supreme Court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with key exceptions

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, foreground, and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett attend President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress in March.
    (Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    By David G. Savage, Staff Writer Follow. Jan. 1, 2026 3 AM PT

    • For much of the year, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and the five other conservatives were in the majority ruling for Trump.
    • The court has been criticized for handing down temporary unsigned orders with little or no explanation.

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., ended the first year of President Trump’s second term with a record of rulings that gave him much broader power to control the federal government.

    In a series of fast-track decisions, the justices granted emergency appeals and set aside rulings from district judges who blocked Trump’s orders from taking effect.

    With the court’s approval, the administration dismissed thousands of federal employees, cut funding for education and health research grants, dismantled the agency that funds foreign aid and cleared the way for the U.S. military to reject transgender troops.

    But the court also put two important checks on the president’s power.

    In April, the court twice ruled — including in a post-midnight order — that the Trump administration could not secretly whisk immigrants out of the country without giving them a hearing before a judge.

    Upon taking office, Trump claimed migrants who were alleged to belong to “foreign terrorist” gangs could be arrested as “enemy aliens” and flown secretly to a prison in El Salvador.

    See caption and more at below link.

    https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-12-23/supreme-court-trump-national-guard-chicago – See more at the above link.

    Politics

    Supreme Court rules against Trump, bars National Guard deployment in Chicago, Dec. 23, 2025

    Roberts and the court blocked such secret deportations and said the 5th Amendment entitles immigrants, like citizens, a right to “due process of law.” Many of the arrested men had no criminal records and said they never belonged to a criminal gang.
    Those who face deportation “are entitled to notice and opportunity to challenge their removal,” the justices said in Trump vs. J.G.G.

    They also required the government to “facilitate” the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who had been wrongly deported to El Salvador. He is now back in Maryland with his wife, but may face further criminal charges or efforts to deport him.

    And last week, Roberts and the court barred Trump from deploying the National Guard in Chicago to enforce the immigration laws.

    Trump had claimed he had the power to defy state governors and deploy the Guard troops in Los Angeles, Portland, Ore., Chicago and other Democratic-led states and cities.

    The Supreme Court disagreed over dissents from conservative Justices Samuel A. Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch.

    Editor’s Note: Read the rest of the story, at the below link.

    Continue/Read Original Article Here: The Roberts court broadly expanded Trump’s power in 2025, with these key exceptions – Los Angeles Times

    #2025 #America #ChiefJusticeRoberts #DonaldTrump #Health #History #Libraries #Library #LibraryOfCongress #LosAngelesTimes #NationalGuard #OnlyTwoChecks #Opinion #Politics #PresidentialPower #Republicans #Resistance #RightWingVotes #RobertsCourt #Science #SCOTUS #SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStates #TheLosAngelesTimes #Trump #TrumpAdministration #TrumpSPower #UnitedStates
  20. A Name Too Many: When Ego Tries to Rebrand History

    When a sitting president flirts with renaming the Kennedy Center, the issue is not branding or humor. It is a revealing glimpse into ego, insecurity, and a dangerous urge to overwrite history itself.

    jtwb7689.wordpress.com/2025/12

  21. A Name Too Many: When Ego Tries to Rebrand History

    When a sitting president flirts with renaming the Kennedy Center, the issue is not branding or humor. It is a revealing glimpse into ego, insecurity, and a dangerous urge to overwrite history itself.

    jtwb7689.wordpress.com/2025/12

  22. A Name Too Many: When Ego Tries to Rebrand History

    When a sitting president flirts with renaming the Kennedy Center, the issue is not branding or humor. It is a revealing glimpse into ego, insecurity, and a dangerous urge to overwrite history itself.

    jtwb7689.wordpress.com/2025/12

  23. A Name Too Many: When Ego Tries to Rebrand History

    When a sitting president flirts with renaming the Kennedy Center, the issue is not branding or humor. It is a revealing glimpse into ego, insecurity, and a dangerous urge to overwrite history itself.

    jtwb7689.wordpress.com/2025/12

  24. A Name Too Many: When Ego Tries to Rebrand History

    When a sitting president flirts with renaming the Kennedy Center, the issue is not branding or humor. It is a revealing glimpse into ego, insecurity, and a dangerous urge to overwrite history itself.

    jtwb7689.wordpress.com/2025/12

  25. US Supreme Court 2025-2026 term addresses presidential powers, transgender rights, tariffs, and voting discrimination. The Court's recent decisions including restrictions on nationwide injunctions significantly expand executive authority and reshape federal judicial oversight of administration policies.

    #SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtDecisions #PresidentialPower #CourtRulings

  26. Friday’s ruling will lead to a drastic reduction in the #FederalCourts’ ability to check the White House, according to Judith Resnik, a professor at Yale Law School. #NationwideInjunctions give #courts “the capacity to tell the key nationwide actor, the #ExecutiveBranch, to behave lawfully,” she said.

    #FuckSCOTUS #law #SCOTUS #Constitution #democracy #Judiciary #SeparationOfPowers #Trump #PresidentialPower #AbuseOfPower

  27. Critics have accused the #Trump admin of flouting the #law in its aggressive use of #ExecutivePower, including by retaliating against perceived enemies & dismantling agencies created by #Congress.

    The Trump admin has broadly defended its actions as within the legal bounds of #PresidentialPower & has won several early victories at #SCOTUS. A WH spox told Reuters that Trump's actions were legal, & declined to comment on the departures.

    #lawless #felon47 #judiciary #RuleOfLaw #constitution

  28. — $2 billion in congressionally appropriated #ForeignAid flowing through the #State Dept & #USAID frozen by #Trump

    — >25k children face deportation without lawyers because the admin cut off a contract that pays for their legal representation

    And that’s just a few of the cases with #NationwideInjunctions.

    #FuckSCOTUS #law #SCOTUS #Constitution #democracy #Judiciary #SeparationOfPowers #ExecutiveBranch #PresidentialPower #AbuseOfPower

  29. Still, #SCOTUS’ ruling doesn’t mean they will instantly evaporate. Experts say the next step is for individual courts to apply the new precedent in their own cases. In some instances, the #DOJ will likely challenge existing #NationwideInjunctions to see if they need to be pared back under the Supreme Court’s new precedent.

    #FuckSCOTUS #law #Constitution #democracy #Judiciary #SeparationOfPowers #Trump #ExecutiveBranch #PresidentialPower #AbuseOfPower

  30. District-court judges have repeatedly used #NationwideInjunctions to block #Trump admin policies, including to halt the #MassFirings of civil servants, the defunding of #ForeignAid & the relocation of #transgender women in #FederalPrisons to men’s housing. Some of those injunctions have been lifted by higher courts; many, including those detailed below, remain in place, …for now.

    #FuckSCOTUS #law #SCOTUS #Constitution #democracy #Judiciary #SeparationOfPowers #PresidentialPower #AbuseOfPower

  31. #JoshHawley introduces #Senate bill to limit #power of #FederalJudges in wake of #DJT insolence over checks and balances from #judiciary branch as #WhiteHouse steps up attacks on judges who place limits on #PresidentialPower. House #GOP are already pursuing #impeachment against more than a half-dozen federal district court judges who made rulings against #Drumpf.

    #GiftLink #SharedStory and wapo.st/4iBukwD

  32. Letters from an American – July 15, 2025 – by Heather Cox Richardson

    By Heather Cox Richardson, July 15, 2025

    Heather Cox Richardson

    Without any explanation, the right-wing majority on the Supreme Court yesterday granted a stay on a lower court’s order that the Trump administration could not gut the Department of Education while the issue is in the courts. The majority thus throws the weight of the Supreme Court behind the ability of the Trump administration to get rid of departments established by Congress—a power the Supreme Court denied when President Richard M. Nixon tried it in 1973.

    This is a major expansion of presidential power, permitting the president to disregard laws Congress has passed, despite the Constitution’s clear assignment of lawmaking power to Congress alone.

    President Donald J. Trump has vowed to eliminate the Department of Education because he claims it pushes “woke” ideology on America’s schoolchildren and that its employees “hate our children.” Running for office, he promised to “return” education to the states. In fact, the Education Department has never set curriculum; it disburses funds for high-poverty schools and educating students with disabilities. It’s also in charge of prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race and sex in schools that get federal funding.

    Trump’s secretary of education, professional wrestling promoter Linda McMahon, supports Trump’s plan to dismantle the department. In March the department announced it would lay off 1,378 employees—about half the department. Nineteen states and the District of Columbia sued to stop the layoffs, and Massachusetts federal judge Myong Joun ordered the department to reinstate the fired workers. The Supreme Court has now put that order on hold, permitting the layoffs to go forward.

    Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan concurred in a dissent written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, noting that Trump has claimed power to destroy the congressionally established department “by executive fiat” and chastising the right-wing majority for enabling him. “When the Executive publicly announces its intent to break the law, and then executes on that promise, it is the Judiciary’s duty to check that lawlessness, not expedite it,” they say.

    “The President must take care that the laws are faithfully executed, not set out to dismantle them. That basic rule undergirds our Constitution’s separation of powers. Yet today, the majority rewards clear defiance of that core principle with emergency relief.”

    Editor’s Note: Read the rest of the story, at the below link.

    Continue/Read Original Article Here: July 15, 2025 – by Heather Cox Richardson

    #1973 #2025 #America #Children #DepartmentOfEducation #DonaldTrump #Education #History #Libraries #LibraryOfCongress #Nixon #Politics #PresidentialPower #PublicSchools #Resistance #Science #SCOTUS #SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStates #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates