home.social

#nationwideinjunctions — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #nationwideinjunctions, aggregated by home.social.

  1. #SCOTUS’ decision restricted the #power of lower-court judges to issue #NationwideInjunctions.

    The states have argued #Trump’s #BirthrightCitizenship order is blatantly #unconstitutional & threatens millions of dollars for #HealthInsurance contingent on #citizenship. The issue is expected to move quickly back to SCOTUS.

    #law #AbuseOfPower

  2. #SCOTUS’ decision restricted the #power of lower-court judges to issue #NationwideInjunctions.

    The states have argued #Trump’s #BirthrightCitizenship order is blatantly #unconstitutional & threatens millions of dollars for #HealthInsurance contingent on #citizenship. The issue is expected to move quickly back to SCOTUS.

    #law #AbuseOfPower

  3. #SCOTUS’ decision restricted the #power of lower-court judges to issue #NationwideInjunctions.

    The states have argued #Trump’s #BirthrightCitizenship order is blatantly #unconstitutional & threatens millions of dollars for #HealthInsurance contingent on #citizenship. The issue is expected to move quickly back to SCOTUS.

    #law #AbuseOfPower

  4. #SCOTUS’ decision restricted the #power of lower-court judges to issue #NationwideInjunctions.

    The states have argued #Trump’s #BirthrightCitizenship order is blatantly #unconstitutional & threatens millions of dollars for #HealthInsurance contingent on #citizenship. The issue is expected to move quickly back to SCOTUS.

    #law #AbuseOfPower

  5. #SCOTUS’ decision restricted the #power of lower-court judges to issue #NationwideInjunctions.

    The states have argued #Trump’s #BirthrightCitizenship order is blatantly #unconstitutional & threatens millions of dollars for #HealthInsurance contingent on #citizenship. The issue is expected to move quickly back to SCOTUS.

    #law #AbuseOfPower

  6. The #SCOTUS June decision to scale back the ability of lower #courts to issue #NationwideInjunctions, & the administration’s success at persuading the justices to overturn about a dozen temporary blocks on its agenda in recent months, might only embolden #Trump officials to defy lower courts, several #legal experts said.

    #law #judiciary #Constitution #democracy #SeparationOfPowers #Autocracy #AbuseOfPower

  7. The #SCOTUS June decision to scale back the ability of lower #courts to issue #NationwideInjunctions, & the administration’s success at persuading the justices to overturn about a dozen temporary blocks on its agenda in recent months, might only embolden #Trump officials to defy lower courts, several #legal experts said.

    #law #judiciary #Constitution #democracy #SeparationOfPowers #Autocracy #AbuseOfPower

  8. The #SCOTUS June decision to scale back the ability of lower #courts to issue #NationwideInjunctions, & the administration’s success at persuading the justices to overturn about a dozen temporary blocks on its agenda in recent months, might only embolden #Trump officials to defy lower courts, several #legal experts said.

    #law #judiciary #Constitution #democracy #SeparationOfPowers #Autocracy #AbuseOfPower

  9. The #SCOTUS June decision to scale back the ability of lower #courts to issue #NationwideInjunctions, & the administration’s success at persuading the justices to overturn about a dozen temporary blocks on its agenda in recent months, might only embolden #Trump officials to defy lower courts, several #legal experts said.

    #law #judiciary #Constitution #democracy #SeparationOfPowers #Autocracy #AbuseOfPower

  10. The #SCOTUS June decision to scale back the ability of lower #courts to issue #NationwideInjunctions, & the administration’s success at persuading the justices to overturn about a dozen temporary blocks on its agenda in recent months, might only embolden #Trump officials to defy lower courts, several #legal experts said.

    #law #judiciary #Constitution #democracy #SeparationOfPowers #Autocracy #AbuseOfPower

  11. But #SCOTUS raised the possibility that #NationwideInjunctions are still permissible in certain circumstances, including #ClassActions, in which similarly situated people sue as a group, or if they are the only way to provide "complete relief" to litigants in a particular lawsuit.

    Friday's hearing will shed light on how lower courts plan to address what providing complete relief entails, said George Washington University law professor Paul Schiff Berman.

    #Trump #law #judiciary #Constitution

  12. But #SCOTUS raised the possibility that #NationwideInjunctions are still permissible in certain circumstances, including #ClassActions, in which similarly situated people sue as a group, or if they are the only way to provide "complete relief" to litigants in a particular lawsuit.

    Friday's hearing will shed light on how lower courts plan to address what providing complete relief entails, said George Washington University law professor Paul Schiff Berman.

    #Trump #law #judiciary #Constitution

  13. But #SCOTUS raised the possibility that #NationwideInjunctions are still permissible in certain circumstances, including #ClassActions, in which similarly situated people sue as a group, or if they are the only way to provide "complete relief" to litigants in a particular lawsuit.

    Friday's hearing will shed light on how lower courts plan to address what providing complete relief entails, said George Washington University law professor Paul Schiff Berman.

    #Trump #law #judiciary #Constitution

  14. But #SCOTUS raised the possibility that #NationwideInjunctions are still permissible in certain circumstances, including #ClassActions, in which similarly situated people sue as a group, or if they are the only way to provide "complete relief" to litigants in a particular lawsuit.

    Friday's hearing will shed light on how lower courts plan to address what providing complete relief entails, said George Washington University law professor Paul Schiff Berman.

    #Trump #law #judiciary #Constitution

  15. But #SCOTUS raised the possibility that #NationwideInjunctions are still permissible in certain circumstances, including #ClassActions, in which similarly situated people sue as a group, or if they are the only way to provide "complete relief" to litigants in a particular lawsuit.

    Friday's hearing will shed light on how lower courts plan to address what providing complete relief entails, said George Washington University law professor Paul Schiff Berman.

    #Trump #law #judiciary #Constitution

  16. In that 6-3 ruling authored by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, #SCOTUS directed lower court #judges like Sorokin that had blocked #Trump's policy to reconsider the scope of their orders.

    Rather than address the legality of #Trump's executive order, the justices used the case to discourage nationwide, or “universal,” injunctions — in which a single district court judge can block enforcement of a federal policy across the country.

    #law #judiciary #Constitution #NationwideInjunctions

  17. In that 6-3 ruling authored by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, #SCOTUS directed lower court #judges like Sorokin that had blocked #Trump's policy to reconsider the scope of their orders.

    Rather than address the legality of #Trump's executive order, the justices used the case to discourage nationwide, or “universal,” injunctions — in which a single district court judge can block enforcement of a federal policy across the country.

    #law #judiciary #Constitution #NationwideInjunctions

  18. In that 6-3 ruling authored by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, #SCOTUS directed lower court #judges like Sorokin that had blocked #Trump's policy to reconsider the scope of their orders.

    Rather than address the legality of #Trump's executive order, the justices used the case to discourage nationwide, or “universal,” injunctions — in which a single district court judge can block enforcement of a federal policy across the country.

    #law #judiciary #Constitution #NationwideInjunctions

  19. In that 6-3 ruling authored by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, #SCOTUS directed lower court #judges like Sorokin that had blocked #Trump's policy to reconsider the scope of their orders.

    Rather than address the legality of #Trump's executive order, the justices used the case to discourage nationwide, or “universal,” injunctions — in which a single district court judge can block enforcement of a federal policy across the country.

    #law #judiciary #Constitution #NationwideInjunctions

  20. In that 6-3 ruling authored by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, #SCOTUS directed lower court #judges like Sorokin that had blocked #Trump's policy to reconsider the scope of their orders.

    Rather than address the legality of #Trump's executive order, the justices used the case to discourage nationwide, or “universal,” injunctions — in which a single district court judge can block enforcement of a federal policy across the country.

    #law #judiciary #Constitution #NationwideInjunctions

  21. #Trump’s EO directs US agencies to refuse to recognize the #citizenship of children born in the #US after Feb 19 if neither their mother nor father is a US #citizen or lawful permanent resident.

    The #states' case is back in Sorokin's courtroom so he can assess the impact of #SCOTUS’ *landmark* [insane] June 27th decision.

    #law #Constitution #NationwideInjunctions

  22. #Trump’s EO directs US agencies to refuse to recognize the #citizenship of children born in the #US after Feb 19 if neither their mother nor father is a US #citizen or lawful permanent resident.

    The #states' case is back in Sorokin's courtroom so he can assess the impact of #SCOTUS’ *landmark* [insane] June 27th decision.

    #law #Constitution #NationwideInjunctions

  23. #Trump’s EO directs US agencies to refuse to recognize the #citizenship of children born in the #US after Feb 19 if neither their mother nor father is a US #citizen or lawful permanent resident.

    The #states' case is back in Sorokin's courtroom so he can assess the impact of #SCOTUS’ *landmark* [insane] June 27th decision.

    #law #Constitution #NationwideInjunctions

  24. #Trump’s EO directs US agencies to refuse to recognize the #citizenship of children born in the #US after Feb 19 if neither their mother nor father is a US #citizen or lawful permanent resident.

    The #states' case is back in Sorokin's courtroom so he can assess the impact of #SCOTUS’ *landmark* [insane] June 27th decision.

    #law #Constitution #NationwideInjunctions

  25. #Trump’s EO directs US agencies to refuse to recognize the #citizenship of children born in the #US after Feb 19 if neither their mother nor father is a US #citizen or lawful permanent resident.

    The #states' case is back in Sorokin's courtroom so he can assess the impact of #SCOTUS’ *landmark* [insane] June 27th decision.

    #law #Constitution #NationwideInjunctions

  26. The #DOJ has argued that #Trump's order conforms with the #Constitution & has asked Laplante to find that the plaintiffs cannot sue as a #class.

    #SCOTUS’ ruling did not address the legal merits of Trump's order, which the Republican president issued as part of his hardline #immigration agenda on his first day back in office in January.

    #law #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  27. The #DOJ has argued that #Trump's order conforms with the #Constitution & has asked Laplante to find that the plaintiffs cannot sue as a #class.

    #SCOTUS’ ruling did not address the legal merits of Trump's order, which the Republican president issued as part of his hardline #immigration agenda on his first day back in office in January.

    #law #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  28. The #DOJ has argued that #Trump's order conforms with the #Constitution & has asked Laplante to find that the plaintiffs cannot sue as a #class.

    #SCOTUS’ ruling did not address the legal merits of Trump's order, which the Republican president issued as part of his hardline #immigration agenda on his first day back in office in January.

    #law #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  29. The #DOJ has argued that #Trump's order conforms with the #Constitution & has asked Laplante to find that the plaintiffs cannot sue as a #class.

    #SCOTUS’ ruling did not address the legal merits of Trump's order, which the Republican president issued as part of his hardline #immigration agenda on his first day back in office in January.

    #law #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  30. The #DOJ has argued that #Trump's order conforms with the #Constitution & has asked Laplante to find that the plaintiffs cannot sue as a #class.

    #SCOTUS’ ruling did not address the legal merits of Trump's order, which the Republican president issued as part of his hardline #immigration agenda on his first day back in office in January.

    #law #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  31. The 3 judges who issued #NationwideInjunctions found that #Trump's directive likely violates #citizenship language in the US #Constitution's #14thAmendment. The amendment states that all "persons born or naturalized in the United States, & subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States & of the state wherein they reside."

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #immigration #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  32. The 3 judges who issued #NationwideInjunctions found that #Trump's directive likely violates #citizenship language in the US #Constitution's #14thAmendment. The amendment states that all "persons born or naturalized in the United States, & subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States & of the state wherein they reside."

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #immigration #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  33. The 3 judges who issued #NationwideInjunctions found that #Trump's directive likely violates #citizenship language in the US #Constitution's #14thAmendment. The amendment states that all "persons born or naturalized in the United States, & subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States & of the state wherein they reside."

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #immigration #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  34. The 3 judges who issued #NationwideInjunctions found that #Trump's directive likely violates #citizenship language in the US #Constitution's #14thAmendment. The amendment states that all "persons born or naturalized in the United States, & subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States & of the state wherein they reside."

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #immigration #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  35. The 3 judges who issued #NationwideInjunctions found that #Trump's directive likely violates #citizenship language in the US #Constitution's #14thAmendment. The amendment states that all "persons born or naturalized in the United States, & subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States & of the state wherein they reside."

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #immigration #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  36. Under #SCOTUS’ decision, Trump's #ExecutiveOrder would take effect on July 27.

    Looking to seize upon an exception in the Supreme Court's ruling, the lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that the decision allows #judges to continue to block #Trump policies on a nationwide basis in #ClassAction lawsuits.

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #immigration #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  37. Under #SCOTUS’ decision, Trump's #ExecutiveOrder would take effect on July 27.

    Looking to seize upon an exception in the Supreme Court's ruling, the lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that the decision allows #judges to continue to block #Trump policies on a nationwide basis in #ClassAction lawsuits.

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #immigration #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  38. Under #SCOTUS’ decision, Trump's #ExecutiveOrder would take effect on July 27.

    Looking to seize upon an exception in the Supreme Court's ruling, the lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that the decision allows #judges to continue to block #Trump policies on a nationwide basis in #ClassAction lawsuits.

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #immigration #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  39. Under #SCOTUS’ decision, Trump's #ExecutiveOrder would take effect on July 27.

    Looking to seize upon an exception in the Supreme Court's ruling, the lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that the decision allows #judges to continue to block #Trump policies on a nationwide basis in #ClassAction lawsuits.

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #immigration #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  40. Under #SCOTUS’ decision, Trump's #ExecutiveOrder would take effect on July 27.

    Looking to seize upon an exception in the Supreme Court's ruling, the lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that the decision allows #judges to continue to block #Trump policies on a nationwide basis in #ClassAction lawsuits.

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #immigration #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  41. The judge said he would stay his ruling for a few days to allow the #Trump admin to appeal & would issue a written decision by the end of the day.

    The #ACLU & others filed the suit just hours after #SCOTUS on June 27 issued a 6-3 ruling, by its conservative majority, that narrowed 3 #NationwideInjunctions issued by #judges in separate challenges to Trump's directive. The suit was filed on behalf of non-US citizens living in the #UnitedStates whose babies might be affected.

    #law #judiciary

  42. The judge said he would stay his ruling for a few days to allow the #Trump admin to appeal & would issue a written decision by the end of the day.

    The #ACLU & others filed the suit just hours after #SCOTUS on June 27 issued a 6-3 ruling, by its conservative majority, that narrowed 3 #NationwideInjunctions issued by #judges in separate challenges to Trump's directive. The suit was filed on behalf of non-US citizens living in the #UnitedStates whose babies might be affected.

    #law #judiciary

  43. The judge said he would stay his ruling for a few days to allow the #Trump admin to appeal & would issue a written decision by the end of the day.

    The #ACLU & others filed the suit just hours after #SCOTUS on June 27 issued a 6-3 ruling, by its conservative majority, that narrowed 3 #NationwideInjunctions issued by #judges in separate challenges to Trump's directive. The suit was filed on behalf of non-US citizens living in the #UnitedStates whose babies might be affected.

    #law #judiciary

  44. The judge said he would stay his ruling for a few days to allow the #Trump admin to appeal & would issue a written decision by the end of the day.

    The #ACLU & others filed the suit just hours after #SCOTUS on June 27 issued a 6-3 ruling, by its conservative majority, that narrowed 3 #NationwideInjunctions issued by #judges in separate challenges to Trump's directive. The suit was filed on behalf of non-US citizens living in the #UnitedStates whose babies might be affected.

    #law #judiciary

  45. The judge said he would stay his ruling for a few days to allow the #Trump admin to appeal & would issue a written decision by the end of the day.

    The #ACLU & others filed the suit just hours after #SCOTUS on June 27 issued a 6-3 ruling, by its conservative majority, that narrowed 3 #NationwideInjunctions issued by #judges in separate challenges to Trump's directive. The suit was filed on behalf of non-US citizens living in the #UnitedStates whose babies might be affected.

    #law #judiciary

  46. U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante in Concord, New Hampshire, made the ruling after #ImmigrantRights advocates implored him to grant #ClassAction status to a lawsuit they filed seeking to represent any babies whose #citizenship status would be threatened by implementation of #Trump's directive.

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #immigration #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  47. U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante in Concord, New Hampshire, made the ruling after #ImmigrantRights advocates implored him to grant #ClassAction status to a lawsuit they filed seeking to represent any babies whose #citizenship status would be threatened by implementation of #Trump's directive.

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #immigration #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  48. U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante in Concord, New Hampshire, made the ruling after #ImmigrantRights advocates implored him to grant #ClassAction status to a lawsuit they filed seeking to represent any babies whose #citizenship status would be threatened by implementation of #Trump's directive.

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #immigration #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  49. U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante in Concord, New Hampshire, made the ruling after #ImmigrantRights advocates implored him to grant #ClassAction status to a lawsuit they filed seeking to represent any babies whose #citizenship status would be threatened by implementation of #Trump's directive.

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #immigration #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower

  50. U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante in Concord, New Hampshire, made the ruling after #ImmigrantRights advocates implored him to grant #ClassAction status to a lawsuit they filed seeking to represent any babies whose #citizenship status would be threatened by implementation of #Trump's directive.

    #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #immigration #Constitution #Judiciary #AbuseOfPower