#critical-thinking — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #critical-thinking, aggregated by home.social.
-
The future isn't about using AI.
It's about knowing when not to trust it.
Every answer deserves one simple habit:
✅ Verify.
✅ Cross-check.
✅ Think critically.That's real AI literacy.
-
🎉 Ah, the timeless advice of 2009: Never challenge your overlord, lest you win and still lose! 😏 Because nothing says "righteous" IT crusade like meek #compliance and passive-aggressive submission. Who needs critical thinking when you can just nod along and avoid a corporate spanking? 🙄
https://righteousit.com/2009/03/12/never-argue-with-your-boss/ #timelessadvice #corporateculture #criticalthinking #ITcrusade #passiveaggressive #HackerNews #ngated -
🎉 Ah, the timeless advice of 2009: Never challenge your overlord, lest you win and still lose! 😏 Because nothing says "righteous" IT crusade like meek #compliance and passive-aggressive submission. Who needs critical thinking when you can just nod along and avoid a corporate spanking? 🙄
https://righteousit.com/2009/03/12/never-argue-with-your-boss/ #timelessadvice #corporateculture #criticalthinking #ITcrusade #passiveaggressive #HackerNews #ngated -
🎉 Ah, the timeless advice of 2009: Never challenge your overlord, lest you win and still lose! 😏 Because nothing says "righteous" IT crusade like meek #compliance and passive-aggressive submission. Who needs critical thinking when you can just nod along and avoid a corporate spanking? 🙄
https://righteousit.com/2009/03/12/never-argue-with-your-boss/ #timelessadvice #corporateculture #criticalthinking #ITcrusade #passiveaggressive #HackerNews #ngated -
🎉 Ah, the timeless advice of 2009: Never challenge your overlord, lest you win and still lose! 😏 Because nothing says "righteous" IT crusade like meek #compliance and passive-aggressive submission. Who needs critical thinking when you can just nod along and avoid a corporate spanking? 🙄
https://righteousit.com/2009/03/12/never-argue-with-your-boss/ #timelessadvice #corporateculture #criticalthinking #ITcrusade #passiveaggressive #HackerNews #ngated -
🎉 Ah, the timeless advice of 2009: Never challenge your overlord, lest you win and still lose! 😏 Because nothing says "righteous" IT crusade like meek #compliance and passive-aggressive submission. Who needs critical thinking when you can just nod along and avoid a corporate spanking? 🙄
https://righteousit.com/2009/03/12/never-argue-with-your-boss/ #timelessadvice #corporateculture #criticalthinking #ITcrusade #passiveaggressive #HackerNews #ngated -
How To Grow Old: Bertrand Russell on What Makes a Fulfilling Life
“If you can fall in love again and again,” Henry Miller wrote as he contemplated the measure of a life well lived on the precipice of turning eighty, “if you can forgive as well as forget, if you can keep from growing sour, surly, bitter and cynical… you’ve got it half licked.” Seven years earlier, the great British philosopher, mathematician, historian, and Nobel laureate Bertrand Russell (May 18, 1872–February 2, 1970) considered the same abiding question at the same […] -
How To Grow Old: Bertrand Russell on What Makes a Fulfilling Life
“If you can fall in love again and again,” Henry Miller wrote as he contemplated the measure of a life well lived on the precipice of turning eighty, “if you can forgive as well as forget, if you can keep from growing sour, surly, bitter and cynical… you’ve got it half licked.” Seven years earlier, the great British philosopher, mathematician, historian, and Nobel laureate Bertrand Russell (May 18, 1872–February 2, 1970) considered the same abiding question at the same […] -
How To Grow Old: Bertrand Russell on What Makes a Fulfilling Life
“If you can fall in love again and again,” Henry Miller wrote as he contemplated the measure of a life well lived on the precipice of turning eighty, “if you can forgive as well as forget, if you can keep from growing sour, surly, bitter and cynical… you’ve got it half licked.” Seven years earlier, the great British philosopher, mathematician, historian, and Nobel laureate Bertrand Russell (May 18, 1872–February 2, 1970) considered the same abiding question at the same […] -
How To Grow Old: Bertrand Russell on What Makes a Fulfilling Life
“If you can fall in love again and again,” Henry Miller wrote as he contemplated the measure of a life well lived on the precipice of turning eighty, “if you can forgive as well as forget, if you can keep from growing sour, surly, bitter and cynical… you’ve got it half licked.” Seven years earlier, the great British philosopher, mathematician, historian, and Nobel laureate Bertrand Russell (May 18, 1872–February 2, 1970) considered the same abiding question at the same […] -
How To Grow Old: Bertrand Russell on What Makes a Fulfilling Life
“If you can fall in love again and again,” Henry Miller wrote as he contemplated the measure of a life well lived on the precipice of turning eighty, “if you can forgive as well as forget, if you can keep from growing sour, surly, bitter and cynical… you’ve got it half licked.” Seven years earlier, the great British philosopher, mathematician, historian, and Nobel laureate Bertrand Russell (May 18, 1872–February 2, 1970) considered the same abiding question at the same […] -
Schools are being rethought to better prepare students for complex futures, where knowledge alone is not enough.
New teaching practices aim to strengthen critical thinking and collective problem-solving.
-
Schools are being rethought to better prepare students for complex futures, where knowledge alone is not enough.
New teaching practices aim to strengthen critical thinking and collective problem-solving.
-
Schools are being rethought to better prepare students for complex futures, where knowledge alone is not enough.
New teaching practices aim to strengthen critical thinking and collective problem-solving.
-
Schools are being rethought to better prepare students for complex futures, where knowledge alone is not enough.
New teaching practices aim to strengthen critical thinking and collective problem-solving.
-
Always remember to ask your AI assistant "What do you think..." at some point during discussions. It is a great way to challenge assumptions and revisit your approach.
Keep in mind that AI assistants are designed to align with your goals by default. Asking an AI assistant what it thinks about something specific will help you challenge the current state of your project or discussion.
-
Always remember to ask your AI assistant "What do you think..." at some point during discussions. It is a great way to challenge assumptions and revisit your approach.
Keep in mind that AI assistants are designed to align with your goals by default. Asking an AI assistant what it thinks about something specific will help you challenge the current state of your project or discussion.
-
Always remember to ask your AI assistant "What do you think..." at some point during discussions. It is a great way to challenge assumptions and revisit your approach.
Keep in mind that AI assistants are designed to align with your goals by default. Asking an AI assistant what it thinks about something specific will help you challenge the current state of your project or discussion.
-
Help me get my feet back on the ground #criticalthinking #psychology #philosophy
-
Help me get my feet back on the ground #criticalthinking #psychology #philosophy
-
Help me get my feet back on the ground #criticalthinking #psychology #philosophy
-
Help me get my feet back on the ground #criticalthinking #psychology #philosophy
-
Help me get my feet back on the ground #criticalthinking #psychology #philosophy
-
You emerged from another human body. You're made of stardust. You're related to your lawn. None of this registers as remarkable. Dale McGowan wants to know why.
https://onlys.ky/there-is-no-normal/?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=evergreen
#Philosophy #Humanism #CriticalThinking #Science #MeaningAndPurpose
-
You emerged from another human body. You're made of stardust. You're related to your lawn. None of this registers as remarkable. Dale McGowan wants to know why.
https://onlys.ky/there-is-no-normal/?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=evergreen
#Philosophy #Humanism #CriticalThinking #Science #MeaningAndPurpose
-
You emerged from another human body. You're made of stardust. You're related to your lawn. None of this registers as remarkable. Dale McGowan wants to know why.
https://onlys.ky/there-is-no-normal/?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=evergreen
#Philosophy #Humanism #CriticalThinking #Science #MeaningAndPurpose
-
You emerged from another human body. You're made of stardust. You're related to your lawn. None of this registers as remarkable. Dale McGowan wants to know why.
https://onlys.ky/there-is-no-normal/?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=evergreen
#Philosophy #Humanism #CriticalThinking #Science #MeaningAndPurpose
-
You emerged from another human body. You're made of stardust. You're related to your lawn. None of this registers as remarkable. Dale McGowan wants to know why.
https://onlys.ky/there-is-no-normal/?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=evergreen
#Philosophy #Humanism #CriticalThinking #Science #MeaningAndPurpose
-
Think of it this way: following every step can still lead to failure. A bold choice can lead to success.
#PersonalJudgment #CriticalThinking #quotes
https://quotes.thisgrandpablogs.com/initiative-and-judgment-over-organization/ -
"Even more fundamentally, the activities of reading and writing may themselves be understood as practices of living up to one another. When I write philosophy, I do not take myself to be merely informing you, the reader, of some Points, which are detached from me. Rather, my words are mine, and I assume responsibility for them. I take this to be the essence of our mutual contract, as reader and writer: I may expect your attention on what I write, only if I accept accountability for what I write and so, how I write. Rorty’s metaphor of conversation is especially apt in this respect. My part in our philosophical conversation cannot be efficiently outsourced, because doing so would undercut the basic ethical premise of being in conversation: that I show up, not in the sense of merely being physically present or nominally on the page, but in the distinctively normative sense of bringing myself fully to conversation and assuming responsibility for what I do in it. I offload what I think and what I say, then, at the risk of defeating my desire to really be in conversation with you: to hear what you say and respond, with my thoughts in my words, in turn."
https://blnreview.de/en/ausgaben/2026-08/als-ob-philosophieren-lily-hu
-
"Even more fundamentally, the activities of reading and writing may themselves be understood as practices of living up to one another. When I write philosophy, I do not take myself to be merely informing you, the reader, of some Points, which are detached from me. Rather, my words are mine, and I assume responsibility for them. I take this to be the essence of our mutual contract, as reader and writer: I may expect your attention on what I write, only if I accept accountability for what I write and so, how I write. Rorty’s metaphor of conversation is especially apt in this respect. My part in our philosophical conversation cannot be efficiently outsourced, because doing so would undercut the basic ethical premise of being in conversation: that I show up, not in the sense of merely being physically present or nominally on the page, but in the distinctively normative sense of bringing myself fully to conversation and assuming responsibility for what I do in it. I offload what I think and what I say, then, at the risk of defeating my desire to really be in conversation with you: to hear what you say and respond, with my thoughts in my words, in turn."
https://blnreview.de/en/ausgaben/2026-08/als-ob-philosophieren-lily-hu
-
"Even more fundamentally, the activities of reading and writing may themselves be understood as practices of living up to one another. When I write philosophy, I do not take myself to be merely informing you, the reader, of some Points, which are detached from me. Rather, my words are mine, and I assume responsibility for them. I take this to be the essence of our mutual contract, as reader and writer: I may expect your attention on what I write, only if I accept accountability for what I write and so, how I write. Rorty’s metaphor of conversation is especially apt in this respect. My part in our philosophical conversation cannot be efficiently outsourced, because doing so would undercut the basic ethical premise of being in conversation: that I show up, not in the sense of merely being physically present or nominally on the page, but in the distinctively normative sense of bringing myself fully to conversation and assuming responsibility for what I do in it. I offload what I think and what I say, then, at the risk of defeating my desire to really be in conversation with you: to hear what you say and respond, with my thoughts in my words, in turn."
https://blnreview.de/en/ausgaben/2026-08/als-ob-philosophieren-lily-hu
-
"Even more fundamentally, the activities of reading and writing may themselves be understood as practices of living up to one another. When I write philosophy, I do not take myself to be merely informing you, the reader, of some Points, which are detached from me. Rather, my words are mine, and I assume responsibility for them. I take this to be the essence of our mutual contract, as reader and writer: I may expect your attention on what I write, only if I accept accountability for what I write and so, how I write. Rorty’s metaphor of conversation is especially apt in this respect. My part in our philosophical conversation cannot be efficiently outsourced, because doing so would undercut the basic ethical premise of being in conversation: that I show up, not in the sense of merely being physically present or nominally on the page, but in the distinctively normative sense of bringing myself fully to conversation and assuming responsibility for what I do in it. I offload what I think and what I say, then, at the risk of defeating my desire to really be in conversation with you: to hear what you say and respond, with my thoughts in my words, in turn."
https://blnreview.de/en/ausgaben/2026-08/als-ob-philosophieren-lily-hu
-
"Even more fundamentally, the activities of reading and writing may themselves be understood as practices of living up to one another. When I write philosophy, I do not take myself to be merely informing you, the reader, of some Points, which are detached from me. Rather, my words are mine, and I assume responsibility for them. I take this to be the essence of our mutual contract, as reader and writer: I may expect your attention on what I write, only if I accept accountability for what I write and so, how I write. Rorty’s metaphor of conversation is especially apt in this respect. My part in our philosophical conversation cannot be efficiently outsourced, because doing so would undercut the basic ethical premise of being in conversation: that I show up, not in the sense of merely being physically present or nominally on the page, but in the distinctively normative sense of bringing myself fully to conversation and assuming responsibility for what I do in it. I offload what I think and what I say, then, at the risk of defeating my desire to really be in conversation with you: to hear what you say and respond, with my thoughts in my words, in turn."
https://blnreview.de/en/ausgaben/2026-08/als-ob-philosophieren-lily-hu
-
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
If Acts Happened Today, Would We Call It Communism?
For many, "communism" has become less a political philosophy and more a conversation stopper. But is every effort to use our shared resources to care for the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable really communism? This article examines the difference between political labels and biblical principles, comparing the teachings of the early Church with today's political rhetoric. -
@joeinwynnewood Not *total* lack of intelligence, but lacking in key aspects; #CriticalThinking.
