#ideas — Public Fediverse posts

A quotation from Eric Hoffer

The truth seems to be that propaganda on its own cannot force its way into unwilling minds; neither can it inculcate something wholly new; nor can it keep people persuaded once they have ceased to believe. It penetrates only into minds already open, and rather than instill opinion it articulates and justifies opinions already present in the minds of its recipients. The gifted propagandist brings to a boil ideas and passions already simmering in the minds of his hearers. he echoes their innermost feelings. Where opinion is not coerced, people can be made to believe only in what they already “know.”

Eric Hoffer (1902-1983) American writer, philosopher, longshoreman
True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements, Part 3, ch. 14, § 83 (3.14.83) (1951)

More about this quote: wist.info/hoffer-eric/11263/

#quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #erichoffer #agitprop #belief #confirmation #confirmationbias #conviction #disinformation #fear #ideas #justification #opinion #passion #predisposition #prejudice #propaganda #reinforcement #truebeliever

#lispector #citas #ideas #pensamiento #ahora

Amsterdam Canal Houses LEGO® Set - Now Official After 10K Votes
LEGO® officially accepts Amsterdam Canal Houses Ideas project! Five Dutch buildings, 2,600+ pieces, eight minifigures, and authentic canal charm coming soon.
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/amsterdam-canal-houses-five-dutch-dreams-in-one-brilliant-legor-ideas-set?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-919
#LEGO #Architecture #Ideas #Modular

LEGO Builder Toolbox Ideas Set Could Perfect Building
The LEGO Builder Toolbox on Ideas features specialized tools like color samplers, SNOT rulers, and exclusive brick separators for serious builders.
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/legor-builder-toolbox-set-could-help-master-builders-perfect-their-techniques?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-820
#MOC #Ideas #CreatorExpert #Art

LEGO Builder Toolbox Ideas Set Could Perfect Building
The LEGO Builder Toolbox on Ideas features specialized tools like color samplers, SNOT rulers, and exclusive brick separators for serious builders.
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/legor-builder-toolbox-set-could-help-master-builders-perfect-their-techniques?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-820
#MOC #Ideas #CreatorExpert #Art

LEGO Builder Toolbox Ideas Set Could Perfect Building
The LEGO Builder Toolbox on Ideas features specialized tools like color samplers, SNOT rulers, and exclusive brick separators for serious builders.
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/legor-builder-toolbox-set-could-help-master-builders-perfect-their-techniques?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-820
#MOC #Ideas #CreatorExpert #Art

LEGO Builder Toolbox Ideas Set Could Perfect Building
The LEGO Builder Toolbox on Ideas features specialized tools like color samplers, SNOT rulers, and exclusive brick separators for serious builders.
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/legor-builder-toolbox-set-could-help-master-builders-perfect-their-techniques?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-820
#MOC #Ideas #CreatorExpert #Art

LEGO Builder Toolbox Ideas Set Could Perfect Building
The LEGO Builder Toolbox on Ideas features specialized tools like color samplers, SNOT rulers, and exclusive brick separators for serious builders.
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/legor-builder-toolbox-set-could-help-master-builders-perfect-their-techniques?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-820
#MOC #Ideas #CreatorExpert #Art

Why Critical Thinking Is Disappearing – The Rise of Collective Stupidity
https://youtube.com/watch?v=rIO4IDMnBDU&si=O_mMnJ-WX5fWpO_a
#criticalthinking #ideas #philosophyofmind #philosophy #reading #education #thinkers #plato #thinkingfastandslow #kant #rousseau #cixous #debeauvoir

💁🏻‍♀️ ICYMI: 🌋🔥 Lava can reach 1,200° C – that's more than four times hotter than the max temperature of a standard kitchen oven.

Since #lava is as heavy and dense as the #rocks it's composed of, its flow is almost unstoppable. Volcanologist Arianna Soldati shares some of the #solutions attempted in #Hawaii, #Iceland, and #Italy to redirect the slow-moving flows.

👉 Learn more: https://seethis.tv/post/is-it-possible-to-stop-lava-ted-ed

#20thcentury #animation #history #ideas #magma #sicily #volcanoes #volcanology #geology #science #earth #nature #education #tksst #video

LEGO Muppet Theatre Ideas Project Hits 10K Supporters
LEE40s redesigned Muppet Theatre LEGO Ideas project reaches 10,000 supporters with a complete 4,000-piece modular playset featuring interchangeable scenes.
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/lego-muppet-theatre-ideas-project-reaches-10000-supporters-with-complete-redesign?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-769
#Minifigures #Ideas #Modular #CreatorExpert

Mahna Mahna LEGO Ideas Set Hits 10K, Enters Review
The Mahna Mahna LEGO Ideas project reaches 10,000 supporters and enters review stage, featuring Muppet Show characters and proposed sound brick.
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/mahna-mahna-lego-ideas-set-reaches-10000-supporters-enters-review-stage?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-763
#Ideas #LEGOIDEAS #Nostalgia #Muppets

🌋🔥 Lava can reach 1,200° C – that's more than four times hotter than the max temperature of a standard kitchen oven.

Since #lava is as heavy and dense as the #rocks it's composed of, its flow is almost unstoppable. Volcanologist Arianna Soldati shares some of the #solutions attempted in #Hawaii, #Iceland, and #Italy to redirect the slow-moving flows.

👉 Learn more: https://seethis.tv/post/is-it-possible-to-stop-lava-ted-ed

#20thcentury #animation #history #ideas #magma #sicily #volcanoes #volcanology #geology #science #earth #nature #education #tksst #video

#341: How Radical Should You Be In Your Belief?

https://youtu.be/mOoLMJQRrQY

How radical should you be in your belief? If you believe in something, shouldn’t you aim to believe in it more? So, let’s discuss.

All of us have our ideas that we prefer over others. All of us may have our political, religious, cultural preferences. There’s nothing wrong with that. That’s what we do. That’s what makes us human.

If we believe deeply that something is correct, that something is good, should we not think also that more of that is better? It’s a seductive idea and it seems logical initially. If you are X, if you believe in X, shouldn’t you believe in it more so? That seems to be the case because otherwise why would you believe in it? Is your belief really that weak that you can’t strengthen it?

So that’s the idea. And if you for some reason don’t want to fully commit, maybe you really never believed it completely. Maybe you’re not really a true believer. That’s the other part of the idea.

However, I would say this ignores certain facts about ideas, because every idea — whether it’s a religion, a philosophy, a cultural preference — typically has safeguards. When you look at all the big religions, they have some sort of clause, some sort of warning against taking it too far. Because that’s what the very idea of divinity is. That’s what the very idea of God is: that which we as human beings cannot completely understand. God is that which we cannot even approach so much that we can be certain of what God is. Because if we could, wouldn’t that mean in some way that we could become God? And that’s the very warning that most religions promote.

Believe, but don’t assume for a moment that you have all the answers.

There’s this joke that camels always look at humans in a specific way. The joke is that God has 100 names. We know 99 of them. But the camel knows all 100. And that’s why the camel looks so superior.

But that is the idea of religion. The idea of religion is a combination — as strange as this may sound — of belief and humility. We are not God. We are not everything in the universe. We are not all-knowing. We are not omnipotent. And we will never get there. So whatever you think of as God — whether you think that’s a religious idea, whether you think that’s nature, whether you think that’s the universe, whether you think that’s just the ultimate good — this idea is clear: do not pretend to be all-knowing yourself. Have some sense of humility.

Now that also goes for philosophy. You may say, I follow philosopher so-and-so. But philosophy is an ongoing conversation about wisdom — the love of wisdom; that’s what philosophia means. Each idea in philosophy lives in interaction with other ideas. Philosophy is more than just footnotes to Plato. Plato can be footnotes to Plato — if you look at the Laws and the Republic, there are two very different ideas there, and more than two.

Philosophers are typically smarter than those who follow a specific philosophy. Because every philosopher knows that in order to put out the strongest version of their idea, they have to leave some of the complications out. But there are always complications. And philosophy X always lives in some form of exchange with philosophy Y or Z or however many there are. Every idea lives in an ecosystem of ideas. It lives in relation with others.

Philosophy X may be good or better in certain respects than philosophy Y. Maybe philosophy Y is good in other aspects. But the truth emerges in the interaction between the two.

So you may believe that the individual is the source of all morality. But how far do you want to take this? Do you believe this to the complete abdication of responsibility for others? Do you believe this to the complete rejection of the state? Similarly, if you believe the state is the authority over everything else, at which point does this have to stop? At which point does the state have to even question itself as to how far it should go?

Everything costs money. Does this mean that everything should be judged by its price tag? Even though price is not a static thing — it depends on a lot of factors. Is the price tag always the value of something, or is it just our momentary expression of our social and cultural priorities? Of course there’s supply and demand which regulate that. But is that still everything? Aren’t there things where we should find some difficulty putting a price on? Aren’t there some things that we can’t really measure very well? So isn’t there a limit to this kind of positivist, materialist way of looking at things?

Equally, if we say the materialistic world doesn’t matter and we need to live in a more spiritual, contemplative state of mind — that may be true to a point, but eventually bills will have to be paid. You do live in some form of reality, and that reality means that resources typically are limited and there needs to be a prioritizing. How do you organize that?

The material and the spiritual belong together. They will always have friction between each other, but they will always complement each other. If you’re too materialistic — if you believe that only that which can be measured, only that which can be owned, only that which can have a price tag matters — you should maybe think about some more spiritual components of life. If you’re too spiritual, maybe you need to be rooted more in the fact that there’s also a materialist component of life.

If X drowns out Y, sides of X may appear that make it wrong, because you need that balance. And there are more than just two — X and Y is easier, but you could say XYZ or whatever.

So in fact the saying may be true that too much of a good thing is indeed not good. It distorts what it is.

This is why you see me frequently call for moderation. You could argue that too much moderation is also wrong — you need some passion and some intensity and some belief. Well, yes. But moderation can also be just a middle ground between these different poles. All these different ideas around us lead us to negotiate our space within them. Moderation does not mean you don’t have convictions. It means that you question at which point your convictions turn into such a radicality, into such an extreme version, that they become wrong — that they are undermined by their own conviction.

Is radicality the truest expression of an idea? No. It may be the most flamboyant, the most interesting. But it can’t survive well. If you turn too radical, too extremist, your idea may be more attractive to people who really think like you. But then look at history. Every time an idea became too radical, it fails. It has failed. No matter what the idea — because in its radicality, in its extremism, it loses its power of conviction towards those who don’t agree with you. And the number of people in the world who agree with you is always going to be punctuated by the number of people who disagree with you.

If you want to build a successful movement, if you want to build a successful approach to politics, to religion, to whatever your cultural or social idea may be, you need to convince others. You need to find ways of integrating aspects of the other into your own.

Which is why this very familiar symbol of yin and yang — masculine, feminine, black, white, dark, light — shows you these two parts, but there’s always something of the other in the bigger part. You know the symbol.

If we don’t find a way to integrate that with which we disagree — as some sense of doubt, as some sense of humility within our convictions — then our convictions will be nothing but arrogance, nothing but self-congratulatory pose, and turn out to be nothing else than solipsism: centering on yourself and that which you think defines you as the only thing that matters.

[This was originally posted to YouTube as a video. This post is a slightly abbreviated transcript, preserving the oral style of the video.]

#341: How Radical Should You Be In Your Belief?

https://youtu.be/mOoLMJQRrQY

How radical should you be in your belief? If you believe in something, shouldn’t you aim to believe in it more? So, let’s discuss.

All of us have our ideas that we prefer over others. All of us may have our political, religious, cultural preferences. There’s nothing wrong with that. That’s what we do. That’s what makes us human.

If we believe deeply that something is correct, that something is good, should we not think also that more of that is better? It’s a seductive idea and it seems logical initially. If you are X, if you believe in X, shouldn’t you believe in it more so? That seems to be the case because otherwise why would you believe in it? Is your belief really that weak that you can’t strengthen it?

So that’s the idea. And if you for some reason don’t want to fully commit, maybe you really never believed it completely. Maybe you’re not really a true believer. That’s the other part of the idea.

However, I would say this ignores certain facts about ideas, because every idea — whether it’s a religion, a philosophy, a cultural preference — typically has safeguards. When you look at all the big religions, they have some sort of clause, some sort of warning against taking it too far. Because that’s what the very idea of divinity is. That’s what the very idea of God is: that which we as human beings cannot completely understand. God is that which we cannot even approach so much that we can be certain of what God is. Because if we could, wouldn’t that mean in some way that we could become God? And that’s the very warning that most religions promote.

Believe, but don’t assume for a moment that you have all the answers.

There’s this joke that camels always look at humans in a specific way. The joke is that God has 100 names. We know 99 of them. But the camel knows all 100. And that’s why the camel looks so superior.

But that is the idea of religion. The idea of religion is a combination — as strange as this may sound — of belief and humility. We are not God. We are not everything in the universe. We are not all-knowing. We are not omnipotent. And we will never get there. So whatever you think of as God — whether you think that’s a religious idea, whether you think that’s nature, whether you think that’s the universe, whether you think that’s just the ultimate good — this idea is clear: do not pretend to be all-knowing yourself. Have some sense of humility.

Now that also goes for philosophy. You may say, I follow philosopher so-and-so. But philosophy is an ongoing conversation about wisdom — the love of wisdom; that’s what philosophia means. Each idea in philosophy lives in interaction with other ideas. Philosophy is more than just footnotes to Plato. Plato can be footnotes to Plato — if you look at the Laws and the Republic, there are two very different ideas there, and more than two.

Philosophers are typically smarter than those who follow a specific philosophy. Because every philosopher knows that in order to put out the strongest version of their idea, they have to leave some of the complications out. But there are always complications. And philosophy X always lives in some form of exchange with philosophy Y or Z or however many there are. Every idea lives in an ecosystem of ideas. It lives in relation with others.

Philosophy X may be good or better in certain respects than philosophy Y. Maybe philosophy Y is good in other aspects. But the truth emerges in the interaction between the two.

So you may believe that the individual is the source of all morality. But how far do you want to take this? Do you believe this to the complete abdication of responsibility for others? Do you believe this to the complete rejection of the state? Similarly, if you believe the state is the authority over everything else, at which point does this have to stop? At which point does the state have to even question itself as to how far it should go?

Everything costs money. Does this mean that everything should be judged by its price tag? Even though price is not a static thing — it depends on a lot of factors. Is the price tag always the value of something, or is it just our momentary expression of our social and cultural priorities? Of course there’s supply and demand which regulate that. But is that still everything? Aren’t there things where we should find some difficulty putting a price on? Aren’t there some things that we can’t really measure very well? So isn’t there a limit to this kind of positivist, materialist way of looking at things?

Equally, if we say the materialistic world doesn’t matter and we need to live in a more spiritual, contemplative state of mind — that may be true to a point, but eventually bills will have to be paid. You do live in some form of reality, and that reality means that resources typically are limited and there needs to be a prioritizing. How do you organize that?

The material and the spiritual belong together. They will always have friction between each other, but they will always complement each other. If you’re too materialistic — if you believe that only that which can be measured, only that which can be owned, only that which can have a price tag matters — you should maybe think about some more spiritual components of life. If you’re too spiritual, maybe you need to be rooted more in the fact that there’s also a materialist component of life.

If X drowns out Y, sides of X may appear that make it wrong, because you need that balance. And there are more than just two — X and Y is easier, but you could say XYZ or whatever.

So in fact the saying may be true that too much of a good thing is indeed not good. It distorts what it is.

This is why you see me frequently call for moderation. You could argue that too much moderation is also wrong — you need some passion and some intensity and some belief. Well, yes. But moderation can also be just a middle ground between these different poles. All these different ideas around us lead us to negotiate our space within them. Moderation does not mean you don’t have convictions. It means that you question at which point your convictions turn into such a radicality, into such an extreme version, that they become wrong — that they are undermined by their own conviction.

Is radicality the truest expression of an idea? No. It may be the most flamboyant, the most interesting. But it can’t survive well. If you turn too radical, too extremist, your idea may be more attractive to people who really think like you. But then look at history. Every time an idea became too radical, it fails. It has failed. No matter what the idea — because in its radicality, in its extremism, it loses its power of conviction towards those who don’t agree with you. And the number of people in the world who agree with you is always going to be punctuated by the number of people who disagree with you.

If you want to build a successful movement, if you want to build a successful approach to politics, to religion, to whatever your cultural or social idea may be, you need to convince others. You need to find ways of integrating aspects of the other into your own.

Which is why this very familiar symbol of yin and yang — masculine, feminine, black, white, dark, light — shows you these two parts, but there’s always something of the other in the bigger part. You know the symbol.

If we don’t find a way to integrate that with which we disagree — as some sense of doubt, as some sense of humility within our convictions — then our convictions will be nothing but arrogance, nothing but self-congratulatory pose, and turn out to be nothing else than solipsism: centering on yourself and that which you think defines you as the only thing that matters.

[This was originally posted to YouTube as a video. This post is a slightly abbreviated transcript, preserving the oral style of the video.]

#341: How Radical Should You Be In Your Belief?

https://youtu.be/mOoLMJQRrQY

How radical should you be in your belief? If you believe in something, shouldn’t you aim to believe in it more? So, let’s discuss.

All of us have our ideas that we prefer over others. All of us may have our political, religious, cultural preferences. There’s nothing wrong with that. That’s what we do. That’s what makes us human.

If we believe deeply that something is correct, that something is good, should we not think also that more of that is better? It’s a seductive idea and it seems logical initially. If you are X, if you believe in X, shouldn’t you believe in it more so? That seems to be the case because otherwise why would you believe in it? Is your belief really that weak that you can’t strengthen it?

So that’s the idea. And if you for some reason don’t want to fully commit, maybe you really never believed it completely. Maybe you’re not really a true believer. That’s the other part of the idea.

However, I would say this ignores certain facts about ideas, because every idea — whether it’s a religion, a philosophy, a cultural preference — typically has safeguards. When you look at all the big religions, they have some sort of clause, some sort of warning against taking it too far. Because that’s what the very idea of divinity is. That’s what the very idea of God is: that which we as human beings cannot completely understand. God is that which we cannot even approach so much that we can be certain of what God is. Because if we could, wouldn’t that mean in some way that we could become God? And that’s the very warning that most religions promote.

Believe, but don’t assume for a moment that you have all the answers.

There’s this joke that camels always look at humans in a specific way. The joke is that God has 100 names. We know 99 of them. But the camel knows all 100. And that’s why the camel looks so superior.

But that is the idea of religion. The idea of religion is a combination — as strange as this may sound — of belief and humility. We are not God. We are not everything in the universe. We are not all-knowing. We are not omnipotent. And we will never get there. So whatever you think of as God — whether you think that’s a religious idea, whether you think that’s nature, whether you think that’s the universe, whether you think that’s just the ultimate good — this idea is clear: do not pretend to be all-knowing yourself. Have some sense of humility.

Now that also goes for philosophy. You may say, I follow philosopher so-and-so. But philosophy is an ongoing conversation about wisdom — the love of wisdom; that’s what philosophia means. Each idea in philosophy lives in interaction with other ideas. Philosophy is more than just footnotes to Plato. Plato can be footnotes to Plato — if you look at the Laws and the Republic, there are two very different ideas there, and more than two.

Philosophers are typically smarter than those who follow a specific philosophy. Because every philosopher knows that in order to put out the strongest version of their idea, they have to leave some of the complications out. But there are always complications. And philosophy X always lives in some form of exchange with philosophy Y or Z or however many there are. Every idea lives in an ecosystem of ideas. It lives in relation with others.

Philosophy X may be good or better in certain respects than philosophy Y. Maybe philosophy Y is good in other aspects. But the truth emerges in the interaction between the two.

So you may believe that the individual is the source of all morality. But how far do you want to take this? Do you believe this to the complete abdication of responsibility for others? Do you believe this to the complete rejection of the state? Similarly, if you believe the state is the authority over everything else, at which point does this have to stop? At which point does the state have to even question itself as to how far it should go?

Everything costs money. Does this mean that everything should be judged by its price tag? Even though price is not a static thing — it depends on a lot of factors. Is the price tag always the value of something, or is it just our momentary expression of our social and cultural priorities? Of course there’s supply and demand which regulate that. But is that still everything? Aren’t there things where we should find some difficulty putting a price on? Aren’t there some things that we can’t really measure very well? So isn’t there a limit to this kind of positivist, materialist way of looking at things?

Equally, if we say the materialistic world doesn’t matter and we need to live in a more spiritual, contemplative state of mind — that may be true to a point, but eventually bills will have to be paid. You do live in some form of reality, and that reality means that resources typically are limited and there needs to be a prioritizing. How do you organize that?

The material and the spiritual belong together. They will always have friction between each other, but they will always complement each other. If you’re too materialistic — if you believe that only that which can be measured, only that which can be owned, only that which can have a price tag matters — you should maybe think about some more spiritual components of life. If you’re too spiritual, maybe you need to be rooted more in the fact that there’s also a materialist component of life.

If X drowns out Y, sides of X may appear that make it wrong, because you need that balance. And there are more than just two — X and Y is easier, but you could say XYZ or whatever.

So in fact the saying may be true that too much of a good thing is indeed not good. It distorts what it is.

This is why you see me frequently call for moderation. You could argue that too much moderation is also wrong — you need some passion and some intensity and some belief. Well, yes. But moderation can also be just a middle ground between these different poles. All these different ideas around us lead us to negotiate our space within them. Moderation does not mean you don’t have convictions. It means that you question at which point your convictions turn into such a radicality, into such an extreme version, that they become wrong — that they are undermined by their own conviction.

Is radicality the truest expression of an idea? No. It may be the most flamboyant, the most interesting. But it can’t survive well. If you turn too radical, too extremist, your idea may be more attractive to people who really think like you. But then look at history. Every time an idea became too radical, it fails. It has failed. No matter what the idea — because in its radicality, in its extremism, it loses its power of conviction towards those who don’t agree with you. And the number of people in the world who agree with you is always going to be punctuated by the number of people who disagree with you.

If you want to build a successful movement, if you want to build a successful approach to politics, to religion, to whatever your cultural or social idea may be, you need to convince others. You need to find ways of integrating aspects of the other into your own.

Which is why this very familiar symbol of yin and yang — masculine, feminine, black, white, dark, light — shows you these two parts, but there’s always something of the other in the bigger part. You know the symbol.

If we don’t find a way to integrate that with which we disagree — as some sense of doubt, as some sense of humility within our convictions — then our convictions will be nothing but arrogance, nothing but self-congratulatory pose, and turn out to be nothing else than solipsism: centering on yourself and that which you think defines you as the only thing that matters.

[This was originally posted to YouTube as a video. This post is a slightly abbreviated transcript, preserving the oral style of the video.]

#341: How Radical Should You Be In Your Belief?

https://youtu.be/mOoLMJQRrQY

How radical should you be in your belief? If you believe in something, shouldn’t you aim to believe in it more? So, let’s discuss.

All of us have our ideas that we prefer over others. All of us may have our political, religious, cultural preferences. There’s nothing wrong with that. That’s what we do. That’s what makes us human.

If we believe deeply that something is correct, that something is good, should we not think also that more of that is better? It’s a seductive idea and it seems logical initially. If you are X, if you believe in X, shouldn’t you believe in it more so? That seems to be the case because otherwise why would you believe in it? Is your belief really that weak that you can’t strengthen it?

So that’s the idea. And if you for some reason don’t want to fully commit, maybe you really never believed it completely. Maybe you’re not really a true believer. That’s the other part of the idea.

However, I would say this ignores certain facts about ideas, because every idea — whether it’s a religion, a philosophy, a cultural preference — typically has safeguards. When you look at all the big religions, they have some sort of clause, some sort of warning against taking it too far. Because that’s what the very idea of divinity is. That’s what the very idea of God is: that which we as human beings cannot completely understand. God is that which we cannot even approach so much that we can be certain of what God is. Because if we could, wouldn’t that mean in some way that we could become God? And that’s the very warning that most religions promote.

Believe, but don’t assume for a moment that you have all the answers.

There’s this joke that camels always look at humans in a specific way. The joke is that God has 100 names. We know 99 of them. But the camel knows all 100. And that’s why the camel looks so superior.

But that is the idea of religion. The idea of religion is a combination — as strange as this may sound — of belief and humility. We are not God. We are not everything in the universe. We are not all-knowing. We are not omnipotent. And we will never get there. So whatever you think of as God — whether you think that’s a religious idea, whether you think that’s nature, whether you think that’s the universe, whether you think that’s just the ultimate good — this idea is clear: do not pretend to be all-knowing yourself. Have some sense of humility.

Now that also goes for philosophy. You may say, I follow philosopher so-and-so. But philosophy is an ongoing conversation about wisdom — the love of wisdom; that’s what philosophia means. Each idea in philosophy lives in interaction with other ideas. Philosophy is more than just footnotes to Plato. Plato can be footnotes to Plato — if you look at the Laws and the Republic, there are two very different ideas there, and more than two.

Philosophers are typically smarter than those who follow a specific philosophy. Because every philosopher knows that in order to put out the strongest version of their idea, they have to leave some of the complications out. But there are always complications. And philosophy X always lives in some form of exchange with philosophy Y or Z or however many there are. Every idea lives in an ecosystem of ideas. It lives in relation with others.

Philosophy X may be good or better in certain respects than philosophy Y. Maybe philosophy Y is good in other aspects. But the truth emerges in the interaction between the two.

So you may believe that the individual is the source of all morality. But how far do you want to take this? Do you believe this to the complete abdication of responsibility for others? Do you believe this to the complete rejection of the state? Similarly, if you believe the state is the authority over everything else, at which point does this have to stop? At which point does the state have to even question itself as to how far it should go?

Everything costs money. Does this mean that everything should be judged by its price tag? Even though price is not a static thing — it depends on a lot of factors. Is the price tag always the value of something, or is it just our momentary expression of our social and cultural priorities? Of course there’s supply and demand which regulate that. But is that still everything? Aren’t there things where we should find some difficulty putting a price on? Aren’t there some things that we can’t really measure very well? So isn’t there a limit to this kind of positivist, materialist way of looking at things?

Equally, if we say the materialistic world doesn’t matter and we need to live in a more spiritual, contemplative state of mind — that may be true to a point, but eventually bills will have to be paid. You do live in some form of reality, and that reality means that resources typically are limited and there needs to be a prioritizing. How do you organize that?

The material and the spiritual belong together. They will always have friction between each other, but they will always complement each other. If you’re too materialistic — if you believe that only that which can be measured, only that which can be owned, only that which can have a price tag matters — you should maybe think about some more spiritual components of life. If you’re too spiritual, maybe you need to be rooted more in the fact that there’s also a materialist component of life.

If X drowns out Y, sides of X may appear that make it wrong, because you need that balance. And there are more than just two — X and Y is easier, but you could say XYZ or whatever.

So in fact the saying may be true that too much of a good thing is indeed not good. It distorts what it is.

This is why you see me frequently call for moderation. You could argue that too much moderation is also wrong — you need some passion and some intensity and some belief. Well, yes. But moderation can also be just a middle ground between these different poles. All these different ideas around us lead us to negotiate our space within them. Moderation does not mean you don’t have convictions. It means that you question at which point your convictions turn into such a radicality, into such an extreme version, that they become wrong — that they are undermined by their own conviction.

Is radicality the truest expression of an idea? No. It may be the most flamboyant, the most interesting. But it can’t survive well. If you turn too radical, too extremist, your idea may be more attractive to people who really think like you. But then look at history. Every time an idea became too radical, it fails. It has failed. No matter what the idea — because in its radicality, in its extremism, it loses its power of conviction towards those who don’t agree with you. And the number of people in the world who agree with you is always going to be punctuated by the number of people who disagree with you.

If you want to build a successful movement, if you want to build a successful approach to politics, to religion, to whatever your cultural or social idea may be, you need to convince others. You need to find ways of integrating aspects of the other into your own.

Which is why this very familiar symbol of yin and yang — masculine, feminine, black, white, dark, light — shows you these two parts, but there’s always something of the other in the bigger part. You know the symbol.

If we don’t find a way to integrate that with which we disagree — as some sense of doubt, as some sense of humility within our convictions — then our convictions will be nothing but arrogance, nothing but self-congratulatory pose, and turn out to be nothing else than solipsism: centering on yourself and that which you think defines you as the only thing that matters.

[This was originally posted to YouTube as a video. This post is a slightly abbreviated transcript, preserving the oral style of the video.]

#341: How Radical Should You Be In Your Belief?

https://youtu.be/mOoLMJQRrQY

How radical should you be in your belief? If you believe in something, shouldn’t you aim to believe in it more? So, let’s discuss.

All of us have our ideas that we prefer over others. All of us may have our political, religious, cultural preferences. There’s nothing wrong with that. That’s what we do. That’s what makes us human.

If we believe deeply that something is correct, that something is good, should we not think also that more of that is better? It’s a seductive idea and it seems logical initially. If you are X, if you believe in X, shouldn’t you believe in it more so? That seems to be the case because otherwise why would you believe in it? Is your belief really that weak that you can’t strengthen it?

So that’s the idea. And if you for some reason don’t want to fully commit, maybe you really never believed it completely. Maybe you’re not really a true believer. That’s the other part of the idea.

However, I would say this ignores certain facts about ideas, because every idea — whether it’s a religion, a philosophy, a cultural preference — typically has safeguards. When you look at all the big religions, they have some sort of clause, some sort of warning against taking it too far. Because that’s what the very idea of divinity is. That’s what the very idea of God is: that which we as human beings cannot completely understand. God is that which we cannot even approach so much that we can be certain of what God is. Because if we could, wouldn’t that mean in some way that we could become God? And that’s the very warning that most religions promote.

Believe, but don’t assume for a moment that you have all the answers.

There’s this joke that camels always look at humans in a specific way. The joke is that God has 100 names. We know 99 of them. But the camel knows all 100. And that’s why the camel looks so superior.

But that is the idea of religion. The idea of religion is a combination — as strange as this may sound — of belief and humility. We are not God. We are not everything in the universe. We are not all-knowing. We are not omnipotent. And we will never get there. So whatever you think of as God — whether you think that’s a religious idea, whether you think that’s nature, whether you think that’s the universe, whether you think that’s just the ultimate good — this idea is clear: do not pretend to be all-knowing yourself. Have some sense of humility.

Now that also goes for philosophy. You may say, I follow philosopher so-and-so. But philosophy is an ongoing conversation about wisdom — the love of wisdom; that’s what philosophia means. Each idea in philosophy lives in interaction with other ideas. Philosophy is more than just footnotes to Plato. Plato can be footnotes to Plato — if you look at the Laws and the Republic, there are two very different ideas there, and more than two.

Philosophers are typically smarter than those who follow a specific philosophy. Because every philosopher knows that in order to put out the strongest version of their idea, they have to leave some of the complications out. But there are always complications. And philosophy X always lives in some form of exchange with philosophy Y or Z or however many there are. Every idea lives in an ecosystem of ideas. It lives in relation with others.

Philosophy X may be good or better in certain respects than philosophy Y. Maybe philosophy Y is good in other aspects. But the truth emerges in the interaction between the two.

So you may believe that the individual is the source of all morality. But how far do you want to take this? Do you believe this to the complete abdication of responsibility for others? Do you believe this to the complete rejection of the state? Similarly, if you believe the state is the authority over everything else, at which point does this have to stop? At which point does the state have to even question itself as to how far it should go?

Everything costs money. Does this mean that everything should be judged by its price tag? Even though price is not a static thing — it depends on a lot of factors. Is the price tag always the value of something, or is it just our momentary expression of our social and cultural priorities? Of course there’s supply and demand which regulate that. But is that still everything? Aren’t there things where we should find some difficulty putting a price on? Aren’t there some things that we can’t really measure very well? So isn’t there a limit to this kind of positivist, materialist way of looking at things?

Equally, if we say the materialistic world doesn’t matter and we need to live in a more spiritual, contemplative state of mind — that may be true to a point, but eventually bills will have to be paid. You do live in some form of reality, and that reality means that resources typically are limited and there needs to be a prioritizing. How do you organize that?

The material and the spiritual belong together. They will always have friction between each other, but they will always complement each other. If you’re too materialistic — if you believe that only that which can be measured, only that which can be owned, only that which can have a price tag matters — you should maybe think about some more spiritual components of life. If you’re too spiritual, maybe you need to be rooted more in the fact that there’s also a materialist component of life.

If X drowns out Y, sides of X may appear that make it wrong, because you need that balance. And there are more than just two — X and Y is easier, but you could say XYZ or whatever.

So in fact the saying may be true that too much of a good thing is indeed not good. It distorts what it is.

This is why you see me frequently call for moderation. You could argue that too much moderation is also wrong — you need some passion and some intensity and some belief. Well, yes. But moderation can also be just a middle ground between these different poles. All these different ideas around us lead us to negotiate our space within them. Moderation does not mean you don’t have convictions. It means that you question at which point your convictions turn into such a radicality, into such an extreme version, that they become wrong — that they are undermined by their own conviction.

Is radicality the truest expression of an idea? No. It may be the most flamboyant, the most interesting. But it can’t survive well. If you turn too radical, too extremist, your idea may be more attractive to people who really think like you. But then look at history. Every time an idea became too radical, it fails. It has failed. No matter what the idea — because in its radicality, in its extremism, it loses its power of conviction towards those who don’t agree with you. And the number of people in the world who agree with you is always going to be punctuated by the number of people who disagree with you.

If you want to build a successful movement, if you want to build a successful approach to politics, to religion, to whatever your cultural or social idea may be, you need to convince others. You need to find ways of integrating aspects of the other into your own.

Which is why this very familiar symbol of yin and yang — masculine, feminine, black, white, dark, light — shows you these two parts, but there’s always something of the other in the bigger part. You know the symbol.

If we don’t find a way to integrate that with which we disagree — as some sense of doubt, as some sense of humility within our convictions — then our convictions will be nothing but arrogance, nothing but self-congratulatory pose, and turn out to be nothing else than solipsism: centering on yourself and that which you think defines you as the only thing that matters.

[This was originally posted to YouTube as a video. This post is a slightly abbreviated transcript, preserving the oral style of the video.]

A quotation from Edward Morgan

A book is the only place I know in which you can examine a fragile thought without breaking it, or explore an explosive idea without fear that it will go off in your face. It is one of the few sources of information left that is served up without the silent black noise of a headline, the doomy hullabaloo of a commercial. It is one of the few havens remaining where a man’s mind can get both provocation and privacy.

Edward P. Morgan (1910-1993) American journalist
Essay (1955-08-15), “The Literary Bug Doesn’t Bite,” ABC Radio

More about this quote: wist.info/morgan-edward/72251/

#quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #edwardmorgan #edwardpmorgan #book #commercial #consideration #contemplation #ideas #literature #message #reading #solitude

#baudelaire #tiempo #citas #ideas #pensamiento

Beverly Hills 90210 Peach Pit LEGO Ideas Hits 2K Support
The nostalgic Beverly Hills 90210 Peach Pit LEGO Ideas project reaches 2K supporters. Will Dylan and the gang get their own official brick set?
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/lego-ideas-beverly-hills-90210-peach-pit-hits-151k-supporters-will-dylan-and-the-gang-get-their-own-set?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-795
#Minifigures #Ideas #Nostalgia #TVShows

LEGO Ideas Charmed Manor Hits 10K Support Milestone
The LEGO Ideas Charmed Halliwell Manor project reaches 10,000 supporters with 4,997 pieces, pull-out displays, and opening Book of Shadows.
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/legor-ideas-charmed-halliwell-manor-reaches-10k-supporters?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-803
#Architecture #Ideas #Modular #LEGO

All those Rich People lists are useless.

These lists unnecessarily inspire people to engage in a materialistic, cut-throat race for wealth.

Billionaires should give back to the countries in which they have acquired wealth. They should help solve human problems.

Instead, there should be a ranking of the most 'Philanthropic Billionaires'.

#quote #truth #philosophy #psychology #ideas #thought #politics #rich #Billionaire #wealth #finance #economy #money #inequality #TaxTheRich

All those Rich People lists are useless.

These lists unnecessarily inspire people to engage in a materialistic, cut-throat race for wealth.

Billionaires should give back to the countries in which they have acquired wealth. They should help solve human problems.

Instead, there should be a ranking of the most 'Philanthropic Billionaires'.

#quote #truth #philosophy #psychology #ideas #thought #politics #rich #Billionaire #wealth #finance #economy #money #inequality #TaxTheRich

All those Rich People lists are useless.

These lists unnecessarily inspire people to engage in a materialistic, cut-throat race for wealth.

Billionaires should give back to the countries in which they have acquired wealth. They should help solve human problems.

Instead, there should be a ranking of the most 'Philanthropic Billionaires'.

#quote #truth #philosophy #psychology #ideas #thought #politics #rich #Billionaire #wealth #finance #economy #money #inequality #TaxTheRich

Weird Al could make a song based on Shout called Flush, about making sure you’ve flushed the toilet. #ideas #showerthoughts #weirdalsongs

CAMPAMENTO 2026 – Beneficios del Juego Simbólico en Campamentos para Niños

El juego simbólico en un campamento es clave para que los niños procesen su entorno, fomenten la creatividad y desarrollen habilidades sociales al imitar situaciones reales o imaginarias. 

Aquí tienes una lista de ideas de juegos simbólicos organizadas por categorías:

Expresión Dramática y Roles

• El Grito de la Selva: Los niños asumen el rol de animales (macho, hembra o cría) y deben encontrarse con su «familia» haciendo solo los sonidos y gestos del animal que les tocó.
• Teatro de Títeres o Marionetas: Utilizando calcetines viejos o materiales reciclados, los niños crean personajes y actúan historias originales para el resto del grupo.
• Mímica de Películas: Los niños deben representar escenas o títulos de películas sin hablar, usando solo el lenguaje corporal para que su equipo adivine.
• Ser Superhéroes: Con capas y antifaces hechos a mano, los niños imaginan misiones para «salvar el mundo», lo que les ayuda a ganar confianza en sí mismos. 

Construcción y Entorno

• Construir Cabañas o Refugios: Utilizando ramas, sábanas o cartones, los niños crean su propio espacio. Esta actividad suele derivar espontáneamente en juegos de «familias» o «exploradores».
• Búsqueda del Tesoro Simbólica: No solo es buscar objetos, sino adoptar el rol de piratas o exploradores con mapas y pistas que cuentan una historia ficticia.
• La Magia de las Cajas: Proporcionar cajas grandes de cartón para que las transformen en barcos piratas, naves espaciales o casas, decorándolas y habitándolas según su imaginación. 

Situaciones de Vida y Simulación

• Reto de Supervivencia Simbólica: Para niños mayores (10-12 años), se plantea un escenario ficticio (como estar en una isla desierta) donde deben organizar recursos y asignar roles como «encargado de víveres» o «lector de mapas».
• Jugar a «La Familia»: Imitar rutinas diarias como preparar una cena imaginaria con elementos de la naturaleza o cuidar a un «bebé» (que puede ser un tronco o muñeco), lo que fomenta la empatía.
• Mercado o Tienda: Usar elementos recolectados del bosque (piedras, hojas) como «moneda» o productos para intercambiar, simulando un sistema de comercio. 

Tips para Monitores

• Materiales No Estructurados: Ofrece objetos que no tengan un fin único (telas, cajas, palos) para que el niño decida qué significan.
• Fases por Edad: Los más pequeños (2-6 años) prefieren imitar lo cotidiano (cocinitas, médicos), mientras que los mayores disfrutan de mundos fantásticos con reglas más complejas. 

Waynes World LEGO® Ideas Set Brings 90s Basement to Bricks
Party on! Waynes World basement studio LEGO® Ideas project captures 90s nostalgia with custom minifigures, retro furniture, and authentic movie details.

🔗 https://brick.news/articles/lego-ideas-waynes-world-basement-studio-set-brings-90s-nostalgia-to-life?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-710

#MOC #Minifigures #Ideas #LEGOIDEAS

Waynes World LEGO® Ideas Set Brings 90s Basement to Bricks
Party on! Waynes World basement studio LEGO® Ideas project captures 90s nostalgia with custom minifigures, retro furniture, and authentic movie details.

🔗 https://brick.news/articles/lego-ideas-waynes-world-basement-studio-set-brings-90s-nostalgia-to-life?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-710

#MOC #Minifigures #Ideas #LEGOIDEAS

Waynes World LEGO® Ideas Set Brings 90s Basement to Bricks
Party on! Waynes World basement studio LEGO® Ideas project captures 90s nostalgia with custom minifigures, retro furniture, and authentic movie details.

🔗 https://brick.news/articles/lego-ideas-waynes-world-basement-studio-set-brings-90s-nostalgia-to-life?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-710

#MOC #Minifigures #Ideas #LEGOIDEAS

Waynes World LEGO® Ideas Set Brings 90s Basement to Bricks
Party on! Waynes World basement studio LEGO® Ideas project captures 90s nostalgia with custom minifigures, retro furniture, and authentic movie details.

🔗 https://brick.news/articles/lego-ideas-waynes-world-basement-studio-set-brings-90s-nostalgia-to-life?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-710

#MOC #Minifigures #Ideas #LEGOIDEAS

What would I do with the #Sagitta brand??

I want the Sagittarium (name stolen from Jordan) -- an axe-throwing bar with archery 🏹 instead of axes 🪓 bc frankly axes seem too dangerous for drunk folk...

For details, check out our most recent #podcast on #Sagitta in pop culture here: https://starrytimepodcast.podbean.com/e/sagitta-pop-culture-superstar/

#bars #ideas #silly #Sagitta #PopCulture #branding #marketing #proposal #ShowerThoughts #gif

LEGO Ideas Modular Pirate Map - Build Your Own Adventure
Discover the modular LEGO Ideas pirate map with 20 customizable tiles, 2,120 pieces, and endless configuration possibilities. Staff Pick with 155K supporters!

🔗 https://brick.news/articles/lego-ideas-modular-pirate-map-lets-you-build-your-own-high-seas-adventure?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-708

#Ideas #Modular #LEGOIDEAS #LEGOPirates

CAMPAMENTO 2026 – Ideas Divertidas para Juegos de puntería, al Aire Libre

Para un campamento de verano, los juegos de puntería son ideales porque mejoran la coordinación motriz y la concentración de los niños mientras se divierten al aire libre. Aquí tienes varias opciones clasificadas por el tipo de material y dinámica: 

Juegos con Materiales Reciclados o Sencillos

• Lanzamiento de Anillas Caseras: Puedes fabricar anillas recortando el centro de platos de papel y decorándolos. El objetivo es lanzarlas para que encajen en estacas de madera o botellas lastradas con arena.
• Derribar la Torre de Latas: Un clásico muy exitoso donde los niños deben tumbar pirámides de latas vacías lanzando pelotas de tenis o saquitos de arena.
• Diana de Lona: Crea una portería casera con una lona vieja haciendo cortes de diferentes formas geométricas. Asigna una puntuación a cada agujero (por ejemplo, los más pequeños valen más) y rétalos a alcanzar 100 puntos.
• Bolos al Aire Libre: Usa botellas de plástico vacías (puedes ponerles un poco de agua o arena para que no vuelen con el viento) y una pelota para derribarlas. 

Juegos de Puntería Refrescantes (Ideales para el Calor)

• Guerra de Globos de Agua: Además de refrescarse, los niños practican la puntería al intentar alcanzar objetivos móviles (sus compañeros) o fijos.
• Diana con Pistolas de Agua: Dibuja dianas en una cartulina con rotuladores lavables o coloca vasos de plástico ligeros sobre una superficie para que los niños intenten derribarlos usando chorros de agua.
• Llenar el Balde: Coloca un cubo a cierta distancia y haz que los niños lancen esponjas empapadas en agua para llenarlo lo más rápido posible. 

Juegos Tradicionales y de Habilidad

• Petanca o Bochas: Consiste en lanzar bolas para que queden lo más cerca posible de una bola pequeña llamada boliche.
• Herraduras: Los jugadores se turnan para lanzar herraduras (pueden ser de plástico para seguridad) hacia una estaca clavada en el suelo.
• Carrera de Chapas: Dibuja un circuito en la arena o suelo y haz que los niños golpeen sus chapas con los dedos para avanzar sin salirse del camino.
• Diana Gigante con Frisbee: En lugar de dardos, utiliza discos voladores para intentar acertar en zonas marcadas en el suelo o colgadas de un árbol. 

Consejos para la Organización

1. Estaciones de Juego: Divide el grupo en equipos y organiza una yincana de pruebas donde cada estación sea un juego de puntería diferente.
2. Seguridad: Asegúrate de que el área de lanzamiento esté despejada y que los niños esperen su turno detrás de una línea marcada.
3. Adaptación por Edad: Para los más pequeños (4-6 años), usa objetivos más grandes y distancias cortas; para los mayores, introduce obstáculos o blancos en movimiento.

“The #TED approach to idea dissemination is not without its critics. Several authors have criticized TED for flattening or #dumbing #down #ideas so they fit into a preconceived, convenient format that is #primarily #designed to #entertain.”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4140479/

in other words, I’ll take your link to a ted talk or Substack seriously zero days of the week

“The #TED approach to idea dissemination is not without its critics. Several authors have criticized TED for flattening or #dumbing #down #ideas so they fit into a preconceived, convenient format that is #primarily #designed to #entertain.”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4140479/

in other words, I’ll take your link to a ted talk or Substack seriously zero days of the week

“The #TED approach to idea dissemination is not without its critics. Several authors have criticized TED for flattening or #dumbing #down #ideas so they fit into a preconceived, convenient format that is #primarily #designed to #entertain.”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4140479/

in other words, I’ll take your link to a ted talk or Substack seriously zero days of the week

CAMPAMENTO 2026 – Juegos de Construcción para Campamentos de Verano

Los juegos de construcción y manipulación son pilares en los campamentos de verano, ya que fomentan la creatividad, el trabajo en equipo y el desarrollo motor en un entorno lúdico. 

Juegos de Construcción al Aire Libre

Estas actividades aprovechan el espacio exterior y los materiales naturales o de gran escala para crear estructuras impresionantes:

• Construcción de Cabañas y Fuertes: Utilizar ramas, troncos caídos y cuerdas para levantar refugios. Es ideal para dinámicas por equipos o días temáticos (como «vikingos» o «indios»).
• Jenga Gigante: Adaptar el clásico juego con bloques de madera grandes. Los niños deben retirar piezas con cuidado sin que la torre se derrumbe, trabajando la paciencia y la coordinación.
• Circuitos de Canicas (Marble Run): Usar tubos de PVC, cartones o arena para diseñar recorridos complejos donde una canica debe llegar al final sin detenerse.
• Esculturas de Arena o Barro: Si hay acceso a playa o zonas de tierra, crear castillos o figuras detalladas usando cubos, palas y agua para dar consistencia. 

Talleres de Manipulación y Creación (DIY)

Actividades enfocadas en la motricidad fina y la experimentación con diferentes texturas:

• Juego de Construcción en Lata: Crear piezas de madera pintadas con acuarelas que quepan en una lata pequeña. Sirve para que cada niño tenga su propio kit de equilibrio portátil para ratos libres.
• Ensamblaje con Cartón Reciclado: Recortar piezas de cartón con ranuras para que los niños puedan encastrarlas sin necesidad de pegamento, creando ciudades, aviones o animales tridimensionales.
• Modelado con Plastilina Casera: Preparar masa con harina, sal y agua. Se puede tematizar haciendo «plastilina de helado» con colorantes para jugar a las heladerías en el campamento. 

Actividades Sensoriales de Verano

Aprovechan los elementos típicos de la estación para ofrecer experiencias táctiles únicas:

• Construcción con Hielo: Congelar bloques de agua (a veces con flores o juguetes dentro) y dejar que los niños experimenten con la textura mientras intentan apilarlos o «rescatar» los objetos mientras se derriten.
• Cajas Sensoriales de Naturaleza: Llenar contenedores con arena, legumbres, hojas o piedras translúcidas para que los niños manipulen diferentes pesos y colores bajo la luz del sol.
• Pintura con Piedras: Recolectar piedras lisas del entorno y decorarlas para crear un «juego de dominó» natural o personajes para contar historias.

I am thinkin that lgbt people can have kids like normal families, why not to give adoption to lgbt people? Love is love unconditionally from if lgbt or not #lgbtqia #families #thoughts #ideas #lgbtadoptionagreed #RainbowFamilies

CAMPAMENTO 2026 – Retos de Habilidad Física y Mental para Niños

Para un campamento de verano, los juegos de habilidad se pueden dividir en retos físicos (motricidad y equilibrio) y retos mentales (ingenio y memoria). Aquí tienes una selección de actividades variadas y dinámicas: 

Retos de Habilidad Física y Equilibrio

Estas actividades ayudan a desarrollar la coordinación motora y el equilibrio de forma divertida. 

• Carrera con Cuchara y Huevo: Un clásico de equilibrio donde los niños deben recorrer una distancia sosteniendo una cuchara en la boca (o la mano) con un huevo o una pelota de ping pong sin que se caiga.
• Circuito de Obstáculos: Montar un recorrido que incluya gatear bajo cuerdas, saltar aros, caminar sobre una línea recta en el suelo o mantener el equilibrio en una pierna.
• Boliche con Botellas: Utiliza botellas recicladas y pelotas ligeras para que los niños practiquen su puntería y percepción espacial al derribarlas.
• Guerra de Globos de Agua: Ideal para el verano; requiere habilidad para lanzar y atrapar sin que el globo explote, fomentando la coordinación mano-ojo.
• Limbo con Aspersores: Una variante refrescante del limbo donde los niños deben pasar bajo un chorro de agua o una barra sin tocarlo, trabajando la flexibilidad y el equilibrio. 

Retos de Ingenio y Habilidad Mental

Perfectos para momentos de menos actividad física o días de calor intenso.

• Búsqueda del Tesoro Natural: Los niños deben encontrar objetos específicos de la naturaleza (una piedra lisa, una hoja roja, etc.) siguiendo pistas, lo que estimula la observación y el razonamiento.
• Jenga Gigante: Construir una torre con bloques de madera grandes donde el reto es retirar piezas sin que la estructura se derrumbe, trabajando la paciencia y la precisión.
• Escape Room al Aire Libre: Plantear una serie de acertijos, mensajes cifrados y candados que los niños deben resolver en equipo para «escapar» de una zona del campamento.
• Adivinanzas con Mímica (Películas): Fomenta la expresión corporal y la agilidad mental al tener que representar conceptos sin hablar para que su equipo los adivine.
• Juegos de Memoria Facial: Mostrar la foto de un personaje o monitor durante 30 segundos y luego hacer preguntas detalladas sobre su apariencia para entrenar la atención sostenida. 

Juegos de Habilidad Grupal

• Construcción de Balsas o Fuertes: Actividad en equipo que combina habilidades prácticas de construcción con ramas o materiales reciclados y planificación estratégica.
• Captura la Bandera: Un juego de estrategia y velocidad donde dos equipos deben robar la bandera del campo contrario sin ser atrapados.
• Balón Prisionero (Dodgeball): Requiere rapidez de reflejos para esquivar la pelota y puntería para eliminar a los jugadores del equipo contrario.

CAMPAMENTO 2026 – Retos de Habilidad Física y Mental para Niños

Para un campamento de verano, los juegos de habilidad se pueden dividir en retos físicos (motricidad y equilibrio) y retos mentales (ingenio y memoria). Aquí tienes una selección de actividades variadas y dinámicas: 

Retos de Habilidad Física y Equilibrio

Estas actividades ayudan a desarrollar la coordinación motora y el equilibrio de forma divertida. 

• Carrera con Cuchara y Huevo: Un clásico de equilibrio donde los niños deben recorrer una distancia sosteniendo una cuchara en la boca (o la mano) con un huevo o una pelota de ping pong sin que se caiga.
• Circuito de Obstáculos: Montar un recorrido que incluya gatear bajo cuerdas, saltar aros, caminar sobre una línea recta en el suelo o mantener el equilibrio en una pierna.
• Boliche con Botellas: Utiliza botellas recicladas y pelotas ligeras para que los niños practiquen su puntería y percepción espacial al derribarlas.
• Guerra de Globos de Agua: Ideal para el verano; requiere habilidad para lanzar y atrapar sin que el globo explote, fomentando la coordinación mano-ojo.
• Limbo con Aspersores: Una variante refrescante del limbo donde los niños deben pasar bajo un chorro de agua o una barra sin tocarlo, trabajando la flexibilidad y el equilibrio. 

Retos de Ingenio y Habilidad Mental

Perfectos para momentos de menos actividad física o días de calor intenso.

• Búsqueda del Tesoro Natural: Los niños deben encontrar objetos específicos de la naturaleza (una piedra lisa, una hoja roja, etc.) siguiendo pistas, lo que estimula la observación y el razonamiento.
• Jenga Gigante: Construir una torre con bloques de madera grandes donde el reto es retirar piezas sin que la estructura se derrumbe, trabajando la paciencia y la precisión.
• Escape Room al Aire Libre: Plantear una serie de acertijos, mensajes cifrados y candados que los niños deben resolver en equipo para «escapar» de una zona del campamento.
• Adivinanzas con Mímica (Películas): Fomenta la expresión corporal y la agilidad mental al tener que representar conceptos sin hablar para que su equipo los adivine.
• Juegos de Memoria Facial: Mostrar la foto de un personaje o monitor durante 30 segundos y luego hacer preguntas detalladas sobre su apariencia para entrenar la atención sostenida. 

Juegos de Habilidad Grupal

• Construcción de Balsas o Fuertes: Actividad en equipo que combina habilidades prácticas de construcción con ramas o materiales reciclados y planificación estratégica.
• Captura la Bandera: Un juego de estrategia y velocidad donde dos equipos deben robar la bandera del campo contrario sin ser atrapados.
• Balón Prisionero (Dodgeball): Requiere rapidez de reflejos para esquivar la pelota y puntería para eliminar a los jugadores del equipo contrario.

CAMPAMENTO 2026 – Retos de Habilidad Física y Mental para Niños

Para un campamento de verano, los juegos de habilidad se pueden dividir en retos físicos (motricidad y equilibrio) y retos mentales (ingenio y memoria). Aquí tienes una selección de actividades variadas y dinámicas: 

Retos de Habilidad Física y Equilibrio

Estas actividades ayudan a desarrollar la coordinación motora y el equilibrio de forma divertida. 

• Carrera con Cuchara y Huevo: Un clásico de equilibrio donde los niños deben recorrer una distancia sosteniendo una cuchara en la boca (o la mano) con un huevo o una pelota de ping pong sin que se caiga.
• Circuito de Obstáculos: Montar un recorrido que incluya gatear bajo cuerdas, saltar aros, caminar sobre una línea recta en el suelo o mantener el equilibrio en una pierna.
• Boliche con Botellas: Utiliza botellas recicladas y pelotas ligeras para que los niños practiquen su puntería y percepción espacial al derribarlas.
• Guerra de Globos de Agua: Ideal para el verano; requiere habilidad para lanzar y atrapar sin que el globo explote, fomentando la coordinación mano-ojo.
• Limbo con Aspersores: Una variante refrescante del limbo donde los niños deben pasar bajo un chorro de agua o una barra sin tocarlo, trabajando la flexibilidad y el equilibrio. 

Retos de Ingenio y Habilidad Mental

Perfectos para momentos de menos actividad física o días de calor intenso.

• Búsqueda del Tesoro Natural: Los niños deben encontrar objetos específicos de la naturaleza (una piedra lisa, una hoja roja, etc.) siguiendo pistas, lo que estimula la observación y el razonamiento.
• Jenga Gigante: Construir una torre con bloques de madera grandes donde el reto es retirar piezas sin que la estructura se derrumbe, trabajando la paciencia y la precisión.
• Escape Room al Aire Libre: Plantear una serie de acertijos, mensajes cifrados y candados que los niños deben resolver en equipo para «escapar» de una zona del campamento.
• Adivinanzas con Mímica (Películas): Fomenta la expresión corporal y la agilidad mental al tener que representar conceptos sin hablar para que su equipo los adivine.
• Juegos de Memoria Facial: Mostrar la foto de un personaje o monitor durante 30 segundos y luego hacer preguntas detalladas sobre su apariencia para entrenar la atención sostenida. 

Juegos de Habilidad Grupal

• Construcción de Balsas o Fuertes: Actividad en equipo que combina habilidades prácticas de construcción con ramas o materiales reciclados y planificación estratégica.
• Captura la Bandera: Un juego de estrategia y velocidad donde dos equipos deben robar la bandera del campo contrario sin ser atrapados.
• Balón Prisionero (Dodgeball): Requiere rapidez de reflejos para esquivar la pelota y puntería para eliminar a los jugadores del equipo contrario.

CAMPAMENTO 2026 – Retos de Habilidad Física y Mental para Niños

Para un campamento de verano, los juegos de habilidad se pueden dividir en retos físicos (motricidad y equilibrio) y retos mentales (ingenio y memoria). Aquí tienes una selección de actividades variadas y dinámicas: 

Retos de Habilidad Física y Equilibrio

Estas actividades ayudan a desarrollar la coordinación motora y el equilibrio de forma divertida. 

• Carrera con Cuchara y Huevo: Un clásico de equilibrio donde los niños deben recorrer una distancia sosteniendo una cuchara en la boca (o la mano) con un huevo o una pelota de ping pong sin que se caiga.
• Circuito de Obstáculos: Montar un recorrido que incluya gatear bajo cuerdas, saltar aros, caminar sobre una línea recta en el suelo o mantener el equilibrio en una pierna.
• Boliche con Botellas: Utiliza botellas recicladas y pelotas ligeras para que los niños practiquen su puntería y percepción espacial al derribarlas.
• Guerra de Globos de Agua: Ideal para el verano; requiere habilidad para lanzar y atrapar sin que el globo explote, fomentando la coordinación mano-ojo.
• Limbo con Aspersores: Una variante refrescante del limbo donde los niños deben pasar bajo un chorro de agua o una barra sin tocarlo, trabajando la flexibilidad y el equilibrio. 

Retos de Ingenio y Habilidad Mental

Perfectos para momentos de menos actividad física o días de calor intenso.

• Búsqueda del Tesoro Natural: Los niños deben encontrar objetos específicos de la naturaleza (una piedra lisa, una hoja roja, etc.) siguiendo pistas, lo que estimula la observación y el razonamiento.
• Jenga Gigante: Construir una torre con bloques de madera grandes donde el reto es retirar piezas sin que la estructura se derrumbe, trabajando la paciencia y la precisión.
• Escape Room al Aire Libre: Plantear una serie de acertijos, mensajes cifrados y candados que los niños deben resolver en equipo para «escapar» de una zona del campamento.
• Adivinanzas con Mímica (Películas): Fomenta la expresión corporal y la agilidad mental al tener que representar conceptos sin hablar para que su equipo los adivine.
• Juegos de Memoria Facial: Mostrar la foto de un personaje o monitor durante 30 segundos y luego hacer preguntas detalladas sobre su apariencia para entrenar la atención sostenida. 

Juegos de Habilidad Grupal

• Construcción de Balsas o Fuertes: Actividad en equipo que combina habilidades prácticas de construcción con ramas o materiales reciclados y planificación estratégica.
• Captura la Bandera: Un juego de estrategia y velocidad donde dos equipos deben robar la bandera del campo contrario sin ser atrapados.
• Balón Prisionero (Dodgeball): Requiere rapidez de reflejos para esquivar la pelota y puntería para eliminar a los jugadores del equipo contrario.

Christmas Vacation LEGO® House is Real - Clark Would Be Proud
The Griswold House from Christmas Vacation becomes an official LEGO® set! Modular design, holiday chaos, and minifigures of the whole family included.
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/legor-christmas-vacation-griswold-house-the-gift-that-keeps-on-building?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-912
#Minifigures #Ideas #Modular #LEGOIDEAS

LEGO® Ideas Second 2025 Review Results: Edward Scissorhands, Amsterdam Canal Houses, National Lampoons Christmas Vacation & The Old Man and the Sea Confirmed
Four fan designs just made it through LEGO® Ideas biggest-ever review: Edward Scissorhands, Amsterdam Canal Houses, National Lampoons Christmas Vacation, and The Old Man and the Sea are officially becoming sets. Heres everything you need to know.
🔗 https://brick.news/articles/legor-ideas-second-2025-review-results-edward-scissorhands-amsterdam-canal-houses-national-lampoons-christmas-vacation-and-the-old-man-and-the-sea-are-all-go?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=buffer&utm_content=article-911
#Ideas #Modular #LEGOIDEAS #LEGOModular

WHY I APPROVE ALL COMMENTS ON MY BLOGS, EVEN THE ONES THAT DISAGREE WITH ME

https://jaimedavid.blog/2026/04/26/14/27/10/analysis/jaimedavid327/10770/why-i-approve-all-comments-on-my-blogs-even-the-ones-that-disagree-with-me/

Kem Ormond’s vegetable garden: A glasshouse or tunnel house can extend your growing period https://www.allforgardening.com/1732494/kem-ormonds-vegetable-garden-a-glasshouse-or-tunnel-house-can-extend-your-growing-period/ #also #cân #country #Extend #Extending #features #garden #gardener #giving #glasshouse #growing #house #ideas #keen #kem #or #ormond #ormonds #Period #Shes #this #tunnel #Vegetable #week #writer #your

"palabras" 2020
https://www.facebook.com/encarnilfrances
#prototipo #artecontemporaneo #scultureart #museo #sculture #arteconceptual #crear #artista #arteespañol #ideas #arte #watercolor #escultura #filosofia #artistavisual #artist #museos #dibujos #acuarela #galeriadearte #conceptualart #palabras #encarnilfrances #poetry #poesie #galeriasdearte #artcontemporain #drawings #artgallery #art

"palabras" 2020
https://www.facebook.com/encarnilfrances
#prototipo #artecontemporaneo #scultureart #museo #sculture #arteconceptual #crear #artista #arteespañol #ideas #arte #watercolor #escultura #filosofia #artistavisual #artist #museos #dibujos #acuarela #galeriadearte #conceptualart #palabras #encarnilfrances #poetry #poesie #galeriasdearte #artcontemporain #drawings #artgallery #art

"palabras" 2020
https://www.facebook.com/encarnilfrances
#prototipo #artecontemporaneo #scultureart #museo #sculture #arteconceptual #crear #artista #arteespañol #ideas #arte #watercolor #escultura #filosofia #artistavisual #artist #museos #dibujos #acuarela #galeriadearte #conceptualart #palabras #encarnilfrances #poetry #poesie #galeriasdearte #artcontemporain #drawings #artgallery #art