#peerreview — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #peerreview, aggregated by home.social.
-
In the Q&A/ discussion the topics of #OpenReviews and #PostPublication review came up, as well as options on how to make #PeerReview work more visible.
Especially the latter could have had more room for me, as views were seemingly different (e.g.,
@hansonmark.bsky.social
?), but alas, time ran out!An excellent impulse event, a great way to spend my lunch time!
-
In the Q&A/ discussion the topics of #OpenReviews and #PostPublication review came up, as well as options on how to make #PeerReview work more visible.
Especially the latter could have had more room for me, as views were seemingly different (e.g.,
@hansonmark.bsky.social
?), but alas, time ran out!An excellent impulse event, a great way to spend my lunch time!
-
In the Q&A/ discussion the topics of #OpenReviews and #PostPublication review came up, as well as options on how to make #PeerReview work more visible.
Especially the latter could have had more room for me, as views were seemingly different (e.g.,
@hansonmark.bsky.social
?), but alas, time ran out!An excellent impulse event, a great way to spend my lunch time!
-
In the Q&A/ discussion the topics of #OpenReviews and #PostPublication review came up, as well as options on how to make #PeerReview work more visible.
Especially the latter could have had more room for me, as views were seemingly different (e.g.,
@hansonmark.bsky.social
?), but alas, time ran out!An excellent impulse event, a great way to spend my lunch time!
-
From the audience, reviewqualitycollector.org was brought in.
According to them, an "initiative for improving the quality of scientific peer review by turning reviewing into a source of reputation. It provides a mechanism that supplies a reviewer with a receipt for their work for each conference instance or journal year."
Certainly something to look into.
-
From the audience, reviewqualitycollector.org was brought in.
According to them, an "initiative for improving the quality of scientific peer review by turning reviewing into a source of reputation. It provides a mechanism that supplies a reviewer with a receipt for their work for each conference instance or journal year."
Certainly something to look into.
-
From the audience, reviewqualitycollector.org was brought in.
According to them, an "initiative for improving the quality of scientific peer review by turning reviewing into a source of reputation. It provides a mechanism that supplies a reviewer with a receipt for their work for each conference instance or journal year."
Certainly something to look into.
-
From the audience, reviewqualitycollector.org was brought in.
According to them, an "initiative for improving the quality of scientific peer review by turning reviewing into a source of reputation. It provides a mechanism that supplies a reviewer with a receipt for their work for each conference instance or journal year."
Certainly something to look into.
-
. @alexh talked about letters rejecting #PeerReview requests for specific publishers, e.g., here on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexholcombe_declining-another-review-request-from-an-share-7426356814121689088-N0Kz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAD0JHkBcK9LoDUuScfOpFwbt_UMALGWLV8@priyasilverstein discussed the role of editors in #OpenScience, and offered the example of the guide for #SocialScience journal editors on easing into #OpenScience
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5
#JEDI #JournalEditing #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor -
. @alexh talked about letters rejecting #PeerReview requests for specific publishers, e.g., here on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexholcombe_declining-another-review-request-from-an-share-7426356814121689088-N0Kz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAD0JHkBcK9LoDUuScfOpFwbt_UMALGWLV8@priyasilverstein discussed the role of editors in #OpenScience, and offered the example of the guide for #SocialScience journal editors on easing into #OpenScience
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5
#JEDI #JournalEditing #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor -
. @alexh talked about letters rejecting #PeerReview requests for specific publishers, e.g., here on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexholcombe_declining-another-review-request-from-an-share-7426356814121689088-N0Kz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAD0JHkBcK9LoDUuScfOpFwbt_UMALGWLV8@priyasilverstein discussed the role of editors in #OpenScience, and offered the example of the guide for #SocialScience journal editors on easing into #OpenScience
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5
#JEDI #JournalEditing #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor -
. @alexh talked about letters rejecting #PeerReview requests for specific publishers, e.g., here on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexholcombe_declining-another-review-request-from-an-share-7426356814121689088-N0Kz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAD0JHkBcK9LoDUuScfOpFwbt_UMALGWLV8@priyasilverstein discussed the role of editors in #OpenScience, and offered the example of the guide for #SocialScience journal editors on easing into #OpenScience
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5
#JEDI #JournalEditing #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor -
RE: https://fediscience.org/@alexh/116518145538497476
This was really interesting 👏
Some slides from the event have been posted here:
https://zenodo.org/communities/muecos/records?q=&l=list&p=1&s=10&sort=newestAnd some of the resources and topics that came up 👇
The #ECR reviewer's platform aims to empower junior reviewers and equip #ECRs with the necessary skills to conduct methodologically rigorous reviews
ecr-reviewers.gitlab.io/guide/
#PostGraduate #PGR#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity
-
RE: https://fediscience.org/@alexh/116518145538497476
This was really interesting 👏
Some slides from the event have been posted here:
https://zenodo.org/communities/muecos/records?q=&l=list&p=1&s=10&sort=newestAnd some of the resources and topics that came up 👇
The #ECR reviewer's platform aims to empower junior reviewers and equip #ECRs with the necessary skills to conduct methodologically rigorous reviews
ecr-reviewers.gitlab.io/guide/
#PostGraduate #PGR#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity
-
RE: https://fediscience.org/@alexh/116518145538497476
This was really interesting 👏
Some slides from the event have been posted here:
https://zenodo.org/communities/muecos/records?q=&l=list&p=1&s=10&sort=newestAnd some of the resources and topics that came up 👇
The #ECR reviewer's platform aims to empower junior reviewers and equip #ECRs with the necessary skills to conduct methodologically rigorous reviews
ecr-reviewers.gitlab.io/guide/
#PostGraduate #PGR#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity
-
RE: https://fediscience.org/@alexh/116518145538497476
This was really interesting 👏
Some slides from the event have been posted here:
https://zenodo.org/communities/muecos/records?q=&l=list&p=1&s=10&sort=newestAnd some of the resources and topics that came up 👇
The #ECR reviewer's platform aims to empower junior reviewers and equip #ECRs with the necessary skills to conduct methodologically rigorous reviews
ecr-reviewers.gitlab.io/guide/
#PostGraduate #PGR#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity
-
Tough peer-review process? Your paper might end up being more highly cited https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01615-4 #science #peerreview #constructivefeedback
-
Tough peer-review process? Your paper might end up being more highly cited https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01615-4 #science #peerreview #constructivefeedback
-
Tough peer-review process? Your paper might end up being more highly cited https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01615-4 #science #peerreview #constructivefeedback
-
Tough peer-review process? Your paper might end up being more highly cited https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01615-4 #science #peerreview #constructivefeedback
-
Tough peer-review process? Your paper might end up being more highly cited https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01615-4 #science #peerreview #constructivefeedback
-
📢 PREreview & JMIR Publications team up to improve scholarly peer review!
Join us for our next #LiveReview event on June 4, 2026, at 15:00 UTC, where we will be reviewing this preprint on the implementation of digital data in pediatric cardiology: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.100170
✍ Sign up now: https://bit.ly/Jun4-Live-Review
👐 Anyone interested in the research topic under discussion, and armed with respect and a constructive attitude is invited!
-
📢 PREreview & JMIR Publications team up to improve scholarly peer review!
Join us for our next #LiveReview event on June 4, 2026, at 15:00 UTC, where we will be reviewing this preprint on the implementation of digital data in pediatric cardiology: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.100170
✍ Sign up now: https://bit.ly/Jun4-Live-Review
👐 Anyone interested in the research topic under discussion, and armed with respect and a constructive attitude is invited!
-
📢 PREreview & JMIR Publications team up to improve scholarly peer review!
Join us for our next #LiveReview event on June 4, 2026, at 15:00 UTC, where we will be reviewing this preprint on the implementation of digital data in pediatric cardiology: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.100170
✍ Sign up now: https://bit.ly/Jun4-Live-Review
👐 Anyone interested in the research topic under discussion, and armed with respect and a constructive attitude is invited!
-
📢 PREreview & JMIR Publications team up to improve scholarly peer review!
Join us for our next #LiveReview event on June 4, 2026, at 15:00 UTC, where we will be reviewing this preprint on the implementation of digital data in pediatric cardiology: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.100170
✍ Sign up now: https://bit.ly/Jun4-Live-Review
👐 Anyone interested in the research topic under discussion, and armed with respect and a constructive attitude is invited!
-
📢 PREreview & JMIR Publications team up to improve scholarly peer review!
Join us for our next #LiveReview event on June 4, 2026, at 15:00 UTC, where we will be reviewing this preprint on the implementation of digital data in pediatric cardiology: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.100170
✍ Sign up now: https://bit.ly/Jun4-Live-Review
👐 Anyone interested in the research topic under discussion, and armed with respect and a constructive attitude is invited!
-
Received reviewer comments? Take a deep breath—we’ve got you covered. 🧘♂️
#PeerReview is a critical step toward publication, but knowing how to respond to critiques is just as important as the #research itself. Here are 5 quick tips to handle the process like a pro: https://buff.ly/AudhY57
-
Received reviewer comments? Take a deep breath—we’ve got you covered. 🧘♂️
#PeerReview is a critical step toward publication, but knowing how to respond to critiques is just as important as the #research itself. Here are 5 quick tips to handle the process like a pro: https://buff.ly/AudhY57
-
Received reviewer comments? Take a deep breath—we’ve got you covered. 🧘♂️
#PeerReview is a critical step toward publication, but knowing how to respond to critiques is just as important as the #research itself. Here are 5 quick tips to handle the process like a pro: https://buff.ly/AudhY57
-
Received reviewer comments? Take a deep breath—we’ve got you covered. 🧘♂️
#PeerReview is a critical step toward publication, but knowing how to respond to critiques is just as important as the #research itself. Here are 5 quick tips to handle the process like a pro: https://buff.ly/AudhY57
-
37th #OpenScience Meet-up #gottingen
#PeerReview in the age of AI“Peer review remains a corner stone of quality assurance and selection processes in scholarly publishing and for research funding. However, authors and reviewers face multiple challenges. Reviewers are faced with a glut of review requests, often poor matches of expertise areas and short deadlines. Moreover, they are faced with quality issues that can arise from the use of AI by authors, e.g. hallucinated citations and manipulations of images.
AI-assistance is now available at all stages of the research cycle and the publication process: for the creation of project proposals or academic works, editorial screening of manuscripts, compliance checks, review of manuscripts, formatting, metadata generation, metrics and dissemination.“
20260623T1300 CEST
-
37th #OpenScience Meet-up #gottingen
#PeerReview in the age of AI“Peer review remains a corner stone of quality assurance and selection processes in scholarly publishing and for research funding. However, authors and reviewers face multiple challenges. Reviewers are faced with a glut of review requests, often poor matches of expertise areas and short deadlines. Moreover, they are faced with quality issues that can arise from the use of AI by authors, e.g. hallucinated citations and manipulations of images.
AI-assistance is now available at all stages of the research cycle and the publication process: for the creation of project proposals or academic works, editorial screening of manuscripts, compliance checks, review of manuscripts, formatting, metadata generation, metrics and dissemination.“
20260623T1300 CEST
-
37th #OpenScience Meet-up #gottingen
#PeerReview in the age of AI“Peer review remains a corner stone of quality assurance and selection processes in scholarly publishing and for research funding. However, authors and reviewers face multiple challenges. Reviewers are faced with a glut of review requests, often poor matches of expertise areas and short deadlines. Moreover, they are faced with quality issues that can arise from the use of AI by authors, e.g. hallucinated citations and manipulations of images.
AI-assistance is now available at all stages of the research cycle and the publication process: for the creation of project proposals or academic works, editorial screening of manuscripts, compliance checks, review of manuscripts, formatting, metadata generation, metrics and dissemination.“
20260623T1300 CEST
-
37th #OpenScience Meet-up #gottingen
#PeerReview in the age of AI“Peer review remains a corner stone of quality assurance and selection processes in scholarly publishing and for research funding. However, authors and reviewers face multiple challenges. Reviewers are faced with a glut of review requests, often poor matches of expertise areas and short deadlines. Moreover, they are faced with quality issues that can arise from the use of AI by authors, e.g. hallucinated citations and manipulations of images.
AI-assistance is now available at all stages of the research cycle and the publication process: for the creation of project proposals or academic works, editorial screening of manuscripts, compliance checks, review of manuscripts, formatting, metadata generation, metrics and dissemination.“
20260623T1300 CEST
-
37th #OpenScience Meet-up #gottingen
#PeerReview in the age of AI“Peer review remains a corner stone of quality assurance and selection processes in scholarly publishing and for research funding. However, authors and reviewers face multiple challenges. Reviewers are faced with a glut of review requests, often poor matches of expertise areas and short deadlines. Moreover, they are faced with quality issues that can arise from the use of AI by authors, e.g. hallucinated citations and manipulations of images.
AI-assistance is now available at all stages of the research cycle and the publication process: for the creation of project proposals or academic works, editorial screening of manuscripts, compliance checks, review of manuscripts, formatting, metadata generation, metrics and dissemination.“
20260623T1300 CEST
-
Fellow scholars, I admit I don't understand the need of splitting a manuscript into multiple .tex files (abstract.tex, introduction.tex, etc) and use main.tex to wrap them all. How ugly and inconvenient is that? It's a paper, not a codebase! I suspect this is an ancestral fear of merge conflicts from the SVN era!
Gone are the days of dreadful SVN,
When clashing scribes brought ruin to the pen.
Now we have Git, and blessed be it.
Fear no concurrency, nor let thy .tex be split!#latex #science #academia #humor #svn #poetry #paper #peerreview
-
Fellow scholars, I admit I don't understand the need of splitting a manuscript into multiple .tex files (abstract.tex, introduction.tex, etc) and use main.tex to wrap them all. How ugly and inconvenient is that? It's a paper, not a codebase! I suspect this is an ancestral fear of merge conflicts from the SVN era!
Gone are the days of dreadful SVN,
When clashing scribes brought ruin to the pen.
Now we have Git, and blessed be it.
Fear no concurrency, nor let thy .tex be split!#latex #science #academia #humor #svn #poetry #paper #peerreview
-
Fellow scholars, I admit I don't understand the need of splitting a manuscript into multiple .tex files (abstract.tex, introduction.tex, etc) and use main.tex to wrap them all. How ugly and inconvenient is that? It's a paper, not a codebase! I suspect this is an ancestral fear of merge conflicts from the SVN era!
Gone are the days of dreadful SVN,
When clashing scribes brought ruin to the pen.
Now we have Git, and blessed be it.
Fear no concurrency, nor let thy .tex be split!#latex #science #academia #humor #svn #poetry #paper #peerreview
-
Fellow scholars, I admit I don't understand the need of splitting a manuscript into multiple .tex files (abstract.tex, introduction.tex, etc) and use main.tex to wrap them all. How ugly and inconvenient is that? It's a paper, not a codebase! I suspect this is an ancestral fear of merge conflicts from the SVN era!
Gone are the days of dreadful SVN,
When clashing scribes brought ruin to the pen.
Now we have Git, and blessed be it.
Fear no concurrency, nor let thy .tex be split!#latex #science #academia #humor #svn #poetry #paper #peerreview
-
Fellow scholars, I admit I don't understand the need of splitting a manuscript into multiple .tex files (abstract.tex, introduction.tex, etc) and use main.tex to wrap them all. How ugly and inconvenient is that? It's a paper, not a codebase! I suspect this is an ancestral fear of merge conflicts from the SVN era!
Gone are the days of dreadful SVN,
When clashing scribes brought ruin to the pen.
Now we have Git, and blessed be it.
Fear no concurrency, nor let thy .tex be split!#latex #science #academia #humor #svn #poetry #paper #peerreview
-
We’re excited to share that we'll soon begin translating and localizing PREreview into Arabic & French!
🗓️ Join us for an info session on 2 June at 2pm UTC & learn how you can contribute to this work.
🔗 Sign up here: https://content.prereview.org/localization-and-translation-info-session/
-
We’re excited to share that we'll soon begin translating and localizing PREreview into Arabic & French!
🗓️ Join us for an info session on 2 June at 2pm UTC & learn how you can contribute to this work.
🔗 Sign up here: https://content.prereview.org/localization-and-translation-info-session/
-
We’re excited to share that we'll soon begin translating and localizing PREreview into Arabic & French!
🗓️ Join us for an info session on 2 June at 2pm UTC & learn how you can contribute to this work.
🔗 Sign up here: https://content.prereview.org/localization-and-translation-info-session/
-
We’re excited to share that we'll soon begin translating and localizing PREreview into Arabic & French!
🗓️ Join us for an info session on 2 June at 2pm UTC & learn how you can contribute to this work.
🔗 Sign up here: https://content.prereview.org/localization-and-translation-info-session/
-
We’re excited to share that we'll soon begin translating and localizing PREreview into Arabic & French!
🗓️ Join us for an info session on 2 June at 2pm UTC & learn how you can contribute to this work.
🔗 Sign up here: https://content.prereview.org/localization-and-translation-info-session/
-
On #arxiv, authors of a new study conclude that open #PeerReview isn't just a #gatekeeping mechanism, and that #scientific papers with a greater #revision #burden are more likely to end up being highly #cited." 🌟 https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14047 (H/T to @enniscath.bsky.social.)
-
On #arxiv, authors of a new study conclude that open #PeerReview isn't just a #gatekeeping mechanism, and that #scientific papers with a greater #revision #burden are more likely to end up being highly #cited." 🌟 https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14047 (H/T to @enniscath.bsky.social.)
-
On #arxiv, authors of a new study conclude that open #PeerReview isn't just a #gatekeeping mechanism, and that #scientific papers with a greater #revision #burden are more likely to end up being highly #cited." 🌟 https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14047 (H/T to @enniscath.bsky.social.)
-
On #arxiv, authors of a new study conclude that open #PeerReview isn't just a #gatekeeping mechanism, and that #scientific papers with a greater #revision #burden are more likely to end up being highly #cited." 🌟 https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14047 (H/T to @enniscath.bsky.social.)
-
On #arxiv, authors of a new study conclude that open #PeerReview isn't just a #gatekeeping mechanism, and that #scientific papers with a greater #revision #burden are more likely to end up being highly #cited." 🌟 https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14047 (H/T to @enniscath.bsky.social.)