#funding — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #funding, aggregated by home.social.
-
@sanders.senate.gov Even summaries are too long to put here (full report below), but it says it's a great idea you have. It easily works in #Washington State. Of course it would work so much better if we could come together nationally. #AI is the perfect #funding #mechanism for ending #homelessness.
Washington Housing Endowment E... -
@sanders.senate.gov Even summaries are too long to put here (full report below), but it says it's a great idea you have. It easily works in #Washington State. Of course it would work so much better if we could come together nationally. #AI is the perfect #funding #mechanism for ending #homelessness.
Washington Housing Endowment E... -
@sanders.senate.gov Even summaries are too long to put here (full report below), but it says it's a great idea you have. It easily works in #Washington State. Of course it would work so much better if we could come together nationally. #AI is the perfect #funding #mechanism for ending #homelessness.
Washington Housing Endowment E... -
@sanders.senate.gov Even summaries are too long to put here (full report below), but it says it's a great idea you have. It easily works in #Washington State. Of course it would work so much better if we could come together nationally. #AI is the perfect #funding #mechanism for ending #homelessness.
Washington Housing Endowment E... -
@sanders.senate.gov Even summaries are too long to put here (full report below), but it says it's a great idea you have. It easily works in #Washington State. Of course it would work so much better if we could come together nationally. #AI is the perfect #funding #mechanism for ending #homelessness.
Washington Housing Endowment E... -
From the Scholarly Kitchen blog, a discussion by scientists about what the Trump administration’s #NIH #funding #cuts are doing to #science and #scientists: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/08/up-close-and-personal-with-the-trump-administrations-nih-funding-cuts-an-interview-with-sylvia-chou-and-alexa-romberg/ 🧪
-
From the Scholarly Kitchen blog, a discussion by scientists about what the Trump administration’s #NIH #funding #cuts are doing to #science and #scientists: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/08/up-close-and-personal-with-the-trump-administrations-nih-funding-cuts-an-interview-with-sylvia-chou-and-alexa-romberg/ 🧪
-
From the Scholarly Kitchen blog, a discussion by scientists about what the Trump administration’s #NIH #funding #cuts are doing to #science and #scientists: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/08/up-close-and-personal-with-the-trump-administrations-nih-funding-cuts-an-interview-with-sylvia-chou-and-alexa-romberg/ 🧪
-
From the Scholarly Kitchen blog, a discussion by scientists about what the Trump administration’s #NIH #funding #cuts are doing to #science and #scientists: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/08/up-close-and-personal-with-the-trump-administrations-nih-funding-cuts-an-interview-with-sylvia-chou-and-alexa-romberg/ 🧪
-
From the Scholarly Kitchen blog, a discussion by scientists about what the Trump administration’s #NIH #funding #cuts are doing to #science and #scientists: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/08/up-close-and-personal-with-the-trump-administrations-nih-funding-cuts-an-interview-with-sylvia-chou-and-alexa-romberg/ 🧪
-
Health Aid Collapses 46%: USD 8 Billion Gone, 63% Below 2022 Peak
A major topic of bilateral aid for many years, health ranked third for volume of funds in 2024 (USD 17.6 billion), after humanitarian aid only and aid for government/civil society. But that position is declining rapidly.
#BreakingNews #EconomicNews #Aid #Funding #ODA #Health #OECD
-
Health Aid Collapses 46%: USD 8 Billion Gone, 63% Below 2022 Peak
A major topic of bilateral aid for many years, health ranked third for volume of funds in 2024 (USD 17.6 billion), after humanitarian aid only and aid for government/civil society. But that position is declining rapidly.
#BreakingNews #EconomicNews #Aid #Funding #ODA #Health #OECD
-
Health Aid Collapses 46%: USD 8 Billion Gone, 63% Below 2022 Peak
A major topic of bilateral aid for many years, health ranked third for volume of funds in 2024 (USD 17.6 billion), after humanitarian aid only and aid for government/civil society. But that position is declining rapidly.
#BreakingNews #EconomicNews #Aid #Funding #ODA #Health #OECD
-
Autumn Grants Update for Eligible Industrial Heritage Museums & Sites
This autumn’s round of heritage grants include three available for industrial heritage museums (accredited or working towards accreditation) and other industrial sites.
Museum Learning and Engagement Grants
Museum Development is delivering the ‘Museum Learning and Engagement Grants’ on behalf of Arts Council England, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), and the Department for Education. This is a one-off, rapid-response small grant programme designed to give an opportunity for museums to undertake innovative pilot project projects to improve access to cultural learning opportunities for children and young people, particularly in underserved communities and areas of low engagement. The programme has been designed to provide continuity and maintain momentum to Museums and Schools objectives, while future museum education investment is developed. Those eligible are:
- ACE National Portfolio Organisations, Accredited and Working Towards Accreditation museums
- Museum partners who are current recipients of The Museums and Schools Programme grant
The deadline is 29 September. Follow this link for more information: Museum Learning and Engagement grants
Museum Transformation Fund Now Open
Another Arts Council England fund is the Museum Transformation Programme which is designed to enable Accredited Museums to address the longer-term challenges they face. It is also intended to support them to undertake the fundamental shift in their operational models required to stabilise their finances and continue to deliver for their audiences and communities. Grants of £50k to £1 million are available. Deadline is 30 September. Follow this link for further details: Museum Transformation Programme.
Garfield Weston Foundation
Finally, the Garfield Weston Foundation support a wide range of charities that make a positive difference, working in different sectors in the UK. These include welfare, youth, community, environment, education, health, arts, heritage, and faith. Their grants range from £1,000 to several million pounds, depending on each charity’s size and scope of work. Applications are open all year round. Follow this link for more details: Garfield Weston Foundation
#funding #grants #history #museums -
Autumn Grants Update for Eligible Industrial Heritage Museums & Sites
This autumn’s round of heritage grants include three available for industrial heritage museums (accredited or working towards accreditation) and other industrial sites.
Museum Learning and Engagement Grants
Museum Development is delivering the ‘Museum Learning and Engagement Grants’ on behalf of Arts Council England, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), and the Department for Education. This is a one-off, rapid-response small grant programme designed to give an opportunity for museums to undertake innovative pilot project projects to improve access to cultural learning opportunities for children and young people, particularly in underserved communities and areas of low engagement. The programme has been designed to provide continuity and maintain momentum to Museums and Schools objectives, while future museum education investment is developed. Those eligible are:
- ACE National Portfolio Organisations, Accredited and Working Towards Accreditation museums
- Museum partners who are current recipients of The Museums and Schools Programme grant
The deadline is 29 September. Follow this link for more information: Museum Learning and Engagement grants
Museum Transformation Fund Now Open
Another Arts Council England fund is the Museum Transformation Programme which is designed to enable Accredited Museums to address the longer-term challenges they face. It is also intended to support them to undertake the fundamental shift in their operational models required to stabilise their finances and continue to deliver for their audiences and communities. Grants of £50k to £1 million are available. Deadline is 30 September. Follow this link for further details: Museum Transformation Programme.
Garfield Weston Foundation
Finally, the Garfield Weston Foundation support a wide range of charities that make a positive difference, working in different sectors in the UK. These include welfare, youth, community, environment, education, health, arts, heritage, and faith. Their grants range from £1,000 to several million pounds, depending on each charity’s size and scope of work. Applications are open all year round. Follow this link for more details: Garfield Weston Foundation
#funding #grants #history #museums -
Autumn Grants Update for Eligible Industrial Heritage Museums & Sites
This autumn’s round of heritage grants include three available for industrial heritage museums (accredited or working towards accreditation) and other industrial sites.
Museum Learning and Engagement Grants
Museum Development is delivering the ‘Museum Learning and Engagement Grants’ on behalf of Arts Council England, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), and the Department for Education. This is a one-off, rapid-response small grant programme designed to give an opportunity for museums to undertake innovative pilot project projects to improve access to cultural learning opportunities for children and young people, particularly in underserved communities and areas of low engagement. The programme has been designed to provide continuity and maintain momentum to Museums and Schools objectives, while future museum education investment is developed. Those eligible are:
- ACE National Portfolio Organisations, Accredited and Working Towards Accreditation museums
- Museum partners who are current recipients of The Museums and Schools Programme grant
The deadline is 29 September. Follow this link for more information: Museum Learning and Engagement grants
Museum Transformation Fund Now Open
Another Arts Council England fund is the Museum Transformation Programme which is designed to enable Accredited Museums to address the longer-term challenges they face. It is also intended to support them to undertake the fundamental shift in their operational models required to stabilise their finances and continue to deliver for their audiences and communities. Grants of £50k to £1 million are available. Deadline is 30 September. Follow this link for further details: Museum Transformation Programme.
Garfield Weston Foundation
Finally, the Garfield Weston Foundation support a wide range of charities that make a positive difference, working in different sectors in the UK. These include welfare, youth, community, environment, education, health, arts, heritage, and faith. Their grants range from £1,000 to several million pounds, depending on each charity’s size and scope of work. Applications are open all year round. Follow this link for more details: Garfield Weston Foundation
#funding #grants #history #museums -
Autumn Grants Update for Eligible Industrial Heritage Museums & Sites
This autumn’s round of heritage grants include three available for industrial heritage museums (accredited or working towards accreditation) and other industrial sites.
Museum Learning and Engagement Grants
Museum Development is delivering the ‘Museum Learning and Engagement Grants’ on behalf of Arts Council England, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), and the Department for Education. This is a one-off, rapid-response small grant programme designed to give an opportunity for museums to undertake innovative pilot project projects to improve access to cultural learning opportunities for children and young people, particularly in underserved communities and areas of low engagement. The programme has been designed to provide continuity and maintain momentum to Museums and Schools objectives, while future museum education investment is developed. Those eligible are:
- ACE National Portfolio Organisations, Accredited and Working Towards Accreditation museums
- Museum partners who are current recipients of The Museums and Schools Programme grant
The deadline is 29 September. Follow this link for more information: Museum Learning and Engagement grants
Museum Transformation Fund Now Open
Another Arts Council England fund is the Museum Transformation Programme which is designed to enable Accredited Museums to address the longer-term challenges they face. It is also intended to support them to undertake the fundamental shift in their operational models required to stabilise their finances and continue to deliver for their audiences and communities. Grants of £50k to £1 million are available. Deadline is 30 September. Follow this link for further details: Museum Transformation Programme.
Garfield Weston Foundation
Finally, the Garfield Weston Foundation support a wide range of charities that make a positive difference, working in different sectors in the UK. These include welfare, youth, community, environment, education, health, arts, heritage, and faith. Their grants range from £1,000 to several million pounds, depending on each charity’s size and scope of work. Applications are open all year round. Follow this link for more details: Garfield Weston Foundation
#funding #grants #history #museums -
Autumn Grants Update for Eligible Industrial Heritage Museums & Sites
This autumn’s round of heritage grants include three available for industrial heritage museums (accredited or working towards accreditation) and other industrial sites.
Museum Learning and Engagement Grants
Museum Development is delivering the ‘Museum Learning and Engagement Grants’ on behalf of Arts Council England, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), and the Department for Education. This is a one-off, rapid-response small grant programme designed to give an opportunity for museums to undertake innovative pilot project projects to improve access to cultural learning opportunities for children and young people, particularly in underserved communities and areas of low engagement. The programme has been designed to provide continuity and maintain momentum to Museums and Schools objectives, while future museum education investment is developed. Those eligible are:
- ACE National Portfolio Organisations, Accredited and Working Towards Accreditation museums
- Museum partners who are current recipients of The Museums and Schools Programme grant
The deadline is 29 September. Follow this link for more information: Museum Learning and Engagement grants
Museum Transformation Fund Now Open
Another Arts Council England fund is the Museum Transformation Programme which is designed to enable Accredited Museums to address the longer-term challenges they face. It is also intended to support them to undertake the fundamental shift in their operational models required to stabilise their finances and continue to deliver for their audiences and communities. Grants of £50k to £1 million are available. Deadline is 30 September. Follow this link for further details: Museum Transformation Programme.
Garfield Weston Foundation
Finally, the Garfield Weston Foundation support a wide range of charities that make a positive difference, working in different sectors in the UK. These include welfare, youth, community, environment, education, health, arts, heritage, and faith. Their grants range from £1,000 to several million pounds, depending on each charity’s size and scope of work. Applications are open all year round. Follow this link for more details: Garfield Weston Foundation
#funding #grants #history #museums -
https://www.europesays.com/iran/283570/ Shafaq News..Healthcare in Iraq needs $6.84B in emergency funding #breaking #funding #HealthcareInIraqNeeds$684BInEmergencyFunding #HealthcareSector #Iraq #MedicalSupplies #Shortages
-
Mistral Raises 3 Billion Euros in Europe’s Largest Tech Round
Samsung leads Mistral's Series D at a 21 billion euro valuation, the biggest equity round ever completed by a European technology company.
-
Mistral Raises 3 Billion Euros in Europe’s Largest Tech Round
Samsung leads Mistral's Series D at a 21 billion euro valuation, the biggest equity round ever completed by a European technology company.
-
Mistral Raises 3 Billion Euros in Europe’s Largest Tech Round
Samsung leads Mistral's Series D at a 21 billion euro valuation, the biggest equity round ever completed by a European technology company.
-
Mistral Raises 3 Billion Euros in Europe’s Largest Tech Round
Samsung leads Mistral's Series D at a 21 billion euro valuation, the biggest equity round ever completed by a European technology company.
-
Mistral Raises 3 Billion Euros in Europe’s Largest Tech Round
Samsung leads Mistral's Series D at a 21 billion euro valuation, the biggest equity round ever completed by a European technology company.
-
🟢 PoliticalPressure | 5/10
🇩🇪 🇺🇦Political pressure on German Chancellor
Chancellor Friedrich Merz faces mounting political pressure following AfD's victory in Saxony-Anhalt elections. Meanwhile, there is growing economic pressure regarding continued funding for Ukraine. -
🟢 PoliticalPressure | 5/10
🇩🇪 🇺🇦Political pressure on German Chancellor
Chancellor Friedrich Merz faces mounting political pressure following AfD's victory in Saxony-Anhalt elections. Meanwhile, there is growing economic pressure regarding continued funding for Ukraine. -
🟢 PoliticalPressure | 5/10
🇩🇪 🇺🇦Political pressure on German Chancellor
Chancellor Friedrich Merz faces mounting political pressure following AfD's victory in Saxony-Anhalt elections. Meanwhile, there is growing economic pressure regarding continued funding for Ukraine. -
Spanish minister bids for top UN labour agency post amid US funding crisis
Spain has officially nominated its Labour Minister and Second Deputy Prime Minister, Yolanda Díaz, to run for Director-General of the International Labour Organization (ILO). If elected, Díaz would become the first woman to lead the Geneva-based UN agency in i…
-
Spanish minister bids for top UN labour agency post amid US funding crisis
Spain has officially nominated its Labour Minister and Second Deputy Prime Minister, Yolanda Díaz, to run for Director-General of the International Labour Organization (ILO). If elected, Díaz would become the first woman to lead the Geneva-based UN agency in i…
-
Spanish minister bids for top UN labour agency post amid US funding crisis
Spain has officially nominated its Labour Minister and Second Deputy Prime Minister, Yolanda Díaz, to run for Director-General of the International Labour Organization (ILO). If elected, Díaz would become the first woman to lead the Geneva-based UN agency in i…
-
Spanish minister bids for top UN labour agency post amid US funding crisis
Spain has officially nominated its Labour Minister and Second Deputy Prime Minister, Yolanda Díaz, to run for Director-General of the International Labour Organization (ILO). If elected, Díaz would become the first woman to lead the Geneva-based UN agency in i…
-
Spanish minister bids for top UN labour agency post amid US funding crisis
Spain has officially nominated its Labour Minister and Second Deputy Prime Minister, Yolanda Díaz, to run for Director-General of the International Labour Organization (ILO). If elected, Díaz would become the first woman to lead the Geneva-based UN agency in i…
-
RE: https://kolektiva.social/@DoomsdaysCW/117232339734925880
25 years ago I visited (as a prospective intern) a community mental health center in Salt Lake City, UT. I was blown away by what I learned: it seemed to be a financially solvent CMCH providing housing to almost all their clients who needed it. Most CMHCs are constantly struggling for cash, turning people away, and underpaying their staff who are a self-selecting group of -professionals willing to take a pay cut so they can serve the people who need to be helped.
The director told us that, several years earlier, they had hired a finance person who convinced the execs to take a risk: instead of renting apartments as needed for their unhoused clients, they bought some units. They saved money pretty quickly (possibly due to cultural/geographic factors difficult to replicate elsewhere; IDK) and bought more housing units. By the time I visited they owned several apartment buildings. They rented some of the apartments at market rates, which allowed them to give sliding-fee rents to clients who needed housing; apparently, plenty of clients got free housing. After a few years, he said, they were housing nearly all clients who needed it, and of course the treatment success rates went up, because not having to worry about housing is great for mental health, keeping jobs, childcare, etc. Many clients' incomes grew, so they started paying more rent and increasing the organization's ability to provide services, including more housing.
Someone in our applicant group asked something like "do you have some buildings for clients and others for non-client residents?" He said no, they were mixed, and (a) the non-client residents, who knew that many of their neighbors were struggling with mental health and substance use, seemed quite happy to live in the units; they were priced affordably in the market, for one thing; (b) the clients benefited by living in "normal housing" instead of being sequestered in "low-income" or "mentally ill" apartment complexes. Many people reportedly formed lasting friendships and the clients seemed to do better, overall, with mixed-income neighbors.
I think (? long time ago, hazy memory) he said they had become one of the larger real estate owners in the Salt Lake Valley, and the CMHC had a significant investment fund that they used for services most CMHCs can't afford.
I only know his spiel, so I only know the PR from 25 years ago (approximately 2003), but for a grad student working in a standard underfunded CMHC, damn was that ever impressive. I've often wondered (a) how much of the spiel was PR vs reality, and (b) how realistic this would be for other CMHCs. If even half of it was non-bullshit, it's deeply impressive.
I didn't get the SLC placement, sadly. The CMHC I worked at right then, in Columbus, Ohio, had two separate CEOs led out of the main offices in handcuffs within two years, allegedly for embezzling and other stuff. We were not the same.
Edit: conciseness
-
RE: https://kolektiva.social/@DoomsdaysCW/117232339734925880
25 years ago I visited (as a prospective intern) a community mental health center in Salt Lake City, UT. I was blown away by what I learned: it seemed to be a financially solvent CMCH providing housing to almost all their clients who needed it. Most CMHCs are constantly struggling for cash, turning people away, and underpaying their staff who are a self-selecting group of -professionals willing to take a pay cut so they can serve the people who need to be helped.
The director told us that, several years earlier, they had hired a finance person who convinced the execs to take a risk: instead of renting apartments as needed for their unhoused clients, they bought some units. They saved money pretty quickly (possibly due to cultural/geographic factors difficult to replicate elsewhere; IDK) and bought more housing units. By the time I visited they owned several apartment buildings. They rented some of the apartments at market rates, which allowed them to give sliding-fee rents to clients who needed housing; apparently, plenty of clients got free housing. After a few years, he said, they were housing nearly all clients who needed it, and of course the treatment success rates went up, because not having to worry about housing is great for mental health, keeping jobs, childcare, etc. Many clients' incomes grew, so they started paying more rent and increasing the organization's ability to provide services, including more housing.
Someone in our applicant group asked something like "do you have some buildings for clients and others for non-client residents?" He said no, they were mixed, and (a) the non-client residents, who knew that many of their neighbors were struggling with mental health and substance use, seemed quite happy to live in the units; they were priced affordably in the market, for one thing; (b) the clients benefited by living in "normal housing" instead of being sequestered in "low-income" or "mentally ill" apartment complexes. Many people reportedly formed lasting friendships and the clients seemed to do better, overall, with mixed-income neighbors.
I think (? long time ago, hazy memory) he said they had become one of the larger real estate owners in the Salt Lake Valley, and the CMHC had a significant investment fund that they used for services most CMHCs can't afford.
I only know his spiel, so I only know the PR from 25 years ago (approximately 2003), but for a grad student working in a standard underfunded CMHC, damn was that ever impressive. I've often wondered (a) how much of the spiel was PR vs reality, and (b) how realistic this would be for other CMHCs. If even half of it was non-bullshit, it's deeply impressive.
I didn't get the SLC placement, sadly. The CMHC I worked at right then, in Columbus, Ohio, had two separate CEOs led out of the main offices in handcuffs within two years, allegedly for embezzling and other stuff. We were not the same.
Edit: conciseness
-
RE: https://kolektiva.social/@DoomsdaysCW/117232339734925880
25 years ago I visited (as a prospective intern) a community mental health center in Salt Lake City, UT. I was blown away by what I learned: it seemed to be a financially solvent CMCH providing housing to almost all their clients who needed it. Most CMHCs are constantly struggling for cash, turning people away, and underpaying their staff who are a self-selecting group of -professionals willing to take a pay cut so they can serve the people who need to be helped.
The director told us that, several years earlier, they had hired a finance person who convinced the execs to take a risk: instead of renting apartments as needed for their unhoused clients, they bought some units. They saved money pretty quickly (possibly due to cultural/geographic factors difficult to replicate elsewhere; IDK) and bought more housing units. By the time I visited they owned several apartment buildings. They rented some of the apartments at market rates, which allowed them to give sliding-fee rents to clients who needed housing; apparently, plenty of clients got free housing. After a few years, he said, they were housing nearly all clients who needed it, and of course the treatment success rates went up, because not having to worry about housing is great for mental health, keeping jobs, childcare, etc. Many clients' incomes grew, so they started paying more rent and increasing the organization's ability to provide services, including more housing.
Someone in our applicant group asked something like "do you have some buildings for clients and others for non-client residents?" He said no, they were mixed, and (a) the non-client residents, who knew that many of their neighbors were struggling with mental health and substance use, seemed quite happy to live in the units; they were priced affordably in the market, for one thing; (b) the clients benefited by living in "normal housing" instead of being sequestered in "low-income" or "mentally ill" apartment complexes. Many people reportedly formed lasting friendships and the clients seemed to do better, overall, with mixed-income neighbors.
I think (? long time ago, hazy memory) he said they had become one of the larger real estate owners in the Salt Lake Valley, and the CMHC had a significant investment fund that they used for services most CMHCs can't afford.
I only know his spiel, so I only know the PR from 25 years ago (approximately 2003), but for a grad student working in a standard underfunded CMHC, damn was that ever impressive. I've often wondered (a) how much of the spiel was PR vs reality, and (b) how realistic this would be for other CMHCs. If even half of it was non-bullshit, it's deeply impressive.
I didn't get the SLC placement, sadly. The CMHC I worked at right then, in Columbus, Ohio, had two separate CEOs led out of the main offices in handcuffs within two years, allegedly for embezzling and other stuff. We were not the same.
Edit: conciseness
-
RE: https://kolektiva.social/@DoomsdaysCW/117232339734925880
25 years ago I visited (as a prospective intern) a community mental health center in Salt Lake City, UT. I was blown away by what I learned: it seemed to be a financially solvent CMCH providing housing to almost all their clients who needed it. Most CMHCs are constantly struggling for cash, turning people away, and underpaying their staff who are a self-selecting group of -professionals willing to take a pay cut so they can serve the people who need to be helped.
The director told us that, several years earlier, they had hired a finance person who convinced the execs to take a risk: instead of renting apartments as needed for their unhoused clients, they bought some units. They saved money pretty quickly (possibly due to cultural/geographic factors difficult to replicate elsewhere; IDK) and bought more housing units. By the time I visited they owned several apartment buildings. They rented some of the apartments at market rates, which allowed them to give sliding-fee rents to clients who needed housing; apparently, plenty of clients got free housing. After a few years, he said, they were housing nearly all clients who needed it, and of course the treatment success rates went up, because not having to worry about housing is great for mental health, keeping jobs, childcare, etc. Many clients' incomes grew, so they started paying more rent and increasing the organization's ability to provide services, including more housing.
Someone in our applicant group asked something like "do you have some buildings for clients and others for non-client residents?" He said no, they were mixed, and (a) the non-client residents, who knew that many of their neighbors were struggling with mental health and substance use, seemed quite happy to live in the units; they were priced affordably in the market, for one thing; (b) the clients benefited by living in "normal housing" instead of being sequestered in "low-income" or "mentally ill" apartment complexes. Many people reportedly formed lasting friendships and the clients seemed to do better, overall, with mixed-income neighbors.
I think (? long time ago, hazy memory) he said they had become one of the larger real estate owners in the Salt Lake Valley, and the CMHC had a significant investment fund that they used for services most CMHCs can't afford.
I only know his spiel, so I only know the PR from 25 years ago (approximately 2003), but for a grad student working in a standard underfunded CMHC, damn was that ever impressive. I've often wondered (a) how much of the spiel was PR vs reality, and (b) how realistic this would be for other CMHCs. If even half of it was non-bullshit, it's deeply impressive.
I didn't get the SLC placement, sadly. The CMHC I worked at right then, in Columbus, Ohio, had two separate CEOs led out of the main offices in handcuffs within two years, allegedly for embezzling and other stuff. We were not the same.
Edit: conciseness
-
RE: https://kolektiva.social/@DoomsdaysCW/117232339734925880
25 years ago I visited (as a prospective intern) a community mental health center in Salt Lake City, UT. I was blown away by what I learned: it seemed to be a financially solvent CMCH providing housing to almost all their clients who needed it. Most CMHCs are constantly struggling for cash, turning people away, and underpaying their staff who are a self-selecting group of -professionals willing to take a pay cut so they can serve the people who need to be helped.
The director told us that, several years earlier, they had hired a finance person who convinced the execs to take a risk: instead of renting apartments as needed for their unhoused clients, they bought some units. They saved money pretty quickly (possibly due to cultural/geographic factors difficult to replicate elsewhere; IDK) and bought more housing units. By the time I visited they owned several apartment buildings. They rented some of the apartments at market rates, which allowed them to give sliding-fee rents to clients who needed housing; apparently, plenty of clients got free housing. After a few years, he said, they were housing nearly all clients who needed it, and of course the treatment success rates went up, because not having to worry about housing is great for mental health, keeping jobs, childcare, etc. Many clients' incomes grew, so they started paying more rent and increasing the organization's ability to provide services, including more housing.
Someone in our applicant group asked something like "do you have some buildings for clients and others for non-client residents?" He said no, they were mixed, and (a) the non-client residents, who knew that many of their neighbors were struggling with mental health and substance use, seemed quite happy to live in the units; they were priced affordably in the market, for one thing; (b) the clients benefited by living in "normal housing" instead of being sequestered in "low-income" or "mentally ill" apartment complexes. Many people reportedly formed lasting friendships and the clients seemed to do better, overall, with mixed-income neighbors.
I think (? long time ago, hazy memory) he said they had become one of the larger real estate owners in the Salt Lake Valley, and the CMHC had a significant investment fund that they used for services most CMHCs can't afford.
I only know his spiel, so I only know the PR from 25 years ago (approximately 2003), but for a grad student working in a standard underfunded CMHC, damn was that ever impressive. I've often wondered (a) how much of the spiel was PR vs reality, and (b) how realistic this would be for other CMHCs. If even half of it was non-bullshit, it's deeply impressive.
I didn't get the SLC placement, sadly. The CMHC I worked at right then, in Columbus, Ohio, had two separate CEOs led out of the main offices in handcuffs within two years, allegedly for embezzling and other stuff. We were not the same.
Edit: conciseness
-
https://www.europesays.com/people/219057/ Schumer: Funding on the way for aging infrastructure at former Plattsburgh Air Force base #ChuckSchumer #funding #Infrastructure #NewYork #PlattsburghAirForceBase #PLATTSBURGHTOWN #schumer #wcax
-
https://www.europesays.com/videos/89805/ Schools closing for A66 funerals ‘obscene’ – Kemi Badenoch | ITV News Tyne Tees #A66 #Acklam #ClevelandPolice #Conservative #crash #DavidSkaith #funding #funeral #GreatNorthRun #itv #ItvNews #ITVNewsInFull #KemiBadenoch #Labour #levy #LucyPowell #Middlesbrough #Newcastle #NorthYorkshire #policing #politics #PrideOfBritain #racing #running #Scarborough #SouthBank #SouthShields #teesside #TheoRae #TouristTax
-
New study: "Shortly after major policy changes to US science funding began in early 2025, we surveyed 916 young biomedical scientists – PhD students and postdoctoral researchers – about their career intentions and expectations…Barely half of respondents now say they are likely to remain in academia, down 22% from how they felt six months earlier. The fraction likely to stay in the United States fell by 21%."
https://www.nber.org/papers/w35330Also see the summary in the Harvard Gazette.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2026/09/survey-of-young-researchers-raises-concerns-over-future-of-science-in-u-s/#DefendResearch #ECR #Funding #Trump #TrumpVResearch #USPol #USPolitics
-
New study: "Shortly after major policy changes to US science funding began in early 2025, we surveyed 916 young biomedical scientists – PhD students and postdoctoral researchers – about their career intentions and expectations…Barely half of respondents now say they are likely to remain in academia, down 22% from how they felt six months earlier. The fraction likely to stay in the United States fell by 21%."
https://www.nber.org/papers/w35330Also see the summary in the Harvard Gazette.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2026/09/survey-of-young-researchers-raises-concerns-over-future-of-science-in-u-s/#DefendResearch #ECR #Funding #Trump #TrumpVResearch #USPol #USPolitics
-
New study: "Shortly after major policy changes to US science funding began in early 2025, we surveyed 916 young biomedical scientists – PhD students and postdoctoral researchers – about their career intentions and expectations…Barely half of respondents now say they are likely to remain in academia, down 22% from how they felt six months earlier. The fraction likely to stay in the United States fell by 21%."
https://www.nber.org/papers/w35330Also see the summary in the Harvard Gazette.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2026/09/survey-of-young-researchers-raises-concerns-over-future-of-science-in-u-s/#DefendResearch #ECR #Funding #Trump #TrumpVResearch #USPol #USPolitics
-
New study: "Shortly after major policy changes to US science funding began in early 2025, we surveyed 916 young biomedical scientists – PhD students and postdoctoral researchers – about their career intentions and expectations…Barely half of respondents now say they are likely to remain in academia, down 22% from how they felt six months earlier. The fraction likely to stay in the United States fell by 21%."
https://www.nber.org/papers/w35330Also see the summary in the Harvard Gazette.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2026/09/survey-of-young-researchers-raises-concerns-over-future-of-science-in-u-s/#DefendResearch #ECR #Funding #Trump #TrumpVResearch #USPol #USPolitics
-
New study: "Shortly after major policy changes to US science funding began in early 2025, we surveyed 916 young biomedical scientists – PhD students and postdoctoral researchers – about their career intentions and expectations…Barely half of respondents now say they are likely to remain in academia, down 22% from how they felt six months earlier. The fraction likely to stay in the United States fell by 21%."
https://www.nber.org/papers/w35330Also see the summary in the Harvard Gazette.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2026/09/survey-of-young-researchers-raises-concerns-over-future-of-science-in-u-s/#DefendResearch #ECR #Funding #Trump #TrumpVResearch #USPol #USPolitics
-
The "Multiple Long-Term Conditions (MLTC) #PhD Programme for Health Professionals" will be selecting its 2027 cohort soon!
Programme information
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/The programme centres on fundamentals of MLTCs, combined mental and physical MLTCs, and prevention & management.
Projects
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/researchprojects/Our project focuses on defining clinically meaningful and sustainable outcomes for MLTCs
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/researchprojects/glasgow_projects/uofg10/#NCD #Multimorbidity #Wellcome #Nursing #Psychology #Funding #HRQL
-
The "Multiple Long-Term Conditions (MLTC) #PhD Programme for Health Professionals" will be selecting its 2027 cohort soon!
Programme information
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/The programme centres on fundamentals of MLTCs, combined mental and physical MLTCs, and prevention & management.
Projects
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/researchprojects/Our project focuses on defining clinically meaningful and sustainable outcomes for MLTCs
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/researchprojects/glasgow_projects/uofg10/#NCD #Multimorbidity #Wellcome #Nursing #Psychology #Funding #HRQL
-
The "Multiple Long-Term Conditions (MLTC) #PhD Programme for Health Professionals" will be selecting its 2027 cohort soon!
Programme information
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/The programme centres on fundamentals of MLTCs, combined mental and physical MLTCs, and prevention & management.
Projects
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/researchprojects/Our project focuses on defining clinically meaningful and sustainable outcomes for MLTCs
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/researchprojects/glasgow_projects/uofg10/#NCD #Multimorbidity #Wellcome #Nursing #Psychology #Funding #HRQL
-
The "Multiple Long-Term Conditions (MLTC) #PhD Programme for Health Professionals" will be selecting its 2027 cohort soon!
Programme information
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/The programme centres on fundamentals of MLTCs, combined mental and physical MLTCs, and prevention & management.
Projects
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/researchprojects/Our project focuses on defining clinically meaningful and sustainable outcomes for MLTCs
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/researchprojects/glasgow_projects/uofg10/#NCD #Multimorbidity #Wellcome #Nursing #Psychology #Funding #HRQL
-
The "Multiple Long-Term Conditions (MLTC) #PhD Programme for Health Professionals" will be selecting its 2027 cohort soon!
Programme information
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/The programme centres on fundamentals of MLTCs, combined mental and physical MLTCs, and prevention & management.
Projects
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/researchprojects/Our project focuses on defining clinically meaningful and sustainable outcomes for MLTCs
https://www.gla.ac.uk/postgraduate/doctoraltraining/mltc-phd/researchprojects/glasgow_projects/uofg10/#NCD #Multimorbidity #Wellcome #Nursing #Psychology #Funding #HRQL
-
8月27日に、東京応化科学技術振興財団が『2027年度の「研究費の助成」及び「国際交流助成」並びに「研究交流促進助成」の募集のお知らせ』を発表。募集期間は2027年1月4日(月)-1月15日(金)。研究費の助成と国際交流助成は指定の化学系学会で推薦募集。指定学会: エレクトロニクス実装学会、応用物理学会、高分子学会、電気化学会、日本化学会、日本セラミックス協会、光化学協会、表面技術協会、有機合成化学協会。詳細は https://www.tok-foundation.or.jp/topics/20260827 に。
#TOKFoundation #Funding #Chemistry