#studydesign — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #studydesign, aggregated by home.social.
-
Another #PeerReview done.
Manuscript c4,000 words
Review c2,700 words
5hrsPaper in a key area of my methodological work, so it was really interesting. But I really needed to get stuck in.
Two collaboration projects on the design and reporting of #RCTs that might be useful for others:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37982521/
presents 19 factors to aid trial design, and the DELTA2 Guidance specifying a target difference and reporting the #SampleSize calculation for RCTs
https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-2884-0 -
Which #SampleSize to use in your pilot or feasibility trial?
Well, you won't find the answer in this review of studies in #ISRCTN (2013 to 2020)
https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01416-wBut it is a good intro into the topic, and with 57% not reaching their target sample size, they may interestingly not provide the information they were designed to offer!
-
Thank you to #HealthPsychology and Behavioral Medicine @unibern for writing a post about the recent Summer Course 2025, “Contemporary Evaluation of Interventions: Mobile, Digital, and Pragmatic”
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gesundheitspsychologie-und-verhaltensmedizin-gpv-unibe_gpv-unibe-mhealth-activity-7340302148112408577-4_JW/ -
Thank you to #HealthPsychology and Behavioral Medicine @unibern for writing a post about the recent Summer Course 2025, “Contemporary Evaluation of Interventions: Mobile, Digital, and Pragmatic”
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gesundheitspsychologie-und-verhaltensmedizin-gpv-unibe_gpv-unibe-mhealth-activity-7340302148112408577-4_JW/ -
Thank you to #HealthPsychology and Behavioral Medicine @unibern for writing a post about the recent Summer Course 2025, “Contemporary Evaluation of Interventions: Mobile, Digital, and Pragmatic”
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gesundheitspsychologie-und-verhaltensmedizin-gpv-unibe_gpv-unibe-mhealth-activity-7340302148112408577-4_JW/ -
Thank you to #HealthPsychology and Behavioral Medicine @unibern for writing a post about the recent Summer Course 2025, “Contemporary Evaluation of Interventions: Mobile, Digital, and Pragmatic”
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gesundheitspsychologie-und-verhaltensmedizin-gpv-unibe_gpv-unibe-mhealth-activity-7340302148112408577-4_JW/ -
Thank you to #HealthPsychology and Behavioral Medicine @unibern for writing a post about the recent Summer Course 2025, “Contemporary Evaluation of Interventions: Mobile, Digital, and Pragmatic”
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gesundheitspsychologie-und-verhaltensmedizin-gpv-unibe_gpv-unibe-mhealth-activity-7340302148112408577-4_JW/ -
A well-justified epistemological foundation is a key requirement for a #DelphiStudy:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921722000769The team argues that #ReportingGuidelines encourage researchers to reflect on and disclose key assumptions and methodological choices in such studies.
-
Co-developed at #DundeeUni and #SFU
"A Toolkit for Building a Collective of Older Adult Researchers"
https://www.sfu.ca/starinstitute/about/institute-activities/research-project--coar.html
(COAR)"A practical resource for engaging older adults as active partners in community-based research"
-
Mirjam Stieger (Lucerne Uni) and I are invited to present
"Contemporary #Evaluation of Interventions: Mobile, Digital, and Pragmatic"
at @unibern
https://www.bbs.unibe.ch/training/summer_course/index_eng.htmlThis is the annual Summer Course of the Doctoral Program Brain and Behavioral Sciences, and comprises a mixture of keynotes, masterclasses, hidden curriculum etc.
I am very much looking forward to it, and also very honoured to be invited once again to Bern to train #ECRs!
-
Tutorial paper illustrating how to develop planned contrasts (as an alternative to #PostHoc comparisons) in #Rstats, including empirical examples with reproducible data:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/25152459241293110 -
https://psychedelictherapypalmsprings.com/feed/dsm-psychiatric-diagnosis-meaningless-study-says #dsm #psychiatry #dsm5 #trauma #ptsd #depression #anxiety #mentalhealth https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165178119309114?via%3Dihub #fda #mdma #studydesign #heterogeneity #litreview
-
One member of the FDA advisory committee, and non-voting, industry rep worked on Spravato for Jansen. Her colleague, a psychiatrist was MAPS-trained and works with ketamine currently. Let’s talk conflict of interests. What #psychiatricmedicines have been tested against the gold standard of cognitive behavioral therapy? Which of the providers in the #mdmaassistedtherapy trials or advisory meeting actually practice CBT? #studydesign #litreview #contactus
-
Call for #GlobalHealth #GlobalMentalHealth researchers interested in #Multimorbidity:
9th GACD Funding Call – Management of Multiple Long-Term Conditions
https://www.gacd.org/funding/current-call-for-applications/management-of-multiple-long-term-conditions
🗓️ 15.05. (first stage)The common call document [pdf https://www.gacd.org/perch/resources/admin/ninth-gacd-call-text-mltc-wp-v1-5.pdf] lists a range of topics such as #StudyDesign, health #equity, stakeholder engagement and knowledge sharing it has a specific section on #OutcomeMeasures that explicitly refers to our COSMOS work
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301589v1 -
I'll be offering an introduction to #simulation methods to determine #SampleSize-s for clustered / nested studies.
Apparently another popular session at #RMeF23 🙇
One of the classics that got me into this area is Ukoumunne's
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sim.1330I was always interested in how to straddle the overlap between observational #TherapistEffect studies* and #RCTs in this area.
* eg., https://rdcu.be/dqi20
-
One of the most problematic areas in the submission we get and papers I review are the sections on #SampleSize justifications.
See for example @lakens' excellent paper on the topic:
https://psyarxiv.com/9d3yf/
It now comes with a process guide in a #ShinyApp, which is an excellent support:
https://shiny.ieis.tue.nl/sample_size_justification/
#RstatsFor #HRQL researchers:
https://rdcu.be/dnfO4And many people teach this stuff, e.g., ☺️
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335813329_Estimating_sample_sizes_based_on_required_precision_for_surveys_and_epidemiological_research#StudyDesign #NightshiftEditor
[edit: typo in hashtag] -
A #SysReview from the "#ResponseShift – in Sync Working Group" analysed 150 studies
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-023-03495-xApart from the interest in the psychological phenomenon, the relative size of such effects compared to intervention effects (e.g., in #RCT https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-022-00510-6) is very important for #StudyDesign in #HRQL research (see also https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03347-8).
Therefore an interesting descriptive finding: it was possible only for 105 of these studies to calculate #EffectSize-s.
-
While not expressing disagreement or agreement with the #study's #conclusions, the #experiment design included some features that make it difficult to #generalize from.
For example, they eliminated those homeless with a history of #substance #abuse. That by itself makes the #headline claims a bit suspect, or at least not clearly #supported by evidence.
-
While not expressing disagreement or agreement with the #study's #conclusions, the #experiment design included some features that make it difficult to #generalize from.
For example, they eliminated those homeless with a history of #substance #abuse. That by itself makes the #headline claims a bit suspect, or at least not clearly #supported by evidence.
-
While not expressing disagreement or agreement with the #study's #conclusions, the #experiment design included some features that make it difficult to #generalize from.
For example, they eliminated those homeless with a history of #substance #abuse. That by itself makes the #headline claims a bit suspect, or at least not clearly #supported by evidence.
-
While not expressing disagreement or agreement with the #study's #conclusions, the #experiment design included some features that make it difficult to #generalize from.
For example, they eliminated those homeless with a history of #substance #abuse. That by itself makes the #headline claims a bit suspect, or at least not clearly #supported by evidence.
-
While not expressing disagreement or agreement with the #study's #conclusions, the #experiment design included some features that make it difficult to #generalize from.
For example, they eliminated those homeless with a history of #substance #abuse. That by itself makes the #headline claims a bit suspect, or at least not clearly #supported by evidence.
-
The "Reviewer's guide to #QuantitativeMethods" provides a concise summary of what to learn about and how to plan & report studies employing 31 (2nd ed. apparently 35) methods: https://www.routledge.com/The-Reviewers-Guide-to-Quantitative-Methods-in-the-Social-Sciences/Hancock-Stapleton-Mueller/p/book/9781138800137
Since it is a book, it will be difficult for many to get access. Does anyone know whether at least the checklists have been published somewhere #OpenAccess?
And is there a #QualitativeMethods version?#ResearchMethods #PeerReview #StudyDesign #ResearchWriting #AcademicEditing #SocialSciences
-
The "Reviewer's guide to #QuantitativeMethods" provides a concise summary of what to learn about and how to plan & report studies employing 31 (2nd ed. apparently 35) methods: https://www.routledge.com/The-Reviewers-Guide-to-Quantitative-Methods-in-the-Social-Sciences/Hancock-Stapleton-Mueller/p/book/9781138800137
Since it is a book, it will be difficult for many to get access. Does anyone know whether at least the checklists have been published somewhere #OpenAccess?
And is there a #QualitativeMethods version?#ResearchMethods #PeerReview #StudyDesign #ResearchWriting #AcademicEditing #SocialSciences
-
The "Reviewer's guide to #QuantitativeMethods" provides a concise summary of what to learn about and how to plan & report studies employing 31 (2nd ed. apparently 35) methods: https://www.routledge.com/The-Reviewers-Guide-to-Quantitative-Methods-in-the-Social-Sciences/Hancock-Stapleton-Mueller/p/book/9781138800137
Since it is a book, it will be difficult for many to get access. Does anyone know whether at least the checklists have been published somewhere #OpenAccess?
And is there a #QualitativeMethods version?#ResearchMethods #PeerReview #StudyDesign #ResearchWriting #AcademicEditing #SocialSciences