#nightshifteditor — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #nightshifteditor, aggregated by home.social.
-
Editorial handover at Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric #Epidemiology. Outgoing Craig Morgan's editorial about "Time for Change"
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-026-03166-5"[...] scientific journals are the products, and therefore the intellectual property, of scientific communities."
"There are many calls for the concept of statistical significance to be retired. I regret not implementing this in SPPE."
All the best to Uli Reininghaus and the new team!
-
"In retrospect, these strategies were a form of authorial self-preservation."
Autoethnography of the rhetorical and emotional dimensions of writing about study limitations:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/17470161251363704The paper draws on 8 manuscripts, 17 drafts, 22 #PeerReview by the author, journal entries, and email exchanges.
Interesting reflections & it illustrates the challenges and questions, especially if one has not written many manuscripts, yet.
-
#1/
Excellent talk by Kevin Weinfurt in #Plenary1 discussing multiple types of measures (go also to #Plenary4 for that!), increased use of high-intensity longitudinal data, and generative AI for assessments.Start reading his work:
https://rdcu.be/dWXSz
#HRQL #Psychometrics#2/
Not sure this is what the #ISOQOL_NewInvestigators wanted when asking me to talk about advice for manuscript writing, but this is the slide people talked to me about 👇
#NightshiftEditor #ScientificPublishing -
#1/ First day of #ISOQOL started with an interesting symposium on progress when optimizing the collection of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials.
Part of the discussion were desirable changes to the publication system when publishing expert consensus and guidance documents:
1) What does #PeerReview for such a document look like?
2) Static journal publications may not be the best format for such documents.
Both seem solvable, no?
#HTD