#nightshifteditor — Public Fediverse posts

Editorial handover at Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric #Epidemiology. Outgoing Craig Morgan's editorial about "Time for Change"
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-026-03166-5

"[...] scientific journals are the products, and therefore the intellectual property, of scientific communities."

"There are many calls for the concept of statistical significance to be retired. I regret not implementing this in SPPE."

All the best to Uli Reininghaus and the new team!

#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

Editorial handover at Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric #Epidemiology. Outgoing Craig Morgan's editorial about "Time for Change"
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-026-03166-5

"[...] scientific journals are the products, and therefore the intellectual property, of scientific communities."

"There are many calls for the concept of statistical significance to be retired. I regret not implementing this in SPPE."

All the best to Uli Reininghaus and the new team!

#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

Editorial handover at Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric #Epidemiology. Outgoing Craig Morgan's editorial about "Time for Change"
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-026-03166-5

"[...] scientific journals are the products, and therefore the intellectual property, of scientific communities."

"There are many calls for the concept of statistical significance to be retired. I regret not implementing this in SPPE."

All the best to Uli Reininghaus and the new team!

#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

Editorial handover at Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric #Epidemiology. Outgoing Craig Morgan's editorial about "Time for Change"
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-026-03166-5

"[...] scientific journals are the products, and therefore the intellectual property, of scientific communities."

"There are many calls for the concept of statistical significance to be retired. I regret not implementing this in SPPE."

All the best to Uli Reininghaus and the new team!

#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

Editorial handover at Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric #Epidemiology. Outgoing Craig Morgan's editorial about "Time for Change"
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-026-03166-5

"[...] scientific journals are the products, and therefore the intellectual property, of scientific communities."

"There are many calls for the concept of statistical significance to be retired. I regret not implementing this in SPPE."

All the best to Uli Reininghaus and the new team!

#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

Is it acceptable as a journal to set a standard threshold for acceptable levels of text overlap in submissions?

#COPE very clear and brief: NO. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/determining-acceptable-levels-plagiarismduplication

#ResearchIntegrity #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

Is it acceptable as a journal to set a standard threshold for acceptable levels of text overlap in submissions?

#COPE very clear and brief: NO. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/determining-acceptable-levels-plagiarismduplication

#ResearchIntegrity #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

Is it acceptable as a journal to set a standard threshold for acceptable levels of text overlap in submissions?

#COPE very clear and brief: NO. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/determining-acceptable-levels-plagiarismduplication

#ResearchIntegrity #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

Is it acceptable as a journal to set a standard threshold for acceptable levels of text overlap in submissions?

#COPE very clear and brief: NO. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/determining-acceptable-levels-plagiarismduplication

#ResearchIntegrity #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

Is it acceptable as a journal to set a standard threshold for acceptable levels of text overlap in submissions?

#COPE very clear and brief: NO. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/determining-acceptable-levels-plagiarismduplication

#ResearchIntegrity #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

"In retrospect, these strategies were a form of authorial self-preservation."

Autoethnography of the rhetorical and emotional dimensions of writing about study limitations:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/17470161251363704

The paper draws on 8 manuscripts, 17 drafts, 22 #PeerReview by the author, journal entries, and email exchanges.

Interesting reflections & it illustrates the challenges and questions, especially if one has not written many manuscripts, yet.

#AcademicChatter #AcademicWriting #NightshiftEditor #ECRs

"In retrospect, these strategies were a form of authorial self-preservation."

Autoethnography of the rhetorical and emotional dimensions of writing about study limitations:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/17470161251363704

The paper draws on 8 manuscripts, 17 drafts, 22 #PeerReview by the author, journal entries, and email exchanges.

Interesting reflections & it illustrates the challenges and questions, especially if one has not written many manuscripts, yet.

#AcademicChatter #AcademicWriting #NightshiftEditor #ECRs

"In retrospect, these strategies were a form of authorial self-preservation."

Autoethnography of the rhetorical and emotional dimensions of writing about study limitations:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/17470161251363704

The paper draws on 8 manuscripts, 17 drafts, 22 #PeerReview by the author, journal entries, and email exchanges.

Interesting reflections & it illustrates the challenges and questions, especially if one has not written many manuscripts, yet.

#AcademicChatter #AcademicWriting #NightshiftEditor #ECRs

"In retrospect, these strategies were a form of authorial self-preservation."

Autoethnography of the rhetorical and emotional dimensions of writing about study limitations:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/17470161251363704

The paper draws on 8 manuscripts, 17 drafts, 22 #PeerReview by the author, journal entries, and email exchanges.

Interesting reflections & it illustrates the challenges and questions, especially if one has not written many manuscripts, yet.

#AcademicChatter #AcademicWriting #NightshiftEditor #ECRs

"In retrospect, these strategies were a form of authorial self-preservation."

Autoethnography of the rhetorical and emotional dimensions of writing about study limitations:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/17470161251363704

The paper draws on 8 manuscripts, 17 drafts, 22 #PeerReview by the author, journal entries, and email exchanges.

Interesting reflections & it illustrates the challenges and questions, especially if one has not written many manuscripts, yet.

#AcademicChatter #AcademicWriting #NightshiftEditor #ECRs

. @alexh talked about letters rejecting #PeerReview requests for specific publishers, e.g., here on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexholcombe_declining-another-review-request-from-an-share-7426356814121689088-N0Kz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAD0JHkBcK9LoDUuScfOpFwbt_UMALGWLV8

@priyasilverstein discussed the role of editors in #OpenScience, and offered the example of the guide for #SocialScience journal editors on easing into #OpenScience
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5
#JEDI #JournalEditing #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

. @alexh talked about letters rejecting #PeerReview requests for specific publishers, e.g., here on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexholcombe_declining-another-review-request-from-an-share-7426356814121689088-N0Kz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAD0JHkBcK9LoDUuScfOpFwbt_UMALGWLV8

@priyasilverstein discussed the role of editors in #OpenScience, and offered the example of the guide for #SocialScience journal editors on easing into #OpenScience
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5
#JEDI #JournalEditing #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

. @alexh talked about letters rejecting #PeerReview requests for specific publishers, e.g., here on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexholcombe_declining-another-review-request-from-an-share-7426356814121689088-N0Kz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAD0JHkBcK9LoDUuScfOpFwbt_UMALGWLV8

@priyasilverstein discussed the role of editors in #OpenScience, and offered the example of the guide for #SocialScience journal editors on easing into #OpenScience
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5
#JEDI #JournalEditing #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

. @alexh talked about letters rejecting #PeerReview requests for specific publishers, e.g., here on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexholcombe_declining-another-review-request-from-an-share-7426356814121689088-N0Kz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAD0JHkBcK9LoDUuScfOpFwbt_UMALGWLV8

@priyasilverstein discussed the role of editors in #OpenScience, and offered the example of the guide for #SocialScience journal editors on easing into #OpenScience
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5
#JEDI #JournalEditing #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

. @alexh talked about letters rejecting #PeerReview requests for specific publishers, e.g., here on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexholcombe_declining-another-review-request-from-an-share-7426356814121689088-N0Kz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAD0JHkBcK9LoDUuScfOpFwbt_UMALGWLV8

@priyasilverstein discussed the role of editors in #OpenScience, and offered the example of the guide for #SocialScience journal editors on easing into #OpenScience
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5
#JEDI #JournalEditing #AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor

RE: https://fediscience.org/@alexh/116518145538497476

This was really interesting 👏

Some slides from the event have been posted here:
https://zenodo.org/communities/muecos/records?q=&l=list&p=1&s=10&sort=newest

And some of the resources and topics that came up 👇

The #ECR reviewer's platform aims to empower junior reviewers and equip #ECRs with the necessary skills to conduct methodologically rigorous reviews
ecr-reviewers.gitlab.io/guide/
#PostGraduate #PGR

#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity

RE: https://fediscience.org/@alexh/116518145538497476

This was really interesting 👏

Some slides from the event have been posted here:
https://zenodo.org/communities/muecos/records?q=&l=list&p=1&s=10&sort=newest

And some of the resources and topics that came up 👇

The #ECR reviewer's platform aims to empower junior reviewers and equip #ECRs with the necessary skills to conduct methodologically rigorous reviews
ecr-reviewers.gitlab.io/guide/
#PostGraduate #PGR

#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity

RE: https://fediscience.org/@alexh/116518145538497476

This was really interesting 👏

Some slides from the event have been posted here:
https://zenodo.org/communities/muecos/records?q=&l=list&p=1&s=10&sort=newest

And some of the resources and topics that came up 👇

The #ECR reviewer's platform aims to empower junior reviewers and equip #ECRs with the necessary skills to conduct methodologically rigorous reviews
ecr-reviewers.gitlab.io/guide/
#PostGraduate #PGR

#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity

RE: https://fediscience.org/@alexh/116518145538497476

This was really interesting 👏

Some slides from the event have been posted here:
https://zenodo.org/communities/muecos/records?q=&l=list&p=1&s=10&sort=newest

And some of the resources and topics that came up 👇

The #ECR reviewer's platform aims to empower junior reviewers and equip #ECRs with the necessary skills to conduct methodologically rigorous reviews
ecr-reviewers.gitlab.io/guide/
#PostGraduate #PGR

#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity

RE: https://fediscience.org/@alexh/116518145538497476

This was really interesting 👏

Some slides from the event have been posted here:
https://zenodo.org/communities/muecos/records?q=&l=list&p=1&s=10&sort=newest

And some of the resources and topics that came up 👇

The #ECR reviewer's platform aims to empower junior reviewers and equip #ECRs with the necessary skills to conduct methodologically rigorous reviews
ecr-reviewers.gitlab.io/guide/
#PostGraduate #PGR

#AcademicPublishing #NightshiftEditor #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity

Interesting pointer from a #JEDI thread:
Description of a process to integrate evaluation of computational reproducibility into #PeerReview:
https://f1000research.com/articles/10-253/v2

I also like the ethos and wonder whether #PeerReview in general could learn from this?

1. Codecheckers record but don’t investigate or fix.
2. Communication between humans is key
3. Credit is given to codecheckers.
4. Computational workflows must be auditable.
5. Open by default and transitional by disposition.

#NightshiftEditor

Interesting pointer from a #JEDI thread:
Description of a process to integrate evaluation of computational reproducibility into #PeerReview:
https://f1000research.com/articles/10-253/v2

I also like the ethos and wonder whether #PeerReview in general could learn from this?

1. Codecheckers record but don’t investigate or fix.
2. Communication between humans is key
3. Credit is given to codecheckers.
4. Computational workflows must be auditable.
5. Open by default and transitional by disposition.

#NightshiftEditor

Interesting pointer from a #JEDI thread:
Description of a process to integrate evaluation of computational reproducibility into #PeerReview:
https://f1000research.com/articles/10-253/v2

I also like the ethos and wonder whether #PeerReview in general could learn from this?

1. Codecheckers record but don’t investigate or fix.
2. Communication between humans is key
3. Credit is given to codecheckers.
4. Computational workflows must be auditable.
5. Open by default and transitional by disposition.

#NightshiftEditor

Interesting pointer from a #JEDI thread:
Description of a process to integrate evaluation of computational reproducibility into #PeerReview:
https://f1000research.com/articles/10-253/v2

I also like the ethos and wonder whether #PeerReview in general could learn from this?

1. Codecheckers record but don’t investigate or fix.
2. Communication between humans is key
3. Credit is given to codecheckers.
4. Computational workflows must be auditable.
5. Open by default and transitional by disposition.

#NightshiftEditor

Got a #PeerReview request from an electronic #OpenAccess journal that charges APCs. So far so normal.

But they charge an additional fee of US$100 per page if a paper exceeds page count limits. Admittedly, those are set realistically (for my field at least). But in an electronic journal?

#NightshiftEditor

Got a #PeerReview request from an electronic #OpenAccess journal that charges APCs. So far so normal.

But they charge an additional fee of US$100 per page if a paper exceeds page count limits. Admittedly, those are set realistically (for my field at least). But in an electronic journal?

#NightshiftEditor

Got a #PeerReview request from an electronic #OpenAccess journal that charges APCs. So far so normal.

But they charge an additional fee of US$100 per page if a paper exceeds page count limits. Admittedly, those are set realistically (for my field at least). But in an electronic journal?

#NightshiftEditor

Got a #PeerReview request from an electronic #OpenAccess journal that charges APCs. So far so normal.

But they charge an additional fee of US$100 per page if a paper exceeds page count limits. Admittedly, those are set realistically (for my field at least). But in an electronic journal?

#NightshiftEditor

I recently had to re-visit SAGE's "Reviewer's Guide"* and was surprised that it still contained these questions to guide the formation of the first impression of a paper:

Is this paper relevant for the journal?

Is this research significant within the field?

Is the work presented novel?

Does it add to the subject area?

Arguably, none of these are questions for reviewers to answer.

#PeerReview #NightshiftEditor
* https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/how_to_become_a_reviewer_new_0.pdf

I recently had to re-visit SAGE's "Reviewer's Guide"* and was surprised that it still contained these questions to guide the formation of the first impression of a paper:

Is this paper relevant for the journal?

Is this research significant within the field?

Is the work presented novel?

Does it add to the subject area?

Arguably, none of these are questions for reviewers to answer.

#PeerReview #NightshiftEditor
* https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/how_to_become_a_reviewer_new_0.pdf

I recently had to re-visit SAGE's "Reviewer's Guide"* and was surprised that it still contained these questions to guide the formation of the first impression of a paper:

Is this paper relevant for the journal?

Is this research significant within the field?

Is the work presented novel?

Does it add to the subject area?

Arguably, none of these are questions for reviewers to answer.

#PeerReview #NightshiftEditor
* https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/how_to_become_a_reviewer_new_0.pdf

Great @EASE seminar yesterday
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjYWGlatYZQ

Really good content also for authors, PIs, #PeerReview -ers & people who consider #RCT methodology for future work.

The discussion was lively and covered some advanced topics.

One key moment:
the broader landscape of registrations, and within that the specific trial requirements, is often not covered well in the literature and such talks - for more, check in at 6:24min

#Registration #PreRegistration #RCT #NightshiftEditor #AcademicWriting

Great @EASE seminar yesterday
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjYWGlatYZQ

Really good content also for authors, PIs, #PeerReview -ers & people who consider #RCT methodology for future work.

The discussion was lively and covered some advanced topics.

One key moment:
the broader landscape of registrations, and within that the specific trial requirements, is often not covered well in the literature and such talks - for more, check in at 6:24min

#Registration #PreRegistration #RCT #NightshiftEditor #AcademicWriting

Great @EASE seminar yesterday
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjYWGlatYZQ

Really good content also for authors, PIs, #PeerReview -ers & people who consider #RCT methodology for future work.

The discussion was lively and covered some advanced topics.

One key moment:
the broader landscape of registrations, and within that the specific trial requirements, is often not covered well in the literature and such talks - for more, check in at 6:24min

#Registration #PreRegistration #RCT #NightshiftEditor #AcademicWriting

Touching on trials, reporting guidelines, and journal publishing/ editing - this
@EASE science webinar on 30.09. sounds very promising:
https://ease.org.uk/event/ease-germany-webinar-clinical-trial-transparency-from-registration-to-results-reporting/

#NightshiftEditor #AcademicPublishing #RCTs

Touching on trials, reporting guidelines, and journal publishing/ editing - this
@EASE science webinar on 30.09. sounds very promising:
https://ease.org.uk/event/ease-germany-webinar-clinical-trial-transparency-from-registration-to-results-reporting/

#NightshiftEditor #AcademicPublishing #RCTs

Touching on trials, reporting guidelines, and journal publishing/ editing - this
@EASE science webinar on 30.09. sounds very promising:
https://ease.org.uk/event/ease-germany-webinar-clinical-trial-transparency-from-registration-to-results-reporting/

#NightshiftEditor #AcademicPublishing #RCTs

Touching on trials, reporting guidelines, and journal publishing/ editing - this
@EASE science webinar on 30.09. sounds very promising:
https://ease.org.uk/event/ease-germany-webinar-clinical-trial-transparency-from-registration-to-results-reporting/

#NightshiftEditor #AcademicPublishing #RCTs

Brittany Lapin and I edited* the joint publication of the PRISMA-COSMIN guidelines for Outcome Measurement Instruments 2024 in four journals last year:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38980635/

It is great to see that this is now also accompanied by table templates for communication of results
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-025-04058-y

#NightshiftEditor #ReportingGuidelines #AcademicPublishing #SysReview #Psychometrics
* https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ukw93_v1

Brittany Lapin and I edited* the joint publication of the PRISMA-COSMIN guidelines for Outcome Measurement Instruments 2024 in four journals last year:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38980635/

It is great to see that this is now also accompanied by table templates for communication of results
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-025-04058-y

#NightshiftEditor #ReportingGuidelines #AcademicPublishing #SysReview #Psychometrics
* https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ukw93_v1

Brittany Lapin and I edited* the joint publication of the PRISMA-COSMIN guidelines for Outcome Measurement Instruments 2024 in four journals last year:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38980635/

It is great to see that this is now also accompanied by table templates for communication of results
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-025-04058-y

#NightshiftEditor #ReportingGuidelines #AcademicPublishing #SysReview #Psychometrics
* https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ukw93_v1

Brittany Lapin and I edited* the joint publication of the PRISMA-COSMIN guidelines for Outcome Measurement Instruments 2024 in four journals last year:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38980635/

It is great to see that this is now also accompanied by table templates for communication of results
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-025-04058-y

#NightshiftEditor #ReportingGuidelines #AcademicPublishing #SysReview #Psychometrics
* https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ukw93_v1

Brittany Lapin and I edited* the joint publication of the PRISMA-COSMIN guidelines for Outcome Measurement Instruments 2024 in four journals last year:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38980635/

It is great to see that this is now also accompanied by table templates for communication of results
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-025-04058-y

#NightshiftEditor #ReportingGuidelines #AcademicPublishing #SysReview #Psychometrics
* https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ukw93_v1

Brittany Lapin and I edited* the joint publication of the PRISMA-COSMIN guidelines for Outcome Measurement Instruments 2024 in four journals last year:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38980635/

It is great to see that this is now also accompanied by table templates for communication of results
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-025-04058-y

#NightshiftEditor #ReportingGuidelines #AcademicPublishing #SysReview #Psychometrics
* https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ukw93_v1

Brittany Lapin and I edited* the joint publication of the PRISMA-COSMIN guidelines for Outcome Measurement Instruments 2024 in four journals last year:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38980635/

It is great to see that this is now also accompanied by table templates for communication of results
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-025-04058-y

#NightshiftEditor #ReportingGuidelines #AcademicPublishing #SysReview #Psychometrics
* https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ukw93_v1

Brittany Lapin and I edited* the joint publication of the PRISMA-COSMIN guidelines for Outcome Measurement Instruments 2024 in four journals last year:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38980635/

It is great to see that this is now also accompanied by table templates for communication of results
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-025-04058-y

#NightshiftEditor #ReportingGuidelines #AcademicPublishing #SysReview #Psychometrics
* https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ukw93_v1

New #AcademicYear - New #introduction

I am a researcher at #DundeeUni and interested in health-related quality of life
#HRQoL #Psychometrics

I teach #ResearchMethodology and #ResearchMethods with a focus on #Quantitative methods.

I worked for 7yrs as a #NightshiftEditor and I am still mulling over roles in and sense of #AcademicPublishing

This is mainly a work account, but I also post #Dundee stuff such as #DunDeCofaidh and occasional #Deutsch #Svenska #Gaidhlig (👉 pure work account at BSky)

New #AcademicYear - New #introduction

I am a researcher at #DundeeUni and interested in health-related quality of life
#HRQoL #Psychometrics

I teach #ResearchMethodology and #ResearchMethods with a focus on #Quantitative methods.

I worked for 7yrs as a #NightshiftEditor and I am still mulling over roles in and sense of #AcademicPublishing

This is mainly a work account, but I also post #Dundee stuff such as #DunDeCofaidh and occasional #Deutsch #Svenska #Gaidhlig (👉 pure work account at BSky)

New #AcademicYear - New #introduction

I am a researcher at #DundeeUni and interested in health-related quality of life
#HRQoL #Psychometrics

I teach #ResearchMethodology and #ResearchMethods with a focus on #Quantitative methods.

I worked for 7yrs as a #NightshiftEditor and I am still mulling over roles in and sense of #AcademicPublishing

This is mainly a work account, but I also post #Dundee stuff such as #DunDeCofaidh and occasional #Deutsch #Svenska #Gaidhlig (👉 pure work account at BSky)

New #AcademicYear - New #introduction

I am a researcher at #DundeeUni and interested in health-related quality of life
#HRQoL #Psychometrics

I teach #ResearchMethodology and #ResearchMethods with a focus on #Quantitative methods.

I worked for 7yrs as a #NightshiftEditor and I am still mulling over roles in and sense of #AcademicPublishing

This is mainly a work account, but I also post #Dundee stuff such as #DunDeCofaidh and occasional #Deutsch #Svenska #Gaidhlig (👉 pure work account at BSky)

New #AcademicYear - New #introduction

I am a researcher at #DundeeUni and interested in health-related quality of life
#HRQoL #Psychometrics

I teach #ResearchMethodology and #ResearchMethods with a focus on #Quantitative methods.

I worked for 7yrs as a #NightshiftEditor and I am still mulling over roles in and sense of #AcademicPublishing

This is mainly a work account, but I also post #Dundee stuff such as #DunDeCofaidh and occasional #Deutsch #Svenska #Gaidhlig (👉 pure work account at BSky)

Tired of using the same old repository for publishing your #PrePrints and materials?

Maybe a look at the
Directory of #OpenAccess Preprint Repositories*
is helpful:
https://doapr.coar-repositories.org/

#NightshiftEditor #AcademicPublishing
*Talk to (research) librarians. They know stuff!

Tired of using the same old repository for publishing your #PrePrints and materials?

Maybe a look at the
Directory of #OpenAccess Preprint Repositories*
is helpful:
https://doapr.coar-repositories.org/

#NightshiftEditor #AcademicPublishing
*Talk to (research) librarians. They know stuff!

Tired of using the same old repository for publishing your #PrePrints and materials?

Maybe a look at the
Directory of #OpenAccess Preprint Repositories*
is helpful:
https://doapr.coar-repositories.org/

#NightshiftEditor #AcademicPublishing
*Talk to (research) librarians. They know stuff!

Tired of using the same old repository for publishing your #PrePrints and materials?

Maybe a look at the
Directory of #OpenAccess Preprint Repositories*
is helpful:
https://doapr.coar-repositories.org/

#NightshiftEditor #AcademicPublishing
*Talk to (research) librarians. They know stuff!