#publicationethics — Public Fediverse posts

RE: https://fediscience.org/@satrevik/116612366859411834

Really interesting question.

I brought something similar last month to our #Postgraduate group with this paper as an example:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2026.2633517

This led to a good discussion about #AcademicCronyism. Whatever one thinks about the items in the poll, the paper offers some shades of grey regarding such actions.

#PublicationEthics #AcademicPublishing #ResearchEthics #COPE

In this Correspondence article in European Science Editing, Joshua Wang discusses how retractions do not just correct the scientific record, but serve as crucial datapoints that inform meta-research and research education.

Read it in the journal now: https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2024.e140235

#Retractions #MetaResearch #EuropeanScienceEditing #JournalEditing #PublicationEthics

In this new Correspondence article in European Science Editing, Joshua Wang discusses how retractions do not just correct the scientific record, but serve as crucial datapoints that inform meta-research and research education.

Read it in the journal now:
https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2024.e140235

#Retractions #MetaResearch #EuropeanScienceEditing #JournalEditing #PublicationEthics

What are the features of predatory journal lists?

A recent Review in European Science Editing compares and contrasts the lists to better understand how useful each list is at characterizing unethical journal activity, and the value of the information they provide in helping authors and the academic community to easily identify such journals.

https://ese.arphahub.com/article/118119/

#AcademicJournals #PredatoryJournals #BeallsList #Cabells #Kscien #EuropeanScienceEditing #PredatoryPublishing #PublicationEthics

A novel metric could indicate a journal's editorial standards, integrity, and responsiveness on ethical issues.

In this Review in European Science Editing, Bor Luen Tang of National University of Singapore proposes a score of editorial team efficiency in handling pre- and post-publication issues, highlighting a previously unquantified value to uphold the integrity of published research.
https://ese.arphahub.com/articles.php?id=120611&journal_name=ese

#JournalEditing #PublicationEthics #EuropeanScienceEditing #ResearchIntegrity

This viewpoint in European Science Editing makes an argument for open review practices mediating the hotly debated question of whether editors-in-chief should publish in their own journals.

A potential solution to this age-old problem.

https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e90552

#EuropeanScienceEditing #PeerReview #PublicationEthics #ConflictsOfInterest #COI #OpenPeerReview