home.social

#bibliometrics — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #bibliometrics, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Can we trust “guidelines on how to write a scientific paper”? We analysed 71 “Write a Scientific Paper” guidelines that were widely used and cited for years as best practices.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2026.

    Facts:
    ▪️ 555 citations
    ▪️ 48 papers carry an editorial expression of concern
    ▪️ 30 (42%) have been retracted!

    #AcademicPublishing #ResearchIntegrity #Retractions #ScholarlyCommunication #Bibliometrics #PublicationEthics #PeerReview

  2. Do you have experience with VOSviewer (or similar) and are you interested in helping us visualize citation networks as part of our systematic review? Please get in touch with Sebastiaan via [email protected]. Co-authorship is possible. #VOSviewer #citationnetworks #bibliometrics

  3. “In my opinion, metric-based recognition without integrity screening can inadvertently legitimize problematic practices. That risk is particularly acute in environments where publication is tied to career progression but where research funding, infrastructure, and oversight remain weak. These conditions can – and often do – fuel paper mills, coercive citation policies, and other unethical behaviors.”

    Maryam Sayab spoke to Frederik Joelving for Retraction Watch on Clarivate's involvement in Iraqi research awards being granted to individuals with known integrity concerns.

    retractionwatch.com/2025/10/31

    #Bibliometrics #Scientometrics #Citations #Retractions #ResearchIntegrity #PublicationEthics #Iraq #MENA #RetractionWatch