#researchassessment — Public Fediverse posts

We evaluate researchers through papers, citations, grants and h-index. But much of good science depends on something these metrics barely capture: the quality of relationships between people – trust, mentoring, generosity, and the freedom to disagree.

:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05793-w

Not everything that matters in science should become another KPI.

#ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchCulture #ResponsibleResearch

We evaluate researchers through papers, citations, grants and h-index. But much of good science depends on something these metrics barely capture: the quality of relationships between people – trust, mentoring, generosity, and the freedom to disagree.

:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05793-w

Not everything that matters in science should become another KPI.

#ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchCulture #ResponsibleResearch

We evaluate researchers through papers, citations, grants and h-index. But much of good science depends on something these metrics barely capture: the quality of relationships between people – trust, mentoring, generosity, and the freedom to disagree.

:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05793-w

Not everything that matters in science should become another KPI.

#ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchCulture #ResponsibleResearch

We evaluate researchers through papers, citations, grants and h-index. But much of good science depends on something these metrics barely capture: the quality of relationships between people – trust, mentoring, generosity, and the freedom to disagree.

:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05793-w

Not everything that matters in science should become another KPI.

#ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchCulture #ResponsibleResearch

We evaluate researchers through papers, citations, grants and h-index. But much of good science depends on something these metrics barely capture: the quality of relationships between people – trust, mentoring, generosity, and the freedom to disagree.

:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05793-w

Not everything that matters in science should become another KPI.

#ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchCulture #ResponsibleResearch

Peer review is essential to how research is evaluated and improved, yet much of this work remains largely invisible and disregarded in research assessment systems. What would it take to change that?

💬 @DORAssessment and PREreview teamed up to bring together diverse voices into addressing this important question. Join the conversation, and share your experiences and ideas for bolstering how research communities, institutions, funders, and infrastructure organizations recognize and reward peer-review contributions.

📅 October 7, 2026 - 14:00 to 15:30 UTC
🔗 Registrations are now open: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/Cn_XcxgVT7q7gTqFaCL4hw#/registration

The roundtable discussion will be initiated by Giovanna Lima (DORA), Daniela Saderi (PREreview), Bernd Pulverer (@emboreports & @EMBOPress ), Anna Hatch (HHMI), Pablo Ranea Robles (Universidad de Granada), and Laura Ación (@MetaDocencia / Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET).

#OpenScience #PeerReview #ResearchAssessment

Peer review is essential to how research is evaluated and improved, yet much of this work remains largely invisible and disregarded in research assessment systems. What would it take to change that?

💬 @DORAssessment and PREreview teamed up to bring together diverse voices into addressing this important question. Join the conversation, and share your experiences and ideas for bolstering how research communities, institutions, funders, and infrastructure organizations recognize and reward peer-review contributions.

📅 October 7, 2026 - 14:00 to 15:30 UTC
🔗 Registrations are now open: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/Cn_XcxgVT7q7gTqFaCL4hw#/registration

The roundtable discussion will be initiated by Giovanna Lima (DORA), Daniela Saderi (PREreview), Bernd Pulverer (@emboreports & @EMBOPress ), Anna Hatch (HHMI), Pablo Ranea Robles (Universidad de Granada), and Laura Ación (@MetaDocencia / Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET).

#OpenScience #PeerReview #ResearchAssessment

Peer review is essential to how research is evaluated and improved, yet much of this work remains largely invisible and disregarded in research assessment systems. What would it take to change that?

💬 @DORAssessment and PREreview teamed up to bring together diverse voices into addressing this important question. Join the conversation, and share your experiences and ideas for bolstering how research communities, institutions, funders, and infrastructure organizations recognize and reward peer-review contributions.

📅 October 7, 2026 - 14:00 to 15:30 UTC
🔗 Registrations are now open: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/Cn_XcxgVT7q7gTqFaCL4hw#/registration

The roundtable discussion will be initiated by Giovanna Lima (DORA), Daniela Saderi (PREreview), Bernd Pulverer (@emboreports & @EMBOPress ), Anna Hatch (HHMI), Pablo Ranea Robles (Universidad de Granada), and Laura Ación (@MetaDocencia / Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET).

#OpenScience #PeerReview #ResearchAssessment

Peer review is essential to how research is evaluated and improved, yet much of this work remains largely invisible and disregarded in research assessment systems. What would it take to change that?

💬 @DORAssessment and PREreview teamed up to bring together diverse voices into addressing this important question. Join the conversation, and share your experiences and ideas for bolstering how research communities, institutions, funders, and infrastructure organizations recognize and reward peer-review contributions.

📅 October 7, 2026 - 14:00 to 15:30 UTC
🔗 Registrations are now open: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/Cn_XcxgVT7q7gTqFaCL4hw#/registration

The roundtable discussion will be initiated by Giovanna Lima (DORA), Daniela Saderi (PREreview), Bernd Pulverer (@emboreports & @EMBOPress ), Anna Hatch (HHMI), Pablo Ranea Robles (Universidad de Granada), and Laura Ación (@MetaDocencia / Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET).

#OpenScience #PeerReview #ResearchAssessment

Peer review is essential to how research is evaluated and improved, yet much of this work remains largely invisible and disregarded in research assessment systems. What would it take to change that?

💬 @DORAssessment and PREreview teamed up to bring together diverse voices into addressing this important question. Join the conversation, and share your experiences and ideas for bolstering how research communities, institutions, funders, and infrastructure organizations recognize and reward peer-review contributions.

📅 October 7, 2026 - 14:00 to 15:30 UTC
🔗 Registrations are now open: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/Cn_XcxgVT7q7gTqFaCL4hw#/registration

The roundtable discussion will be initiated by Giovanna Lima (DORA), Daniela Saderi (PREreview), Bernd Pulverer (@emboreports & @EMBOPress ), Anna Hatch (HHMI), Pablo Ranea Robles (Universidad de Granada), and Laura Ación (@MetaDocencia / Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET).

#OpenScience #PeerReview #ResearchAssessment