home.social

#researchassessment — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #researchassessment, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. RE: mastodon.social/@OpenAIRE/1172

    Excited to be part of the #ARION consortium! Together with a fantastic group of project partners, the @HelmholtzOpenScienceOffice will be working on turning responsible research assessment into everyday practice 🚀 #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA @OpenAIRE (lmf)

  2. RE: mastodon.social/@OpenAIRE/1172

    Excited to be part of the #ARION consortium! Together with a fantastic group of project partners, the @HelmholtzOpenScienceOffice will be working on turning responsible research assessment into everyday practice 🚀 #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA @OpenAIRE (lmf)

  3. RE: mastodon.social/@OpenAIRE/1172

    Excited to be part of the #ARION consortium! Together with a fantastic group of project partners, the @HelmholtzOpenScienceOffice will be working on turning responsible research assessment into everyday practice 🚀 #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA @OpenAIRE (lmf)

  4. RE: mastodon.social/@OpenAIRE/1172

    Excited to be part of the #ARION consortium! Together with a fantastic group of project partners, the @HelmholtzOpenScienceOffice will be working on turning responsible research assessment into everyday practice 🚀 #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA @OpenAIRE (lmf)

  5. RE: mastodon.social/@OpenAIRE/1172

    Excited to be part of the #ARION consortium! Together with a fantastic group of project partners, the @HelmholtzOpenScienceOffice will be working on turning responsible research assessment into everyday practice 🚀 #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA @OpenAIRE (lmf)

  6. What is „Research Excellence“? We tried to fill an often empty term (some might call it a bullshit term) with some substance.

    zenodo.org/records/21670038

    (see also the booklet in the downloads for some explaining text).

    This work was done together with Katarzyna Nawrot, Rachel Heyard and Davide Crepaldi in the CoARA Working Group „Responsible Metrics and Indicators“.

    #researchexcellence #CoARA #ResearchAssessment

  7. What is „Research Excellence“? We tried to fill an often empty term (some might call it a bullshit term) with some substance.

    zenodo.org/records/21670038

    (see also the booklet in the downloads for some explaining text).

    This work was done together with Katarzyna Nawrot, Rachel Heyard and Davide Crepaldi in the CoARA Working Group „Responsible Metrics and Indicators“.

    #researchexcellence #CoARA #ResearchAssessment

  8. What is „Research Excellence“? We tried to fill an often empty term (some might call it a bullshit term) with some substance.

    zenodo.org/records/21670038

    (see also the booklet in the downloads for some explaining text).

    This work was done together with Katarzyna Nawrot, Rachel Heyard and Davide Crepaldi in the CoARA Working Group „Responsible Metrics and Indicators“.

    #researchexcellence #CoARA #ResearchAssessment

  9. What is „Research Excellence“? We tried to fill an often empty term (some might call it a bullshit term) with some substance.

    zenodo.org/records/21670038

    (see also the booklet in the downloads for some explaining text).

    This work was done together with Katarzyna Nawrot, Rachel Heyard and Davide Crepaldi in the CoARA Working Group „Responsible Metrics and Indicators“.

    #researchexcellence #CoARA #ResearchAssessment

  10. What is „Research Excellence“? We tried to fill an often empty term (some might call it a bullshit term) with some substance.

    zenodo.org/records/21670038

    (see also the booklet in the downloads for some explaining text).

    This work was done together with Katarzyna Nawrot, Rachel Heyard and Davide Crepaldi in the CoARA Working Group „Responsible Metrics and Indicators“.

    #researchexcellence #CoARA #ResearchAssessment

  11. Das CoARA German National Chapter lädt ein:
    ➡️ #CoARA und verantwortungsvolle #Forschungsbewertung: Impulse für ein zukunftsorientiertes Verständnis von Exzellenz
    👥 Miriam Kip, Matthias Kiesselbach, @mathijsvleugel
    📅 07. Oktober 2026, 13:00 bis 14:00 Uhr
    🌐 Online, auf Deutsch
    ℹ️ Programm und Anmeldung: os.helmholtz.de/veranstaltunge
    #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #Forschungsbewertung (lmf)

  12. Das CoARA German National Chapter lädt ein:
    ➡️ #CoARA und verantwortungsvolle #Forschungsbewertung: Impulse für ein zukunftsorientiertes Verständnis von Exzellenz
    👥 Miriam Kip, Matthias Kiesselbach, @mathijsvleugel
    📅 07. Oktober 2026, 13:00 bis 14:00 Uhr
    🌐 Online, auf Deutsch
    ℹ️ Programm und Anmeldung: os.helmholtz.de/veranstaltunge
    #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #Forschungsbewertung (lmf)

  13. Das CoARA German National Chapter lädt ein:
    ➡️ #CoARA und verantwortungsvolle #Forschungsbewertung: Impulse für ein zukunftsorientiertes Verständnis von Exzellenz
    👥 Miriam Kip, Matthias Kiesselbach, @mathijsvleugel
    📅 07. Oktober 2026, 13:00 bis 14:00 Uhr
    🌐 Online, auf Deutsch
    ℹ️ Programm und Anmeldung: os.helmholtz.de/veranstaltunge
    #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #Forschungsbewertung (lmf)

  14. Das CoARA German National Chapter lädt ein:
    ➡️ #CoARA und verantwortungsvolle #Forschungsbewertung: Impulse für ein zukunftsorientiertes Verständnis von Exzellenz
    👥 Miriam Kip, Matthias Kiesselbach, @mathijsvleugel
    📅 07. Oktober 2026, 13:00 bis 14:00 Uhr
    🌐 Online, auf Deutsch
    ℹ️ Programm und Anmeldung: os.helmholtz.de/veranstaltunge
    #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #Forschungsbewertung (lmf)

  15. Das CoARA German National Chapter lädt ein:
    ➡️ #CoARA und verantwortungsvolle #Forschungsbewertung: Impulse für ein zukunftsorientiertes Verständnis von Exzellenz
    👥 Miriam Kip, Matthias Kiesselbach, @mathijsvleugel
    📅 07. Oktober 2026, 13:00 bis 14:00 Uhr
    🌐 Online, auf Deutsch
    ℹ️ Programm und Anmeldung: os.helmholtz.de/veranstaltunge
    #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #Forschungsbewertung (lmf)

  16. Is Scopus really a curated bibliographic database?

    A new Scientometrics study finds 2.7M records without author information, 500K+ records with unknown source titles, inconsistent document types, and even London recorded as an affiliation.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-057

    A useful reminder: better research assessment starts with understanding and checking the data - not just pressing a button.

    #Scopus #Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchEvaluation

  17. Is Scopus really a curated bibliographic database?

    A new Scientometrics study finds 2.7M records without author information, 500K+ records with unknown source titles, inconsistent document types, and even London recorded as an affiliation.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-057

    A useful reminder: better research assessment starts with understanding and checking the data - not just pressing a button.

    #Scopus #Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchEvaluation

  18. Is Scopus really a curated bibliographic database?

    A new Scientometrics study finds 2.7M records without author information, 500K+ records with unknown source titles, inconsistent document types, and even London recorded as an affiliation.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-057

    A useful reminder: better research assessment starts with understanding and checking the data - not just pressing a button.

    #Scopus #Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchEvaluation

  19. Is Scopus really a curated bibliographic database?

    A new Scientometrics study finds 2.7M records without author information, 500K+ records with unknown source titles, inconsistent document types, and even London recorded as an affiliation.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-057

    A useful reminder: better research assessment starts with understanding and checking the data - not just pressing a button.

    #Scopus #Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchEvaluation

  20. Is Scopus really a curated bibliographic database?

    A new Scientometrics study finds 2.7M records without author information, 500K+ records with unknown source titles, inconsistent document types, and even London recorded as an affiliation.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-057

    A useful reminder: better research assessment starts with understanding and checking the data - not just pressing a button.

    #Scopus #Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchEvaluation

  21. An interesting paper by Lutz Bornmann and António Osório on incentives, competition, and undesirable practices in science.

    The debate over research metrics is often framed too simply: metrics or no metrics? A better question is: what kind of behaviour does an evaluation system make rational? Good research assessment should make doing good science the rational choice.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1038/s44319-026-009

    #ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchIntegrity

  22. An interesting paper by Lutz Bornmann and António Osório on incentives, competition, and undesirable practices in science.

    The debate over research metrics is often framed too simply: metrics or no metrics? A better question is: what kind of behaviour does an evaluation system make rational? Good research assessment should make doing good science the rational choice.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1038/s44319-026-009

    #ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchIntegrity

  23. An interesting paper by Lutz Bornmann and António Osório on incentives, competition, and undesirable practices in science.

    The debate over research metrics is often framed too simply: metrics or no metrics? A better question is: what kind of behaviour does an evaluation system make rational? Good research assessment should make doing good science the rational choice.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1038/s44319-026-009

    #ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchIntegrity

  24. An interesting paper by Lutz Bornmann and António Osório on incentives, competition, and undesirable practices in science.

    The debate over research metrics is often framed too simply: metrics or no metrics? A better question is: what kind of behaviour does an evaluation system make rational? Good research assessment should make doing good science the rational choice.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1038/s44319-026-009

    #ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchIntegrity

  25. An interesting paper by Lutz Bornmann and António Osório on incentives, competition, and undesirable practices in science.

    The debate over research metrics is often framed too simply: metrics or no metrics? A better question is: what kind of behaviour does an evaluation system make rational? Good research assessment should make doing good science the rational choice.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1038/s44319-026-009

    #ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchIntegrity

  26. An interesting evolution from Mike Thelwall. A year ago, he was cautiously exploring whether LLMs could approximate expert research assessment. Today, he reports that ChatGPT-5 mini reached correlations of up to 0.905 with expert REF2021 quality assessments across some disciplines, using a dataset of more than 107,000 UK research articles.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2026-0058

    #ResearchEvaluation #Scientometrics #ResearchAssessment #ChatGPT #LLM #AI #SciencePolicy

  27. An interesting evolution from Mike Thelwall. A year ago, he was cautiously exploring whether LLMs could approximate expert research assessment. Today, he reports that ChatGPT-5 mini reached correlations of up to 0.905 with expert REF2021 quality assessments across some disciplines, using a dataset of more than 107,000 UK research articles.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2026-0058

    #ResearchEvaluation #Scientometrics #ResearchAssessment #ChatGPT #LLM #AI #SciencePolicy

  28. An interesting evolution from Mike Thelwall. A year ago, he was cautiously exploring whether LLMs could approximate expert research assessment. Today, he reports that ChatGPT-5 mini reached correlations of up to 0.905 with expert REF2021 quality assessments across some disciplines, using a dataset of more than 107,000 UK research articles.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2026-0058

    #ResearchEvaluation #Scientometrics #ResearchAssessment #ChatGPT #LLM #AI #SciencePolicy

  29. An interesting evolution from Mike Thelwall. A year ago, he was cautiously exploring whether LLMs could approximate expert research assessment. Today, he reports that ChatGPT-5 mini reached correlations of up to 0.905 with expert REF2021 quality assessments across some disciplines, using a dataset of more than 107,000 UK research articles.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2026-0058

    #ResearchEvaluation #Scientometrics #ResearchAssessment #ChatGPT #LLM #AI #SciencePolicy

  30. An interesting evolution from Mike Thelwall. A year ago, he was cautiously exploring whether LLMs could approximate expert research assessment. Today, he reports that ChatGPT-5 mini reached correlations of up to 0.905 with expert REF2021 quality assessments across some disciplines, using a dataset of more than 107,000 UK research articles.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2026-0058

    #ResearchEvaluation #Scientometrics #ResearchAssessment #ChatGPT #LLM #AI #SciencePolicy

  31. A timely new commentary in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology raises an uncomfortable question:

    Can anti-metric research assessment reforms backfire in weak academic systems?

    :doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.202

    Reducing metrics may work where institutions are strong. But in fragile systems, it may unintentionally increase the influence of favouritism, academic inbreeding, and opaque decision-making.

    #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA #Bibliometrics #MetaResearch #OpenScience #SciencePolicy

  32. A timely new commentary in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology raises an uncomfortable question:

    Can anti-metric research assessment reforms backfire in weak academic systems?

    :doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.202

    Reducing metrics may work where institutions are strong. But in fragile systems, it may unintentionally increase the influence of favouritism, academic inbreeding, and opaque decision-making.

    #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA #Bibliometrics #MetaResearch #OpenScience #SciencePolicy

  33. A timely new commentary in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology raises an uncomfortable question:

    Can anti-metric research assessment reforms backfire in weak academic systems?

    :doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.202

    Reducing metrics may work where institutions are strong. But in fragile systems, it may unintentionally increase the influence of favouritism, academic inbreeding, and opaque decision-making.

    #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA #Bibliometrics #MetaResearch #OpenScience #SciencePolicy

  34. A timely new commentary in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology raises an uncomfortable question:

    Can anti-metric research assessment reforms backfire in weak academic systems?

    :doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.202

    Reducing metrics may work where institutions are strong. But in fragile systems, it may unintentionally increase the influence of favouritism, academic inbreeding, and opaque decision-making.

    #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA #Bibliometrics #MetaResearch #OpenScience #SciencePolicy

  35. A timely new commentary in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology raises an uncomfortable question:

    Can anti-metric research assessment reforms backfire in weak academic systems?

    :doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.202

    Reducing metrics may work where institutions are strong. But in fragile systems, it may unintentionally increase the influence of favouritism, academic inbreeding, and opaque decision-making.

    #ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA #Bibliometrics #MetaResearch #OpenScience #SciencePolicy

  36. 🆕 The Helmholtz Modular Curriculum Vitae Template provides a flexible framework for designing CVs for tenure, hiring, and promotion processes. It combines narrative and quantitative elements and supports the selection of relevant evaluation criteria.

    🔗 doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21292656

    #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment (lmf)

  37. 🆕 The Helmholtz Modular Curriculum Vitae Template provides a flexible framework for designing CVs for tenure, hiring, and promotion processes. It combines narrative and quantitative elements and supports the selection of relevant evaluation criteria.

    🔗 doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21292656

    #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment (lmf)

  38. 🆕 The Helmholtz Modular Curriculum Vitae Template provides a flexible framework for designing CVs for tenure, hiring, and promotion processes. It combines narrative and quantitative elements and supports the selection of relevant evaluation criteria.

    🔗 doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21292656

    #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment (lmf)

  39. 🆕 The Helmholtz Modular Curriculum Vitae Template provides a flexible framework for designing CVs for tenure, hiring, and promotion processes. It combines narrative and quantitative elements and supports the selection of relevant evaluation criteria.

    🔗 doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21292656

    #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment (lmf)

  40. 🆕 The Helmholtz Modular Curriculum Vitae Template provides a flexible framework for designing CVs for tenure, hiring, and promotion processes. It combines narrative and quantitative elements and supports the selection of relevant evaluation criteria.

    🔗 doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21292656

    #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment (lmf)

  41. Can a national research ranking claim to reward the "most productive researchers" while capping the value of additional scientific output?

    I looked closely at the formula behind Ukraine's new government-funded ranking. My conclusion: it optimizes for something quite different. Full explanation on LinkedIn 👇

    linkedin.com/posts/nazarovets_

    #ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #OpenScience #CoARA #DORA

  42. Can a national research ranking claim to reward the "most productive researchers" while capping the value of additional scientific output?

    I looked closely at the formula behind Ukraine's new government-funded ranking. My conclusion: it optimizes for something quite different. Full explanation on LinkedIn 👇

    linkedin.com/posts/nazarovets_

    #ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #OpenScience #CoARA #DORA

  43. Can a national research ranking claim to reward the "most productive researchers" while capping the value of additional scientific output?

    I looked closely at the formula behind Ukraine's new government-funded ranking. My conclusion: it optimizes for something quite different. Full explanation on LinkedIn 👇

    linkedin.com/posts/nazarovets_

    #ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #OpenScience #CoARA #DORA

  44. Can a national research ranking claim to reward the "most productive researchers" while capping the value of additional scientific output?

    I looked closely at the formula behind Ukraine's new government-funded ranking. My conclusion: it optimizes for something quite different. Full explanation on LinkedIn 👇

    linkedin.com/posts/nazarovets_

    #ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #OpenScience #CoARA #DORA

  45. Can a national research ranking claim to reward the "most productive researchers" while capping the value of additional scientific output?

    I looked closely at the formula behind Ukraine's new government-funded ranking. My conclusion: it optimizes for something quite different. Full explanation on LinkedIn 👇

    linkedin.com/posts/nazarovets_

    #ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #OpenScience #CoARA #DORA

  46. The next #RESQUE consultation hour:
    17th of June, 9-10am CEST
    resque.info/news/2026-06-01-co

    The Research Quality Evaluation (RESQUE) framework provides recommendations for responsible #ResearchAssessment for hiring and promotion in #psychology
    www.resque.info

    The session will also highlight specific topics such as applying RESQUE in #ClinicalPsychology with the clinical expansion pack.

    See also previous post for more links and info:
    mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnk

    #ECRs #OpenScience #CoARA #sfDORA

  47. The next #RESQUE consultation hour:
    17th of June, 9-10am CEST
    resque.info/news/2026-06-01-co

    The Research Quality Evaluation (RESQUE) framework provides recommendations for responsible #ResearchAssessment for hiring and promotion in #psychology
    www.resque.info

    The session will also highlight specific topics such as applying RESQUE in #ClinicalPsychology with the clinical expansion pack.

    See also previous post for more links and info:
    mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnk

    #ECRs #OpenScience #CoARA #sfDORA

  48. The next #RESQUE consultation hour:
    17th of June, 9-10am CEST
    resque.info/news/2026-06-01-co

    The Research Quality Evaluation (RESQUE) framework provides recommendations for responsible #ResearchAssessment for hiring and promotion in #psychology
    www.resque.info

    The session will also highlight specific topics such as applying RESQUE in #ClinicalPsychology with the clinical expansion pack.

    See also previous post for more links and info:
    mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnk

    #ECRs #OpenScience #CoARA #sfDORA

  49. The next #RESQUE consultation hour:
    17th of June, 9-10am CEST
    resque.info/news/2026-06-01-co

    The Research Quality Evaluation (RESQUE) framework provides recommendations for responsible #ResearchAssessment for hiring and promotion in #psychology
    www.resque.info

    The session will also highlight specific topics such as applying RESQUE in #ClinicalPsychology with the clinical expansion pack.

    See also previous post for more links and info:
    mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnk

    #ECRs #OpenScience #CoARA #sfDORA

  50. The next #RESQUE consultation hour:
    17th of June, 9-10am CEST
    resque.info/news/2026-06-01-co

    The Research Quality Evaluation (RESQUE) framework provides recommendations for responsible #ResearchAssessment for hiring and promotion in #psychology
    www.resque.info

    The session will also highlight specific topics such as applying RESQUE in #ClinicalPsychology with the clinical expansion pack.

    See also previous post for more links and info:
    mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnk

    #ECRs #OpenScience #CoARA #sfDORA