#researchassessment — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #researchassessment, aggregated by home.social.
-
What is „Research Excellence“? We tried to fill an often empty term (some might call it a bullshit term) with some substance.
https://zenodo.org/records/21670038
(see also the booklet in the downloads for some explaining text).
This work was done together with Katarzyna Nawrot, Rachel Heyard and Davide Crepaldi in the CoARA Working Group „Responsible Metrics and Indicators“.
-
What is „Research Excellence“? We tried to fill an often empty term (some might call it a bullshit term) with some substance.
https://zenodo.org/records/21670038
(see also the booklet in the downloads for some explaining text).
This work was done together with Katarzyna Nawrot, Rachel Heyard and Davide Crepaldi in the CoARA Working Group „Responsible Metrics and Indicators“.
-
What is „Research Excellence“? We tried to fill an often empty term (some might call it a bullshit term) with some substance.
https://zenodo.org/records/21670038
(see also the booklet in the downloads for some explaining text).
This work was done together with Katarzyna Nawrot, Rachel Heyard and Davide Crepaldi in the CoARA Working Group „Responsible Metrics and Indicators“.
-
What is „Research Excellence“? We tried to fill an often empty term (some might call it a bullshit term) with some substance.
https://zenodo.org/records/21670038
(see also the booklet in the downloads for some explaining text).
This work was done together with Katarzyna Nawrot, Rachel Heyard and Davide Crepaldi in the CoARA Working Group „Responsible Metrics and Indicators“.
-
What is „Research Excellence“? We tried to fill an often empty term (some might call it a bullshit term) with some substance.
https://zenodo.org/records/21670038
(see also the booklet in the downloads for some explaining text).
This work was done together with Katarzyna Nawrot, Rachel Heyard and Davide Crepaldi in the CoARA Working Group „Responsible Metrics and Indicators“.
-
Das CoARA German National Chapter lädt ein:
➡️ #CoARA und verantwortungsvolle #Forschungsbewertung: Impulse für ein zukunftsorientiertes Verständnis von Exzellenz
👥 Miriam Kip, Matthias Kiesselbach, @mathijsvleugel
📅 07. Oktober 2026, 13:00 bis 14:00 Uhr
🌐 Online, auf Deutsch
ℹ️ Programm und Anmeldung: https://os.helmholtz.de/veranstaltungen/online-seminare/coara-und-verantwortungsvolle-forschungsbewertung-impulse-fuer-ein-zukunftsorientiertes-verstaendnis-von-exzellenz/
#ResearchAssessment #CoARA #Forschungsbewertung (lmf) -
Das CoARA German National Chapter lädt ein:
➡️ #CoARA und verantwortungsvolle #Forschungsbewertung: Impulse für ein zukunftsorientiertes Verständnis von Exzellenz
👥 Miriam Kip, Matthias Kiesselbach, @mathijsvleugel
📅 07. Oktober 2026, 13:00 bis 14:00 Uhr
🌐 Online, auf Deutsch
ℹ️ Programm und Anmeldung: https://os.helmholtz.de/veranstaltungen/online-seminare/coara-und-verantwortungsvolle-forschungsbewertung-impulse-fuer-ein-zukunftsorientiertes-verstaendnis-von-exzellenz/
#ResearchAssessment #CoARA #Forschungsbewertung (lmf) -
Das CoARA German National Chapter lädt ein:
➡️ #CoARA und verantwortungsvolle #Forschungsbewertung: Impulse für ein zukunftsorientiertes Verständnis von Exzellenz
👥 Miriam Kip, Matthias Kiesselbach, @mathijsvleugel
📅 07. Oktober 2026, 13:00 bis 14:00 Uhr
🌐 Online, auf Deutsch
ℹ️ Programm und Anmeldung: https://os.helmholtz.de/veranstaltungen/online-seminare/coara-und-verantwortungsvolle-forschungsbewertung-impulse-fuer-ein-zukunftsorientiertes-verstaendnis-von-exzellenz/
#ResearchAssessment #CoARA #Forschungsbewertung (lmf) -
Das CoARA German National Chapter lädt ein:
➡️ #CoARA und verantwortungsvolle #Forschungsbewertung: Impulse für ein zukunftsorientiertes Verständnis von Exzellenz
👥 Miriam Kip, Matthias Kiesselbach, @mathijsvleugel
📅 07. Oktober 2026, 13:00 bis 14:00 Uhr
🌐 Online, auf Deutsch
ℹ️ Programm und Anmeldung: https://os.helmholtz.de/veranstaltungen/online-seminare/coara-und-verantwortungsvolle-forschungsbewertung-impulse-fuer-ein-zukunftsorientiertes-verstaendnis-von-exzellenz/
#ResearchAssessment #CoARA #Forschungsbewertung (lmf) -
Das CoARA German National Chapter lädt ein:
➡️ #CoARA und verantwortungsvolle #Forschungsbewertung: Impulse für ein zukunftsorientiertes Verständnis von Exzellenz
👥 Miriam Kip, Matthias Kiesselbach, @mathijsvleugel
📅 07. Oktober 2026, 13:00 bis 14:00 Uhr
🌐 Online, auf Deutsch
ℹ️ Programm und Anmeldung: https://os.helmholtz.de/veranstaltungen/online-seminare/coara-und-verantwortungsvolle-forschungsbewertung-impulse-fuer-ein-zukunftsorientiertes-verstaendnis-von-exzellenz/
#ResearchAssessment #CoARA #Forschungsbewertung (lmf) -
Is Scopus really a curated bibliographic database?
A new Scientometrics study finds 2.7M records without author information, 500K+ records with unknown source titles, inconsistent document types, and even London recorded as an affiliation.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05778-9
A useful reminder: better research assessment starts with understanding and checking the data - not just pressing a button.
#Scopus #Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchEvaluation
-
Is Scopus really a curated bibliographic database?
A new Scientometrics study finds 2.7M records without author information, 500K+ records with unknown source titles, inconsistent document types, and even London recorded as an affiliation.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05778-9
A useful reminder: better research assessment starts with understanding and checking the data - not just pressing a button.
#Scopus #Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchEvaluation
-
Is Scopus really a curated bibliographic database?
A new Scientometrics study finds 2.7M records without author information, 500K+ records with unknown source titles, inconsistent document types, and even London recorded as an affiliation.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05778-9
A useful reminder: better research assessment starts with understanding and checking the data - not just pressing a button.
#Scopus #Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchEvaluation
-
Is Scopus really a curated bibliographic database?
A new Scientometrics study finds 2.7M records without author information, 500K+ records with unknown source titles, inconsistent document types, and even London recorded as an affiliation.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05778-9
A useful reminder: better research assessment starts with understanding and checking the data - not just pressing a button.
#Scopus #Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchEvaluation
-
Is Scopus really a curated bibliographic database?
A new Scientometrics study finds 2.7M records without author information, 500K+ records with unknown source titles, inconsistent document types, and even London recorded as an affiliation.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05778-9
A useful reminder: better research assessment starts with understanding and checking the data - not just pressing a button.
#Scopus #Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchEvaluation
-
An interesting paper by Lutz Bornmann and António Osório on incentives, competition, and undesirable practices in science.
The debate over research metrics is often framed too simply: metrics or no metrics? A better question is: what kind of behaviour does an evaluation system make rational? Good research assessment should make doing good science the rational choice.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44319-026-00900-7
#ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchIntegrity
-
An interesting paper by Lutz Bornmann and António Osório on incentives, competition, and undesirable practices in science.
The debate over research metrics is often framed too simply: metrics or no metrics? A better question is: what kind of behaviour does an evaluation system make rational? Good research assessment should make doing good science the rational choice.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44319-026-00900-7
#ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchIntegrity
-
An interesting paper by Lutz Bornmann and António Osório on incentives, competition, and undesirable practices in science.
The debate over research metrics is often framed too simply: metrics or no metrics? A better question is: what kind of behaviour does an evaluation system make rational? Good research assessment should make doing good science the rational choice.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44319-026-00900-7
#ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchIntegrity
-
An interesting paper by Lutz Bornmann and António Osório on incentives, competition, and undesirable practices in science.
The debate over research metrics is often framed too simply: metrics or no metrics? A better question is: what kind of behaviour does an evaluation system make rational? Good research assessment should make doing good science the rational choice.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44319-026-00900-7
#ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchIntegrity
-
An interesting paper by Lutz Bornmann and António Osório on incentives, competition, and undesirable practices in science.
The debate over research metrics is often framed too simply: metrics or no metrics? A better question is: what kind of behaviour does an evaluation system make rational? Good research assessment should make doing good science the rational choice.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44319-026-00900-7
#ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchIntegrity
-
An interesting evolution from Mike Thelwall. A year ago, he was cautiously exploring whether LLMs could approximate expert research assessment. Today, he reports that ChatGPT-5 mini reached correlations of up to 0.905 with expert REF2021 quality assessments across some disciplines, using a dataset of more than 107,000 UK research articles.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2026-0058
#ResearchEvaluation #Scientometrics #ResearchAssessment #ChatGPT #LLM #AI #SciencePolicy
-
An interesting evolution from Mike Thelwall. A year ago, he was cautiously exploring whether LLMs could approximate expert research assessment. Today, he reports that ChatGPT-5 mini reached correlations of up to 0.905 with expert REF2021 quality assessments across some disciplines, using a dataset of more than 107,000 UK research articles.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2026-0058
#ResearchEvaluation #Scientometrics #ResearchAssessment #ChatGPT #LLM #AI #SciencePolicy
-
An interesting evolution from Mike Thelwall. A year ago, he was cautiously exploring whether LLMs could approximate expert research assessment. Today, he reports that ChatGPT-5 mini reached correlations of up to 0.905 with expert REF2021 quality assessments across some disciplines, using a dataset of more than 107,000 UK research articles.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2026-0058
#ResearchEvaluation #Scientometrics #ResearchAssessment #ChatGPT #LLM #AI #SciencePolicy
-
An interesting evolution from Mike Thelwall. A year ago, he was cautiously exploring whether LLMs could approximate expert research assessment. Today, he reports that ChatGPT-5 mini reached correlations of up to 0.905 with expert REF2021 quality assessments across some disciplines, using a dataset of more than 107,000 UK research articles.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2026-0058
#ResearchEvaluation #Scientometrics #ResearchAssessment #ChatGPT #LLM #AI #SciencePolicy
-
An interesting evolution from Mike Thelwall. A year ago, he was cautiously exploring whether LLMs could approximate expert research assessment. Today, he reports that ChatGPT-5 mini reached correlations of up to 0.905 with expert REF2021 quality assessments across some disciplines, using a dataset of more than 107,000 UK research articles.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2026-0058
#ResearchEvaluation #Scientometrics #ResearchAssessment #ChatGPT #LLM #AI #SciencePolicy
-
A timely new commentary in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology raises an uncomfortable question:
Can anti-metric research assessment reforms backfire in weak academic systems?
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112430
Reducing metrics may work where institutions are strong. But in fragile systems, it may unintentionally increase the influence of favouritism, academic inbreeding, and opaque decision-making.
#ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA #Bibliometrics #MetaResearch #OpenScience #SciencePolicy
-
A timely new commentary in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology raises an uncomfortable question:
Can anti-metric research assessment reforms backfire in weak academic systems?
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112430
Reducing metrics may work where institutions are strong. But in fragile systems, it may unintentionally increase the influence of favouritism, academic inbreeding, and opaque decision-making.
#ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA #Bibliometrics #MetaResearch #OpenScience #SciencePolicy
-
A timely new commentary in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology raises an uncomfortable question:
Can anti-metric research assessment reforms backfire in weak academic systems?
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112430
Reducing metrics may work where institutions are strong. But in fragile systems, it may unintentionally increase the influence of favouritism, academic inbreeding, and opaque decision-making.
#ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA #Bibliometrics #MetaResearch #OpenScience #SciencePolicy
-
A timely new commentary in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology raises an uncomfortable question:
Can anti-metric research assessment reforms backfire in weak academic systems?
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112430
Reducing metrics may work where institutions are strong. But in fragile systems, it may unintentionally increase the influence of favouritism, academic inbreeding, and opaque decision-making.
#ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA #Bibliometrics #MetaResearch #OpenScience #SciencePolicy
-
A timely new commentary in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology raises an uncomfortable question:
Can anti-metric research assessment reforms backfire in weak academic systems?
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112430
Reducing metrics may work where institutions are strong. But in fragile systems, it may unintentionally increase the influence of favouritism, academic inbreeding, and opaque decision-making.
#ResearchAssessment #CoARA #DORA #Bibliometrics #MetaResearch #OpenScience #SciencePolicy
-
🆕 The Helmholtz Modular Curriculum Vitae Template provides a flexible framework for designing CVs for tenure, hiring, and promotion processes. It combines narrative and quantitative elements and supports the selection of relevant evaluation criteria.
-
🆕 The Helmholtz Modular Curriculum Vitae Template provides a flexible framework for designing CVs for tenure, hiring, and promotion processes. It combines narrative and quantitative elements and supports the selection of relevant evaluation criteria.
-
🆕 The Helmholtz Modular Curriculum Vitae Template provides a flexible framework for designing CVs for tenure, hiring, and promotion processes. It combines narrative and quantitative elements and supports the selection of relevant evaluation criteria.
-
🆕 The Helmholtz Modular Curriculum Vitae Template provides a flexible framework for designing CVs for tenure, hiring, and promotion processes. It combines narrative and quantitative elements and supports the selection of relevant evaluation criteria.
-
🆕 The Helmholtz Modular Curriculum Vitae Template provides a flexible framework for designing CVs for tenure, hiring, and promotion processes. It combines narrative and quantitative elements and supports the selection of relevant evaluation criteria.
-
Can a national research ranking claim to reward the "most productive researchers" while capping the value of additional scientific output?
I looked closely at the formula behind Ukraine's new government-funded ranking. My conclusion: it optimizes for something quite different. Full explanation on LinkedIn 👇
#ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #OpenScience #CoARA #DORA
-
Can a national research ranking claim to reward the "most productive researchers" while capping the value of additional scientific output?
I looked closely at the formula behind Ukraine's new government-funded ranking. My conclusion: it optimizes for something quite different. Full explanation on LinkedIn 👇
#ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #OpenScience #CoARA #DORA
-
Can a national research ranking claim to reward the "most productive researchers" while capping the value of additional scientific output?
I looked closely at the formula behind Ukraine's new government-funded ranking. My conclusion: it optimizes for something quite different. Full explanation on LinkedIn 👇
#ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #OpenScience #CoARA #DORA
-
Can a national research ranking claim to reward the "most productive researchers" while capping the value of additional scientific output?
I looked closely at the formula behind Ukraine's new government-funded ranking. My conclusion: it optimizes for something quite different. Full explanation on LinkedIn 👇
#ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #OpenScience #CoARA #DORA
-
Can a national research ranking claim to reward the "most productive researchers" while capping the value of additional scientific output?
I looked closely at the formula behind Ukraine's new government-funded ranking. My conclusion: it optimizes for something quite different. Full explanation on LinkedIn 👇
#ResearchEvaluation #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #OpenScience #CoARA #DORA
-
Towards a more informed and balanced use of scientific performance metrics
#JaapJADenissen #KlaasSijtsma #metrics #ResearchAssessment #WilMPVanDerAalst
-
The next #RESQUE consultation hour:
17th of June, 9-10am CEST
https://www.resque.info/news/2026-06-01-consultation%20hours.htmlThe Research Quality Evaluation (RESQUE) framework provides recommendations for responsible #ResearchAssessment for hiring and promotion in #psychology
www.resque.infoThe session will also highlight specific topics such as applying RESQUE in #ClinicalPsychology with the clinical expansion pack.
See also previous post for more links and info:
https://mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnke/116652740649620274 -
The next #RESQUE consultation hour:
17th of June, 9-10am CEST
https://www.resque.info/news/2026-06-01-consultation%20hours.htmlThe Research Quality Evaluation (RESQUE) framework provides recommendations for responsible #ResearchAssessment for hiring and promotion in #psychology
www.resque.infoThe session will also highlight specific topics such as applying RESQUE in #ClinicalPsychology with the clinical expansion pack.
See also previous post for more links and info:
https://mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnke/116652740649620274 -
The next #RESQUE consultation hour:
17th of June, 9-10am CEST
https://www.resque.info/news/2026-06-01-consultation%20hours.htmlThe Research Quality Evaluation (RESQUE) framework provides recommendations for responsible #ResearchAssessment for hiring and promotion in #psychology
www.resque.infoThe session will also highlight specific topics such as applying RESQUE in #ClinicalPsychology with the clinical expansion pack.
See also previous post for more links and info:
https://mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnke/116652740649620274 -
The next #RESQUE consultation hour:
17th of June, 9-10am CEST
https://www.resque.info/news/2026-06-01-consultation%20hours.htmlThe Research Quality Evaluation (RESQUE) framework provides recommendations for responsible #ResearchAssessment for hiring and promotion in #psychology
www.resque.infoThe session will also highlight specific topics such as applying RESQUE in #ClinicalPsychology with the clinical expansion pack.
See also previous post for more links and info:
https://mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnke/116652740649620274 -
The next #RESQUE consultation hour:
17th of June, 9-10am CEST
https://www.resque.info/news/2026-06-01-consultation%20hours.htmlThe Research Quality Evaluation (RESQUE) framework provides recommendations for responsible #ResearchAssessment for hiring and promotion in #psychology
www.resque.infoThe session will also highlight specific topics such as applying RESQUE in #ClinicalPsychology with the clinical expansion pack.
See also previous post for more links and info:
https://mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnke/116652740649620274 -
📢 Published
German #CoARA National Chapter Workshop Report
on the connection between #ResearchAssessment reforms and #excellence in research👉 EN: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20348689
👉 DE: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20348630 -
📢 Published
German #CoARA National Chapter Workshop Report
on the connection between #ResearchAssessment reforms and #excellence in research👉 EN: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20348689
👉 DE: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20348630 -
📢 Published
German #CoARA National Chapter Workshop Report
on the connection between #ResearchAssessment reforms and #excellence in research👉 EN: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20348689
👉 DE: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20348630 -
📢 Published
German #CoARA National Chapter Workshop Report
on the connection between #ResearchAssessment reforms and #excellence in research👉 EN: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20348689
👉 DE: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20348630 -
📢 Published
German #CoARA National Chapter Workshop Report
on the connection between #ResearchAssessment reforms and #excellence in research👉 EN: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20348689
👉 DE: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20348630 -
You can read more about #RESQUE and community responses in this excellent issue of #MetaPsychology
https://conferences.lnu.se/index.php/metapsychology/issue/view/297Topic-specific expansion packs are developing, eg., a #PrePrint for #ClinicalPsychology and #PsychotherapyResearch
https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6gwr8_v1 -
You can read more about #RESQUE and community responses in this excellent issue of #MetaPsychology
https://conferences.lnu.se/index.php/metapsychology/issue/view/297Topic-specific expansion packs are developing, eg., a #PrePrint for #ClinicalPsychology and #PsychotherapyResearch
https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6gwr8_v1 -
You can read more about #RESQUE and community responses in this excellent issue of #MetaPsychology
https://conferences.lnu.se/index.php/metapsychology/issue/view/297Topic-specific expansion packs are developing, eg., a #PrePrint for #ClinicalPsychology and #PsychotherapyResearch
https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6gwr8_v1 -
You can read more about #RESQUE and community responses in this excellent issue of #MetaPsychology
https://conferences.lnu.se/index.php/metapsychology/issue/view/297Topic-specific expansion packs are developing, eg., a #PrePrint for #ClinicalPsychology and #PsychotherapyResearch
https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6gwr8_v1 -
Another opportunity to work w #RESQUE
The Research Quality Evaluation framework provides recommendations for responsible research assessment beyond typical metrics for hiring and promotion in #psychology:
www.resque.infoMaybe of interest for other areas as well?
-
Another opportunity to work w #RESQUE
The Research Quality Evaluation framework provides recommendations for responsible research assessment beyond typical metrics for hiring and promotion in #psychology:
www.resque.infoMaybe of interest for other areas as well?
-
Another opportunity to work w #RESQUE
The Research Quality Evaluation framework provides recommendations for responsible research assessment beyond typical metrics for hiring and promotion in #psychology:
www.resque.infoMaybe of interest for other areas as well?
-
Another opportunity to work w #RESQUE
The Research Quality Evaluation framework provides recommendations for responsible research assessment beyond typical metrics for hiring and promotion in #psychology:
www.resque.infoMaybe of interest for other areas as well?
-
Another opportunity to work w #RESQUE
The Research Quality Evaluation framework provides recommendations for responsible research assessment beyond typical metrics for hiring and promotion in #psychology:
www.resque.infoMaybe of interest for other areas as well?