home.social

#impactfactor — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #impactfactor, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Taking journal glorification to a new level? From a newsletter announcing new research, the highlight was "Nature Portfolio" and journal rank. The only hint we get about the actual research is a generic title. #academia @sociology #publishing #impactfactor #career #signalling #journal #academicchatter

  2. RE: social.sciences.re/@TheMetaNew

    #PublierLaScience Très bon article pour faire le point sur l'indexation des revues dans le #WebOfScience et sur l' #impactfactor. Avec qq exemples de revues très prolixes (25 000 articles en 1 an!).. ou qui se citent elles-mêmes à 93%...

  3. RE: social.sciences.re/@TheMetaNew

    #PublierLaScience Très bon article pour faire le point sur l'indexation des revues dans le #WebOfScience et sur l' #impactfactor. Avec qq exemples de revues très prolixes (25 000 articles en 1 an!).. ou qui se citent elles-mêmes à 93%...

  4. 🟢 Privées d'impact factor

    Un indicateur central malgré ses défauts, dont le retrait peut faire voler en éclat la réputation d’une revue et peut-être la vôtre avec

    themeta.news/ces-revues-qui-pe

    #VeilleESR #impactfactor

  5. Weekend reads: An alternative to the #impactfactor in China; the clinical trials of six ‘superretractors’; Retraction Watch goes to Capitol Hill – #RetractionWatch

    China proposes a new way to measure academic influence in a departure from impact factor.”

    retractionwatch.com/2026/04/18

  6. Weekend reads: An alternative to the #impactfactor in China; the clinical trials of six ‘superretractors’; Retraction Watch goes to Capitol Hill – #RetractionWatch

    China proposes a new way to measure academic influence in a departure from impact factor.”

    retractionwatch.com/2026/04/18

  7. Weekend reads: An alternative to the #impactfactor in China; the clinical trials of six ‘superretractors’; Retraction Watch goes to Capitol Hill – #RetractionWatch

    China proposes a new way to measure academic influence in a departure from impact factor.”

    retractionwatch.com/2026/04/18

  8. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B is a #peerreviewed #scientificJournal that covers research on several fields of material chemistry (macromolecules, soft matter, and #surfactants) as well as #statisticalMechanics, #thermodynamics, and #biophysicalChemistry. It has been published weekly since 1997 by the #AmericanChemicalSociety. According to the #JournalCitationReports, the journal had an #impactFactor of 3.5 for 2023. Due to the growing amount of research in the fields it covers.

  9. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B is a #peerreviewed #scientificJournal that covers research on several fields of material chemistry (macromolecules, soft matter, and #surfactants) as well as #statisticalMechanics, #thermodynamics, and #biophysicalChemistry. It has been published weekly since 1997 by the #AmericanChemicalSociety. According to the #JournalCitationReports, the journal had an #impactFactor of 3.5 for 2023. Due to the growing amount of research in the fields it covers.

  10. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B is a #peerreviewed #scientificJournal that covers research on several fields of material chemistry (macromolecules, soft matter, and #surfactants) as well as #statisticalMechanics, #thermodynamics, and #biophysicalChemistry. It has been published weekly since 1997 by the #AmericanChemicalSociety. According to the #JournalCitationReports, the journal had an #impactFactor of 3.5 for 2023. Due to the growing amount of research in the fields it covers.

  11. Bringt KI die Wissenschaft in Gefahr? - 3sat-Mediathek

    3sat.de/wissen/nano/251104-sen

    "Es gibt immer mehr gefälschte Studien und Fake-Publikationen - auch in Fachzeitschriften. Künstliche Intelligenz macht das Fälschen leichter. "

    Interview mit Bernhard Sabel (Dazu: Stockholmer Erklärung
    Forschende fordern Reformen im Publikationssystem: forschung-und-lehre.de/forschu)

    #FakeScience #PaperMills #ImpactFactor #PublishOrPerish #jounsls #ki #ai #3SatNano #StockholmerErklärung #StockholmDeclaration

  12. Bringt KI die Wissenschaft in Gefahr? - 3sat-Mediathek

    3sat.de/wissen/nano/251104-sen

    "Es gibt immer mehr gefälschte Studien und Fake-Publikationen - auch in Fachzeitschriften. Künstliche Intelligenz macht das Fälschen leichter. "

    Interview mit Bernhard Sabel (Dazu: Stockholmer Erklärung
    Forschende fordern Reformen im Publikationssystem: forschung-und-lehre.de/forschu)

    #FakeScience #PaperMills #ImpactFactor #PublishOrPerish #jounsls #ki #ai #3SatNano #StockholmerErklärung #StockholmDeclaration

  13. Bringt KI die Wissenschaft in Gefahr? - 3sat-Mediathek

    3sat.de/wissen/nano/251104-sen

    "Es gibt immer mehr gefälschte Studien und Fake-Publikationen - auch in Fachzeitschriften. Künstliche Intelligenz macht das Fälschen leichter. "

    Interview mit Bernhard Sabel (Dazu: Stockholmer Erklärung
    Forschende fordern Reformen im Publikationssystem: forschung-und-lehre.de/forschu)

    #FakeScience #PaperMills #ImpactFactor #PublishOrPerish #jounsls #ki #ai #3SatNano #StockholmerErklärung #StockholmDeclaration

  14. Bringt KI die Wissenschaft in Gefahr? - 3sat-Mediathek

    3sat.de/wissen/nano/251104-sen

    "Es gibt immer mehr gefälschte Studien und Fake-Publikationen - auch in Fachzeitschriften. Künstliche Intelligenz macht das Fälschen leichter. "

    Interview mit Bernhard Sabel (Dazu: Stockholmer Erklärung
    Forschende fordern Reformen im Publikationssystem: forschung-und-lehre.de/forschu)

    #FakeScience #PaperMills #ImpactFactor #PublishOrPerish #jounsls #ki #ai #3SatNano #StockholmerErklärung #StockholmDeclaration

  15. Bringt KI die Wissenschaft in Gefahr? - 3sat-Mediathek

    3sat.de/wissen/nano/251104-sen

    "Es gibt immer mehr gefälschte Studien und Fake-Publikationen - auch in Fachzeitschriften. Künstliche Intelligenz macht das Fälschen leichter. "

    Interview mit Bernhard Sabel (Dazu: Stockholmer Erklärung
    Forschende fordern Reformen im Publikationssystem: forschung-und-lehre.de/forschu)

    #FakeScience #PaperMills #ImpactFactor #PublishOrPerish #jounsls #ki #ai #3SatNano #StockholmerErklärung #StockholmDeclaration

  16. 📘 Accepted #Journal #Article Announcement

    The article “#GenerativeAI and the #UrbanAI Policy Challenges Ahead: Trustworthy for Whom?” has been accepted in the journal Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (#TGPPP, Emerald Publishing).
    📊 #ImpactFactor 2.6 | #CiteScore 5.0

    🔗 See the #AAM #AuthoredAcceptedManuscript) via @ssrn papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf

  17. 📘 Accepted #Journal #Article Announcement

    The article “#GenerativeAI and the #UrbanAI Policy Challenges Ahead: Trustworthy for Whom?” has been accepted in the journal Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (#TGPPP, Emerald Publishing).
    📊 #ImpactFactor 2.6 | #CiteScore 5.0

    🔗 See the #AAM #AuthoredAcceptedManuscript) via @ssrn papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf

  18. 📘 Accepted #Journal #Article Announcement

    The article “#GenerativeAI and the #UrbanAI Policy Challenges Ahead: Trustworthy for Whom?” has been accepted in the journal Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (#TGPPP, Emerald Publishing).
    📊 #ImpactFactor 2.6 | #CiteScore 5.0

    🔗 See the #AAM #AuthoredAcceptedManuscript) via @ssrn papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf

  19. 📘 Accepted #Journal #Article Announcement

    The article “#GenerativeAI and the #UrbanAI Policy Challenges Ahead: Trustworthy for Whom?” has been accepted in the journal Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (#TGPPP, Emerald Publishing).
    📊 #ImpactFactor 2.6 | #CiteScore 5.0

    🔗 See the #AAM #AuthoredAcceptedManuscript) via @ssrn papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf

  20. 📘 Accepted #Journal #Article Announcement

    The article “#GenerativeAI and the #UrbanAI Policy Challenges Ahead: Trustworthy for Whom?” has been accepted in the journal Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (#TGPPP, Emerald Publishing).
    📊 #ImpactFactor 2.6 | #CiteScore 5.0

    🔗 See the #AAM #AuthoredAcceptedManuscript) via @ssrn papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf

  21. Wie kann man Forschungsleistung fairer bewerten als mit Kennzahlen a la #Impactfactor & Co.? Am @bih_charite entwickelt Miriam Kip alternative Indikatoren und implementiert sie bspw. in Lebensläufen für Berufungsverfahren. Mario Rembold sprach mit ihr: laborjournal.de/rubric/essays/

  22. Damian Pattinson of @eLife (and my former boss at PLOS ONE) at The Royal Society's Future of Scientific Publishing conference describes the devastating effect on their submissions of Clarivate removing their Impact Factor due to their change in peer review model, then asks why other journals, including Science, don't renounce their own IFs.

    #SciComm #JournalPublishing #ImpactFactor #Clarivate #WebOfScience #PeerReview #TheRoyalSociety #FutureOfScientificPublishing #Citations #Bibliometrics #ResearchImpact #ResearchAssessment

  23. The killer quote! Prestigious institutions and prestigious journals drive irreproducibility in the life sciences - well, at least in this particular sample.

    biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

    #reproducibility #impactfactor

  24. If you share your journals' impact factors, use the 5 year indicator. The one year impact factors fluctuate, are sensitive to minor citation differences. The 5 year factors are more stable and say more about the journal. #ImpactFactor #CiteScore #JCI #academicchatter

  25. If you share your journals' impact factors, use the 5 year indicator. The one year impact factors fluctuate, are sensitive to minor citation differences. The 5 year factors are more stable and say more about the journal. #ImpactFactor #CiteScore #JCI #academicchatter

  26. If you share your journals' impact factors, use the 5 year indicator. The one year impact factors fluctuate, are sensitive to minor citation differences. The 5 year factors are more stable and say more about the journal. #ImpactFactor #CiteScore #JCI #academicchatter

  27. If you share your journals' impact factors, use the 5 year indicator. The one year impact factors fluctuate, are sensitive to minor citation differences. The 5 year factors are more stable and say more about the journal. #ImpactFactor #CiteScore #JCI #academicchatter

  28. If you share your journals' impact factors, use the 5 year indicator. The one year impact factors fluctuate, are sensitive to minor citation differences. The 5 year factors are more stable and say more about the journal. #ImpactFactor #CiteScore #JCI #academicchatter

  29. At #ISSI2025, Mike Thelwall suggested that the Leiden Manifesto should be updated to reflect the rise of large language models (LLMs) in research assessment.

    👉 issi2025.iiap.sci.am/proceedin (P. 71-80)

    He proposed four new principles — calling for transparent prompts, awareness of #LLM instability, cost-benefit considerations, and a reminder that LLM scores are not evidence of scientific contribution.

    #Scientometrics #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #ImpactFactor

  30. At #ISSI2025, Mike Thelwall suggested that the Leiden Manifesto should be updated to reflect the rise of large language models (LLMs) in research assessment.

    👉 issi2025.iiap.sci.am/proceedin (P. 71-80)

    He proposed four new principles — calling for transparent prompts, awareness of #LLM instability, cost-benefit considerations, and a reminder that LLM scores are not evidence of scientific contribution.

    #Scientometrics #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #ImpactFactor

  31. At #ISSI2025, Mike Thelwall suggested that the Leiden Manifesto should be updated to reflect the rise of large language models (LLMs) in research assessment.

    👉 issi2025.iiap.sci.am/proceedin (P. 71-80)

    He proposed four new principles — calling for transparent prompts, awareness of #LLM instability, cost-benefit considerations, and a reminder that LLM scores are not evidence of scientific contribution.

    #Scientometrics #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #ImpactFactor

  32. At #ISSI2025, Mike Thelwall suggested that the Leiden Manifesto should be updated to reflect the rise of large language models (LLMs) in research assessment.

    👉 issi2025.iiap.sci.am/proceedin (P. 71-80)

    He proposed four new principles — calling for transparent prompts, awareness of #LLM instability, cost-benefit considerations, and a reminder that LLM scores are not evidence of scientific contribution.

    #Scientometrics #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #ImpactFactor

  33. At #ISSI2025, Mike Thelwall suggested that the Leiden Manifesto should be updated to reflect the rise of large language models (LLMs) in research assessment.

    👉 issi2025.iiap.sci.am/proceedin (P. 71-80)

    He proposed four new principles — calling for transparent prompts, awareness of #LLM instability, cost-benefit considerations, and a reminder that LLM scores are not evidence of scientific contribution.

    #Scientometrics #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #ImpactFactor

  34. We are so excited to share you this good news that 2024 Impact Factor of NGIB is 6.5, ranking 52/182 in category of Energy&Fuels! Thank you all supporters! #impactfactor #naturalgas #journalmetrics #openaccess #webofscience #ESCI #SCIE

  35. We are so excited to share you this good news that 2024 Impact Factor of NGIB is 6.5, ranking 52/182 in category of Energy&Fuels! Thank you all supporters! #impactfactor #naturalgas #journalmetrics #openaccess #webofscience #ESCI #SCIE

  36. We are so excited to share you this good news that 2024 Impact Factor of NGIB is 6.5, ranking 52/182 in category of Energy&Fuels! Thank you all supporters! #impactfactor #naturalgas #journalmetrics #openaccess #webofscience #ESCI #SCIE

  37. We are so excited to share you this good news that 2024 Impact Factor of NGIB is 6.5, ranking 52/182 in category of Energy&Fuels! Thank you all supporters! #impactfactor #naturalgas #journalmetrics #openaccess #webofscience #ESCI #SCIE

  38. We are so excited to share you this good news that 2024 Impact Factor of NGIB is 6.5, ranking 52/182 in category of Energy&Fuels! Thank you all supporters! #impactfactor #naturalgas #journalmetrics #openaccess #webofscience #ESCI #SCIE

  39. Over 100 organisations still consider eLife papers when evaluating research contributions since losing our Impact Factor: elifesciences.org/inside-elife

    Help us rally more community support for research reform and let us know your funder or institution’s stance on the #ImpactFactor 💬

  40. I enjoyed and appreciated this editorial on the benefits of society journals vs for profit ones, for the academic community.

    I was a bit perturbed though by the mention of journal impact factors. I thought academic communities were trying to move away from using this? Is it all just talk and actually this is an honest editorial that they are not?

    academic.oup.com/mbe/article/4

    #Publishing #Academia #ImpactFactor