home.social

#earthobservation — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #earthobservation, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Antarctic ozone hole reaches 25 million km² as growth accelerates

    The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) reported that the Antarctic ozone hole expanded rapidly in the first half…
    #NewsBeep #News #Science #CA #Canada #climatechange #climatemodelling #Earthobservation
    newsbeep.com/ca/897816/

  2. Antarctic ozone hole reaches 25 million km² as growth accelerates

    The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) reported that the Antarctic ozone hole expanded rapidly in the first half…
    #NewsBeep #News #Science #AU #Australia #Climatechange #climatemodelling #Earthobservation
    newsbeep.com/au/893976/

  3. ESA launches two climate observation satellites.

    The European Space Agency has put two satellites into orbit to take a closer look at the impact of climate change. One of them will focus particularly on plant life.

    mediafaro.org/article/20260915

    #ESA #ClimateChange #Space #Satellites #Aerospace #EarthObservation #Europe #Science

  4. The United States Is Replacing Every Official Latitude, Longitude And Height It Publishes, Existing Coordinates Will Move By As Much As Four Metres, And The Million Survey Marks In The Ground Will No Longer Be What The System Is Measured From
    --
    alturl.com/wfsc5 <--- shared technical article
    --
    beta.ngs.noaa.gov/ <-- shared NGS NSRS Beta Product Release Site
    --
    alturl.com/wuzcg <-- shared NOAA/NGS β SPCS2022 online interactive map
    --
    geodesy.noaa.gov/ <-- shared NOAA National Geodetic Survey (NGS) home page
    --
    crops.extension.iastate.edu/po <-- shared technical article, ‘What You Need to Know About the 202[7] Datum Shift (GPS)’
    --
    geodesy.noaa.gov/GRAV-D/ <-- shared Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D) home page
    --
    federalregister.gov/documents/ <-- shared US Federal Register page, ‘Updated Implementation Timeline for the Modernized National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)’
    --
    “The National Geodetic Survey has spent years building a replacement for the reference system that fixes every published position in the country. New geodetic-control submissions into the old system stop being accepted after January 13, 2027…
    Every official latitude, longitude and height published in the United States is going to change, by as much as four metres. The ground being described will not have moved at all. What is being replaced is the reference system those numbers are counted from.
    The National Geodetic Survey is retiring the North American Datum of 1983 [NAD83] and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 [NGVD88.] Those are the horizontal and vertical reference systems that currently underpin surveying, flood mapping, construction and aviation across the country. In their place will come four new terrestrial reference frames and one new geopotential datum. The agency has kept the national reference system since its predecessor, the Survey of the Coast, was founded in 1807.
    || The reference surface is what is changing ||
    ... A coordinate is not a property of a place; it is a measurement of that place against an agreed reference surface. The United States is changing the reference surface. The four metres is the gap between two descriptions of the same unmoved point.
    That figure is not uniform either, and the agency does not present it as a single national number. Its guidance says the magnitude of change depends on which datum a user currently works in, where in the country they are, and which epoch the new coordinates refer to. Four metres is the outer edge of the range. NGS publishes separate maps for ellipsoid height change, orthometric height change, and horizontal change on the North American and Pacific plates…”

    @USGS @FGDC @ngs @NOAA

  5. The United States Is Replacing Every Official Latitude, Longitude And Height It Publishes, Existing Coordinates Will Move By As Much As Four Metres, And The Million Survey Marks In The Ground Will No Longer Be What The System Is Measured From
    --
    alturl.com/wfsc5 <--- shared technical article
    --
    beta.ngs.noaa.gov/ <-- shared NGS NSRS Beta Product Release Site
    --
    alturl.com/wuzcg <-- shared NOAA/NGS β SPCS2022 online interactive map
    --
    geodesy.noaa.gov/ <-- shared NOAA National Geodetic Survey (NGS) home page
    --
    crops.extension.iastate.edu/po <-- shared technical article, ‘What You Need to Know About the 202[7] Datum Shift (GPS)’
    --
    geodesy.noaa.gov/GRAV-D/ <-- shared Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D) home page
    --
    federalregister.gov/documents/ <-- shared US Federal Register page, ‘Updated Implementation Timeline for the Modernized National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)’
    --
    “The National Geodetic Survey has spent years building a replacement for the reference system that fixes every published position in the country. New geodetic-control submissions into the old system stop being accepted after January 13, 2027…
    Every official latitude, longitude and height published in the United States is going to change, by as much as four metres. The ground being described will not have moved at all. What is being replaced is the reference system those numbers are counted from.
    The National Geodetic Survey is retiring the North American Datum of 1983 [NAD83] and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 [NGVD88.] Those are the horizontal and vertical reference systems that currently underpin surveying, flood mapping, construction and aviation across the country. In their place will come four new terrestrial reference frames and one new geopotential datum. The agency has kept the national reference system since its predecessor, the Survey of the Coast, was founded in 1807.
    || The reference surface is what is changing ||
    ... A coordinate is not a property of a place; it is a measurement of that place against an agreed reference surface. The United States is changing the reference surface. The four metres is the gap between two descriptions of the same unmoved point.
    That figure is not uniform either, and the agency does not present it as a single national number. Its guidance says the magnitude of change depends on which datum a user currently works in, where in the country they are, and which epoch the new coordinates refer to. Four metres is the outer edge of the range. NGS publishes separate maps for ellipsoid height change, orthometric height change, and horizontal change on the North American and Pacific plates…”
    #GEOID2022 #GeospatialDataAct2018 #GRAVD #GeMS #NAPGD2022 #NSRS #GNSS #GPS #earthfacing #earthobservation #USA #Nation #NATRF2022 #PATRF2022 #CATRF2022 #MATRF2022 #NAPGD2022 #GEOID2022 #SPCS2022 #geoid #latitude #longitude #height #elevation #reference #datums #coordinates #XYZ #control #GIS #spatial #mapping #fedscience #fedservice
    @USGS @FGDC @ngs @NOAA

  6. The United States Is Replacing Every Official Latitude, Longitude And Height It Publishes, Existing Coordinates Will Move By As Much As Four Metres, And The Million Survey Marks In The Ground Will No Longer Be What The System Is Measured From
    --
    alturl.com/wfsc5 <--- shared technical article
    --
    beta.ngs.noaa.gov/ <-- shared NGS NSRS Beta Product Release Site
    --
    alturl.com/wuzcg <-- shared NOAA/NGS β SPCS2022 online interactive map
    --
    geodesy.noaa.gov/ <-- shared NOAA National Geodetic Survey (NGS) home page
    --
    crops.extension.iastate.edu/po <-- shared technical article, ‘What You Need to Know About the 202[7] Datum Shift (GPS)’
    --
    geodesy.noaa.gov/GRAV-D/ <-- shared Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D) home page
    --
    federalregister.gov/documents/ <-- shared US Federal Register page, ‘Updated Implementation Timeline for the Modernized National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)’
    --
    “The National Geodetic Survey has spent years building a replacement for the reference system that fixes every published position in the country. New geodetic-control submissions into the old system stop being accepted after January 13, 2027…
    Every official latitude, longitude and height published in the United States is going to change, by as much as four metres. The ground being described will not have moved at all. What is being replaced is the reference system those numbers are counted from.
    The National Geodetic Survey is retiring the North American Datum of 1983 [NAD83] and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 [NGVD88.] Those are the horizontal and vertical reference systems that currently underpin surveying, flood mapping, construction and aviation across the country. In their place will come four new terrestrial reference frames and one new geopotential datum. The agency has kept the national reference system since its predecessor, the Survey of the Coast, was founded in 1807.
    || The reference surface is what is changing ||
    ... A coordinate is not a property of a place; it is a measurement of that place against an agreed reference surface. The United States is changing the reference surface. The four metres is the gap between two descriptions of the same unmoved point.
    That figure is not uniform either, and the agency does not present it as a single national number. Its guidance says the magnitude of change depends on which datum a user currently works in, where in the country they are, and which epoch the new coordinates refer to. Four metres is the outer edge of the range. NGS publishes separate maps for ellipsoid height change, orthometric height change, and horizontal change on the North American and Pacific plates…”
    #GEOID2022 #GeospatialDataAct2018 #GRAVD #GeMS #NAPGD2022 #NSRS #GNSS #GPS #earthfacing #earthobservation #USA #Nation #NATRF2022 #PATRF2022 #CATRF2022 #MATRF2022 #NAPGD2022 #GEOID2022 #SPCS2022 #geoid #latitude #longitude #height #elevation #reference #datums #coordinates #XYZ #control #GIS #spatial #mapping #fedscience #fedservice
    @USGS @FGDC @ngs @NOAA

  7. The United States Is Replacing Every Official Latitude, Longitude And Height It Publishes, Existing Coordinates Will Move By As Much As Four Metres, And The Million Survey Marks In The Ground Will No Longer Be What The System Is Measured From
    --
    alturl.com/wfsc5 <--- shared technical article
    --
    beta.ngs.noaa.gov/ <-- shared NGS NSRS Beta Product Release Site
    --
    alturl.com/wuzcg <-- shared NOAA/NGS β SPCS2022 online interactive map
    --
    geodesy.noaa.gov/ <-- shared NOAA National Geodetic Survey (NGS) home page
    --
    crops.extension.iastate.edu/po <-- shared technical article, ‘What You Need to Know About the 202[7] Datum Shift (GPS)’
    --
    geodesy.noaa.gov/GRAV-D/ <-- shared Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D) home page
    --
    federalregister.gov/documents/ <-- shared US Federal Register page, ‘Updated Implementation Timeline for the Modernized National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)’
    --
    “The National Geodetic Survey has spent years building a replacement for the reference system that fixes every published position in the country. New geodetic-control submissions into the old system stop being accepted after January 13, 2027…
    Every official latitude, longitude and height published in the United States is going to change, by as much as four metres. The ground being described will not have moved at all. What is being replaced is the reference system those numbers are counted from.
    The National Geodetic Survey is retiring the North American Datum of 1983 [NAD83] and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 [NGVD88.] Those are the horizontal and vertical reference systems that currently underpin surveying, flood mapping, construction and aviation across the country. In their place will come four new terrestrial reference frames and one new geopotential datum. The agency has kept the national reference system since its predecessor, the Survey of the Coast, was founded in 1807.
    || The reference surface is what is changing ||
    ... A coordinate is not a property of a place; it is a measurement of that place against an agreed reference surface. The United States is changing the reference surface. The four metres is the gap between two descriptions of the same unmoved point.
    That figure is not uniform either, and the agency does not present it as a single national number. Its guidance says the magnitude of change depends on which datum a user currently works in, where in the country they are, and which epoch the new coordinates refer to. Four metres is the outer edge of the range. NGS publishes separate maps for ellipsoid height change, orthometric height change, and horizontal change on the North American and Pacific plates…”
    #GEOID2022 #GeospatialDataAct2018 #GRAVD #GeMS #NAPGD2022 #NSRS #GNSS #GPS #earthfacing #earthobservation #USA #Nation #NATRF2022 #PATRF2022 #CATRF2022 #MATRF2022 #NAPGD2022 #GEOID2022 #SPCS2022 #geoid #latitude #longitude #height #elevation #reference #datums #coordinates #XYZ #control #GIS #spatial #mapping #fedscience #fedservice
    @USGS @FGDC @ngs @NOAA

  8. The United States Is Replacing Every Official Latitude, Longitude And Height It Publishes, Existing Coordinates Will Move By As Much As Four Metres, And The Million Survey Marks In The Ground Will No Longer Be What The System Is Measured From
    --
    alturl.com/wfsc5 <--- shared technical article
    --
    beta.ngs.noaa.gov/ <-- shared NGS NSRS Beta Product Release Site
    --
    alturl.com/wuzcg <-- shared NOAA/NGS β SPCS2022 online interactive map
    --
    geodesy.noaa.gov/ <-- shared NOAA National Geodetic Survey (NGS) home page
    --
    crops.extension.iastate.edu/po <-- shared technical article, ‘What You Need to Know About the 202[7] Datum Shift (GPS)’
    --
    geodesy.noaa.gov/GRAV-D/ <-- shared Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D) home page
    --
    federalregister.gov/documents/ <-- shared US Federal Register page, ‘Updated Implementation Timeline for the Modernized National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)’
    --
    “The National Geodetic Survey has spent years building a replacement for the reference system that fixes every published position in the country. New geodetic-control submissions into the old system stop being accepted after January 13, 2027…
    Every official latitude, longitude and height published in the United States is going to change, by as much as four metres. The ground being described will not have moved at all. What is being replaced is the reference system those numbers are counted from.
    The National Geodetic Survey is retiring the North American Datum of 1983 [NAD83] and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 [NGVD88.] Those are the horizontal and vertical reference systems that currently underpin surveying, flood mapping, construction and aviation across the country. In their place will come four new terrestrial reference frames and one new geopotential datum. The agency has kept the national reference system since its predecessor, the Survey of the Coast, was founded in 1807.
    || The reference surface is what is changing ||
    ... A coordinate is not a property of a place; it is a measurement of that place against an agreed reference surface. The United States is changing the reference surface. The four metres is the gap between two descriptions of the same unmoved point.
    That figure is not uniform either, and the agency does not present it as a single national number. Its guidance says the magnitude of change depends on which datum a user currently works in, where in the country they are, and which epoch the new coordinates refer to. Four metres is the outer edge of the range. NGS publishes separate maps for ellipsoid height change, orthometric height change, and horizontal change on the North American and Pacific plates…”
    #GEOID2022 #GeospatialDataAct2018 #GRAVD #GeMS #NAPGD2022 #NSRS #GNSS #GPS #earthfacing #earthobservation #USA #Nation #NATRF2022 #PATRF2022 #CATRF2022 #MATRF2022 #NAPGD2022 #GEOID2022 #SPCS2022 #geoid #latitude #longitude #height #elevation #reference #datums #coordinates #XYZ #control #GIS #spatial #mapping #fedscience #fedservice
    @USGS @FGDC @ngs @NOAA

  9. Spying on "reconnaissance spacecraft" in geostationary orbit (GEO), is gaining momentum.

    Company Astranis building Perceptor spacecraft designed to capture satellite activity in GEO orbits.

    FYI, GEO is typically 35,786kms/22,236 miles above Earth ... popular for communications, weather and "reconnaissance" satellites. space.com/space-exploration/sa #Space #Satellite #GEO #GeostationaryOrbit #Perceptor #Astranis #Spacecraft #Reconnaissance #Sensors #OpticalSensors #USSF #EarthObservation #USGov

  10. Spying on "reconnaissance spacecraft" in geostationary orbit (GEO), is gaining momentum.

    Company Astranis building Perceptor spacecraft designed to capture satellite activity in GEO orbits.

    FYI, GEO is typically 35,786kms/22,236 miles above Earth ... popular for communications, weather and "reconnaissance" satellites. space.com/space-exploration/sa #Space #Satellite #GEO #GeostationaryOrbit #Perceptor #Astranis #Spacecraft #Reconnaissance #Sensors #OpticalSensors #USSF #EarthObservation #USGov

  11. Spying on "reconnaissance spacecraft" in geostationary orbit (GEO), is gaining momentum.

    Company Astranis building Perceptor spacecraft designed to capture satellite activity in GEO orbits.

    FYI, GEO is typically 35,786kms/22,236 miles above Earth ... popular for communications, weather and "reconnaissance" satellites. space.com/space-exploration/sa #Space #Satellite #GEO #GeostationaryOrbit #Perceptor #Astranis #Spacecraft #Reconnaissance #Sensors #OpticalSensors #USSF #EarthObservation #USGov

  12. Spying on "reconnaissance spacecraft" in geostationary orbit (GEO), is gaining momentum.

    Company Astranis building Perceptor spacecraft designed to capture satellite activity in GEO orbits.

    FYI, GEO is typically 35,786kms/22,236 miles above Earth ... popular for communications, weather and "reconnaissance" satellites. space.com/space-exploration/sa #Space #Satellite #GEO #GeostationaryOrbit #Perceptor #Astranis #Spacecraft #Reconnaissance #Sensors #OpticalSensors #USSF #EarthObservation #USGov

  13. Spying on "reconnaissance spacecraft" in geostationary orbit (GEO), is gaining momentum.

    Company Astranis building Perceptor spacecraft designed to capture satellite activity in GEO orbits.

    FYI, GEO is typically 35,786kms/22,236 miles above Earth ... popular for communications, weather and "reconnaissance" satellites. space.com/space-exploration/sa

  14. "17 amazing photos taken from the International Space Station – lightning looks crazy from orbit!" by @Spacecom - Day, night and solar eclipse images by astronauts on #ISS show what an awesome view there is up there. skyatnightmagazine.com/space-m #NASA #space #photography #EarthObservation #OverviewEffect #spacegeek

  15. "17 amazing photos taken from the International Space Station – lightning looks crazy from orbit!" by @Spacecom - Day, night and solar eclipse images by astronauts on #ISS show what an awesome view there is up there. skyatnightmagazine.com/space-m #NASA #space #photography #EarthObservation #OverviewEffect #spacegeek

  16. "17 amazing photos taken from the International Space Station – lightning looks crazy from orbit!" by @Spacecom - Day, night and solar eclipse images by astronauts on #ISS show what an awesome view there is up there. skyatnightmagazine.com/space-m #NASA #space #photography #EarthObservation #OverviewEffect #spacegeek

  17. "17 amazing photos taken from the International Space Station – lightning looks crazy from orbit!" by @Spacecom - Day, night and solar eclipse images by astronauts on #ISS show what an awesome view there is up there. skyatnightmagazine.com/space-m #NASA #space #photography #EarthObservation #OverviewEffect #spacegeek

  18. "17 amazing photos taken from the International Space Station – lightning looks crazy from orbit!" by @Spacecom - Day, night and solar eclipse images by astronauts on #ISS show what an awesome view there is up there. skyatnightmagazine.com/space-m #NASA #space #photography #EarthObservation #OverviewEffect #spacegeek

  19. 🔥 Mapping Calgary's Fuel Continuity: Where Can Wildfire Actually Spread?

    In a baseline, unsuppressed fire scenario ("apocalyptic scenario"), surface fires can only sustain a continuous front where vegetation forms an unbroken canopy or grassland corridor.

    Using my 2025 Calgary Land Cover Model (v6.0), I isolated all vegetated pixels and calculated the spatial continuity and total area of every single contiguous fuel patch across the city:
    🌾 The Nose Hill Island (~1,100 ha): A massive grassland fuel bed right in the city's heart.
    🌲 River Corridors (Fish Creek Provincial Park & Bow Valley, 500–1,500 ha): Linear fuel superclusters acting as natural conduits.
    🏙️ Urban Built-up Fragmentation: Inside established communities, the continuous network of asphalt, concrete, and roofing fractures vegetation into micro-patches (< 1 ha).

    #GIS #RemoteSensing #EarthObservation #Calgary #SpatialDataScience #LandCover #MachineLearning #GreennessOfCalgary #Rstats #UrbanTrees #TreeCanopy #UrbanHealth #Wildfire

  20. 🔥 Calgary Urban Heat: How the Solid-to-Tree Ratio drives an 8°C gap

    My Summer 2025 ML satellite analysis reveals a direct relationship between a community's built-to-canopy footprint and surface temperature (LST):

    🌳 Cooling Refuges (~29.5–31°C): Roxboro, Rideau Park, Discovery Ridge, Eau Claire (mature canopies + river valleys).
    🔥 Northeast Heat Dome (~37–38°C): Marlborough, Rundle, Temple (dense low-rise footprint, minimal mature canopy).
    🏗️ New Suburbs: Seton, Redstone, Rangeview (canopy lag: fully built out, but young saplings need years to mature).

    🌲 Urban trees are not decorative landscaping — they are critical municipal climate infrastructure.

    #GIS #RemoteSensing #YYC #EarthObservation #Calgary #SpatialDataScience #LandCover #MachineLearning #Geoscience #GreennessOfCalgary #Rstats #UrbanTrees #TreeCanopy #UrbanHealth

  21. 🔥 The Green Illusion: Why Zoning-Level Analysis Changes the Picture

    📊 Gross community statistics can be misleading. When measuring an entire neighborhood, large municipal parks and green buffers inflate the overall 'greenness' score.

    ❗ When we filter the data down exclusively to actual Residential Land Use Districts in established communities, the picture changes significant:
    🔹 Unvegetated/Impervious surfaces (Solid) explode to ~80% (79.22%) of the total zoned area.
    🔹 Vegetative classes collapse: Functional lawns and canopy cover are compressed into narrow margins (Lawn: 2.15%, Forest: 0.59%), with community-level sparsed trees (Park) accounting for only 17.87%.

    ☝️ Moving from macro-boundaries to parcel-level zoning exposes the true physical density of Calgary’s residential footprint.

    #GIS #RemoteSensing #EarthObservation #Calgary #SpatialDataScience #LandCover #MachineLearning #Geoscience #GreennessOfCalgary #Rstats #YYC #DataScience #Urban #Sentinel

  22. Impact Of Urbanization Driven Land Use And Land Cover Change On Ecological Environmental Quality In Rupandehi Nepal Assessed Using The Remote Sensing Ecological Index
    --
    doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-006 <-- shared paper
    --
    kathmandupost.com/money/2026/0 <-- shared media article
    --
    H/T@ Gaurav Parajulim
    “[The authors] studied how the ecological quality of Nepal's Rupandehi District has changed over three decades (1993–2023), using satellite imagery and the Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) to track the health of the landscape year by year and to understand how urbanization-driven land use change has reshaped it.
    What [they] found tells a nuanced story: as Butwal and Bhairahawa grew and built-up land expanded, ecological quality shifted in ways that a single number can't capture, some areas recovered, others declined, and the patterns rarely moved in a straight line…”
    --
    “Rapid urbanization and population growth are major drivers of land use and land cover (LULC) change and can substantially alter ecological environmental quality (EEQ). This study assessed the spatiotemporal dynamics of LULC and their effect on EEQ in Rupandehi District, Nepal, over a 30-year period (1993–2023). Four ecological indicators representing greenness, wetness, dryness, and heat were derived from Landsat imagery in Google Earth Engine (GEE), and LULC was classified using a Support Vector Machine (SVM). The Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) was then constructed from these indicators using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in ArcGIS Pro, and its spatial structure was examined using global and local spatial autocorrelation. The mean RSEI followed a non-linear trajectory, rising from 0.59 in 1993 to 0.635 in 2004, declining to 0.55 in 2013, and recovering to 0.67 in 2023, indicating an overall improvement in EEQ with a temporary mid-period decline. Over the same period, built-up areas expanded substantially and agricultural land declined, whereas forest cover fluctuated but showed a slight net increase by 2023, and barren land decreased markedly. Higher EEQ was concentrated in the forested northern hills, while lower values occurred in the urban centers of Butwal and Bhairahawa, closely matching the spatial pattern of LULC change. The results indicate that ecological quality reflects the combined influence of all land cover classes rather than any single class. This study provides a transferable and reproducible workflow for long-term ecological assessment based on openly available Landsat data, with the analysis code shared in a public repository, offering practical guidance for sustainable land management and environmentally responsible urban development...”
    #GIS #spatial #mapping #RemoteSensing #GIS #RSEI #EnvironmentalMonitoring #Nepal #Research #GoogleEarthEngine #ArcGIS #EcologicalQuality #spatialautocorrelation #ecology #environment #earthobservation #RemoteSensingEcologicalIndex #landscape #urbanisation #urban #development #landuse #change #spatialanalysis #spatiotemporal

  23. How does physical vegetation compare to administrative park maps?

    In a new article by LiveWire Calgary, I shared technical insights from my 10-meter machine learning land cover classification model.

    🛰️ Satellites map physical ground reality, not property boundaries. Multispectral land cover data reveals continuous fine fuel pathways (grass, brush, and canopy) extending across unmanaged ravines and private lots right up to residential property lines at Calgary's Wildland-Urban Interface.

    🔗 Read the full article: livewirecalgary.com/2026/08/06

    #GIS #RemoteSensing #EarthObservation #Calgary #SpatialDataScience #LandCover #WUI #MachineLearning #Geoscience #GreennessOfCalgary #LiveWireCalgary

  24. Mapping Multifunctionality In Remote Patagonian Forest Landscapes Reveals High-Value Ecosystems Beyond Protected Areas
    --
    doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-035 <-- shared paper
    --
    H/T @Peter Potapov | Researcher at the World Resources Institute (WRI)
    “This paper is] a strong example of multifunctionality analysis applied to conservation planning. The study mapped six ecosystem functions, including carbon storage, nutrient availability, water regulation, erosion control, habitat quality, and ecological connectivity. [The author] combined satellite data, field soil sampling, and spatial modeling for this comprehensive analysis.
    Two findings stand out.
    1. Old-growth forests had the highest multifunctionality index of any land cover type.
    2. 78.5% of the top multifunctionality hotspots fall outside the region's protected areas, even though PAs already cover more than 54% of the territory.
    Together, these results make a clear case for expanding conservation of the remaining Intact Forest Landscapes and primary forests in Patagonia and elsewhere…”
    --
    “Remote forest landscapes provide critical references for understanding ecosystem functions (EFs) under low anthropogenic pressure, yet their capacity to sustain multiple EFs simultaneously remains poorly understood. [They] assessed landscape multifunctionality in western Patagonia by integrating satellite indicators, field data, and spatial modeling. Six EFs (carbon storage, nutrient availability, water regulation, erosion control, habitat quality, and ecological connectivity) were mapped, and their spatial relationships and hotspot distribution within and outside protected areas (PAs) were analyzed. Old-growth and secondary forests showed the highest functional performance. Strong synergies (ρ ≥ 0.6) between carbon storage and nutrient availability covered >50% of the landscape, whereas strong trade-offs (ρ ≤ –0.6) were spatially limited ( < 6%). Notably, 78% of multifunctionality hotspots occurred outside PAs, indicating that high-functional-value areas extend beyond formal conservation boundaries. These findings reveal spatial mismatches between multifunctionality and protection status and provide a replicable framework for integrating multifunctionality into conservation planning under global change…”
    #Patagonia #chile #aysen #coyhaique #landcover #mapping #spatial #spatialpatterns #spatiotemporal #spatialanalysis #forest #vegetation #oldgrowth #secondgrowth #shrubland #grassland #steppe #ecosystem #habitat #nutrients #water #hydrology #erosion #multifunctionality #multifunctionalityanalysis #protectedareas #landuse #conservationplanning #conservation #ecology #carbonstorage #nutrientavailability #waterregulation #erosioncontrol #habitatquality #ecologicalconnectivity #remotesensing #satellite #earthobservation #modeling

  25. On July 1, 2026, The Company Once Known As Maxar Began Selling 3D Maps Of Earth It Can Refresh Within A Day Or Sharpen To 15 Centimeters, Built Less For People To Study Than For The Autonomous Drones And Weapons That Navigate By Matching Their Cameras Against The Terrain
    (Vantor, the American Earth-observation company… is now rebuilding chosen stretches of the planet as three-dimensional models and delivering them within a day of imaging — a commercial first…)
    --
    spacedaily.com/sd-on-july-1-20 <-- shared technical media article
    --
    [this post should – most specifically – NOT be considered an endorsement of a particular organisation or product]
    • “Built for GPS-denied warfare…
    • The 3D twist changes the risk calculus…”
    “Vantor, the American Earth-observation company…., is now rebuilding chosen stretches of the planet as three-dimensional models and delivering them within a day of imaging — a commercial first, the company says, and one aimed as much at autonomous machines as at the analysts and militaries who have always been its customers.
    The service, called WorldView 3D, went live on July 1. It draws on a fleet of 10 satellites imaging Earth’s surface at 12-inch (30-centimeter) resolution, according to Space.com. The 3D views are constructed by combining multiple images taken from different orbital angles, then refreshed on a daily cadence — a speed the company says is impossible to match with aircraft or drones over remote or contested territory.
    According to the company’s launch announcement… the service would enable rapid updates of remote and contested areas, calling it the future of spatial intelligence….
    The product comes in two tiers…:
    • Standard resolution delivers 20-inch (50 cm) imagery with 13-foot (4-meter) accuracy in all directions.
    • The HD tier tightens that to 6-inch (15 cm) resolution with 10-foot (3-meter) positional accuracy in three dimensions.
    Those numbers matter for a specific reason. Traditional 3D mapping — the kind used by autonomous vehicle companies and defense contractors — has historically relied on aircraft flights, drone surveys, or LiDAR passes. Those methods produce excellent detail. They also require physical access to the airspace above the target.
    Vantor’s pitch is that satellites remove the access problem. A constellation in low Earth orbit passes over hostile territory as freely as it passes over Kansas…”
    #GIS #spatial #mapping #military #geoint #geointelligence #remotesensing #LiDAR #elevation #drones #weapons #warfare #conflict #spatialanalysis #spatiotemporal #imagery #3DModel #earthobservation #satellite #AI #machinelearning #GPS #hostileterritory #risk #hazard #WorldView3D #highresolution #changedetection #spatialintelligence

  26. Optical, Radar, And Hybrid Indices To Detect Farming Practices In Europe
    --
    doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2026.115 <-- shared paper
    --
    “HIGHLIGHTS:
    • [they] compare[d] Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time series to detect farming practices.
    • HyBRIS index is introduced, temporally weighting BSI and VH/VV into a daily index.
    • Time-series minima and maxima are used to predict sowing, harvest, and tillage.
    • Validation is performed across several years, crop types, and European locations.
    • Phenology detection is improved compared to HRL-Cropland.
    ABSTRACT: Arable farming practices dictate both crop cycles and soil dynamics, and are central to agriculture's environmental impact and its mitigation. Sowing and harvesting mark the beginning and end of the growing season, while tillage modifies soil structure during the dormant period. Although well-established methods exist for delineating the growing season using phenology and optical data, the detection of farming practices, particularly tillage, remains underexplored. This study investigates the strengths of radar and optical data to retrieve sowing, harvest, and tillage dates at the field level, and proposes a novel Hybrid Bare Soil Radar Index (HyBRIS). Based on Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2, HyBRIS merges optical and radar data into a single index using a temporally weighted mean. Local minima and maxima of the time series are used to detect farming practices across European sites. Validation is carried out against a reference dataset comprising 238 fields in 11 EU countries, including 462 sowing, 374 harvest, and 388 tillage events covering more than 40 crop types over 8 years. Compared to the Copernicus High Resolution Layer Croplands product (HRL-Cropland), the proposed method based on HyBRIS time series improved sowing and harvest dates detection (MAE 26 and 23 days, respectively). Additionally, this method enabled tillage dates estimation during dormant periods (MAE = 28 days), but tended to overestimate the number of tillage events (producer's accuracy = 97%, user's accuracy = 70%). Incorporating soil moisture data is advised for reducing false positives. The results highlight the potential of optical, radar, and hybrid indices for monitoring agricultural management and supporting environmental stewardship…”
    #Sowing #Harvest #tillage #tillagedetection #cropland #CroplandManagement #remotesensing #earthobservation #sentinel #Copernicus #cropland #satellite #optical #radar #sensor #landuse #landcover #landsurface #phenology #agricultural #monitoring #GIS #spatial #mapping #spatialanalysis #spatiotemporal #arable #farming #agriculture #soil #substrate #environment #sustainability #environmentalstewardship #growingseason #Europe #region #model #modeling

  27. Geospatial Data As Bioethical Evidence
    --
    doi.org/10.4401/jgsg-111 <-- shared paper
    --
    theconversation.com/gaza-we-an <-- shared technical article
    --
    scientificamerican.com/article <-- shared 2023 technical article
    --
    “Satellite imagery now documents systematic patterns of infrastructure destruction at spatial resolutions and temporal cadences that were unavailable during the atrocities of the twentieth century. Whether and how such data may enter bioethical deliberation, however, remains under-theorized. Quantitative remote sensing produces damage percentages, not normative claims, and bridging the two without committing an is-ought fallacy requires an explicit epistemological procedure. The contribution developed here is normative and epistemological rather than empirical. A six-component admissibility framework integrates, for the first time, geospatial evidence, population-level bioethical principlism, and the coherentist verification epistemology of political fact-checking into a single reproducible procedure for the bioethical use of satellite imagery. The first component specifies evidence admissibility criteria tailored to bioethical rather than strictly legal use. The second requires coherentist triangulation across methodologically independent remote sensing studies. The third operates as a bioethical relevance filter mapping infrastructure categories onto population-level social determinants of health. The fourth operationalizes principlism by translating health justice, accountability, solidarity, and sustainability into measurable geospatial observables. The fifth establishes ethical representation safeguards against voyeuristic or dehumanizing uses of destruction imagery. The sixth demands explicit epistemic humility regarding uncertainty, data missingness, and attribution limits. The Gaza conflict provides the case in point. Two independently produced geospatial studies, one based on SAR coherent change detection and one on very-high-resolution optical analysis, converge on extensive damage to civilian healthcare, water, sanitation, and educational infrastructure, and thereby satisfy the coherentist triangulation requirement of the framework. The resulting inference licenses bioethical claims of systematic survival infrastructure degradation while preserving transparent boundaries between what satellite evidence can and cannot establish about genocidal intent…”
    #geoethics #GIS #spatial #mapping #remotesensing #earthobservation #imagery #satellite #opendata #conflict #war #military #destruction #infrastructure #spatiotemporal #bioethical #evidence #damagepercentages #spatialanalysis #change #quantitative #metrics #normative #epistemological #admissibility #framework #factchecking #controlled #publicsafety #publichealth #healthjustice #geospatialobservables #observation #uncertainty #controls #boundaries #changedetection #coherentisttriangulation #example #gaza

  28. Scientists See More Vegetation In The Himalayas - But It Is Not Good News, Because That Extra “Green” Can Disrupt Water, Snow, And High-Mountain Biodiversity | Plants Growing Higher Across Himalaya As Climate Warms
    (Vegetation On The Move: Elevational Shifts And Greening Dynamics Across The Himalayan Alpine Zone)
    --
    ecoticias.com/en/scientists-se <-- shared technical article
    --
    news.exeter.ac.uk/faculty-of-e <-- shared technical newsitem
    --
    doi.org/10.1002/ecog.08259 <-- shared (2026) paper
    --
    doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14919 <-- shared (2020) paper
    --
    “For years, the biggest climate warning from the Himalaya was easy to picture because glaciers were shrinking on the roof of Asia. Now, researchers are pointing to a quieter signal, one that can look almost harmless from a distance. The mountains are getting greener.
    New research [link above] shows alpine vegetation moving higher across six Himalayan regions from 1999 to 2022, pushed in part by warming and reduced snow depth. That might sound like nature recovering, but in this fragile landscape, more plant cover at extreme heights may change how snow is stored, how water runs downhill, and how rivers behave for communities far below…”
    #GIS #spatial #mapping #remotesensing #earthobservation #satellite #landsat #landcover #NDVI #Himalaya #Nepal #India #Bhutan #climatechange #glacier #vegetation #alpine #level #greening #spatialanalysis #spatiotemporal #snow #water #ice #hydrography #hydrology #ecosystems #humaninpacts #phenology #model #modeling #HighMountainAsia #greenness #ERA5 #vegetationline #altitude #climatictrends #warming #precipitation #rainfall