home.social

#webofscience — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #webofscience, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Do I want to get recognition for this review on Web of Science?

    (Please also tell me why or why not! I don't think I have a Web of Science profile, should I get one just for this?)

    #academia #AcademicChatter #WebOfScience

  2. Do I want to get recognition for this review on Web of Science?

    (Please also tell me why or why not! I don't think I have a Web of Science profile, should I get one just for this?)

    #academia #AcademicChatter #WebOfScience

  3. Do I want to get recognition for this review on Web of Science?

    (Please also tell me why or why not! I don't think I have a Web of Science profile, should I get one just for this?)

    #academia #AcademicChatter #WebOfScience

  4. Do I want to get recognition for this review on Web of Science?

    (Please also tell me why or why not! I don't think I have a Web of Science profile, should I get one just for this?)

    #academia #AcademicChatter #WebOfScience

  5. 📊 How do researchers actually use bibliographic databases today?

    The Bibliometrics Service of the Université de Lorraine has published the results of its 2026 survey on Web of Science usage, conducted across the university community.

    Based on 545 responses spanning a broad disciplinary spectrum, the survey explores current practices around Web of Science, Google Scholar, disciplinary databases, and the emerging open alternative #OpenAlex.

    Key findings include:
    🔹 Google Scholar is now the most consulted resource, ahead of Web of Science.
    🔹 Web of Science remains mainly used for literature search, monitoring, bibliometric studies, and Journal Citation Reports.
    🔹 OpenAlex, although still relatively new, is gaining attention for its broad coverage, accessibility, and open infrastructure.
    🔹 The study suggests that many WoS uses could potentially transition toward OpenAlex, provided there is continued work on data quality and user support.

    This work aligns with the Université de Lorraine’s commitment to open research information, in the broader context of the Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information @BarcelonaDORI and ongoing changes in institutional subscriptions to proprietary databases.

    A key takeaway:
    ➡️ Open tools alone are not enough; their successful adoption also depends on training, mediation, and support from academic libraries.

    📖 Read the full analysis:
    🇫🇷 French version: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20310514
    📂 Raw data available on Recherche Data Gouv:
    doi.org/10.57745/THDNY1
    🇬🇧 English version: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20312097

    #OpenScience #Bibliometrics #ResearchInformation #OpenAlex #WebOfScience #OpenResearch

  6. 📊 How do researchers actually use bibliographic databases today?

    The Bibliometrics Service of the Université de Lorraine has published the results of its 2026 survey on Web of Science usage, conducted across the university community.

    Based on 545 responses spanning a broad disciplinary spectrum, the survey explores current practices around Web of Science, Google Scholar, disciplinary databases, and the emerging open alternative #OpenAlex.

    Key findings include:
    🔹 Google Scholar is now the most consulted resource, ahead of Web of Science.
    🔹 Web of Science remains mainly used for literature search, monitoring, bibliometric studies, and Journal Citation Reports.
    🔹 OpenAlex, although still relatively new, is gaining attention for its broad coverage, accessibility, and open infrastructure.
    🔹 The study suggests that many WoS uses could potentially transition toward OpenAlex, provided there is continued work on data quality and user support.

    This work aligns with the Université de Lorraine’s commitment to open research information, in the broader context of the Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information @BarcelonaDORI and ongoing changes in institutional subscriptions to proprietary databases.

    A key takeaway:
    ➡️ Open tools alone are not enough; their successful adoption also depends on training, mediation, and support from academic libraries.

    📖 Read the full analysis:
    🇫🇷 French version: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20310514
    📂 Raw data available on Recherche Data Gouv:
    doi.org/10.57745/THDNY1
    🇬🇧 English version: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20312097

    #OpenScience #Bibliometrics #ResearchInformation #OpenAlex #WebOfScience #OpenResearch

  7. 📊 How do researchers actually use bibliographic databases today?

    The Bibliometrics Service of the Université de Lorraine has published the results of its 2026 survey on Web of Science usage, conducted across the university community.

    Based on 545 responses spanning a broad disciplinary spectrum, the survey explores current practices around Web of Science, Google Scholar, disciplinary databases, and the emerging open alternative #OpenAlex.

    Key findings include:
    🔹 Google Scholar is now the most consulted resource, ahead of Web of Science.
    🔹 Web of Science remains mainly used for literature search, monitoring, bibliometric studies, and Journal Citation Reports.
    🔹 OpenAlex, although still relatively new, is gaining attention for its broad coverage, accessibility, and open infrastructure.
    🔹 The study suggests that many WoS uses could potentially transition toward OpenAlex, provided there is continued work on data quality and user support.

    This work aligns with the Université de Lorraine’s commitment to open research information, in the broader context of the Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information @BarcelonaDORI and ongoing changes in institutional subscriptions to proprietary databases.

    A key takeaway:
    ➡️ Open tools alone are not enough; their successful adoption also depends on training, mediation, and support from academic libraries.

    📖 Read the full analysis:
    🇫🇷 French version: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20310514
    📂 Raw data available on Recherche Data Gouv:
    doi.org/10.57745/THDNY1
    🇬🇧 English version: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20312097

    #OpenScience #Bibliometrics #ResearchInformation #OpenAlex #WebOfScience #OpenResearch

  8. 📊 How do researchers actually use bibliographic databases today?

    The Bibliometrics Service of the Université de Lorraine has published the results of its 2026 survey on Web of Science usage, conducted across the university community.

    Based on 545 responses spanning a broad disciplinary spectrum, the survey explores current practices around Web of Science, Google Scholar, disciplinary databases, and the emerging open alternative #OpenAlex.

    Key findings include:
    🔹 Google Scholar is now the most consulted resource, ahead of Web of Science.
    🔹 Web of Science remains mainly used for literature search, monitoring, bibliometric studies, and Journal Citation Reports.
    🔹 OpenAlex, although still relatively new, is gaining attention for its broad coverage, accessibility, and open infrastructure.
    🔹 The study suggests that many WoS uses could potentially transition toward OpenAlex, provided there is continued work on data quality and user support.

    This work aligns with the Université de Lorraine’s commitment to open research information, in the broader context of the Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information @BarcelonaDORI and ongoing changes in institutional subscriptions to proprietary databases.

    A key takeaway:
    ➡️ Open tools alone are not enough; their successful adoption also depends on training, mediation, and support from academic libraries.

    📖 Read the full analysis:
    🇫🇷 French version: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20310514
    📂 Raw data available on Recherche Data Gouv:
    doi.org/10.57745/THDNY1
    🇬🇧 English version: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20312097

    #OpenScience #Bibliometrics #ResearchInformation #OpenAlex #WebOfScience #OpenResearch

  9. A large part of the economy deals in knowledge – and I’m not talking about education alone. Knowledge is a major ingredient, as well as a byproduct of, any credible attempt at societal change. A host of institutions – universities, governments, parliaments, think tanks and what have you – continuously produce knowledge.

    Read the ad-free, no-tracking, complete blog post here: cottica.net/2026/04/08/frictio

    THREAD 1/20

    #digitallife #AltMetric #digital #DOI #ORCID #SCOPUS #WebofScience #Zenodo

  10. A large part of the economy deals in knowledge – and I’m not talking about education alone. Knowledge is a major ingredient, as well as a byproduct of, any credible attempt at societal change. A host of institutions – universities, governments, parliaments, think tanks and what have you – continuously produce knowledge.

    Read the ad-free, no-tracking, complete blog post here: cottica.net/2026/04/08/frictio

    THREAD 1/20

    #digitallife #AltMetric #digital #DOI #ORCID #SCOPUS #WebofScience #Zenodo

  11. A large part of the economy deals in knowledge – and I’m not talking about education alone. Knowledge is a major ingredient, as well as a byproduct of, any credible attempt at societal change. A host of institutions – universities, governments, parliaments, think tanks and what have you – continuously produce knowledge.

    Read the ad-free, no-tracking, complete blog post here: cottica.net/2026/04/08/frictio

    THREAD 1/20

    #digitallife #AltMetric #digital #DOI #ORCID #SCOPUS #WebofScience #Zenodo

  12. A large part of the economy deals in knowledge – and I’m not talking about education alone. Knowledge is a major ingredient, as well as a byproduct of, any credible attempt at societal change. A host of institutions – universities, governments, parliaments, think tanks and what have you – continuously produce knowledge.

    Read the ad-free, no-tracking, complete blog post here: cottica.net/2026/04/08/frictio

    THREAD 1/20

    #digitallife #AltMetric #digital #DOI #ORCID #SCOPUS #WebofScience #Zenodo

  13. RE: social.sciences.re/@TheMetaNew

    #PublierLaScience Très bon article pour faire le point sur l'indexation des revues dans le #WebOfScience et sur l' #impactfactor. Avec qq exemples de revues très prolixes (25 000 articles en 1 an!).. ou qui se citent elles-mêmes à 93%...

  14. Update. "The University of Groningen (UG) and the University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG) will cancel their licence for the #WebOfScience database with effect from 1 January 2027."

    #Clarivate #Netherlands #WOS

  15. Update. "The University of Groningen (UG) and the University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG) will cancel their licence for the #WebOfScience database with effect from 1 January 2027."

    #Clarivate #Netherlands #WOS

  16. Update. "The University of Groningen (UG) and the University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG) will cancel their licence for the #WebOfScience database with effect from 1 January 2027."

    #Clarivate #Netherlands #WOS

  17. Update. "The University of Groningen (UG) and the University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG) will cancel their licence for the #WebOfScience database with effect from 1 January 2027."

    #Clarivate #Netherlands #WOS

  18. 📢 Please note: access to Web of Science for staff and students of the UMCG & University Groningen will end on 1 Jan 2027!

    Reason: costs, overlap with other databases, and our commitment to open & transparent research.

    🔗 rug.nl/library/news/20260420-e
    #WebOfScience #OpenResearch #UMCG #UG #AcademicLibraries

  19. And now #Clarivate #WebOfScience says:

    "Roaming Access Expiration Notice
    Your roaming access to the Web of Science has expired. You are in a free session of the Web of Science and the functionality may be limited. To gain full access to the Web of Science you will need to renew your roaming access by signing in to Web of Science at your institution."

    They really like to snoop don't they?

  20. And now #Clarivate #WebOfScience says:

    "Roaming Access Expiration Notice
    Your roaming access to the Web of Science has expired. You are in a free session of the Web of Science and the functionality may be limited. To gain full access to the Web of Science you will need to renew your roaming access by signing in to Web of Science at your institution."

    They really like to snoop don't they?

  21. And now #Clarivate #WebOfScience says:

    "Roaming Access Expiration Notice
    Your roaming access to the Web of Science has expired. You are in a free session of the Web of Science and the functionality may be limited. To gain full access to the Web of Science you will need to renew your roaming access by signing in to Web of Science at your institution."

    They really like to snoop don't they?

  22. And now #Clarivate #WebOfScience says:

    "Roaming Access Expiration Notice
    Your roaming access to the Web of Science has expired. You are in a free session of the Web of Science and the functionality may be limited. To gain full access to the Web of Science you will need to renew your roaming access by signing in to Web of Science at your institution."

    They really like to snoop don't they?

  23. #Clarivate wants me to review 7 publications added to my #WebOfScience profile, so tried to log in. Figured I'd login via my #OrcidID, but Clarivate want permissions to:

    * Add/update your research activities (works, affiliations, etc.)
    * Add/update information about you (country, keywords, etc.)
    * Read your information with visibility set to Trusted parties

    None of those are acceptable to me, denied. Signed in with Google - all they get that way is read access to my name, profile picture and email address.

  24. #Clarivate wants me to review 7 publications added to my #WebOfScience profile, so tried to log in. Figured I'd login via my #OrcidID, but Clarivate want permissions to:

    * Add/update your research activities (works, affiliations, etc.)
    * Add/update information about you (country, keywords, etc.)
    * Read your information with visibility set to Trusted parties

    None of those are acceptable to me, denied. Signed in with Google - all they get that way is read access to my name, profile picture and email address.

  25. #Clarivate wants me to review 7 publications added to my #WebOfScience profile, so tried to log in. Figured I'd login via my #OrcidID, but Clarivate want permissions to:

    * Add/update your research activities (works, affiliations, etc.)
    * Add/update information about you (country, keywords, etc.)
    * Read your information with visibility set to Trusted parties

    None of those are acceptable to me, denied. Signed in with Google - all they get that way is read access to my name, profile picture and email address.

  26. #Clarivate wants me to review 7 publications added to my #WebOfScience profile, so tried to log in. Figured I'd login via my #OrcidID, but Clarivate want permissions to:

    * Add/update your research activities (works, affiliations, etc.)
    * Add/update information about you (country, keywords, etc.)
    * Read your information with visibility set to Trusted parties

    None of those are acceptable to me, denied. Signed in with Google - all they get that way is read access to my name, profile picture and email address.

  27. Chinese Academy of Sciences to Stop Paying Publication Fees for Over 30 Int’l Open Access Journals, Researchers Say

    (Yicai) Feb. 27 — The Chinese Academy of Sciences plans to stop paying article processing charges for more…
    #UnitedStates #US #USA #america #APC #CellReports #NatureCommunications #openaccess #predatoryjournals #publishing #science #ScienceAdvances #technology #unitedstatesofamerica #WebofScience
    europesays.com/2809282/

  28. 📢 Participez à l’enquête sur les usages du Web of Science à l’Université de Lorraine !

    Dans le cadre d’une étude sur les alternatives ouvertes et gratuites comme OpenAlex, le service Bibliométrie de l’Université de Lorraine souhaite recueillir les retours de tout le personnel sur l’utilisation actuelle du Web of Science.

    Cette initiative s’inscrit dans la continuité des engagements de l’Université de Lorraine en faveur de l’ouverture des informations de recherche, notamment via la Déclaration de Barcelone signée en novembre 2024. Elle fait écho aux récentes décisions de Sorbonne Université et du CNRS de se désabonner du Web of Science (dès janvier 2026 pour ce dernier).

    Vos réponses permettront de proposer un accompagnement sur mesure.

    🕒 Temps estimé : 3 minutes
    ⏳ Date limite : 13 février 2026
    🔗 Je participe à l’enquête : enquetes.univ-lorraine.fr/inde
    💡 Pour aller plus loin : Découvrez OpenAlex lors d’un atelier en ligne d’1h !
    📅 Inscription : rdv.univ-lorraine.fr/ateliersb

    #Bibliométrie #OpenAlex #WebOfScience

  29. 📢 Participez à l’enquête sur les usages du Web of Science à l’Université de Lorraine !

    Dans le cadre d’une étude sur les alternatives ouvertes et gratuites comme OpenAlex, le service Bibliométrie de l’Université de Lorraine souhaite recueillir les retours de tout le personnel sur l’utilisation actuelle du Web of Science.

    Cette initiative s’inscrit dans la continuité des engagements de l’Université de Lorraine en faveur de l’ouverture des informations de recherche, notamment via la Déclaration de Barcelone signée en novembre 2024. Elle fait écho aux récentes décisions de Sorbonne Université et du CNRS de se désabonner du Web of Science (dès janvier 2026 pour ce dernier).

    Vos réponses permettront de proposer un accompagnement sur mesure.

    🕒 Temps estimé : 3 minutes
    ⏳ Date limite : 13 février 2026
    🔗 Je participe à l’enquête : enquetes.univ-lorraine.fr/inde
    💡 Pour aller plus loin : Découvrez OpenAlex lors d’un atelier en ligne d’1h !
    📅 Inscription : rdv.univ-lorraine.fr/ateliersb

    #Bibliométrie #OpenAlex #WebOfScience

  30. 📢 Participez à l’enquête sur les usages du Web of Science à l’Université de Lorraine !

    Dans le cadre d’une étude sur les alternatives ouvertes et gratuites comme OpenAlex, le service Bibliométrie de l’Université de Lorraine souhaite recueillir les retours de tout le personnel sur l’utilisation actuelle du Web of Science.

    Cette initiative s’inscrit dans la continuité des engagements de l’Université de Lorraine en faveur de l’ouverture des informations de recherche, notamment via la Déclaration de Barcelone signée en novembre 2024. Elle fait écho aux récentes décisions de Sorbonne Université et du CNRS de se désabonner du Web of Science (dès janvier 2026 pour ce dernier).

    Vos réponses permettront de proposer un accompagnement sur mesure.

    🕒 Temps estimé : 3 minutes
    ⏳ Date limite : 13 février 2026
    🔗 Je participe à l’enquête : enquetes.univ-lorraine.fr/inde
    💡 Pour aller plus loin : Découvrez OpenAlex lors d’un atelier en ligne d’1h !
    📅 Inscription : rdv.univ-lorraine.fr/ateliersb

    #Bibliométrie #OpenAlex #WebOfScience

  31. 📢 Participez à l’enquête sur les usages du Web of Science à l’Université de Lorraine !

    Dans le cadre d’une étude sur les alternatives ouvertes et gratuites comme OpenAlex, le service Bibliométrie de l’Université de Lorraine souhaite recueillir les retours de tout le personnel sur l’utilisation actuelle du Web of Science.

    Cette initiative s’inscrit dans la continuité des engagements de l’Université de Lorraine en faveur de l’ouverture des informations de recherche, notamment via la Déclaration de Barcelone signée en novembre 2024. Elle fait écho aux récentes décisions de Sorbonne Université et du CNRS de se désabonner du Web of Science (dès janvier 2026 pour ce dernier).

    Vos réponses permettront de proposer un accompagnement sur mesure.

    🕒 Temps estimé : 3 minutes
    ⏳ Date limite : 13 février 2026
    🔗 Je participe à l’enquête : enquetes.univ-lorraine.fr/inde
    💡 Pour aller plus loin : Découvrez OpenAlex lors d’un atelier en ligne d’1h !
    📅 Inscription : rdv.univ-lorraine.fr/ateliersb

    #Bibliométrie #OpenAlex #WebOfScience

  32. @vardi indexing and metadata is still in the hands of the big publishers (#scopus and #webofscience, for instance). We need to double down on open alternatives (such as #dblp). It would have been a positive surprise if #ACM would have led the way here, but obviously they decided to go in a different direction.

  33. @vardi indexing and metadata is still in the hands of the big publishers (#scopus and #webofscience, for instance). We need to double down on open alternatives (such as #dblp). It would have been a positive surprise if #ACM would have led the way here, but obviously they decided to go in a different direction.

  34. @vardi indexing and metadata is still in the hands of the big publishers (#scopus and #webofscience, for instance). We need to double down on open alternatives (such as #dblp). It would have been a positive surprise if #ACM would have led the way here, but obviously they decided to go in a different direction.

  35. @vardi indexing and metadata is still in the hands of the big publishers (#scopus and #webofscience, for instance). We need to double down on open alternatives (such as #dblp). It would have been a positive surprise if #ACM would have led the way here, but obviously they decided to go in a different direction.

  36. According to #WebOfScience I have been cited one time in a patent, but there doesn't seem to be an obvious way to find *which* patent cites me. I'm honestly curious where that might be coming from, since AFAIK I have never done anything patent-worthy … does anybody know how I can find out if it's true and how to find the citing patent?

  37. According to #WebOfScience I have been cited one time in a patent, but there doesn't seem to be an obvious way to find *which* patent cites me. I'm honestly curious where that might be coming from, since AFAIK I have never done anything patent-worthy … does anybody know how I can find out if it's true and how to find the citing patent?

  38. According to #WebOfScience I have been cited one time in a patent, but there doesn't seem to be an obvious way to find *which* patent cites me. I'm honestly curious where that might be coming from, since AFAIK I have never done anything patent-worthy … does anybody know how I can find out if it's true and how to find the citing patent?

  39. According to #WebOfScience I have been cited one time in a patent, but there doesn't seem to be an obvious way to find *which* patent cites me. I'm honestly curious where that might be coming from, since AFAIK I have never done anything patent-worthy … does anybody know how I can find out if it's true and how to find the citing patent?

  40. A 2020 paper on using jade amulets to cure COVID has had quite some fallout.

    Three years on, the first author sued his institution, Pittsburgh, because he said their response was discriminatory: retractionwatch.com/2023/08/11. He left the same year and has since founded his own institute for "paradigm shifts".

    Five years on, this case and other problems led Clarivate to delist the journal, Elsevier's Science of the Total Environment, from the Web of Science. english.elpais.com/science-tec

    #ResearchIntegrity #AbstractingAndIndexing #AcademicJournals #Clarivate #WebOfScience #ScienceOfTheTotalEnvironment

  41. A 2020 paper on using jade amulets to cure COVID has had quite some fallout.

    Three years on, the first author sued his institution, Pittsburgh, because he said their response was discriminatory: retractionwatch.com/2023/08/11. He left the same year and has since founded his own institute for "paradigm shifts".

    Five years on, this case and other problems led Clarivate to delist the journal, Elsevier's Science of the Total Environment, from the Web of Science. english.elpais.com/science-tec

    #ResearchIntegrity #AbstractingAndIndexing #AcademicJournals #Clarivate #WebOfScience #ScienceOfTheTotalEnvironment

  42. A 2020 paper on using jade amulets to cure COVID has had quite some fallout.

    Three years on, the first author sued his institution, Pittsburgh, because he said their response was discriminatory: retractionwatch.com/2023/08/11. He left the same year and has since founded his own institute for "paradigm shifts".

    Five years on, this case and other problems led Clarivate to delist the journal, Elsevier's Science of the Total Environment, from the Web of Science. english.elpais.com/science-tec

    #ResearchIntegrity #AbstractingAndIndexing #AcademicJournals #Clarivate #WebOfScience #ScienceOfTheTotalEnvironment

  43. A 2020 paper on using jade amulets to cure COVID has had quite some fallout.

    Three years on, the first author sued his institution, Pittsburgh, because he said their response was discriminatory: retractionwatch.com/2023/08/11. He left the same year and has since founded his own institute for "paradigm shifts".

    Five years on, this case and other problems led Clarivate to delist the journal, Elsevier's Science of the Total Environment, from the Web of Science. english.elpais.com/science-tec

    #ResearchIntegrity #AbstractingAndIndexing #AcademicJournals #Clarivate #WebOfScience #ScienceOfTheTotalEnvironment

  44. Update. The French 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦 (#CNRS) is canceling the #WebOfScience and encouraging its affiliates to use #OpenAlex. It canceled #Scopus last year.
    cnrs.fr/en/update/cnrs-breakin

    #Clarivate #Elsevier #France #OpenSource #WOS

  45. Update. The French 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦 (#CNRS) is canceling the #WebOfScience and encouraging its affiliates to use #OpenAlex. It canceled #Scopus last year.
    cnrs.fr/en/update/cnrs-breakin

    #Clarivate #Elsevier #France #OpenSource #WOS

  46. Update. The French 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦 (#CNRS) is canceling the #WebOfScience and encouraging its affiliates to use #OpenAlex. It canceled #Scopus last year.
    cnrs.fr/en/update/cnrs-breakin

    #Clarivate #Elsevier #France #OpenSource #WOS

  47. Update. The French 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦 (#CNRS) is canceling the #WebOfScience and encouraging its affiliates to use #OpenAlex. It canceled #Scopus last year.
    cnrs.fr/en/update/cnrs-breakin

    #Clarivate #Elsevier #France #OpenSource #WOS

  48. La #FECYT amb @[email protected] i @[email protected] han programat 6 webinars sobre les bases de dades #WebofScience i #Scopus. 🗓️ Del 2 a l'11 de desembre Inscripcions amb el correu institucional: https://www.recursoscientificos.fecyt.es/servicios/formacion/online