home.social

#responsiblemetrics — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #responsiblemetrics, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Are we measuring Open Science the right way? 🔍
    Indicators shape incentives, researcher behaviour, and funding decisions – so getting them right matters.
    Join OSMI Co-chair Iratxe Puebla & other experts at a free EOSC Track webinar:
    📅 29 May 2026 | 11:00–12:30 CEST
    🔗 eu01web.zoom.us/webinar/regist
    Especially relevant for research policy makers, funders, #CoARA & #EOSC communities.
    #OpenScience #OSMI #ResponsibleMetrics #ResearchReform

  2. Are we measuring Open Science the right way? 🔍
    Indicators shape incentives, researcher behaviour, and funding decisions – so getting them right matters.
    Join OSMI Co-chair Iratxe Puebla & other experts at a free EOSC Track webinar:
    📅 29 May 2026 | 11:00–12:30 CEST
    🔗 eu01web.zoom.us/webinar/regist
    Especially relevant for research policy makers, funders, #CoARA & #EOSC communities.
    #OpenScience #OSMI #ResponsibleMetrics #ResearchReform

  3. Are we measuring Open Science the right way? 🔍
    Indicators shape incentives, researcher behaviour, and funding decisions – so getting them right matters.
    Join OSMI Co-chair Iratxe Puebla & other experts at a free EOSC Track webinar:
    📅 29 May 2026 | 11:00–12:30 CEST
    🔗 eu01web.zoom.us/webinar/regist
    Especially relevant for research policy makers, funders, #CoARA & #EOSC communities.
    #OpenScience #OSMI #ResponsibleMetrics #ResearchReform

  4. Are we measuring Open Science the right way? 🔍
    Indicators shape incentives, researcher behaviour, and funding decisions – so getting them right matters.
    Join OSMI Co-chair Iratxe Puebla & other experts at a free EOSC Track webinar:
    📅 29 May 2026 | 11:00–12:30 CEST
    🔗 eu01web.zoom.us/webinar/regist
    Especially relevant for research policy makers, funders, #CoARA & #EOSC communities.
    #OpenScience #OSMI #ResponsibleMetrics #ResearchReform

  5. Are we measuring Open Science the right way? 🔍
    Indicators shape incentives, researcher behaviour, and funding decisions – so getting them right matters.
    Join OSMI Co-chair Iratxe Puebla & other experts at a free EOSC Track webinar:
    📅 29 May 2026 | 11:00–12:30 CEST
    🔗 eu01web.zoom.us/webinar/regist
    Especially relevant for research policy makers, funders, #CoARA & #EOSC communities.
    #OpenScience #OSMI #ResponsibleMetrics #ResearchReform

  6. Participaré en dos sesiones del Ciclo Iberoamericano de Webinars sobre Gestión de la I+i, desde Consortia:

    29 abril: #OpenScience como enfoque transversal en la gestión de la investigación.

    20 mayo: #ResponsibleMetrics

    en sistemas de evaluación institucional.
    Horario: 10:00–13:00 (GMT-5). Acceso abierto.
    #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment #OpenAccess #ResearchManagement #CienciaAbierta
    🔗docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI

  7. Participaré en dos sesiones del Ciclo Iberoamericano de Webinars sobre Gestión de la I+i, desde Consortia:

    29 abril: #OpenScience como enfoque transversal en la gestión de la investigación.

    20 mayo: #ResponsibleMetrics

    en sistemas de evaluación institucional.
    Horario: 10:00–13:00 (GMT-5). Acceso abierto.
    #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment #OpenAccess #ResearchManagement #CienciaAbierta
    🔗docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI

  8. Participaré en dos sesiones del Ciclo Iberoamericano de Webinars sobre Gestión de la I+i, desde Consortia:

    29 abril: #OpenScience como enfoque transversal en la gestión de la investigación.

    20 mayo: #ResponsibleMetrics

    en sistemas de evaluación institucional.
    Horario: 10:00–13:00 (GMT-5). Acceso abierto.
    #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment #OpenAccess #ResearchManagement #CienciaAbierta
    🔗docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI

  9. Participaré en dos sesiones del Ciclo Iberoamericano de Webinars sobre Gestión de la I+i, desde Consortia:

    29 abril: #OpenScience como enfoque transversal en la gestión de la investigación.

    20 mayo: #ResponsibleMetrics

    en sistemas de evaluación institucional.
    Horario: 10:00–13:00 (GMT-5). Acceso abierto.
    #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment #OpenAccess #ResearchManagement #CienciaAbierta
    🔗docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI

  10. Participaré en dos sesiones del Ciclo Iberoamericano de Webinars sobre Gestión de la I+i, desde Consortia:

    29 abril: #OpenScience como enfoque transversal en la gestión de la investigación.

    20 mayo: #ResponsibleMetrics

    en sistemas de evaluación institucional.
    Horario: 10:00–13:00 (GMT-5). Acceso abierto.
    #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment #OpenAccess #ResearchManagement #CienciaAbierta
    🔗docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI

  11. We evaluate science mostly through papers. But researchers report that up to 75% of project effort is data work — collecting, cleaning, documenting, and preparing datasets. A reminder that research outputs ≠ research work.

    New paper in Research Evaluation: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #DataCitation #ResearchEvaluation

  12. We evaluate science mostly through papers. But researchers report that up to 75% of project effort is data work — collecting, cleaning, documenting, and preparing datasets. A reminder that research outputs ≠ research work.

    New paper in Research Evaluation: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #DataCitation #ResearchEvaluation

  13. We evaluate science mostly through papers. But researchers report that up to 75% of project effort is data work — collecting, cleaning, documenting, and preparing datasets. A reminder that research outputs ≠ research work.

    New paper in Research Evaluation: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #DataCitation #ResearchEvaluation

  14. We evaluate science mostly through papers. But researchers report that up to 75% of project effort is data work — collecting, cleaning, documenting, and preparing datasets. A reminder that research outputs ≠ research work.

    New paper in Research Evaluation: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #DataCitation #ResearchEvaluation

  15. We evaluate science mostly through papers. But researchers report that up to 75% of project effort is data work — collecting, cleaning, documenting, and preparing datasets. A reminder that research outputs ≠ research work.

    New paper in Research Evaluation: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #DataCitation #ResearchEvaluation

  16. Most research evaluation still rewards papers, not the work that makes them possible. Yet researchers say up to 75% of a project can be data work: collecting, cleaning, curating, documenting.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    Maybe it's time to stop pretending that publications alone represent research.

    #OpenScience #ResearchEvaluation #DataCitation #ResponsibleMetrics #Scientometrics

  17. Most research evaluation still rewards papers, not the work that makes them possible. Yet researchers say up to 75% of a project can be data work: collecting, cleaning, curating, documenting.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    Maybe it's time to stop pretending that publications alone represent research.

    #OpenScience #ResearchEvaluation #DataCitation #ResponsibleMetrics #Scientometrics

  18. Most research evaluation still rewards papers, not the work that makes them possible. Yet researchers say up to 75% of a project can be data work: collecting, cleaning, curating, documenting.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    Maybe it's time to stop pretending that publications alone represent research.

    #OpenScience #ResearchEvaluation #DataCitation #ResponsibleMetrics #Scientometrics

  19. Most research evaluation still rewards papers, not the work that makes them possible. Yet researchers say up to 75% of a project can be data work: collecting, cleaning, curating, documenting.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    Maybe it's time to stop pretending that publications alone represent research.

    #OpenScience #ResearchEvaluation #DataCitation #ResponsibleMetrics #Scientometrics

  20. Most research evaluation still rewards papers, not the work that makes them possible. Yet researchers say up to 75% of a project can be data work: collecting, cleaning, curating, documenting.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    Maybe it's time to stop pretending that publications alone represent research.

    #OpenScience #ResearchEvaluation #DataCitation #ResponsibleMetrics #Scientometrics

  21. New paper in Research Evaluation explores how researchers actually cite data. Key insight: data citations are far more complex than simple indicators of data reuse.

    :oa: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    They reflect scientific practice, community norms, attribution, and even reputation-building. A timely reminder: metrics alone cannot capture the real value of data work.

    #OpenScience #DataCitation #ResearchEvaluation #ResponsibleMetrics #Scientometrics

  22. New paper in Research Evaluation explores how researchers actually cite data. Key insight: data citations are far more complex than simple indicators of data reuse.

    :oa: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    They reflect scientific practice, community norms, attribution, and even reputation-building. A timely reminder: metrics alone cannot capture the real value of data work.

    #OpenScience #DataCitation #ResearchEvaluation #ResponsibleMetrics #Scientometrics

  23. New paper in Research Evaluation explores how researchers actually cite data. Key insight: data citations are far more complex than simple indicators of data reuse.

    :oa: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    They reflect scientific practice, community norms, attribution, and even reputation-building. A timely reminder: metrics alone cannot capture the real value of data work.

    #OpenScience #DataCitation #ResearchEvaluation #ResponsibleMetrics #Scientometrics

  24. New paper in Research Evaluation explores how researchers actually cite data. Key insight: data citations are far more complex than simple indicators of data reuse.

    :oa: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    They reflect scientific practice, community norms, attribution, and even reputation-building. A timely reminder: metrics alone cannot capture the real value of data work.

    #OpenScience #DataCitation #ResearchEvaluation #ResponsibleMetrics #Scientometrics

  25. New paper in Research Evaluation explores how researchers actually cite data. Key insight: data citations are far more complex than simple indicators of data reuse.

    :oa: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008

    They reflect scientific practice, community norms, attribution, and even reputation-building. A timely reminder: metrics alone cannot capture the real value of data work.

    #OpenScience #DataCitation #ResearchEvaluation #ResponsibleMetrics #Scientometrics

  26. Where do bibliometricians come from? 🤔 A new international study suggests a simple answer: mostly from academic libraries. Around 60% of people doing bibliometric work at universities are based there.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1177/01655515261417

    The catch? Over 70% say they never had formal training in bibliometrics. People simply grow into the role while working with databases, indicators and research analytics.

    #bibliometrics #scientometrics #researchmetrics #responsiblemetrics #openscience

  27. Where do bibliometricians come from? 🤔 A new international study suggests a simple answer: mostly from academic libraries. Around 60% of people doing bibliometric work at universities are based there.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1177/01655515261417

    The catch? Over 70% say they never had formal training in bibliometrics. People simply grow into the role while working with databases, indicators and research analytics.

    #bibliometrics #scientometrics #researchmetrics #responsiblemetrics #openscience

  28. Where do bibliometricians come from? 🤔 A new international study suggests a simple answer: mostly from academic libraries. Around 60% of people doing bibliometric work at universities are based there.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1177/01655515261417

    The catch? Over 70% say they never had formal training in bibliometrics. People simply grow into the role while working with databases, indicators and research analytics.

    #bibliometrics #scientometrics #researchmetrics #responsiblemetrics #openscience

  29. Where do bibliometricians come from? 🤔 A new international study suggests a simple answer: mostly from academic libraries. Around 60% of people doing bibliometric work at universities are based there.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1177/01655515261417

    The catch? Over 70% say they never had formal training in bibliometrics. People simply grow into the role while working with databases, indicators and research analytics.

    #bibliometrics #scientometrics #researchmetrics #responsiblemetrics #openscience

  30. Where do bibliometricians come from? 🤔 A new international study suggests a simple answer: mostly from academic libraries. Around 60% of people doing bibliometric work at universities are based there.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1177/01655515261417

    The catch? Over 70% say they never had formal training in bibliometrics. People simply grow into the role while working with databases, indicators and research analytics.

    #bibliometrics #scientometrics #researchmetrics #responsiblemetrics #openscience

  31. At #ISSI2025, Mike Thelwall suggested that the Leiden Manifesto should be updated to reflect the rise of large language models (LLMs) in research assessment.

    👉 issi2025.iiap.sci.am/proceedin (P. 71-80)

    He proposed four new principles — calling for transparent prompts, awareness of #LLM instability, cost-benefit considerations, and a reminder that LLM scores are not evidence of scientific contribution.

    #Scientometrics #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #ImpactFactor

  32. At #ISSI2025, Mike Thelwall suggested that the Leiden Manifesto should be updated to reflect the rise of large language models (LLMs) in research assessment.

    👉 issi2025.iiap.sci.am/proceedin (P. 71-80)

    He proposed four new principles — calling for transparent prompts, awareness of #LLM instability, cost-benefit considerations, and a reminder that LLM scores are not evidence of scientific contribution.

    #Scientometrics #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #ImpactFactor

  33. At #ISSI2025, Mike Thelwall suggested that the Leiden Manifesto should be updated to reflect the rise of large language models (LLMs) in research assessment.

    👉 issi2025.iiap.sci.am/proceedin (P. 71-80)

    He proposed four new principles — calling for transparent prompts, awareness of #LLM instability, cost-benefit considerations, and a reminder that LLM scores are not evidence of scientific contribution.

    #Scientometrics #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #ImpactFactor

  34. At #ISSI2025, Mike Thelwall suggested that the Leiden Manifesto should be updated to reflect the rise of large language models (LLMs) in research assessment.

    👉 issi2025.iiap.sci.am/proceedin (P. 71-80)

    He proposed four new principles — calling for transparent prompts, awareness of #LLM instability, cost-benefit considerations, and a reminder that LLM scores are not evidence of scientific contribution.

    #Scientometrics #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #ImpactFactor

  35. At #ISSI2025, Mike Thelwall suggested that the Leiden Manifesto should be updated to reflect the rise of large language models (LLMs) in research assessment.

    👉 issi2025.iiap.sci.am/proceedin (P. 71-80)

    He proposed four new principles — calling for transparent prompts, awareness of #LLM instability, cost-benefit considerations, and a reminder that LLM scores are not evidence of scientific contribution.

    #Scientometrics #ResponsibleMetrics #OpenScience #ImpactFactor

  36. 🇧🇷 vs 🇳🇱 in #ResearchEvaluation? A sharp comparative study shows how Brazil’s high-stakes, performance-based model contrasts with the Netherlands’ strategic, decentralized approach.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaf01

    Takeaway: Evaluation isn’t one-size-fits-all - context matters.

    #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #HigherEducation #ResponsibleMetrics #AcademicEvaluation

  37. 🇧🇷 vs 🇳🇱 in #ResearchEvaluation? A sharp comparative study shows how Brazil’s high-stakes, performance-based model contrasts with the Netherlands’ strategic, decentralized approach.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaf01

    Takeaway: Evaluation isn’t one-size-fits-all - context matters.

    #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #HigherEducation #ResponsibleMetrics #AcademicEvaluation

  38. 🇧🇷 vs 🇳🇱 in #ResearchEvaluation? A sharp comparative study shows how Brazil’s high-stakes, performance-based model contrasts with the Netherlands’ strategic, decentralized approach.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaf01

    Takeaway: Evaluation isn’t one-size-fits-all - context matters.

    #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #HigherEducation #ResponsibleMetrics #AcademicEvaluation

  39. 🇧🇷 vs 🇳🇱 in #ResearchEvaluation? A sharp comparative study shows how Brazil’s high-stakes, performance-based model contrasts with the Netherlands’ strategic, decentralized approach.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaf01

    Takeaway: Evaluation isn’t one-size-fits-all - context matters.

    #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #HigherEducation #ResponsibleMetrics #AcademicEvaluation

  40. 🇧🇷 vs 🇳🇱 in #ResearchEvaluation? A sharp comparative study shows how Brazil’s high-stakes, performance-based model contrasts with the Netherlands’ strategic, decentralized approach.

    :doi: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaf01

    Takeaway: Evaluation isn’t one-size-fits-all - context matters.

    #ResearchAssessment #SciencePolicy #HigherEducation #ResponsibleMetrics #AcademicEvaluation

  41. Este #podcast con un análisis métricos sobre el uso excesivo de métricas para la toma de decisiones me parece que genera muy buenos elementos de discusión. Creo que es valioso escucharlo (me robé un par de ejemplos de allí) open.spotify.com/episode/70nf1 #ResponsibleMetrics

    This #podcast on Metrics' use for decision making has really great ideas. It's wortwhile to listen it (I took a couple of examples from it) #responsiblemetrics
    open.spotify.com/episode/70nf1

  42. Este #podcast con un análisis métricos sobre el uso excesivo de métricas para la toma de decisiones me parece que genera muy buenos elementos de discusión. Creo que es valioso escucharlo (me robé un par de ejemplos de allí) open.spotify.com/episode/70nf1 #ResponsibleMetrics

    This #podcast on Metrics' use for decision making has really great ideas. It's wortwhile to listen it (I took a couple of examples from it) #responsiblemetrics
    open.spotify.com/episode/70nf1

  43. Do you have success stories about universities implemmenting #responsiblemetrics in #ResearchAssessment? I want to build an inventory of such cases.

    Thanks!! #AcademicChatter

  44. Do you have success stories about universities implemmenting #responsiblemetrics in #ResearchAssessment? I want to build an inventory of such cases.

    Thanks!! #AcademicChatter

  45. Do you have success stories about universities implemmenting #responsiblemetrics in #ResearchAssessment? I want to build an inventory of such cases.

    Thanks!! #AcademicChatter

  46. Do you have success stories about universities implemmenting #responsiblemetrics in #ResearchAssessment? I want to build an inventory of such cases.

    Thanks!! #AcademicChatter

  47. "To help implement [research assessment] reforms, here we share a best practice Responsible Research(er) Recruitment Checklist for engaging with the principles of responsible research assessment in the writing of recruitment materials such as job adverts for research and academic roles."

    osf.io/2kgny/

    #ResponsibleMetrics #Recruitment #ResearchCulture #ResearchAssessment #AcademicCareers #AcademicJobs #Checklists #OpenResearch

  48. "To help implement [research assessment] reforms, here we share a best practice Responsible Research(er) Recruitment Checklist for engaging with the principles of responsible research assessment in the writing of recruitment materials such as job adverts for research and academic roles."

    osf.io/2kgny/

    #ResponsibleMetrics #Recruitment #ResearchCulture #ResearchAssessment #AcademicCareers #AcademicJobs #Checklists #OpenResearch

  49. "To help implement [research assessment] reforms, here we share a best practice Responsible Research(er) Recruitment Checklist for engaging with the principles of responsible research assessment in the writing of recruitment materials such as job adverts for research and academic roles."

    osf.io/2kgny/

    #ResponsibleMetrics #Recruitment #ResearchCulture #ResearchAssessment #AcademicCareers #AcademicJobs #Checklists #OpenResearch

  50. "To help implement [research assessment] reforms, here we share a best practice Responsible Research(er) Recruitment Checklist for engaging with the principles of responsible research assessment in the writing of recruitment materials such as job adverts for research and academic roles."

    osf.io/2kgny/

    #ResponsibleMetrics #Recruitment #ResearchCulture #ResearchAssessment #AcademicCareers #AcademicJobs #Checklists #OpenResearch

  51. "To help implement [research assessment] reforms, here we share a best practice Responsible Research(er) Recruitment Checklist for engaging with the principles of responsible research assessment in the writing of recruitment materials such as job adverts for research and academic roles."

    osf.io/2kgny/

    #ResponsibleMetrics #Recruitment #ResearchCulture #ResearchAssessment #AcademicCareers #AcademicJobs #Checklists #OpenResearch

  52. This is a very welcome move for those of us critical of over-reliance on metrics for the evaluation of research quality and impact. It's in keeping with the responsible metrics movement and the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).

    sfdora.org/

    #ResearchMetrics #DORA #ResponsibleMetrics

  53. This is a very welcome move for those of us critical of over-reliance on metrics for the evaluation of research quality and impact. It's in keeping with the responsible metrics movement and the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).

    sfdora.org/

    #ResearchMetrics #DORA #ResponsibleMetrics

  54. This is a very welcome move for those of us critical of over-reliance on metrics for the evaluation of research quality and impact. It's in keeping with the responsible metrics movement and the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).

    sfdora.org/

    #ResearchMetrics #DORA #ResponsibleMetrics

  55. This is a very welcome move for those of us critical of over-reliance on metrics for the evaluation of research quality and impact. It's in keeping with the responsible metrics movement and the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).

    sfdora.org/

    #ResearchMetrics #DORA #ResponsibleMetrics

  56. This is a very welcome move for those of us critical of over-reliance on metrics for the evaluation of research quality and impact. It's in keeping with the responsible metrics movement and the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).

    sfdora.org/

    #ResearchMetrics #DORA #ResponsibleMetrics

  57. Quoting Alan Dix, @lizziegadd says "Metrics are rubbish... but people are (far) worse."

    #PeerReview of outputs can be even more biased (on gender or field, for example) than are #Bibliometrics.

    This supports the use of #ResponsibleMetrics.

    #UKSG2023 #ResearchAssessment

  58. Quoting Alan Dix, @lizziegadd says "Metrics are rubbish... but people are (far) worse."

    #PeerReview of outputs can be even more biased (on gender or field, for example) than are #Bibliometrics.

    This supports the use of #ResponsibleMetrics.

    #UKSG2023 #ResearchAssessment