#hyperauthorship — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #hyperauthorship, aggregated by home.social.
-
A recent Journal of Informetrics study shows – There is no universal number of “too many authors.”
In some fields, 3–6 may already be unusual.
In medicine – dozens are common.
In physics – large teams are often the norm.:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2026.101803
Yes, #hyperauthorship can signal problems (e.g., honorary authorship, metric inflation). But the key question is not “how many authors?” 👉 it is: Is this abnormal for this field and time?
-
A recent Journal of Informetrics study shows – There is no universal number of “too many authors.”
In some fields, 3–6 may already be unusual.
In medicine – dozens are common.
In physics – large teams are often the norm.:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2026.101803
Yes, #hyperauthorship can signal problems (e.g., honorary authorship, metric inflation). But the key question is not “how many authors?” 👉 it is: Is this abnormal for this field and time?
-
A recent Journal of Informetrics study shows – There is no universal number of “too many authors.”
In some fields, 3–6 may already be unusual.
In medicine – dozens are common.
In physics – large teams are often the norm.:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2026.101803
Yes, #hyperauthorship can signal problems (e.g., honorary authorship, metric inflation). But the key question is not “how many authors?” 👉 it is: Is this abnormal for this field and time?
-
A recent Journal of Informetrics study shows – There is no universal number of “too many authors.”
In some fields, 3–6 may already be unusual.
In medicine – dozens are common.
In physics – large teams are often the norm.:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2026.101803
Yes, #hyperauthorship can signal problems (e.g., honorary authorship, metric inflation). But the key question is not “how many authors?” 👉 it is: Is this abnormal for this field and time?
-
A recent Journal of Informetrics study shows – There is no universal number of “too many authors.”
In some fields, 3–6 may already be unusual.
In medicine – dozens are common.
In physics – large teams are often the norm.:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2026.101803
Yes, #hyperauthorship can signal problems (e.g., honorary authorship, metric inflation). But the key question is not “how many authors?” 👉 it is: Is this abnormal for this field and time?
-
Team is coding around the increasingly problematic citations from CERN:
6000 co-authors.Librarians around the world must be forming support groups?
-
Team is coding around the increasingly problematic citations from CERN:
6000 co-authors.Librarians around the world must be forming support groups?
-
Team is coding around the increasingly problematic citations from CERN:
6000 co-authors.Librarians around the world must be forming support groups?
-
Team is coding around the increasingly problematic citations from CERN:
6000 co-authors.Librarians around the world must be forming support groups?
-
Team is coding around the increasingly problematic citations from CERN:
6000 co-authors.Librarians around the world must be forming support groups?
-
Mega-authorship implications: How many scientists can fit into one cell?
#authorship #DanielSDotson #Hyperauthorship #Megaauthorship #Physics #ScholarlyPublishing #ScientificCommunication
-
How many authors are (too) many? A retrospective, descriptive analysis of authorship in biomedical publications
#authorship #BiomedicalResearch #EvaKittl #Hyperauthorship #MartinJakab #Multiauthorship #ScholarlyPublishing #ScientificCommunication #TobiasKiesslich
-
The results of the analysis of biomedical papers in 2000-2020 show that over the past two decades, the average number of authors ✍️ per publication has increased significantly - from 3.99 to 6.25!
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04928-1
#authorship #hyperauthorship #multiauthorship #Scientometrics
-
The results of the analysis of biomedical papers in 2000-2020 show that over the past two decades, the average number of authors ✍️ per publication has increased significantly - from 3.99 to 6.25!
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04928-1
#authorship #hyperauthorship #multiauthorship #Scientometrics
-
The results of the analysis of biomedical papers in 2000-2020 show that over the past two decades, the average number of authors ✍️ per publication has increased significantly - from 3.99 to 6.25!
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04928-1
#authorship #hyperauthorship #multiauthorship #Scientometrics
-
The results of the analysis of biomedical papers in 2000-2020 show that over the past two decades, the average number of authors ✍️ per publication has increased significantly - from 3.99 to 6.25!
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04928-1
#authorship #hyperauthorship #multiauthorship #Scientometrics
-
The results of the analysis of biomedical papers in 2000-2020 show that over the past two decades, the average number of authors ✍️ per publication has increased significantly - from 3.99 to 6.25!
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04928-1
#authorship #hyperauthorship #multiauthorship #Scientometrics
-
How hyperauthorship - more than 100 authors on a scientific paper - is challenging the definition and 'coin' of scientific authorship.
For all the logistical challenges associated with large author lists, it may also be addressing long-standing under-recognition of scientific contributions.
This was such an interesting piece to write for @Nature
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#Science #authorship #Hyperauthorship #Multiauthorship #research -
How hyperauthorship - more than 100 authors on a scientific paper - is challenging the definition and 'coin' of scientific authorship.
For all the logistical challenges associated with large author lists, it may also be addressing long-standing under-recognition of scientific contributions.
This was such an interesting piece to write for @Nature
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#Science #authorship #Hyperauthorship #Multiauthorship #research -
How hyperauthorship - more than 100 authors on a scientific paper - is challenging the definition and 'coin' of scientific authorship.
For all the logistical challenges associated with large author lists, it may also be addressing long-standing under-recognition of scientific contributions.
This was such an interesting piece to write for @Nature
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#Science #authorship #Hyperauthorship #Multiauthorship #research -
How hyperauthorship - more than 100 authors on a scientific paper - is challenging the definition and 'coin' of scientific authorship.
For all the logistical challenges associated with large author lists, it may also be addressing long-standing under-recognition of scientific contributions.
This was such an interesting piece to write for @Nature
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#Science #authorship #Hyperauthorship #Multiauthorship #research -
How hyperauthorship - more than 100 authors on a scientific paper - is challenging the definition and 'coin' of scientific authorship.
For all the logistical challenges associated with large author lists, it may also be addressing long-standing under-recognition of scientific contributions.
This was such an interesting piece to write for @Nature
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#Science #authorship #Hyperauthorship #Multiauthorship #research -
97 authors on the 2018 speleothem isotopes (SISAL) database paper, so it is not quite #hyperauthorship
-
97 authors on the 2018 speleothem isotopes (SISAL) database paper, so it is not quite #hyperauthorship
-
97 authors on the 2018 speleothem isotopes (SISAL) database paper, so it is not quite #hyperauthorship
-
97 authors on the 2018 speleothem isotopes (SISAL) database paper, so it is not quite #hyperauthorship
-
97 authors on the 2018 speleothem isotopes (SISAL) database paper, so it is not quite #hyperauthorship
-
Hyperauthorship - a new trend in academia for papers with hundred of authors. It seems a good thing for supporting equity and diversity, but also has new challenges.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#academia #publishing #science #scicomm #hyperauthorship #authorship #authorshipanalysis
-
Hyperauthorship - a new trend in academia for papers with hundred of authors. It seems a good thing for supporting equity and diversity, but also has new challenges.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#academia #publishing #science #scicomm #hyperauthorship #authorship #authorshipanalysis
-
Hyperauthorship - a new trend in academia for papers with hundred of authors. It seems a good thing for supporting equity and diversity, but also has new challenges.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#academia #publishing #science #scicomm #hyperauthorship #authorship #authorshipanalysis
-
Hyperauthorship - a new trend in academia for papers with hundred of authors. It seems a good thing for supporting equity and diversity, but also has new challenges.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#academia #publishing #science #scicomm #hyperauthorship #authorship #authorshipanalysis
-
Hyperauthorship - a new trend in academia for papers with hundred of authors. It seems a good thing for supporting equity and diversity, but also has new challenges.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
#academia #publishing #science #scicomm #hyperauthorship #authorship #authorshipanalysis