#retractionwatch — Public Fediverse posts

Der Beitrag von Konstantin Schönfelder im ZEVEDI-Verantwortungsblog zeigt, warum das unter generativer KI eine neue Dringlichkeit bekommt: Ungekennzeichnete KI-Nutzung, Textartefakte wie „Regenerate Response“, erfundene Literaturangaben und ein Publikationsbetrieb, der solche Dinge teils offenbar durchwinkt.

Mehr zum ZEVEDI-Verantwortungsblog ⬇️
https://zevedi.de/verantwortungsblog/

#ZEVEDI #VBlog #RetractionWatch #Wissenschaft #Publikationswesen

#RetractionWatch
Papers & #peerreviews with evidence of #ChatGPT writing

Retraction Watch readers have likely heard about papers showing evidence that they were written by ChatGPT. We have reported on the phenomenon.

Here’s a list — relying on a search strategy developed by #GuillaumeCabanac, who has been posting the results on #PubPeer — of such papers that we’ll keep updated regularly. We also recommend Alex Glynn’s Academ-AI. Have a suggested entry? Use this form.
https://retractionwatch.com/papers-and-peer-reviews-with-evidence-of-chatgpt-writing/

Wonderful! Anna Abalkina & the #RetractionWatch blog‬ have put together the Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker. This will help #publishers and #authors who don't want legitimate, high-quality #research #articles ending up in #hijacked #journals. https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-hijacked-journal-checker/
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ak985WGOgGbJRJbZFanoktAN_UFeExpE/edit#gid=364865985

#RetractionWatch says #Scopus, the #abstract & #citation #database of #Elsevier, has removed "all links to the homepages of journals it indexes. ... The move follows revelations that content from dozens of #hijacked #journals had been included in the database." https://retractionwatch.com/2023/12/28/elseviers-scopus-deletes-journal-links-following-revelations-of-hijacked-indexed-journals/