home.social

#arxiv — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #arxiv, aggregated by home.social.

  1. I am preparing my first arXiv submission in math.CO (Combinatorics).
    The manuscript concerns independence complexes of hypergraphs, shellability, vertex-decomposability, and Cohen–Macaulayness. Since this is my first submission in the category, arXiv requires an endorsement.

    If anyone here is an eligible math.CO endorser consider endorsing me, I would be grateful if you could contact me privately. I can send the preprint and the official arXiv endorsement request by DM/email.

    Thank you.

    #mathematics #combinatorics #arXiv #MathCO

  2. I am preparing my first arXiv submission in math.CO (Combinatorics).
    The manuscript concerns independence complexes of hypergraphs, shellability, vertex-decomposability, and Cohen–Macaulayness. Since this is my first submission in the category, arXiv requires an endorsement.

    If anyone here is an eligible math.CO endorser consider endorsing me, I would be grateful if you could contact me privately. I can send the preprint and the official arXiv endorsement request by DM/email.

    Thank you.

    #mathematics #combinatorics #arXiv #MathCO

  3. I am preparing my first arXiv submission in math.CO (Combinatorics).
    The manuscript concerns independence complexes of hypergraphs, shellability, vertex-decomposability, and Cohen–Macaulayness. Since this is my first submission in the category, arXiv requires an endorsement.

    If anyone here is an eligible math.CO endorser consider endorsing me, I would be grateful if you could contact me privately. I can send the preprint and the official arXiv endorsement request by DM/email.

    Thank you.

    #mathematics #combinatorics #arXiv #MathCO

  4. I am preparing my first arXiv submission in math.CO (Combinatorics).
    The manuscript concerns independence complexes of hypergraphs, shellability, vertex-decomposability, and Cohen–Macaulayness. Since this is my first submission in the category, arXiv requires an endorsement.

    If anyone here is an eligible math.CO endorser consider endorsing me, I would be grateful if you could contact me privately. I can send the preprint and the official arXiv endorsement request by DM/email.

    Thank you.

    #mathematics #combinatorics #arXiv #MathCO

  5. I am preparing my first arXiv submission in math.CO (Combinatorics).
    The manuscript concerns independence complexes of hypergraphs, shellability, vertex-decomposability, and Cohen–Macaulayness. Since this is my first submission in the category, arXiv requires an endorsement.

    If anyone here is an eligible math.CO endorser consider endorsing me, I would be grateful if you could contact me privately. I can send the preprint and the official arXiv endorsement request by DM/email.

    Thank you.

    #mathematics #combinatorics #arXiv #MathCO

  6. New #arXiv preprint! I very much enjoyed making some of the figures for this paper about different #nuclear #fusion processes. Here's the CNO "bicycle", responsible for ~2% of solar energy, with branching at solar core temperatures. #Science #AcademicSky #Physics #Astronomy

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.01366

  7. New #arXiv preprint! I very much enjoyed making some of the figures for this paper about different #nuclear #fusion processes. Here's the CNO "bicycle", responsible for ~2% of solar energy, with branching at solar core temperatures. #Science #AcademicSky #Physics #Astronomy

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.01366

  8. New #arXiv preprint! I very much enjoyed making some of the figures for this paper about different #nuclear #fusion processes. Here's the CNO "bicycle", responsible for ~2% of solar energy, with branching at solar core temperatures. #Science #AcademicSky #Physics #Astronomy

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.01366

  9. New #arXiv preprint! I very much enjoyed making some of the figures for this paper about different #nuclear #fusion processes. Here's the CNO "bicycle", responsible for ~2% of solar energy, with branching at solar core temperatures. #Science #AcademicSky #Physics #Astronomy

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.01366

  10. New #arXiv preprint! I very much enjoyed making some of the figures for this paper about different #nuclear #fusion processes. Here's the CNO "bicycle", responsible for ~2% of solar energy, with branching at solar core temperatures. #Science #AcademicSky #Physics #Astronomy

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.01366

  11. New paper on #Arxiv and my first foray into the field of #OpticalComputing (and #MachineLearning , the good one, not LLMs&co).

    We are very used to digital universal (i.e. Turing complete) computers, but it isn't written anywhere that all computation must be digital. Actually, analog computers have a long and glorious history. The advent of transistors meant that digital computers won the war and became ubiquitous, but if instead of a universal machine you want something that does exactly one thing, but very fast and very efficiently, analog systems are often the way to go.

    In particular it is tempting to do computation with light. Light is extremely good at transmitting information, we have excellent technology for both generating and detecting light, and we are VERY good at manipulating it. Furthermore light is FAST, and if you do things correctly losses are low.

    And if there is something that would benefit from being made massively parallel, fast, and with limited energy consumption it is machine learning. Now, not all forms of machine learning suit light well. People try to make deep neural networks using light, but I am not convinced that this approach has legs. A less popular approach to machine learning that is a perfect fit for light and optics is "reservoir computing", where you have a large recurring network where all the weights (i.e. how strong the connections between the nodes are) are fixed, and you only train a single linear layer (effectively you just do a linear regression) at the output of the network.

    1/3

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.02733

  12. New paper on #Arxiv and my first foray into the field of #OpticalComputing (and #MachineLearning , the good one, not LLMs&co).

    We are very used to digital universal (i.e. Turing complete) computers, but it isn't written anywhere that all computation must be digital. Actually, analog computers have a long and glorious history. The advent of transistors meant that digital computers won the war and became ubiquitous, but if instead of a universal machine you want something that does exactly one thing, but very fast and very efficiently, analog systems are often the way to go.

    In particular it is tempting to do computation with light. Light is extremely good at transmitting information, we have excellent technology for both generating and detecting light, and we are VERY good at manipulating it. Furthermore light is FAST, and if you do things correctly losses are low.

    And if there is something that would benefit from being made massively parallel, fast, and with limited energy consumption it is machine learning. Now, not all forms of machine learning suit light well. People try to make deep neural networks using light, but I am not convinced that this approach has legs. A less popular approach to machine learning that is a perfect fit for light and optics is "reservoir computing", where you have a large recurring network where all the weights (i.e. how strong the connections between the nodes are) are fixed, and you only train a single linear layer (effectively you just do a linear regression) at the output of the network.

    1/3

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.02733

  13. New paper on #Arxiv and my first foray into the field of #OpticalComputing (and #MachineLearning , the good one, not LLMs&co).

    We are very used to digital universal (i.e. Turing complete) computers, but it isn't written anywhere that all computation must be digital. Actually, analog computers have a long and glorious history. The advent of transistors meant that digital computers won the war and became ubiquitous, but if instead of a universal machine you want something that does exactly one thing, but very fast and very efficiently, analog systems are often the way to go.

    In particular it is tempting to do computation with light. Light is extremely good at transmitting information, we have excellent technology for both generating and detecting light, and we are VERY good at manipulating it. Furthermore light is FAST, and if you do things correctly losses are low.

    And if there is something that would benefit from being made massively parallel, fast, and with limited energy consumption it is machine learning. Now, not all forms of machine learning suit light well. People try to make deep neural networks using light, but I am not convinced that this approach has legs. A less popular approach to machine learning that is a perfect fit for light and optics is "reservoir computing", where you have a large recurring network where all the weights (i.e. how strong the connections between the nodes are) are fixed, and you only train a single linear layer (effectively you just do a linear regression) at the output of the network.

    1/3

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.02733

  14. New paper on #Arxiv and my first foray into the field of #OpticalComputing (and #MachineLearning , the good one, not LLMs&co).

    We are very used to digital universal (i.e. Turing complete) computers, but it isn't written anywhere that all computation must be digital. Actually, analog computers have a long and glorious history. The advent of transistors meant that digital computers won the war and became ubiquitous, but if instead of a universal machine you want something that does exactly one thing, but very fast and very efficiently, analog systems are often the way to go.

    In particular it is tempting to do computation with light. Light is extremely good at transmitting information, we have excellent technology for both generating and detecting light, and we are VERY good at manipulating it. Furthermore light is FAST, and if you do things correctly losses are low.

    And if there is something that would benefit from being made massively parallel, fast, and with limited energy consumption it is machine learning. Now, not all forms of machine learning suit light well. People try to make deep neural networks using light, but I am not convinced that this approach has legs. A less popular approach to machine learning that is a perfect fit for light and optics is "reservoir computing", where you have a large recurring network where all the weights (i.e. how strong the connections between the nodes are) are fixed, and you only train a single linear layer (effectively you just do a linear regression) at the output of the network.

    1/3

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.02733

  15. New paper on #Arxiv and my first foray into the field of #OpticalComputing (and #MachineLearning , the good one, not LLMs&co).

    We are very used to digital universal (i.e. Turing complete) computers, but it isn't written anywhere that all computation must be digital. Actually, analog computers have a long and glorious history. The advent of transistors meant that digital computers won the war and became ubiquitous, but if instead of a universal machine you want something that does exactly one thing, but very fast and very efficiently, analog systems are often the way to go.

    In particular it is tempting to do computation with light. Light is extremely good at transmitting information, we have excellent technology for both generating and detecting light, and we are VERY good at manipulating it. Furthermore light is FAST, and if you do things correctly losses are low.

    And if there is something that would benefit from being made massively parallel, fast, and with limited energy consumption it is machine learning. Now, not all forms of machine learning suit light well. People try to make deep neural networks using light, but I am not convinced that this approach has legs. A less popular approach to machine learning that is a perfect fit for light and optics is "reservoir computing", where you have a large recurring network where all the weights (i.e. how strong the connections between the nodes are) are fixed, and you only train a single linear layer (effectively you just do a linear regression) at the output of the network.

    1/3

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.02733

  16. Wow 98,000 peculiar velocities

    The DESI DR1 Peculiar Velocity Survey: Fundamental Plane Catalogue
    by C.E. Ross and co-authors
    arxiv.org/abs/2512.03226

    For comparison: the Great Attractor was discovered with 400 PVs, Laniakea with 8000 PVs, South Pole Wall with 18,000 PVs

    #Cosmicflows #Cosmology #DESI #Laniakea #GreatAttractor #SouthPoleWall #science #news #astrodon #arXiv #galaxies #peculiarvelocities

  17. in the #arXiv

    Revealing Hidden Cosmic Flows through the Zone of Avoidance with Deep Learning

    by Alexandra Dupuy and co-authors
    arxiv.org/abs/2511.03919

    #Cosmology #Cosmicflows #GreatAttractor #Laniakea