home.social

#arxiv — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #arxiv, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Today on the #arXiv:

    Batygin et al. 2026, "Terminal instability of the Solar System triggered by stochastic solar mass loss" - arxiv.org/abs/2609.12494.

    We know that the inner planets will eventually fall into the red giant Sun, unless they scatter first. The gas giants likely scatter afterwards.

  2. Кто на самом деле сломал вашего ИИ-агента: модель или обвязка?

    Когда агент в проде ошибается, спор идёт по кругу: модель тупит, промпт кривой, API виноват. Свежая работа Scale AI даёт отказам адрес — ребро между компонентами и сторону вины. Оказывается, «виновата модель» почти никогда не значит «чинить дообучением»: разбираю таксономию из 41 режима, каталог-выжимку и четыре своих отказа с числами — ни один не закрыт сменой модели.

    habr.com/ru/articles/1079638/

    #LLM #ИИагенты #agent_harness #обвязка #таксономия_отказов #RAG #отладка #метрики #тестирование #arXiv

  3. Rxiv mechanobio
    @Rxiv_mechanobio • Joined: Nov 05, 2024

    I toot papers from #PubMed and preprints from #bioRxiv & #arXiv that seem to pertain to mechanobiology.
    My filter can be tested there on PubMed: link.infini.fr/mechanobiology_
    Improvement suggestions in this filter welcome, both to add or remove spurious results: contact @jocelyn_etienne

    #bot #BotsOfMastodon

  4. @cosmology @pomarede @redshiftdrift

    In their article that is *still* not on #ArXiv, looks like #SylosLabini+#Galoppo made two elementary mistakes.

    @TillSawala has reanalysed the data, and presented a convincing case that SylosLabini+Galoppo forgot about #little_h and accidentally used #LuminosityDistance s instead of #ComovingDistance s [2]. See Fig 9, and p14 (15th page) of the pdf.

    So much for #Nature's peer review standards ...

    #TillSawala

    [2] #ArXiv_2607_01172 arxiv.org/abs/2607.01172

  5. #arXiv:
    "The fate of Earth during the Sun’s giant phases: New constraints from ab initio tidal modelling and AGB mass loss"
    "..need for improved constraints on .. late-stages of stellar evolut. .. .. considering observat. proxies for .. Sun during .. AGB phase, it is likely .. Earth will survive .. Sun's giant phases."
    arxiv.org/abs/2606.19575

    17.6.2026

    #AsymptoticGiantBranch #Earth #Erde #Gezeitendissipation #Gravitation #RoterRiese #Sonne #Star #StellarEvolution #Stern #Sternentwicklung #Sun

  6. @jonmsterling

    They explain that there are simply too many ultra-low quality reviews posted.

    #bioRxiv has not been accepting to archive reviews for years already (at least since 2017). Their FAQ says it's irrelevant as #preprint because they're not novel in themselves, but I believe part of the reason is also that there's a flooding of dodgy reviews.

    #arXiv

    nature.com/articles/d41586-025

    web.archive.org/web/2017041904

  7. @sfmatheson @steveroyle @neuralreckoning @biorxivpreprint

    #biorxiv is very strict about experimental only. I have never been able to get a paper without a methods section past biorxiv.

    I want a preprint server that people will look at. So just putting it up on a website isn't good enough for me. I think of OSF and zenodo as places for data, not manuscripts.

    Still have no freakin' clue what #arxiv is smokin' here.

    Open to ideas.

  8. So if preprint servers reject papers editorially without review or possibility of appeal, how are they different from gatekeeping journals, except without peer review or editorial responsibility.

    (The editors at #arxiv and #biorxiv are unclear, unknown, and apparently answer to no one?)

    #AcademicPublishing #preprints

  9. #Heise:
    "
    Winzige Schriftart, weiße Farbe: Versteckte KI-Prompts in Fachartikeln entdeckt
    "
    "Vor einer richtigen Veröffentlichung müssen wissenschaftliche Artikel geprüft werden. Damit das keine KI übernimmt, werden in einigen KI-Prompts versteckt."

    heise.de/news/Gib-nur-positive

    7.7.2025

    #AI #Arxiv #Bewertung #Fachartikel #Forschung #KI #Nikkei #PeerReview #Preview #Prompt #Review #Wissenschaft

  10. Dear #reviewer,

    Complaining that I don't cite 2 (or more!) papers that, coincidentally 😉, are authored by you is, 99% of the time, blatant (and stupid) self-promotion. And if one is an #arxiv paper from this year, well, that's just ludicrous.

    I wish reviewing systems include some sanity checks / alarm triggers 🚨 that force #PCChairs to double-check this unethical behaviours.

    (another pet peeve of mine when it comes to reviews is New Ideas tracks rejecting papers because of insufficient validation. Honestly, I think every #conference should include a #track for real #new #ideas where any type of validation is explicitly #forbidden as argument).

  11. Today is the day!

    We get a double 🤗🤗 match for every 🙂 donation to arXiv's #GivingDay fund.

    Hats off to the team at Hugging Face for supporting Open Science through and through!

    👉 givingday.cornell.edu/campaign

    #arXiv