#scholarlypublishing — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #scholarlypublishing, aggregated by home.social.
-
#Editors, #managers, #designers et al in #ScholarlyPublishing, you'll want to read this about making #image #integrity #screening possible in the #editorial #workflow: https://www.sspnet.org/community/news/aries-systems-and-imagetwin-partner-to-enable-image-integrity-screening-in-the-editorial-workflow/
-
#Editors, #managers, #designers et al in #ScholarlyPublishing, you'll want to read this about making #image #integrity #screening possible in the #editorial #workflow: https://www.sspnet.org/community/news/aries-systems-and-imagetwin-partner-to-enable-image-integrity-screening-in-the-editorial-workflow/
-
#Editors, #managers, #designers et al in #ScholarlyPublishing, you'll want to read this about making #image #integrity #screening possible in the #editorial #workflow: https://www.sspnet.org/community/news/aries-systems-and-imagetwin-partner-to-enable-image-integrity-screening-in-the-editorial-workflow/
-
#Editors, #managers, #designers et al in #ScholarlyPublishing, you'll want to read this about making #image #integrity #screening possible in the #editorial #workflow: https://www.sspnet.org/community/news/aries-systems-and-imagetwin-partner-to-enable-image-integrity-screening-in-the-editorial-workflow/
-
#Editors, #managers, #designers et al in #ScholarlyPublishing, you'll want to read this about making #image #integrity #screening possible in the #editorial #workflow: https://www.sspnet.org/community/news/aries-systems-and-imagetwin-partner-to-enable-image-integrity-screening-in-the-editorial-workflow/
-
Using LLMs to help you write papers doesn’t help you get them published
HT Nik John for sending me this fascinating paper by the editors of Organisational Science. If you’re interested in AI and scholarly publishing, read this paper: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2026.ed.v37.n3
The highlight for me was the finding
A clear pattern emerges above 30% AI use. Manuscripts crossing this threshold have desk rejection rates nearly 30 percentage points higher than those below it, a 60%–80% relative increase. By the end of the editorial funnel, only 3.2% of high-AI papers (70%+ AI) receive Revise & Resubmit decisions, compared with over three times that rate among low-AI submissions. In other words, editors, likely without recognizing the writing as AI-generated, consistently judged these manuscripts as lower quality and unworthy of reviewers’ time. Interestingly, submissions in the 15%–30% range show a slight increase in success rates, possibly reflecting a more human-first collaboration mode or differences in authors, topics, and other factors that we cannot disentangle.
This to me feels absolutely key. If this is established across multiple domains it becomes the foundation for a renewed normativity about LLM use. The incentives for individual acceleration are real, the rewards for it are not. Going faster with LLMs doesn’t produce the outcomes you’re actually looking for. It also generates a whole range of externalities that make your working life less pleasant, as well as everyone else’s.
#acceleratedAcademy #acceleration #AI #scholarlyPublishing #writing -
Using LLMs to help you write papers doesn’t help you get them published
HT Nik John for sending me this fascinating paper by the editors of Organisational Science. If you’re interested in AI and scholarly publishing, read this paper: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2026.ed.v37.n3
The highlight for me was the finding about editorial outcomes:
A clear pattern emerges above 30% AI use. Manuscripts crossing this threshold have desk rejection rates nearly 30 percentage points higher than those below it, a 60%–80% relative increase. By the end of the editorial funnel, only 3.2% of high-AI papers (70%+ AI) receive Revise & Resubmit decisions, compared with over three times that rate among low-AI submissions. In other words, editors, likely without recognizing the writing as AI-generated, consistently judged these manuscripts as lower quality and unworthy of reviewers’ time. Interestingly, submissions in the 15%–30% range show a slight increase in success rates, possibly reflecting a more human-first collaboration mode or differences in authors, topics, and other factors that we cannot disentangle.
This to me feels absolutely key. If this is established across multiple domains it becomes the foundation for a renewed normativity about LLM use. The incentives for individual acceleration are real, the rewards for it are not. Going faster with LLMs doesn’t produce the outcomes you’re actually looking for. It also generates a whole range of externalities that make your working life less pleasant, as well as everyone else’s.
#acceleratedAcademy #acceleration #AI #scholarlyPublishing #writing -
Using LLMs to help you write papers doesn’t help you get them published
HT Nik John for sending me this fascinating paper by the editors of Organisational Science. If you’re interested in AI and scholarly publishing, read this paper: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2026.ed.v37.n3
The highlight for me was the finding about editorial outcomes:
A clear pattern emerges above 30% AI use. Manuscripts crossing this threshold have desk rejection rates nearly 30 percentage points higher than those below it, a 60%–80% relative increase. By the end of the editorial funnel, only 3.2% of high-AI papers (70%+ AI) receive Revise & Resubmit decisions, compared with over three times that rate among low-AI submissions. In other words, editors, likely without recognizing the writing as AI-generated, consistently judged these manuscripts as lower quality and unworthy of reviewers’ time. Interestingly, submissions in the 15%–30% range show a slight increase in success rates, possibly reflecting a more human-first collaboration mode or differences in authors, topics, and other factors that we cannot disentangle.
This to me feels absolutely key. If this is established across multiple domains it becomes the foundation for a renewed normativity about LLM use. The incentives for individual acceleration are real, the rewards for it are not. Going faster with LLMs doesn’t produce the outcomes you’re actually looking for. It also generates a whole range of externalities that make your working life less pleasant, as well as everyone else’s.
#acceleratedAcademy #acceleration #AI #scholarlyPublishing #writing -
Using LLMs to help you write papers doesn’t help you get them published
HT Nik John for sending me this fascinating paper by the editors of Organisational Science. If you’re interested in AI and scholarly publishing, read this paper: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2026.ed.v37.n3
The highlight for me was the finding about editorial outcomes:
A clear pattern emerges above 30% AI use. Manuscripts crossing this threshold have desk rejection rates nearly 30 percentage points higher than those below it, a 60%–80% relative increase. By the end of the editorial funnel, only 3.2% of high-AI papers (70%+ AI) receive Revise & Resubmit decisions, compared with over three times that rate among low-AI submissions. In other words, editors, likely without recognizing the writing as AI-generated, consistently judged these manuscripts as lower quality and unworthy of reviewers’ time. Interestingly, submissions in the 15%–30% range show a slight increase in success rates, possibly reflecting a more human-first collaboration mode or differences in authors, topics, and other factors that we cannot disentangle.
This to me feels absolutely key. If this is established across multiple domains it becomes the foundation for a renewed normativity about LLM use. The incentives for individual acceleration are real, the rewards for it are not. Going faster with LLMs doesn’t produce the outcomes you’re actually looking for. It also generates a whole range of externalities that make your working life less pleasant, as well as everyone else’s.
#acceleratedAcademy #acceleration #AI #scholarlyPublishing #writing -
Using LLMs to help you write papers doesn’t help you get them published
HT Nik John for sending me this fascinating paper by the editors of Organisational Science. If you’re interested in AI and scholarly publishing, read this paper: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2026.ed.v37.n3
The highlight for me was the finding about editorial outcomes:
A clear pattern emerges above 30% AI use. Manuscripts crossing this threshold have desk rejection rates nearly 30 percentage points higher than those below it, a 60%–80% relative increase. By the end of the editorial funnel, only 3.2% of high-AI papers (70%+ AI) receive Revise & Resubmit decisions, compared with over three times that rate among low-AI submissions. In other words, editors, likely without recognizing the writing as AI-generated, consistently judged these manuscripts as lower quality and unworthy of reviewers’ time. Interestingly, submissions in the 15%–30% range show a slight increase in success rates, possibly reflecting a more human-first collaboration mode or differences in authors, topics, and other factors that we cannot disentangle.
This to me feels absolutely key. If this is established across multiple domains it becomes the foundation for a renewed normativity about LLM use. The incentives for individual acceleration are real, the rewards for it are not. Going faster with LLMs doesn’t produce the outcomes you’re actually looking for. It also generates a whole range of externalities that make your working life less pleasant, as well as everyone else’s.
#acceleratedAcademy #acceleration #AI #scholarlyPublishing #writing -
The list of Diamond OA Journals that applied for the #CoDOA funding scheme is now online 💎
-
Dartmouth College: New Guidelines Created for Publishing Indigenous Data. “To ensure that Indigenous peoples’ rights and knowledge are recognized in scientific data and scholarly publishing, a team of Indigenous scholars led by Lydia Jennings, an assistant professor of environmental studies, has established Guidelines for the Governance of Indigenous Peoples’ Data in Scholarly Publishing.”
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/09/09/dartmouth-college-new-guidelines-created-for-publishing-indigenous-data/ -
Dartmouth College: New Guidelines Created for Publishing Indigenous Data. “To ensure that Indigenous peoples’ rights and knowledge are recognized in scientific data and scholarly publishing, a team of Indigenous scholars led by Lydia Jennings, an assistant professor of environmental studies, has established Guidelines for the Governance of Indigenous Peoples’ Data in Scholarly Publishing.”
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/09/09/dartmouth-college-new-guidelines-created-for-publishing-indigenous-data/ -
Dartmouth College: New Guidelines Created for Publishing Indigenous Data. “To ensure that Indigenous peoples’ rights and knowledge are recognized in scientific data and scholarly publishing, a team of Indigenous scholars led by Lydia Jennings, an assistant professor of environmental studies, has established Guidelines for the Governance of Indigenous Peoples’ Data in Scholarly Publishing.”
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/09/09/dartmouth-college-new-guidelines-created-for-publishing-indigenous-data/ -
Dartmouth College: New Guidelines Created for Publishing Indigenous Data. “To ensure that Indigenous peoples’ rights and knowledge are recognized in scientific data and scholarly publishing, a team of Indigenous scholars led by Lydia Jennings, an assistant professor of environmental studies, has established Guidelines for the Governance of Indigenous Peoples’ Data in Scholarly Publishing.”
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/09/09/dartmouth-college-new-guidelines-created-for-publishing-indigenous-data/ -
Dartmouth College: New Guidelines Created for Publishing Indigenous Data. “To ensure that Indigenous peoples’ rights and knowledge are recognized in scientific data and scholarly publishing, a team of Indigenous scholars led by Lydia Jennings, an assistant professor of environmental studies, has established Guidelines for the Governance of Indigenous Peoples’ Data in Scholarly Publishing.”
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/09/09/dartmouth-college-new-guidelines-created-for-publishing-indigenous-data/ -
Oggi siamo all'università di Zadar, in Croazia! 🇭🇷🌊
In occasione della conferenza #pubmet2026 sulla comunicazione nella Scienza Aperta, presenteremo il modello di Milano University Press: una casa editrice accademica Diamond Open Access per una comunicazione scientifica di qualità, al servizio dell'accademia e della società 💎
#OpenAccess #OpenScience #MilanoUniversityPress #UniversitàDegliStudiDiMilano #EditoriaAccademica #DiamondOpenAccess #Ricerca #ScholarlyPublishing
-
Oggi siamo all'università di Zadar, in Croazia! 🇭🇷🌊
In occasione della conferenza #pubmet2026 sulla comunicazione nella Scienza Aperta, presenteremo il modello di Milano University Press: una casa editrice accademica Diamond Open Access per una comunicazione scientifica di qualità, al servizio dell'accademia e della società 💎
#OpenAccess #OpenScience #MilanoUniversityPress #UniversitàDegliStudiDiMilano #EditoriaAccademica #DiamondOpenAccess #Ricerca #ScholarlyPublishing
-
Oggi siamo all'università di Zadar, in Croazia! 🇭🇷🌊
In occasione della conferenza #pubmet2026 sulla comunicazione nella Scienza Aperta, presenteremo il modello di Milano University Press: una casa editrice accademica Diamond Open Access per una comunicazione scientifica di qualità, al servizio dell'accademia e della società 💎
#OpenAccess #OpenScience #MilanoUniversityPress #UniversitàDegliStudiDiMilano #EditoriaAccademica #DiamondOpenAccess #Ricerca #ScholarlyPublishing
-
Oggi siamo all'università di Zadar, in Croazia! 🇭🇷🌊
In occasione della conferenza #pubmet2026 sulla comunicazione nella Scienza Aperta, presenteremo il modello di Milano University Press: una casa editrice accademica Diamond Open Access per una comunicazione scientifica di qualità, al servizio dell'accademia e della società 💎
#OpenAccess #OpenScience #MilanoUniversityPress #UniversitàDegliStudiDiMilano #EditoriaAccademica #DiamondOpenAccess #Ricerca #ScholarlyPublishing
-
Oggi siamo all'università di Zadar, in Croazia! 🇭🇷🌊
In occasione della conferenza #pubmet2026 sulla comunicazione nella Scienza Aperta, presenteremo il modello di Milano University Press: una casa editrice accademica Diamond Open Access per una comunicazione scientifica di qualità, al servizio dell'accademia e della società 💎
#OpenAccess #OpenScience #MilanoUniversityPress #UniversitàDegliStudiDiMilano #EditoriaAccademica #DiamondOpenAccess #Ricerca #ScholarlyPublishing
-
The OA Switchboard plugin for OJS 3.5 is now available!
Once enabled, the plugin automatically sends public article metadata to relevant research funders and institutions when an article is published. The metadata is captured at the point of publication and shared with the institutions affiliated with the article’s authors and the funders supporting the underlying research.
➡️ https://www.oaswitchboard.org/news/available-oa-switchboard-plugin-for-ojs-3.5
#OpenJournalSystems #OpenAccess #metadata #ResearchFunders #ScholarlyPublishing #FOSS
-
📢 Join our team! PKP is hiring a contract software developer
➡️ PKP has been developing and maintaining the world's most used software for #OpenAccess for more than 25 years.
➡️ Code the future of PKP's software applications and work on truly distributed, open source software for #ScholarlyPublishing!
Learn more and apply at https://pkp.sfu.ca/2026/07/31/pkp-software-developer-opportunity/
#Code4Lib #OpenInfra #OpenSource #OpenSourceJobs #ScholComm #OpenJournalSystems #OpenMonographPress #OpenPreprintSystems
-
🌍 Curious about the global landscape of journals using #OpenJournalSystems (OJS) in 2025? Check out this interactive visualization using PKP Beacon Data!
With data on 62,549 active journals using OJS, click on a country to get its overall rank and rank in the region, number of active journals, number of articles published, and software version use.
Built by Nate Wright. Explore at https://pkpbeacon.notthisway.com/
#PKPBeacon #ScholComm #ScholarlyPublishing #OpenAccess #AcademicChatter
-
📢 Join our team! PKP is hiring a contract software developer ➡️
Code the future of PKP's software applications and work on truly distributed, open source software for #ScholarlyPublishing!
Consider applying even if you don’t feel that your background is a 100% match with the role description.
Apply at https://pkp.sfu.ca/2026/07/31/pkp-software-developer-opportunity/
@ORCID_Org @crossref @ResearchOrgs @DOAJ @tibhannover @TIBopenpub @investinopen @SCOSSfunding
#OpenJournalSystems #OpenMonographPress #OpenPreprintSystems
-
Upload, transform, publish: Inside OJS 3.6's file production and toolset -- A closer look at the new OJS 3.6 features and tools that turn a submission file into on-demand JATS, HTML, and PDF galley files.
This article is part of the Development Dispatch Feature that Magnus Lu regularly contributes to in the PKP Community Newsletter, Archipelago.
Check it out!
https://pkp.sfu.ca/2026/07/21/inside-ojs-3-6-file-production-and-toolset/
#OpenJournalSystems #JATS #HTML #PDF #FOSS #ScholarlyPublishing
-
On 23 July, we're running a Metadata Health Check session focused on the Crossref OJS plugin, covering how to deposit complete, quality #metadata with Crossref using OJS 3.3 and 3.4, how to troubleshoot common deposit issues, and how to use Crossref Participation Reports to assess your metadata quality.
📅 23 July 2026, 16:00 UTC
🔗 Register: https://crossref.zoom.us/webinar/register/6117834264022/WN_wiV1TYNjRVGckitTk22DrA#OJS #OpenJournalSystems #ResearchMetadata #ScholarlyPublishing
-
More than 58,000 journals across 156 countries are using #OpenJournalSystems!
About 2.5 M articles are published per year, and there is steady growth in OJS installation upgrades for better features, usability, #multilingualism, #metadata and #interoperability.
The latest #OJSBeaconData highlights the collective impact of our global communities and helps shape the future of #ScholarlyPublishing.
Here’s what the data tells us at https://pkp.sfu.ca/2026/04/15/58000-journals-2025-ojs-beacon-data/
-
🤝Join PKP & Crossref on June 17 for a step-by-step walkthrough of upgrading from OJS 3.x to OJS 3.5, the upcoming Long Term Support release.
Latest features, performance improvements & critical security updates await!
#OpenJournalSystems #OpenAccess #DiamondOpenAccess #ScholComm #ScholarlyPublishing #AcademicChatter #Metadata #DOIs #JournalManagers #JournalEditors #ojsSystemAdmins
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@PublicKnowledgeProject/116569439260984869
Apply by June 5th to join PKP as Associate Director in charge of Publishing Services:
Help folks using PKP software for independent, scholar-led #ScholarlyPublishing get hosting and other services so they can increase the reach, quality and diversity of their work for the global public good! ⤵️
#OpenJournalSystems #OpenMonographPress #OpenPreprintSystems #OpenAccess #DiamondOpenAccess #Publishing
-
🤝 PKP and Crossref continue to join forces – this time to provide for folks who wish to upgrade to OJS 3.5. Upgrading means not only will you be more a part of the scholarly publishing ecosystem, but you will have more journal stability, security, and workflow efficiency. Join us to learn more! https://bit.ly/4ab9baF
#OpenJournalSystems #OpenAccess #DiamondOpenAccess #ScholComm #ScholarlyPublishing #AcademicChatter #Metadata #DOIs #JournalManagers #JournalEditors #ojsSystemAdmins
-
🤝 Discover why upgrading to OJS 3.5 is an important step for journal stability, security, and workflow efficiency.
This presentation by the @PublicKnowledgeProject and Crossref will familiarize you with key improvements and changes to OJS with the release of version 3.5, the latest version of OJS slated for a long-term support designation this summer.
https://bit.ly/4ab9baF#OpenJournalSystems #OpenAccess #ScholarlyPublishing #AcademicChatter #Metadata #JournalEditors
-
🤝 Is upgrading to OJS 3.5 important for your journal stability, security, and workflow? Join us in an upcoming event to learn more:
📅 June 3 2026, 8 PDT: PKP and @crossref.bsky.social present – Introducing OJS 3.5: Key features and user enhancements
Journal managers and editors using OJS, this one's for you!
Can't make it? Register anyway and get the recording:
#OpenJournalSystems #ScholarlyPublishing #ScholComm #OpenAccess #DiamondOpenAccess
-
The PKP Warsaw Sprint 2026 is underway, bringing communities together from all around the world to improve PKP #ScholarlyPublishing software.
We'd like to thank our sponsors for helping make this event possible!
Thank you @datacite, @crossref, and Paradigm (https://www.paradigmpublishingservices.com/) for your support. We are so fortunate for such a strong community working for the future!
#pkpWaw2026 #OpenJournalSystems #OpenMonographPress #OpenPreprintSystems #OpenInfrastructure #OpenAccess #FOSS #SustainOpen
-
CIDRAP: Review uncovers rising rate of fake references in published biomedical papers. “A systematic review published yesterday in The Lancet reveals that of 97.1 million verified references in published biomedical papers, 4,046 were likely fake, with rates of fabrication rising 12-fold from 2023 through 2025—which commentators call a disturbing discovery that highlights the need to improve […]
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/05/12/cidrap-review-uncovers-rising-rate-of-fake-references-in-published-biomedical-papers/ -
⚙️ Hi all, you are invited to the next PKP Development News Update Webinar, May 25th, 8 AM PT!
Topics and speakers:
⚙️ Production Workflow (Alec Smecher; Jarda Kotěšovec)
⚙️ Published Manuscript Under Review workflow (Erik Hanson)
⚙️ Media Gallery (Erik Hanson)
Details and registration: https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/pkps-development-news-webinar-may-2026-tickets-1975856513019?aff=ebdsoporgprofile
Hope to meet you there!
#OpenJournalSystems #OpenMonographPress #OpenPreprintSystems #FOSS #ScholarlyPublishing
@DOAJ @ResearchOrgs @crossref @SCOSSfunding @investinopen @tibhannover
-
🌱 New PKP School courses for OJS 3.5 are now available in English and Spanish! / ¡Los nuevos cursos de PKP School para OJS 3.5 ya están disponibles en inglés y español!
➡️ Learn how to set up your new journal and manage the editorial workflow using OJS
➡️ Aprenda cómo configurar su nueva revista y gestionar el flujo de trabajo editorial utilizando OJS
#PKPSchool #OpenJournalSystems #OpenEducationResources #OER #OpenAccess #ScholarlyPublishing #AcademicChatter
-
💎 In PKP's Archipelago, Regional Feature: Reflections from the 3rd Global Summit on #DiamondOpenAccess in conversation with Mark Huskisson (@markhusk)
This article is packed full! India #OA landscape, #OpenJournalSystems use, important takeaways and more:
https://pkp.sfu.ca/2026/03/31/reflections-3rd-global-summit-diamond-open-access-mark-huskisson/
Some mentions in the article: @tibhannover @DOAJ @crossref @SCOSSfunding @unesco
#OpenAccess #DiamondOA #ScholComm #ScholarlyPublishing #FOSS #OpenInfrastructure #AcademicChatter
-
📰 Inside PKP's community newsletter, "Archipelago"!
Interview with PKP's new Managing Director, Teresa Lee
Demystifying #FOSS with Alec Smecher @asmecher
Reflections - 3rd Global Summit on #DiamondOA with Mark Huskisson @markhusk
#OpenJournalSystems OJS 3.6 task history / improved notifications with Magnus Lu
Publication Facts Label #PFLabel with PKP Founder John Willinsky
And more to access all in one place: https://lists.publicknowledgeproject.org/archive/archipelago-issue-10-march-2026-5878
-
Our program leads are working together to be more transparent, coordinate more effectively, and build helpful structures that support our goals. It's still early days, but we're committed to learning in the open. More in our latest update: https://doi.org/10.64000/4s2ee-wkr84 #programmanagement #metadatamatters #scholcomms #scholarlypublishing
-
❤️ Happy Love Data Week! #Metadata offers context and insights into how scholarly works came to be shared and connected. See what you can learn about scholarship from the #researchnexus this #LoveData25. The Crossref API Learning Hub provides resources to help #researchers access metadata for studying #scholarlypublishing, funding trends, and citation patterns. Explore metadata retrieval and analysis tools here: crossref.org/learning
-
We're hiring! Join our team as a Director of Programs & Services and help progress #openscience worldwide. If you are a community-minded, analytical, and highly organized individual, then this position is for you!
Location: RemoteType: Full-time
Application deadline: 4 October, 2024
More about the role: https://bit.ly/3zpnQzX#directorofprograms #Werehiring #jobs #scholarlypublishing #hiringnow
-
Tell us what you think!
Our community survey is live:
https://surveymonkey.com/r/DOAJconsultation
Share your opinions about our journal metadata, our policy of which journals we index, the DOAJ Seal, and more.
Please share this post and the survey widely in your networks. Thank you!
#openaccess #scholcomm #academicchatter #scholarlypublishing #scholarlycomms
-
▶️ The #DOAJat20 September 28th DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals "Global" recording is here!
The webinar was moderated by Ivonne Lujano and consisted of eight lightning talks with speakers Saurabh Khanna from PKP along with Josie Caplehorne, Gimena del Rio Riande, Ikhwan Arief, Susan Murray, Abel L. Packer, Gu Liping and Vrushali Dandawate.
Check out the whole event on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRjtc-7tg8w&t=1s
#OpenAccess #AcademicChatter #ScholarlyPublishing #GlobalPublishing
-
Our second speaker, Josie Caplehorne reminds us that Open Access doesn't necessarily mean open and accessible to everyone.
-
The second event, Global, celebrating #DOAJat20 has been opened by Tom Olyhoek, Head of Outreach at DOAJ, and is moderated by Ivonne Lujano.
Our first speaker is Saurabh Khanna, focussing on PKP, discussing the steps to be taken to decolonize #scholarlypublishing #openaccess
-
Reminder! Want to catch tomorrow's #DOAJat20 event @DOAJ? It starts at 9 AM EST.
Join PKP Research Associate Saurabh Khanna alongside an impactful international group of speakers to discuss open access!
Not to be missed, you can register all the way up until the webinar starts:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_fu42oi59S7GZ366rjyAUGg#/registrationHappy 20 years to DOAJ!
#OpenAccess #ScholComm #AcademicChatter #AcademicPublishing #ScholarlyPublishing #Interoperability #researchers #librarians #universitypress
-
Registrations are now open for DOAJ at 20: Global – the second event celebrating #DOAJat20.
The event will take place online on 28th September, 13.00-15.00 UTC. It includes lightning talks from speakers worldwide on the obstacles, challenges, opportunities and successes that #openaccess brings globally. Our DOAJ Ambassador, Ivonne Lujano will be moderating a range of inspiring and thought-provoking speakers.
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_fu42oi59S7GZ366rjyAUGg#/registration
-
🤔 Are you closely following our content? If you do, you have noticed #EOSCFuture, #DiSSCo, #Ecostack, ParAqua #COSTAction & many other #scientific #projects increasingly #publishing various outputs in their own collections at #RIOJournal. Check out what makes our publishing solution so unique & valued:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6W32P_sVGc&ab_channel=PensoftPublishers
#openscience #openresearch #scholarlypublishing #journals #euprojects #horizoneurope #horizoneu