home.social

#hegel — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #hegel, aggregated by home.social.

  1. In the Age of #Philosophy.

    We urgently need philosophy. The world has changed so radically—and will continue to do so—that traditional ways of thinking are no longer sufficient. From the billions of people deprived of their homelands to machines that act autonomously, we face challenges that we absolutely must solve and that cannot be grasped using our old categories. What does consciousness mean in a world of AI systems? What is life? What is #freedom, and so on? The classical thinking of the European #Enlightenment, which has dominated the world for the past few centuries, is no longer tenable for many reasons and offers no insights. Our understanding of the world must be transformed into a new form of thinking, or we will begin to embrace chaos. Which is what I am doing. Perhaps this is already a first step. #chaos #kant #hegel #nietzsche #thinking #litrature #future #anon #anonymous

    word.undead-network.de/2026/09

  2. Право, old
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/346

    Право, law
    +римское право
    #Право, #law
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/345

    Статистика
    statistics
    #Статистика
    #statistics
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/343

    Песни и стихи
    Пісні та вірші, Songs and poems
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/342

    Бердяев
    Бердяєв, Berdyaev
    #Бердяев
    #Бердяєв, #Berdyaev
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/341

    Theology, philosophy and the history of ideas
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/340

    _философия 7112
    _philosophy, _філософія
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/334

    Статьи, доклады, тезисы по философским наукам 9463
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/333

    _Русская философия
    _Російська філософія, _Russian philosophy
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/332

    Хайдеггер и Гёльдерлин
    Heidegger und Hölderlin, Хайдеггер та Гельдерлін
    #Хайдеггер и #Гёльдерлин
    #Heidegger und #Hölderlin, #Хайдеггер та #Гельдерлін
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/331

    _Ницше, Ніцше, Nietzsche
    #Ницше, #Ніцше, #Nietzsche
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/330

    _немецкие коммунаци
    German communazi, німецькі комунаці
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/329

    Иммануил Кант
    Іммануїл кант, Immanuel Kant
    #ИммануилКант
    #Іммануїл Кант, #Immanuel Kant
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/328

    _Гегель, Hegel
    #Гегель, #Hegel
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/327

    _Немецкая философия
    Німецька філософія, Deutsche Philosophie
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/326

    китайская философия
    Chinese philosophy, китайська філософія
    #китайскаяфилософия
    #Chinese philosophy, #китайська філософія
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/325

    _История философии
    Історія філософії, History of philosophy
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/324

    _Античная философия
    ancient philosophy, Антична філософія, antique
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/323

    cognition books, теория познания, епістемологія, эпистемология, epistemology, теорія пізнання
    #cognition books, #теорияпознания, #епістемологія, #эпистемология, #epistemology, #теоріяпізнання
    t.me/scilib_yura15cbx/317

  3. "Religion, right, ethics, and everything spiritual in human beings, is merely aroused. We are implicitly spirit, for the truth lies within us and the spiritual content within us must be brought into consciousness."

    Hegel, Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: The Lectures of 1827, p. 161

    #Hegel #Recollection #Anamnesis #Philosophy #Religion #Ethics #Spirit #Consciousness #Mysticism #GermanIdealism

  4. Call for papers: #Metaphilosophy in History

    Guest editors: Catherine Dromelet and Willem Lemmens (both University of Antwerp)

    What is #philosophy? How does a philosopher proceed and what goals do they pursue? How do they distinguish between good and bad philosophy? Being interested in such questions is sometimes labeled as metaphilosophy. Recent publications on metaphilosophy are essential references when it comes to these questions. The prevailing tendency in these and related contributions is to address methodological and systematic problems relevant in contemporary discourses, while the historical context of metaphilosophical issues is typically ignored (with few exceptions showing, for instance, historical affinities within the Marxist tradition). The present issue aims to address this hiatus. The meaning of the word ‘philosophy’ has undergone profound transformations over time. What we consider ‘modern science’, for instance, emerged in early modern times within the bounds of what was then considered ‘philosophy’. Similarly, ‘experimental philosophy’ had a specific meaning in the early modern period: it came close to what we would call ‘empirical science’, but today the latter means largely an empirical survey of conceptual intuitions, while the former has now a very different meaning for several contemporary philosophers. These are just conspicuous illustrations of how the meaning of the word ‘philosophy’ has been changing over time. The special issue ‘Metaphilosophy in History’ aims at surveying the most significant changes in the self-conception of philosophy and at introducing historical insights and considerations into contemporary discourses on metaphilosophy. It provides an opportunity to focus on specific authors and schools of thought, to highlight distinctive aspects and phases in the evolution of the self-understanding of philosophy. So, while much of metaphilosophical work so far has been concerned with systematic issues, our aim is (1) to provide a historical perspective on metaphilosophical enterprises through a reconstruction of the self-conception of philosophy up to the very recent past, and (2) to infuse contemporary problems of metaphilosophy with historical consciousness and sensitivity.

    For this special issue of History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis we are looking for articles (up to 10.000 words) that seek to provide a new, diversified outlook on historically informed metaphilosophy, based on in-depth original research. The questions that we are interested in include: Did metaphilosophy play any important role in the past philosophers' agenda? If they held metaphilosophical views, did their philosophical practice follow them? Was there more agreement on the metaphilosophical level than in the argumentative practice, or vice versa? Papers should focus on specific historical figures, presenting their case as illustrative of a more general tendency or movement. This is less pressing in the case of very central figures like #Aristotle, #Hegel, #Wittgenstein, etc., but it is desirable in the case of less influential authors.

    Submission deadline:
    The articles will appear in HPLA 27.1 (2024)

    Articles should be submitted by September 30, 2023, via Editorial Manager (see brill.com/view/journals/hpla/h)

    Please direct any questions to the guest editors at

    catherine (dot) dromelet (at) uantwerpen (dot) be
    willem (dot) lemmens (at) uantwerpen (dot) be

    If you are unsure whether your contribution might fit, send an abstract (500-1000 words) before April 15, 2023 to the guest editors and we will get back to you by May 31, 2023.

    @philosophy