#inclusivelanguage — Public Fediverse posts

Day 6 of the LGBTQ alphabet series: I is for Intersex.

There is a lot of confusion about the term Intersex and Intersex people. In short, Intersex refers to people who are born with sex characteristics (chromosomes, sex organs, etc.) that do not fit the traditional binary, male/female, norms.

To be honest, I am still learning about Intersex and Intersex people, so if you are reading this article and want to learn more then you may want to check out the longer version of this article on Substack.

It should be noted that while older medical references often used the term 'hermaphrodite,' today that term is considered scientifically inaccurate and deeply stigmatizing. The correct, respectful, and universally accepted term is intersex.

#LGBTQAlphaSeries #IntersexAwareness #InclusiveLanguage #LGBTQ #QueerHistory #LearnWithMe

Substack URL: https://substack.com/home/post/p-200929879

Day 6 of the LGBTQ alphabet series: I is for Intersex.

There is a lot of confusion about the term Intersex and Intersex people. In short, Intersex refers to people who are born with sex characteristics (chromosomes, sex organs, etc.) that do not fit the traditional binary, male/female, norms.

To be honest, I am still learning about Intersex and Intersex people, so if you are reading this article and want to learn more then you may want to check out the longer version of this article on Substack.

It should be noted that while older medical references often used the term 'hermaphrodite,' today that term is considered scientifically inaccurate and deeply stigmatizing. The correct, respectful, and universally accepted term is intersex.

#LGBTQAlphaSeries #IntersexAwareness #InclusiveLanguage #LGBTQ #QueerHistory #LearnWithMe

Substack URL: https://substack.com/home/post/p-200929879

Day 6 of the LGBTQ alphabet series: I is for Intersex.

There is a lot of confusion about the term Intersex and Intersex people. In short, Intersex refers to people who are born with sex characteristics (chromosomes, sex organs, etc.) that do not fit the traditional binary, male/female, norms.

To be honest, I am still learning about Intersex and Intersex people, so if you are reading this article and want to learn more then you may want to check out the longer version of this article on Substack.

It should be noted that while older medical references often used the term 'hermaphrodite,' today that term is considered scientifically inaccurate and deeply stigmatizing. The correct, respectful, and universally accepted term is intersex.

#LGBTQAlphaSeries #IntersexAwareness #InclusiveLanguage #LGBTQ #QueerHistory #LearnWithMe

Substack URL: https://substack.com/home/post/p-200929879

Day 6 of the LGBTQ alphabet series: I is for Intersex.

There is a lot of confusion about the term Intersex and Intersex people. In short, Intersex refers to people who are born with sex characteristics (chromosomes, sex organs, etc.) that do not fit the traditional binary, male/female, norms.

To be honest, I am still learning about Intersex and Intersex people, so if you are reading this article and want to learn more then you may want to check out the longer version of this article on Substack.

It should be noted that while older medical references often used the term 'hermaphrodite,' today that term is considered scientifically inaccurate and deeply stigmatizing. The correct, respectful, and universally accepted term is intersex.

#LGBTQAlphaSeries #IntersexAwareness #InclusiveLanguage #LGBTQ #QueerHistory #LearnWithMe

Substack URL: https://substack.com/home/post/p-200929879

Day 6 of the LGBTQ alphabet series: I is for Intersex.

There is a lot of confusion about the term Intersex and Intersex people. In short, Intersex refers to people who are born with sex characteristics (chromosomes, sex organs, etc.) that do not fit the traditional binary, male/female, norms.

To be honest, I am still learning about Intersex and Intersex people, so if you are reading this article and want to learn more then you may want to check out the longer version of this article on Substack.

It should be noted that while older medical references often used the term 'hermaphrodite,' today that term is considered scientifically inaccurate and deeply stigmatizing. The correct, respectful, and universally accepted term is intersex.

#LGBTQAlphaSeries #IntersexAwareness #InclusiveLanguage #LGBTQ #QueerHistory #LearnWithMe

Substack URL: https://substack.com/home/post/p-200929879

I'm sending out a newsletter on Monday chock full of really cool opportunities to learn and have fun as a writer (both free and paid); care to sign up? I send one every other month and always include a corgi photo :) https://process-and-product.beehiiv.com/subscribe

@edibuddies, @writers, #Writing, #Editing, #WritingAdvice, #WritingCraft, #QueerWriters, #Romancelandia, #FictionWriting, #SelfPublishing, #InclusiveLanguage, #ConsciousLanguage

I'm sending out a newsletter on Monday chock full of really cool opportunities to learn and have fun as a writer (both free and paid); care to sign up? I send one every other month and always include a corgi photo :) https://process-and-product.beehiiv.com/subscribe

@edibuddies, @writers, #Writing, #Editing, #WritingAdvice, #WritingCraft, #QueerWriters, #Romancelandia, #FictionWriting, #SelfPublishing, #InclusiveLanguage, #ConsciousLanguage

Please stop using "Bipolar" as an adjective.

Have you ever heard someone say, "Watch out for him today, he's being so bipolar" or "My boss is being so bipolar" or even "I can't decide which shoes to buy, I'm being so bipolar about it"?

While it might seem like a harmless figure of speech, it is actually a form of casual ableism.

Here is why:

1) It trivializes a disability. Bipolar disorder isn't just "changing your mind" or "being moody." While everyone experiences ups and downs, Bipolar disorder involves physiological shifts in energy, sleep, and judgment that are often beyond a person’s control. It is a complex mental health condition involving intense manic and depressive episodes that can impact every aspect of a person’s life.

A manic episode is not just "being happy." It can involve a dangerous loss of touch with reality, racing thoughts, and physical exhaustion. A depressive episode is not just "being sad." It is a debilitating clinical state that can make basic survival feel impossible. When we use the word casually, we erase the immense effort it takes for folks to manage these extremes.

2) It reinforces stigma. Using the diagnosis to describe something "unpredictable" or "annoying" suggests that people with the condition are inherently difficult, "crazy," or erratic. The stereotype forces many people into silence.

The truth is, you likely know someone with bipolar disorder, like a colleague who never misses a deadline, a friend who is a pillar of support, or a family member who is incredibly high-functioning. Because of the way the word is thrown around as an insult, they often have to hide their diagnosis to avoid being judged by tropes you’re using. When you use the word casually, you are telling those people that you view their identity as a negative trait.

3) It erases the reality. When "bipolar" is used as a joke, it creates an environment where people living with the condition feel they can’t be honest about their struggles. If the word is always associated with being "dramatic" or "moody" in your social circle, a person experiencing a genuine crisis will likely stay silent to avoid being seen as a stereotype. It turns a medical necessity into a social risk. When we stop using the word as a punchline, we open the door for real, life-saving conversations. Language is the environment we live in. When we use clinical terms as insults, we make the environment toxic for the people who actually need those terms to describe their lives.

If you learned something new from this post or would like to help spread awareness, please share it. We should work together to make our language more inclusive. Have you ever experienced this kind of ableist language in your daily life? Whether you’ve been the one hearing it or the one who realized they needed to change their vocabulary, I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Image: From Gerd-Altmann/Pixabay

#LanguageMatters #EndTheStigma #BreakTheStigma #CasualAbleism #BipolarAwareness #MentalHealthMatters #MentalHealthAwareness #Ableism #InclusiveLanguage #SelfCare #Psychology #BipolarDisorder #Bipolar #VisibleNonApparent #Neurodiversity

Please stop using "Bipolar" as an adjective.

Have you ever heard someone say, "Watch out for him today, he's being so bipolar" or "My boss is being so bipolar" or even "I can't decide which shoes to buy, I'm being so bipolar about it"?

While it might seem like a harmless figure of speech, it is actually a form of casual ableism.

Here is why:

1) It trivializes a disability. Bipolar disorder isn't just "changing your mind" or "being moody." While everyone experiences ups and downs, Bipolar disorder involves physiological shifts in energy, sleep, and judgment that are often beyond a person’s control. It is a complex mental health condition involving intense manic and depressive episodes that can impact every aspect of a person’s life.

A manic episode is not just "being happy." It can involve a dangerous loss of touch with reality, racing thoughts, and physical exhaustion. A depressive episode is not just "being sad." It is a debilitating clinical state that can make basic survival feel impossible. When we use the word casually, we erase the immense effort it takes for folks to manage these extremes.

2) It reinforces stigma. Using the diagnosis to describe something "unpredictable" or "annoying" suggests that people with the condition are inherently difficult, "crazy," or erratic. The stereotype forces many people into silence.

The truth is, you likely know someone with bipolar disorder, like a colleague who never misses a deadline, a friend who is a pillar of support, or a family member who is incredibly high-functioning. Because of the way the word is thrown around as an insult, they often have to hide their diagnosis to avoid being judged by tropes you’re using. When you use the word casually, you are telling those people that you view their identity as a negative trait.

3) It erases the reality. When "bipolar" is used as a joke, it creates an environment where people living with the condition feel they can’t be honest about their struggles. If the word is always associated with being "dramatic" or "moody" in your social circle, a person experiencing a genuine crisis will likely stay silent to avoid being seen as a stereotype. It turns a medical necessity into a social risk. When we stop using the word as a punchline, we open the door for real, life-saving conversations. Language is the environment we live in. When we use clinical terms as insults, we make the environment toxic for the people who actually need those terms to describe their lives.

If you learned something new from this post or would like to help spread awareness, please share it. We should work together to make our language more inclusive. Have you ever experienced this kind of ableist language in your daily life? Whether you’ve been the one hearing it or the one who realized they needed to change their vocabulary, I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Image: From Gerd-Altmann/Pixabay

#LanguageMatters #EndTheStigma #BreakTheStigma #CasualAbleism #BipolarAwareness #MentalHealthMatters #MentalHealthAwareness #Ableism #InclusiveLanguage #SelfCare #Psychology #BipolarDisorder #Bipolar #VisibleNonApparent #Neurodiversity

Warning, very long post ahead.

I’m Aaron John Dizon, the person Howie Severino mentioned in his recent essay. He used my feedback on ableist language to explore a broader point, and while I welcome the conversation, it missed the deeper message of my advocacy.

Let me start by saying this straight:
I’M BLIND, AND I’M PROUD OF IT.
Being blind doesn’t mean I’m lost, stupid, or incapable of thinking for myself. So, when people use “blind” as a negative word, like “blind faith” or “blind obedience”, it hits differently. It’s not just a figure of speech. It’s a reflection of how society still connects blindness to ignorance.
Now, to be clear, I am not against the word blind. I am not trying to avoid it. In fact, it’s the exact opposite. I embrace it. I use it. I introduce myself as blind with pride. Even to my own three-year-old son, who might not yet understand what blindness fully means, I make it clear: Mama and Dada are blind. And he gets it — he knows we don’t see like most people do, but he also knows that doesn’t make us less. We move, we love, and we live fully. That’s the kind of understanding I want to grow in him, that blindness is not a curse, not a defect, not something to be pitied. It’s just a part of who we are, and we’re proud of it. I love the word because it’s part of who I am, and it represents my strength, my independence, and my truth.
What I don’t accept is when people use blind to mean something negative, when it’s used to describe people who refuse to think, who follow without question, who ignore what’s wrong. That’s not what being blind means. So, when someone says “it’s just a metaphor,” that’s where I draw the line.

In that essay, Howie quoted Aleeia saying:
“Before people react or feel hurt, they should first look at where the word comes from, what it really means, and what the speaker’s intent was. Words don’t always have the same meaning depending on the situation.”
And honestly, this is exactly the problem. That kind of statement blames the people who speak up, as if we’re too emotional, too sensitive, or too quick to be offended. It puts the focus on intent instead of impact. But intent doesn’t erase harm. You don’t get to say, “I didn’t mean it that way,” and expect that to fix the hurt. Because the truth is, when you use “blind” to describe people who don’t think or who lack awareness, you’re still reinforcing the same old idea that blindness equals ignorance. And that’s not something you can explain away with “context.”
Then she said:
“For me, hearing the word ‘blind’ in this context isn’t offensive at all. Just because a word is used doesn’t automatically mean it’s discrimination or an insult. Some people get offended right away when they hear ‘blind,’ but I think that reaction often comes from misunderstanding the context. In my case, I don’t feel insulted when someone calls me blind, because it’s simply the truth. I am blind. It’s a fact, not a negative label. And I don’t treat my blindness as a problem I need to get rid of or a weakness I have to fix.”
See, this is where it completely contradicts itself. If you say you’re proud of being blind, good, so am I. but how can you defend people using our word to describe ignorance or lack of awareness? That’s not pride; that’s permission. That’s letting others twist something we live and breathe into an insult.
True pride means defending the dignity of your identity. It means saying, “Yes, I am blind, but don’t use that word to describe what’s wrong with the world.”

Howie also wrote that he “won’t promise to stop using those expressions,” but will “try to be more thoughtful.” If you truly believe in inclusivity, you don’t try, you do better. You listen, you learn, and you stop using words that reinforce discrimination, even unintentionally.
Let’s be clear: Howie didn’t frame this as a nuanced discussion. Instead, he used Aleeia’s comfort with the word ‘blind’ to counter my advocacy, which shifted the focus from a systemic critique to a personal debate. My lived experience and call for dignity became the “issue to be balanced,” rather than the perspective that needed attention.
This is not nuance, this is a shortcut in reporting that overlooked the full context. One blind person’s personal reaction does not invalidate a systemic critique about language and representation. Using a single perspective to soften another’s lived reality does not advance understanding, it obscures it.
True journalistic responsibility would mean engaging with the advocacy at its core, not reframing it as a matter of opinion to be “balanced.” My feedback, the voice of someone directly confronting discrimination, deserves recognition, not sidelining.
And this, this is what’s wrong with how media in the Philippines has shaped public thinking for so long. We’ve been portrayed as pitiful, helpless, or inspirational objects, never as equals.
Kaya ngayon, kapag may bulag na nagsalita tungkol sa respeto at dignidad, ang dali nating sabihan ng “Uy, ang liit lang naman na issue,” or “bakit sobra kang galit?”
But no, this is not a small issue. This is exactly how discrimination survives through words, habits, and the excuses we keep making for them.
If you truly advocate for inclusivity, then you won’t defend a language that treats blindness like a defect or an insult. You’ll listen. You’ll rethink. You’ll open your eyes, ironically, that’s what real awareness means.
This isn’t about being sensitive. This is about being seen and respected, not as metaphors, but as people.

And to you, Aleeia, who is blind and supposedly understands the weight of our struggles, shame on you for defending those who use our identity as their shortcut to insult or ignorance. You, of all people, should know how it feels to live every day in a world that already misrepresents us, and yet here you are, siding with the very thinking that keeps us there. That’s not understanding. That’s betrayal. You didn’t just miss the point, you helped prove why this advocacy is needed in the first place. Because if even one of us, a blind person, can justify this kind of language, then the problem runs deeper than ignorance, it’s internalized shame. And that’s something we need to unlearn, not defend.
So yes, I’ll keep standing by what I said.
I’M BLIND, AND I’M PROUD OF IT.
But I’ll never stay silent when people, even those who share our blindness, allow the world to keep treating our word as something shameful.
— Aaron John Dizon

#Blind #ProudlyBlind #LanguageMatters #MediaResponsibility #Ableism #InclusiveLanguage #InclusionMatters #Bulag #SayTheWord #DisabilityPH #Philippines

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17Ywx2BmQq/?mibextid=wwXIfr

https://www.gmanetwork.com/regionaltv/features/110728/essay-an-eye-opening-provocation-from-a-reader/story/#google_vignette/

Warning, very long post ahead.

I’m Aaron John Dizon, the person Howie Severino mentioned in his recent essay. He used my feedback on ableist language to explore a broader point, and while I welcome the conversation, it missed the deeper message of my advocacy.

Let me start by saying this straight:
I’M BLIND, AND I’M PROUD OF IT.
Being blind doesn’t mean I’m lost, stupid, or incapable of thinking for myself. So, when people use “blind” as a negative word, like “blind faith” or “blind obedience”, it hits differently. It’s not just a figure of speech. It’s a reflection of how society still connects blindness to ignorance.
Now, to be clear, I am not against the word blind. I am not trying to avoid it. In fact, it’s the exact opposite. I embrace it. I use it. I introduce myself as blind with pride. Even to my own three-year-old son, who might not yet understand what blindness fully means, I make it clear: Mama and Dada are blind. And he gets it — he knows we don’t see like most people do, but he also knows that doesn’t make us less. We move, we love, and we live fully. That’s the kind of understanding I want to grow in him, that blindness is not a curse, not a defect, not something to be pitied. It’s just a part of who we are, and we’re proud of it. I love the word because it’s part of who I am, and it represents my strength, my independence, and my truth.
What I don’t accept is when people use blind to mean something negative, when it’s used to describe people who refuse to think, who follow without question, who ignore what’s wrong. That’s not what being blind means. So, when someone says “it’s just a metaphor,” that’s where I draw the line.

In that essay, Howie quoted Aleeia saying:
“Before people react or feel hurt, they should first look at where the word comes from, what it really means, and what the speaker’s intent was. Words don’t always have the same meaning depending on the situation.”
And honestly, this is exactly the problem. That kind of statement blames the people who speak up, as if we’re too emotional, too sensitive, or too quick to be offended. It puts the focus on intent instead of impact. But intent doesn’t erase harm. You don’t get to say, “I didn’t mean it that way,” and expect that to fix the hurt. Because the truth is, when you use “blind” to describe people who don’t think or who lack awareness, you’re still reinforcing the same old idea that blindness equals ignorance. And that’s not something you can explain away with “context.”
Then she said:
“For me, hearing the word ‘blind’ in this context isn’t offensive at all. Just because a word is used doesn’t automatically mean it’s discrimination or an insult. Some people get offended right away when they hear ‘blind,’ but I think that reaction often comes from misunderstanding the context. In my case, I don’t feel insulted when someone calls me blind, because it’s simply the truth. I am blind. It’s a fact, not a negative label. And I don’t treat my blindness as a problem I need to get rid of or a weakness I have to fix.”
See, this is where it completely contradicts itself. If you say you’re proud of being blind, good, so am I. but how can you defend people using our word to describe ignorance or lack of awareness? That’s not pride; that’s permission. That’s letting others twist something we live and breathe into an insult.
True pride means defending the dignity of your identity. It means saying, “Yes, I am blind, but don’t use that word to describe what’s wrong with the world.”

Howie also wrote that he “won’t promise to stop using those expressions,” but will “try to be more thoughtful.” If you truly believe in inclusivity, you don’t try, you do better. You listen, you learn, and you stop using words that reinforce discrimination, even unintentionally.
Let’s be clear: Howie didn’t frame this as a nuanced discussion. Instead, he used Aleeia’s comfort with the word ‘blind’ to counter my advocacy, which shifted the focus from a systemic critique to a personal debate. My lived experience and call for dignity became the “issue to be balanced,” rather than the perspective that needed attention.
This is not nuance, this is a shortcut in reporting that overlooked the full context. One blind person’s personal reaction does not invalidate a systemic critique about language and representation. Using a single perspective to soften another’s lived reality does not advance understanding, it obscures it.
True journalistic responsibility would mean engaging with the advocacy at its core, not reframing it as a matter of opinion to be “balanced.” My feedback, the voice of someone directly confronting discrimination, deserves recognition, not sidelining.
And this, this is what’s wrong with how media in the Philippines has shaped public thinking for so long. We’ve been portrayed as pitiful, helpless, or inspirational objects, never as equals.
Kaya ngayon, kapag may bulag na nagsalita tungkol sa respeto at dignidad, ang dali nating sabihan ng “Uy, ang liit lang naman na issue,” or “bakit sobra kang galit?”
But no, this is not a small issue. This is exactly how discrimination survives through words, habits, and the excuses we keep making for them.
If you truly advocate for inclusivity, then you won’t defend a language that treats blindness like a defect or an insult. You’ll listen. You’ll rethink. You’ll open your eyes, ironically, that’s what real awareness means.
This isn’t about being sensitive. This is about being seen and respected, not as metaphors, but as people.

And to you, Aleeia, who is blind and supposedly understands the weight of our struggles, shame on you for defending those who use our identity as their shortcut to insult or ignorance. You, of all people, should know how it feels to live every day in a world that already misrepresents us, and yet here you are, siding with the very thinking that keeps us there. That’s not understanding. That’s betrayal. You didn’t just miss the point, you helped prove why this advocacy is needed in the first place. Because if even one of us, a blind person, can justify this kind of language, then the problem runs deeper than ignorance, it’s internalized shame. And that’s something we need to unlearn, not defend.
So yes, I’ll keep standing by what I said.
I’M BLIND, AND I’M PROUD OF IT.
But I’ll never stay silent when people, even those who share our blindness, allow the world to keep treating our word as something shameful.
— Aaron John Dizon

#Blind #ProudlyBlind #LanguageMatters #MediaResponsibility #Ableism #InclusiveLanguage #InclusionMatters #Bulag #SayTheWord #DisabilityPH #Philippines

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17Ywx2BmQq/?mibextid=wwXIfr

https://www.gmanetwork.com/regionaltv/features/110728/essay-an-eye-opening-provocation-from-a-reader/story/#google_vignette/

Warning, very long post ahead.

I’m Aaron John Dizon, the person Howie Severino mentioned in his recent essay. He used my feedback on ableist language to explore a broader point, and while I welcome the conversation, it missed the deeper message of my advocacy.

Let me start by saying this straight:
I’M BLIND, AND I’M PROUD OF IT.
Being blind doesn’t mean I’m lost, stupid, or incapable of thinking for myself. So, when people use “blind” as a negative word, like “blind faith” or “blind obedience”, it hits differently. It’s not just a figure of speech. It’s a reflection of how society still connects blindness to ignorance.
Now, to be clear, I am not against the word blind. I am not trying to avoid it. In fact, it’s the exact opposite. I embrace it. I use it. I introduce myself as blind with pride. Even to my own three-year-old son, who might not yet understand what blindness fully means, I make it clear: Mama and Dada are blind. And he gets it — he knows we don’t see like most people do, but he also knows that doesn’t make us less. We move, we love, and we live fully. That’s the kind of understanding I want to grow in him, that blindness is not a curse, not a defect, not something to be pitied. It’s just a part of who we are, and we’re proud of it. I love the word because it’s part of who I am, and it represents my strength, my independence, and my truth.
What I don’t accept is when people use blind to mean something negative, when it’s used to describe people who refuse to think, who follow without question, who ignore what’s wrong. That’s not what being blind means. So, when someone says “it’s just a metaphor,” that’s where I draw the line.

In that essay, Howie quoted Aleeia saying:
“Before people react or feel hurt, they should first look at where the word comes from, what it really means, and what the speaker’s intent was. Words don’t always have the same meaning depending on the situation.”
And honestly, this is exactly the problem. That kind of statement blames the people who speak up, as if we’re too emotional, too sensitive, or too quick to be offended. It puts the focus on intent instead of impact. But intent doesn’t erase harm. You don’t get to say, “I didn’t mean it that way,” and expect that to fix the hurt. Because the truth is, when you use “blind” to describe people who don’t think or who lack awareness, you’re still reinforcing the same old idea that blindness equals ignorance. And that’s not something you can explain away with “context.”
Then she said:
“For me, hearing the word ‘blind’ in this context isn’t offensive at all. Just because a word is used doesn’t automatically mean it’s discrimination or an insult. Some people get offended right away when they hear ‘blind,’ but I think that reaction often comes from misunderstanding the context. In my case, I don’t feel insulted when someone calls me blind, because it’s simply the truth. I am blind. It’s a fact, not a negative label. And I don’t treat my blindness as a problem I need to get rid of or a weakness I have to fix.”
See, this is where it completely contradicts itself. If you say you’re proud of being blind, good, so am I. but how can you defend people using our word to describe ignorance or lack of awareness? That’s not pride; that’s permission. That’s letting others twist something we live and breathe into an insult.
True pride means defending the dignity of your identity. It means saying, “Yes, I am blind, but don’t use that word to describe what’s wrong with the world.”

Howie also wrote that he “won’t promise to stop using those expressions,” but will “try to be more thoughtful.” If you truly believe in inclusivity, you don’t try, you do better. You listen, you learn, and you stop using words that reinforce discrimination, even unintentionally.
Let’s be clear: Howie didn’t frame this as a nuanced discussion. Instead, he used Aleeia’s comfort with the word ‘blind’ to counter my advocacy, which shifted the focus from a systemic critique to a personal debate. My lived experience and call for dignity became the “issue to be balanced,” rather than the perspective that needed attention.
This is not nuance, this is a shortcut in reporting that overlooked the full context. One blind person’s personal reaction does not invalidate a systemic critique about language and representation. Using a single perspective to soften another’s lived reality does not advance understanding, it obscures it.
True journalistic responsibility would mean engaging with the advocacy at its core, not reframing it as a matter of opinion to be “balanced.” My feedback, the voice of someone directly confronting discrimination, deserves recognition, not sidelining.
And this, this is what’s wrong with how media in the Philippines has shaped public thinking for so long. We’ve been portrayed as pitiful, helpless, or inspirational objects, never as equals.
Kaya ngayon, kapag may bulag na nagsalita tungkol sa respeto at dignidad, ang dali nating sabihan ng “Uy, ang liit lang naman na issue,” or “bakit sobra kang galit?”
But no, this is not a small issue. This is exactly how discrimination survives through words, habits, and the excuses we keep making for them.
If you truly advocate for inclusivity, then you won’t defend a language that treats blindness like a defect or an insult. You’ll listen. You’ll rethink. You’ll open your eyes, ironically, that’s what real awareness means.
This isn’t about being sensitive. This is about being seen and respected, not as metaphors, but as people.

And to you, Aleeia, who is blind and supposedly understands the weight of our struggles, shame on you for defending those who use our identity as their shortcut to insult or ignorance. You, of all people, should know how it feels to live every day in a world that already misrepresents us, and yet here you are, siding with the very thinking that keeps us there. That’s not understanding. That’s betrayal. You didn’t just miss the point, you helped prove why this advocacy is needed in the first place. Because if even one of us, a blind person, can justify this kind of language, then the problem runs deeper than ignorance, it’s internalized shame. And that’s something we need to unlearn, not defend.
So yes, I’ll keep standing by what I said.
I’M BLIND, AND I’M PROUD OF IT.
But I’ll never stay silent when people, even those who share our blindness, allow the world to keep treating our word as something shameful.
— Aaron John Dizon

#Blind #ProudlyBlind #LanguageMatters #MediaResponsibility #Ableism #InclusiveLanguage #InclusionMatters #Bulag #SayTheWord #DisabilityPH #Philippines

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17Ywx2BmQq/?mibextid=wwXIfr

https://www.gmanetwork.com/regionaltv/features/110728/essay-an-eye-opening-provocation-from-a-reader/story/#google_vignette/

Warning, very long post ahead.

I’m Aaron John Dizon, the person Howie Severino mentioned in his recent essay. He used my feedback on ableist language to explore a broader point, and while I welcome the conversation, it missed the deeper message of my advocacy.

Let me start by saying this straight:
I’M BLIND, AND I’M PROUD OF IT.
Being blind doesn’t mean I’m lost, stupid, or incapable of thinking for myself. So, when people use “blind” as a negative word, like “blind faith” or “blind obedience”, it hits differently. It’s not just a figure of speech. It’s a reflection of how society still connects blindness to ignorance.
Now, to be clear, I am not against the word blind. I am not trying to avoid it. In fact, it’s the exact opposite. I embrace it. I use it. I introduce myself as blind with pride. Even to my own three-year-old son, who might not yet understand what blindness fully means, I make it clear: Mama and Dada are blind. And he gets it — he knows we don’t see like most people do, but he also knows that doesn’t make us less. We move, we love, and we live fully. That’s the kind of understanding I want to grow in him, that blindness is not a curse, not a defect, not something to be pitied. It’s just a part of who we are, and we’re proud of it. I love the word because it’s part of who I am, and it represents my strength, my independence, and my truth.
What I don’t accept is when people use blind to mean something negative, when it’s used to describe people who refuse to think, who follow without question, who ignore what’s wrong. That’s not what being blind means. So, when someone says “it’s just a metaphor,” that’s where I draw the line.

In that essay, Howie quoted Aleeia saying:
“Before people react or feel hurt, they should first look at where the word comes from, what it really means, and what the speaker’s intent was. Words don’t always have the same meaning depending on the situation.”
And honestly, this is exactly the problem. That kind of statement blames the people who speak up, as if we’re too emotional, too sensitive, or too quick to be offended. It puts the focus on intent instead of impact. But intent doesn’t erase harm. You don’t get to say, “I didn’t mean it that way,” and expect that to fix the hurt. Because the truth is, when you use “blind” to describe people who don’t think or who lack awareness, you’re still reinforcing the same old idea that blindness equals ignorance. And that’s not something you can explain away with “context.”
Then she said:
“For me, hearing the word ‘blind’ in this context isn’t offensive at all. Just because a word is used doesn’t automatically mean it’s discrimination or an insult. Some people get offended right away when they hear ‘blind,’ but I think that reaction often comes from misunderstanding the context. In my case, I don’t feel insulted when someone calls me blind, because it’s simply the truth. I am blind. It’s a fact, not a negative label. And I don’t treat my blindness as a problem I need to get rid of or a weakness I have to fix.”
See, this is where it completely contradicts itself. If you say you’re proud of being blind, good, so am I. but how can you defend people using our word to describe ignorance or lack of awareness? That’s not pride; that’s permission. That’s letting others twist something we live and breathe into an insult.
True pride means defending the dignity of your identity. It means saying, “Yes, I am blind, but don’t use that word to describe what’s wrong with the world.”

Howie also wrote that he “won’t promise to stop using those expressions,” but will “try to be more thoughtful.” If you truly believe in inclusivity, you don’t try, you do better. You listen, you learn, and you stop using words that reinforce discrimination, even unintentionally.
Let’s be clear: Howie didn’t frame this as a nuanced discussion. Instead, he used Aleeia’s comfort with the word ‘blind’ to counter my advocacy, which shifted the focus from a systemic critique to a personal debate. My lived experience and call for dignity became the “issue to be balanced,” rather than the perspective that needed attention.
This is not nuance, this is a shortcut in reporting that overlooked the full context. One blind person’s personal reaction does not invalidate a systemic critique about language and representation. Using a single perspective to soften another’s lived reality does not advance understanding, it obscures it.
True journalistic responsibility would mean engaging with the advocacy at its core, not reframing it as a matter of opinion to be “balanced.” My feedback, the voice of someone directly confronting discrimination, deserves recognition, not sidelining.
And this, this is what’s wrong with how media in the Philippines has shaped public thinking for so long. We’ve been portrayed as pitiful, helpless, or inspirational objects, never as equals.
Kaya ngayon, kapag may bulag na nagsalita tungkol sa respeto at dignidad, ang dali nating sabihan ng “Uy, ang liit lang naman na issue,” or “bakit sobra kang galit?”
But no, this is not a small issue. This is exactly how discrimination survives through words, habits, and the excuses we keep making for them.
If you truly advocate for inclusivity, then you won’t defend a language that treats blindness like a defect or an insult. You’ll listen. You’ll rethink. You’ll open your eyes, ironically, that’s what real awareness means.
This isn’t about being sensitive. This is about being seen and respected, not as metaphors, but as people.

And to you, Aleeia, who is blind and supposedly understands the weight of our struggles, shame on you for defending those who use our identity as their shortcut to insult or ignorance. You, of all people, should know how it feels to live every day in a world that already misrepresents us, and yet here you are, siding with the very thinking that keeps us there. That’s not understanding. That’s betrayal. You didn’t just miss the point, you helped prove why this advocacy is needed in the first place. Because if even one of us, a blind person, can justify this kind of language, then the problem runs deeper than ignorance, it’s internalized shame. And that’s something we need to unlearn, not defend.
So yes, I’ll keep standing by what I said.
I’M BLIND, AND I’M PROUD OF IT.
But I’ll never stay silent when people, even those who share our blindness, allow the world to keep treating our word as something shameful.
— Aaron John Dizon

#Blind #ProudlyBlind #LanguageMatters #MediaResponsibility #Ableism #InclusiveLanguage #InclusionMatters #Bulag #SayTheWord #DisabilityPH #Philippines

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17Ywx2BmQq/?mibextid=wwXIfr

https://www.gmanetwork.com/regionaltv/features/110728/essay-an-eye-opening-provocation-from-a-reader/story/#google_vignette/

Warning, very long post ahead.

I’m Aaron John Dizon, the person Howie Severino mentioned in his recent essay. He used my feedback on ableist language to explore a broader point, and while I welcome the conversation, it missed the deeper message of my advocacy.

Let me start by saying this straight:
I’M BLIND, AND I’M PROUD OF IT.
Being blind doesn’t mean I’m lost, stupid, or incapable of thinking for myself. So, when people use “blind” as a negative word, like “blind faith” or “blind obedience”, it hits differently. It’s not just a figure of speech. It’s a reflection of how society still connects blindness to ignorance.
Now, to be clear, I am not against the word blind. I am not trying to avoid it. In fact, it’s the exact opposite. I embrace it. I use it. I introduce myself as blind with pride. Even to my own three-year-old son, who might not yet understand what blindness fully means, I make it clear: Mama and Dada are blind. And he gets it — he knows we don’t see like most people do, but he also knows that doesn’t make us less. We move, we love, and we live fully. That’s the kind of understanding I want to grow in him, that blindness is not a curse, not a defect, not something to be pitied. It’s just a part of who we are, and we’re proud of it. I love the word because it’s part of who I am, and it represents my strength, my independence, and my truth.
What I don’t accept is when people use blind to mean something negative, when it’s used to describe people who refuse to think, who follow without question, who ignore what’s wrong. That’s not what being blind means. So, when someone says “it’s just a metaphor,” that’s where I draw the line.

In that essay, Howie quoted Aleeia saying:
“Before people react or feel hurt, they should first look at where the word comes from, what it really means, and what the speaker’s intent was. Words don’t always have the same meaning depending on the situation.”
And honestly, this is exactly the problem. That kind of statement blames the people who speak up, as if we’re too emotional, too sensitive, or too quick to be offended. It puts the focus on intent instead of impact. But intent doesn’t erase harm. You don’t get to say, “I didn’t mean it that way,” and expect that to fix the hurt. Because the truth is, when you use “blind” to describe people who don’t think or who lack awareness, you’re still reinforcing the same old idea that blindness equals ignorance. And that’s not something you can explain away with “context.”
Then she said:
“For me, hearing the word ‘blind’ in this context isn’t offensive at all. Just because a word is used doesn’t automatically mean it’s discrimination or an insult. Some people get offended right away when they hear ‘blind,’ but I think that reaction often comes from misunderstanding the context. In my case, I don’t feel insulted when someone calls me blind, because it’s simply the truth. I am blind. It’s a fact, not a negative label. And I don’t treat my blindness as a problem I need to get rid of or a weakness I have to fix.”
See, this is where it completely contradicts itself. If you say you’re proud of being blind, good, so am I. but how can you defend people using our word to describe ignorance or lack of awareness? That’s not pride; that’s permission. That’s letting others twist something we live and breathe into an insult.
True pride means defending the dignity of your identity. It means saying, “Yes, I am blind, but don’t use that word to describe what’s wrong with the world.”

Howie also wrote that he “won’t promise to stop using those expressions,” but will “try to be more thoughtful.” If you truly believe in inclusivity, you don’t try, you do better. You listen, you learn, and you stop using words that reinforce discrimination, even unintentionally.
Let’s be clear: Howie didn’t frame this as a nuanced discussion. Instead, he used Aleeia’s comfort with the word ‘blind’ to counter my advocacy, which shifted the focus from a systemic critique to a personal debate. My lived experience and call for dignity became the “issue to be balanced,” rather than the perspective that needed attention.
This is not nuance, this is a shortcut in reporting that overlooked the full context. One blind person’s personal reaction does not invalidate a systemic critique about language and representation. Using a single perspective to soften another’s lived reality does not advance understanding, it obscures it.
True journalistic responsibility would mean engaging with the advocacy at its core, not reframing it as a matter of opinion to be “balanced.” My feedback, the voice of someone directly confronting discrimination, deserves recognition, not sidelining.
And this, this is what’s wrong with how media in the Philippines has shaped public thinking for so long. We’ve been portrayed as pitiful, helpless, or inspirational objects, never as equals.
Kaya ngayon, kapag may bulag na nagsalita tungkol sa respeto at dignidad, ang dali nating sabihan ng “Uy, ang liit lang naman na issue,” or “bakit sobra kang galit?”
But no, this is not a small issue. This is exactly how discrimination survives through words, habits, and the excuses we keep making for them.
If you truly advocate for inclusivity, then you won’t defend a language that treats blindness like a defect or an insult. You’ll listen. You’ll rethink. You’ll open your eyes, ironically, that’s what real awareness means.
This isn’t about being sensitive. This is about being seen and respected, not as metaphors, but as people.

And to you, Aleeia, who is blind and supposedly understands the weight of our struggles, shame on you for defending those who use our identity as their shortcut to insult or ignorance. You, of all people, should know how it feels to live every day in a world that already misrepresents us, and yet here you are, siding with the very thinking that keeps us there. That’s not understanding. That’s betrayal. You didn’t just miss the point, you helped prove why this advocacy is needed in the first place. Because if even one of us, a blind person, can justify this kind of language, then the problem runs deeper than ignorance, it’s internalized shame. And that’s something we need to unlearn, not defend.
So yes, I’ll keep standing by what I said.
I’M BLIND, AND I’M PROUD OF IT.
But I’ll never stay silent when people, even those who share our blindness, allow the world to keep treating our word as something shameful.
— Aaron John Dizon

#Blind #ProudlyBlind #LanguageMatters #MediaResponsibility #Ableism #InclusiveLanguage #InclusionMatters #Bulag #SayTheWord #DisabilityPH #Philippines

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17Ywx2BmQq/?mibextid=wwXIfr

https://www.gmanetwork.com/regionaltv/features/110728/essay-an-eye-opening-provocation-from-a-reader/story/#google_vignette/

Why is using inclusive language so important in the workplace?

In our new strategy-focused blog post, Senior Project Manager Felicity Miners-Jones delves into the need for documentation within the organisation, naturally building inclusivity into tools and workflows, and the power of words and communication.

Read the latest post chock-full of advice, examples, and best practices: https://tetralogical.com/blog/2025/09/09/championing-inclusive-language/

#InclusiveLanguage #Accessibility #SustainableAccessibility

Why is using inclusive language so important in the workplace?

In our new strategy-focused blog post, Senior Project Manager Felicity Miners-Jones delves into the need for documentation within the organisation, naturally building inclusivity into tools and workflows, and the power of words and communication.

Read the latest post chock-full of advice, examples, and best practices: https://tetralogical.com/blog/2025/09/09/championing-inclusive-language/

#InclusiveLanguage #Accessibility #SustainableAccessibility

Do you like writing-related joy, inclusion and self-kindness, fiction, and/or corgis? Subscribe to receive Process & Product every other month! https://process-and-product.beehiiv.com/subscribe

Next one's going out on Wednesday--and I have some cool classes coming up soon!

@edibuddies, @writers, #Writing, #Editing, #WritingAdvice, #WritingCraft, #QueerWriters, #Romancelandia, #FictionWriting, #SelfPublishing, #InclusiveLanguage, #ConsciousLanguage

New newsletter is on its way! Sign up for Process & Product if you like writing-related joy, tips based in values of inclusion and self-kindness, and/or corgis. https://process-and-product.beehiiv.com/subscribe

@edibuddies, @writers, #Writing, #Editing, #WritingAdvice, #WritingCraft, #QueerWriters, #Romancelandia, #FictionWriting, #SelfPublishing, #InclusiveLanguage, #ConsciousLanguage

#ICYMI: The July edition of The #ConsciousLanguage Newsletter includes:
• Why We Shouldn’t Call Trump a “Criminal”
• Stop Saying “Conservative” When You Mean Fascist
• Words Such as Racist Slurs Can Literally Hurt—Here’s the Science

✅ Read and subscribe: https://mail.consciousstyleguide.com/p/conscious-language-newsletter-july-2024

#AmEditing #Copyediting #Copyeditors #WritingCommunity #ConsciousStyleGuide #ConsciousStyle #InclusiveLanguage #ConsciousLanguage #Newsletter

#ICYMI: The July edition of The #ConsciousLanguage Newsletter includes:
• Why We Shouldn’t Call Trump a “Criminal”
• Stop Saying “Conservative” When You Mean Fascist
• Words Such as Racist Slurs Can Literally Hurt—Here’s the Science

✅ Read and subscribe: https://mail.consciousstyleguide.com/p/conscious-language-newsletter-july-2024

#AmEditing #Copyediting #Copyeditors #WritingCommunity #ConsciousStyleGuide #ConsciousStyle #InclusiveLanguage #ConsciousLanguage #Newsletter

#ICYMI: The July edition of The #ConsciousLanguage Newsletter includes:
• Why We Shouldn’t Call Trump a “Criminal”
• Stop Saying “Conservative” When You Mean Fascist
• Words Such as Racist Slurs Can Literally Hurt—Here’s the Science

✅ Read and subscribe: https://mail.consciousstyleguide.com/p/conscious-language-newsletter-july-2024

#AmEditing #Copyediting #Copyeditors #WritingCommunity #ConsciousStyleGuide #ConsciousStyle #InclusiveLanguage #ConsciousLanguage #Newsletter

#ICYMI: The July edition of The #ConsciousLanguage Newsletter includes:
• Why We Shouldn’t Call Trump a “Criminal”
• Stop Saying “Conservative” When You Mean Fascist
• Words Such as Racist Slurs Can Literally Hurt—Here’s the Science

✅ Read and subscribe: https://mail.consciousstyleguide.com/p/conscious-language-newsletter-july-2024

#AmEditing #Copyediting #Copyeditors #WritingCommunity #ConsciousStyleGuide #ConsciousStyle #InclusiveLanguage #ConsciousLanguage #Newsletter

#ICYMI: The July edition of The #ConsciousLanguage Newsletter includes:
• Why We Shouldn’t Call Trump a “Criminal”
• Stop Saying “Conservative” When You Mean Fascist
• Words Such as Racist Slurs Can Literally Hurt—Here’s the Science

✅ Read and subscribe: https://mail.consciousstyleguide.com/p/conscious-language-newsletter-july-2024

#AmEditing #Copyediting #Copyeditors #WritingCommunity #ConsciousStyleGuide #ConsciousStyle #InclusiveLanguage #ConsciousLanguage #Newsletter

What can we do as editors to prevent the harm caused by Islamophobic language? Learn how to help counter hate speech in a Feb. 6 webinar with Amber Riaz. Sign up now: https://webinars.editors.ca/upcoming_webinar/anti-islamophobia-editing-using-inclusive-language-and-plain-language-to-counter-hate-speech/

(Image copyright: megaphone by liravega258 © 123RF.com, laptop/notebook by yupiramos © 123RF.com)

#Editing #EditingAdvice #EditingTips #ProfessionalDevelopment #EditorsCanada #PlainLanguage #InclusiveLanguage

Working on my quarterly newsletter. Sign up if you like inclusive writing & editing resources, romance recs, and/or adorable dogs. I send these so rarely that your inbox won't even mind :)
https://eliotwesteditorial.us8.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=c065cc93920a2bedf05a32ffc&id=0a57bebc9d

#AmWritingRomance #InclusiveLanguage #ConsciousLanguage #RomanceWriters #Romancelandia #AmEditing #Edibuddies #IndieAuthors

Learn about the whys and hows of inclusive language ... on your own time! Topics include race, gender, sexuality, body size, disability, socioeconomic status, religion, age, & more.

This class is for intermediate and beginner inclusive language explorers including fiction and nonfiction writers, communications professionals, editors, and students.

https://heartofthestory.teachable.com/p/inclusive-language-explorations

@edibuddies @writers @romancelandia #Writing #Editing #AmEditing #WritingAdvice #InclusiveLanguage #ConsciousLanguage

Curious about gender and language? Check out "Build Your Gender Diversity Toolbox," a resource roundup originally published through a professional org but now available for free at my website. Lots of good stuff to explore :)

https://www.eliotwesteditorial.com/gender-diversity-resources.html

@edibuddies #edibuddies #editing #InclusiveLanguage
#ConsciousLanguage

The term "enslave" in particular is one that I haven't yet found discussions about what to standardize replacing it with, and there still seem to be plenty of uses of it in the context of VLAN/VXLAN in #Linix.

(It looks like the #FRR project also hasn't made #InclusiveLanguage updates.)

The term "enslave" in particular is one that I haven't yet found discussions about what to standardize replacing it with, and there still seem to be plenty of uses of it in the context of VLAN/VXLAN in #Linix.

(It looks like the #FRR project also hasn't made #InclusiveLanguage updates.)

Gender affects all our lives, and all our stories—but what even is it? What’s it doing, for good and for ill, in fiction? This class dives deep into those questions and more, aiming to equip writers to work with gender in informed, inclusive, purposeful, and joyful ways. Join me to learn together in 3 weeks!

https://loft.org/classes/gender-our-playground-toward-inclusive-informed-joyful-storytelling

@edibuddies @writers #WritingAdvice #WritingCraft #QueerWriters #Romancelandia #InclusiveLanguage #ConsciousLanguage #GenderDiversity #FictionWriting

Happy #PrideMonth! If you're a fiction writer interested in doing more/better with gender diversity & inclusion, consider my July Loft Literary class "Gender is Our Playground." I'm editing the content right now and can report it's chock full of great stuff :)

https://loft.org/classes/gender-our-playground-toward-inclusive-informed-joyful-storytelling

@edibuddies @writers #WritingAdvice #WritingCraft #QueerWriters #Romancelandia #InclusiveLanguage #ConsciousLanguage #GenderDiversity

In the March 2023 edition of The #ConsciousLanguage Newsletter (hashtags mine):

• How "Ma’am" Went From Being a Respectful Word for Some—but Polarizing for Others
• Youse Hear About #InclusiveLanguage?
• Examples of #Ableist Language You May Not Realize You’re Using
• Ancient #Judaism Recognized a Range of #Genders…
• #InclusiveDesign’s Next Chapter: #Design for #Cognition

📗 Read: https://consciousstyleguide.com/conscious-language-newsletter-march-2023/

📥 Subscribe: https://consciousstyleguide.com/newsletters/

#ConsciousLanguage #WritingCommunity @edibuddies

In the March 2023 edition of The #ConsciousLanguage Newsletter (hashtags mine):

• How "Ma’am" Went From Being a Respectful Word for Some—but Polarizing for Others
• Youse Hear About #InclusiveLanguage?
• Examples of #Ableist Language You May Not Realize You’re Using
• Ancient #Judaism Recognized a Range of #Genders…
• #InclusiveDesign’s Next Chapter: #Design for #Cognition

📗 Read: https://consciousstyleguide.com/conscious-language-newsletter-march-2023/

📥 Subscribe: https://consciousstyleguide.com/newsletters/

#ConsciousLanguage #WritingCommunity @edibuddies

Global News BC: B.C. becomes first province to remove outdated gendered and binary language https://globalnews.ca/news/9539227/bc-first-change-gendered-binary-language/ #globalnews #britishcolumbia #news #BCgovernmentlanguage #BCinclusivelanguage #BCgenderedlanguage #Governmentlanguage #BCupdatedlanguage #InclusiveLanguage #Genderedlanguage #outdatedlanguage #GenderNeutral #BCgovernment #non-binary #Politics

Global News BC: B.C. becomes first province to remove outdated gendered and binary language https://globalnews.ca/news/9539227/bc-first-change-gendered-binary-language/ #globalnews #britishcolumbia #news #BCgovernmentlanguage #BCinclusivelanguage #BCgenderedlanguage #Governmentlanguage #BCupdatedlanguage #InclusiveLanguage #Genderedlanguage #outdatedlanguage #GenderNeutral #BCgovernment #non-binary #Politics

New editions of Roald Dahl's children's #books have been edited, removing or modifying text considered offensive today. What do you think?

Nuevas #ediciones de #RoaldDahl remueven o modifican texto considerado ofensivo. ¿Qué opinan?

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2023-02-18/roald-dahl-sensitivity-edits

#libros #LIJ #LenguajeInclusivo #LiteraturaInfantil #LectoresDeSensibilidad # #ChidrensLiterature #InclusiveLanguage #SensitivityReaders #capitalism #capitalismo
#readers #lectores #lectoras #lectura #literatura

New editions of Roald Dahl's children's #books have been edited, removing or modifying text considered offensive today. What do you think?

Nuevas #ediciones de #RoaldDahl remueven o modifican texto considerado ofensivo. ¿Qué opinan?

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2023-02-18/roald-dahl-sensitivity-edits

#libros #LIJ #LenguajeInclusivo #LiteraturaInfantil #LectoresDeSensibilidad # #ChidrensLiterature #InclusiveLanguage #SensitivityReaders #capitalism #capitalismo
#readers #lectores #lectoras #lectura #literatura

New editions of Roald Dahl's children's #books have been edited, removing or modifying text considered offensive today. What do you think?

Nuevas #ediciones de #RoaldDahl remueven o modifican texto considerado ofensivo. ¿Qué opinan?

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2023-02-18/roald-dahl-sensitivity-edits

#libros #LIJ #LenguajeInclusivo #LiteraturaInfantil #LectoresDeSensibilidad # #ChidrensLiterature #InclusiveLanguage #SensitivityReaders #capitalism #capitalismo
#readers #lectores #lectoras #lectura #literatura

New editions of Roald Dahl's children's #books have been edited, removing or modifying text considered offensive today. What do you think?

Nuevas #ediciones de #RoaldDahl remueven o modifican texto considerado ofensivo. ¿Qué opinan?

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2023-02-18/roald-dahl-sensitivity-edits

#libros #LIJ #LenguajeInclusivo #LiteraturaInfantil #LectoresDeSensibilidad # #ChidrensLiterature #InclusiveLanguage #SensitivityReaders #capitalism #capitalismo
#readers #lectores #lectoras #lectura #literatura

New editions of Roald Dahl's children's #books have been edited, removing or modifying text considered offensive today. What do you think?

Nuevas #ediciones de #RoaldDahl remueven o modifican texto considerado ofensivo. ¿Qué opinan?

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2023-02-18/roald-dahl-sensitivity-edits

#libros #LIJ #LenguajeInclusivo #LiteraturaInfantil #LectoresDeSensibilidad # #ChidrensLiterature #InclusiveLanguage #SensitivityReaders #capitalism #capitalismo
#readers #lectores #lectoras #lectura #literatura

One thing I still find myself getting pedantic about, and editing out when I see it, is 'they' used for organisations.

I particularly hate it when used for corporations: "Coles said they are now giving out free apples too."

I wonder if people intuitively think of institutions and organisations as indefinite in a sinister, even conspiratorial sense: "They're watching you." As my cooker brother likes to say, a conspiracy always involves a group of "one or more people". It is plural!

However, I have been using 'they' myself throughout this thread to refer to the various style guides, because I reason that any style guide is a collaborative production so 'they' is the editorial team.

My general rule is that organisations should be treated as singular, not plural, unless a consensus action or decision is implied. Politically, I prefer to emphasise that a corporation acts as a singular entity, but is not a person. So it should not get to shelter under the singular they.

There's a perfectly good pronoun for nonhuman singular agents:

"Coles said it is now giving out free apples too."

But: "The Coles board have approved the free apple scheme."

Animals are a tricky case because we get so anthropomorphic about them, but if the sex or gender of an animal is unknown I reckon you can also use 'it':

"As I picked up the baby chick to determine its sex, it made adorable cheeping noises."

#language #they #SingularThey #InclusiveLanguage #Writing #Editing

One thing I still find myself getting pedantic about, and editing out when I see it, is 'they' used for organisations.

I particularly hate it when used for corporations: "Coles said they are now giving out free apples too."

I wonder if people intuitively think of institutions and organisations as indefinite in a sinister, even conspiratorial sense: "They're watching you." As my cooker brother likes to say, a conspiracy always involves a group of "one or more people". It is plural!

However, I have been using 'they' myself throughout this thread to refer to the various style guides, because I reason that any style guide is a collaborative production so 'they' is the editorial team.

My general rule is that organisations should be treated as singular, not plural, unless a consensus action or decision is implied. Politically, I prefer to emphasise that a corporation acts as a singular entity, but is not a person. So it should not get to shelter under the singular they.

There's a perfectly good pronoun for nonhuman singular agents:

"Coles said it is now giving out free apples too."

But: "The Coles board have approved the free apple scheme."

Animals are a tricky case because we get so anthropomorphic about them, but if the sex or gender of an animal is unknown I reckon you can also use 'it':

"As I picked up the baby chick to determine its sex, it made adorable cheeping noises."

#language #they #SingularThey #InclusiveLanguage #Writing #Editing

But the reflexive pronoun poses a challenge. Some people prefer 'themself' as a singular option, because 'themselves' just _feels_ too plural.

#ChicagoManualOfStyle prefers 'themself' but allows 'themselves'.

The AU Govt #StyleManual prefers 'themselves' but allows 'themself'.

#APA says, "Both 'themselves' and 'themself' are acceptable as reflexive singular pronouns; however, 'themselves' is currently the more common usage."

One big challenge of gender-neutral writing is getting used to the roll between singular and plural when the sentence uses someone's name and then their pronoun. This isn't intuitively 'good grammar' for many people.

I am okay with the shift between "Ali wants a free apple and they want to find their keys" but I kind of struggle with 'themself', which I know some people find more safely singular.

I'd rather use 'themselves', which I think most people instinctively reach for in colloquial settings when the subject is unknown.

I used the following example in a Facebook writers' group, where it was greeted with mirth: "Smells like someone shat themselves."

#language #they #SingularThey #InclusiveLanguage #Writing #Editing

But the reflexive pronoun poses a challenge. Some people prefer 'themself' as a singular option, because 'themselves' just _feels_ too plural.

#ChicagoManualOfStyle prefers 'themself' but allows 'themselves'.

The AU Govt #StyleManual prefers 'themselves' but allows 'themself'.

#APA says, "Both 'themselves' and 'themself' are acceptable as reflexive singular pronouns; however, 'themselves' is currently the more common usage."

One big challenge of gender-neutral writing is getting used to the roll between singular and plural when the sentence uses someone's name and then their pronoun. This isn't intuitively 'good grammar' for many people.

I am okay with the shift between "Ali wants a free apple and they want to find their keys" but I kind of struggle with 'themself', which I know some people find more safely singular.

I'd rather use 'themselves', which I think most people instinctively reach for in colloquial settings when the subject is unknown.

I used the following example in a Facebook writers' group, where it was greeted with mirth: "Smells like someone shat themselves."

#language #they #SingularThey #InclusiveLanguage #Writing #Editing

#APStyle prefers replacing a nonbinary person's pronoun with their name, and to mention in the story that they use gender-neutral pronouns.

#APA embraces the singular they: "because it is inclusive of all people and helps writers avoid making assumptions about gender. Although usage of the singular 'they' was once discouraged in academic writing, many advocacy groups and publishers have accepted and endorsed it, including Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary."

#ChicagoManualOfStyle recommended the singular they in its 14th edition but then got cold feet and rescinded the recommendation in the 15th and 16th editions, but lol, the 17th edition is okay with it, but in 'formal writing' they recommend avoiding it through the following strategies:

– omit pronoun

– repeat the noun, as AP recommends (though they do say, "Take care not to overuse this technique." LOL)

– use plurals or the imperative mood, as AU Govt Style recommends

– use an article instead of a pronoun (e.g. 'the application' instead of 'their application')

– use the pronoun 'one'. But weirdly their example doesn't use it the way I would, e.g. "One must always be careful." #CMOS is like, "An actor in New York earns more than one in Paducah."

CMOS also notes that the singular they is more accepted in UK usage than US usage.

#language #they #SingularThey #InclusiveLanguage #Writing #Editing

#APStyle prefers replacing a nonbinary person's pronoun with their name, and to mention in the story that they use gender-neutral pronouns.

#APA embraces the singular they: "because it is inclusive of all people and helps writers avoid making assumptions about gender. Although usage of the singular 'they' was once discouraged in academic writing, many advocacy groups and publishers have accepted and endorsed it, including Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary."

#ChicagoManualOfStyle recommended the singular they in its 14th edition but then got cold feet and rescinded the recommendation in the 15th and 16th editions, but lol, the 17th edition is okay with it, but in 'formal writing' they recommend avoiding it through the following strategies:

– omit pronoun

– repeat the noun, as AP recommends (though they do say, "Take care not to overuse this technique." LOL)

– use plurals or the imperative mood, as AU Govt Style recommends

– use an article instead of a pronoun (e.g. 'the application' instead of 'their application')

– use the pronoun 'one'. But weirdly their example doesn't use it the way I would, e.g. "One must always be careful." #CMOS is like, "An actor in New York earns more than one in Paducah."

CMOS also notes that the singular they is more accepted in UK usage than US usage.

#language #they #SingularThey #InclusiveLanguage #Writing #Editing

Here's what some major style guides say:

The Australian Government #StyleManual strongly favours the singular they: "Our use of language reflects changes in society. There is wide agreement about using language to support equality between all genders."

Because users of AU Govt Style are often working with institutional or bureaucratic text, they recommend:

– rephrasing in the second person with an instructional tone: "You must provide copies of your application to your referees."

– using plural pronouns: "Candidates must provide copies of their applications to their referees."

– avoiding pronouns altogether: "Every candidate must provide copies of the application to referees."

As an aside, I am not really a fan of AU Govt Style's preference to hyphenate 'gender-fluid', 'gender-queer' and 'non-binary'. I prefer to run them together: genderfluid; genderqueer; nonbinary.

#language #they #SingularThey #InclusiveLanguage #Writing #Editing

Here's what some major style guides say:

The Australian Government #StyleManual strongly favours the singular they: "Our use of language reflects changes in society. There is wide agreement about using language to support equality between all genders."

Because users of AU Govt Style are often working with institutional or bureaucratic text, they recommend:

– rephrasing in the second person with an instructional tone: "You must provide copies of your application to your referees."

– using plural pronouns: "Candidates must provide copies of their applications to their referees."

– avoiding pronouns altogether: "Every candidate must provide copies of the application to referees."

As an aside, I am not really a fan of AU Govt Style's preference to hyphenate 'gender-fluid', 'gender-queer' and 'non-binary'. I prefer to run them together: genderfluid; genderqueer; nonbinary.

#language #they #SingularThey #InclusiveLanguage #Writing #Editing

Re: my previously boosted tweet about the nongendered singular 'they' in English: what convinced me that this is legitimate in formal writing contexts is that it just flows better in a sentence than clunky binary constructs like 'he or she' and 'himself or herself' or the more awkward '(s)he' and 's/he'.

We still conjugate the singular 'they' with plural verbs. It's what we instinctively reach for with an indefinite pronoun (someone, anyone, everyone), or when a sentence agent is unknown:

"Free apples: anyone can take one if they want."

"Someone lost their keys."

"Ali dropped their keys as they were picking up a free apple."

#language #they #SingularThey #InclusiveLanguage #Writing #Editing

Re: my previously boosted tweet about the nongendered singular 'they' in English: what convinced me that this is legitimate in formal writing contexts is that it just flows better in a sentence than clunky binary constructs like 'he or she' and 'himself or herself' or the more awkward '(s)he' and 's/he'.

We still conjugate the singular 'they' with plural verbs. It's what we instinctively reach for with an indefinite pronoun (someone, anyone, everyone), or when a sentence agent is unknown:

"Free apples: anyone can take one if they want."

"Someone lost their keys."

"Ali dropped their keys as they were picking up a free apple."

#language #they #SingularThey #InclusiveLanguage #Writing #Editing