home.social

#correction — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #correction, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Слабкі сторони створення зображень ШІ
    Найбільша вада програмного забезпечення для створення мистецтва штучного інтелекту полягає в тому, що воно повністю ігнорує основи та переходить безпосередньо до розфарбовування самого зображення.

    pixiv.net/novel/show.php?id=23

    <>

    #weaknesses #image #generation #flaw #software #completely #ignores #basic #picture #unstable #process #draw #decide #composition #make #correction #necessary #line #start #foundation #properly #create #overall #exact #coordinate

  2. Слабкі сторони створення зображень ШІ
    Найбільша вада програмного забезпечення для створення мистецтва штучного інтелекту полягає в тому,

    note.com/poison_raika/n/ncb49e

    <>

    #weaknesses #image #generation #flaw #software #completely #ignores #basic #picture #unstable #process #draw #decide #composition #make #correction #necessary #line #start #foundation #properly #create #overall #exact #coordinate #positional #relationship #element #between

  3. CORRECTION FROM SOURCE: Aurania Enters into Agreement with St-Georges to Jointly Advance the Thor Epithermal Gold Project in Iceland

    This release corrects and replaces the press release issued by Aurania Resources Ltd. on April 28, 2026 –…
    #Iceland #IS #Europe #Europa #EU #advance #agreement #aurania #correction #epithermal #Gold #iceland #island #jointly #project #Source #stgeorges #Thor
    europesays.com/2962407/

  4. CORRECTION FROM SOURCE: Aurania Enters into Agreement with St-Georges to Jointly Advance the Thor Epithermal Gold Project in Iceland byteseu.com/1985439/ #advance #agreement #aurania #correction #Epithermal #gold #Iceland #Jointly #project #source #stgeorges #Thor

  5. Audioprof, est un ingénieux outil de correction vocale 🎤 gratuit pour les enseignants qui renverse le problème : au lieu d’écrire, vous parlez. Génial. Gratuit et open source.
    #Enseignants #EdTech #Correction #OutilsNumeriques
    outilstice.com/2026/04/audiopr

  6. Claims on Exercise for Long COVID Were “Overly Assertive,” Agree Meta-Analysis Authors

    By David Tuller, DrPH *This is a crowdfunding month at UC Berkeley. If you’d like to support my work, the link is here. I posted two days ago that a Lancet journal, eClinicalMedicine, had just published a letter of mine, as well as an unsatisfactory corrigendum to the study I had criticized. That study, “Effects of therapeutic interventions on long COVID: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” from Tan et al, reported “high-certainty evidence” in favor of exercise interventions, and suggested they “should be prioritized.”  My letter challenged that perspective. The corrigendum related to just one concern I had raised, and I found it unsatisfactory. As it turned out, the record wasn’t complete. I had assumed the corrigendum was, in effect, the response to my letter. But at some point since then, the journal posted a direct response to my letter from the meta-analysis authors, in which they thanked me for my observations, among other remarks.  Here is one passage from their response that jumps out:  “We must acknowledge that certain expressions used in our writing, such as “high-certainty evidence” and “should be prioritized,” may have come across as overly assertive and could potentially lead to misinterpretation by readers. It would indeed have been more appropriate to phrase these as “evidence of moderate certainty” or “may be considered a preferred option.” We deeply appreciate your valuable feedback regarding these less precise formulations. Your comments contribute significantly to the rigor of academic discourse.” I’m glad the authors agree that they should have toned down their language, although their substitute phrasings are still too positive, in my view. What I find especially perplexing is that they had an opportunity to fix these conclusions with the corrigendum—and they didn’t. As it stands, the article continues to assert that there is “high-certainty evidence” for exercise …

    trialbyerror.org/2026/04/25/cl

  7. Claims on Exercise for Long COVID Were “Overly Assertive,” Agree Meta-Analysis Authors

    By David Tuller, DrPH *This is a crowdfunding month at UC Berkeley. If you’d like to support my work, the link is here. I posted two days ago that a Lancet journal, eClinicalMedicine, had just published a letter of mine, as well as an unsatisfactory corrigendum to the study I had criticized. That study, “Effects of therapeutic interventions on long COVID: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” from Tan et al, reported “high-certainty evidence” in favor of exercise interventions, and suggested they “should be prioritized.”  My letter challenged that perspective. The corrigendum related to just one concern I had raised, and I found it unsatisfactory. As it turned out, the record wasn’t complete. I had assumed the corrigendum was, in effect, the response to my letter. But at some point since then, the journal posted a direct response to my letter from the meta-analysis authors, in which they thanked me for my observations, among other remarks.  Here is one passage from their response that jumps out:  “We must acknowledge that certain expressions used in our writing, such as “high-certainty evidence” and “should be prioritized,” may have come across as overly assertive and could potentially lead to misinterpretation by readers. It would indeed have been more appropriate to phrase these as “evidence of moderate certainty” or “may be considered a preferred option.” We deeply appreciate your valuable feedback regarding these less precise formulations. Your comments contribute significantly to the rigor of academic discourse.” I’m glad the authors agree that they should have toned down their language, although their substitute phrasings are still too positive, in my view. What I find especially perplexing is that they had an opportunity to fix these conclusions with the corrigendum—and they didn’t. As it stands, the article continues to assert that there is “high-certainty evidence” for exercise …

    trialbyerror.org/2026/04/25/cl

  8. Claims on Exercise for Long COVID Were “Overly Assertive,” Agree Meta-Analysis Authors

    By David Tuller, DrPH *This is a crowdfunding month at UC Berkeley. If you’d like to support my work, the link is here. I posted two days ago that a Lancet journal, eClinicalMedicine, had just published a letter of mine, as well as an unsatisfactory corrigendum to the study I had criticized. That study, “Effects of therapeutic interventions on long COVID: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” from Tan et al, reported “high-certainty evidence” in favor of exercise interventions, and suggested they “should be prioritized.”  My letter challenged that perspective. The corrigendum related to just one concern I had raised, and I found it unsatisfactory. As it turned out, the record wasn’t complete. I had assumed the corrigendum was, in effect, the response to my letter. But at some point since then, the journal posted a direct response to my letter from the meta-analysis authors, in which they thanked me for my observations, among other remarks.  Here is one passage from their response that jumps out:  “We must acknowledge that certain expressions used in our writing, such as “high-certainty evidence” and “should be prioritized,” may have come across as overly assertive and could potentially lead to misinterpretation by readers. It would indeed have been more appropriate to phrase these as “evidence of moderate certainty” or “may be considered a preferred option.” We deeply appreciate your valuable feedback regarding these less precise formulations. Your comments contribute significantly to the rigor of academic discourse.” I’m glad the authors agree that they should have toned down their language, although their substitute phrasings are still too positive, in my view. What I find especially perplexing is that they had an opportunity to fix these conclusions with the corrigendum—and they didn’t. As it stands, the article continues to assert that there is “high-certainty evidence” for exercise …

    trialbyerror.org/2026/04/25/cl

  9. Claims on Exercise for Long COVID Were “Overly Assertive,” Agree Meta-Analysis Authors

    By David Tuller, DrPH *This is a crowdfunding month at UC Berkeley. If you’d like to support my work, the link is here. I posted two days ago that a Lancet journal, eClinicalMedicine, had just published a letter of mine, as well as an unsatisfactory corrigendum to the study I had criticized. That study, “Effects of therapeutic interventions on long COVID: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” from Tan et al, reported “high-certainty evidence” in favor of exercise interventions, and suggested they “should be prioritized.”  My letter challenged that perspective. The corrigendum related to just one concern I had raised, and I found it unsatisfactory. As it turned out, the record wasn’t complete. I had assumed the corrigendum was, in effect, the response to my letter. But at some point since then, the journal posted a direct response to my letter from the meta-analysis authors, in which they thanked me for my observations, among other remarks.  Here is one passage from their response that jumps out:  “We must acknowledge that certain expressions used in our writing, such as “high-certainty evidence” and “should be prioritized,” may have come across as overly assertive and could potentially lead to misinterpretation by readers. It would indeed have been more appropriate to phrase these as “evidence of moderate certainty” or “may be considered a preferred option.” We deeply appreciate your valuable feedback regarding these less precise formulations. Your comments contribute significantly to the rigor of academic discourse.” I’m glad the authors agree that they should have toned down their language, although their substitute phrasings are still too positive, in my view. What I find especially perplexing is that they had an opportunity to fix these conclusions with the corrigendum—and they didn’t. As it stands, the article continues to assert that there is “high-certainty evidence” for exercise …

    trialbyerror.org/2026/04/25/cl

  10. Claims on Exercise for Long COVID Were “Overly Assertive,” Agree Meta-Analysis Authors

    By David Tuller, DrPH *This is a crowdfunding month at UC Berkeley. If you’d like to support my work, the link is here. I posted two days ago that a Lancet journal, eClinicalMedicine, had just published a letter of mine, as well as an unsatisfactory corrigendum to the study I had criticized. That study, “Effects of therapeutic interventions on long COVID: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” from Tan et al, reported “high-certainty evidence” in favor of exercise interventions, and suggested they “should be prioritized.”  My letter challenged that perspective. The corrigendum related to just one concern I had raised, and I found it unsatisfactory. As it turned out, the record wasn’t complete. I had assumed the corrigendum was, in effect, the response to my letter. But at some point since then, the journal posted a direct response to my letter from the meta-analysis authors, in which they thanked me for my observations, among other remarks.  Here is one passage from their response that jumps out:  “We must acknowledge that certain expressions used in our writing, such as “high-certainty evidence” and “should be prioritized,” may have come across as overly assertive and could potentially lead to misinterpretation by readers. It would indeed have been more appropriate to phrase these as “evidence of moderate certainty” or “may be considered a preferred option.” We deeply appreciate your valuable feedback regarding these less precise formulations. Your comments contribute significantly to the rigor of academic discourse.” I’m glad the authors agree that they should have toned down their language, although their substitute phrasings are still too positive, in my view. What I find especially perplexing is that they had an opportunity to fix these conclusions with the corrigendum—and they didn’t. As it stands, the article continues to assert that there is “high-certainty evidence” for exercise …

    trialbyerror.org/2026/04/25/cl

  11. UPDATE: The image is from Israel and not England, the original poster on BlueSky deleted the post after I mentioned the origin of the image.
    Thanks to @2legged here is the link to Cnn article about it:
    edition.cnn.com/2026/04/23/mid

    (NOT)England today:A Jew was arrested because of his Kippah
    That’s what the police did before giving it back to her.

    This is just insane.

    #UK #Antisemitsm #isra el #Palestine #Fascism #Israel #Correction #CNN

  12. Слабкі сторони створення зображень ШІ
    Найбільша вада програмного забезпечення для створення мистецтва штучного інтелекту полягає в тому, що воно повністю ігнорує основи та переходить безпосередньо до розфарбовування самого зображення.

    pixiv.net/novel/show.php?id=23

    <>

    #weaknesses #image #generation #flaw #software #completely #ignores #basic #picture #unstable #process #draw #decide #composition #make #correction #necessary #line #start #foundation #properly #create #overall #exact #coordinate

  13. A quotation from Josh Billings

    Convince a phool ov hiz errors, and you make him yure enemy.
     
    [Convince a fool of his errors, and you make him your enemy.]

    Josh Billings (1818-1885) American humorist, aphorist [pseud. of Henry Wheeler Shaw]
    Josh Billings’ Farmer’s Allminax, 1872-07 (1872 ed.)

    More about this quote: wist.info/billings-josh/83303/

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #joshbillings #pride #ego #correction #dolt #embarrassment #enemy #error #exposure #fool #resentment #shame

  14. A quotation from Josh Billings

    Convince a phool ov hiz errors, and you make him yure enemy.
     
    [Convince a fool of his errors, and you make him your enemy.]

    Josh Billings (1818-1885) American humorist, aphorist [pseud. of Henry Wheeler Shaw]
    Josh Billings’ Farmer’s Allminax, 1872-07 (1872 ed.)

    More about this quote: wist.info/billings-josh/83303/

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #joshbillings #pride #ego #correction #dolt #embarrassment #enemy #error #exposure #fool #resentment #shame

  15. A quotation from Josh Billings

    Convince a phool ov hiz errors, and you make him yure enemy.
     
    [Convince a fool of his errors, and you make him your enemy.]

    Josh Billings (1818-1885) American humorist, aphorist [pseud. of Henry Wheeler Shaw]
    Josh Billings’ Farmer’s Allminax, 1872-07 (1872 ed.)

    More about this quote: wist.info/billings-josh/83303/

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #joshbillings #pride #ego #correction #dolt #embarrassment #enemy #error #exposure #fool #resentment #shame

  16. A quotation from Josh Billings

    Convince a phool ov hiz errors, and you make him yure enemy.
     
    [Convince a fool of his errors, and you make him your enemy.]

    Josh Billings (1818-1885) American humorist, aphorist [pseud. of Henry Wheeler Shaw]
    Josh Billings’ Farmer’s Allminax, 1872-07 (1872 ed.)

    More about this quote: wist.info/billings-josh/83303/

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #joshbillings #pride #ego #correction #dolt #embarrassment #enemy #error #exposure #fool #resentment #shame

  17. A quotation from Josh Billings

    Convince a phool ov hiz errors, and you make him yure enemy.
     
    [Convince a fool of his errors, and you make him your enemy.]

    Josh Billings (1818-1885) American humorist, aphorist [pseud. of Henry Wheeler Shaw]
    Josh Billings’ Farmer’s Allminax, 1872-07 (1872 ed.)

    More about this quote: wist.info/billings-josh/83303/

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #joshbillings #pride #ego #correction #dolt #embarrassment #enemy #error #exposure #fool #resentment #shame

  18. @arstechnica
    #correction: The presidency of #convictedFelon #sexOffender #DonaldTrump is not an "administration". The proper term is "regime", which he is fronting in a country that doesn't abide royalty.

  19. @arstechnica
    #correction: The presidency of #convictedFelon #sexOffender #DonaldTrump is not an "administration". The proper term is "regime", which he is fronting in a country that doesn't abide royalty.

  20. @arstechnica
    #correction: The presidency of #convictedFelon #sexOffender #DonaldTrump is not an "administration". The proper term is "regime", which he is fronting in a country that doesn't abide royalty.

  21. @arstechnica
    #correction: The presidency of #convictedFelon #sexOffender #DonaldTrump is not an "administration". The proper term is "regime", which he is fronting in a country that doesn't abide royalty.

  22. @arstechnica
    #correction: The presidency of #convictedFelon #sexOffender #DonaldTrump is not an "administration". The proper term is "regime", which he is fronting in a country that doesn't abide royalty.

  23. Слабкі сторони створення зображень ШІ
    Найбільша вада програмного забезпечення для створення мистецтва штучного інтелекту полягає в тому,

    note.com/poison_raika/n/ncb49e

    <>

    #weaknesses #image #generation #flaw #software #completely #ignores #basic #picture #unstable #process #draw #decide #composition #make #correction #necessary #line #start #foundation #properly #create #overall #exact #coordinate #positional #relationship #element #between

  24. 🤗🫂💛💚🧡🤍❤️💜💛💚💙💗🩵🩶🩷❤️‍🔥😊🕊️🫂🤗*It's one thing not to believe!*but let us not disrespect God!*or the People that believe!*& Sorry for the correction but for your own good I felt compelled to do so in Love!*Light!*& As GENTLY as I could!*& I hope you have a Wonderful Epiphany Day!🤗🫂🧡🤍❤️❤️💛💚💙💗🩵🩶🩷❤️‍🔥😊🕊️🫂🤗

    #Loving #Light #Gentle #Correction #and #have #a #wonderful #Epiphany #Day #God

  25. 🤗🫂💛💚🧡🤍❤️💜💛💚💙💗🩵🩶🩷❤️‍🔥😊🕊️🫂🤗*It's one thing not to believe!*but let us not disrespect God!*or the People that believe!*& Sorry for the correction but for your own good I felt compelled to do so in Love!*Light!*& As GENTLY as I could!*& I hope you have a Wonderful Epiphany Day!🤗🫂🧡🤍❤️❤️💛💚💙💗🩵🩶🩷❤️‍🔥😊🕊️🫂🤗

    #Loving #Light #Gentle #Correction #and #have #a #wonderful #Epiphany #Day #God

  26. @UncleDuke1969

    🤗🫂💛💚🧡🤍❤️💜💛💚💙💗🩵🩶🩷❤️‍🔥😊🕊️🫂🤗*It's one thing not to believe!*but let us not disrespect God!*or the People that believe!*& Sorry for the correction but for your own good I felt compelled to do so in Love!*Light!*& As GENTLY as I could!*& I hope you have a Wonderful Epiphany Day!🤗🫂🧡🤍❤️❤️💛💚💙💗🩵🩶🩷❤️‍🔥😊🕊️🫂🤗

    #Loving #Light #Gentle #Correction #and #have #a #wonderful #Epiphany #Day #God

  27. @UncleDuke1969

    🤗🫂💛💚🧡🤍❤️💜💛💚💙💗🩵🩶🩷❤️‍🔥😊🕊️🫂🤗*It's one thing not to believe!*but let us not disrespect God!*or the People that believe!*& Sorry for the correction but for your own good I felt compelled to do so in Love!*Light!*& As GENTLY as I could!*& I hope you have a Wonderful Epiphany Day!🤗🫂🧡🤍❤️❤️💛💚💙💗🩵🩶🩷❤️‍🔥😊🕊️🫂🤗

    #Loving #Light #Gentle #Correction #and #have #a #wonderful #Epiphany #Day #God

  28. 🤗🫂💛💚🧡🤍❤️💜💛💚💙💗🩵🩶🩷❤️‍🔥😊🕊️🫂🤗*It's one thing not to believe!*but let us not disrespect God!*or the People that believe!*& Sorry for the correction but for your own good I felt compelled to do so in Love!*Light!*& As GENTLY as I could!*& I hope you have a Wonderful Epiphany Day!🤗🫂🧡🤍❤️❤️💛💚💙💗🩵🩶🩷❤️‍🔥😊🕊️🫂🤗

    #Loving #Light #Gentle #Correction #and #have #a #wonderful #Epiphany #Day #God