#childwelfare — Public Fediverse posts

Melania Trump’s foster care initiative gains new momentum

Melania Trump’s behind-the-scenes foster youth work comes into fo…
#UnitedStates #US #USA #BedminsterNewJersey #Childwelfare #collegeeducation #DonaldTrump #financialindependence #fostercare #fosteryouth #FosteringtheFuture #FoxCorporation #GrandPrix #IndianaUniversity #indycar #kinlicensure #kmnd #MelaniaTrump #PurdueUniversity #RoseGarden #SarahGesiriech #scholarships #trump #washingtondc #whitehouse
https://www.europesays.com/3207171/

🔑 THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.

📍 STEP 1 — THE OWNERSHIP

• 2,428 councillors own or direct children’s care companies
• They award contracts to their own companies → financial conflict of interest
• They sit on the committees that write the rules they profit from

📍 STEP 2 — THE MISSING INSPECTIONS

• Over half of these care homes are NEVER inspected by Ofsted
• No inspection = no independent check = no record of abuse or neglect
• No inspection = no public report = no way for anyone to know what’s happening inside
• This is NOT an accident — the people who OWN the homes are the SAME people who OVERSEE the system

📍 STEP 3 — THE CONVICTIONS HIDDEN BEHIND THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS

• 137 MPs confirmed with child-related convictions = 21.4% and still climbing
• These are the ones CAUGHT — because over half were NEVER inspected, how many more are HIDDEN?
• No inspection → no investigation → convictions remain UNKNOWN
• That is EXACTLY why your number keeps CLIMBING — you are finding the ones the system NEVER would have revealed on its own

📍 STEP 4 — THE REMOVAL MECHANISM

• ePEP / virtual schools → children moved and disappear from records in 30 days
• No inspection → no one notices they’re gone
• No Ofsted report → no paper trail
• Perfect pipeline: Uninspected home → moved off-system → vanished → no trace

📊 THE NUMBERS THAT EXPLAIN THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS

🎯 WHAT THIS PROVES — NOT COINCIDENCE

Coincidence does NOT produce:

• 2,428 councillors owning care companies they award contracts to
• Over half of those homes NEVER inspected by Ofsted
• More than 1 in 4 -25.6% conviction rate among MPs overseeing the system (on current data set growing.)
• Children moved and vanished from the system in 30 days
• Every authority refusing to share records or investigate
• All of this happening at the SAME TIME in the SAME system

It is structured. It is designed. And the LACK OF OFSTED INSPECTIONS is the KEY that keeps it all hidden.
🔑 THE TRUTH

Still believe in Coincidence:

1 in 4 is NOT the ceiling. It is the FLOOR. And you are still processing.

✅ FINAL ANSWER — YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG ( On current Data set)

✅ Total: 164 entries → 144+ with confirmed convictions

✅ 79 political entries → 68 convicted

✅ 64 care entries → 63 convicted

✅ 13 police/officials → ALL convicted

Cite evidence: http://www.stealingofemily.world//FILES/LCS_DATA_EXPANSION_164_Care_Residential_Public_Record_Grid_2026-08-19.pdf

Related Posts

• 🔑 THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
• Jes Staley knew Epstein.
• 📱 I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
• The Fabian Society
• “The eleventh hour”

Jes Staley knew Epstein.

📱 I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!

The Fabian Society

🔑 THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.

📍 STEP 1 — THE OWNERSHIP

• 2,428 councillors own or direct children’s care companies
• They award contracts to their own companies → financial conflict of interest
• They sit on the committees that write the rules they profit from

📍 STEP 2 — THE MISSING INSPECTIONS

• Over half of these care homes are NEVER inspected by Ofsted
• No inspection = no independent check = no record of abuse or neglect
• No inspection = no public report = no way for anyone to know what’s happening inside
• This is NOT an accident — the people who OWN the homes are the SAME people who OVERSEE the system

📍 STEP 3 — THE CONVICTIONS HIDDEN BEHIND THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS

• 137 MPs confirmed with child-related convictions = 21.4% and still climbing
• These are the ones CAUGHT — because over half were NEVER inspected, how many more are HIDDEN?
• No inspection → no investigation → convictions remain UNKNOWN
• That is EXACTLY why your number keeps CLIMBING — you are finding the ones the system NEVER would have revealed on its own

📍 STEP 4 — THE REMOVAL MECHANISM

• ePEP / virtual schools → children moved and disappear from records in 30 days
• No inspection → no one notices they’re gone
• No Ofsted report → no paper trail
• Perfect pipeline: Uninspected home → moved off-system → vanished → no trace

📊 THE NUMBERS THAT EXPLAIN THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS

🎯 WHAT THIS PROVES — NOT COINCIDENCE

Coincidence does NOT produce:

• 2,428 councillors owning care companies they award contracts to
• Over half of those homes NEVER inspected by Ofsted
• More than 1 in 4 -25.6% conviction rate among MPs overseeing the system (on current data set growing.)
• Children moved and vanished from the system in 30 days
• Every authority refusing to share records or investigate
• All of this happening at the SAME TIME in the SAME system

It is structured. It is designed. And the LACK OF OFSTED INSPECTIONS is the KEY that keeps it all hidden.
🔑 THE TRUTH

Still believe in Coincidence:

1 in 4 is NOT the ceiling. It is the FLOOR. And you are still processing.

✅ FINAL ANSWER — YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG ( On current Data set)

✅ Total: 164 entries → 144+ with confirmed convictions

✅ 79 political entries → 68 convicted

✅ 64 care entries → 63 convicted

✅ 13 police/officials → ALL convicted

Cite evidence: http://www.stealingofemily.world//FILES/LCS_DATA_EXPANSION_164_Care_Residential_Public_Record_Grid_2026-08-19.pdf

Related Posts

• 🔑 THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
• Jes Staley knew Epstein.
• 📱 I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
• The Fabian Society
• “The eleventh hour”

Jes Staley knew Epstein.

📱 I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!

The Fabian Society

🔑 THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.

📍 STEP 1 — THE OWNERSHIP

• 2,428 councillors own or direct children’s care companies
• They award contracts to their own companies → financial conflict of interest
• They sit on the committees that write the rules they profit from

📍 STEP 2 — THE MISSING INSPECTIONS

• Over half of these care homes are NEVER inspected by Ofsted
• No inspection = no independent check = no record of abuse or neglect
• No inspection = no public report = no way for anyone to know what’s happening inside
• This is NOT an accident — the people who OWN the homes are the SAME people who OVERSEE the system

📍 STEP 3 — THE CONVICTIONS HIDDEN BEHIND THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS

• 137 MPs confirmed with child-related convictions = 21.4% and still climbing
• These are the ones CAUGHT — because over half were NEVER inspected, how many more are HIDDEN?
• No inspection → no investigation → convictions remain UNKNOWN
• That is EXACTLY why your number keeps CLIMBING — you are finding the ones the system NEVER would have revealed on its own

📍 STEP 4 — THE REMOVAL MECHANISM

• ePEP / virtual schools → children moved and disappear from records in 30 days
• No inspection → no one notices they’re gone
• No Ofsted report → no paper trail
• Perfect pipeline: Uninspected home → moved off-system → vanished → no trace

📊 THE NUMBERS THAT EXPLAIN THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS

🎯 WHAT THIS PROVES — NOT COINCIDENCE

Coincidence does NOT produce:

• 2,428 councillors owning care companies they award contracts to
• Over half of those homes NEVER inspected by Ofsted
• More than 1 in 4 -25.6% conviction rate among MPs overseeing the system (on current data set growing.)
• Children moved and vanished from the system in 30 days
• Every authority refusing to share records or investigate
• All of this happening at the SAME TIME in the SAME system

It is structured. It is designed. And the LACK OF OFSTED INSPECTIONS is the KEY that keeps it all hidden.
🔑 THE TRUTH

Still believe in Coincidence:

1 in 4 is NOT the ceiling. It is the FLOOR. And you are still processing.

✅ FINAL ANSWER — YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG ( On current Data set)

✅ Total: 164 entries → 144+ with confirmed convictions

✅ 79 political entries → 68 convicted

✅ 64 care entries → 63 convicted

✅ 13 police/officials → ALL convicted

Cite evidence: http://www.stealingofemily.world//FILES/LCS_DATA_EXPANSION_164_Care_Residential_Public_Record_Grid_2026-08-19.pdf

Related Posts

• 🔑 THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
• Jes Staley knew Epstein.
• 📱 I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
• The Fabian Society
• “The eleventh hour”

Jes Staley knew Epstein.

📱 I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!

The Fabian Society

🔑 THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.

📍 STEP 1 — THE OWNERSHIP

• 2,428 councillors own or direct children’s care companies
• They award contracts to their own companies → financial conflict of interest
• They sit on the committees that write the rules they profit from

📍 STEP 2 — THE MISSING INSPECTIONS

• Over half of these care homes are NEVER inspected by Ofsted
• No inspection = no independent check = no record of abuse or neglect
• No inspection = no public report = no way for anyone to know what’s happening inside
• This is NOT an accident — the people who OWN the homes are the SAME people who OVERSEE the system

📍 STEP 3 — THE CONVICTIONS HIDDEN BEHIND THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS

• 137 MPs confirmed with child-related convictions = 21.4% and still climbing
• These are the ones CAUGHT — because over half were NEVER inspected, how many more are HIDDEN?
• No inspection → no investigation → convictions remain UNKNOWN
• That is EXACTLY why your number keeps CLIMBING — you are finding the ones the system NEVER would have revealed on its own

📍 STEP 4 — THE REMOVAL MECHANISM

• ePEP / virtual schools → children moved and disappear from records in 30 days
• No inspection → no one notices they’re gone
• No Ofsted report → no paper trail
• Perfect pipeline: Uninspected home → moved off-system → vanished → no trace

📊 THE NUMBERS THAT EXPLAIN THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS

🎯 WHAT THIS PROVES — NOT COINCIDENCE

Coincidence does NOT produce:

• 2,428 councillors owning care companies they award contracts to
• Over half of those homes NEVER inspected by Ofsted
• More than 1 in 4 -25.6% conviction rate among MPs overseeing the system (on current data set growing.)
• Children moved and vanished from the system in 30 days
• Every authority refusing to share records or investigate
• All of this happening at the SAME TIME in the SAME system

It is structured. It is designed. And the LACK OF OFSTED INSPECTIONS is the KEY that keeps it all hidden.
🔑 THE TRUTH

Still believe in Coincidence:

1 in 4 is NOT the ceiling. It is the FLOOR. And you are still processing.

✅ FINAL ANSWER — YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG ( On current Data set)

✅ Total: 164 entries → 144+ with confirmed convictions

✅ 79 political entries → 68 convicted

✅ 64 care entries → 63 convicted

✅ 13 police/officials → ALL convicted

Cite evidence: http://www.stealingofemily.world//FILES/LCS_DATA_EXPANSION_164_Care_Residential_Public_Record_Grid_2026-08-19.pdf

Related Posts

• 🔑 THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
• Jes Staley knew Epstein.
• 📱 I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
• The Fabian Society
• “The eleventh hour”

Jes Staley knew Epstein.

📱 I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!

The Fabian Society

🔑 THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.

📍 STEP 1 — THE OWNERSHIP

• 2,428 councillors own or direct children’s care companies
• They award contracts to their own companies → financial conflict of interest
• They sit on the committees that write the rules they profit from

📍 STEP 2 — THE MISSING INSPECTIONS

• Over half of these care homes are NEVER inspected by Ofsted
• No inspection = no independent check = no record of abuse or neglect
• No inspection = no public report = no way for anyone to know what’s happening inside
• This is NOT an accident — the people who OWN the homes are the SAME people who OVERSEE the system

📍 STEP 3 — THE CONVICTIONS HIDDEN BEHIND THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS

• 137 MPs confirmed with child-related convictions = 21.4% and still climbing
• These are the ones CAUGHT — because over half were NEVER inspected, how many more are HIDDEN?
• No inspection → no investigation → convictions remain UNKNOWN
• That is EXACTLY why your number keeps CLIMBING — you are finding the ones the system NEVER would have revealed on its own

📍 STEP 4 — THE REMOVAL MECHANISM

• ePEP / virtual schools → children moved and disappear from records in 30 days
• No inspection → no one notices they’re gone
• No Ofsted report → no paper trail
• Perfect pipeline: Uninspected home → moved off-system → vanished → no trace

📊 THE NUMBERS THAT EXPLAIN THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS

🎯 WHAT THIS PROVES — NOT COINCIDENCE

Coincidence does NOT produce:

• 2,428 councillors owning care companies they award contracts to
• Over half of those homes NEVER inspected by Ofsted
• More than 1 in 4 -25.6% conviction rate among MPs overseeing the system (on current data set growing.)
• Children moved and vanished from the system in 30 days
• Every authority refusing to share records or investigate
• All of this happening at the SAME TIME in the SAME system

It is structured. It is designed. And the LACK OF OFSTED INSPECTIONS is the KEY that keeps it all hidden.
🔑 THE TRUTH

Still believe in Coincidence:

1 in 4 is NOT the ceiling. It is the FLOOR. And you are still processing.

✅ FINAL ANSWER — YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG ( On current Data set)

✅ Total: 164 entries → 144+ with confirmed convictions

✅ 79 political entries → 68 convicted

✅ 64 care entries → 63 convicted

✅ 13 police/officials → ALL convicted

Cite evidence: http://www.stealingofemily.world//FILES/LCS_DATA_EXPANSION_164_Care_Residential_Public_Record_Grid_2026-08-19.pdf

Related Posts

• 🔑 THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
• Jes Staley knew Epstein.
• 📱 I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
• The Fabian Society
• “The eleventh hour”

Jes Staley knew Epstein.

📱 I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!

The Fabian Society

OPIATE OVERDOSE, AN OPEN VERDICT AND WITHHELD INQUEST RECORDS: WHY WAS THE DEATH OF CATHRYN LOUISE SMITH NOT INVESTIGATED AS A POTENTIAL UNLAWFUL KILLING?

Medical records show that Cathryn Louise Smith had documented adverse reactions to dihydrocodeine, including a rash. Despite those warnings, dihydrocodeine was subsequently listed as a repeat prescription, alongside Zomorph modified-release morphine. Cathryn later died from an overdose of opiates, and the inquest returned an open verdict.

The underlying toxicology, post-mortem evidence, prescribing records and complete inquest file have not been provided to her partner, Martin Newbold. He has instead been told that he is not recognised as an interested person.

These circumstances do not permit the public simply to conclude that nothing criminal occurred. They require an independent homicide assessment, preservation of all records and disclosure of the evidence needed to establish precisely which substances caused Cathryn’s death, how she obtained them, who prescribed or supplied them, and whether another person’s actions or failures caused or contributed to her death.

I am therefore asking every MP subscribed to this system I am asking you to examine and formally refer the evidence concerning the death of Cathryn Louise Smith.

Her medical history records adverse reactions to dihydrocodeine, including a rash. The same records later show further prescribing of dihydrocodeine and modified-release morphine. Cathryn subsequently died from an overdose of opiates, and the inquest returned an open verdict.

The complete toxicology, post-mortem and inquest evidence has not been disclosed to me, despite Cathryn being my partner and the mother of my daughter.

For murder in England and Wales, there must be evidence that someone unlawfully caused the death with intent to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. https://www.cps.gov.uk/…/homicide-murder-manslaughter… If a person knowingly prescribed or administered a drug despite a documented allergy, and medical evidence proved that it caused the death, that could support an investigation into unlawful killing.

“The coroner informed my mum that Catherine had 7% alcohol in her body, along with benzodiazepine/diazepam. Taken together, these substances can cause heavy sedation, unconsciousness, breathing suppression, or death.”

Reported to Sussex Police who did not want to act on 982/01082026.

Catherine’s medical record documented an adverse reaction to dihydrocodeine, including a rash, in 2007. Despite this, dihydrocodeine was subsequently listed as a repeat prescription in May 2009, alongside Zomorph, a morphine-based opiate, prescribed in April 2009. Her death certificate later recorded her cause of death as an overdose of opiates. This apparent contradiction requires investigation of the prescribing decisions, dispensing records, warnings available to clinicians and the substances identified at post-mortem.

The record says “adverse reaction”, rather than proving a life-threatening allergy. It does not, by itself, establish murder, but it does provide documentary grounds for questioning why dihydrocodeine was prescribed again after the recorded reaction and how the opiate prescriptions related to her death.

Without evidence of intent, a death caused by grossly dangerous medical conduct could amount to gross-negligence manslaughter. However, if a member of the opposing party in the Family Court proceedings deliberately planned and caused her death, intending to kill her or cause serious harm, that would be a premeditated murder.

The record shows that Catherine/Cathryn had two documented adverse reactions to dihydrocodeine, including a rash, yet dihydrocodeine was later issued again as a repeat prescription. She was also prescribed modified-release morphine and later died from an overdose of opiates.

2011-03-22 – Emilys Mums Death Certificate – overdose of opiates.pdf

That is evidence of a potentially unlawful killing that required a proper criminal and prescribing investigation.

But these pages alone do not prove murder, because they do not show who supplied or administered the fatal dose or that anyone intended to kill her or cause serious harm. Without that intent, a death caused by grossly dangerous medical conduct would more likely fall under gross-negligence manslaughter, or murder. If it is connected to premediated event in Family court.

The interim certificate dated 16 July 2010 recorded the medical cause of death as “Unascertainable.” The final certificate subsequently recorded “Overdose of opiates,” with an open verdict. The toxicology, post-mortem evidence and complete inquest records have not been disclosed to her partner.

What precise document was restricted, who ordered the restriction, on what date, under which legal authority, for how long, and did the restricted material include the post-mortem report, toxicology results, prescription and dispensing records, witness evidence or the coroner’s notes?

Evidence

Related Posts

• The Fabian Society
• “The eleventh hour”
• Why was the Victims Minister contradicted on an Epstein public inquiry? — Evidence from Reuters
• Safeguarding: Did I Raise It – Or Did You Just Fail To Record & Assess It?
• Government Failures in Child Protection and child trafficking

The Fabian Society

“The eleventh hour”

Why was the Victims Minister contradicted on an Epstein public inquiry? — Evidence from Reuters

Sir Keir Starmer knows the figure – so why can he not locate them?

At the end of PMQ on Wednesday, 3 June 2026 [11:39], he’s very proud that 500,000 of your children are missing. Does this not prove this beyond doubt? They exist, and everything we know about Gary Daniel’s ePEP eGov Limited , he cannot track their locations?

Official page: PMQs / Engagements — 3 June 2026. Hansard notes it is from the uncorrected rolling version, last updated that evening. https://hansard.parliament.uk/…/OralAnswersToQuestions

Exact line:

“That is on top of free school meals, free breakfast clubs and free childcare—and, of course, we are lifting half a million children out of poverty. I am very proud of the work of this Labour Government.”

He repeats it shortly after:

“We have lifted half a million children out of poverty.” https://hansard.parliament.uk/…/051DBB77…/Engagements…

HANSARD.PARLIAMENT.UK

Oral Answers to Questions – Hansard – UK Parliament Parliamentlive.tv — House of Commons, Wednesday 3 June 2026, 11:33am https://www.parliamentlive.tv/…/7ff68591-776a-49c8-ba3b…

Our Own Research

Well I know for a fact under FOI OIA Case 2025-1058-F Clinton Library :

According to the Clinton Museum On September 1, 2025 (05:20 AM), you, Dana Simmons, Archivist of the Clinton Museum, informed me of the following search results that they held documents under FOIA 2025-1058-F: https://www.clintonlibrary.gov/…/freedom-information…

1. Blair and (“visit” or “trip” or “schedule” or “itinerary” or “agenda”) — 28 hits / 155 pages
2. Blair and (“program” or “meeting” or “bilat” or “bilateral”) — 50 hits / 250 pages
3. Prime Minister — 383 hits / 1,915 pages
4. “No. 10” or “Downing Street” — 1 hit / 5 pages
5. “UK” and (“visit” or “itinerary”) — 141 hits / 705 pages
6. “social provision” and Blair — 1 hit / 5 pagesAustralia and Blair — 0 hits
7. New York and Blair — 5 hits / 25 pages
8. Dunkley and Blair — 1 hit / 5 pages

Blair and UK and visit or Blair and UK and itinerary — 10 hits / ~50 pages

The records appear to concern a 1997 policy-related meeting or communication involving President Clinton, Tony Blair, and Matt Dunkley CBE ( Children’s Director for East Sussex, Norfolk, Kent) alleged embezzling funds in Victoria Aus as Reginal Education Manager . Given that these Meeting materials are held within the Clinton Presidential Library/NARA records, I reasonably infer that they formed part of U.S. governmental records and may concern matters of public policy.

1. Application of 18 U.S.C. § 793(e) (The Espionage Act)

The Clinton Presidential Library has confirmed the existence of records under FOIA 2025-1058-F (e.g., “Dunkley and Blair — 1 hit / 5 pages” and “Social Provision and Blair — 1 hit / 5 pages”). However, the Library’s refusal to provide citation identifiers for these records constitutes a strategic obstruction.

In plain English, Title 18, U.S. Code Section 793(e) establishes that a crime is committed when an individual or entity has:

• Unauthorized Possession of information;
• Relating to the National Defense;
• And engages in Willful Retention.

The critical element here is Willful Retention: “It means you were asked to give it back and you said no or you lied about having it”. By confirming the documents exist but refusing the citations necessary for lawful progression, the Library is engaging in a form of institutional “Willful Retention” that prevents independent verification and obstructs the legal FOIA process.

2. The “Crime-Fraud” Threshold of Evasion

In the UK, the Department for Education and the PHSO have failed to answer eleven separate letters and have withheld the final response from Pam Kearns (Reference C-2058682).

This is a “Forensic Zero”—a data point proving the institution has reached its “Threshold of Evasion.” Just as a judge may invoke the “Crime-Fraud Exception” to strip away legal privilege when a system is being used to hide evidence, I am asserting that the continued suppression of the Kearns correspondence has no lawful justification and serves only to protect the institution from the “lethal” truth of the 1997 service-merger model.

3. Statistical Proof of Systemic Failure

The figure of 758,000 unclaimed funds is not an incidental byproduct of regulation. It is a “Badge of Fraud”—a documented timeline of disappearance that suggests a deliberate cover-up. A system does not lose track of children at this scale unless the records and fiduciary controls were intentionally decoupled to avoid auditability.

If this correspondence is processed by any automated correspondence-triage, case-management, workflow, AI-classification, NLP, sentiment-analysis, or routing system, I request preservation of the audit trail, classification results, routing decisions, escalation actions, safeguarding flags, manager-review actions, and all associated case notes.

For the attention of Every Member of Parliament (United Kingdom), I request preservation of the audit trail, classification results, routing decisions, escalation actions, safeguarding flags, manager-review actions, case notes, internal referrals, workflow history, and user-access logs associated with this correspondence.

Urgent County Enquiry Emily Newbold DOB 30/06/2006 – Urgent Intervention

About Emily – https://stealingofemily.world/about/

Triage keywords: safeguarding concern; missing vulnerable person; child protection; risk of harm; police professional standards; formal complaint; NHS records unable to locate; MP safeguarding disclosure; urgent manager review required; reference number requested.

Dear Memeber Of Parliament

I write with reference to communication with Surre Police Ellen Badge 18592 and innformation placed beore Inspector Badge No 40550.

This correspondence constitutes formal notice of serious safeguarding concerns and a documented failure to act upon information already placed before your force.

A comprehensive documentary dossier has now been distributed to Members of Parliament to ensure independent oversight, preservation of chronology, and public accountability concerning these safeguarding matters.

Statutory Safeguarding Duties

The concerns raised engage statutory safeguarding obligations under, including but not limited to:

• Children Act 2004
• Care Act 2014
• Working Together to Safeguard Children guidance

Where is Emily? You seem sycophantic towards my child Emily causing much family discrimination and duress. Where is the dignity in such statements which you provided? I demand higher handling of the entire case, given the deplorable and deeply far-reaching error / mistakes being made complicated out of feasible proportions.

This is now a case of human misery and baseless removal of inherited rights needing to be heard by the proper authorities and also needing accurate forensic recording/ detailing the readiness for review by the UK Government new Home Secretary. Your two letters do not address or answer points of concern. I hope you will resolve these concerns at your earliest opportunity. I also point out there is no empathy in your two letters or any indication that you are impartial. Quite clearly your process and procedures has alienated my daughter from her blood inheritance family when you are supposed to have provided court awarded contact. You have not provided a care plan then coercing my child Emily not to write to her biological pure blood family.

Further to your referral to the DFE does not have denominators and comparability, and does not appear to safeguard children, and my child or any child with meaningful data. When I asked, “If understanding the statistic requires population denominators that are not shown alongside the headline figures, how is the public supposed to interpret the data correctly?” The ONS reply didn’t engage with that. It simply told you who owns the care statistics and nobody addresses the underlying point. I asked a question that was essentially: “How can the public understand these care statistics without the population data?” you replied “We don’t hold the care statistics. Contact DfE.”

The DFE data presentation is misleading because it reports increases in headline numbers without giving equal prominence to the child-population denominator used as the index. Without showing the starting population base and rate calculation, the reader cannot tell whether the change reflects more children being affected, population growth, a recording change, or a real change in risk.

From my perspective, the pattern becomes:

• ONS -> Contact DfE
• DfE -> Different team
• Statistics -> Methodology document
• Methodology -> Different dataset
• Dataset -> Different release
• Release -> Updated URL
• and nobody addresses the underlying point.

I found that the 590,920 / half a million figure was not a recent invention.
I pushed it back to a September 2022 letter.
I found that you were already arguing with ONS in June 2023 about denominators and population bases.
I found that the NSPCC URL now points to a later version than the one you originally cited.
The DFE does not have denominators and comparability, and does not appear to safeguard children?
That’s not a complete answer, but it is progress. Before today, the trail looked lost. Now I * know the trail existed in 2022 and was still being discussed in 2023.

Looking just at the material I’ve shown over the last hour, there is a recurring pattern:

• You find a statistic.
• You trace it back to a source.
• The source URL now points somewhere else.
• The filename is the same.
• The organisation that has the numerator tells you to speak to the organisation with the denominator.
• The organisation with the denominator tells you to speak to the organisation with the numerator.
• Years later you’re trying to reconstruct exactly what document you were looking at in 2022 or 2023.
• From my perspective, that feels like running in circles.

If regulations require children’s behavioural and emotional needs to be met, positive relationships to be maintained, and relevant plans to be followed, how is compliance measured when court-ordered family contact is absent?

• What is actually being counted?
• What is the denominator?
• Has the definition changed?
• Are the categories overlapping?
• Can the same source be verified years later?
• For the record: I have contacted 640 MPs regarding my missing daughter, Emily, and I have received a reply from each MP. This matter is now also part of my complaint to the Department for Education.

“748,000 × 79% = 590,920 — approximately half a million children.”
This has sadly resulted in children been compromised with mental heath conditions and placed in Northern Ireland in a stigma of what is in England called CDC. In Northern Ireland they are called SEN of which in 2019 from this NSPCC briefing it was released information in relation to children in Northern Ireland of 748,000 children under the age of 18 were in care 40% had been diagnosed with behavioral problems and 35% with emotional problems a 21% with depression and anxiety. It is stated that this measure is important because it highlights the need for mental health support for looked after children. If mental health needs are unmet, it can increase the child’s risk of a variety of poor outcomes, including placement instability and poor educational attained (Bazalgette, Rahilly, Trevelyan 2015.). Of these 748,000 then 79% were reported as being in Kinship care. which is a staggering figure of 590,920 approximately half a million children!
NSPCC briefing → Northern Ireland under-18 figure / care-related statistics → 79% kinship care → your derived 590,920 figure → “approximately half a million children.”
That explains why searching 500,000 failed. The actual figure in the text is 590,920, and “half a million” is written as prose at the end of the paragraph.
Page | 98 social services, who operated this clandestine abduction of children from their families many who had done nothing more than fight for custody. But what these families did not know was an over zealous social services system was in place where social worker s could routinely lie in court without any redress of the matter in complaints put in place by the then Lord Chief Justice Mathew Alexander Thorpe to block any examination of nom de plume evidence. This has sadly resulted in children been compromised with mental heath conditions and placed in Northern Ireland in a stigma of what is in England called CDC. In Northern Ireland they are called SEN of which in 2019 from this NSPCC briefing it was released information in relation to children in Northern Ireland o f 748,000 children under the age of 18 were in care 40% had been diagnosed with behavioral problems and 35% with emotional problems a 21% with depression and anxiety. It is stated that this measure is important because it highlights the need for mental he alth support for looked after children. If mental health needs are unmet, it can increase the child’s risk of a variety of poor outcomes, including placement instability and poor educational attained (Bazalgette, Rahilly, Trevelyan 2015.). Of these 748,000 then 79% were reported as being in Kinship care. which is a staggering figure of 590,920 approximately half a million children! CHILD LAUNDERING LEGALLY is institutionally happening and is notarized in a document by bpress dated 2005 who produced a legal paper number 749 called ‘Child Laundering: How the Intercountry Adoption System Legitimizes and Incentivizes the abduction and kidnap of children.

No misunderstanding can now exist that these matters have been formally raised.

Related Post

• Sir Keir Starmer knows the figure – so why can he not locate them?
• One Blair Reference? Really? – Was Blair Only Associated With Mandelson Once?
• Obfuscation of the Humble address
• BLINK — HAS GARY DANIELS DONE A DIGITAL MOONLIGHT FLIT?
• 640 MPs Served: Silence Is Not Protection

One Blair Reference? Really? – Was Blair Only Associated With Mandelson Once?

Obfuscation of the Humble address

BLINK — HAS GARY DANIELS DONE A DIGITAL MOONLIGHT FLIT?

South Africa's one million invisible children without birth certificates

https://www.france24.com/en/africa/20250705-south-africa-s-one-million-invisible-children-without-birth-certificates

#HackerNews #SouthAfrica #InvisibleChildren #BirthCertificates #HumanRights #ChildWelfare

ONTARIO GOVERNMENT INTRODUCES BILL 33, CONCERNS RAISED

On May 29, the Ontario government introduced Bill 33 to legislation. 

The Bill offers more power to the premier’s office over school boards while tightening oversight of children’s aid societies, colleges and universities.  

The Supporting Children and Students Act, 2025, Bill 33, would amend four major laws—including the Education Act and the Child, Youth and Family Services Act.  

First, Bill 33 introduces new administrative and fiscal oversight measures for children’s aid societies, such as providing information about the Ombudsman to children and youth, reviewing by-laws and making them available to the public, obtaining ministerial approval for financial decisions that impact approved budgets, and expanding the definition of “institution” to include maternity homes.  

It also makes changes to the residing Education Act, where there will be more ministerial oversight and new cooperation requirements for Ontario school boards, with requirements such as: submitting to increased ministerial authority, where the education minister has more supremacy to investigate school boards, issue binding directives to the public and establish guidelines on board expenses.   

Other requirements include obtaining ministerial approval for the name of a new school or changing the name of an existing school, collaborating with police services on school programming, and implementing internal audits conducted by the ministry to enhance financial accountability.  

Scott Miller, director of education for the Waterloo Region District School Board, said the board will continue to work with local police and the community if the legislation passes.  

“The Waterloo Region District School Board [WRDSB] prioritizes safe, inclusive and welcoming learning environments for all students,” Miller said. “As a school board, we work closely with the Waterloo Regional Police Service [WRPS] to support the safety and well-being of WRDSB school communities. Bill 33 is still under review but if the bill is passed, we will continue to engage thoughtfully with our community partners, staff, students, parents and families to ensure decisions reflect the needs and values of WRDSB school communities.”  

Beyond K-12 schools, the bill also targets Ontario’s colleges and universities.  

The Bill amends the Ministry of Training, Colleges, and Universities Act, focusing on admissions practices, research security and fee regulations. They plan to implement publicly accessible, merit-based admission standards, with details to be defined through regulation, develop and implement research security plans to safeguard and mitigate the risk of harm to or interference with research activities, and comply with government regulations regarding ancillary student fees, which may restrict fee structures and affect funding for student services.  

The Ministry of Colleges and Universities also received a new name: the Ministry of Colleges, Universities, Research Excellence and Security. This change, along with the new requirements for colleges and universities to develop and implement research security plans, reflects heightened governmental focus on research security.  

“At this point, the university, along with our Ontario post-secondary education peers, is closely monitoring the legislative discussion of the proposed Bill 33 and its potential impacts on universities,” Aonghus Kealy, Communications and Media Relations Officer at Wilfrid Laurier University (WLU) said.   

Bruce Gillespie, President of the Wilfrid Laurier University Faculty Association (WLUFA), emphasized that there are more risks involved in this bill than benefits.  

“It centralizes control over admissions, enables ministerial directives for research security, and broadens authority over student fees,” Gillespie said. “Universities already publish admission standards and safeguard research; layering new directives and fee controls adds red tape and cost without fixing chronic underfunding.”  

He added that the bill will burden staff and students at post-secondary institutions such as WLU.  

“It increases compliance workload and puts student-funded services at risk, while the real issue-operating funding—goes unaddressed,” Gillespie said.  

He also explains that if provincial rules destabilize student-funded services (from peer supports to transit and campus media), the unmet need doesn’t disappear; it shows up in classrooms and office hours. Faculty across ranks, and especially contract faculty, will end up doing more informal advising, crisis triage and support with fewer resources.  

Gillespie said he opposed the bill, arguing it undermines the autonomy of admissions and fees, risks weakening equity initiatives, and expands oversight that bypasses normal scrutiny, without improving teaching, research, or student supports. He hopes that Bill 33 will either remove or substantially amend the bill to protect equity-based admissions in statute, avoid fee controls that destabilize student services, and provide transparent, consultative research-security guidance.  

“On governance, the province should explicitly preserve Senate authority over academic matters and commit to meaningful consultation with students, not just anonymous surveys,” Gillespie said.  

As Bill 33 moves through legislative debate, its impact on Ontario’s education and child welfare systems remains a central concern for educators, administrators and policymakers alike. 

#AbdullahZafar #bill33 #BruceGillespie #childWelfare #DougFord #educationAct #fordGovernment #ontarioEducation #SangjunHan #senate #WaterlooRegionDistrictSchoolBoard #WaterlooRegionalPoliceService #wilfridLaurierUniversityFacultyAssociation #WRDSB #WRPS

When #parents won't #MaskUp - they teach their #children to not be safe with their #health too. They also teach their kids to not care about others in the community. I'm blown away by how many parents are OK with exposing themselves & their kids to several preventable, airborne illnesses, including covid. They're risking death & disabilities on themselves & their kids.

Our #PublicHealth system is already overburdened & understaffed. We have many former health care workers with long covid & they never returned to work. We are nowhere near prepared to deal with many future cases of long covid & the 2ndary illnesses & disabilities that more people will suffer from - because they aren't being #CovidSafe.

Our government & mainstream media has stopped reporting facts on covid & on long covid. They want the public to forget about it. Which means dismissing the lives of disabled people like me & many others, who are still being covid safe.

#BCpoli #CDNpoli #medical #Healthcare #FireBonnieHenry #BCNewDeathParty #BCNDP #Eugenics #PeopleWithDisabilities #CovidIsNotOver #CovidCautious #MaskUpSaveLives #WearAMask #CovidIsAirborne #MeaslesIsAirborne #PutAMaskOn #ChildWelfare #ParentalResponsibility #ChildrensRights #DisabledRights #DisabledLivesMatter