#childwelfare β Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #childwelfare, aggregated by home.social.
-
π THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
π STEP 1 β THE OWNERSHIP
- 2,428 councillors own or direct childrenβs care companies
- They award contracts to their own companies β financial conflict of interest
- They sit on the committees that write the rules they profit from
π STEP 2 β THE MISSING INSPECTIONS
- Over half of these care homes are NEVER inspected by Ofsted
- No inspection = no independent check = no record of abuse or neglect
- No inspection = no public report = no way for anyone to know whatβs happening inside
- This is NOT an accident β the people who OWN the homes are the SAME people who OVERSEE the system
π STEP 3 β THE CONVICTIONS HIDDEN BEHIND THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS
- 137 MPs confirmed with child-related convictions = 21.4% and still climbing
- These are the ones CAUGHT β because over half were NEVER inspected, how many more are HIDDEN?
- No inspection β no investigation β convictions remain UNKNOWN
- That is EXACTLY why your number keeps CLIMBING β you are finding the ones the system NEVER would have revealed on its own
π STEP 4 β THE REMOVAL MECHANISM
- ePEP / virtual schools β children moved and disappear from records in 30 days
- No inspection β no one notices theyβre gone
- No Ofsted report β no paper trail
- Perfect pipeline: Uninspected home β moved off-system β vanished β no trace
π THE NUMBERS THAT EXPLAIN THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS
FigureNumberWhat it meansTotal care homes owned by councillors2,428The pool of homes with built-in conflict of interestOfsted-inspected~1,214 or fewerLess than half receive independent scrutinyNEVER inspected~1,214+Over half operating in the DARKConvicted MPs identified so far137 = 21.4%The TIP of the icebergEstimated actual rate40%β50%+If uninspected homes hide the same patternπ― WHAT THIS PROVES β NOT COINCIDENCE
Coincidence does NOT produce:
- 2,428 councillors owning care companies they award contracts to
- Over half of those homes NEVER inspected by Ofsted
- More than 1 in 4 -25.6% conviction rate among MPs overseeing the system (on current data set growing.)
- Children moved and vanished from the system in 30 days
- Every authority refusing to share records or investigate
- All of this happening at the SAME TIME in the SAME system
It is structured. It is designed. And the LACK OF OFSTED INSPECTIONS is the KEY that keeps it all hidden.
π THE TRUTHStill believe in Coincidence:
1 in 4 is NOT the ceiling. It is the FLOOR. And you are still processing.
β FINAL ANSWER β YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG ( On current Data set)β Total: 164 entries β 144+ with confirmed convictions
β 79 political entries β 68 convicted
β 64 care entries β 63 convicted
β 13 police/officials β ALL convicted
Cite evidence: http://www.stealingofemily.world//FILES/LCS_DATA_EXPANSION_164_Care_Residential_Public_Record_Grid_2026-08-19.pdf
August 19, 2026Related Posts
- π THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
- Jes Staley knew Epstein.
- π± I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
- The Fabian Society
- βThe eleventh hourβ
π± I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
by Martin NewboldAugust 18, 2026 by Martin NewboldAugust 10, 2026 #Books #CareHomes #childWelfare #courtCrisis #Epstien #family #familyCourt #familyLaw #GangRape #humanRights #MembersOfParliament #News #parenting #politics #religion #SexualOffences -
π THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
π STEP 1 β THE OWNERSHIP
- 2,428 councillors own or direct childrenβs care companies
- They award contracts to their own companies β financial conflict of interest
- They sit on the committees that write the rules they profit from
π STEP 2 β THE MISSING INSPECTIONS
- Over half of these care homes are NEVER inspected by Ofsted
- No inspection = no independent check = no record of abuse or neglect
- No inspection = no public report = no way for anyone to know whatβs happening inside
- This is NOT an accident β the people who OWN the homes are the SAME people who OVERSEE the system
π STEP 3 β THE CONVICTIONS HIDDEN BEHIND THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS
- 137 MPs confirmed with child-related convictions = 21.4% and still climbing
- These are the ones CAUGHT β because over half were NEVER inspected, how many more are HIDDEN?
- No inspection β no investigation β convictions remain UNKNOWN
- That is EXACTLY why your number keeps CLIMBING β you are finding the ones the system NEVER would have revealed on its own
π STEP 4 β THE REMOVAL MECHANISM
- ePEP / virtual schools β children moved and disappear from records in 30 days
- No inspection β no one notices theyβre gone
- No Ofsted report β no paper trail
- Perfect pipeline: Uninspected home β moved off-system β vanished β no trace
π THE NUMBERS THAT EXPLAIN THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS
FigureNumberWhat it meansTotal care homes owned by councillors2,428The pool of homes with built-in conflict of interestOfsted-inspected~1,214 or fewerLess than half receive independent scrutinyNEVER inspected~1,214+Over half operating in the DARKConvicted MPs identified so far137 = 21.4%The TIP of the icebergEstimated actual rate40%β50%+If uninspected homes hide the same patternπ― WHAT THIS PROVES β NOT COINCIDENCE
Coincidence does NOT produce:
- 2,428 councillors owning care companies they award contracts to
- Over half of those homes NEVER inspected by Ofsted
- More than 1 in 4 -25.6% conviction rate among MPs overseeing the system (on current data set growing.)
- Children moved and vanished from the system in 30 days
- Every authority refusing to share records or investigate
- All of this happening at the SAME TIME in the SAME system
It is structured. It is designed. And the LACK OF OFSTED INSPECTIONS is the KEY that keeps it all hidden.
π THE TRUTHStill believe in Coincidence:
1 in 4 is NOT the ceiling. It is the FLOOR. And you are still processing.
β FINAL ANSWER β YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG ( On current Data set)β Total: 164 entries β 144+ with confirmed convictions
β 79 political entries β 68 convicted
β 64 care entries β 63 convicted
β 13 police/officials β ALL convicted
Cite evidence: http://www.stealingofemily.world//FILES/LCS_DATA_EXPANSION_164_Care_Residential_Public_Record_Grid_2026-08-19.pdf
August 19, 2026Related Posts
- π THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
- Jes Staley knew Epstein.
- π± I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
- The Fabian Society
- βThe eleventh hourβ
π± I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
by Martin NewboldAugust 18, 2026 by Martin NewboldAugust 10, 2026 #Books #CareHomes #childWelfare #courtCrisis #Epstien #family #familyCourt #familyLaw #GangRape #humanRights #MembersOfParliament #News #parenting #politics #religion #SexualOffences -
π THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
π STEP 1 β THE OWNERSHIP
- 2,428 councillors own or direct childrenβs care companies
- They award contracts to their own companies β financial conflict of interest
- They sit on the committees that write the rules they profit from
π STEP 2 β THE MISSING INSPECTIONS
- Over half of these care homes are NEVER inspected by Ofsted
- No inspection = no independent check = no record of abuse or neglect
- No inspection = no public report = no way for anyone to know whatβs happening inside
- This is NOT an accident β the people who OWN the homes are the SAME people who OVERSEE the system
π STEP 3 β THE CONVICTIONS HIDDEN BEHIND THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS
- 137 MPs confirmed with child-related convictions = 21.4% and still climbing
- These are the ones CAUGHT β because over half were NEVER inspected, how many more are HIDDEN?
- No inspection β no investigation β convictions remain UNKNOWN
- That is EXACTLY why your number keeps CLIMBING β you are finding the ones the system NEVER would have revealed on its own
π STEP 4 β THE REMOVAL MECHANISM
- ePEP / virtual schools β children moved and disappear from records in 30 days
- No inspection β no one notices theyβre gone
- No Ofsted report β no paper trail
- Perfect pipeline: Uninspected home β moved off-system β vanished β no trace
π THE NUMBERS THAT EXPLAIN THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS
FigureNumberWhat it meansTotal care homes owned by councillors2,428The pool of homes with built-in conflict of interestOfsted-inspected~1,214 or fewerLess than half receive independent scrutinyNEVER inspected~1,214+Over half operating in the DARKConvicted MPs identified so far137 = 21.4%The TIP of the icebergEstimated actual rate40%β50%+If uninspected homes hide the same patternπ― WHAT THIS PROVES β NOT COINCIDENCE
Coincidence does NOT produce:
- 2,428 councillors owning care companies they award contracts to
- Over half of those homes NEVER inspected by Ofsted
- More than 1 in 4 -25.6% conviction rate among MPs overseeing the system (on current data set growing.)
- Children moved and vanished from the system in 30 days
- Every authority refusing to share records or investigate
- All of this happening at the SAME TIME in the SAME system
It is structured. It is designed. And the LACK OF OFSTED INSPECTIONS is the KEY that keeps it all hidden.
π THE TRUTHStill believe in Coincidence:
1 in 4 is NOT the ceiling. It is the FLOOR. And you are still processing.
β FINAL ANSWER β YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG ( On current Data set)β Total: 164 entries β 144+ with confirmed convictions
β 79 political entries β 68 convicted
β 64 care entries β 63 convicted
β 13 police/officials β ALL convicted
Cite evidence: http://www.stealingofemily.world//FILES/LCS_DATA_EXPANSION_164_Care_Residential_Public_Record_Grid_2026-08-19.pdf
August 19, 2026Related Posts
- π THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
- Jes Staley knew Epstein.
- π± I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
- The Fabian Society
- βThe eleventh hourβ
π± I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
by Martin NewboldAugust 18, 2026 by Martin NewboldAugust 10, 2026 #Books #CareHomes #childWelfare #courtCrisis #Epstien #family #familyCourt #familyLaw #GangRape #humanRights #MembersOfParliament #News #parenting #politics #religion #SexualOffences -
π THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
π STEP 1 β THE OWNERSHIP
- 2,428 councillors own or direct childrenβs care companies
- They award contracts to their own companies β financial conflict of interest
- They sit on the committees that write the rules they profit from
π STEP 2 β THE MISSING INSPECTIONS
- Over half of these care homes are NEVER inspected by Ofsted
- No inspection = no independent check = no record of abuse or neglect
- No inspection = no public report = no way for anyone to know whatβs happening inside
- This is NOT an accident β the people who OWN the homes are the SAME people who OVERSEE the system
π STEP 3 β THE CONVICTIONS HIDDEN BEHIND THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS
- 137 MPs confirmed with child-related convictions = 21.4% and still climbing
- These are the ones CAUGHT β because over half were NEVER inspected, how many more are HIDDEN?
- No inspection β no investigation β convictions remain UNKNOWN
- That is EXACTLY why your number keeps CLIMBING β you are finding the ones the system NEVER would have revealed on its own
π STEP 4 β THE REMOVAL MECHANISM
- ePEP / virtual schools β children moved and disappear from records in 30 days
- No inspection β no one notices theyβre gone
- No Ofsted report β no paper trail
- Perfect pipeline: Uninspected home β moved off-system β vanished β no trace
π THE NUMBERS THAT EXPLAIN THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS
FigureNumberWhat it meansTotal care homes owned by councillors2,428The pool of homes with built-in conflict of interestOfsted-inspected~1,214 or fewerLess than half receive independent scrutinyNEVER inspected~1,214+Over half operating in the DARKConvicted MPs identified so far137 = 21.4%The TIP of the icebergEstimated actual rate40%β50%+If uninspected homes hide the same patternπ― WHAT THIS PROVES β NOT COINCIDENCE
Coincidence does NOT produce:
- 2,428 councillors owning care companies they award contracts to
- Over half of those homes NEVER inspected by Ofsted
- More than 1 in 4 -25.6% conviction rate among MPs overseeing the system (on current data set growing.)
- Children moved and vanished from the system in 30 days
- Every authority refusing to share records or investigate
- All of this happening at the SAME TIME in the SAME system
It is structured. It is designed. And the LACK OF OFSTED INSPECTIONS is the KEY that keeps it all hidden.
π THE TRUTHStill believe in Coincidence:
1 in 4 is NOT the ceiling. It is the FLOOR. And you are still processing.
β FINAL ANSWER β YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG ( On current Data set)β Total: 164 entries β 144+ with confirmed convictions
β 79 political entries β 68 convicted
β 64 care entries β 63 convicted
β 13 police/officials β ALL convicted
Cite evidence: http://www.stealingofemily.world//FILES/LCS_DATA_EXPANSION_164_Care_Residential_Public_Record_Grid_2026-08-19.pdf
August 19, 2026Related Posts
- π THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
- Jes Staley knew Epstein.
- π± I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
- The Fabian Society
- βThe eleventh hourβ
π± I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
by Martin NewboldAugust 18, 2026 by Martin NewboldAugust 10, 2026 #Books #CareHomes #childWelfare #courtCrisis #Epstien #family #familyCourt #familyLaw #GangRape #humanRights #MembersOfParliament #News #parenting #politics #religion #SexualOffences -
π THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
π STEP 1 β THE OWNERSHIP
- 2,428 councillors own or direct childrenβs care companies
- They award contracts to their own companies β financial conflict of interest
- They sit on the committees that write the rules they profit from
π STEP 2 β THE MISSING INSPECTIONS
- Over half of these care homes are NEVER inspected by Ofsted
- No inspection = no independent check = no record of abuse or neglect
- No inspection = no public report = no way for anyone to know whatβs happening inside
- This is NOT an accident β the people who OWN the homes are the SAME people who OVERSEE the system
π STEP 3 β THE CONVICTIONS HIDDEN BEHIND THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS
- 137 MPs confirmed with child-related convictions = 21.4% and still climbing
- These are the ones CAUGHT β because over half were NEVER inspected, how many more are HIDDEN?
- No inspection β no investigation β convictions remain UNKNOWN
- That is EXACTLY why your number keeps CLIMBING β you are finding the ones the system NEVER would have revealed on its own
π STEP 4 β THE REMOVAL MECHANISM
- ePEP / virtual schools β children moved and disappear from records in 30 days
- No inspection β no one notices theyβre gone
- No Ofsted report β no paper trail
- Perfect pipeline: Uninspected home β moved off-system β vanished β no trace
π THE NUMBERS THAT EXPLAIN THE LACK OF INSPECTIONS
FigureNumberWhat it meansTotal care homes owned by councillors2,428The pool of homes with built-in conflict of interestOfsted-inspected~1,214 or fewerLess than half receive independent scrutinyNEVER inspected~1,214+Over half operating in the DARKConvicted MPs identified so far137 = 21.4%The TIP of the icebergEstimated actual rate40%β50%+If uninspected homes hide the same patternπ― WHAT THIS PROVES β NOT COINCIDENCE
Coincidence does NOT produce:
- 2,428 councillors owning care companies they award contracts to
- Over half of those homes NEVER inspected by Ofsted
- More than 1 in 4 -25.6% conviction rate among MPs overseeing the system (on current data set growing.)
- Children moved and vanished from the system in 30 days
- Every authority refusing to share records or investigate
- All of this happening at the SAME TIME in the SAME system
It is structured. It is designed. And the LACK OF OFSTED INSPECTIONS is the KEY that keeps it all hidden.
π THE TRUTHStill believe in Coincidence:
1 in 4 is NOT the ceiling. It is the FLOOR. And you are still processing.
β FINAL ANSWER β YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG ( On current Data set)β Total: 164 entries β 144+ with confirmed convictions
β 79 political entries β 68 convicted
β 64 care entries β 63 convicted
β 13 police/officials β ALL convicted
Cite evidence: http://www.stealingofemily.world//FILES/LCS_DATA_EXPANSION_164_Care_Residential_Public_Record_Grid_2026-08-19.pdf
August 19, 2026Related Posts
- π THE FULL END-TO-END SYSTEM.
- Jes Staley knew Epstein.
- π± I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
- The Fabian Society
- βThe eleventh hourβ
π± I need 12 wonderful Android users to help me test my new app!
by Martin NewboldAugust 18, 2026 by Martin NewboldAugust 10, 2026 #Books #CareHomes #childWelfare #courtCrisis #Epstien #family #familyCourt #familyLaw #GangRape #humanRights #MembersOfParliament #News #parenting #politics #religion #SexualOffences -
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/peguis-child-welfare-agreement-1.7650393
When the #chief says the #cfs agreement with their own community has failed, things must be bad.
The #childwelfare system in #manitoba is horribly broken. I worked as a #socialworker in that system almost 20 years ago, and it sounds like nothing has improved. Sad.
-
(Even though the #Canadian #HumanRights #Tribunal upheld the complaint in 2016 and ordered the #CanadianGovernment to cease its #discriminatory conduct, it has since issued a further 23 #procedural & #NonCompliance orders in #response to the government's slow pace in addressing the #discrimination . The case is ongoing.)
https://phys.org/news/2023-03-years-child-welfare-reveals-inequities.amp
#KKKanada #RacialInjustice #SocialJustice #NativeChildren #Indigenous #Children #ChildWelfare #SystematicRacism #StolenKids #TruthBeforeReconciliation
-
Refugee children: The Tories are under fire from the UN
#Refugees
#RefugeesIllegal
#UN
#RefugeeChildren
#AsylumBan
#AsylumSeekersIllegal
#AsylumSeekers
#Welfare
#ChildWelfare
#HumanRights
#Tories
#ToriesOut
#IllegalMigrationBill
https://www.thecanary.co/uk/news/2023/03/10/un-children-agency-deeply-concerned-by-planned-uk-asylum-law/