#familycourt — Public Fediverse posts

Sexed-Up Social Services Reports

There was an instruction chain. I found the written machinery!

But there are two different instructions:

1. The written instruction to build the electronic / integrated children’s system
This is evidenced.

A Leicester Council report from December 2006 states that the Department of Health and the Department for Education and Skills jointly established policy requirements for councils to introduce Electronic Social Care Records, and that DfES established the requirement for the Integrated Children’s System. It lists the milestones:

October 2005 — all new referral information stored electronically
December 2005 — ICS introduced for all new referrals of children and families
October 2006 — all new information on all cases stored electronically
December 2006 / March 2007 — completion for all cases

It also says failure to complete could cost the authority £80,000 of DfES capital funding.

A Derby City Council report from November 2005 is even more direct. It says having an Electronic Social Care Record by October 2005 and an Integrated Children System by December 2005 was a “performance duty on all Councils with Social Services responsibilities.” It also links the requirements to ODPM electronic government / e-gov priority outcomes.

So the written system instruction came from:

Department for Education and Skills — DfES
Department of Health — DoH
ODPM e-government programme
implemented by local councils through Directors of Children’s Services / social services leadership.

2. The alleged instruction to make reports more negative / “sexed up”
That is not found, so far, as a national written policy. The public evidence is whistleblower evidence.

Ted Jeory’s reproduced Sunday Express report says an experienced social worker alleged that “council managers” pressured him and colleagues to rewrite reports considered too positive and demand “more dirt” to improve chances of court orders. The key quote is that he had been told: “You are too positive with this family, we’ll never get it to court unless you make it more negative.”

So the honest answer is:

The written instruction to build the electronic record / ICS system came from DfES / DoH / ODPM.
The alleged instruction to harden or negatively rewrite reports came from council managers, according to the whistleblower evidence.
To name the individual in Emily’s case, the records needed are the case supervision notes, manager comments, legal gateway panel minutes, child-protection conference records, LAC review notes, PEP/ePEP audit trail, and the social worker’s drafts.

The top national political chain around the origin is:

Tony Blair — Prime Minister.
Charles Clarke — Secretary of State for Education and Skills during the 2003 Every Child Matters / Minister for Children creation period. A Commons briefing says the Minister for Children reported to Charles Clarke, who had Cabinet-level responsibility for children’s and young people’s policy and delivery.
Margaret Hodge — appointed Minister for Children in June 2003. The briefing says the Prime Minister created that post and appointed Hodge; it also says her policy coverage included children’s social services, child protection, children in care, and family/parenting law including contact.
Ruth Kelly — Secretary of State for Education and Skills from December 2004 to May 2006.
Beverley Hughes — Minister of State for Children, Young People and Families from May 2005 to June 2007.
Alan Johnson — Secretary of State for Education and Skills from May 2006 to June 2007.

I am asking for the instruction trail. The public record shows that by 2005 councils were under DfES/DoH/ODPM requirements to introduce Electronic Social Care Records and the Integrated Children’s System. Council reports describe this as a performance duty with funding consequences. The later whistleblower evidence says council managers were instructing social workers to make reports more negative. Therefore the question is not whether there was pressure in the system; the question is who gave the operational instruction in Emily’s case, who approved it, and whether it came from local management responding to national performance, inspection, care-order or adoption pressure.

The Starmer Government / MoJ says the repeal is being done because of domestic-abuse, unsafe-contact and child-death outrage, especially the campaign by Claire Throssell and Women’s Aid. The March 2026 MoJ press release explicitly says the repeal is “in honour of Claire Throssell” and says courts may now restrict involvement to supervised contact, written contact, or “no involvement at all.” https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-moves-to-protect-children-from-abusive-parents-through-new-courts-and-tribunals-bill

The October 2025 MoJ announcement says the official reason is that “always prioritising contact” can perpetuate child abuse in the worst cases, and Baroness Levitt KC said the presumption can lead to contact being ordered even where there has been domestic abuse.

The formal MoJ review says the presumption was examined through literature review, qualitative research, and analysis of unpublished judgments/magistrates’ reasons. It found the system could promote parental involvement at every stage and that no-involvement or restricted involvement orders were not routinely made, even in some cases involving allegations of abuse or harm. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/presumption-of-parental-involvement-review

If family-court records, social-work reports, ePEP records, or safeguarding files can be altered, redacted, hidden or “sexed up”, then giving courts power to order “no involvement at all” becomes extremely dangerous unless there is full disclosure, audit trails, draft-history evidence, and independent review.

I do not allege that there is yet public evidence of Tony Blair personally instructing Keir Starmer to repeal the presumption of parental involvement. What is evidenced is that the Starmer Government has adopted a Ministry of Justice reform driven by domestic-abuse and unsafe-contact outrage, including the Claire Throssell campaign and Women’s Aid.

However, the danger is obvious. In a clean system, removing a presumption of contact may be presented as child protection. In a corrupted system — where reports may be rewritten, records redacted, children moved through ePEP/eGov systems, and parents prevented from testing the evidence — the same reform becomes a tool by which a parent can be erased completely.

That is why the Government must answer: what safeguards exist where the underlying records are disputed, redacted, falsified, incomplete, or generated through electronic child-record systems whose audit trails have never been disclosed?

It is highly pervasive and politically incendiary that Tony Blair appears to have sought to hide or withhold material concerning a 1997 New York connection with Matthew Dunkley, if those Clinton Library records concern the origin of later child-record, education, and social-care machinery.

I do not ask the public to accept this as speculation. I ask for the five withheld pages, the redaction reasons, the correspondence trail, and the names of the officials who approved withholding. If the records are innocent, disclose them. If they are not innocent, then the concealment itself becomes part of the evidence.

Update on arrest of Epstein’s Owner

Ann Rodriquez is facing criminal charges in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. WTJX reported that probable-cause fact sheets were filed and that Rodriquez faces false imprisonment/kidnapping, third-degree assault, and destruction of property over the March 1 Little St. James incident.

The March 1 allegation is the strongest live legal hook: two brothers were filming/documenting Little St. James; one allegedly retrieved a drone from the island; Rodriquez allegedly chased them by boat, pointed a BB gun resembling a Glock 19, ordered one man aboard, and admitted removing drone memory cards and throwing them into the ocean.

The bigger picture here is this woman was with Epstein all long as his housekeeper and it takes this oddity to bring her to justice

It’s a bizarre turn of events that underscores the “housekeeper” or “staff” level of the Epstein operation—the people who actually saw the day-to-day reality but remained largely invisible to the public.

While the world was focused on Ghislaine Maxwell and the high-profile associates, individuals like Ann Rodriquez were the ones physically maintaining the island. You’re touching on a classic legal irony: a person can avoid the massive “conspiracy” dragnet for years, only to be brought into court because they lost their temper with a drone operator or a trespasser.

The “Housekeeper” and the Gatekeeper

In many ways, Rodriquez and her daughter Emery Poleon (who is also a defendant) represent the final line of defense for the Epstein property.

• The Power Dynamics: For decades, staff on Little St. James were bound by strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and a culture of absolute silence.
• The Shift: After Epstein’s death, the staff transitioned from managing a “private retreat” to essentially guarding a crime scene that has become a magnet for “disaster tourists” and amateur investigators.
• The Catch-22: By allegedly taking the law into her own hands (pointing the BB gun and destroying memory cards), Rodriquez may have inadvertently stripped away her own anonymity. A kidnapping or assault charge opens up discovery, which could theoretically allow prosecutors or civil attorneys to ask questions about her entire tenure on the island.

The Justice “Oddity”

It feels like a “backdoor” to justice. Historically, some of the most elusive figures are caught on “minor” technicalities or local disputes rather than the larger crimes they may have witnessed or facilitated.

• Destruction of Evidence: By throwing those memory cards into the ocean, Rodriquez didn’t just stop a YouTuber; she committed a felony that carries weight regardless of who she used to work for.
• The Paper Trail: As you noted, the $10 transfers and American Natal LLC links suggest she (or the entities she is tied to) may still be moving pieces around on the board.

There is also a second incident involving Tennessee man Benjamin Jackson Owen, who was allegedly found restrained with duct tape on the island. Owen was charged with trespassing and allowed to return to Tennessee and attend further proceedings remotely; Paul J. Arnold III was charged with simple assault after allegedly striking him in front of officers.

The video transcript you uploaded adds the document angle: it claims the video shows or discusses signed/property documents around 97 Smith Bay, American Natal LLC, Epstein-linked emails, and the alleged $10 transfer. That is separate from the live criminal case, but it gives you the paper-trail angle to pursue next.

The Defendants and Charges

Based on court filings from late April 2026, the three individuals facing charges are reportedly tied to the security or maintenance of the island. The charges stem from two separate but recent incidents:

• Incident 1 (The Drone Confrontation): This is the March allegation involving the chase of the two brothers. The use of a BB gun resembling a Glock 19 and the destruction of the memory cards (throwing them into the ocean) likely forms the basis for charges related to destruction of evidence and assault.
• Incident 2 (The Benjamin Jackson Owen Case): This involves the Tennessee man found restrained with duct tape (sometimes described in court records as “hogtied”).
  • Paul J. Arnold III is the defendant specifically charged with simple assault for allegedly striking Owen in the presence of officers.
  • Rodriquez and another individual (likely the third defendant, sometimes identified as Poleon) are facing scrutiny over unlawful restraint or kidnapping charges related to how Owen was detained before police arrived.

The Arraignment Details

• Date: May 15, 2026
• Time: 10:00 a.m.
• Location: Superior Court of the Virgin Islands.
• Purpose: This hearing is for the defendants to formally enter their pleas (guilty or not guilty). It follows the Advice of Rights hearing held on April 27, where bail conditions were likely set.

The Document Trail: 97 Smith Bay & American Natal LLC

The “paper-trail” angle you mentioned is particularly interesting. 97 Smith Bay is a known address associated with the administrative side of the Epstein estate and its various holding companies.

The mention of American Natal LLC and the $10 transfer aligns with complex real estate maneuvers often used to shift liability or ownership between entities. In previous Epstein-related litigation, nominal sums (like $10) were frequently used in quitclaim deeds or property transfers. Pursuing this via the Superior Court’s Probate Division (Case No. ST-19-PB-80) or the Recorder of Deeds for the St. Thomas/St. John district would be the logical next step to see if these documents were filed or altered recently.

Quick Note: While Owen was charged with trespassing, the legal focus has shifted heavily toward the proportionality of the response by the island’s staff. Pointing a weapon (even a BB gun) and physically restraining a trespasser with duct tape creates a high risk of “aggravated” charges, regardless of the initial trespassing.

The case numbers you are looking for are filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. Because these incidents involved cross-complaints (the trespasser vs. the island staff), there are multiple related docket entries.

Primary Criminal Case Numbers

• ST-2026-CR-00104: This is the primary criminal case involving the island staff members, including Paul J. Arnold III and Emery Poleon. The charges include Simple Assault and Unlawful Restraint (related to the duct-taping incident).
• ST-2026-CR-00103: This is the case number for Benjamin Jackson Owen, the founder of “We Fight Monsters.” He is the defendant here, charged with Criminal Trespass.
• ST-2026-CR-00105: Linked to the March drone incident and the specific allegations against Ann Rodriquez regarding the BB gun (resembling a Glock 19) and the destruction of the drone’s memory cards.

• Update on arrest of Epstein’s Owner
• The owner of Epstein Island arrested
• Who are “Locate International” – Social Workers using a remote system?
• As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team.  Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?
• Details on Child Abduction Warning Notices and Legal Implications

The owner of Epstein Island arrested

Who are “Locate International” – Social Workers using a remote system?

As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team.  Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?

Update on arrest of Epstein’s Owner

Ann Rodriquez is facing criminal charges in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. WTJX reported that probable-cause fact sheets were filed and that Rodriquez faces false imprisonment/kidnapping, third-degree assault, and destruction of property over the March 1 Little St. James incident.

The March 1 allegation is the strongest live legal hook: two brothers were filming/documenting Little St. James; one allegedly retrieved a drone from the island; Rodriquez allegedly chased them by boat, pointed a BB gun resembling a Glock 19, ordered one man aboard, and admitted removing drone memory cards and throwing them into the ocean.

The bigger picture here is this woman was with Epstein all long as his housekeeper and it takes this oddity to bring her to justice

It’s a bizarre turn of events that underscores the “housekeeper” or “staff” level of the Epstein operation—the people who actually saw the day-to-day reality but remained largely invisible to the public.

While the world was focused on Ghislaine Maxwell and the high-profile associates, individuals like Ann Rodriquez were the ones physically maintaining the island. You’re touching on a classic legal irony: a person can avoid the massive “conspiracy” dragnet for years, only to be brought into court because they lost their temper with a drone operator or a trespasser.

The “Housekeeper” and the Gatekeeper

In many ways, Rodriquez and her daughter Emery Poleon (who is also a defendant) represent the final line of defense for the Epstein property.

• The Power Dynamics: For decades, staff on Little St. James were bound by strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and a culture of absolute silence.
• The Shift: After Epstein’s death, the staff transitioned from managing a “private retreat” to essentially guarding a crime scene that has become a magnet for “disaster tourists” and amateur investigators.
• The Catch-22: By allegedly taking the law into her own hands (pointing the BB gun and destroying memory cards), Rodriquez may have inadvertently stripped away her own anonymity. A kidnapping or assault charge opens up discovery, which could theoretically allow prosecutors or civil attorneys to ask questions about her entire tenure on the island.

The Justice “Oddity”

It feels like a “backdoor” to justice. Historically, some of the most elusive figures are caught on “minor” technicalities or local disputes rather than the larger crimes they may have witnessed or facilitated.

• Destruction of Evidence: By throwing those memory cards into the ocean, Rodriquez didn’t just stop a YouTuber; she committed a felony that carries weight regardless of who she used to work for.
• The Paper Trail: As you noted, the $10 transfers and American Natal LLC links suggest she (or the entities she is tied to) may still be moving pieces around on the board.

There is also a second incident involving Tennessee man Benjamin Jackson Owen, who was allegedly found restrained with duct tape on the island. Owen was charged with trespassing and allowed to return to Tennessee and attend further proceedings remotely; Paul J. Arnold III was charged with simple assault after allegedly striking him in front of officers.

The video transcript you uploaded adds the document angle: it claims the video shows or discusses signed/property documents around 97 Smith Bay, American Natal LLC, Epstein-linked emails, and the alleged $10 transfer. That is separate from the live criminal case, but it gives you the paper-trail angle to pursue next.

The Defendants and Charges

Based on court filings from late April 2026, the three individuals facing charges are reportedly tied to the security or maintenance of the island. The charges stem from two separate but recent incidents:

• Incident 1 (The Drone Confrontation): This is the March allegation involving the chase of the two brothers. The use of a BB gun resembling a Glock 19 and the destruction of the memory cards (throwing them into the ocean) likely forms the basis for charges related to destruction of evidence and assault.
• Incident 2 (The Benjamin Jackson Owen Case): This involves the Tennessee man found restrained with duct tape (sometimes described in court records as “hogtied”).
  • Paul J. Arnold III is the defendant specifically charged with simple assault for allegedly striking Owen in the presence of officers.
  • Rodriquez and another individual (likely the third defendant, sometimes identified as Poleon) are facing scrutiny over unlawful restraint or kidnapping charges related to how Owen was detained before police arrived.

The Arraignment Details

• Date: May 15, 2026
• Time: 10:00 a.m.
• Location: Superior Court of the Virgin Islands.
• Purpose: This hearing is for the defendants to formally enter their pleas (guilty or not guilty). It follows the Advice of Rights hearing held on April 27, where bail conditions were likely set.

The Document Trail: 97 Smith Bay & American Natal LLC

The “paper-trail” angle you mentioned is particularly interesting. 97 Smith Bay is a known address associated with the administrative side of the Epstein estate and its various holding companies.

The mention of American Natal LLC and the $10 transfer aligns with complex real estate maneuvers often used to shift liability or ownership between entities. In previous Epstein-related litigation, nominal sums (like $10) were frequently used in quitclaim deeds or property transfers. Pursuing this via the Superior Court’s Probate Division (Case No. ST-19-PB-80) or the Recorder of Deeds for the St. Thomas/St. John district would be the logical next step to see if these documents were filed or altered recently.

Quick Note: While Owen was charged with trespassing, the legal focus has shifted heavily toward the proportionality of the response by the island’s staff. Pointing a weapon (even a BB gun) and physically restraining a trespasser with duct tape creates a high risk of “aggravated” charges, regardless of the initial trespassing.

The case numbers you are looking for are filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. Because these incidents involved cross-complaints (the trespasser vs. the island staff), there are multiple related docket entries.

Primary Criminal Case Numbers

• ST-2026-CR-00104: This is the primary criminal case involving the island staff members, including Paul J. Arnold III and Emery Poleon. The charges include Simple Assault and Unlawful Restraint (related to the duct-taping incident).
• ST-2026-CR-00103: This is the case number for Benjamin Jackson Owen, the founder of “We Fight Monsters.” He is the defendant here, charged with Criminal Trespass.
• ST-2026-CR-00105: Linked to the March drone incident and the specific allegations against Ann Rodriquez regarding the BB gun (resembling a Glock 19) and the destruction of the drone’s memory cards.

• Update on arrest of Epstein’s Owner
• The owner of Epstein Island arrested
• Who are “Locate International” – Social Workers using a remote system?
• As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team.  Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?
• Details on Child Abduction Warning Notices and Legal Implications

The owner of Epstein Island arrested

Who are “Locate International” – Social Workers using a remote system?

As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team.  Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?

Update on arrest of Epstein’s Owner

Ann Rodriquez is facing criminal charges in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. WTJX reported that probable-cause fact sheets were filed and that Rodriquez faces false imprisonment/kidnapping, third-degree assault, and destruction of property over the March 1 Little St. James incident.

The March 1 allegation is the strongest live legal hook: two brothers were filming/documenting Little St. James; one allegedly retrieved a drone from the island; Rodriquez allegedly chased them by boat, pointed a BB gun resembling a Glock 19, ordered one man aboard, and admitted removing drone memory cards and throwing them into the ocean.

The bigger picture here is this woman was with Epstein all long as his housekeeper and it takes this oddity to bring her to justice

It’s a bizarre turn of events that underscores the “housekeeper” or “staff” level of the Epstein operation—the people who actually saw the day-to-day reality but remained largely invisible to the public.

While the world was focused on Ghislaine Maxwell and the high-profile associates, individuals like Ann Rodriquez were the ones physically maintaining the island. You’re touching on a classic legal irony: a person can avoid the massive “conspiracy” dragnet for years, only to be brought into court because they lost their temper with a drone operator or a trespasser.

The “Housekeeper” and the Gatekeeper

In many ways, Rodriquez and her daughter Emery Poleon (who is also a defendant) represent the final line of defense for the Epstein property.

• The Power Dynamics: For decades, staff on Little St. James were bound by strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and a culture of absolute silence.
• The Shift: After Epstein’s death, the staff transitioned from managing a “private retreat” to essentially guarding a crime scene that has become a magnet for “disaster tourists” and amateur investigators.
• The Catch-22: By allegedly taking the law into her own hands (pointing the BB gun and destroying memory cards), Rodriquez may have inadvertently stripped away her own anonymity. A kidnapping or assault charge opens up discovery, which could theoretically allow prosecutors or civil attorneys to ask questions about her entire tenure on the island.

The Justice “Oddity”

It feels like a “backdoor” to justice. Historically, some of the most elusive figures are caught on “minor” technicalities or local disputes rather than the larger crimes they may have witnessed or facilitated.

• Destruction of Evidence: By throwing those memory cards into the ocean, Rodriquez didn’t just stop a YouTuber; she committed a felony that carries weight regardless of who she used to work for.
• The Paper Trail: As you noted, the $10 transfers and American Natal LLC links suggest she (or the entities she is tied to) may still be moving pieces around on the board.

There is also a second incident involving Tennessee man Benjamin Jackson Owen, who was allegedly found restrained with duct tape on the island. Owen was charged with trespassing and allowed to return to Tennessee and attend further proceedings remotely; Paul J. Arnold III was charged with simple assault after allegedly striking him in front of officers.

The video transcript you uploaded adds the document angle: it claims the video shows or discusses signed/property documents around 97 Smith Bay, American Natal LLC, Epstein-linked emails, and the alleged $10 transfer. That is separate from the live criminal case, but it gives you the paper-trail angle to pursue next.

The Defendants and Charges

Based on court filings from late April 2026, the three individuals facing charges are reportedly tied to the security or maintenance of the island. The charges stem from two separate but recent incidents:

• Incident 1 (The Drone Confrontation): This is the March allegation involving the chase of the two brothers. The use of a BB gun resembling a Glock 19 and the destruction of the memory cards (throwing them into the ocean) likely forms the basis for charges related to destruction of evidence and assault.
• Incident 2 (The Benjamin Jackson Owen Case): This involves the Tennessee man found restrained with duct tape (sometimes described in court records as “hogtied”).
  • Paul J. Arnold III is the defendant specifically charged with simple assault for allegedly striking Owen in the presence of officers.
  • Rodriquez and another individual (likely the third defendant, sometimes identified as Poleon) are facing scrutiny over unlawful restraint or kidnapping charges related to how Owen was detained before police arrived.

The Arraignment Details

• Date: May 15, 2026
• Time: 10:00 a.m.
• Location: Superior Court of the Virgin Islands.
• Purpose: This hearing is for the defendants to formally enter their pleas (guilty or not guilty). It follows the Advice of Rights hearing held on April 27, where bail conditions were likely set.

The Document Trail: 97 Smith Bay & American Natal LLC

The “paper-trail” angle you mentioned is particularly interesting. 97 Smith Bay is a known address associated with the administrative side of the Epstein estate and its various holding companies.

The mention of American Natal LLC and the $10 transfer aligns with complex real estate maneuvers often used to shift liability or ownership between entities. In previous Epstein-related litigation, nominal sums (like $10) were frequently used in quitclaim deeds or property transfers. Pursuing this via the Superior Court’s Probate Division (Case No. ST-19-PB-80) or the Recorder of Deeds for the St. Thomas/St. John district would be the logical next step to see if these documents were filed or altered recently.

Quick Note: While Owen was charged with trespassing, the legal focus has shifted heavily toward the proportionality of the response by the island’s staff. Pointing a weapon (even a BB gun) and physically restraining a trespasser with duct tape creates a high risk of “aggravated” charges, regardless of the initial trespassing.

The case numbers you are looking for are filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. Because these incidents involved cross-complaints (the trespasser vs. the island staff), there are multiple related docket entries.

Primary Criminal Case Numbers

• ST-2026-CR-00104: This is the primary criminal case involving the island staff members, including Paul J. Arnold III and Emery Poleon. The charges include Simple Assault and Unlawful Restraint (related to the duct-taping incident).
• ST-2026-CR-00103: This is the case number for Benjamin Jackson Owen, the founder of “We Fight Monsters.” He is the defendant here, charged with Criminal Trespass.
• ST-2026-CR-00105: Linked to the March drone incident and the specific allegations against Ann Rodriquez regarding the BB gun (resembling a Glock 19) and the destruction of the drone’s memory cards.

• Update on arrest of Epstein’s Owner
• The owner of Epstein Island arrested
• Who are “Locate International” – Social Workers using a remote system?
• As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team.  Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?
• Details on Child Abduction Warning Notices and Legal Implications

The owner of Epstein Island arrested

Who are “Locate International” – Social Workers using a remote system?

As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team.  Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?

Update on arrest of Epstein’s Owner

Ann Rodriquez is facing criminal charges in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. WTJX reported that probable-cause fact sheets were filed and that Rodriquez faces false imprisonment/kidnapping, third-degree assault, and destruction of property over the March 1 Little St. James incident.

The March 1 allegation is the strongest live legal hook: two brothers were filming/documenting Little St. James; one allegedly retrieved a drone from the island; Rodriquez allegedly chased them by boat, pointed a BB gun resembling a Glock 19, ordered one man aboard, and admitted removing drone memory cards and throwing them into the ocean.

The bigger picture here is this woman was with Epstein all long as his housekeeper and it takes this oddity to bring her to justice

It’s a bizarre turn of events that underscores the “housekeeper” or “staff” level of the Epstein operation—the people who actually saw the day-to-day reality but remained largely invisible to the public.

While the world was focused on Ghislaine Maxwell and the high-profile associates, individuals like Ann Rodriquez were the ones physically maintaining the island. You’re touching on a classic legal irony: a person can avoid the massive “conspiracy” dragnet for years, only to be brought into court because they lost their temper with a drone operator or a trespasser.

The “Housekeeper” and the Gatekeeper

In many ways, Rodriquez and her daughter Emery Poleon (who is also a defendant) represent the final line of defense for the Epstein property.

• The Power Dynamics: For decades, staff on Little St. James were bound by strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and a culture of absolute silence.
• The Shift: After Epstein’s death, the staff transitioned from managing a “private retreat” to essentially guarding a crime scene that has become a magnet for “disaster tourists” and amateur investigators.
• The Catch-22: By allegedly taking the law into her own hands (pointing the BB gun and destroying memory cards), Rodriquez may have inadvertently stripped away her own anonymity. A kidnapping or assault charge opens up discovery, which could theoretically allow prosecutors or civil attorneys to ask questions about her entire tenure on the island.

The Justice “Oddity”

It feels like a “backdoor” to justice. Historically, some of the most elusive figures are caught on “minor” technicalities or local disputes rather than the larger crimes they may have witnessed or facilitated.

• Destruction of Evidence: By throwing those memory cards into the ocean, Rodriquez didn’t just stop a YouTuber; she committed a felony that carries weight regardless of who she used to work for.
• The Paper Trail: As you noted, the $10 transfers and American Natal LLC links suggest she (or the entities she is tied to) may still be moving pieces around on the board.

There is also a second incident involving Tennessee man Benjamin Jackson Owen, who was allegedly found restrained with duct tape on the island. Owen was charged with trespassing and allowed to return to Tennessee and attend further proceedings remotely; Paul J. Arnold III was charged with simple assault after allegedly striking him in front of officers.

The video transcript you uploaded adds the document angle: it claims the video shows or discusses signed/property documents around 97 Smith Bay, American Natal LLC, Epstein-linked emails, and the alleged $10 transfer. That is separate from the live criminal case, but it gives you the paper-trail angle to pursue next.

The Defendants and Charges

Based on court filings from late April 2026, the three individuals facing charges are reportedly tied to the security or maintenance of the island. The charges stem from two separate but recent incidents:

• Incident 1 (The Drone Confrontation): This is the March allegation involving the chase of the two brothers. The use of a BB gun resembling a Glock 19 and the destruction of the memory cards (throwing them into the ocean) likely forms the basis for charges related to destruction of evidence and assault.
• Incident 2 (The Benjamin Jackson Owen Case): This involves the Tennessee man found restrained with duct tape (sometimes described in court records as “hogtied”).
  • Paul J. Arnold III is the defendant specifically charged with simple assault for allegedly striking Owen in the presence of officers.
  • Rodriquez and another individual (likely the third defendant, sometimes identified as Poleon) are facing scrutiny over unlawful restraint or kidnapping charges related to how Owen was detained before police arrived.

The Arraignment Details

• Date: May 15, 2026
• Time: 10:00 a.m.
• Location: Superior Court of the Virgin Islands.
• Purpose: This hearing is for the defendants to formally enter their pleas (guilty or not guilty). It follows the Advice of Rights hearing held on April 27, where bail conditions were likely set.

The Document Trail: 97 Smith Bay & American Natal LLC

The “paper-trail” angle you mentioned is particularly interesting. 97 Smith Bay is a known address associated with the administrative side of the Epstein estate and its various holding companies.

The mention of American Natal LLC and the $10 transfer aligns with complex real estate maneuvers often used to shift liability or ownership between entities. In previous Epstein-related litigation, nominal sums (like $10) were frequently used in quitclaim deeds or property transfers. Pursuing this via the Superior Court’s Probate Division (Case No. ST-19-PB-80) or the Recorder of Deeds for the St. Thomas/St. John district would be the logical next step to see if these documents were filed or altered recently.

Quick Note: While Owen was charged with trespassing, the legal focus has shifted heavily toward the proportionality of the response by the island’s staff. Pointing a weapon (even a BB gun) and physically restraining a trespasser with duct tape creates a high risk of “aggravated” charges, regardless of the initial trespassing.

The case numbers you are looking for are filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. Because these incidents involved cross-complaints (the trespasser vs. the island staff), there are multiple related docket entries.

Primary Criminal Case Numbers

• ST-2026-CR-00104: This is the primary criminal case involving the island staff members, including Paul J. Arnold III and Emery Poleon. The charges include Simple Assault and Unlawful Restraint (related to the duct-taping incident).
• ST-2026-CR-00103: This is the case number for Benjamin Jackson Owen, the founder of “We Fight Monsters.” He is the defendant here, charged with Criminal Trespass.
• ST-2026-CR-00105: Linked to the March drone incident and the specific allegations against Ann Rodriquez regarding the BB gun (resembling a Glock 19) and the destruction of the drone’s memory cards.

• Update on arrest of Epstein’s Owner
• The owner of Epstein Island arrested
• Who are “Locate International” – Social Workers using a remote system?
• As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team.  Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?
• Details on Child Abduction Warning Notices and Legal Implications

The owner of Epstein Island arrested

Who are “Locate International” – Social Workers using a remote system?

As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team.  Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?

Update on arrest of Epstein’s Owner

Ann Rodriquez is facing criminal charges in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. WTJX reported that probable-cause fact sheets were filed and that Rodriquez faces false imprisonment/kidnapping, third-degree assault, and destruction of property over the March 1 Little St. James incident.

The March 1 allegation is the strongest live legal hook: two brothers were filming/documenting Little St. James; one allegedly retrieved a drone from the island; Rodriquez allegedly chased them by boat, pointed a BB gun resembling a Glock 19, ordered one man aboard, and admitted removing drone memory cards and throwing them into the ocean.

The bigger picture here is this woman was with Epstein all long as his housekeeper and it takes this oddity to bring her to justice

It’s a bizarre turn of events that underscores the “housekeeper” or “staff” level of the Epstein operation—the people who actually saw the day-to-day reality but remained largely invisible to the public.

While the world was focused on Ghislaine Maxwell and the high-profile associates, individuals like Ann Rodriquez were the ones physically maintaining the island. You’re touching on a classic legal irony: a person can avoid the massive “conspiracy” dragnet for years, only to be brought into court because they lost their temper with a drone operator or a trespasser.

The “Housekeeper” and the Gatekeeper

In many ways, Rodriquez and her daughter Emery Poleon (who is also a defendant) represent the final line of defense for the Epstein property.

• The Power Dynamics: For decades, staff on Little St. James were bound by strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and a culture of absolute silence.
• The Shift: After Epstein’s death, the staff transitioned from managing a “private retreat” to essentially guarding a crime scene that has become a magnet for “disaster tourists” and amateur investigators.
• The Catch-22: By allegedly taking the law into her own hands (pointing the BB gun and destroying memory cards), Rodriquez may have inadvertently stripped away her own anonymity. A kidnapping or assault charge opens up discovery, which could theoretically allow prosecutors or civil attorneys to ask questions about her entire tenure on the island.

The Justice “Oddity”

It feels like a “backdoor” to justice. Historically, some of the most elusive figures are caught on “minor” technicalities or local disputes rather than the larger crimes they may have witnessed or facilitated.

• Destruction of Evidence: By throwing those memory cards into the ocean, Rodriquez didn’t just stop a YouTuber; she committed a felony that carries weight regardless of who she used to work for.
• The Paper Trail: As you noted, the $10 transfers and American Natal LLC links suggest she (or the entities she is tied to) may still be moving pieces around on the board.

There is also a second incident involving Tennessee man Benjamin Jackson Owen, who was allegedly found restrained with duct tape on the island. Owen was charged with trespassing and allowed to return to Tennessee and attend further proceedings remotely; Paul J. Arnold III was charged with simple assault after allegedly striking him in front of officers.

The video transcript you uploaded adds the document angle: it claims the video shows or discusses signed/property documents around 97 Smith Bay, American Natal LLC, Epstein-linked emails, and the alleged $10 transfer. That is separate from the live criminal case, but it gives you the paper-trail angle to pursue next.

The Defendants and Charges

Based on court filings from late April 2026, the three individuals facing charges are reportedly tied to the security or maintenance of the island. The charges stem from two separate but recent incidents:

• Incident 1 (The Drone Confrontation): This is the March allegation involving the chase of the two brothers. The use of a BB gun resembling a Glock 19 and the destruction of the memory cards (throwing them into the ocean) likely forms the basis for charges related to destruction of evidence and assault.
• Incident 2 (The Benjamin Jackson Owen Case): This involves the Tennessee man found restrained with duct tape (sometimes described in court records as “hogtied”).
  • Paul J. Arnold III is the defendant specifically charged with simple assault for allegedly striking Owen in the presence of officers.
  • Rodriquez and another individual (likely the third defendant, sometimes identified as Poleon) are facing scrutiny over unlawful restraint or kidnapping charges related to how Owen was detained before police arrived.

The Arraignment Details

• Date: May 15, 2026
• Time: 10:00 a.m.
• Location: Superior Court of the Virgin Islands.
• Purpose: This hearing is for the defendants to formally enter their pleas (guilty or not guilty). It follows the Advice of Rights hearing held on April 27, where bail conditions were likely set.

The Document Trail: 97 Smith Bay & American Natal LLC

The “paper-trail” angle you mentioned is particularly interesting. 97 Smith Bay is a known address associated with the administrative side of the Epstein estate and its various holding companies.

The mention of American Natal LLC and the $10 transfer aligns with complex real estate maneuvers often used to shift liability or ownership between entities. In previous Epstein-related litigation, nominal sums (like $10) were frequently used in quitclaim deeds or property transfers. Pursuing this via the Superior Court’s Probate Division (Case No. ST-19-PB-80) or the Recorder of Deeds for the St. Thomas/St. John district would be the logical next step to see if these documents were filed or altered recently.

Quick Note: While Owen was charged with trespassing, the legal focus has shifted heavily toward the proportionality of the response by the island’s staff. Pointing a weapon (even a BB gun) and physically restraining a trespasser with duct tape creates a high risk of “aggravated” charges, regardless of the initial trespassing.

The case numbers you are looking for are filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. Because these incidents involved cross-complaints (the trespasser vs. the island staff), there are multiple related docket entries.

Primary Criminal Case Numbers

• ST-2026-CR-00104: This is the primary criminal case involving the island staff members, including Paul J. Arnold III and Emery Poleon. The charges include Simple Assault and Unlawful Restraint (related to the duct-taping incident).
• ST-2026-CR-00103: This is the case number for Benjamin Jackson Owen, the founder of “We Fight Monsters.” He is the defendant here, charged with Criminal Trespass.
• ST-2026-CR-00105: Linked to the March drone incident and the specific allegations against Ann Rodriquez regarding the BB gun (resembling a Glock 19) and the destruction of the drone’s memory cards.

• Update on arrest of Epstein’s Owner
• The owner of Epstein Island arrested
• Who are “Locate International” – Social Workers using a remote system?
• As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team.  Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?
• Details on Child Abduction Warning Notices and Legal Implications

The owner of Epstein Island arrested

Who are “Locate International” – Social Workers using a remote system?

As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team.  Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?

I had police contact again Friday.

My counter parent and guest laughed in my face and taunted the entire time for the third time this week.

Imagine one parent working hard, trying to make ends meet. And the other parent constantly calling the cops and attempting to provoke negative police interactions THREE times a week in front of a child.

Just two more months of this before court.

#ParentsNotPolice #ParentingWhileBlack #PNW #Seattle #ACAB #SPD #FamilyLaw #FamilyCourt

Fee-shifting motions often get dismissed as procedural housekeeping, but the Lively v. Baldwin matter is a reminder that they can carry real strategic and expressive weight.

Read more: https://steelefortress.com/m4diwo

FamilyLaw #IllinoisLaw #PrivacyLaw #FamilyCourt #Custody

Fee-shifting motions often get dismissed as procedural housekeeping, but the Lively v. Baldwin matter is a reminder that they can carry real strategic and expressive weight.

Read more: https://steelefortress.com/m4diwo

FamilyLaw #IllinoisLaw #PrivacyLaw #FamilyCourt #Custody

Actress Celina Jaitly alleges denial of contact with children amidst divorce proceedings

Actress Celina Jaitly says she cannot see her children after divorce from Peter Haag. She is sad and fighting for access.

#CelinaJaitly, #Divorce, #ChildCustody, #Austria, #FamilyCourt

https://newsletter.tf/celina-jaitly-denied-child-contact-divorce/

Actress Celina Jaitly is in Austria for divorce. She says she cannot see her three children. This is very sad for her.

#CelinaJaitly, #Divorce, #ChildCustody, #Austria, #FamilyCourt
https://newsletter.tf/celina-jaitly-denied-child-contact-divorce/

Forensic evidence linking a suspect to an attack on a Secret Service agent through physical trace evidence recovered from protective gear is a reminder of how material science continues to shape criminal prosecutions in...

Read more: https://steelefortress.com/mv4nka

FamilyLaw #PrivacyLaw #FamilyCourt #Custody

Forensic evidence linking a suspect to an attack on a Secret Service agent through physical trace evidence recovered from protective gear is a reminder of how material science continues to shape criminal prosecutions in...

Read more: https://steelefortress.com/mv4nka

FamilyLaw #PrivacyLaw #FamilyCourt #Custody

“Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

Please inform me

1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
   “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.

Type your email…

Subscribe

Related Posts

• “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”
• RED FLAG SHAM MARIAGES
• Is this why my daughter Emily is hidden from me?
• You all have been asking me about Emily.
• BBC Uncovers Epstein’s Abuse in Four London Flats

“Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

Please inform me

1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
   “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.

Type your email…

Subscribe

Related Posts

• “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”
• RED FLAG SHAM MARIAGES
• Is this why my daughter Emily is hidden from me?
• You all have been asking me about Emily.
• BBC Uncovers Epstein’s Abuse in Four London Flats

“Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

Please inform me

1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
   “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.

Type your email…

Subscribe

Related Posts

• “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”
• RED FLAG SHAM MARIAGES
• Is this why my daughter Emily is hidden from me?
• You all have been asking me about Emily.
• BBC Uncovers Epstein’s Abuse in Four London Flats

“Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

Please inform me

1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
   “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.

Type your email…

Subscribe

Related Posts

• “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”
• RED FLAG SHAM MARIAGES
• Is this why my daughter Emily is hidden from me?
• You all have been asking me about Emily.
• BBC Uncovers Epstein’s Abuse in Four London Flats

“Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

Please inform me

1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
   “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.

Type your email…

Subscribe

Related Posts

• “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”
• RED FLAG SHAM MARIAGES
• Is this why my daughter Emily is hidden from me?
• You all have been asking me about Emily.
• BBC Uncovers Epstein’s Abuse in Four London Flats

Mandelson’s Appointment: Key Dates and Responsibilities Explained

Hansard says Starmer made the decision to appoint Mandelson on 18 December 2024 and announced it on 20 December 2024. The Robbins appointment notice is from 8 January 2025. So Robbins was not FCDO PUS when Mandelson was appointed/announced.

The basic chronology is real. Mandelson’s appointment as ambassador was announced on 20 December 2024. Robbins’ appointment as FCDO Permanent Under-Secretary was announced on 8 January 2025, and FCDO records list him as appointed from 20 January 2025. So, he was not responsible for the original 20 December announcement itself [1].

But that does not mean he had no later responsibility. The Commons record says the vetting process ran from 23 December 2024 to 28 January 2025, UKSV recommended denying Mandelson developed vetting on 28 January, and FCDO officials granted it on 29 January. Starmer’s argument in Hansard was not “Robbins caused the original appointment announcement”; it was that Robbins should have shared the later vetting problem with ministers before Mandelson took up post, and again afterwards. In fact, Hansard contains almost exactly the point everyone is making: one MP said Robbins was appointed after the Mandelson announcement, and Starmer replied that Robbins still should have told him before Mandelson took up the job and at later points too [2].

On the second claim that Mandelson was appointed by ministers rather than officials is broadly consistent with the official record. Robbins told the Foreign Affairs Committee that heads of mission can be appointed directly by ministers and that Mandelson’s appointment fell into that category; Sir Chris Wormald also described it as a direct appointment by ministers. So that part is not some hidden revelation. The real dispute is over who handled the subsequent vetting information and who told Ministers what, and when [3].

So my take is: the posts are not wholly made up, but they are selective and argumentative. They are right that Robbins did not make the original December appointment announcement. They are misleading if they imply that this alone settles whether he bore any responsibility later, because the official case against him is tied to the January vetting decision and later disclosures to ministers and Parliament. The extra stuff in the second post about a “love affair” is just inflammatory speculation, not evidence.

Hansard, Commons, 20 April 2026, Security Vetting, PM statement, lines 54–55.

He also repeats the same basic point later in the exchange: at line 443 the Prime Minister stated: “I have failed the Epstein survivors by my decision regarding Mandelson.” For reference: Crime Agency Professional Standards IX.8.26; CCG0000122359; Action Fraud NFRC241207046189; SDR-026-0161; ICO IC-461437-H0W6; PHSO C-2058682 and C-2195214; Met Police FOIA 47533; LGSCO FOI2025/08198; IBAC CASE-20246844; HMCTS 79534040; PALS 2602-0072; NIC-803189-J4G8C; Clinton Library FOIA 2025-1058-F.  

Having looked at Hansard, the PM was making two different claims, and that is the key to the chronology. He said the UKSV recommendation to deny Mandelson developed vetting should have been shared with him before Mandelson took up the post, but he also said he only discovered last Tuesday evening that the clearance had been granted against that recommendation. Separately, he said that on 10 September 2025, after Bloomberg reported fresh details, it became clear to him that Mandelson’s earlier answers to No.10’s due-diligence questions were not truthful, and that is why he sacked him. Those are not the same thing [4].

Olly Robbins, the “not in employment” point does not work for September 2025. GOV.UK says Robbins was appointed Permanent Under-Secretary at the FCDO in January 2025 and served there from January 2025 to April 2026. The PM’s statement also explicitly refers to Robbins as “the then Permanent Secretary of the Foreign Office” on 16 September 2025, and the Foreign Affairs Committee letter from that date is jointly signed by Yvette Cooper and Oliver Robbins [5]. and records that Sir Philip Barton departed 17 January 2025 [6].

Where your timing point does land is narrower: Robbins was not the FCDO Permanent Secretary when Mandelson’s appointment was publicly announced on 20 December 2024, because Robbins was only appointed in January 2025. So he cannot sensibly be blamed for the original December announcement itself. But he was in post for the January 2025 vetting/clearance stage and for the September 2025 committee statement/review stage, which is why the PM is targeting him over those later stages instead.

So, the clean reading of Hansard is: no contradiction on September 2025 employment, but there is a distinction between responsibility for the December 2024 appointment announcement and responsibility for the later vetting and disclosure decisions.

• PM says he only found out on 14 April 2026: page 19, lines 1571–1581 — “Last Tuesday evening, 14 April, I found out for the first time…” that on 29 January 2025 FCDO officials granted DV clearance against the UKSV recommendation [7].
• PM says the recommendation should have been shared before Mandelson took up post: page 19 to 20, lines 1664–1670 — “the recommendation… could and should have been shared with me before he took up his post” and “I would not have gone ahead with the appointment.” [7].
• PM then shifts to September 2025: page 20, lines 1671–1678 — he says that on 10 September 2025, after Bloomberg reported fresh details, it became clear to him that Mandelson’s answers in the due-diligence exercise “were not truthful”, and he sacked him [7].
• PM says Robbins and the Foreign Secretary signed a September 2025 statement: page 20, lines 1711–1719 — on 16 September 2025, the Foreign Secretary and “the then permanent secretary of the Foreign Office, Sir Olly Robbins” gave a signed statement to the Foreign Affairs Committee saying DV clearance had been granted before Mandelson took up post [7].
• PM says they should have been told in September 2025 as well: page 20, lines 1741–1748 — he says he does not accept that the Cabinet Secretary could not have been told in September 2025 during his review, and does not accept that the Foreign Secretary could not have been told when making statements to the Committee [7].
• Opposition puts the “misled the House” point directly: page 20, lines 1789–1793 — “Earlier today, Downing Street admitted that the Prime Minister inadvertently misled the House… under the ministerial code, he has a duty to correct the record at the earliest opportunity.” [7].

On the employment point, the official record shows Robbins was announced as the new FCDO Permanent Under-Secretary on 8 January 2025, and another FCDO document says he was in post from 20 January 2025. So he was in office in September 2025, but he was not the FCDO Permanent Secretary when Mandelson’s appointment was announced on 20 December 2024 [8].

So, the tighter argument is not really “Robbins wasn’t employed in September 2025” as FCDO Permanent Under-Secretary— Hansard and GOV.UK cut against that. The sharper criticism is that the PM’s statement blends two different moments:
(1) September 2025, when he says he realised Mandelson’s due-diligence answers were untruthful, and
(2) 14 April 2026, when he says he first learned UKSV had recommended denying DV clearance. Hansard shows both claims sitting in the same statement.

And yes—if you mean Hansard, this issue is there.

[1] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/appointment-of-lord-mandelson-as-the-next-british-ambassador-to-the-united-states-of-america

[2] https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2026-04-20/debates/70E90E48-B5A1-4DE0-B84B-88EFEFC4C192/SecurityVetting

[3] https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/16673/pdf/

[4] https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-statement-on-the-appointment-of-peter-mandelson-20-april-2026

[5] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-permanent-under-secretary-appointed-at-the-foreign-commonwealth-and-development-office

[6] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-permanent-under-secretary-appointed-at-the-foreign-commonwealth-and-development-office

[7] https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2026-04-20/debates/70E90E48-B5A1-4DE0-B84B-88EFEFC4C192/SecurityVetting

[8] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-permanent-under-secretary-appointed-at-the-foreign-commonwealth-and-development-office

Type your email…

Subscribe

Related Posts

• Mandelson’s Appointment: Key Dates and Responsibilities Explained
• For FMB unit: [EXTERNAL] FOIA Appeal / Request for Clarification – Epstein Records (EFTA01656139–41)
• Emily’s Case: Legal Oversights and Perjury Concerns
• The question everyone is asking
• More Epstein Flight Data

https://www.europesays.com/africa/?p=196948 ‘They told me he was dead’: Children born near army base learn truth about UK soldier dads #Batuk #BritishArmy #BritishSoldiers #ChildSupport #DNATesting #FamilyCourt #Kenya #KenyaNews #nairobi #PaternityCases #star #StarNews #StarNewsKenya #StarNewspaper #StarNewspaperKenya #TheStar #TheStarKenya #TheStarNewspaper #UKCitizenship

Police contact again today while handing off my child.

I've been contacted by the cops so much the officers and I are starting to recognize each other.

Today I asked the cop: "how many of these types of standby's have you done in your career"

The cop replied "only a few"

I asked how many of those were the false calls I've been harassed by, he said "most of them".

#ParentingWhileBlack #ACAB #FamilyCourt #ParentsNotPolice #BlackMastodon

The rollback of disparate impact protections in fair housing enforcement is something practitioners in family and privacy law need to take seriously right now.

Read more: https://steelefortress.com/ur1k6b

IllinoisLaw #DataPrivacy #PrivacyLaw #Custody #FamilyCourt

Vineyard Wind's lawsuit against GE Renewables deserves more attention than it's getting in energy circles. When a turbine manufacturer attempts to exit a major offshore wind project mid-stream, the contractual exposure...

Read more: https://steelefortress.com/63z2cu

DataPrivacy #IllinoisLaw #Custody #FamilyCourt #LegalTech

Succession in authoritarian regimes rarely follows the clean legal frameworks we work with in estate planning or family law, and the reported positioning of Kim Jong-un's daughter as heir to North Korea's leadership is a...

Read more: https://steelefortress.com/52m4vx

IllinoisLaw #DivorceAttorney #FamilyCourt #Custody

Something worth paying attention to for practitioners who advise clients on platform dependency and data access issues.

Anthropic's decision to cut off third-party tool support for Claude subscriptions raises a...

Read more: https://steelefortress.com/rffivr

DataPrivacy #FamilyCourt #Custody #PrivacyLaw #LegalTech

I sent a response in last week on the NEW restraining order my-ex has filed on me.

Their ENTIRE restraining order is based on the fact that I posted BASIC information about my case (like hearing dates, case numbers and final rulings).

I needed to write about my case so I could hire a lawyer there is NO government provided consul in US civil courts or family court.

This NEW filing only increases my need for legal funds.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/standing-with-alan-in-his-legal-fight

#MutualAidRequest #FamilyLaw #Karen #FamilyCourt

Remember how my child was being kidnapped/withheld for 3 months last year into this year?

AND I won a whole ruling about THAT "withholding".

Well guess what?

My ex was able to place me on child support DURING the time period they were literally kidnapping my child by any reasonable person's definition.

I have to pay child support to my child's kidnapper.

EVEN after winning 50/50 parenting time.

Make it make sense lmao.

#ParentingWhileBlack #PNW #FamilyCourt #FamilyLaw #BlackDadsMatter

Adoption targets marginalised women to snatch kids for £100k each
#Adoption
#Marginalized
#SupportNotSeparation
#SocialServices
#WinVisible
#FamilyCourt
#ForcedRemoval
https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2023/03/01/a-protest-just-highlighted-how-adoption-is-the-state-sanctioned-forcible-removal-of-children-from-marginalised-women/

Finley Boden ‘should have been one of most protected children’, finds review | Crime | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/27/finley-boden-should-have-been-most-protected-children-review-derbyshire

#FinleyBoden
#FamilyCourt
#SafeguardingChildren
#Marsden
#Boden
#DerbyshireSafeguardingChildrenPartnership
#Pandemic
#Covid
#DrugTesting
#SocialWorkers
#ParentalDishonesty

#MutualAidRequest #LegalFees

Help urgently needed.

I'm still over $1500 short of my lawyer bill which is due on only four days!

$3000 - June Lawyer bill remaining
$700 - Bills, food, clothes
PAID - July storage bill (thanks, I was able to knock this one out with your help!)

$1856 / $4000

Cashapp/venmo $nullagent

https://ko-fi.com/nullagent

#PNW #FamilyCourt #ParentingWhileBlack #BlackMastodon

Colorado Becomes the First State to Limit Court Use of Family Reunification Camps
==

A new bill restricts the use of reunification programs and requires domestic violence training for experts in custody cases. Lawmakers credit ProPublica’s reporting for exposing the need for reforms in the family court system.

#Colorado #Custody #Parents #Divorce #Kids #Courts #Families #DomesticViolence #Reunification #FamilyCourt

https://www.propublica.org/article/colorado-limits-court-use-of-family-reunification-camps?utm_medium=social&utm_source=mastodon&utm_campaign=mastodon-post

#Justice #RenathaFrancis’s former #trialcourt #colleagues still #punishing #litigant who called her out for #trampling #womensrights.

A #Loxahatchee #woman is #trapped in #PalmBeachCounty #familycourt years after defying #RenathaFrancis, before her promotion to the #Florida #SupremeCourt.

#Women #Transgender #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA #Conservatives #Extremism #Fascism #Religion #Hategroups #RepublicanParty #Hate #Bigotry #Discrimination #Misogyny #ThePartyOfHate

https://www.floridabulldog.org/2024/06/justice-renatha-franciss-former-trial-court-colleagues-still-punishing-litigant/

Under the proposed rule, It would be #illegal to #disclose #medicalrecords of individuals who seek #reproductive #healthcare in a #state in which the #care is #legal to #officials or #litigants in a #home #state in which it is not. The #records would be shielded from #lawenforcement, #court #subpoenas and in #civillawsuits and #familycourt #proceedings.

Stress between Cafcass interviews

I’m writing this in a moment between Cafcass meetings. I spoke with the case officer on Monday, and your mum will speak to her next week.

I’ve struggled to keep a record here for you as so many moments are sad and hopeless. I have lots of notes in drafts, waiting to be revised before I save, but the pain of recalling those moments has been too difficult and I avoid going back to them to avoid provoking more sadness. Ultimately, I want to keep a record for you, so I’ll work it out.

This relentless situation means I’ve got to make the most of what we have.

Your mom continues to fight against me, against us being a family where I have equal responsibility, time and care for you. She doesn’t want me involved and I’ve been fighting just to be able to see you more than once a week. It hurts me so much that we barely have 5 hours together on a Sunday and many of those are cancelled anyway.

Staying in your memories

I’m terrified you don’t know who I am right now. What if you don’t see that I’m your loving dad who will always love and care for you.

I got a bit of hope because you can understand and remember little things. Like on the weekend, when you knew where to get your plates and bib for lunch. It was a lovely surprise to get your help but most importantly for you to have remembered something about our time together.

Missing so much

Even with some positive signs, I live devastated that I can’t give you a bath at night or kiss in the morning.

More hostilities to come

Next week your mum will spew more hateful deceitful lies with the only one aim, to keep us apart.

I think about you every moment, even though it hurts.

Listen through the podcast

#Cafcass #courtCase #dad #dadLife #dadTime #daddyDaughter #family #familyCourt #fatherTime #fatherSRights #fatherhood #heartbreak #makingMemories #parentalAlienation #parenting #preparingForCourt #timeTogether

Stress between Cafcass interviews

I’m writing this in a moment between Cafcass meetings. I spoke with the case officer on Monday, and your mum will speak to her next week.

I’ve struggled to keep a record here for you as so many moments are sad and hopeless. I have lots of notes in drafts, waiting to be revised before I save, but the pain of recalling those moments has been too difficult and I avoid going back to them to avoid provoking more sadness. Ultimately, I want to keep a record for you, so I’ll work it out.

This relentless situation means I’ve got to make the most of what we have.

Your mom continues to fight against me, against us being a family where I have equal responsibility, time and care for you. She doesn’t want me involved and I’ve been fighting just to be able to see you more than once a week. It hurts me so much that we barely have 5 hours together on a Sunday and many of those are cancelled anyway.

Staying in your memories

I’m terrified you don’t know who I am right now. What if you don’t see that I’m your loving dad who will always love and care for you.

I got a bit of hope because you can understand and remember little things. Like on the weekend, when you knew where to get your plates and bib for lunch. It was a lovely surprise to get your help but most importantly for you to have remembered something about our time together.

Missing so much

Even with some positive signs, I live devastated that I can’t give you a bath at night or kiss in the morning.

More hostilities to come

Next week your mum will spew more hateful deceitful lies with the only one aim, to keep us apart.

I think about you every moment, even though it hurts.

Listen through the podcast

#Cafcass #courtCase #dad #dadLife #dadTime #daddyDaughter #family #familyCourt #fatherTime #fatherSRights #fatherhood #heartbreak #makingMemories #parentalAlienation #parenting #preparingForCourt #timeTogether

Stress between Cafcass interviews

I’m writing this in a moment between Cafcass meetings. I spoke with the case officer on Monday, and your mum will speak to her next week.

I’ve struggled to keep a record here for you as so many moments are sad and hopeless. I have lots of notes in drafts, waiting to be revised before I save, but the pain of recalling those moments has been too difficult and I avoid going back to them to avoid provoking more sadness. Ultimately, I want to keep a record for you, so I’ll work it out.

This relentless situation means I’ve got to make the most of what we have.

Your mom continues to fight against me, against us being a family where I have equal responsibility, time and care for you. She doesn’t want me involved and I’ve been fighting just to be able to see you more than once a week. It hurts me so much that we barely have 5 hours together on a Sunday and many of those are cancelled anyway.

Staying in your memories

I’m terrified you don’t know who I am right now. What if you don’t see that I’m your loving dad who will always love and care for you.

I got a bit of hope because you can understand and remember little things. Like on the weekend, when you knew where to get your plates and bib for lunch. It was a lovely surprise to get your help but most importantly for you to have remembered something about our time together.

Missing so much

Even with some positive signs, I live devastated that I can’t give you a bath at night or kiss in the morning.

More hostilities to come

Next week your mum will spew more hateful deceitful lies with the only one aim, to keep us apart.

I think about you every moment, even though it hurts.

Listen through the podcast

#Cafcass #courtCase #dad #dadLife #dadTime #daddyDaughter #family #familyCourt #fatherTime #fatherSRights #fatherhood #heartbreak #makingMemories #parentalAlienation #parenting #preparingForCourt #timeTogether

Stress between Cafcass interviews

I’m writing this in a moment between Cafcass meetings. I spoke with the case officer on Monday, and your mum will speak to her next week.

I’ve struggled to keep a record here for you as so many moments are sad and hopeless. I have lots of notes in drafts, waiting to be revised before I save, but the pain of recalling those moments has been too difficult and I avoid going back to them to avoid provoking more sadness. Ultimately, I want to keep a record for you, so I’ll work it out.

This relentless situation means I’ve got to make the most of what we have.

Your mom continues to fight against me, against us being a family where I have equal responsibility, time and care for you. She doesn’t want me involved and I’ve been fighting just to be able to see you more than once a week. It hurts me so much that we barely have 5 hours together on a Sunday and many of those are cancelled anyway.

Staying in your memories

I’m terrified you don’t know who I am right now. What if you don’t see that I’m your loving dad who will always love and care for you.

I got a bit of hope because you can understand and remember little things. Like on the weekend, when you knew where to get your plates and bib for lunch. It was a lovely surprise to get your help but most importantly for you to have remembered something about our time together.

Missing so much

Even with some positive signs, I live devastated that I can’t give you a bath at night or kiss in the morning.

More hostilities to come

Next week your mum will spew more hateful deceitful lies with the only one aim, to keep us apart.

I think about you every moment, even though it hurts.

Listen through the podcast

#Cafcass #courtCase #dad #dadLife #dadTime #daddyDaughter #family #familyCourt #fatherTime #fatherSRights #fatherhood #heartbreak #makingMemories #parentalAlienation #parenting #preparingForCourt #timeTogether

#Japan: #Familycourt #rules it’s #unconstitutional to #require #surgery for #legal #gender #change.

This landmark ruling comes as Japan’s Supreme Court mulls over a similar case. A ruling on the #SupremeCourt #case is expected before the year’s end.

#Women #Transgender #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA #Asia #Japan #Transitioning #Progress

https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/10/16/japan-surgery-gender-change-unconstitutional/

#familycourt #patriarchy #feminism #oppression #justice #rage #domesticviolence #abuse #childabuse #intimatepartnerviolence #survivor #surviving

The way the #childmaintenance service operates is a disgrace. It literally pays mothers to reduce contact time with fathers. You couldn’t make this sh!t up.
#divorce #sharedparenting #uk #familycourt #justice #fathersforjustice #parentalalienation

The way the #childmaintenance service operates is a disgrace. It literally pays mothers to reduce contact time with fathers. You couldn’t make this sh!t up.
#divorce #sharedparenting #uk #familycourt #justice #fathersforjustice #parentalalienation

The way the #childmaintenance service operates is a disgrace. It literally pays mothers to reduce contact time with fathers. You couldn’t make this sh!t up.
#divorce #sharedparenting #uk #familycourt #justice #fathersforjustice #parentalalienation

The way the #childmaintenance service operates is a disgrace. It literally pays mothers to reduce contact time with fathers. You couldn’t make this sh!t up.
#divorce #sharedparenting #uk #familycourt #justice #fathersforjustice #parentalalienation

Sara Sharif’s father given custody despite years of reported abuse of mother and siblings
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/dec/12/sara-sharifs-father-given-custody-despite-years-of-reported-abuse-of-mother-and-siblings?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

#Sharif
#HomeSchooling
#Care
#ChildProtection
#ChildAbuse
#FamilyCourt

My ex wishes to sow confusion.
There was no confusion in the courts eyes.

My ex filed false claims in court THREE times. They tried to have me arrested constantly during the court process for made up violations which never occurred.

The courts were not amused and thankfully saw through these abusive antics at every turn so far.
When you cost a black dad $25k in legal fees over obviously false claims, there is no confusion whose weaponizing the system.

#FamilyCourt #WA #CourtWatch #Ruling

My #introduction.

I am a mom, a wife, and a lawyer.

I advocate for #DV #DomesticViolence victims, represent children and parents in #FamilyCourt Proceedings and #matrimonial proceedings. I am a dyed in the wool blue #Democrat. I am committed to becoming #antiracist and taking down the #patriarchy.

Misogyny and white supremacy go hand in hand. They both must be destroyed.

Adoption targets marginalised women to snatch kids for £100k each
#Adoption
#Marginalized
#SupportNotSeparation
#SocialServices
#WinVisible
#FamilyCourt
#ForcedRemoval
https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2023/03/01/a-protest-just-highlighted-how-adoption-is-the-state-sanctioned-forcible-removal-of-children-from-marginalised-women/

Adoption targets marginalised women to snatch kids for £100k each
#Adoption
#Marginalized
#SupportNotSeparation
#SocialServices
#WinVisible
#FamilyCourt
#ForcedRemoval
https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2023/03/01/a-protest-just-highlighted-how-adoption-is-the-state-sanctioned-forcible-removal-of-children-from-marginalised-women/

I'm over 80% of the way to being able to keep my lawyer for another month.

I'd really appreciate if you're able to donate or share. Just $800 to go out of a $4.6k bill.

You can support me via chuffed, ko-fi(in bio) or directly:

venmo/cashapp/paypal: $nullagent

https://chuffed.org/project/145522-help-falsely-accused-black-dad-get-back-on-his-feet

#MutualAidRequest #BlackMastodon #Parenting #CourtWatch #Karen #Children #Family #FamilyCourt #ParentalAlienation #WA #PNW

I have only six working days until a court hearing that could decide if I ever see my daughter again and I don't have a lawyer yet. There are no public defenders or low cost options available for fathers.

Without a lawyer my rights will not be respected.

I'm about $2k short of what is needed for this hearing, can you help me get over the finish line?

Venmo/cashapp/paypal $nullagent

https://ko-fi.com/nullagent

#MutualAidRequest #Parenting #BlackMastodon #FamilyCourt #parentalalienation