home.social

#judicialreview — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #judicialreview, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Turkish man who shot two people gets another chance to stay in Canada 10 years after refugee claim first denied

    A Turkish man denied refugee status in Canada a decade back because he shot two bystanders at a…
    #EuropeSays #Turkiye #Türkiye #canada #federalcourt #FederalCourtofCanada #judicialreview #NevzatEtik #RefugeeProtectionDivision #RPD #seriouscrime #Turkish
    europesays.com/turkiye/24006/

  2. Paul Krugman questions: Did the Roberts Court just grant a president dictatorial control? The recent decision, overturning 90 years of precedent, allows firing civil servants at will, which Krugman argues enables corruption and rewards those who enrich the president. Learn more about this crucial ruling here: paulkrugman.substack.com/p/a-v #CivilService #JudicialReview #Accountability #Democracy

  3. Dan Mangan reports, a federal judge just blocked President Trump's executive order on mail-in voting! Judge Indira Talwani ruled President Trump overstepped his authority, violating the Constitution and protecting state election control. This counters false voter fraud claims and safeguards November's elections from federal overreach. Read more about this crucial decision by Dan Mangan. cnbc.com/2026/06/25/us-judge-b #MailInVoting #VoterRights #JudicialReview #ElectionSecurity

  4. Federal Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order in Major Election Authority Ruling

    Federal Judge Bars Trump From Implementing Proof of Citizenship Requirement to Vote as a court rules election authority rests with states and Congress.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  5. Federal Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order in Major Election Authority Ruling

    Federal Judge Bars Trump From Implementing Proof of Citizenship Requirement to Vote as a court rules election authority rests with states and Congress.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  6. Federal Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order in Major Election Authority Ruling

    Federal Judge Bars Trump From Implementing Proof of Citizenship Requirement to Vote as a court rules election authority rests with states and Congress.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  7. Federal Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order in Major Election Authority Ruling

    Federal Judge Bars Trump From Implementing Proof of Citizenship Requirement to Vote as a court rules election authority rests with states and Congress.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  8. Rewriting history with a 'white-out pen'? A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to restore altered National Park exhibits, halting changes under an executive order. Judge Angel Kelley struck down removals of slavery exhibits and paused censorship of LGBTQ+ and labor history, protecting our shared past. Dive deeper into this significant ruling.
    cnbc.com/2026/06/13/judge-orde #PreserveHistory #NationalParks #JudicialReview

  9. Can a judge truly force history's restoration? Yes, a US District Judge just did! Angel Kelley ordered the Trump administration to reinstate exhibits on slavery and LGBTQ+ history removed from national parks, calling the prior effort an attempt to 'rewrite the Nation's history with a white-out pen.' This ruling pauses further removals and mandates weekly progress reports. See how this impacts our national parks' educational mission. cnbc.com/2026/06/13/judge-orde #NationalParks #History #JudicialReview #Preservation

  10. Dan Mangan reports, a federal judge ruled Trump's name must be removed from the Kennedy Center! Judge Christopher Cooper rejected the bid, stating keeping an unlawful action is not in the public interest. This decision supports Rep. Joyce Beatty's lawsuit, which argued only Congress can rename the center. Learn more about this significant legal outcome.
    cnbc.com/2026/06/12/trump-lose #JudicialReview #RuleOfLaw #KennedyCenter

  11. White House Pushes Sweeping Deportation Plans Amid Judicial Roadblocks

    Judges are stopping new US plans to deport many immigrants. This affects immigrants and their families. Find out why.

    #DeportationBlock, #USImmigration, #CourtRuling, #ImmigrantRights, #JudicialReview

    newsletter.tf/us-judges-block-

  12. SINGRAULI'S FOREST FRONTIER: COAL MINING IN QUESTION AS POLITICIAN URGES JUDICIAL CARE

    Politician Jairam Ramesh asks courts to carefully consider coal mining in Singrauli's 'no-go' forest areas. Affects environment and communities.

    #SingrauliMining, #ForestProtection, #JudicialReview, #EnvironmentIndia, #JairamRamesh

    newsletter.tf/singrauli-no-go-

  13. Supreme Court Bench Split on UAPA Bail Triggers Larger Bench Consideration

    Delhi Police asks Supreme Court to review UAPA bail rules due to different court rulings. Affects people accused under UAPA.

    #UAPABail, #SupremeCourtIndia, #DelhiRiots, #JudicialReview, #LegalNews

    newsletter.tf/supreme-court-ua

  14. Global Fragility: Political Gridlock and Judicial Tension

    France's govt faces crisis after Assembly vote. US sees 'MAGA judge' row. Who is affected? Voters and citizens in both countries.

    #FrancePolitics, #USPolitics, #GovernmentCrisis, #JudicialReview, #PoliticalNews

    newsletter.tf/france-govt-cris

  15. Global Fragility: Political Gridlock and Judicial Tension

    France's govt faces crisis after Assembly vote. US sees 'MAGA judge' row. Who is affected? Voters and citizens in both countries.

    #FrancePolitics, #USPolitics, #GovernmentCrisis, #JudicialReview, #PoliticalNews

    newsletter.tf/france-govt-cris

  16. @petealexharris @simon_brooke Any such decision by the NI Secretary could be challenged only by #JudicialReview. The test applied would be #WednesburyUnreasonablenes (lawprof.co/definition/irration), which sets a high bar for overturning a decision.

    But the bar is often topped. Judicial Review is often granted. Only in a minority of cases, but it's a non-trivial minority.

    In simple terms, the SoS can push his luck, but not take the piss.

  17. @petealexharris @simon_brooke Any such decision by the NI Secretary could be challenged only by #JudicialReview. The test applied would be #WednesburyUnreasonablenes (lawprof.co/definition/irration), which sets a high bar for overturning a decision.

    But the bar is often topped. Judicial Review is often granted. Only in a minority of cases, but it's a non-trivial minority.

    In simple terms, the SoS can push his luck, but not take the piss.

  18. @petealexharris @simon_brooke Any such decision by the NI Secretary could be challenged only by #JudicialReview. The test applied would be #WednesburyUnreasonablenes (lawprof.co/definition/irration), which sets a high bar for overturning a decision.

    But the bar is often topped. Judicial Review is often granted. Only in a minority of cases, but it's a non-trivial minority.

    In simple terms, the SoS can push his luck, but not take the piss.

  19. “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

    A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

    Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

    I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

    HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

    I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

    Please inform me

    1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
    2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
      “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
    3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

    I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

    I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.

    I telephoned Nationwide a complaint of this discussion under today’s date under reference COM00036660.

    CMC M118 says the Defendant had not responded by 27 May 2025. That is the court’s own record. Unless that record is formally corrected, the Defendant’s later strike-out / summary judgment application is procedurally defective and should itself be struck out.

    May 1, 2026

    Related Posts






    #children #courtCrisis #family #familyCourt #familyLaw #fosterCare #judicialReview #law #News #philosophy #politics
  20. “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

    A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

    Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

    I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

    HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

    I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

    Please inform me

    1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
    2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
      “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
    3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

    I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

    I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.


    May 1, 2026

    Type your email…

    Subscribe

    Related Posts






    #children #courtCrisis #family #familyCourt #familyLaw #fosterCare #judicialReview #law #News #philosophy #politics
  21. “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

    A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

    Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

    I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

    HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

    I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

    Please inform me

    1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
    2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
      “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
    3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

    I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

    I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.


    May 1, 2026

    Type your email…

    Subscribe

    Related Posts






    #children #courtCrisis #family #familyCourt #familyLaw #fosterCare #judicialReview #law #News #philosophy #politics
  22. R to @EUCourtPress: A landmark case confirming that the #EU is a “community based on the rule of law” ⚖️

    Click here to learn more 👉
    infocuria.curia.europa.eu/tabs

    #EULaw #RuleOfLaw #JudicialReview

    A landmark case confirming that the #EU is a “community based on the rule of law” ⚖️

    Click here to learn more 👉
    infocuria.curia.europa.eu/ta…

    #EULaw #RuleOfLaw #JudicialReview
    ---
    nitter.net/EUCourtPress/status

  23. Election Interference in 2026 U.S. Midterms A Constitutional Stress Test

    Election Interference in 2026 U.S. Midterms examines real risks, legal limits, and how Americans can protect democratic elections from political pressure.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  24. Election Interference in 2026 U.S. Midterms A Constitutional Stress Test

    Election Interference in 2026 U.S. Midterms examines real risks, legal limits, and how Americans can protect democratic elections from political pressure.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  25. Trump Criticizes Supreme Court Justices Following Tariff Ruling

    Donald Trump criticizes Supreme Court justices as 'embarrassment' and 'disgrace' after they blocked his tariffs in a 6-3 vote. Find out why.

    #TrumpTariffs, #SupremeCourt, #JudicialReview, #ExecutivePower, #USPolitics

    newsletter.tf/trump-criticizes

  26. Trump Criticizes Supreme Court Justices Following Tariff Ruling

    Donald Trump criticizes Supreme Court justices as 'embarrassment' and 'disgrace' after they blocked his tariffs in a 6-3 vote. Find out why.

    #TrumpTariffs, #SupremeCourt, #JudicialReview, #ExecutivePower, #USPolitics

    newsletter.tf/trump-criticizes

  27. Trump Criticizes Supreme Court Justices Following Tariff Ruling

    Donald Trump criticizes Supreme Court justices as 'embarrassment' and 'disgrace' after they blocked his tariffs in a 6-3 vote. Find out why.

    #TrumpTariffs, #SupremeCourt, #JudicialReview, #ExecutivePower, #USPolitics

    newsletter.tf/trump-criticizes

  28. President Expresses Strong Displeasure with Court Rulings

    President Trump is angry about court rulings that blocked his policies, including tariffs and deportations. See how this affects his administration.

    #TrumpCourtClash, #JudicialReview, #PolicyChallenges, #ExecutiveVsJudiciary, #LegalBattles

    newsletter.tf/president-trump-

  29. President Expresses Strong Displeasure with Court Rulings

    President Trump is angry about court rulings that blocked his policies, including tariffs and deportations. See how this affects his administration.

    #TrumpCourtClash, #JudicialReview, #PolicyChallenges, #ExecutiveVsJudiciary, #LegalBattles

    newsletter.tf/president-trump-

  30. "Hundreds of judges across the nation have ruled over 4,400 times that President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement arm is detaining people unlawfully, according to a new Reuters review of court documents. And that’s just since October. "

    #MassDetention #JudicialReview #DueProcess #ImmigrantRights #ICE
    motherjones.com/politics/2026/

  31. "Hundreds of judges across the nation have ruled over 4,400 times that President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement arm is detaining people unlawfully, according to a new Reuters review of court documents. And that’s just since October. "

    #MassDetention #JudicialReview #DueProcess #ImmigrantRights #ICE
    motherjones.com/politics/2026/

  32. "Hundreds of judges across the nation have ruled over 4,400 times that President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement arm is detaining people unlawfully, according to a new Reuters review of court documents. And that’s just since October. "

    #MassDetention #JudicialReview #DueProcess #ImmigrantRights #ICE
    motherjones.com/politics/2026/

  33. @Sarahw "Innocent until proven guilty" is the principle in criminal cases. This is not a criminal case; it is a civil action, specifically a #judicialReview (JR).

    In a judicial review, the principle is that government actions are presumed to be legal, unless a court finds otherwise.

    Appeals are a good idea. A second set of eyes to independently assess whether the law has been applied correctly. But only a small proportion of cases get an appeal hearing.

    @sean