#judicialreview — Public Fediverse posts

The National Security Scam – Legal Planet

The National Security Scam Just about everything gets labeled an emergency or national security threat these days. The…
#UnitedStates #US #USA #administrativelaw #Død #emergencydeclaration #fossilfuels #judicialreview #Nationalsecurity #oilandgas #pentagon #petehegseth #Pipelines #SecretaryofDefense
https://www.europesays.com/3239047/

https://www.europesays.com/people/219022/ The National Security Scam – Legal Planet #AdministrativeLaw #EmergencyDeclaration #FossilFuels #JudicialReview #NationalSecurity #OilAndGas #PeteHegseth #Pipelines

Tottenham Hotspur submit appeal request over Whitewebbs court judgement

It comes a month after a judge ruled that the planning permission issued to Spurs for a new…
#London #Britain #UnitedKingdom #UK #GB #England #Headlines #News #Europe #EU #Enfield #CourtofAppeal #EnfieldCouncil #GuardiansofWhitewebbs #judicialreview #TottenhamHotspur #Whitewebbs #WhitewebbsPark
https://www.europesays.com/gbr/london/20332/

Spurs plans for Whitewebbs Park in tatters after judge quashes planning permission

The judicial review verdict comes after a change of leadership at Enfield Council, which now opposes the Spurs…
#London #Britain #UnitedKingdom #UK #GB #England #Headlines #News #Europe #EU #Enfield #AlessandroGeorgiou #ConservativeParty #court #EnfieldCouncil #Football #judicialreview #parks #TottenhamHotspur #WhitewebbsPark
https://www.europesays.com/gbr/london/5468/

As Supreme Court decisions grow sharper, study examines justices’ concessions

https://www.umass.edu/news/article/supreme-court-decisions-grow-sharper-study-examines-justices-calculated-concessions

Comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49052625

#HackerNews #SupremeCourt #Justices #Concessions #LegalAnalysis #CourtDecisions #JudicialReview

As Supreme Court decisions grow sharper, study examines justices’ concessions

https://www.umass.edu/news/article/supreme-court-decisions-grow-sharper-study-examines-justices-calculated-concessions

Comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49052625

#HackerNews #SupremeCourt #Justices #Concessions #LegalAnalysis #CourtDecisions #JudicialReview

As Supreme Court decisions grow sharper, study examines justices’ concessions

https://www.umass.edu/news/article/supreme-court-decisions-grow-sharper-study-examines-justices-calculated-concessions

Comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49052625

#HackerNews #SupremeCourt #Justices #Concessions #LegalAnalysis #CourtDecisions #JudicialReview

As Supreme Court decisions grow sharper, study examines justices’ concessions

https://www.umass.edu/news/article/supreme-court-decisions-grow-sharper-study-examines-justices-calculated-concessions

Comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49052625

#HackerNews #SupremeCourt #Justices #Concessions #LegalAnalysis #CourtDecisions #JudicialReview

As Supreme Court decisions grow sharper, study examines justices’ concessions

https://www.umass.edu/news/article/supreme-court-decisions-grow-sharper-study-examines-justices-calculated-concessions

Comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49052625

#HackerNews #SupremeCourt #Justices #Concessions #LegalAnalysis #CourtDecisions #JudicialReview

#ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency #Environment #Biodiversity #AnTaisce #FriendsOfTheEarth #Ireland #Spéirghorm #Law #Legal #JudicialReview #LegalReform

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:qjaqauwzfmqz3uzauuufhrc4/post/3mq32s4erco2e

Three of ‘Croatian Six’ convicted over alleged terror plot may be innocent, inquiry finds

A judicial inquiry into the convictions of the so called “Croatian Six” over an alleged terrorist plot in…
#Australia #AntonZvirotic #AU #Austrlia #courtofcriminalappeal #Croatiansix #IlijaKokotovic #judicialreview #MaksimilianBebic #MileNekic #VicoVirkez #VjekoslavBrajkovic #Yugoslavia
https://www.europesays.com/australia/45410/

Turkish man who shot two people gets another chance to stay in Canada 10 years after refugee claim first denied

A Turkish man denied refugee status in Canada a decade back because he shot two bystanders at a…
#EuropeSays #Turkiye #Türkiye #canada #federalcourt #FederalCourtofCanada #judicialreview #NevzatEtik #RefugeeProtectionDivision #RPD #seriouscrime #Turkish
https://www.europesays.com/turkiye/24006/

Paul Krugman questions: Did the Roberts Court just grant a president dictatorial control? The recent decision, overturning 90 years of precedent, allows firing civil servants at will, which Krugman argues enables corruption and rewards those who enrich the president. Learn more about this crucial ruling here: https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/a-verdict-on-the-slaughter #CivilService #JudicialReview #Accountability #Democracy

Paul Krugman questions: Did the Roberts Court just grant a president dictatorial control? The recent decision, overturning 90 years of precedent, allows firing civil servants at will, which Krugman argues enables corruption and rewards those who enrich the president. Learn more about this crucial ruling here: https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/a-verdict-on-the-slaughter #CivilService #JudicialReview #Accountability #Democracy

https://www.europesays.com/ie/554590/ Councillors consider High Court action over executive's plans to increase rents – The Journal #BreakingNews #BreakingNews #Éire #FeaturedNews #FeaturedNews #Headlines #HighCourt #IE #Ireland #JudicialReview #LatestNews #LatestNews #LocalGovernment #MainNews #MainNews #News #RentHikes #SocialHousing #SouthDublinCountyCouncil #TopStories #TopStories

Dan Mangan reports, a federal judge just blocked President Trump's executive order on mail-in voting! Judge Indira Talwani ruled President Trump overstepped his authority, violating the Constitution and protecting state election control. This counters false voter fraud claims and safeguards November's elections from federal overreach. Read more about this crucial decision by Dan Mangan. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/25/us-judge-blocks-trumps-mail-in-voting-executive-order.html #MailInVoting #VoterRights #JudicialReview #ElectionSecurity

Dan Mangan reports, a federal judge just blocked President Trump's executive order on mail-in voting! Judge Indira Talwani ruled President Trump overstepped his authority, violating the Constitution and protecting state election control. This counters false voter fraud claims and safeguards November's elections from federal overreach. Read more about this crucial decision by Dan Mangan. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/25/us-judge-blocks-trumps-mail-in-voting-executive-order.html #MailInVoting #VoterRights #JudicialReview #ElectionSecurity

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order in Major Election Authority Ruling

https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/elections/federal-judge-blocks-trump-voting-order/

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order in Major Election Authority Ruling

https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/elections/federal-judge-blocks-trump-voting-order/

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order in Major Election Authority Ruling

https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/elections/federal-judge-blocks-trump-voting-order/

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order in Major Election Authority Ruling

https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/elections/federal-judge-blocks-trump-voting-order/

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order in Major Election Authority Ruling

https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/elections/federal-judge-blocks-trump-voting-order/

Rewriting history with a 'white-out pen'? A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to restore altered National Park exhibits, halting changes under an executive order. Judge Angel Kelley struck down removals of slavery exhibits and paused censorship of LGBTQ+ and labor history, protecting our shared past. Dive deeper into this significant ruling.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/13/judge-orders-restoration-of-national-park-changes-at-sites-that-disparaged-us.html #PreserveHistory #NationalParks #JudicialReview

Can a judge truly force history's restoration? Yes, a US District Judge just did! Angel Kelley ordered the Trump administration to reinstate exhibits on slavery and LGBTQ+ history removed from national parks, calling the prior effort an attempt to 'rewrite the Nation's history with a white-out pen.' This ruling pauses further removals and mandates weekly progress reports. See how this impacts our national parks' educational mission. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/13/judge-orders-restoration-of-national-park-changes-at-sites-that-disparaged-us.html #NationalParks #History #JudicialReview #Preservation

Rewriting history with a 'white-out pen'? A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to restore altered National Park exhibits, halting changes under an executive order. Judge Angel Kelley struck down removals of slavery exhibits and paused censorship of LGBTQ+ and labor history, protecting our shared past. Dive deeper into this significant ruling.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/13/judge-orders-restoration-of-national-park-changes-at-sites-that-disparaged-us.html #PreserveHistory #NationalParks #JudicialReview

Can a judge truly force history's restoration? Yes, a US District Judge just did! Angel Kelley ordered the Trump administration to reinstate exhibits on slavery and LGBTQ+ history removed from national parks, calling the prior effort an attempt to 'rewrite the Nation's history with a white-out pen.' This ruling pauses further removals and mandates weekly progress reports. See how this impacts our national parks' educational mission. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/13/judge-orders-restoration-of-national-park-changes-at-sites-that-disparaged-us.html #NationalParks #History #JudicialReview #Preservation

Dan Mangan reports, a federal judge ruled Trump's name must be removed from the Kennedy Center! Judge Christopher Cooper rejected the bid, stating keeping an unlawful action is not in the public interest. This decision supports Rep. Joyce Beatty's lawsuit, which argued only Congress can rename the center. Learn more about this significant legal outcome.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/12/trump-loses-kennedy-center-name.html #JudicialReview #RuleOfLaw #KennedyCenter

Dan Mangan reports, a federal judge ruled Trump's name must be removed from the Kennedy Center! Judge Christopher Cooper rejected the bid, stating keeping an unlawful action is not in the public interest. This decision supports Rep. Joyce Beatty's lawsuit, which argued only Congress can rename the center. Learn more about this significant legal outcome.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/12/trump-loses-kennedy-center-name.html #JudicialReview #RuleOfLaw #KennedyCenter

White House Pushes Sweeping Deportation Plans Amid Judicial Roadblocks

Judges are stopping new US plans to deport many immigrants. This affects immigrants and their families. Find out why.

#DeportationBlock, #USImmigration, #CourtRuling, #ImmigrantRights, #JudicialReview

https://newsletter.tf/us-judges-block-new-deportation-plans/

New plans to deport more immigrants have been stopped by US judges. This is different from previous years where some plans were allowed.

#DeportationBlock, #USImmigration, #CourtRuling, #ImmigrantRights, #JudicialReview
https://newsletter.tf/us-judges-block-new-deportation-plans/

SINGRAULI'S FOREST FRONTIER: COAL MINING IN QUESTION AS POLITICIAN URGES JUDICIAL CARE

Politician Jairam Ramesh asks courts to carefully consider coal mining in Singrauli's 'no-go' forest areas. Affects environment and communities.

#SingrauliMining, #ForestProtection, #JudicialReview, #EnvironmentIndia, #JairamRamesh

https://newsletter.tf/singrauli-no-go-forests-court-decision-impact/

A politician is asking courts to be very careful about allowing coal mining in protected forests in Singrauli. This decision could impact the environment.

#SingrauliMining, #ForestProtection, #JudicialReview, #EnvironmentIndia, #JairamRamesh
https://newsletter.tf/singrauli-no-go-forests-court-decision-impact/

Dan Mangan reports a federal judge halted President Trump’s DOJ controversial $1.8 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund," widely criticized as a "slush fund" for allies. The judge's order maintains the status quo, blocking any spending on the fund intended to compensate those alleging prosecutorial overreach. Curious about the implications? Read more:
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/29/trump-doj-fund-lawfare-blocked-judge.html #JudicialReview #Accountability

Dan Mangan reports a federal judge halted President Trump’s DOJ controversial $1.8 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund," widely criticized as a "slush fund" for allies. The judge's order maintains the status quo, blocking any spending on the fund intended to compensate those alleging prosecutorial overreach. Curious about the implications? Read more:
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/29/trump-doj-fund-lawfare-blocked-judge.html #JudicialReview #Accountability

New Post: What is the difference between Administrative Review and Judicial Review? https://immigrationbarrister.co.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-administrative-review-and-judicial-review/ #AdministrativeReview #ImmigrationsAppeal #JudicialReview

New Post: What is the difference between Administrative Review and Judicial Review? https://immigrationbarrister.co.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-administrative-review-and-judicial-review/ #AdministrativeReview #ImmigrationsAppeal #JudicialReview

New Post: What is the difference between Administrative Review and Judicial Review? https://immigrationbarrister.co.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-administrative-review-and-judicial-review/ #AdministrativeReview #ImmigrationsAppeal #JudicialReview

New Post: What is the difference between Administrative Review and Judicial Review? https://immigrationbarrister.co.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-administrative-review-and-judicial-review/ #AdministrativeReview #ImmigrationsAppeal #JudicialReview

New Post: What is the difference between Administrative Review and Judicial Review? https://immigrationbarrister.co.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-administrative-review-and-judicial-review/ #AdministrativeReview #ImmigrationsAppeal #JudicialReview

Airbus and Air France Convicted Over AF447 Crash

A Paris appeals court on…
#France #FR #Europe #EU #AirFrance #AerospaceEngineering #Airbus #AircraftSensors #AirlineSafety #aviationindustry #AviationLitigation #AviationRegulations #B2BAviationNews #Brazil #CorporateManslaughter #CourtofCassation #DanieleLamy #FlightAF447 #Germany #JudicialReview #legalliability #NelsonMarinhoFilho #ParisAppealsCourt #PedroLuizDeOrleansEBraganca #pilottraining #pitottubes
https://www.europesays.com/france/20590/

Supreme Court Bench Split on UAPA Bail Triggers Larger Bench Consideration

Delhi Police asks Supreme Court to review UAPA bail rules due to different court rulings. Affects people accused under UAPA.

#UAPABail, #SupremeCourtIndia, #DelhiRiots, #JudicialReview, #LegalNews

https://newsletter.tf/supreme-court-uapa-bail-rules-review-may-2026/

Two Supreme Court benches have given different opinions on bail under UAPA. This could lead to a bigger court review.

#UAPABail, #SupremeCourtIndia, #DelhiRiots, #JudicialReview, #LegalNews
https://newsletter.tf/supreme-court-uapa-bail-rules-review-may-2026/

Global Fragility: Political Gridlock and Judicial Tension

France's govt faces crisis after Assembly vote. US sees 'MAGA judge' row. Who is affected? Voters and citizens in both countries.

#FrancePolitics, #USPolitics, #GovernmentCrisis, #JudicialReview, #PoliticalNews

https://newsletter.tf/france-govt-crisis-us-judge-row-political-turmoil/

Global Fragility: Political Gridlock and Judicial Tension

France's govt faces crisis after Assembly vote. US sees 'MAGA judge' row. Who is affected? Voters and citizens in both countries.

#FrancePolitics, #USPolitics, #GovernmentCrisis, #JudicialReview, #PoliticalNews

https://newsletter.tf/france-govt-crisis-us-judge-row-political-turmoil/

France's government is in crisis after a vote in the National Assembly. This is a major political event for the country.

#FrancePolitics, #USPolitics, #GovernmentCrisis, #JudicialReview, #PoliticalNews
https://newsletter.tf/france-govt-crisis-us-judge-row-political-turmoil/

France's government is in crisis after a vote in the National Assembly. This is a major political event for the country.

#FrancePolitics, #USPolitics, #GovernmentCrisis, #JudicialReview, #PoliticalNews
https://newsletter.tf/france-govt-crisis-us-judge-row-political-turmoil/

High Court stays drug price marking order pending judicial review filed by MMA

KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court has granted a stay on the enforcement of the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering…
#NewsBeep #News #MMA #AU #Australia #Fighting #HighCourt #judicialreview #PriceMarkingforDrug #sports #stay #ThirunavukarasuRajoo
https://www.newsbeep.com/au/685123/

Complaints to the BBC and the prospect of a Judicial Review

Laura Kuenssberg interviewed Deputy Leader of Reform Richard Tice on Sunday. Kuenssberg pushed Tice on the Reform UK councillor who suggested “melting down Nigerians to fill pot holes”. Kuenssberg also pushed Tice on the astonishing private £5 million personal donation to Farage.

It is telling that Tice tried to dodge the questions.

During the interview, Richard Tice deflected criticism of Reform politicians by referring to the “anti-semitic Green Party”. Laura Kuenssberg ignored this and did not challenge it. Surely, when such offensive statements are made, the interviewer has a duty to challenge them and present the other side of the argument. I have complained to the BBC about this.

The Green Party have been called anti-semitic because they oppose the genocide and war crimes in Palestine. There is nothing anti-semitic about this. The many marches that have taken place calling for a Free Palestine are not hate marches and always include big contingents of Jewish people. To call the only political party in the UK with a Jewish leader “anti-semitic” is beyond the pale.

Richard Tice again referred to ‘Net Stupid Zero’ and, as always, the BBC said nothing about the consequences of that Reform UK policy. Unless the rich nations step up their commitment to replace fossil fuel use as soon as possible, we face climate tipping points such as the collapse of AMOC, leading to the collapse of our society and the death of billions of people.

You can see the interview here.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/26342046342157231

I have also complained about BBC Radio 4’s coverage of the Local Election campaigns.

BBC Radio 4 (and no doubt other stations) has been negligent in its lack of questioning of politicians on the climate catastrophe and the imminent threat of tipping points, such as the collapse of AMOC.

In the week preceding the May 7 election, Today interviewers didn’t ask party spokespeople questions about climate change, in spite of the fact that in the months leading up to the election the London School of Economics had published several reports on the fact that climate change will ‘hammer incomes and government budgets’ and that ‘climate change impacts are intensifying, yet adaptation efforts are not keeping pace with the scale and urgency of emerging risks.’
We face a national security risk, as outlined in the National Emergency Briefing, yet this is not being talked about on your programmes.

No party spokespeople were questioned or asked to comment on the fact that seven Reform-led councils have ‘scrapped’ their climate targets, and climate change denial has been expressed by Reform UK councillors in five councils. Some councils have removed content about climate change from strategy documents.’ (London School of Economics report). The BBC must prioritise discussion and debate of the National Emergency Briefing and force politicians to respond to it. Failing to do this means the BBC is part of the problem. The BBC should screen the National Emergency Briefing film on prime-time television as soon as possible.

I will keep you updated when I get replies to these complaints. Please help put pressure on the BBC to tell the full truth about the climate and nature emergencies and what is happening in Palestine. When you see or hear a programme that talks about climate change but fails to mention the most dangerous aspects of it, like the collapse of AMOC or the death of rainforests, make sure to send a complaint in. Likewise, when people are accused of anti-semitism for simply opposing the Israeli Government and the Genocide they are committing, send in a complaint. https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints

Meanwhile, Jonathon Fuller is making progress in the preparation for taking the BBC to Judicial Review.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BscvWCqgAmQ

Virginia Redistricting Ruling sparks dangerous clash between voter will and judicial power

https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/supreme-court/virginia-redistricting-ruling/

@petealexharris @simon_brooke Any such decision by the NI Secretary could be challenged only by #JudicialReview. The test applied would be #WednesburyUnreasonablenes (https://lawprof.co/definition/irrationality-wednesbury-unreasonableness/), which sets a high bar for overturning a decision.

But the bar is often topped. Judicial Review is often granted. Only in a minority of cases, but it's a non-trivial minority.

In simple terms, the SoS can push his luck, but not take the piss.

@petealexharris @simon_brooke Any such decision by the NI Secretary could be challenged only by #JudicialReview. The test applied would be #WednesburyUnreasonablenes (https://lawprof.co/definition/irrationality-wednesbury-unreasonableness/), which sets a high bar for overturning a decision.

But the bar is often topped. Judicial Review is often granted. Only in a minority of cases, but it's a non-trivial minority.

In simple terms, the SoS can push his luck, but not take the piss.

@petealexharris @simon_brooke Any such decision by the NI Secretary could be challenged only by #JudicialReview. The test applied would be #WednesburyUnreasonablenes (https://lawprof.co/definition/irrationality-wednesbury-unreasonableness/), which sets a high bar for overturning a decision.

But the bar is often topped. Judicial Review is often granted. Only in a minority of cases, but it's a non-trivial minority.

In simple terms, the SoS can push his luck, but not take the piss.

@petealexharris @simon_brooke Any such decision by the NI Secretary could be challenged only by #JudicialReview. The test applied would be #WednesburyUnreasonablenes (https://lawprof.co/definition/irrationality-wednesbury-unreasonableness/), which sets a high bar for overturning a decision.

But the bar is often topped. Judicial Review is often granted. Only in a minority of cases, but it's a non-trivial minority.

In simple terms, the SoS can push his luck, but not take the piss.

“Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

Please inform me

1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
   “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.

Type your email…

Subscribe

Related Posts

• “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”
• RED FLAG SHAM MARIAGES
• Is this why my daughter Emily is hidden from me?
• You all have been asking me about Emily.
• BBC Uncovers Epstein’s Abuse in Four London Flats

“Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

Please inform me

1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
   “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.

I telephoned Nationwide a complaint of this discussion under today’s date under reference COM00036660.

CMC M118 says the Defendant had not responded by 27 May 2025. That is the court’s own record. Unless that record is formally corrected, the Defendant’s later strike-out / summary judgment application is procedurally defective and should itself be struck out.

Related Posts

• The Fabian Society
• “The eleventh hour”
• Why was the Victims Minister contradicted on an Epstein public inquiry? — Evidence from Reuters
• Safeguarding: Did I Raise It – Or Did You Just Fail To Record & Assess It?
• Government Failures in Child Protection and child trafficking

“Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

Please inform me

1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
   “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.

Type your email…

Subscribe

Related Posts

• “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”
• RED FLAG SHAM MARIAGES
• Is this why my daughter Emily is hidden from me?
• You all have been asking me about Emily.
• BBC Uncovers Epstein’s Abuse in Four London Flats

“Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

Please inform me

1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
   “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.

Type your email…

Subscribe

Related Posts

• “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”
• RED FLAG SHAM MARIAGES
• Is this why my daughter Emily is hidden from me?
• You all have been asking me about Emily.
• BBC Uncovers Epstein’s Abuse in Four London Flats

R to @EUCourtPress: A landmark case confirming that the #EU is a “community based on the rule of law” ⚖️

Click here to learn more 👉
https://infocuria.curia.europa.eu/tabs/affair?publishedId=C-294/83

#EULaw #RuleOfLaw #JudicialReview

A landmark case confirming that the #EU is a “community based on the rule of law” ⚖️

Click here to learn more 👉
infocuria.curia.europa.eu/ta…

#EULaw #RuleOfLaw #JudicialReview
---
https://nitter.net/EUCourtPress/status/2047291956804440564#m

MAMDANI Act dangerous unconstitutional overreach threatens civil liberties

https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/u-s-politics/mamdani-act/

Election Interference in 2026 U.S. Midterms A Constitutional Stress Test

https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/elections/election-interference-in-2026-u-s-midterms/