#judicialreview — Public Fediverse posts

As Supreme Court decisions grow sharper, study examines justices’ concessions

https://www.umass.edu/news/article/supreme-court-decisions-grow-sharper-study-examines-justices-calculated-concessions

Comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49052625

#HackerNews #SupremeCourt #Justices #Concessions #LegalAnalysis #CourtDecisions #JudicialReview

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order in Major Election Authority Ruling

https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/elections/federal-judge-blocks-trump-voting-order/

New Post: What is the difference between Administrative Review and Judicial Review? https://immigrationbarrister.co.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-administrative-review-and-judicial-review/ #AdministrativeReview #ImmigrationsAppeal #JudicialReview

Global Fragility: Political Gridlock and Judicial Tension

France's govt faces crisis after Assembly vote. US sees 'MAGA judge' row. Who is affected? Voters and citizens in both countries.

#FrancePolitics, #USPolitics, #GovernmentCrisis, #JudicialReview, #PoliticalNews

https://newsletter.tf/france-govt-crisis-us-judge-row-political-turmoil/

France's government is in crisis after a vote in the National Assembly. This is a major political event for the country.

#FrancePolitics, #USPolitics, #GovernmentCrisis, #JudicialReview, #PoliticalNews
https://newsletter.tf/france-govt-crisis-us-judge-row-political-turmoil/

@petealexharris @simon_brooke Any such decision by the NI Secretary could be challenged only by #JudicialReview. The test applied would be #WednesburyUnreasonablenes (https://lawprof.co/definition/irrationality-wednesbury-unreasonableness/), which sets a high bar for overturning a decision.

But the bar is often topped. Judicial Review is often granted. Only in a minority of cases, but it's a non-trivial minority.

In simple terms, the SoS can push his luck, but not take the piss.

“Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”

A unknown judge siting in an unknown time and unknown room under in Brighton Court acting on behalf of the claim for the money I paid into Nationwide PLC and then went missing not given to my 19 years missing daughter caused by criminality alleged in another court 640MC413 you could not make this up under CCG0000122359 The just was quoted as stating “The claim is struck out and is marked as totally without merit.” Does he mean I had no child trust fund :

Letter from Nation Wide in regard to Emilys Trust Fund which this judge in the Money court said had no merit on fund ending” 057″ (“The CTF”)! The balance at the time being 1,013.45 when it was removed from my account app.

I have complaints to HM Courts who just send auto reply. Nations wide’s solicitors letter sent to the court said everyone would pay their own expenses.

HMCTS Complaint (ref: 82913701)

I am informed that to stop this order I have to spend more money to create a £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. when my claim in the money court was not me  within the 30 days  response which this court and solicitor later relied on in court breaching CPR

Please inform me

1. Check whether the £7,500 is a sealed court order, a solicitor’s demand, or just a costs schedule. Only a court order/judgment is immediately enforceable.
2. Ask the court urgently for copies of:
   “the application notice, supporting evidence, statement/schedule of costs, certificate of service, and the sealed order on which the £7,500 is based.”
3. If you were not served, consider an urgent N244 application asking the court to set aside/vary the £7,500 order and stay enforcement. GOV.UK says N244 is used to ask the court to set aside or vary a judgment or suspend enforcement. 

I am currently on a call to Action Fraud as this 2000 is a sum from what I have paid in to Nationwide – Child Trust Fund. My daughter has been missing 19 years and the court did this placing my daughter that according to Social Services Northern Ireland my daughter was never there. I have additionally supplied papers to this court without being given a name. Does this not breach CPR?

I telephoned the Financial Ombudsman and asked them when they sent a report court. They said they had not and no report had been made available to the judge under this case IC-485683-M0X9.

I telephoned Nationwide a complaint of this discussion under today’s date under reference COM00036660.

CMC M118 says the Defendant had not responded by 27 May 2025. That is the court’s own record. Unless that record is formally corrected, the Defendant’s later strike-out / summary judgment application is procedurally defective and should itself be struck out.

Related Posts

• The Fabian Society
• “The eleventh hour”
• Why was the Victims Minister contradicted on an Epstein public inquiry? — Evidence from Reuters
• Safeguarding: Did I Raise It – Or Did You Just Fail To Record & Assess It?
• Government Failures in Child Protection and child trafficking

R to @EUCourtPress: A landmark case confirming that the #EU is a “community based on the rule of law” ⚖️

Click here to learn more 👉
https://infocuria.curia.europa.eu/tabs/affair?publishedId=C-294/83

#EULaw #RuleOfLaw #JudicialReview

A landmark case confirming that the #EU is a “community based on the rule of law” ⚖️

Click here to learn more 👉
infocuria.curia.europa.eu/ta…

#EULaw #RuleOfLaw #JudicialReview
---
https://nitter.net/EUCourtPress/status/2047291956804440564#m

Trump Criticizes Supreme Court Justices Following Tariff Ruling

Donald Trump criticizes Supreme Court justices as 'embarrassment' and 'disgrace' after they blocked his tariffs in a 6-3 vote. Find out why.

#TrumpTariffs, #SupremeCourt, #JudicialReview, #ExecutivePower, #USPolitics

https://newsletter.tf/trump-criticizes-supreme-court-justices-tariff-ruling/

Former President Trump called Supreme Court justices an 'embarrassment' after they blocked his tariffs. This ruling limits presidential power.

#TrumpTariffs, #SupremeCourt, #JudicialReview, #ExecutivePower, #USPolitics

https://newsletter.tf/trump-criticizes-supreme-court-justices-tariff-ruling/

"Hundreds of judges across the nation have ruled over 4,400 times that President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement arm is detaining people unlawfully, according to a new Reuters review of court documents. And that’s just since October. "

#MassDetention #JudicialReview #DueProcess #ImmigrantRights #ICE
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/02/judges-reuters-immigration-detention/

@Sarahw "Innocent until proven guilty" is the principle in criminal cases. This is not a criminal case; it is a civil action, specifically a #judicialReview (JR).

In a judicial review, the principle is that government actions are presumed to be legal, unless a court finds otherwise.

Appeals are a good idea. A second set of eyes to independently assess whether the law has been applied correctly. But only a small proportion of cases get an appeal hearing.

@sean

“Palestine Action Judicial Review”

by Craig Murray in Craig’s Substack on Substack

@uk_politics

“I attach the full text of Lord Young’s decision granting the Scottish judicial review of the proscription of Palestine Action. [..] we have a realistic chance of success on our three grounds - failure to consult, disproportionate limitation of freedom of assembly, disproportionate limitation of freedom of speech”

https://open.substack.com/pub/craigmurrayorg/p/palestine-action-judicial-review

#Press #UK #PalAction #Scotland #JudicialReview #Murray

“A Step Towards Sanity”

by Craig Murray in Craig’s Substack on Substack

@uk_politics
@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@[email protected]

“To my great surprise, the video recording of yesterday’s Court of Session hearing on the a judicial review of the proscription of Palestine Action is still active on the court’s website & you can watch it. I do not know how long this will last”

https://open.substack.com/pub/craigmurrayorg/p/a-step-towards-sanity

#Press #UK #Scotland #Murray #PalestineAction #Proscription #JudicialReview #Hearing #Video #HumanRights

There is if course one way for the #UKgovernment to get out if this mess: to unban #PalestineAction.

Doing test themselves would of course be a surrender to PA and #DefendourJuries and to protesters like #GretaThunberg, but probably less damaging than keeping #Greta's high-profile as the central character.

The least embarrassing way for the #Ukgov to retreat would be to lose the #JudicialReview case against the ban. There is speculation that they are quietly trying to achieve that defeat.