home.social

#peter-mandelson — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #peter-mandelson, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Starmerin pääministeri­kausi päättyi nopeaan romahdukseen – näistä asioista hänet muistetaan

    Britannian väistyvän pääministerin Keir Starmerin loppu oli jyrkkä. Näistä asioista hänet muistetaan.

    yle.fi/a/74-20236604

    #Britannia #Politiikka #Kansainvälinenpolitiikka #Britannianpolitiikka #Keirstarmer #Pääministerit #Petermandelson #Donaldtrump #Työväenpuolueuk #Ulkomaat

  2. Starmerin pääministeri­kausi päättyi nopeaan romahdukseen – näistä asioista hänet muistetaan

    Britannian väistyvän pääministerin Keir Starmerin loppu oli jyrkkä. Näistä asioista hänet muistetaan.

    yle.fi/a/74-20236604

    #Britannia #Politiikka #Kansainvälinenpolitiikka #Britannianpolitiikka #Keirstarmer #Pääministerit #Petermandelson #Donaldtrump #Työväenpuolueuk #Ulkomaat

  3. Oxford Elite Circles: Epstein Hub Mapping elite networks and connections Evidence informs. Systems explain. Verify AI-generated content critically. #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard 6 July 2026 #GhislaineMaxwell #Borisjohnson #OxfordUniversity #PeterMandelson #JeffreyEpstein #ChildSexTraffickingRing

  4. Kiers Starmers abuse of Children and Parents a legacy

    There is a clear policy timeline in which family-court contact reforms and DfE safeguarding reforms altered the framework for parent-child contact and child protection reporting. My concern is that these powers can be misused where social care reports are exaggerated, selectively drafted, or ‘sexed up’, resulting in children being isolated from a parent without proper evidential scrutiny.

    Family court/contact reform — removal/repeal of the presumption that parental involvement is automatically in the child’s best interests. The public justification is child safety/domestic abuse, but your argument is that it can also be used to stop children speaking to a parent.

    “In October 2025, the Government announced its intention to repeal the statutory presumption of parental involvement. The stated justification was child safety and domestic abuse. My concern is that, without strong evidential safeguards, the same change may also be used to justify preventing children from speaking to a parent on the basis of contested or exaggerated social care material.”

    Cite

    1. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-action-to-protect-children-from-abusive-parents and
    2. https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2025-10-22/hlws976

    DfE social care reforms — DfE is responsible for child protection policy and statutory guidance, and 2026 changes strengthen multi-agency safeguarding, information sharing, family help, and child protection teams. Your allegation — that those mechanisms create the conditions for “sexed-up” social care reports: risk language, safeguarding labels, and professional assertions being used to justify separation or non-contact.

    DfE’s note on multi-agency child protection teams says the Bill requires those teams to support local authorities in discharging child protection duties under section 47 of the Children Act 1989, while local authorities remain responsible for enquiries and decisions about action to protect a child.

    Cite

    1. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-safeguard-children–2
    2. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/multi-agency-child-protection-teams-regulation-making-powers/multi-agency-child-protection-teams-regulation-making-powers

    Government immigration and public health policies should ensure appropriate health screening and disease control measures to minimise the risk of importing infectious diseases and protect the wider population.

    1. Communications were sent to the Prime Minister’s office / Cabinet Office and were not answered.

    2. At the same time, the oversight route you were expected to use — the LGSO/LGSCO — had been weakened by lack of funding or investigation capacity.

    The state cannot lawfully ignore safeguarding communications while also leaving the oversight body under-resourced or unable to investigate. That creates an accountability gap.

    For the record: I have contacted 640 MPs regarding my missing daughter, Emily, and I have received a reply from each MP. This matter is now also part of my complaint to the Department for Education. Approximately 640 MPs were contacted regarding a safeguarding concern relating to Emily Newbold and wider child traceability issues. This generated approximately 3,200 email responses, acknowledgements, referrals, constituency notices and office replies. None of those responses addressed the core safeguarding question or provided confirmation of Emily Newbold’s location, safeguarding status, education status, NHS status, or traceability through public systems.

    Previous Communication Evidence.

    1. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps.php
    2. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_missing_emily.php
    3. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_shadowban_video.php
    4. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_missing_emily_please_contact%20DFE.php
    5. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_parliamentary_mp_safeguarding_epstein_bbc.php
    6. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_surrey_police_non_safe_guarding_of_mps.php

    Mail sent out to MP’s today

    • formal notice of safeguarding concerns
    • asking whether Emily Newbold is alive, safe, or deceased
    • asking for police/professional standards reference numbers
    • arguing that failure to act may enable continuing risk asking MPs and police to preserve audit trails and routing decisions
    • reference to mandamus / mandatory order language
    June 26, 2026

    Related Posts

    Mistakes in Child Protection: An Open Letter to Social Work England

    by Martin NewboldJune 25, 2026

    Prime minister Apologized to Epstein Victims

    by Martin NewboldJune 20, 2026

    Fabian Society Members in the Labour Party (2026)

    by Martin NewboldJune 14, 2026 #adoption #childWelfare #children #CLINTON #courtCrisis #education #EpsteinFiles #family #familyCourt #familyLaw #humanRights #jeffreyEpstein #MattDunkley #mentalHealth #News #parenting #PeterMandelson #politics #SirKierStarmerPM #StarmersLegacy #TonyBlair
  5. Kiers Starmers abuse of Children and Parents a legacy

    There is a clear policy timeline in which family-court contact reforms and DfE safeguarding reforms altered the framework for parent-child contact and child protection reporting. My concern is that these powers can be misused where social care reports are exaggerated, selectively drafted, or ‘sexed up’, resulting in children being isolated from a parent without proper evidential scrutiny.

    Family court/contact reform — removal/repeal of the presumption that parental involvement is automatically in the child’s best interests. The public justification is child safety/domestic abuse, but your argument is that it can also be used to stop children speaking to a parent.

    “In October 2025, the Government announced its intention to repeal the statutory presumption of parental involvement. The stated justification was child safety and domestic abuse. My concern is that, without strong evidential safeguards, the same change may also be used to justify preventing children from speaking to a parent on the basis of contested or exaggerated social care material.”

    Cite

    1. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-action-to-protect-children-from-abusive-parents and
    2. https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2025-10-22/hlws976

    DfE social care reforms — DfE is responsible for child protection policy and statutory guidance, and 2026 changes strengthen multi-agency safeguarding, information sharing, family help, and child protection teams. Your allegation — that those mechanisms create the conditions for “sexed-up” social care reports: risk language, safeguarding labels, and professional assertions being used to justify separation or non-contact.

    DfE’s note on multi-agency child protection teams says the Bill requires those teams to support local authorities in discharging child protection duties under section 47 of the Children Act 1989, while local authorities remain responsible for enquiries and decisions about action to protect a child.

    Cite

    1. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-safeguard-children–2
    2. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/multi-agency-child-protection-teams-regulation-making-powers/multi-agency-child-protection-teams-regulation-making-powers

    Government immigration and public health policies should ensure appropriate health screening and disease control measures to minimise the risk of importing infectious diseases and protect the wider population.

    1. Communications were sent to the Prime Minister’s office / Cabinet Office and were not answered.

    2. At the same time, the oversight route you were expected to use — the LGSO/LGSCO — had been weakened by lack of funding or investigation capacity.

    The state cannot lawfully ignore safeguarding communications while also leaving the oversight body under-resourced or unable to investigate. That creates an accountability gap.

    For the record: I have contacted 640 MPs regarding my missing daughter, Emily, and I have received a reply from each MP. This matter is now also part of my complaint to the Department for Education. Approximately 640 MPs were contacted regarding a safeguarding concern relating to Emily Newbold and wider child traceability issues. This generated approximately 3,200 email responses, acknowledgements, referrals, constituency notices and office replies. None of those responses addressed the core safeguarding question or provided confirmation of Emily Newbold’s location, safeguarding status, education status, NHS status, or traceability through public systems.

    Previous Communication Evidence.

    1. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps.php
    2. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_missing_emily.php
    3. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_shadowban_video.php
    4. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_missing_emily_please_contact%20DFE.php
    5. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_parliamentary_mp_safeguarding_epstein_bbc.php
    6. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_surrey_police_non_safe_guarding_of_mps.php

    Mail sent out to MP’s today

    • formal notice of safeguarding concerns
    • asking whether Emily Newbold is alive, safe, or deceased
    • asking for police/professional standards reference numbers
    • arguing that failure to act may enable continuing risk asking MPs and police to preserve audit trails and routing decisions
    • reference to mandamus / mandatory order language
    June 26, 2026

    Related Posts

    Mistakes in Child Protection: An Open Letter to Social Work England

    by Martin NewboldJune 25, 2026

    Prime minister Apologized to Epstein Victims

    by Martin NewboldJune 20, 2026

    Fabian Society Members in the Labour Party (2026)

    by Martin NewboldJune 14, 2026 #adoption #childWelfare #children #CLINTON #courtCrisis #education #EpsteinFiles #family #familyCourt #familyLaw #humanRights #jeffreyEpstein #MattDunkley #mentalHealth #News #parenting #PeterMandelson #politics #SirKierStarmerPM #StarmersLegacy #TonyBlair
  6. "When historians and commentators look back, it won’t be the workers’ rights or the nationalised railways that define his premiership; instead, it will be Gaza, winter fuel, and Peter Mandelson that stick in the public memory."

    feminegra.com/keir-starmers-re

    #UKPol #UKPolitics #KeirStarmer #Starmer #BlueLabour #PeterMandelson #Labour

  7. "When historians and commentators look back, it won’t be the workers’ rights or the nationalised railways that define his premiership; instead, it will be Gaza, winter fuel, and Peter Mandelson that stick in the public memory."

    feminegra.com/keir-starmers-re

    #UKPol #UKPolitics #KeirStarmer #Starmer #BlueLabour #PeterMandelson #Labour

  8. `How is the son-in-law of a sitting president permitted to manage billions of dollars from foreign sovereign investors while simultaneously pursuing major development projects at one of NATO's most strategically sensitive maritime gateways?`

    #Albania #Sazan #Ivanka #Trump #JaredKushner #corruption #Rothschild #Montenegro #Qatar #CIA #Epstein #EpsteinFiles #PeterMandelson #JesStale #JPMorgan #TomBarrack #Fier #gas #energy #SOCAR #EhudBarak #Israel #Netanyahu #NATO

    kaitjustice.substack.com/p/iva

  9. `How is the son-in-law of a sitting president permitted to manage billions of dollars from foreign sovereign investors while simultaneously pursuing major development projects at one of NATO's most strategically sensitive maritime gateways?`

    #Albania #Sazan #Ivanka #Trump #JaredKushner #corruption #Rothschild #Montenegro #Qatar #CIA #Epstein #EpsteinFiles #PeterMandelson #JesStale #JPMorgan #TomBarrack #Fier #gas #energy #SOCAR #EhudBarak #Israel #Netanyahu #NATO

    kaitjustice.substack.com/p/iva

  10. Are these separate cohorts, or the same children being counted under different labels?

    That is the key audit demand. Not “give me another headline number,” but:

    Are the 500,000, the 758,000, and the “moved on / raised elsewhere” children the same cohort, overlapping cohorts, or separate cohorts?

    And if the system relies on poor data, ePEP/Gary Daniels-type records, virtual school removals, “moved on” coding, or missing education categories, then the risk is:

    children are not missing from life — they are missing from accountable systems.

    Use this line:

    I require DfE to provide a reconciliation table showing whether the 500,000 cohort, the 758,000 cohort, and the children recorded as “moved on” are identical, overlapping, or separate cohorts, and to name the system and officer responsible for confirming each child’s current traceability status.

    This is no longer capable of being treated as bureaucratic failure. Where children remain untraced after repeated safeguarding notice, and authorities refuse to name responsibility or provide a traceability route, the matter must be investigated as suspected child sexual exploitation, institutional concealment, and criminal safeguarding failure.

    “If people with power were repeatedly warned about child safeguarding and traceability concerns and chose not to act, then the failure is so serious that it cannot be brushed aside as mere incompetence.”

    If 640 MPs were notified of a child traceability and safeguarding concern and none provided a substantive safeguarding route, named officer, referral, or protective action, then Parliament has collectively failed its safeguarding function. That failure must be treated as potential institutional complicity, concealment, or gross neglect until properly investigated.

    Their failure to answer a child traceability and safeguarding question after notice is now evidence of obstruction, concealment, or institutional non-compliance, and must be investigated.

    I allege a direct cause-and-effect safeguarding concern: Epstein-linked access networks entered UK political institutions through Mandelson and Blair-era Labour channels, continued into later Labour/Treasury access, and coincided with unresolved mass child traceability failures. The state must now disclose the records and prove there is no connection.

    June 5, 2026

    Related Posts

    Sir Keir Starmer knows the figure – so why can he not locate them?

    by Martin NewboldJune 4, 2026

    One Blair Reference? Really? – Was Blair Only Associated With Mandelson Once?

    by Martin NewboldJune 3, 2026

    Obfuscation of the Humble address

    by Martin NewboldJune 1, 2026 #adoption #childWelfare #children #courtCrisis #familyLaw #history #IBACSirKierStarmerPM #law #mentalHealth #News #PeterMandelson #politics #TonyBlair
  11. Are these separate cohorts, or the same children being counted under different labels?

    That is the key audit demand. Not “give me another headline number,” but:

    Are the 500,000, the 758,000, and the “moved on / raised elsewhere” children the same cohort, overlapping cohorts, or separate cohorts?

    And if the system relies on poor data, ePEP/Gary Daniels-type records, virtual school removals, “moved on” coding, or missing education categories, then the risk is:

    children are not missing from life — they are missing from accountable systems.

    Use this line:

    I require DfE to provide a reconciliation table showing whether the 500,000 cohort, the 758,000 cohort, and the children recorded as “moved on” are identical, overlapping, or separate cohorts, and to name the system and officer responsible for confirming each child’s current traceability status.

    This is no longer capable of being treated as bureaucratic failure. Where children remain untraced after repeated safeguarding notice, and authorities refuse to name responsibility or provide a traceability route, the matter must be investigated as suspected child sexual exploitation, institutional concealment, and criminal safeguarding failure.

    “If people with power were repeatedly warned about child safeguarding and traceability concerns and chose not to act, then the failure is so serious that it cannot be brushed aside as mere incompetence.”

    If 640 MPs were notified of a child traceability and safeguarding concern and none provided a substantive safeguarding route, named officer, referral, or protective action, then Parliament has collectively failed its safeguarding function. That failure must be treated as potential institutional complicity, concealment, or gross neglect until properly investigated.

    Their failure to answer a child traceability and safeguarding question after notice is now evidence of obstruction, concealment, or institutional non-compliance, and must be investigated.

    I allege a direct cause-and-effect safeguarding concern: Epstein-linked access networks entered UK political institutions through Mandelson and Blair-era Labour channels, continued into later Labour/Treasury access, and coincided with unresolved mass child traceability failures. The state must now disclose the records and prove there is no connection.

    June 5, 2026

    Related Posts

    Sir Keir Starmer knows the figure – so why can he not locate them?

    by Martin NewboldJune 4, 2026

    One Blair Reference? Really? – Was Blair Only Associated With Mandelson Once?

    by Martin NewboldJune 3, 2026

    Obfuscation of the Humble address

    by Martin NewboldJune 1, 2026 #adoption #childWelfare #children #courtCrisis #familyLaw #history #IBACSirKierStarmerPM #law #mentalHealth #News #PeterMandelson #politics #TonyBlair
  12. MANDELSON FILES RELEASE: EXPECT 'EMBARRASSING' WHATSAPPS, NOT VETTING REPORTS

    Peter Mandelson documents to be released. Expect personal WhatsApp messages, not official vetting reports. Find out what this means for public trust.

    #MandelsonFiles, #PeterMandelson, #WhatsAppLeak, #UKPolitics, #Transparency

    newsletter.tf/mandelson-docume

  13. LIVE: UK PM Starmer takes questions in parliament on Mandelson

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer takes questions in parliament before a general debate on the UK government's response to the Humble Address on the appointment of Peter Mandelson. Britain's government released reams of documents on June 1 relating to the appointment of Mandelson as ambassador to the United States. #keirstarmer #petermandelson #uk #westminster #britain #epsteinfiles #live #Reuters #News

    fllics.com/en/video/live-uk-pm

  14. LIVE: UK PM Starmer takes questions in parliament on Mandelson

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer takes questions in parliament before a general debate on the UK government's response to the Humble Address on the appointment of Peter Mandelson. Britain's government released reams of documents on June 1 relating to the appointment of Mandelson as ambassador to the United States. #keirstarmer #petermandelson #uk #westminster #britain #epsteinfiles #live #Reuters #News

    fllics.com/en/video/live-uk-pm

  15. Starmer is “simply not there.”

    “Almost two years in, it is impossible to think of a single thing the government has done that has had the effect of increasing growth – supposedly its central policy. It is regrettably possible to think of a number of things it has done that have hampered or depressed growth.”

    theguardian.com/commentisfree/

    #Starmer #Labour #PeterMandelson

  16. Starmer is “simply not there.”

    “Almost two years in, it is impossible to think of a single thing the government has done that has had the effect of increasing growth – supposedly its central policy. It is regrettably possible to think of a number of things it has done that have hampered or depressed growth.”

    theguardian.com/commentisfree/

    #Starmer #Labour #PeterMandelson

  17. A through back to a cartoon from last month, featuring Keir Starmer as a nuclear sub and a torpedo with a certain individuals name on it.

    #PeterMandelson #Politics #UkNews #Lobbying #Labour #Business #Mandelson

  18. As the Peter Mandelson affair continues to develop, a bit like a fast growing knotweed, here is the Guardian's quick summation of the currently live revelations.... of which the best has to be Mandelson telling David Lammy he would not regret appointing him (Mandelson, that is); well, that certainly turned out well!

    #politics #PeterMandelson

    theguardian.com/politics/2026/

  19. To the Epstein Class 'maturity' means 'allowing a genocide to happen, and punishing those who point it out'

    Imagine being so awful that Wes fucking Streeting looks human in comparison!

    #EpsteinClass #WesStreeting #PeterMandelson #MandelsonFiles #Genocide #Sociopathy #PatMcFadden