home.social

#surveillance — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #surveillance, aggregated by home.social.

  1. smart kitchen knife with Wi-Fi & BLE was at least a bit funny.

    Dyson's announced smart toothbrush is just pure rage. this company:
    - trained AI on HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of dental images (which already raises serious privacy questions);
    - then put said AI into a toothbrush;
    - then added camera inside toothbrush (along with Wi-Fi, BLE & RFID);
    - and charged $500 dollars for this

    #Privacy #InternetOfShit #InternetOfThings #IoT #Tech #Technology #AI #NoAI #ArtificialIntelligence #Surveillance

  2. smart kitchen knife with Wi-Fi & BLE was at least a bit funny.

    Dyson's announced smart toothbrush is just pure rage. this company:
    - trained AI on HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of dental images (which already raises serious privacy questions);
    - then put said AI into a toothbrush;
    - then added camera inside toothbrush (along with Wi-Fi, BLE & RFID);
    - and charged $500 dollars for this

  3. smart kitchen knife with Wi-Fi & BLE was at least a bit funny.

    Dyson's announced smart toothbrush is just pure rage. this company:
    - trained AI on HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of dental images (which already raises serious privacy questions);
    - then put said AI into a toothbrush;
    - then added camera inside toothbrush (along with Wi-Fi, BLE & RFID);
    - and charged $500 dollars for this

    #Privacy #InternetOfShit #InternetOfThings #IoT #Tech #Technology #AI #NoAI #ArtificialIntelligence #Surveillance

  4. smart kitchen knife with Wi-Fi & BLE was at least a bit funny.

    Dyson's announced smart toothbrush is just pure rage. this company:
    - trained AI on HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of dental images (which already raises serious privacy questions);
    - then put said AI into a toothbrush;
    - then added camera inside toothbrush (along with Wi-Fi, BLE & RFID);
    - and charged $500 dollars for this

    #Privacy #InternetOfShit #InternetOfThings #IoT #Tech #Technology #AI #NoAI #ArtificialIntelligence #Surveillance

  5. smart kitchen knife with Wi-Fi & BLE was at least a bit funny.

    Dyson's announced smart toothbrush is just pure rage. this company:
    - trained AI on HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of dental images (which already raises serious privacy questions);
    - then put said AI into a toothbrush;
    - then added camera inside toothbrush (along with Wi-Fi, BLE & RFID);
    - and charged $500 dollars for this

    #Privacy #InternetOfShit #InternetOfThings #IoT #Tech #Technology #AI #NoAI #ArtificialIntelligence #Surveillance

  6. I have only seen the first 15 minutes of the new video by #GamersNexus ("216,000,000 Spy TVs | The LG Smart TV Problem") and oh boy this shit is scary. Watch it right now: youtube.com/watch?v=6IFVTcM28KA

    #Surveillance #SmartTV

  7. 🕵️ Latest from #Surveillance #Technology Oversight Project (S.T.O.P.) #NYC

    “Learn the basics of how to protect your rights against surveillance at S․T․O․P․'s next Power Down webinar, September 16 from 3 to 4 p․m․

    Register here: us02web․zoom․us/webinar/register/WN_TLx8xk2gQxCYaI7s1r3N3A?_x_zm_…”

    bsky.app/profile/stopspyingny.

    🤖 via RSS feed. May not reflect our views.

  8. A group of office workers in a cyberpunk city stand up against internet censorship and authoritarian control, fighting for digital freedom and democratic values.

    #censorship #freedom #privacy #protest #surveillance

  9. Fear and Loathing of AI (Part V): The Real Product Isn’t AI — It’s Compliance

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News — with OpenAI ChatGPT

    Every major technology claims to sell capability.

    What it actually sells is behavior.

    Artificial intelligence is marketed as intelligence, automation, assistance, and insight. But those are not the real product. They are the wrapper.

    The real product is compliance.

    From tools to rulebooks

    AI systems do not merely help people work. They define how work is allowed to happen.

    They decide:

    • what is acceptable output,
    • what counts as efficiency,
    • what language is permitted,
    • what pace is required,
    • what deviation triggers review.

    Once embedded, these systems stop being optional tools and start functioning as invisible rulebooks.

    You are not just using AI.
    You are being shaped by it.

    Normalizing the machine’s priorities

    AI systems optimize for what they can measure.

    That sounds neutral. It isn’t.

    What gets measured becomes what matters:

    • speed over care,
    • volume over judgment,
    • consistency over insight,
    • compliance over discretion.

    Human nuance becomes noise.
    Context becomes friction.

    Over time, workers internalize this logic. They adjust themselves to match the system rather than questioning whether the system is correct.

    That is not assistance.
    That is conditioning.

    Consent by exhaustion

    Most people do not choose compliance.

    They accept it because resisting it is exhausting.

    Opting out means:

    • losing access,
    • losing income,
    • losing relevance,
    • losing visibility.

    So people adapt. Quietly. Incrementally. Rationally.

    Each update narrows the corridor.
    Each “improvement” reduces discretion.
    Each convenience carries a hidden obligation.

    Eventually, compliance feels like normal work.

    The illusion of neutrality

    AI is often described as objective.

    But every AI system encodes:

    • institutional priorities,
    • business incentives,
    • legal risk tolerance,
    • and managerial worldview.

    Those values are not debated by users.
    They are imposed through interfaces.

    When people are told “the system decided,” accountability dissolves. Authority becomes abstract. Power becomes deniable.

    No one is responsible.
    Everyone must comply.

    Why this matters more than jobs

    Job loss is visible.
    Compliance is subtle.

    A workforce that still exists but no longer questions:

    • pacing,
    • evaluation,
    • fairness,
    • or purpose

    is easier to manage than one that resists.

    The danger is not a future without work.

    It is a future where work continues, but autonomy does not.

    The quiet trade

    AI offers convenience in exchange for conformity.

    For many, that trade feels necessary. Sometimes it is.

    But it should never be invisible.

    Because once compliance is normalized, reclaiming discretion becomes almost impossible.

    A line that still exists

    AI can be useful without being authoritative.
    It can assist without dictating.
    It can serve without ruling.

    But that only happens when:

    • systems remain accountable,
    • humans retain override power,
    • and institutions are forced to justify decisions.

    Without those limits, AI doesn’t just change work.

    It trains people to accept less agency as the price of participation.

    That is not progress.

    That is control, automated.

    For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

    #AIGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #automation #compliance #futureOfWork #Labor #Occupy25 #platformCapitalism #Surveillance #technologyCritique #workplaceControl #WPSNews
  10. Fear and Loathing of AI (Part V): The Real Product Isn’t AI — It’s Compliance

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News — with OpenAI ChatGPT

    Every major technology claims to sell capability.

    What it actually sells is behavior.

    Artificial intelligence is marketed as intelligence, automation, assistance, and insight. But those are not the real product. They are the wrapper.

    The real product is compliance.

    From tools to rulebooks

    AI systems do not merely help people work. They define how work is allowed to happen.

    They decide:

    • what is acceptable output,
    • what counts as efficiency,
    • what language is permitted,
    • what pace is required,
    • what deviation triggers review.

    Once embedded, these systems stop being optional tools and start functioning as invisible rulebooks.

    You are not just using AI.
    You are being shaped by it.

    Normalizing the machine’s priorities

    AI systems optimize for what they can measure.

    That sounds neutral. It isn’t.

    What gets measured becomes what matters:

    • speed over care,
    • volume over judgment,
    • consistency over insight,
    • compliance over discretion.

    Human nuance becomes noise.
    Context becomes friction.

    Over time, workers internalize this logic. They adjust themselves to match the system rather than questioning whether the system is correct.

    That is not assistance.
    That is conditioning.

    Consent by exhaustion

    Most people do not choose compliance.

    They accept it because resisting it is exhausting.

    Opting out means:

    • losing access,
    • losing income,
    • losing relevance,
    • losing visibility.

    So people adapt. Quietly. Incrementally. Rationally.

    Each update narrows the corridor.
    Each “improvement” reduces discretion.
    Each convenience carries a hidden obligation.

    Eventually, compliance feels like normal work.

    The illusion of neutrality

    AI is often described as objective.

    But every AI system encodes:

    • institutional priorities,
    • business incentives,
    • legal risk tolerance,
    • and managerial worldview.

    Those values are not debated by users.
    They are imposed through interfaces.

    When people are told “the system decided,” accountability dissolves. Authority becomes abstract. Power becomes deniable.

    No one is responsible.
    Everyone must comply.

    Why this matters more than jobs

    Job loss is visible.
    Compliance is subtle.

    A workforce that still exists but no longer questions:

    • pacing,
    • evaluation,
    • fairness,
    • or purpose

    is easier to manage than one that resists.

    The danger is not a future without work.

    It is a future where work continues, but autonomy does not.

    The quiet trade

    AI offers convenience in exchange for conformity.

    For many, that trade feels necessary. Sometimes it is.

    But it should never be invisible.

    Because once compliance is normalized, reclaiming discretion becomes almost impossible.

    A line that still exists

    AI can be useful without being authoritative.
    It can assist without dictating.
    It can serve without ruling.

    But that only happens when:

    • systems remain accountable,
    • humans retain override power,
    • and institutions are forced to justify decisions.

    Without those limits, AI doesn’t just change work.

    It trains people to accept less agency as the price of participation.

    That is not progress.

    That is control, automated.

    For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

    #AIGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #automation #compliance #futureOfWork #Labor #Occupy25 #platformCapitalism #Surveillance #technologyCritique #workplaceControl #WPSNews
  11. Fear and Loathing of AI (Part V): The Real Product Isn’t AI — It’s Compliance

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News — with OpenAI ChatGPT

    Every major technology claims to sell capability.

    What it actually sells is behavior.

    Artificial intelligence is marketed as intelligence, automation, assistance, and insight. But those are not the real product. They are the wrapper.

    The real product is compliance.

    From tools to rulebooks

    AI systems do not merely help people work. They define how work is allowed to happen.

    They decide:

    • what is acceptable output,
    • what counts as efficiency,
    • what language is permitted,
    • what pace is required,
    • what deviation triggers review.

    Once embedded, these systems stop being optional tools and start functioning as invisible rulebooks.

    You are not just using AI.
    You are being shaped by it.

    Normalizing the machine’s priorities

    AI systems optimize for what they can measure.

    That sounds neutral. It isn’t.

    What gets measured becomes what matters:

    • speed over care,
    • volume over judgment,
    • consistency over insight,
    • compliance over discretion.

    Human nuance becomes noise.
    Context becomes friction.

    Over time, workers internalize this logic. They adjust themselves to match the system rather than questioning whether the system is correct.

    That is not assistance.
    That is conditioning.

    Consent by exhaustion

    Most people do not choose compliance.

    They accept it because resisting it is exhausting.

    Opting out means:

    • losing access,
    • losing income,
    • losing relevance,
    • losing visibility.

    So people adapt. Quietly. Incrementally. Rationally.

    Each update narrows the corridor.
    Each “improvement” reduces discretion.
    Each convenience carries a hidden obligation.

    Eventually, compliance feels like normal work.

    The illusion of neutrality

    AI is often described as objective.

    But every AI system encodes:

    • institutional priorities,
    • business incentives,
    • legal risk tolerance,
    • and managerial worldview.

    Those values are not debated by users.
    They are imposed through interfaces.

    When people are told “the system decided,” accountability dissolves. Authority becomes abstract. Power becomes deniable.

    No one is responsible.
    Everyone must comply.

    Why this matters more than jobs

    Job loss is visible.
    Compliance is subtle.

    A workforce that still exists but no longer questions:

    • pacing,
    • evaluation,
    • fairness,
    • or purpose

    is easier to manage than one that resists.

    The danger is not a future without work.

    It is a future where work continues, but autonomy does not.

    The quiet trade

    AI offers convenience in exchange for conformity.

    For many, that trade feels necessary. Sometimes it is.

    But it should never be invisible.

    Because once compliance is normalized, reclaiming discretion becomes almost impossible.

    A line that still exists

    AI can be useful without being authoritative.
    It can assist without dictating.
    It can serve without ruling.

    But that only happens when:

    • systems remain accountable,
    • humans retain override power,
    • and institutions are forced to justify decisions.

    Without those limits, AI doesn’t just change work.

    It trains people to accept less agency as the price of participation.

    That is not progress.

    That is control, automated.

    For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

    #AIGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #automation #compliance #futureOfWork #Labor #Occupy25 #platformCapitalism #Surveillance #technologyCritique #workplaceControl #WPSNews
  12. Fear and Loathing of AI (Part V): The Real Product Isn’t AI — It’s Compliance

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News — with OpenAI ChatGPT

    Every major technology claims to sell capability.

    What it actually sells is behavior.

    Artificial intelligence is marketed as intelligence, automation, assistance, and insight. But those are not the real product. They are the wrapper.

    The real product is compliance.

    From tools to rulebooks

    AI systems do not merely help people work. They define how work is allowed to happen.

    They decide:

    • what is acceptable output,
    • what counts as efficiency,
    • what language is permitted,
    • what pace is required,
    • what deviation triggers review.

    Once embedded, these systems stop being optional tools and start functioning as invisible rulebooks.

    You are not just using AI.
    You are being shaped by it.

    Normalizing the machine’s priorities

    AI systems optimize for what they can measure.

    That sounds neutral. It isn’t.

    What gets measured becomes what matters:

    • speed over care,
    • volume over judgment,
    • consistency over insight,
    • compliance over discretion.

    Human nuance becomes noise.
    Context becomes friction.

    Over time, workers internalize this logic. They adjust themselves to match the system rather than questioning whether the system is correct.

    That is not assistance.
    That is conditioning.

    Consent by exhaustion

    Most people do not choose compliance.

    They accept it because resisting it is exhausting.

    Opting out means:

    • losing access,
    • losing income,
    • losing relevance,
    • losing visibility.

    So people adapt. Quietly. Incrementally. Rationally.

    Each update narrows the corridor.
    Each “improvement” reduces discretion.
    Each convenience carries a hidden obligation.

    Eventually, compliance feels like normal work.

    The illusion of neutrality

    AI is often described as objective.

    But every AI system encodes:

    • institutional priorities,
    • business incentives,
    • legal risk tolerance,
    • and managerial worldview.

    Those values are not debated by users.
    They are imposed through interfaces.

    When people are told “the system decided,” accountability dissolves. Authority becomes abstract. Power becomes deniable.

    No one is responsible.
    Everyone must comply.

    Why this matters more than jobs

    Job loss is visible.
    Compliance is subtle.

    A workforce that still exists but no longer questions:

    • pacing,
    • evaluation,
    • fairness,
    • or purpose

    is easier to manage than one that resists.

    The danger is not a future without work.

    It is a future where work continues, but autonomy does not.

    The quiet trade

    AI offers convenience in exchange for conformity.

    For many, that trade feels necessary. Sometimes it is.

    But it should never be invisible.

    Because once compliance is normalized, reclaiming discretion becomes almost impossible.

    A line that still exists

    AI can be useful without being authoritative.
    It can assist without dictating.
    It can serve without ruling.

    But that only happens when:

    • systems remain accountable,
    • humans retain override power,
    • and institutions are forced to justify decisions.

    Without those limits, AI doesn’t just change work.

    It trains people to accept less agency as the price of participation.

    That is not progress.

    That is control, automated.

    For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

    #AIGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #automation #compliance #futureOfWork #Labor #Occupy25 #platformCapitalism #Surveillance #technologyCritique #workplaceControl #WPSNews
  13. Fear and Loathing of AI (Part V): The Real Product Isn’t AI — It’s Compliance

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News — with OpenAI ChatGPT

    Every major technology claims to sell capability.

    What it actually sells is behavior.

    Artificial intelligence is marketed as intelligence, automation, assistance, and insight. But those are not the real product. They are the wrapper.

    The real product is compliance.

    From tools to rulebooks

    AI systems do not merely help people work. They define how work is allowed to happen.

    They decide:

    • what is acceptable output,
    • what counts as efficiency,
    • what language is permitted,
    • what pace is required,
    • what deviation triggers review.

    Once embedded, these systems stop being optional tools and start functioning as invisible rulebooks.

    You are not just using AI.
    You are being shaped by it.

    Normalizing the machine’s priorities

    AI systems optimize for what they can measure.

    That sounds neutral. It isn’t.

    What gets measured becomes what matters:

    • speed over care,
    • volume over judgment,
    • consistency over insight,
    • compliance over discretion.

    Human nuance becomes noise.
    Context becomes friction.

    Over time, workers internalize this logic. They adjust themselves to match the system rather than questioning whether the system is correct.

    That is not assistance.
    That is conditioning.

    Consent by exhaustion

    Most people do not choose compliance.

    They accept it because resisting it is exhausting.

    Opting out means:

    • losing access,
    • losing income,
    • losing relevance,
    • losing visibility.

    So people adapt. Quietly. Incrementally. Rationally.

    Each update narrows the corridor.
    Each “improvement” reduces discretion.
    Each convenience carries a hidden obligation.

    Eventually, compliance feels like normal work.

    The illusion of neutrality

    AI is often described as objective.

    But every AI system encodes:

    • institutional priorities,
    • business incentives,
    • legal risk tolerance,
    • and managerial worldview.

    Those values are not debated by users.
    They are imposed through interfaces.

    When people are told “the system decided,” accountability dissolves. Authority becomes abstract. Power becomes deniable.

    No one is responsible.
    Everyone must comply.

    Why this matters more than jobs

    Job loss is visible.
    Compliance is subtle.

    A workforce that still exists but no longer questions:

    • pacing,
    • evaluation,
    • fairness,
    • or purpose

    is easier to manage than one that resists.

    The danger is not a future without work.

    It is a future where work continues, but autonomy does not.

    The quiet trade

    AI offers convenience in exchange for conformity.

    For many, that trade feels necessary. Sometimes it is.

    But it should never be invisible.

    Because once compliance is normalized, reclaiming discretion becomes almost impossible.

    A line that still exists

    AI can be useful without being authoritative.
    It can assist without dictating.
    It can serve without ruling.

    But that only happens when:

    • systems remain accountable,
    • humans retain override power,
    • and institutions are forced to justify decisions.

    Without those limits, AI doesn’t just change work.

    It trains people to accept less agency as the price of participation.

    That is not progress.

    That is control, automated.

    For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

    #AIGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #automation #compliance #futureOfWork #Labor #Occupy25 #platformCapitalism #Surveillance #technologyCritique #workplaceControl #WPSNews
  14. “In May, Wyden, Harrigan, and a bipartisan group of 12 other members of Congress released details about how commercially purchased location data – often captured by mobile apps and #advertising SDKs – can be used to identify where US military personnel gather and to target those #locations They noted that the DoD has been aware of this threat since at least 2016”

    #AdTech / #Spyware / #surveillance <theregister.com/public-sector/>

  15. CW: This image may contain mature or explicit content.

    Two men in a secret hideout, lost in a moment of intimacy.

    #NSFW #erotic #intimacy #seduction #surveillance #nighttime

  16. From #GamersNexus: “216,000,000 Spy TVs | The LG Smart TV Problem.”

    LG TVs watch, analyze, and report on what’s on your screen. They record and report on conversations in range of the microphone, even without a wake word (technically, after a false positive or after an unreasonable delay after the wake word, or 60 ft away across a building). They scan and report on other devices on your network, and other networks in your vicinity. And unplugging them from your network may not be enough to stop them.

    LG does exactly what you’d expect with all that data, and more you may not have imagined yet if you haven’t watched enough Black Mirror episodes.

    youtube.com/watch?v=6IFVTcM28KA

    #infosec #security #privacy #surveillance #surveillanceCapitalism

  17. Oh lol, there it is.

    You should run yt-dlp on it, there's no way to tell if that video once again gets Bloomberg'd.

    ---

    216,000,000 Spy TVs | The LG Smart TV Problem
    youtu.be/6IFVTcM28KA

    #Surveillance #Dystopia #AIDystopia #SmartTV #Technocracy #LG

  18. "EU Age Verification Project Mandates Hardware-Bound Attestation"
    "Flock Pitched a Plan To Turn Uber and Lyft Drivers Into Roaming Surveillance Vehicles"
    "Illinois Just Told Every Operating System to Start Reporting Your Kid’s Age"
    "Meta’s $17 Billion Settlement is a Bad Deal for Teens and All Social Media Users"

    Check out the August news roundup for the full list of headlines.

    theprivacycloud.substack.com/p

    #privacy #security #surveillance #ageverification

  19. My god, #GamersNexus is a treasure of investigative tech journalism and quite frankly their attempts at improving anything they can gives hope.

    If you have a TV (especially #LG or #Vizio), even if it isn't connected… unplug it from power. It sounds like it isn't safe even in this state.

    Make sure to jump to 9m 57s if the link doesn't do it, that's where the main info is.

    ---

    We Could Get Sued for This (Teaser)
    youtu.be/w5KnFmKjFTA&t=9m57s

    #Technocracy #AIDystopia #Dystopia #Surveillance #SmartTV

  20. US military presence in Australia, mapped – video
    By Presented and produced by Bertin Huynh with Ben Doherty , additional production by Aine Hamilton and Rafqa Touma , executive producers are Molly Glassey and Michael Kalenderian

    Research by the Nautilus Institute has revealed what some analysts have labelled a 'colonisation' of Australia's military by the United States. With more than half of the military facilities in Australia having either US military or military corporate access, many are asking – could this drag Australia unwillingly into war?

    theguardian.com/global/video/2

    #Australianmilitary #Australianews #USmilitary #Espionage #Surveillance #Australianforeignpolicy #Weaponstechnology #TheGuardian #Presented #producedbyBertinHuynhwithBenDoherty #additionalproductionbyAineHamilton #RafqaTouma #executiveproducersareMollyGlassey #MichaelKalenderian

  21. The US now has access to more than half Australia’s military bases – could it drag the country unwillingly into war?
    By Ben Doherty, Andy Ball and Nick Evershed

    Exclusive: US-controlled weapons corporations and forces have control or access to more than 100 facilities across the continent, which some analysts describe as a ‘colonisation’ of Australia’s military. Find a map of them here

    theguardian.com/australia-news

    #Australianmilitary #Australianforeignpolicy #USmilitary #Australianpolitics #Australianews #USnews #RichardMarles #Weaponstechnology #Aukus #ChristopherPyne #China #AsiaPacific #Worldnews #DonaldTrump #Trumpadministration #MiddleEastandnorthAfrica #Espionage #Surveillance #TheGuardian #BenDoherty #AndyBall #NickEvershed

  22. Why are there so many US military bases in Australia, and could they drag us unwillingly into war? - podcast
    By Presented by Reged Ahmad with Ben Doherty; produced by Cheyne Anderson and Lu Hill; sound design and mixing by Jacob Round; the executive producer is Hannah Parkes

    Dotted like an outline around parts of Australia’s coast are military bases – the majority of which the US has control of or access to. Now a special Guardian investigation reveals the breadth of Donald Trump’s US military presence in the country, to a scale that the Australian public might not be aware of. Some analysts are warning it represents a ‘saturation’ or ‘colonisation’ of the Australian continent.

    theguardian.com/australia-news

    #Australianmilitary #Australianforeignpolicy #USmilitary #Weaponstechnology #Surveillance #Espionage #Australianews #TheGuardian #PresentedbyRegedAhmadwithBenDoherty #producedbyCheyneAnderson #LuHill #sounddesign #mixingbyJacobRound #theexecutiveproducerisHannahParkes

  23. Voilà la direction depuisenviron 2012, imposée aux diverses populations des États occidentaux malgré les contestations.

    youtu.be/M8it6uldNac

    #bigbrother #privacy #surveillance #dictature

  24. The group that I've been organizing with on police body cameras in Somerville just put out an update on where things sit, including the call-to-action with regard to Tuesday's hearing.
    docs.google.com/document/d/e/2

    #SomervilleMA #surveillance #policing #BodyCameras #MAPol

  25. "Using an advanced new instrument, scientists observed Einstein’s equivalence principle on a free-falling quantum"

    📢 Breakthrough Quantum Test Resolves a Major Cosmic Mystery
    404media.co/breakthrough-quant

    #Tech #Surveillance #Privacy