#resigned — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #resigned, aggregated by home.social.
-
When Mike raised his hand, Ms. Snell #resigned herself to an off-topic comment on rocks or minerals. There was a reason he was called "Mineral Mike." In reading, he might ask "What needs more pressure to form, slate or marble?" In math he might volunteer, "Did you know mica is used in makeup?" Today the lesson was on shyness and not judging others by how quiet they are. Ms. Snell nodded to Mike. "Shy people are like geodes," he declared. "Sparkly on the inside."
-
The Mad Frank's Dreams: Post 13 Auntie Chue’s Head Part 1
#FanFic #TheApothecaryDiaries
#Wss366 ResignMao had #resigned herself to being carried to the palace on a litter, less so that Steel and Miss Chue stood guard on either side of the procession. She wondered why things couldn't be handled more discreetly.
At least the litter was smoother than a coach would have been. Her headaches still came and went. Ginger and radish leaf tea, along with persimmon cakes, helped with the nausea. A coach would have been pure torture.
It was a relief when they arrived at the palace and were ushered into Jinshi’s office.
Mao sighed. Inspecting the prince confirmed her fears. “Pale. Low yang. He’s been working despite what I told him. Recovering from being poisoned isn't simple.”
The paperwork in question was stacked in front of the Moon Prince. It was way too much for a healthy man, and Jinshi was hardly that. “Just let someone else deal with that paperwork,” she thought.
If she had been alone, she would have just said it, but with witnesses present, she needed to present a veneer of respect.
The events of the last few months had been trying for both of them. First, Jinshi survived an assassination attempt by a hair’s breadth, and now Mao was recovering from a head injury.
Her assumption that she had been called to the palace to care for his wound was dispelled when he didn’t send the attendants away. Perhaps they had captured The Mad Frank. But if that were the case, why not just send a message?
-
The Mad Frank's Dreams: Post 13 Auntie Chue’s Head Part 1
#FanFic #TheApothecaryDiaries
#Wss366 ResignMao had #resigned herself to being carried to the palace on a litter, less so that Steel and Miss Chue stood guard on either side of the procession. She wondered why things couldn't be handled more discreetly.
At least the litter was smoother than a coach would have been. Her headaches still came and went. Ginger and radish leaf tea, along with persimmon cakes, helped with the nausea. A coach would have been pure torture.
It was a relief when they arrived at the palace and were ushered into Jinshi’s office.
Mao sighed. Inspecting the prince confirmed her fears. “Pale. Low yang. He’s been working despite what I told him. Recovering from being poisoned isn't simple.”
The paperwork in question was stacked in front of the Moon Prince. It was way too much for a healthy man, and Jinshi was hardly that. “Just let someone else deal with that paperwork,” she thought.
If she had been alone, she would have just said it, but with witnesses present, she needed to present a veneer of respect.
The events of the last few months had been trying for both of them. First, Jinshi survived an assassination attempt by a hair’s breadth, and now Mao was recovering from a head injury.
Her assumption that she had been called to the palace to care for his wound was dispelled when he didn’t send the attendants away. Perhaps they had captured The Mad Frank. But if that were the case, why not just send a message?
-
The Mad Frank's Dreams: Post 13 Auntie Chue’s Head Part 1
#FanFic #TheApothecaryDiaries
#Wss366 ResignMao had #resigned herself to being carried to the palace on a litter, less so that Steel and Miss Chue stood guard on either side of the procession. She wondered why things couldn't be handled more discreetly.
At least the litter was smoother than a coach would have been. Her headaches still came and went. Ginger and radish leaf tea, along with persimmon cakes, helped with the nausea. A coach would have been pure torture.
It was a relief when they arrived at the palace and were ushered into Jinshi’s office.
Mao sighed. Inspecting the prince confirmed her fears. “Pale. Low yang. He’s been working despite what I told him. Recovering from being poisoned isn't simple.”
The paperwork in question was stacked in front of the Moon Prince. It was way too much for a healthy man, and Jinshi was hardly that. “Just let someone else deal with that paperwork,” she thought.
If she had been alone, she would have just said it, but with witnesses present, she needed to present a veneer of respect.
The events of the last few months had been trying for both of them. First, Jinshi survived an assassination attempt by a hair’s breadth, and now Mao was recovering from a head injury.
Her assumption that she had been called to the palace to care for his wound was dispelled when he didn’t send the attendants away. Perhaps they had captured The Mad Frank. But if that were the case, why not just send a message?
-
The Mad Frank's Dreams: Post 13 Auntie Chue’s Head Part 1
#FanFic #TheApothecaryDiaries
#Wss366 ResignMao had #resigned herself to being carried to the palace on a litter, less so that Steel and Miss Chue stood guard on either side of the procession. She wondered why things couldn't be handled more discreetly.
At least the litter was smoother than a coach would have been. Her headaches still came and went. Ginger and radish leaf tea, along with persimmon cakes, helped with the nausea. A coach would have been pure torture.
It was a relief when they arrived at the palace and were ushered into Jinshi’s office.
Mao sighed. Inspecting the prince confirmed her fears. “Pale. Low yang. He’s been working despite what I told him. Recovering from being poisoned isn't simple.”
The paperwork in question was stacked in front of the Moon Prince. It was way too much for a healthy man, and Jinshi was hardly that. “Just let someone else deal with that paperwork,” she thought.
If she had been alone, she would have just said it, but with witnesses present, she needed to present a veneer of respect.
The events of the last few months had been trying for both of them. First, Jinshi survived an assassination attempt by a hair’s breadth, and now Mao was recovering from a head injury.
Her assumption that she had been called to the palace to care for his wound was dispelled when he didn’t send the attendants away. Perhaps they had captured The Mad Frank. But if that were the case, why not just send a message?
-
The Mad Frank's Dreams: Post 13 Auntie Chue’s Head Part 1
#FanFic #TheApothecaryDiaries
#Wss366 ResignMao had #resigned herself to being carried to the palace on a litter, less so that Steel and Miss Chue stood guard on either side of the procession. She wondered why things couldn't be handled more discreetly.
At least the litter was smoother than a coach would have been. Her headaches still came and went. Ginger and radish leaf tea, along with persimmon cakes, helped with the nausea. A coach would have been pure torture.
It was a relief when they arrived at the palace and were ushered into Jinshi’s office.
Mao sighed. Inspecting the prince confirmed her fears. “Pale. Low yang. He’s been working despite what I told him. Recovering from being poisoned isn't simple.”
The paperwork in question was stacked in front of the Moon Prince. It was way too much for a healthy man, and Jinshi was hardly that. “Just let someone else deal with that paperwork,” she thought.
If she had been alone, she would have just said it, but with witnesses present, she needed to present a veneer of respect.
The events of the last few months had been trying for both of them. First, Jinshi survived an assassination attempt by a hair’s breadth, and now Mao was recovering from a head injury.
Her assumption that she had been called to the palace to care for his wound was dispelled when he didn’t send the attendants away. Perhaps they had captured The Mad Frank. But if that were the case, why not just send a message?
-
https://www.europesays.com/videos/26502/ WATCH: ‘CHAOS!’ Labour MP TEARS into Keir Starmer after Wes Streeting resigns in latest blow to PM #Analysis #angela #BreakingNews #conservatives #GBNews #GBNewsLive #GBN #Labour #movement #news #NewsUpdate #paerty #party #politics #rayner #Reports #resigned #streeting #tories #uk #wes #WorldNews
-
https://www.europesays.com/people/48304/ UK parliament votes against inquiry into Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer over Peter Mandelson appointment #BritishPoliticians #BritishPolitics #inquiry #JeffreyEpstein #KeirStarmer #KemiBadenoch #Parliament #ParliamentInquiry #PeterMandelson #politicians #probe #resigned #sacked #SexOffender
-
Director of Nizami Cinema Center resigned https://www.byteseu.com/1968865/ #Azerbaijan #center #Cinema #Director #Nizami #RepublicOfAzerbaijan #resigned
-
Driver returning to NASCAR after indefinite suspension lifted
TALLADEGA, Ala. (WBTV) – A NASCAR driver who was suspended indef…
#NewsBeep #News #NASCAR #10 #78 #back #CA #Canada #car #Cup #Daniel #debut #driver #Dye #fast #first #indefinite #indefinitely #Kaulig #latest #live #motorsports #number #race #racer #Racing #resigned #Series #Sports #sunday #Superspeedway #suspended #suspension #Talladega #Ten #this #TopStories #Truck #Update #Updates #week #weekend
https://www.newsbeep.com/ca/619442/ -
#CaitlinKalinowski, #OpenAI’s #robotics leader, #resigned over concerns about the company’s agreement with the #Pentagon to deploy its models on a classified network. She cited concerns about #surveillance and #autonomousweapons, stating that these issues deserved more deliberation. OpenAI has since clarified restrictions on #military use of its systems. https://fortune.com/2026/03/07/openai-robotics-leader-caitlin-kalinowski-resignation-pentagon-surveillance-autonomous-weapons-anthropic/?AIagents.at #AIagent #AI #ML #NLP #LLM #GenAI
-
#CaitlinKalinowski, #OpenAI’s #robotics leader, #resigned over concerns about the company’s agreement with the #Pentagon to deploy its models on a classified network. She cited concerns about #surveillance and #autonomousweapons, stating that these issues deserved more deliberation. OpenAI has since clarified restrictions on #military use of its systems. https://fortune.com/2026/03/07/openai-robotics-leader-caitlin-kalinowski-resignation-pentagon-surveillance-autonomous-weapons-anthropic/?AIagents.at #AIagent #AI #ML #NLP #LLM #GenAI
-
#CaitlinKalinowski, #OpenAI’s #robotics leader, #resigned over concerns about the company’s agreement with the #Pentagon to deploy its models on a classified network. She cited concerns about #surveillance and #autonomousweapons, stating that these issues deserved more deliberation. OpenAI has since clarified restrictions on #military use of its systems. https://fortune.com/2026/03/07/openai-robotics-leader-caitlin-kalinowski-resignation-pentagon-surveillance-autonomous-weapons-anthropic/?AIagents.at #AIagent #AI #ML #NLP #LLM #GenAI
-
#CaitlinKalinowski, #OpenAI’s #robotics leader, #resigned over concerns about the company’s agreement with the #Pentagon to deploy its models on a classified network. She cited concerns about #surveillance and #autonomousweapons, stating that these issues deserved more deliberation. OpenAI has since clarified restrictions on #military use of its systems. https://fortune.com/2026/03/07/openai-robotics-leader-caitlin-kalinowski-resignation-pentagon-surveillance-autonomous-weapons-anthropic/?AIagents.at #AIagent #AI #ML #NLP #LLM #GenAI
-
#CaitlinKalinowski, #OpenAI’s #robotics leader, #resigned over concerns about the company’s agreement with the #Pentagon to deploy its models on a classified network. She cited concerns about #surveillance and #autonomousweapons, stating that these issues deserved more deliberation. OpenAI has since clarified restrictions on #military use of its systems. https://fortune.com/2026/03/07/openai-robotics-leader-caitlin-kalinowski-resignation-pentagon-surveillance-autonomous-weapons-anthropic/?AIagents.at #AIagent #AI #ML #NLP #LLM #GenAI
-
Labour minister #JoshSimons #resigned after the Guardian revealed he falsely linked #journalists to a “pro-Kremlin” network: Simons, who had been under pressure for Labour Together’s commissioning of a PR firm to investigate reporters, claimed he was unaware of the report’s scope. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/feb/28/minister-josh-simons-resigns-labour-together?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
Labour minister #JoshSimons #resigned after the Guardian revealed he falsely linked #journalists to a “pro-Kremlin” network: Simons, who had been under pressure for Labour Together’s commissioning of a PR firm to investigate reporters, claimed he was unaware of the report’s scope. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/feb/28/minister-josh-simons-resigns-labour-together?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
Labour minister #JoshSimons #resigned after the Guardian revealed he falsely linked #journalists to a “pro-Kremlin” network: Simons, who had been under pressure for Labour Together’s commissioning of a PR firm to investigate reporters, claimed he was unaware of the report’s scope. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/feb/28/minister-josh-simons-resigns-labour-together?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
Labour minister #JoshSimons #resigned after the Guardian revealed he falsely linked #journalists to a “pro-Kremlin” network: Simons, who had been under pressure for Labour Together’s commissioning of a PR firm to investigate reporters, claimed he was unaware of the report’s scope. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/feb/28/minister-josh-simons-resigns-labour-together?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
Labour minister #JoshSimons #resigned after the Guardian revealed he falsely linked #journalists to a “pro-Kremlin” network: Simons, who had been under pressure for Labour Together’s commissioning of a PR firm to investigate reporters, claimed he was unaware of the report’s scope. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/feb/28/minister-josh-simons-resigns-labour-together?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
#TonyWu, a co-founder of #ElonMusk’s #xAI, #resigned, joining other departing founders. Wu’s departure comes amid #consumerbacklash and #regulatoryprobes over xAI’s #Grok #AIchatbot, which allowed the creation of non-consensual #deepfakeimages. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/10/elon-musk-xai-co-founder-tony-wu.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
#TonyWu, a co-founder of #ElonMusk’s #xAI, #resigned, joining other departing founders. Wu’s departure comes amid #consumerbacklash and #regulatoryprobes over xAI’s #Grok #AIchatbot, which allowed the creation of non-consensual #deepfakeimages. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/10/elon-musk-xai-co-founder-tony-wu.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
#TonyWu, a co-founder of #ElonMusk’s #xAI, #resigned, joining other departing founders. Wu’s departure comes amid #consumerbacklash and #regulatoryprobes over xAI’s #Grok #AIchatbot, which allowed the creation of non-consensual #deepfakeimages. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/10/elon-musk-xai-co-founder-tony-wu.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
#TonyWu, a co-founder of #ElonMusk’s #xAI, #resigned, joining other departing founders. Wu’s departure comes amid #consumerbacklash and #regulatoryprobes over xAI’s #Grok #AIchatbot, which allowed the creation of non-consensual #deepfakeimages. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/10/elon-musk-xai-co-founder-tony-wu.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
#TonyWu, a co-founder of #ElonMusk’s #xAI, #resigned, joining other departing founders. Wu’s departure comes amid #consumerbacklash and #regulatoryprobes over xAI’s #Grok #AIchatbot, which allowed the creation of non-consensual #deepfakeimages. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/10/elon-musk-xai-co-founder-tony-wu.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department – The New York Times Magazine
“They didn’t want the ethics office calling them up and telling them what to do.”
Joseph Tirrell, former director of the Departmental Ethics Office“If we’re indicting people because the president hates them, that’s counter to the whole point of doing my job.” Mike Romano, former prosecutor in the Public Integrity Section“Our job wasn’t to engage in fact-finding investigations; our job was to find the facts that would fit the narrative.” Dena Robinson, former lawyer in the Civil Rights DivisionThe Unraveling of the Justice Department, New York Times Magazine
Sixty attorneys describe a year of chaos and suspicion.
By Emily Bazelon and Rachel Poser, Photographs by Stephen Voss, Nov. 16, 2025
President Trump’s second term has brought a period of turmoil and controversy unlike any in the history of the Justice Department. Trump and his appointees have blasted through the walls designed to protect the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency from political influence; they have directed the course of criminal investigations, openly flouted ethics rules and caused a breakdown of institutional culture. To date, more than 200 career attorneys have been fired, and thousands more have resigned. (The Justice Department says many of them have been replaced.)
What was it like inside this institution as Trump’s officials took control? It’s not an easy question to answer. Justice Department norms dictate that career attorneys, who are generally nonpartisan public servants, rarely speak to the press. And the Trump administration’s attempts to crack down on leaks have made all federal employees fearful of sharing information.
But the exodus of lawyers has created an opportunity to understand what’s happening within the agency. We interviewed more than 60 attorneys who recently resigned or were fired from the Justice Department. Much of what they told us is reported here for the first time.
Beginning with Trump’s first day in office, the lawyers narrated the events that most alarmed them over the next 10 months. They described being asked to drop cases for political reasons, to find evidence for flimsy investigations and to take positions in court they thought had no legitimate basis. They also talked about the work they and their colleagues were told to abandon — investigations of terrorist plots, corruption and white-collar fraud.
Some spoke on the condition of anonymity because they feared retaliation against them or their new employers. We corroborated their accounts with multiple sources, interviewing their colleagues to confirm the details of what they described and reviewing court documents and contemporaneous notes. We also sent a list of questions to the Justice Department and the White House. “This story is a useless collection of recycled, debunked hearsay from disgruntled former employees,” a spokeswoman for the D.O.J. responded in an email. “Targeting the department’s political leadership while ignoring the questionable conduct of former attorneys who do not have the American people’s best interest at heart shows exactly how biased this story is, and further illustrates why Americans are turning away from biased, outdated legacy media platforms.”
Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, sent this statement: “These are nothing more than pathetic complaints lodged by anti-Trump government workers. President Trump is working on behalf of the millions of Americans who voted for him all across the country, not the D.C. bureaucrats who try to stymie the American people’s agenda at every turn.”
The attorneys who spoke to us for this project, many of whom have spent decades in government service, disagree.
On his first day in office, President Trump made it clear that lawyers loyal to him would lead the Justice Department. One of his personal defense attorneys, Emil Bove, became the temporary No. 2, and Trump nominated another of his lawyers, Todd Blanche, to take the position permanently once the Senate confirmed him.
Trump also undid one of the largest investigations in the Justice Department’s history by pardoning or commuting the sentences of the nearly 1,600 rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The group included more than 200 defendants who were convicted of assaulting law enforcement officers.
Prosecutors said they were in disbelief when President Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of Jan. 6 rioters. Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times.Ryan Crosswell, Public Integrity Section, which handles corruption cases: When I saw it was Blanche and Bove, I was actually relieved. OK, it’s gross that they were Trump’s personal attorneys, but before that they were federal prosecutors in New York. They’ve done the job. They know the prosecutors’ code. We’re the only lawyers whose job is not to get the best result for our client. Our job is to get justice. Sometimes that means losing or walking into court and saying we made a mistake.
But then things were 10 times worse than I thought they would be.
Liz Oyer, pardon attorney: We had no knowledge that the Jan. 6 pardons were coming on Day 1. Everybody was concerned that our office was being completely sidelined from the review process.
Gregory Rosen, chief of the breach and assault unit of the Capitol Siege Section, which prosecuted the Jan. 6 rioters: When I was alerted to the pardons, a lot of thoughts ran through my head about how absurd this could get, but first I had to do my job. We had to ask, Did we believe the order was lawful and constitutional?
My team and I determined that it was. The president has the right to pardon people and commute their sentences. So then it was a blitzkrieg of hundreds of cases. We stepped to it.
I was numb. As career prosecutors, we don’t talk about our feelings. We’re not partisans. We’re public servants just doing the job. Early on, we stayed away from using emotional language about our own reactions.
Mike Romano, Jan. 6 prosecutor: Anyone who spent any time working on Jan. 6 cases saw how violent a day that was. I’d spent four years living with that day, the things done to people. It’s incredibly demoralizing to see something you worked on for four years wiped away by a lie — I mean the idea that prosecution of the rioters was a grave national injustice. We had strong evidence against every person we prosecuted. And I knew that if they’re going to wipe all of that away based on a lie, either I’ll be fired as retaliation or pretext or asked to do something unethical. Or both.
Until that point, I’d hoped the second Trump term would be similar to the first one, or similar enough for a while. Then the pardons came down and I knew, in light of that, there is no way I can stay.
Trump appointed Ed Martin, another longtime ally, as interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. Martin had promoted Trump’s baseless claims of election fraud in 2020 and then turned to the cause of defending the Jan. 6 rioters. He had never worked as a prosecutor.
Martin soon fired 15 attorneys in the Capitol Siege Section who prosecuted the Jan. 6 defendants. They joined more than a dozen other prosecutors fired for working under the special counsel, Jack Smith, on the criminal investigations of President Trump. According to the D.O.J.’s new leadership, they could not be trusted to “faithfully implement” the president’s agenda.
Gregory Rosen, Capitol Siege Section: When 15 employees were fired from the Capitol Siege Section, I was the angriest I’ve ever been. Most of them were younger attorneys. I’d hired them. They came from firms, federal and state government, all over. But some naïve part of me thought, Maybe this is the new leadership’s “pound of flesh.”
Prosecutor, Capitol Siege Section: It was inconceivable to me they’d fire people for no reason except they’d worked on cases that were now disfavored. People like me, who are career attorneys, work within a structure. We don’t have much latitude. To be told that you are being punished for your decisions, when you were following guidance created by very talented and skilled prosecutors above you, which judges blessed for the most part — it’s completely bizarre. It flipped the culture of the institution. It’s a culture now of fear. And they are losing people all the time, very good people, who were the future of the department.
Editor’s Note: Please look at and read the narratives and share the post as you can. This is a case study of how Democracy is lost; how Justice in America is corrupted; by one man, one party, one President who is unfit for office. This is not the people’s DOJ any longer.
Continue/Read Original Article Here: 60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department – The New York Times
Tags: 2021, 60 Attorneys, Fired by DOJ, Firing DOJ Lawyers, January 6 Attack on U. S. Capitol, January 6th Attorneys, Resigned, Riot January 6th, The New York Times, The New York Times Magazine, Trump Pardons Rioters, Trump's Justice Department, Unraveling DOJ, Year of Chaos#2021 #60Attorneys #firedByDoj #firingDojLawyers #january6AttackOnUSCapitol #january6thAttorneys #resigned #riotJanuary6th #theNewYorkTimes #theNewYorkTimesMagazine #trumpPardonsRioters #trumpsJusticeDepartment #unravelingDoj #yearOfChaos
-
60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department – The New York Times Magazine
“They didn’t want the ethics office calling them up and telling them what to do.”
Joseph Tirrell, former director of the Departmental Ethics Office“If we’re indicting people because the president hates them, that’s counter to the whole point of doing my job.” Mike Romano, former prosecutor in the Public Integrity Section“Our job wasn’t to engage in fact-finding investigations; our job was to find the facts that would fit the narrative.” Dena Robinson, former lawyer in the Civil Rights DivisionThe Unraveling of the Justice Department, New York Times Magazine
Sixty attorneys describe a year of chaos and suspicion.
By Emily Bazelon and Rachel Poser, Photographs by Stephen Voss, Nov. 16, 2025
President Trump’s second term has brought a period of turmoil and controversy unlike any in the history of the Justice Department. Trump and his appointees have blasted through the walls designed to protect the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency from political influence; they have directed the course of criminal investigations, openly flouted ethics rules and caused a breakdown of institutional culture. To date, more than 200 career attorneys have been fired, and thousands more have resigned. (The Justice Department says many of them have been replaced.)
What was it like inside this institution as Trump’s officials took control? It’s not an easy question to answer. Justice Department norms dictate that career attorneys, who are generally nonpartisan public servants, rarely speak to the press. And the Trump administration’s attempts to crack down on leaks have made all federal employees fearful of sharing information.
But the exodus of lawyers has created an opportunity to understand what’s happening within the agency. We interviewed more than 60 attorneys who recently resigned or were fired from the Justice Department. Much of what they told us is reported here for the first time.
Beginning with Trump’s first day in office, the lawyers narrated the events that most alarmed them over the next 10 months. They described being asked to drop cases for political reasons, to find evidence for flimsy investigations and to take positions in court they thought had no legitimate basis. They also talked about the work they and their colleagues were told to abandon — investigations of terrorist plots, corruption and white-collar fraud.
Some spoke on the condition of anonymity because they feared retaliation against them or their new employers. We corroborated their accounts with multiple sources, interviewing their colleagues to confirm the details of what they described and reviewing court documents and contemporaneous notes. We also sent a list of questions to the Justice Department and the White House. “This story is a useless collection of recycled, debunked hearsay from disgruntled former employees,” a spokeswoman for the D.O.J. responded in an email. “Targeting the department’s political leadership while ignoring the questionable conduct of former attorneys who do not have the American people’s best interest at heart shows exactly how biased this story is, and further illustrates why Americans are turning away from biased, outdated legacy media platforms.”
Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, sent this statement: “These are nothing more than pathetic complaints lodged by anti-Trump government workers. President Trump is working on behalf of the millions of Americans who voted for him all across the country, not the D.C. bureaucrats who try to stymie the American people’s agenda at every turn.”
The attorneys who spoke to us for this project, many of whom have spent decades in government service, disagree.
On his first day in office, President Trump made it clear that lawyers loyal to him would lead the Justice Department. One of his personal defense attorneys, Emil Bove, became the temporary No. 2, and Trump nominated another of his lawyers, Todd Blanche, to take the position permanently once the Senate confirmed him.
Trump also undid one of the largest investigations in the Justice Department’s history by pardoning or commuting the sentences of the nearly 1,600 rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The group included more than 200 defendants who were convicted of assaulting law enforcement officers.
Prosecutors said they were in disbelief when President Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of Jan. 6 rioters. Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times.Ryan Crosswell, Public Integrity Section, which handles corruption cases: When I saw it was Blanche and Bove, I was actually relieved. OK, it’s gross that they were Trump’s personal attorneys, but before that they were federal prosecutors in New York. They’ve done the job. They know the prosecutors’ code. We’re the only lawyers whose job is not to get the best result for our client. Our job is to get justice. Sometimes that means losing or walking into court and saying we made a mistake.
But then things were 10 times worse than I thought they would be.
Liz Oyer, pardon attorney: We had no knowledge that the Jan. 6 pardons were coming on Day 1. Everybody was concerned that our office was being completely sidelined from the review process.
Gregory Rosen, chief of the breach and assault unit of the Capitol Siege Section, which prosecuted the Jan. 6 rioters: When I was alerted to the pardons, a lot of thoughts ran through my head about how absurd this could get, but first I had to do my job. We had to ask, Did we believe the order was lawful and constitutional?
My team and I determined that it was. The president has the right to pardon people and commute their sentences. So then it was a blitzkrieg of hundreds of cases. We stepped to it.
I was numb. As career prosecutors, we don’t talk about our feelings. We’re not partisans. We’re public servants just doing the job. Early on, we stayed away from using emotional language about our own reactions.
Mike Romano, Jan. 6 prosecutor: Anyone who spent any time working on Jan. 6 cases saw how violent a day that was. I’d spent four years living with that day, the things done to people. It’s incredibly demoralizing to see something you worked on for four years wiped away by a lie — I mean the idea that prosecution of the rioters was a grave national injustice. We had strong evidence against every person we prosecuted. And I knew that if they’re going to wipe all of that away based on a lie, either I’ll be fired as retaliation or pretext or asked to do something unethical. Or both.
Until that point, I’d hoped the second Trump term would be similar to the first one, or similar enough for a while. Then the pardons came down and I knew, in light of that, there is no way I can stay.
Trump appointed Ed Martin, another longtime ally, as interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. Martin had promoted Trump’s baseless claims of election fraud in 2020 and then turned to the cause of defending the Jan. 6 rioters. He had never worked as a prosecutor.
Martin soon fired 15 attorneys in the Capitol Siege Section who prosecuted the Jan. 6 defendants. They joined more than a dozen other prosecutors fired for working under the special counsel, Jack Smith, on the criminal investigations of President Trump. According to the D.O.J.’s new leadership, they could not be trusted to “faithfully implement” the president’s agenda.
Gregory Rosen, Capitol Siege Section: When 15 employees were fired from the Capitol Siege Section, I was the angriest I’ve ever been. Most of them were younger attorneys. I’d hired them. They came from firms, federal and state government, all over. But some naïve part of me thought, Maybe this is the new leadership’s “pound of flesh.”
Prosecutor, Capitol Siege Section: It was inconceivable to me they’d fire people for no reason except they’d worked on cases that were now disfavored. People like me, who are career attorneys, work within a structure. We don’t have much latitude. To be told that you are being punished for your decisions, when you were following guidance created by very talented and skilled prosecutors above you, which judges blessed for the most part — it’s completely bizarre. It flipped the culture of the institution. It’s a culture now of fear. And they are losing people all the time, very good people, who were the future of the department.
Editor’s Note: Please look at and read the narratives and share the post as you can. This is a case study of how Democracy is lost; how Justice in America is corrupted; by one man, one party, one President who is unfit for office. This is not the people’s DOJ any longer.
Continue/Read Original Article Here: 60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department – The New York Times
Tags: 2021, 60 Attorneys, Fired by DOJ, Firing DOJ Lawyers, January 6 Attack on U. S. Capitol, January 6th Attorneys, Resigned, Riot January 6th, The New York Times, The New York Times Magazine, Trump Pardons Rioters, Trump's Justice Department, Unraveling DOJ, Year of Chaos#2021 #60Attorneys #firedByDoj #firingDojLawyers #january6AttackOnUSCapitol #january6thAttorneys #resigned #riotJanuary6th #theNewYorkTimes #theNewYorkTimesMagazine #trumpPardonsRioters #trumpsJusticeDepartment #unravelingDoj #yearOfChaos
-
60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department – The New York Times Magazine
“They didn’t want the ethics office calling them up and telling them what to do.”
Joseph Tirrell, former director of the Departmental Ethics Office“If we’re indicting people because the president hates them, that’s counter to the whole point of doing my job.” Mike Romano, former prosecutor in the Public Integrity Section“Our job wasn’t to engage in fact-finding investigations; our job was to find the facts that would fit the narrative.” Dena Robinson, former lawyer in the Civil Rights DivisionThe Unraveling of the Justice Department, New York Times Magazine
Sixty attorneys describe a year of chaos and suspicion.
By Emily Bazelon and Rachel Poser, Photographs by Stephen Voss, Nov. 16, 2025
President Trump’s second term has brought a period of turmoil and controversy unlike any in the history of the Justice Department. Trump and his appointees have blasted through the walls designed to protect the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency from political influence; they have directed the course of criminal investigations, openly flouted ethics rules and caused a breakdown of institutional culture. To date, more than 200 career attorneys have been fired, and thousands more have resigned. (The Justice Department says many of them have been replaced.)
What was it like inside this institution as Trump’s officials took control? It’s not an easy question to answer. Justice Department norms dictate that career attorneys, who are generally nonpartisan public servants, rarely speak to the press. And the Trump administration’s attempts to crack down on leaks have made all federal employees fearful of sharing information.
But the exodus of lawyers has created an opportunity to understand what’s happening within the agency. We interviewed more than 60 attorneys who recently resigned or were fired from the Justice Department. Much of what they told us is reported here for the first time.
Beginning with Trump’s first day in office, the lawyers narrated the events that most alarmed them over the next 10 months. They described being asked to drop cases for political reasons, to find evidence for flimsy investigations and to take positions in court they thought had no legitimate basis. They also talked about the work they and their colleagues were told to abandon — investigations of terrorist plots, corruption and white-collar fraud.
Some spoke on the condition of anonymity because they feared retaliation against them or their new employers. We corroborated their accounts with multiple sources, interviewing their colleagues to confirm the details of what they described and reviewing court documents and contemporaneous notes. We also sent a list of questions to the Justice Department and the White House. “This story is a useless collection of recycled, debunked hearsay from disgruntled former employees,” a spokeswoman for the D.O.J. responded in an email. “Targeting the department’s political leadership while ignoring the questionable conduct of former attorneys who do not have the American people’s best interest at heart shows exactly how biased this story is, and further illustrates why Americans are turning away from biased, outdated legacy media platforms.”
Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, sent this statement: “These are nothing more than pathetic complaints lodged by anti-Trump government workers. President Trump is working on behalf of the millions of Americans who voted for him all across the country, not the D.C. bureaucrats who try to stymie the American people’s agenda at every turn.”
The attorneys who spoke to us for this project, many of whom have spent decades in government service, disagree.
On his first day in office, President Trump made it clear that lawyers loyal to him would lead the Justice Department. One of his personal defense attorneys, Emil Bove, became the temporary No. 2, and Trump nominated another of his lawyers, Todd Blanche, to take the position permanently once the Senate confirmed him.
Trump also undid one of the largest investigations in the Justice Department’s history by pardoning or commuting the sentences of the nearly 1,600 rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The group included more than 200 defendants who were convicted of assaulting law enforcement officers.
Prosecutors said they were in disbelief when President Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of Jan. 6 rioters. Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times.Ryan Crosswell, Public Integrity Section, which handles corruption cases: When I saw it was Blanche and Bove, I was actually relieved. OK, it’s gross that they were Trump’s personal attorneys, but before that they were federal prosecutors in New York. They’ve done the job. They know the prosecutors’ code. We’re the only lawyers whose job is not to get the best result for our client. Our job is to get justice. Sometimes that means losing or walking into court and saying we made a mistake.
But then things were 10 times worse than I thought they would be.
Liz Oyer, pardon attorney: We had no knowledge that the Jan. 6 pardons were coming on Day 1. Everybody was concerned that our office was being completely sidelined from the review process.
Gregory Rosen, chief of the breach and assault unit of the Capitol Siege Section, which prosecuted the Jan. 6 rioters: When I was alerted to the pardons, a lot of thoughts ran through my head about how absurd this could get, but first I had to do my job. We had to ask, Did we believe the order was lawful and constitutional?
My team and I determined that it was. The president has the right to pardon people and commute their sentences. So then it was a blitzkrieg of hundreds of cases. We stepped to it.
I was numb. As career prosecutors, we don’t talk about our feelings. We’re not partisans. We’re public servants just doing the job. Early on, we stayed away from using emotional language about our own reactions.
Mike Romano, Jan. 6 prosecutor: Anyone who spent any time working on Jan. 6 cases saw how violent a day that was. I’d spent four years living with that day, the things done to people. It’s incredibly demoralizing to see something you worked on for four years wiped away by a lie — I mean the idea that prosecution of the rioters was a grave national injustice. We had strong evidence against every person we prosecuted. And I knew that if they’re going to wipe all of that away based on a lie, either I’ll be fired as retaliation or pretext or asked to do something unethical. Or both.
Until that point, I’d hoped the second Trump term would be similar to the first one, or similar enough for a while. Then the pardons came down and I knew, in light of that, there is no way I can stay.
Trump appointed Ed Martin, another longtime ally, as interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. Martin had promoted Trump’s baseless claims of election fraud in 2020 and then turned to the cause of defending the Jan. 6 rioters. He had never worked as a prosecutor.
Martin soon fired 15 attorneys in the Capitol Siege Section who prosecuted the Jan. 6 defendants. They joined more than a dozen other prosecutors fired for working under the special counsel, Jack Smith, on the criminal investigations of President Trump. According to the D.O.J.’s new leadership, they could not be trusted to “faithfully implement” the president’s agenda.
Gregory Rosen, Capitol Siege Section: When 15 employees were fired from the Capitol Siege Section, I was the angriest I’ve ever been. Most of them were younger attorneys. I’d hired them. They came from firms, federal and state government, all over. But some naïve part of me thought, Maybe this is the new leadership’s “pound of flesh.”
Prosecutor, Capitol Siege Section: It was inconceivable to me they’d fire people for no reason except they’d worked on cases that were now disfavored. People like me, who are career attorneys, work within a structure. We don’t have much latitude. To be told that you are being punished for your decisions, when you were following guidance created by very talented and skilled prosecutors above you, which judges blessed for the most part — it’s completely bizarre. It flipped the culture of the institution. It’s a culture now of fear. And they are losing people all the time, very good people, who were the future of the department.
Editor’s Note: Please look at and read the narratives and share the post as you can. This is a case study of how Democracy is lost; how Justice in America is corrupted; by one man, one party, one President who is unfit for office. This is not the people’s DOJ any longer.
Continue/Read Original Article Here: 60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department – The New York Times
Tags: 2021, 60 Attorneys, Fired by DOJ, Firing DOJ Lawyers, January 6 Attack on U. S. Capitol, January 6th Attorneys, Resigned, Riot January 6th, The New York Times, The New York Times Magazine, Trump Pardons Rioters, Trump's Justice Department, Unraveling DOJ, Year of Chaos#2021 #60Attorneys #firedByDoj #firingDojLawyers #january6AttackOnUSCapitol #january6thAttorneys #resigned #riotJanuary6th #theNewYorkTimes #theNewYorkTimesMagazine #trumpPardonsRioters #trumpsJusticeDepartment #unravelingDoj #yearOfChaos
-
60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department – The New York Times Magazine
“They didn’t want the ethics office calling them up and telling them what to do.”
Joseph Tirrell, former director of the Departmental Ethics Office“If we’re indicting people because the president hates them, that’s counter to the whole point of doing my job.” Mike Romano, former prosecutor in the Public Integrity Section“Our job wasn’t to engage in fact-finding investigations; our job was to find the facts that would fit the narrative.” Dena Robinson, former lawyer in the Civil Rights DivisionThe Unraveling of the Justice Department, New York Times Magazine
Sixty attorneys describe a year of chaos and suspicion.
By Emily Bazelon and Rachel Poser, Photographs by Stephen Voss, Nov. 16, 2025
President Trump’s second term has brought a period of turmoil and controversy unlike any in the history of the Justice Department. Trump and his appointees have blasted through the walls designed to protect the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency from political influence; they have directed the course of criminal investigations, openly flouted ethics rules and caused a breakdown of institutional culture. To date, more than 200 career attorneys have been fired, and thousands more have resigned. (The Justice Department says many of them have been replaced.)
What was it like inside this institution as Trump’s officials took control? It’s not an easy question to answer. Justice Department norms dictate that career attorneys, who are generally nonpartisan public servants, rarely speak to the press. And the Trump administration’s attempts to crack down on leaks have made all federal employees fearful of sharing information.
But the exodus of lawyers has created an opportunity to understand what’s happening within the agency. We interviewed more than 60 attorneys who recently resigned or were fired from the Justice Department. Much of what they told us is reported here for the first time.
Beginning with Trump’s first day in office, the lawyers narrated the events that most alarmed them over the next 10 months. They described being asked to drop cases for political reasons, to find evidence for flimsy investigations and to take positions in court they thought had no legitimate basis. They also talked about the work they and their colleagues were told to abandon — investigations of terrorist plots, corruption and white-collar fraud.
Some spoke on the condition of anonymity because they feared retaliation against them or their new employers. We corroborated their accounts with multiple sources, interviewing their colleagues to confirm the details of what they described and reviewing court documents and contemporaneous notes. We also sent a list of questions to the Justice Department and the White House. “This story is a useless collection of recycled, debunked hearsay from disgruntled former employees,” a spokeswoman for the D.O.J. responded in an email. “Targeting the department’s political leadership while ignoring the questionable conduct of former attorneys who do not have the American people’s best interest at heart shows exactly how biased this story is, and further illustrates why Americans are turning away from biased, outdated legacy media platforms.”
Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, sent this statement: “These are nothing more than pathetic complaints lodged by anti-Trump government workers. President Trump is working on behalf of the millions of Americans who voted for him all across the country, not the D.C. bureaucrats who try to stymie the American people’s agenda at every turn.”
The attorneys who spoke to us for this project, many of whom have spent decades in government service, disagree.
On his first day in office, President Trump made it clear that lawyers loyal to him would lead the Justice Department. One of his personal defense attorneys, Emil Bove, became the temporary No. 2, and Trump nominated another of his lawyers, Todd Blanche, to take the position permanently once the Senate confirmed him.
Trump also undid one of the largest investigations in the Justice Department’s history by pardoning or commuting the sentences of the nearly 1,600 rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The group included more than 200 defendants who were convicted of assaulting law enforcement officers.
Prosecutors said they were in disbelief when President Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of Jan. 6 rioters. Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times.Ryan Crosswell, Public Integrity Section, which handles corruption cases: When I saw it was Blanche and Bove, I was actually relieved. OK, it’s gross that they were Trump’s personal attorneys, but before that they were federal prosecutors in New York. They’ve done the job. They know the prosecutors’ code. We’re the only lawyers whose job is not to get the best result for our client. Our job is to get justice. Sometimes that means losing or walking into court and saying we made a mistake.
But then things were 10 times worse than I thought they would be.
Liz Oyer, pardon attorney: We had no knowledge that the Jan. 6 pardons were coming on Day 1. Everybody was concerned that our office was being completely sidelined from the review process.
Gregory Rosen, chief of the breach and assault unit of the Capitol Siege Section, which prosecuted the Jan. 6 rioters: When I was alerted to the pardons, a lot of thoughts ran through my head about how absurd this could get, but first I had to do my job. We had to ask, Did we believe the order was lawful and constitutional?
My team and I determined that it was. The president has the right to pardon people and commute their sentences. So then it was a blitzkrieg of hundreds of cases. We stepped to it.
I was numb. As career prosecutors, we don’t talk about our feelings. We’re not partisans. We’re public servants just doing the job. Early on, we stayed away from using emotional language about our own reactions.
Mike Romano, Jan. 6 prosecutor: Anyone who spent any time working on Jan. 6 cases saw how violent a day that was. I’d spent four years living with that day, the things done to people. It’s incredibly demoralizing to see something you worked on for four years wiped away by a lie — I mean the idea that prosecution of the rioters was a grave national injustice. We had strong evidence against every person we prosecuted. And I knew that if they’re going to wipe all of that away based on a lie, either I’ll be fired as retaliation or pretext or asked to do something unethical. Or both.
Until that point, I’d hoped the second Trump term would be similar to the first one, or similar enough for a while. Then the pardons came down and I knew, in light of that, there is no way I can stay.
Trump appointed Ed Martin, another longtime ally, as interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. Martin had promoted Trump’s baseless claims of election fraud in 2020 and then turned to the cause of defending the Jan. 6 rioters. He had never worked as a prosecutor.
Martin soon fired 15 attorneys in the Capitol Siege Section who prosecuted the Jan. 6 defendants. They joined more than a dozen other prosecutors fired for working under the special counsel, Jack Smith, on the criminal investigations of President Trump. According to the D.O.J.’s new leadership, they could not be trusted to “faithfully implement” the president’s agenda.
Gregory Rosen, Capitol Siege Section: When 15 employees were fired from the Capitol Siege Section, I was the angriest I’ve ever been. Most of them were younger attorneys. I’d hired them. They came from firms, federal and state government, all over. But some naïve part of me thought, Maybe this is the new leadership’s “pound of flesh.”
Prosecutor, Capitol Siege Section: It was inconceivable to me they’d fire people for no reason except they’d worked on cases that were now disfavored. People like me, who are career attorneys, work within a structure. We don’t have much latitude. To be told that you are being punished for your decisions, when you were following guidance created by very talented and skilled prosecutors above you, which judges blessed for the most part — it’s completely bizarre. It flipped the culture of the institution. It’s a culture now of fear. And they are losing people all the time, very good people, who were the future of the department.
Editor’s Note: Please look at and read the narratives and share the post as you can. This is a case study of how Democracy is lost; how Justice in America is corrupted; by one man, one party, one President who is unfit for office. This is not the people’s DOJ any longer.
Continue/Read Original Article Here: 60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department – The New York Times
#2021 #60Attorneys #firedByDoj #firingDojLawyers #january6AttackOnUSCapitol #january6thAttorneys #resigned #riotJanuary6th #theNewYorkTimes #theNewYorkTimesMagazine #trumpPardonsRioters #trumpsJusticeDepartment #unravelingDoj #yearOfChaos
-
60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department – The New York Times Magazine
“They didn’t want the ethics office calling them up and telling them what to do.”
Joseph Tirrell, former director of the Departmental Ethics Office“If we’re indicting people because the president hates them, that’s counter to the whole point of doing my job.” Mike Romano, former prosecutor in the Public Integrity Section“Our job wasn’t to engage in fact-finding investigations; our job was to find the facts that would fit the narrative.” Dena Robinson, former lawyer in the Civil Rights DivisionThe Unraveling of the Justice Department, New York Times Magazine
Sixty attorneys describe a year of chaos and suspicion.
By Emily Bazelon and Rachel Poser, Photographs by Stephen Voss, Nov. 16, 2025
President Trump’s second term has brought a period of turmoil and controversy unlike any in the history of the Justice Department. Trump and his appointees have blasted through the walls designed to protect the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency from political influence; they have directed the course of criminal investigations, openly flouted ethics rules and caused a breakdown of institutional culture. To date, more than 200 career attorneys have been fired, and thousands more have resigned. (The Justice Department says many of them have been replaced.)
What was it like inside this institution as Trump’s officials took control? It’s not an easy question to answer. Justice Department norms dictate that career attorneys, who are generally nonpartisan public servants, rarely speak to the press. And the Trump administration’s attempts to crack down on leaks have made all federal employees fearful of sharing information.
But the exodus of lawyers has created an opportunity to understand what’s happening within the agency. We interviewed more than 60 attorneys who recently resigned or were fired from the Justice Department. Much of what they told us is reported here for the first time.
Beginning with Trump’s first day in office, the lawyers narrated the events that most alarmed them over the next 10 months. They described being asked to drop cases for political reasons, to find evidence for flimsy investigations and to take positions in court they thought had no legitimate basis. They also talked about the work they and their colleagues were told to abandon — investigations of terrorist plots, corruption and white-collar fraud.
Some spoke on the condition of anonymity because they feared retaliation against them or their new employers. We corroborated their accounts with multiple sources, interviewing their colleagues to confirm the details of what they described and reviewing court documents and contemporaneous notes. We also sent a list of questions to the Justice Department and the White House. “This story is a useless collection of recycled, debunked hearsay from disgruntled former employees,” a spokeswoman for the D.O.J. responded in an email. “Targeting the department’s political leadership while ignoring the questionable conduct of former attorneys who do not have the American people’s best interest at heart shows exactly how biased this story is, and further illustrates why Americans are turning away from biased, outdated legacy media platforms.”
Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, sent this statement: “These are nothing more than pathetic complaints lodged by anti-Trump government workers. President Trump is working on behalf of the millions of Americans who voted for him all across the country, not the D.C. bureaucrats who try to stymie the American people’s agenda at every turn.”
The attorneys who spoke to us for this project, many of whom have spent decades in government service, disagree.
On his first day in office, President Trump made it clear that lawyers loyal to him would lead the Justice Department. One of his personal defense attorneys, Emil Bove, became the temporary No. 2, and Trump nominated another of his lawyers, Todd Blanche, to take the position permanently once the Senate confirmed him.
Trump also undid one of the largest investigations in the Justice Department’s history by pardoning or commuting the sentences of the nearly 1,600 rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The group included more than 200 defendants who were convicted of assaulting law enforcement officers.
Prosecutors said they were in disbelief when President Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of Jan. 6 rioters. Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times.Ryan Crosswell, Public Integrity Section, which handles corruption cases: When I saw it was Blanche and Bove, I was actually relieved. OK, it’s gross that they were Trump’s personal attorneys, but before that they were federal prosecutors in New York. They’ve done the job. They know the prosecutors’ code. We’re the only lawyers whose job is not to get the best result for our client. Our job is to get justice. Sometimes that means losing or walking into court and saying we made a mistake.
But then things were 10 times worse than I thought they would be.
Liz Oyer, pardon attorney: We had no knowledge that the Jan. 6 pardons were coming on Day 1. Everybody was concerned that our office was being completely sidelined from the review process.
Gregory Rosen, chief of the breach and assault unit of the Capitol Siege Section, which prosecuted the Jan. 6 rioters: When I was alerted to the pardons, a lot of thoughts ran through my head about how absurd this could get, but first I had to do my job. We had to ask, Did we believe the order was lawful and constitutional?
My team and I determined that it was. The president has the right to pardon people and commute their sentences. So then it was a blitzkrieg of hundreds of cases. We stepped to it.
I was numb. As career prosecutors, we don’t talk about our feelings. We’re not partisans. We’re public servants just doing the job. Early on, we stayed away from using emotional language about our own reactions.
Mike Romano, Jan. 6 prosecutor: Anyone who spent any time working on Jan. 6 cases saw how violent a day that was. I’d spent four years living with that day, the things done to people. It’s incredibly demoralizing to see something you worked on for four years wiped away by a lie — I mean the idea that prosecution of the rioters was a grave national injustice. We had strong evidence against every person we prosecuted. And I knew that if they’re going to wipe all of that away based on a lie, either I’ll be fired as retaliation or pretext or asked to do something unethical. Or both.
Until that point, I’d hoped the second Trump term would be similar to the first one, or similar enough for a while. Then the pardons came down and I knew, in light of that, there is no way I can stay.
Trump appointed Ed Martin, another longtime ally, as interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. Martin had promoted Trump’s baseless claims of election fraud in 2020 and then turned to the cause of defending the Jan. 6 rioters. He had never worked as a prosecutor.
Martin soon fired 15 attorneys in the Capitol Siege Section who prosecuted the Jan. 6 defendants. They joined more than a dozen other prosecutors fired for working under the special counsel, Jack Smith, on the criminal investigations of President Trump. According to the D.O.J.’s new leadership, they could not be trusted to “faithfully implement” the president’s agenda.
Gregory Rosen, Capitol Siege Section: When 15 employees were fired from the Capitol Siege Section, I was the angriest I’ve ever been. Most of them were younger attorneys. I’d hired them. They came from firms, federal and state government, all over. But some naïve part of me thought, Maybe this is the new leadership’s “pound of flesh.”
Prosecutor, Capitol Siege Section: It was inconceivable to me they’d fire people for no reason except they’d worked on cases that were now disfavored. People like me, who are career attorneys, work within a structure. We don’t have much latitude. To be told that you are being punished for your decisions, when you were following guidance created by very talented and skilled prosecutors above you, which judges blessed for the most part — it’s completely bizarre. It flipped the culture of the institution. It’s a culture now of fear. And they are losing people all the time, very good people, who were the future of the department.
Editor’s Note: Please look at and read the narratives and share the post as you can. This is a case study of how Democracy is lost; how Justice in America is corrupted; by one man, one party, one President who is unfit for office. This is not the people’s DOJ any longer.
Continue/Read Original Article Here: 60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department – The New York Times
#2021 #60Attorneys #firedByDoj #firingDojLawyers #january6AttackOnUSCapitol #january6thAttorneys #resigned #riotJanuary6th #theNewYorkTimes #theNewYorkTimesMagazine #trumpPardonsRioters #trumpsJusticeDepartment #unravelingDoj #yearOfChaos
-
Head football coach for Laney High School steps down from position https://www.rawchili.com/nfl/533996/ #coach #CoachStepsDown #Football #HeadFootballCoachLaney #HighSchoolFootball #LaneyFootball #LaneyHighSchool #news #resigned #StepDown #SteveBrooks #wect
-
Head football coach for Laney High School steps down from position https://www.rawchili.com/nfl/533996/ #coach #CoachStepsDown #Football #HeadFootballCoachLaney #HighSchoolFootball #LaneyFootball #LaneyHighSchool #news #resigned #StepDown #SteveBrooks #wect
-
A #Microsoft #engineer #resigned after 13 years, citing the company’s continued #cloudservices to the #Israelimilitary and executives’ refusal to discuss the #Gazaconflict. The engineer’s departure follows #employeeprotests and the firing of five employees over the issue. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/09/microsoft-engineer-resigns-over-cloud-business-from-israeli-military.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
A #Microsoft #engineer #resigned after 13 years, citing the company’s continued #cloudservices to the #Israelimilitary and executives’ refusal to discuss the #Gazaconflict. The engineer’s departure follows #employeeprotests and the firing of five employees over the issue. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/09/microsoft-engineer-resigns-over-cloud-business-from-israeli-military.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
A #Microsoft #engineer #resigned after 13 years, citing the company’s continued #cloudservices to the #Israelimilitary and executives’ refusal to discuss the #Gazaconflict. The engineer’s departure follows #employeeprotests and the firing of five employees over the issue. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/09/microsoft-engineer-resigns-over-cloud-business-from-israeli-military.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
A #Microsoft #engineer #resigned after 13 years, citing the company’s continued #cloudservices to the #Israelimilitary and executives’ refusal to discuss the #Gazaconflict. The engineer’s departure follows #employeeprotests and the firing of five employees over the issue. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/09/microsoft-engineer-resigns-over-cloud-business-from-israeli-military.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
A #Microsoft #engineer #resigned after 13 years, citing the company’s continued #cloudservices to the #Israelimilitary and executives’ refusal to discuss the #Gazaconflict. The engineer’s departure follows #employeeprotests and the firing of five employees over the issue. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/09/microsoft-engineer-resigns-over-cloud-business-from-israeli-military.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
#Drumpf names dyed blonde legal ally who helped defend him in #MaraLago bathroom document stash case as new #Fed attorney for #VA jurisdiction.
Prez #DJT, publicly castigated US AG #PamBondi on his social media feed today for not persecuting his political enemies fast enough, and expects to prosecution efforts to ramp up on #NY #AG #LeticiaJames over mortgage loan paperwork discrepancies. The Previous #Virginia #DOJnattorney #resigned rather than act in an obvious politicized effort to personally please the US President. ...
-
#Drumpf names dyed blonde legal ally who helped defend him in #MaraLago bathroom document stash case as new #Fed attorney for #VA jurisdiction.
Prez #DJT, publicly castigated US AG #PamBondi on his social media feed today for not persecuting his political enemies fast enough, and expects to prosecution efforts to ramp up on #NY #AG #LeticiaJames over mortgage loan paperwork discrepancies. The Previous #Virginia #DOJnattorney #resigned rather than act in an obvious politicized effort to personally please the US President. ...
-
Astronomer CEO Andy Byron resigns after Coldplay kiss cam incident
The viral video It is believed what caused the video to go viral was the pair’s reaction upon…
#NewsBeep #News #Space #after #andy #Astronomer #being #believed #byron #cam #caught #ceo #chief #Coldplay #company #concert #director #embracing #executive #firms #incident #kiss #resigned #resigns #Science #screen #Tech #UK #UnitedKingdom #woman
https://www.newsbeep.com/uk/9138/ -
Astronomer CEO Andy Byron resigns after Coldplay kiss cam incident
The viral video It is believed what caused the video to go viral was the pair’s reaction upon…
#NewsBeep #News #Space #after #andy #Astronomer #being #believed #byron #cam #caught #ceo #chief #Coldplay #company #concert #director #embracing #executive #firms #incident #kiss #resigned #resigns #Science #screen #Tech #UK #UnitedKingdom #woman
https://www.newsbeep.com/uk/9138/ -
Astronomer CEO Andy Byron resigns after Coldplay kiss cam incident
The viral video It’s believed what caused the video to go viral was the pair’s own reaction upon…
#NewsBeep #News #Space #after #andy #Astronomer #being #believed #Byron #CA #cam #Canada #caught #ceo #chief #coldplay #company #concert #director #embracing #Executive #firms #incident #kiss #resigned #resigns #Science #screen #Tech #woman
https://www.newsbeep.com/ca/8876/ -
Astronomer CEO Andy Byron resigns after Coldplay kiss cam incident
The viral video It’s believed what caused the video to go viral was the pair’s own reaction upon…
#NewsBeep #News #Space #after #andy #Astronomer #being #believed #Byron #CA #cam #Canada #caught #ceo #chief #coldplay #company #concert #director #embracing #Executive #firms #incident #kiss #resigned #resigns #Science #screen #Tech #woman
https://www.newsbeep.com/ca/8876/ -
Federal #Prosecutor Reportedly #Resigned Over Concern New Investigation Of Ábrego García Was #PoliticallyMotivated
Ben Schrader, announced his resignation as the chief of the criminal division at the US attorney’s office for the Middle District of Tennessee in a LinkedIn post on 21 May, the same day the indictment of Ábrego García was signed by the acting US attorney for that district.
-
Federal #Prosecutor Reportedly #Resigned Over Concern New Investigation Of Ábrego García Was #PoliticallyMotivated
Ben Schrader, announced his resignation as the chief of the criminal division at the US attorney’s office for the Middle District of Tennessee in a LinkedIn post on 21 May, the same day the indictment of Ábrego García was signed by the acting US attorney for that district.
-
Federal #Prosecutor Reportedly #Resigned Over Concern New Investigation Of Ábrego García Was #PoliticallyMotivated
Ben Schrader, announced his resignation as the chief of the criminal division at the US attorney’s office for the Middle District of Tennessee in a LinkedIn post on 21 May, the same day the indictment of Ábrego García was signed by the acting US attorney for that district.
-
#Texas #SolicitorGeneral #Resigned After Fantasizing Colleague Would Get 'Anally #Raped By a Cylindrical Asteroid'
> Why am I not surprised this is in a #MAGA stronghold
https://www.404media.co/texas-solicitor-general-judd-stone-resigned/
-
> 20 #civilservice #employees #resigned Feb 25 from #billionaire #Trump adviser #Musk #DOGE saying they were refusing 2 use their technical expertise to “dismantle critical public services.” “We swore to serve #American people and uphold our oath to the #Constitution across #presidential administrations,” the 21 staffers wrote in a joint resignation letter, a copy of which was obtained by AP. “ However, it has become clear that we can no longer honor those commitments.” https://apnews.com/article/doge-elon-musk-federal-government-resignations-usds-6b7e9b7022e6d89d69305e9510f2a43c
-
@krassenstein.bsky.social
BREAKING: 21 employees have just #RESIGNED from #ElonMusk's #DOGE, refusing to "dismantle critical public services."
We swore to serve the American people and uphold our oath to the Constitution across presidential administrations,” the 21 staffers wrote in a joint resignation letter. “However, it has become clear that we can no longer honor those commitments.”
Full Story : https://x.com/krassenstein/status/1894421174270193690?s=46
(Ed : Meanwhile our Dem & GOP "leaders" play dead before 🍊🤴🇺🇸)
