home.social

#nonlinear — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #nonlinear, aggregated by home.social.

  1. "I think it's shocking every time how bad things can be on their way to being good. It blows my mind. It's like when someone's solving a Rubik's Cube, and it looks like they're so far from solving it right before they solve it. When you're in the middle of something—you listen to it, and you're like, 'tomorrow, this might get amazing, but today, it's so bad.' The exciting thing is that it's every time."

    #design #nonlinear #classic

    podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/

  2. « Let's go ! #OpenShot 3.4 is here, and it's one of our largest updates we've ever done. An overall 32% speed up in performance, lower memory utilization, many new video effects and features, many bugs and crashes fixed, and an experimental timeline for those brave enough to test the future of OpenShot ! »

    youtu.be/XU3pF3UVWPo
    openshot.org/blog/2025/12/15/n [ ChangeLog ]

    #Video #NonLinear #VideoEditor #OpenSource

  3. @SnowyCA

    While we're urging things..

    I urge it to not close up shop at the end if things have not resolved. Staying is expensive, and I'll come back to that, but it also says "it matters to resolve this". You can't just walk away from things that matter.

    By contrast, postponing to another year's meeting sends a very strong signal (possibly the ONLY signal anyone up the management chain hears) that this is a routine, linear, manageable problem, not an emergency, exponential, must-fix one. So phone in to your office and say you're there until you have resolution.

    If you really MUST break, break for less than a year. Maybe you literally don't have funding to stay. Well, get agreement among participants that the next meeting is sooner than a year. Management can't argue against that because that's a group consensus.

    Even if you get in trouble for being part of that consensus, (1) you were only a very small part and (2) fixing Climate is going to involve some risks. As risks go, that's a pretty modest one to take. Do your part. Push the line. The world is counting on you.

    Probably these things are on budgeted funding cycles, so fighting the notion that this can be scheduled, by pushing the next meeting into the same cycle might get some visibility about the fact that the problem is getting worse.

    I'll make a loose analogy, because that's my style and how I think. At a restaurant, if things go wrong in a small way, a manager might give you a free appetizer or dessert. This might feel satisfying, but is probably budgeted. If the problem is bad enough, ask for your whole meal comped. It's a proper response, but it has an important difference. Probably someone will have to answer for it. A higher manager will say "hey, that's unusual. What's that about?" The free appetizer or free dessert isn't just budgeted, but it also doesn't get visibility up the chain so nothing gets fixed. The system knows it is flawed, so it keeps on being flawed and solves the problem by budgets, not by action.

    The Climate problem is TOO BUDGETED. But it is a real, not-going-away problem that is worth spending every resource on earth to fix, because every resource on earth is in dire peril just now. Do not behave like this is something that has to fit in a neat box. It does not. The people saying it does are content to see mass death or even extinction. Do not let them have the final word.

    People right now seem to meet because it's that time of year. Like it's almost a vacation. Something fun to look forward to all year. To me, that sends the signal that there is no problem. Not in words, but in deeds. Is that the signal you want to send?

    One way to make there be a real visibility is to change something that forces the whole management structure (countries, probably, but maybe some big corporations) to have to see it differently.

    It also gives the media something to write about rather than just phoning in the previous year's articles with the dates changed.

    As I said, just an idea. Well, two of them really. Stay longer, meet more often. But if it's an emergency (and it is), it warrants emergency action, not just routine action.

    And it's a problem that's accelerating, but the meeting frequency is not. Is the danger of that dissonance not apparent to everyone? Why not?

    #Climate #ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency #collapse #extinction #conference #COP #COP30 #meetings #media #journalism #ClimateNews #psychology #acceleration #nonlinear #politics #ClimateAction #ClimateInaction

  4. @SnowyCA

    While we're urging things..

    I urge it to not close up shop at the end if things have not resolved. Staying is expensive, and I'll come back to that, but it also says "it matters to resolve this". You can't just walk away from things that matter.

    By contrast, postponing to another year's meeting sends a very strong signal (possibly the ONLY signal anyone up the management chain hears) that this is a routine, linear, manageable problem, not an emergency, exponential, must-fix one. So phone in to your office and say you're there until you have resolution.

    If you really MUST break, break for less than a year. Maybe you literally don't have funding to stay. Well, get agreement among participants that the next meeting is sooner than a year. Management can't argue against that because that's a group consensus.

    Even if you get in trouble for being part of that consensus, (1) you were only a very small part and (2) fixing Climate is going to involve some risks. As risks go, that's a pretty modest one to take. Do your part. Push the line. The world is counting on you.

    Probably these things are on budgeted funding cycles, so fighting the notion that this can be scheduled, by pushing the next meeting into the same cycle might get some visibility about the fact that the problem is getting worse.

    I'll make a loose analogy, because that's my style and how I think. At a restaurant, if things go wrong in a small way, a manager might give you a free appetizer or dessert. This might feel satisfying, but is probably budgeted. If the problem is bad enough, ask for your whole meal comped. It's a proper response, but it has an important difference. Probably someone will have to answer for it. A higher manager will say "hey, that's unusual. What's that about?" The free appetizer or free dessert isn't just budgeted, but it also doesn't get visibility up the chain so nothing gets fixed. The system knows it is flawed, so it keeps on being flawed and solves the problem by budgets, not by action.

    The Climate problem is TOO BUDGETED. But it is a real, not-going-away problem that is worth spending every resource on earth to fix, because every resource on earth is in dire peril just now. Do not behave like this is something that has to fit in a neat box. It does not. The people saying it does are content to see mass death or even extinction. Do not let them have the final word.

    People right now seem to meet because it's that time of year. Like it's almost a vacation. Something fun to look forward to all year. To me, that sends the signal that there is no problem. Not in words, but in deeds. Is that the signal you want to send?

    One way to make there be a real visibility is to change something that forces the whole management structure (countries, probably, but maybe some big corporations) to have to see it differently.

    It also gives the media something to write about rather than just phoning in the previous year's articles with the dates changed.

    As I said, just an idea. Well, two of them really. Stay longer, meet more often. But if it's an emergency (and it is), it warrants emergency action, not just routine action.

    And it's a problem that's accelerating, but the meeting frequency is not. Is the danger of that dissonance not apparent to everyone? Why not?

    #Climate #ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency #collapse #extinction #conference #COP #COP30 #meetings #media #journalism #ClimateNews #psychology #acceleration #nonlinear #politics #ClimateAction #ClimateInaction

  5. @SnowyCA

    While we're urging things..

    I urge it to not close up shop at the end if things have not resolved. Staying is expensive, and I'll come back to that, but it also says "it matters to resolve this". You can't just walk away from things that matter.

    By contrast, postponing to another year's meeting sends a very strong signal (possibly the ONLY signal anyone up the management chain hears) that this is a routine, linear, manageable problem, not an emergency, exponential, must-fix one. So phone in to your office and say you're there until you have resolution.

    If you really MUST break, break for less than a year. Maybe you literally don't have funding to stay. Well, get agreement among participants that the next meeting is sooner than a year. Management can't argue against that because that's a group consensus.

    Even if you get in trouble for being part of that consensus, (1) you were only a very small part and (2) fixing Climate is going to involve some risks. As risks go, that's a pretty modest one to take. Do your part. Push the line. The world is counting on you.

    Probably these things are on budgeted funding cycles, so fighting the notion that this can be scheduled, by pushing the next meeting into the same cycle might get some visibility about the fact that the problem is getting worse.

    I'll make a loose analogy, because that's my style and how I think. At a restaurant, if things go wrong in a small way, a manager might give you a free appetizer or dessert. This might feel satisfying, but is probably budgeted. If the problem is bad enough, ask for your whole meal comped. It's a proper response, but it has an important difference. Probably someone will have to answer for it. A higher manager will say "hey, that's unusual. What's that about?" The free appetizer or free dessert isn't just budgeted, but it also doesn't get visibility up the chain so nothing gets fixed. The system knows it is flawed, so it keeps on being flawed and solves the problem by budgets, not by action.

    The Climate problem is TOO BUDGETED. But it is a real, not-going-away problem that is worth spending every resource on earth to fix, because every resource on earth is in dire peril just now. Do not behave like this is something that has to fit in a neat box. It does not. The people saying it does are content to see mass death or even extinction. Do not let them have the final word.

    People right now seem to meet because it's that time of year. Like it's almost a vacation. Something fun to look forward to all year. To me, that sends the signal that there is no problem. Not in words, but in deeds. Is that the signal you want to send?

    One way to make there be a real visibility is to change something that forces the whole management structure (countries, probably, but maybe some big corporations) to have to see it differently.

    It also gives the media something to write about rather than just phoning in the previous year's articles with the dates changed.

    As I said, just an idea. Well, two of them really. Stay longer, meet more often. But if it's an emergency (and it is), it warrants emergency action, not just routine action.

    And it's a problem that's accelerating, but the meeting frequency is not. Is the danger of that dissonance not apparent to everyone? Why not?

    #Climate #ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency #collapse #extinction #conference #COP #COP30 #meetings #media #journalism #ClimateNews #psychology #acceleration #nonlinear #politics #ClimateAction #ClimateInaction

  6. @SnowyCA

    While we're urging things..

    I urge it to not close up shop at the end if things have not resolved. Staying is expensive, and I'll come back to that, but it also says "it matters to resolve this". You can't just walk away from things that matter.

    By contrast, postponing to another year's meeting sends a very strong signal (possibly the ONLY signal anyone up the management chain hears) that this is a routine, linear, manageable problem, not an emergency, exponential, must-fix one. So phone in to your office and say you're there until you have resolution.

    If you really MUST break, break for less than a year. Maybe you literally don't have funding to stay. Well, get agreement among participants that the next meeting is sooner than a year. Management can't argue against that because that's a group consensus.

    Even if you get in trouble for being part of that consensus, (1) you were only a very small part and (2) fixing Climate is going to involve some risks. As risks go, that's a pretty modest one to take. Do your part. Push the line. The world is counting on you.

    Probably these things are on budgeted funding cycles, so fighting the notion that this can be scheduled, by pushing the next meeting into the same cycle might get some visibility about the fact that the problem is getting worse.

    I'll make a loose analogy, because that's my style and how I think. At a restaurant, if things go wrong in a small way, a manager might give you a free appetizer or dessert. This might feel satisfying, but is probably budgeted. If the problem is bad enough, ask for your whole meal comped. It's a proper response, but it has an important difference. Probably someone will have to answer for it. A higher manager will say "hey, that's unusual. What's that about?" The free appetizer or free dessert isn't just budgeted, but it also doesn't get visibility up the chain so nothing gets fixed. The system knows it is flawed, so it keeps on being flawed and solves the problem by budgets, not by action.

    The Climate problem is TOO BUDGETED. But it is a real, not-going-away problem that is worth spending every resource on earth to fix, because every resource on earth is in dire peril just now. Do not behave like this is something that has to fit in a neat box. It does not. The people saying it does are content to see mass death or even extinction. Do not let them have the final word.

    People right now seem to meet because it's that time of year. Like it's almost a vacation. Something fun to look forward to all year. To me, that sends the signal that there is no problem. Not in words, but in deeds. Is that the signal you want to send?

    One way to make there be a real visibility is to change something that forces the whole management structure (countries, probably, but maybe some big corporations) to have to see it differently.

    It also gives the media something to write about rather than just phoning in the previous year's articles with the dates changed.

    As I said, just an idea. Well, two of them really. Stay longer, meet more often. But if it's an emergency (and it is), it warrants emergency action, not just routine action.

    And it's a problem that's accelerating, but the meeting frequency is not. Is the danger of that dissonance not apparent to everyone? Why not?

    #Climate #ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency #collapse #extinction #conference #COP #COP30 #meetings #media #journalism #ClimateNews #psychology #acceleration #nonlinear #politics #ClimateAction #ClimateInaction

  7. @SnowyCA

    While we're urging things..

    I urge it to not close up shop at the end if things have not resolved. Staying is expensive, and I'll come back to that, but it also says "it matters to resolve this". You can't just walk away from things that matter.

    By contrast, postponing to another year's meeting sends a very strong signal (possibly the ONLY signal anyone up the management chain hears) that this is a routine, linear, manageable problem, not an emergency, exponential, must-fix one. So phone in to your office and say you're there until you have resolution.

    If you really MUST break, break for less than a year. Maybe you literally don't have funding to stay. Well, get agreement among participants that the next meeting is sooner than a year. Management can't argue against that because that's a group consensus.

    Even if you get in trouble for being part of that consensus, (1) you were only a very small part and (2) fixing Climate is going to involve some risks. As risks go, that's a pretty modest one to take. Do your part. Push the line. The world is counting on you.

    Probably these things are on budgeted funding cycles, so fighting the notion that this can be scheduled, by pushing the next meeting into the same cycle might get some visibility about the fact that the problem is getting worse.

    I'll make a loose analogy, because that's my style and how I think. At a restaurant, if things go wrong in a small way, a manager might give you a free appetizer or dessert. This might feel satisfying, but is probably budgeted. If the problem is bad enough, ask for your whole meal comped. It's a proper response, but it has an important difference. Probably someone will have to answer for it. A higher manager will say "hey, that's unusual. What's that about?" The free appetizer or free dessert isn't just budgeted, but it also doesn't get visibility up the chain so nothing gets fixed. The system knows it is flawed, so it keeps on being flawed and solves the problem by budgets, not by action.

    The Climate problem is TOO BUDGETED. But it is a real, not-going-away problem that is worth spending every resource on earth to fix, because every resource on earth is in dire peril just now. Do not behave like this is something that has to fit in a neat box. It does not. The people saying it does are content to see mass death or even extinction. Do not let them have the final word.

    People right now seem to meet because it's that time of year. Like it's almost a vacation. Something fun to look forward to all year. To me, that sends the signal that there is no problem. Not in words, but in deeds. Is that the signal you want to send?

    One way to make there be a real visibility is to change something that forces the whole management structure (countries, probably, but maybe some big corporations) to have to see it differently.

    It also gives the media something to write about rather than just phoning in the previous year's articles with the dates changed.

    As I said, just an idea. Well, two of them really. Stay longer, meet more often. But if it's an emergency (and it is), it warrants emergency action, not just routine action.

    And it's a problem that's accelerating, but the meeting frequency is not. Is the danger of that dissonance not apparent to everyone? Why not?

    #Climate #ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency #collapse #extinction #conference #COP #COP30 #meetings #media #journalism #ClimateNews #psychology #acceleration #nonlinear #politics #ClimateAction #ClimateInaction

  8. Mình đã xây dựng Graphite: Chỗ.space trực quan không tuyến tính cho LLM, biến chat局域 thành bản đồ ý tưởng (Python/Ollama)! 🌐
    Giúp bạn theo dõi partidos nghista, tạo biểu đồological từ dữ liệu trong node. 100%Offline ratios nhờ Ollama.
    #Graphite #AI #Ollama #Python #NonLinear #DataPrivacy #VisualAI

    reddit.com/r/ollama/comments/1

  9. Mình đã xây dựng Graphite: Chỗ.space trực quan không tuyến tính cho LLM, biến chat局域 thành bản đồ ý tưởng (Python/Ollama)! 🌐
    Giúp bạn theo dõi partidos nghista, tạo biểu đồological từ dữ liệu trong node. 100%Offline ratios nhờ Ollama.
    #Graphite #AI #Ollama #Python #NonLinear #DataPrivacy #VisualAI

    reddit.com/r/ollama/comments/1

  10. Designing nonlinearity in a current-starved ring oscillator for reservoir computing hardware

    Jaeger, H. & Haas, H. Harnessing nonlinearity: predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication. Scienc…
    #NewsBeep #News #Computing #AU #Australia #Current-starvedringoscillator #Energyscienceandtechnology #Engineering #Frequency #HumanitiesandSocialSciences #learning #multidisciplinary #Nonlinear #Physics #Reservoircomputing #Science #Technology
    newsbeep.com/au/182302/

  11. Designing nonlinearity in a current-starved ring oscillator for reservoir computing hardware

    Jaeger, H. & Haas, H. Harnessing nonlinearity: predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication. Sc…
    #NewsBeep #News #Computing #Current-starvedringoscillator #Energyscienceandtechnology #Engineering #Frequency #HumanitiesandSocialSciences #learning #multidisciplinary #Nonlinear #Physics #Reservoircomputing #Science #Technology #UK #UnitedKingdom
    newsbeep.com/uk/172553/

  12. New paper!

    If you want to assess the stability of the synchronization of a system of identical oscillators, you can use the Master Stability Function. However, what do you do in a real-world case, when the elements of the system are not exactly identical? We show how to extend the formalism and use it also when there are many-body interactions, such as in a simplicial complex.

    journals.aps.org/prresearch/ab

    #mathematics #physics #science #synchronization #stability #chaos #MSF #simplicialcomplex #complexity #nonlinear #dynamics

  13. journals.aps.org/prresearch/ab

    New paper!

    In Greek mythology, the Chimera was a monster composed of parts of three different animals. But then, why do chimera states in nonlinear dynamics consist of only two different states?

    Discover how to create three-state chimeras, and Make Chimeras Monstrous Again Ⓡ!

    #mathematics #physics #chaos #nonlinear #dynamics #chimera #bifurcation #complexity #complexsystems #pattern #patternformation

  14. journals.aps.org/prresearch/ab

    New paper!

    In Greek mythology, the Chimera was a monster composed of parts of three different animals. But then, why do chimera states in nonlinear dynamics consist of only two different states?

    Discover how to create three-state chimeras, and Make Chimeras Monstrous Again Ⓡ!

    #mathematics #physics #chaos #nonlinear #dynamics #chimera #bifurcation #complexity #complexsystems #pattern #patternformation

  15. journals.aps.org/prresearch/ab

    New paper!

    In Greek mythology, the Chimera was a monster composed of parts of three different animals. But then, why do chimera states in nonlinear dynamics consist of only two different states?

    Discover how to create three-state chimeras, and Make Chimeras Monstrous Again Ⓡ!

    #mathematics #physics #chaos #nonlinear #dynamics #chimera #bifurcation #complexity #complexsystems #pattern #patternformation

  16. journals.aps.org/prresearch/ab

    New paper!

    In Greek mythology, the Chimera was a monster composed of parts of three different animals. But then, why do chimera states in nonlinear dynamics consist of only two different states?

    Discover how to create three-state chimeras, and Make Chimeras Monstrous Again Ⓡ!

    #mathematics #physics #chaos #nonlinear #dynamics #chimera #bifurcation #complexity #complexsystems #pattern #patternformation

  17. The above is only strictly true for “small” amplitudes. If the #pendulum is subject to large amplitudes, it is no longer governed by the simple linear differential equations alluded to above. Given that the rod remains rigid and no energy is dissipated, the pendulum #equations may still be solved exactly, though they are now #nonlinear.

    #MyWork #CCBYSA #Mathematics #ClassicalMechanics #AppliedMathematics #Physics #Animation

  18. The above is only strictly true for “small” amplitudes. If the #pendulum is subject to large amplitudes, it is no longer governed by the simple linear differential equations alluded to above. Given that the rod remains rigid and no energy is dissipated, the pendulum #equations may still be solved exactly, though they are now #nonlinear.

    #MyWork #CCBYSA #Mathematics #ClassicalMechanics #AppliedMathematics #Physics #Animation

  19. The above is only strictly true for “small” amplitudes. If the #pendulum is subject to large amplitudes, it is no longer governed by the simple linear differential equations alluded to above. Given that the rod remains rigid and no energy is dissipated, the pendulum #equations may still be solved exactly, though they are now #nonlinear.

    #MyWork #CCBYSA #Mathematics #ClassicalMechanics #AppliedMathematics #Physics #Animation

  20. The above is only strictly true for “small” amplitudes. If the #pendulum is subject to large amplitudes, it is no longer governed by the simple linear differential equations alluded to above. Given that the rod remains rigid and no energy is dissipated, the pendulum #equations may still be solved exactly, though they are now #nonlinear.

    #MyWork #CCBYSA #Mathematics #ClassicalMechanics #AppliedMathematics #Physics #Animation

  21. The above is only strictly true for “small” amplitudes. If the #pendulum is subject to large amplitudes, it is no longer governed by the simple linear differential equations alluded to above. Given that the rod remains rigid and no energy is dissipated, the pendulum #equations may still be solved exactly, though they are now #nonlinear.

    #MyWork #CCBYSA #Mathematics #ClassicalMechanics #AppliedMathematics #Physics #Animation

  22. @smt @lauren

    I finally got around to watching #Oppenheimer. Besides the #nonlinear narrative, my criticisms would be similar to Lauren's as well - incredible technical achievements in producing what appears to be period-authentic scenery, sets, and props, and fantastic visuals, but in service of a somewhat lame, too-Hollywood script.

    #Nolan's going to get pegged as a one-trick pony, like #Shyamalan (if he hasn't already...) with the nonlinear #storytelling. You're right that it was totally unnecessary here; this story could have been told start-to-finish and not lost one iota of its message or power. Arguably the opposite.

    In Memento, the "two narrative threads with one played backwards" thing was essential to the story. Here the temporal slice-and-dice is a needless distraction, a "Mommy, watch me!" affectation. It detracts from the story.

    The cheap #melodrama is annoying too, but it's hard to get worked up about that as long as the "look at what a twisted web I can weave" attitude is there to complain about.

  23. Random quick reminder: is still completely bullshit free. It only features some sort of called usual

  24. @sascha_wolfer

    I'd say that most things that survive (locally) for long periods of time make the same #evolutionary adjustment.

    High efficiency is not #sustainable, unless periodic catastrophic crashes (in number) are tolerable.

    OTOH, most systems do not come to this accord on their own, the environment in which it lives constrains optimal #efficiency attainable.

    #nonlinear #incompleteness #limits

  25. 'Fixed points of nonnegative neural networks', by Tomasz J. Piotrowski, Renato L. G. Cavalcante, Mateusz Gabor.

    jmlr.org/papers/v25/23-0167.ht

    #nonnegative #nonlinear #convex

  26. 'Fixed points of nonnegative neural networks', by Tomasz J. Piotrowski, Renato L. G. Cavalcante, Mateusz Gabor.

    jmlr.org/papers/v25/23-0167.ht

    #nonnegative #nonlinear #convex

  27. 'Fixed points of nonnegative neural networks', by Tomasz J. Piotrowski, Renato L. G. Cavalcante, Mateusz Gabor.

    jmlr.org/papers/v25/23-0167.ht

    #nonnegative #nonlinear #convex

  28. 'Fixed points of nonnegative neural networks', by Tomasz J. Piotrowski, Renato L. G. Cavalcante, Mateusz Gabor.

    jmlr.org/papers/v25/23-0167.ht

    #nonnegative #nonlinear #convex

  29. 'Fixed points of nonnegative neural networks', by Tomasz J. Piotrowski, Renato L. G. Cavalcante, Mateusz Gabor.

    jmlr.org/papers/v25/23-0167.ht

    #nonnegative #nonlinear #convex

  30. i wonder if it's possible to make a video game that would teach kids the intuition behind the "butterfly effect" by making each subsequent level's initial conditions determined by the outcome of the previous level, in such a way that the gameplay would guide you towards understanding that tiny decisions made on the first level will have huge consequences on level two, etc. #chaos #butterflyEffect #chaosTheory #deterministic #systems #nonlinear #differentialEquations #bifurcation cc @JamesGleick

  31. "Thin films of this compound were connected to photo-conductive switches with co-planar #waveguides. We observe characteristic #nonlinear current-voltage responses, which in these films point to photo-induced granular #superconductivity. Although these dynamics are not necessarily identical to those reported for the powder samples studied so far, they provide valuable new information on the nature of the light-induced superconducting-like state above equilibrium Tc"

    nature.com/articles/s41467-023

  32. 'Neural Q-learning for solving PDEs', by Samuel N. Cohen, Deqing Jiang, Justin Sirignano.

    jmlr.org/papers/v24/22-1075.ht

    #pdes #pde #nonlinear

  33. Hey I know people often complained about ChatGPT producing made-up referrences but it seems legit when being asked to produce some reading lists. People who are focused on similar subjects as me might also find some useful stuff in this recommended list.
    drive.google.com/file/d/1mUpXo

    #complexity #dynamicsystem #nonlinear #chaos #ecology #postkeynesian #marxian #economics #computational #quantitative #statistics

  34. #Following is a very good #NeoNoir, reminiscent in some ways of the excellent #BloodSimple.

    There's a surprising amount of tension that stays throughout even though the whole #movie is low-key, with a leisurely pace.

    It has #Nolan's now-signature #nonlinear #timeline with a device that makes it easy to keep track of what's, when.

    Clever #plot and slow unpeeling of its layers keep the truth well-hidden, even when you think you know what's happening, in true #noir fashion.

  35. Alternative video editors | FLOWBLADE 🎞️

    Flowblade is a work in progress multitrack non-linear video editor for Linux released under GPL3 license.

    * Full track compositing
    * Smooth keyframe interpolations
    * GPU rendering
    * UX papercuts
    * Drag 'n drop clips / timeline
    * etc.

    Flowblade's starting to be an impressive libre choice for video editing needs!

    => github.com/jliljebl/flowblade/

    => flathub.org/apps/io.github.jli

    #video #editor #Flowblade #GPL #nonlinear #multitrack #Linux #aarch64 #libre #free

  36. singular #neuroscience @docartemis #scicomm calm #neuropod dialogue with @PessoaBrain new renewed voice!

    » seems to be the case now based on anatomical tracing studies, ... the #brain is much more physically interconnected than even is actually needed to have efficient propagation
    ...
    we can study #nonlinear #dynamicalsystems that we can legitimately call #emergent in the sense that it emerges out of the interactions of the elements in the system without any mystery «

    brainsciencepodcast.com/bsp/20

  37. We congratulate Prof #LuisCaffarelli 🥳

    The #WorldMathAbelPrize 2023 was given to Luis Caffarelli, a former member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the
    @ESIVienna. He has been making important contribution to the subject #nonlinear #PartialDifferentialEquations.

    Dive into his work here: abelprize.no
    esi.ac.at/news/n38

    @univienna
    #Abel2023

    Photo by © by Nolan Zunk

  38. `It is considered a non-linear approach as the mapping cannot be represented as a linear combination of the original variables as possible in techniques such as principal component analysis, which also makes it more difficult to use for classification applications`

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sammon_m

    #machineLearning #clustering #classification #featureExtraction #featureEngineering #featureSelection #featureRanking #dimensionalityReduction #nonlinear

  39. `It is considered a non-linear approach as the mapping cannot be represented as a linear combination of the original variables as possible in techniques such as principal component analysis, which also makes it more difficult to use for classification applications`

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sammon_m

    #machineLearning #clustering #classification #featureExtraction #featureEngineering #featureSelection #featureRanking #dimensionalityReduction #nonlinear

  40. `It is considered a non-linear approach as the mapping cannot be represented as a linear combination of the original variables as possible in techniques such as principal component analysis, which also makes it more difficult to use for classification applications`

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sammon_m

    #machineLearning #clustering #classification #featureExtraction #featureEngineering #featureSelection #featureRanking #dimensionalityReduction #nonlinear

  41. `It is considered a non-linear approach as the mapping cannot be represented as a linear combination of the original variables as possible in techniques such as principal component analysis, which also makes it more difficult to use for classification applications`

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sammon_m

    #machineLearning #clustering #classification #featureExtraction #featureEngineering #featureSelection #featureRanking #dimensionalityReduction #nonlinear