home.social

#redd — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #redd, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Las mujeres que replantan el futuro de la Argentina

    Las mujeres que replantan el futuro de la Argentina
    Cuando Iracema Da Luz Ferreyra pasea por las parcelas sombreadas de Colonia Alegría, ve algo más que árboles. Ve un futuro para su chacra, una pequeña explotación familiar que ha pasado de generación en generación. “Imagino mi chacra dentro de 10 años con muchas más p [...]

    #Argentina #Biodiversidad #ExplotaciónFamiliar #FAO #Mujeres #Mundo #REDD+ #RegionesForestales

    elmundo.cr/mundo/las-mujeres-q

  2. Smashed Patersholfeesten / Kanon Rythms @ Cafe 't Kanon - 15 Aug feat. Pit Crew, Red D, Bafana

    #SESH #PitCrew #RedD #Bafana

    sesh.sx/events/12234246

  3. New publication on #GlobalSouth agency in global #climate norm development with the example how #India helped shape the 2007 #Bali #COP outcomes on developing countries' mitigation efforts #NAMAs and #REDD+ from @wupperinst colleague Chris Höhne sciencedirect.com/science/arti

  4. Suelos forestales: clave en la lucha contra el cambio climático

    Suelos forestales: clave en la lucha contra el cambio climático
    Heredia, 21 mar (elmundo.cr) – En el marco del Día Internacional de los Bosques, el Instituto de Investigación y Servicios Forestales de la Universidad Nacional (Inisefor [...]

    #Bosques #CambioClimático #CarbonoOrgánicoDelSuelo #CostaRica #DíaInternacionalDeLosBosques #FinanciamientoClimático #Inisefor-UNA #MercadosDeCarbono #Mitigación #REDD+

    elmundo.cr/costa-rica/suelos-f

  5. Suelos forestales: clave en la lucha contra el cambio climático

    Suelos forestales: clave en la lucha contra el cambio climático
    Heredia, 21 mar (elmundo.cr) – En el marco del Día Internacional de los Bosques, el Instituto de Investigación y Servicios Forestales de la Universidad Nacional (Inisefor [...]

    #Bosques #CambioClimático #CarbonoOrgánicoDelSuelo #CostaRica #DíaInternacionalDeLosBosques #FinanciamientoClimático #Inisefor-UNA #MercadosDeCarbono #Mitigación #REDD+

    elmundo.cr/costa-rica/suelos-f

  6. Suelos forestales: clave en la lucha contra el cambio climático

    Suelos forestales: clave en la lucha contra el cambio climático
    Heredia, 21 mar (elmundo.cr) – En el marco del Día Internacional de los Bosques, el Instituto de Investigación y Servicios Forestales de la Universidad Nacional (Inisefor [...]

    #Bosques #CambioClimático #CarbonoOrgánicoDelSuelo #CostaRica #DíaInternacionalDeLosBosques #FinanciamientoClimático #Inisefor-UNA #MercadosDeCarbono #Mitigación #REDD+

    elmundo.cr/costa-rica/suelos-f

  7. Suelos forestales: clave en la lucha contra el cambio climático

    Suelos forestales: clave en la lucha contra el cambio climático
    Heredia, 21 mar (elmundo.cr) – En el marco del Día Internacional de los Bosques, el Instituto de Investigación y Servicios Forestales de la Universidad Nacional (Inisefor [...]

    #Bosques #CambioClimático #CarbonoOrgánicoDelSuelo #CostaRica #DíaInternacionalDeLosBosques #FinanciamientoClimático #Inisefor-UNA #MercadosDeCarbono #Mitigación #REDD+

    elmundo.cr/costa-rica/suelos-f

  8. From the Bretton Woods Project: #Forests

    "Finally, the [#WorldBank] ’s #forest policy and #WeakSafeguards on #ForestProtection have also been observed to infringe the rights of local communities and have failed to protect one of the planet’s most important ‘#CarbonSinks’ (see Observer Spring 2017). CSOs have called for the Bank to open up its Forest Notes – which are meant to guide the interface between its lending and forests – to consultation (see Observer Winter 2017-2018). CSOs have also been highly critical of one of the forest initiatives the Bank manages, the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), a climate investment fund that supports Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) projects. A March 2017 post in REDD Monitor called the FCPF, 'the most cost-inefficient tree-saving scheme ever,' owing to high administrative costs between fiscal years 2009-2015 absorbing 64 per cent of FCFP’s $55 million expenditure. More generally, the Bank’s overall approach to lending has undermined the protection of vital natural ecosystems in borrower countries. As noted by Bruce Rich in his influential 2013 book, Foreclosing the Future: The World Bank and the Politics of Environmental Destruction, 'When one examines the failures to conserve ecosystems, or to mitigate environmental impacts of development, one finds that failed governance at all levels is almost invariably at the root. …Many of [the Bank’s] problems are associated with a dysfunctional institutional culture in which the relentless pressure to move money out the door, even in violation of the Bank’s own policies and rules, often overrides all other considerations.'"

    2017: World Bank policy lending undermines climate goals

    "One of the main problems is the Bank’s refusal to adequately assess the social and environmental risks of their policy loans" - Harlem Mariño, Derechos, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales

    6 April 2017

    "A late January report by US-based NGO Bank Information Center (BIC), together with partners in Egypt, Indonesia, Mozambique and Peru, claimed that the Bank is undermining its climate commitments by supporting investment incentives for coal, gas and oil projects through its development policy financing (DPF) mechanism. DPF accounts for approximately a third of all Bank funding and provides resources for programmes of policy and institutional reforms that are agreed by the Bank and the borrowing government (see Update 82). The report argued that the Bank’s financing through DPF contradicts the internationally agreed and Bank-supported goal of limiting the global average temperature increase to 2°C, which according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change would require that at least two-thirds of existing fossil fuel reserves are left in the ground.

    "BIC’s report looked at the Bank’s DPF measures in four countries: Egypt, Indonesia, Mozambique and Peru. It found that DPF introduced subsidies for coal in all countries, apart from Peru. For example, the report argued that Bank-supported subsidies for coal infrastructure have helped Indonesia become one of the world’s top coal exporters. It found some DPF support for renewable energy, but argued that the Bank could do more given that all countries examined have potential to develop renewable energy. For example, while Peru’s DPF provides subsidies to public-private partnerships to develop oil and gas infrastructure, it does not include plans for solar or wind power projects."

    brettonwoodsproject.org/2017/0

    #FCPF #REDD #Ecosystems #ProtectTheForests #EnvironmentalDestruction #ForestDegradation #Deforestation #EnvironmentalImpacts #Egypt #Indonesia #Mozambique #Peru #LeaveItInTheGround #Coal #BigOilAndGas #ExtractiveIndustries #Exploitation #EnvironmentalImpacts
    #HumanRights #ParisAgreement
    #ParisClimateAgreement #BigOilAndGas #CorporateColonialism #IMFLoanSharks #RenewablesNow

  9. From the Bretton Woods Project: #Forests

    "Finally, the [#WorldBank] ’s #forest policy and #WeakSafeguards on #ForestProtection have also been observed to infringe the rights of local communities and have failed to protect one of the planet’s most important ‘#CarbonSinks’ (see Observer Spring 2017). CSOs have called for the Bank to open up its Forest Notes – which are meant to guide the interface between its lending and forests – to consultation (see Observer Winter 2017-2018). CSOs have also been highly critical of one of the forest initiatives the Bank manages, the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), a climate investment fund that supports Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) projects. A March 2017 post in REDD Monitor called the FCPF, 'the most cost-inefficient tree-saving scheme ever,' owing to high administrative costs between fiscal years 2009-2015 absorbing 64 per cent of FCFP’s $55 million expenditure. More generally, the Bank’s overall approach to lending has undermined the protection of vital natural ecosystems in borrower countries. As noted by Bruce Rich in his influential 2013 book, Foreclosing the Future: The World Bank and the Politics of Environmental Destruction, 'When one examines the failures to conserve ecosystems, or to mitigate environmental impacts of development, one finds that failed governance at all levels is almost invariably at the root. …Many of [the Bank’s] problems are associated with a dysfunctional institutional culture in which the relentless pressure to move money out the door, even in violation of the Bank’s own policies and rules, often overrides all other considerations.'"

    2017: World Bank policy lending undermines climate goals

    "One of the main problems is the Bank’s refusal to adequately assess the social and environmental risks of their policy loans" - Harlem Mariño, Derechos, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales

    6 April 2017

    "A late January report by US-based NGO Bank Information Center (BIC), together with partners in Egypt, Indonesia, Mozambique and Peru, claimed that the Bank is undermining its climate commitments by supporting investment incentives for coal, gas and oil projects through its development policy financing (DPF) mechanism. DPF accounts for approximately a third of all Bank funding and provides resources for programmes of policy and institutional reforms that are agreed by the Bank and the borrowing government (see Update 82). The report argued that the Bank’s financing through DPF contradicts the internationally agreed and Bank-supported goal of limiting the global average temperature increase to 2°C, which according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change would require that at least two-thirds of existing fossil fuel reserves are left in the ground.

    "BIC’s report looked at the Bank’s DPF measures in four countries: Egypt, Indonesia, Mozambique and Peru. It found that DPF introduced subsidies for coal in all countries, apart from Peru. For example, the report argued that Bank-supported subsidies for coal infrastructure have helped Indonesia become one of the world’s top coal exporters. It found some DPF support for renewable energy, but argued that the Bank could do more given that all countries examined have potential to develop renewable energy. For example, while Peru’s DPF provides subsidies to public-private partnerships to develop oil and gas infrastructure, it does not include plans for solar or wind power projects."

    brettonwoodsproject.org/2017/0

    #FCPF #REDD #Ecosystems #ProtectTheForests #EnvironmentalDestruction #ForestDegradation #Deforestation #EnvironmentalImpacts #Egypt #Indonesia #Mozambique #Peru #LeaveItInTheGround #Coal #BigOilAndGas #ExtractiveIndustries #Exploitation #EnvironmentalImpacts
    #HumanRights #ParisAgreement
    #ParisClimateAgreement #BigOilAndGas #CorporateColonialism #IMFLoanSharks #RenewablesNow

  10. From the Bretton Woods Project: #Forests

    "Finally, the [#WorldBank] ’s #forest policy and #WeakSafeguards on #ForestProtection have also been observed to infringe the rights of local communities and have failed to protect one of the planet’s most important ‘#CarbonSinks’ (see Observer Spring 2017). CSOs have called for the Bank to open up its Forest Notes – which are meant to guide the interface between its lending and forests – to consultation (see Observer Winter 2017-2018). CSOs have also been highly critical of one of the forest initiatives the Bank manages, the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), a climate investment fund that supports Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) projects. A March 2017 post in REDD Monitor called the FCPF, 'the most cost-inefficient tree-saving scheme ever,' owing to high administrative costs between fiscal years 2009-2015 absorbing 64 per cent of FCFP’s $55 million expenditure. More generally, the Bank’s overall approach to lending has undermined the protection of vital natural ecosystems in borrower countries. As noted by Bruce Rich in his influential 2013 book, Foreclosing the Future: The World Bank and the Politics of Environmental Destruction, 'When one examines the failures to conserve ecosystems, or to mitigate environmental impacts of development, one finds that failed governance at all levels is almost invariably at the root. …Many of [the Bank’s] problems are associated with a dysfunctional institutional culture in which the relentless pressure to move money out the door, even in violation of the Bank’s own policies and rules, often overrides all other considerations.'"

    2017: World Bank policy lending undermines climate goals

    "One of the main problems is the Bank’s refusal to adequately assess the social and environmental risks of their policy loans" - Harlem Mariño, Derechos, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales

    6 April 2017

    "A late January report by US-based NGO Bank Information Center (BIC), together with partners in Egypt, Indonesia, Mozambique and Peru, claimed that the Bank is undermining its climate commitments by supporting investment incentives for coal, gas and oil projects through its development policy financing (DPF) mechanism. DPF accounts for approximately a third of all Bank funding and provides resources for programmes of policy and institutional reforms that are agreed by the Bank and the borrowing government (see Update 82). The report argued that the Bank’s financing through DPF contradicts the internationally agreed and Bank-supported goal of limiting the global average temperature increase to 2°C, which according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change would require that at least two-thirds of existing fossil fuel reserves are left in the ground.

    "BIC’s report looked at the Bank’s DPF measures in four countries: Egypt, Indonesia, Mozambique and Peru. It found that DPF introduced subsidies for coal in all countries, apart from Peru. For example, the report argued that Bank-supported subsidies for coal infrastructure have helped Indonesia become one of the world’s top coal exporters. It found some DPF support for renewable energy, but argued that the Bank could do more given that all countries examined have potential to develop renewable energy. For example, while Peru’s DPF provides subsidies to public-private partnerships to develop oil and gas infrastructure, it does not include plans for solar or wind power projects."

    brettonwoodsproject.org/2017/0

    #FCPF #REDD #Ecosystems #ProtectTheForests #EnvironmentalDestruction #ForestDegradation #Deforestation #EnvironmentalImpacts #Egypt #Indonesia #Mozambique #Peru #LeaveItInTheGround #Coal #BigOilAndGas #ExtractiveIndustries #Exploitation #EnvironmentalImpacts
    #HumanRights #ParisAgreement
    #ParisClimateAgreement #BigOilAndGas #CorporateColonialism #IMFLoanSharks #RenewablesNow

  11. From the Bretton Woods Project: #Forests

    "Finally, the [#WorldBank] ’s #forest policy and #WeakSafeguards on #ForestProtection have also been observed to infringe the rights of local communities and have failed to protect one of the planet’s most important ‘#CarbonSinks’ (see Observer Spring 2017). CSOs have called for the Bank to open up its Forest Notes – which are meant to guide the interface between its lending and forests – to consultation (see Observer Winter 2017-2018). CSOs have also been highly critical of one of the forest initiatives the Bank manages, the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), a climate investment fund that supports Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) projects. A March 2017 post in REDD Monitor called the FCPF, 'the most cost-inefficient tree-saving scheme ever,' owing to high administrative costs between fiscal years 2009-2015 absorbing 64 per cent of FCFP’s $55 million expenditure. More generally, the Bank’s overall approach to lending has undermined the protection of vital natural ecosystems in borrower countries. As noted by Bruce Rich in his influential 2013 book, Foreclosing the Future: The World Bank and the Politics of Environmental Destruction, 'When one examines the failures to conserve ecosystems, or to mitigate environmental impacts of development, one finds that failed governance at all levels is almost invariably at the root. …Many of [the Bank’s] problems are associated with a dysfunctional institutional culture in which the relentless pressure to move money out the door, even in violation of the Bank’s own policies and rules, often overrides all other considerations.'"

    2017: World Bank policy lending undermines climate goals

    "One of the main problems is the Bank’s refusal to adequately assess the social and environmental risks of their policy loans" - Harlem Mariño, Derechos, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales

    6 April 2017

    "A late January report by US-based NGO Bank Information Center (BIC), together with partners in Egypt, Indonesia, Mozambique and Peru, claimed that the Bank is undermining its climate commitments by supporting investment incentives for coal, gas and oil projects through its development policy financing (DPF) mechanism. DPF accounts for approximately a third of all Bank funding and provides resources for programmes of policy and institutional reforms that are agreed by the Bank and the borrowing government (see Update 82). The report argued that the Bank’s financing through DPF contradicts the internationally agreed and Bank-supported goal of limiting the global average temperature increase to 2°C, which according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change would require that at least two-thirds of existing fossil fuel reserves are left in the ground.

    "BIC’s report looked at the Bank’s DPF measures in four countries: Egypt, Indonesia, Mozambique and Peru. It found that DPF introduced subsidies for coal in all countries, apart from Peru. For example, the report argued that Bank-supported subsidies for coal infrastructure have helped Indonesia become one of the world’s top coal exporters. It found some DPF support for renewable energy, but argued that the Bank could do more given that all countries examined have potential to develop renewable energy. For example, while Peru’s DPF provides subsidies to public-private partnerships to develop oil and gas infrastructure, it does not include plans for solar or wind power projects."

    brettonwoodsproject.org/2017/0

    #FCPF #REDD #Ecosystems #ProtectTheForests #EnvironmentalDestruction #ForestDegradation #Deforestation #EnvironmentalImpacts #Egypt #Indonesia #Mozambique #Peru #LeaveItInTheGround #Coal #BigOilAndGas #ExtractiveIndustries #Exploitation #EnvironmentalImpacts
    #HumanRights #ParisAgreement
    #ParisClimateAgreement #BigOilAndGas #CorporateColonialism #IMFLoanSharks #RenewablesNow

  12. From the Bretton Woods Project: #Forests

    "Finally, the [#WorldBank] ’s #forest policy and #WeakSafeguards on #ForestProtection have also been observed to infringe the rights of local communities and have failed to protect one of the planet’s most important ‘#CarbonSinks’ (see Observer Spring 2017). CSOs have called for the Bank to open up its Forest Notes – which are meant to guide the interface between its lending and forests – to consultation (see Observer Winter 2017-2018). CSOs have also been highly critical of one of the forest initiatives the Bank manages, the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), a climate investment fund that supports Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) projects. A March 2017 post in REDD Monitor called the FCPF, 'the most cost-inefficient tree-saving scheme ever,' owing to high administrative costs between fiscal years 2009-2015 absorbing 64 per cent of FCFP’s $55 million expenditure. More generally, the Bank’s overall approach to lending has undermined the protection of vital natural ecosystems in borrower countries. As noted by Bruce Rich in his influential 2013 book, Foreclosing the Future: The World Bank and the Politics of Environmental Destruction, 'When one examines the failures to conserve ecosystems, or to mitigate environmental impacts of development, one finds that failed governance at all levels is almost invariably at the root. …Many of [the Bank’s] problems are associated with a dysfunctional institutional culture in which the relentless pressure to move money out the door, even in violation of the Bank’s own policies and rules, often overrides all other considerations.'"

    2017: World Bank policy lending undermines climate goals

    "One of the main problems is the Bank’s refusal to adequately assess the social and environmental risks of their policy loans" - Harlem Mariño, Derechos, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales

    6 April 2017

    "A late January report by US-based NGO Bank Information Center (BIC), together with partners in Egypt, Indonesia, Mozambique and Peru, claimed that the Bank is undermining its climate commitments by supporting investment incentives for coal, gas and oil projects through its development policy financing (DPF) mechanism. DPF accounts for approximately a third of all Bank funding and provides resources for programmes of policy and institutional reforms that are agreed by the Bank and the borrowing government (see Update 82). The report argued that the Bank’s financing through DPF contradicts the internationally agreed and Bank-supported goal of limiting the global average temperature increase to 2°C, which according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change would require that at least two-thirds of existing fossil fuel reserves are left in the ground.

    "BIC’s report looked at the Bank’s DPF measures in four countries: Egypt, Indonesia, Mozambique and Peru. It found that DPF introduced subsidies for coal in all countries, apart from Peru. For example, the report argued that Bank-supported subsidies for coal infrastructure have helped Indonesia become one of the world’s top coal exporters. It found some DPF support for renewable energy, but argued that the Bank could do more given that all countries examined have potential to develop renewable energy. For example, while Peru’s DPF provides subsidies to public-private partnerships to develop oil and gas infrastructure, it does not include plans for solar or wind power projects."

    brettonwoodsproject.org/2017/0

    #FCPF #REDD #Ecosystems #ProtectTheForests #EnvironmentalDestruction #ForestDegradation #Deforestation #EnvironmentalImpacts #Egypt #Indonesia #Mozambique #Peru #LeaveItInTheGround #Coal #BigOilAndGas #ExtractiveIndustries #Exploitation #EnvironmentalImpacts
    #HumanRights #ParisAgreement
    #ParisClimateAgreement #BigOilAndGas #CorporateColonialism #IMFLoanSharks #RenewablesNow

  13. Climate policies like REDD+ often fail to prioritize Indigenous peoples, undermining their effectiveness in tackling the root causes of deforestation and climate change, according to a recent study.

    The authors propose 12 principles to improve climate policies, based on themes such as supporting Indigenous territorial defense and their rights, encouraging Indigenous-led climate initiatives.
    #indigenous #REDD+ #climatechange #deforestation
    news.mongabay.com/2024/10/stud

  14. Sinac recibe $22 millones del Banco Mundial para evitar la deforestación en el 26% del territorio nacional

    De acuerdo con datos del Sinac, el 26% del territorio nacional corresponde a áreas silvestres protegidas y la cobertura forestal en el país ronda el 60%, señalaron autoridades.
    La entrada Sinac recibe $22 millones del Banco Mundial para evitar la deforestación en el [...]

    #BancoMundial #Bosques #Deforestación #MINAE #País #REDD+ #SINAC #TalaIlegal #ÁreasProtegidas

    semanariouniversidad.com/pais/

  15. Sinac recibe $22 millones del Banco Mundial para evitar la deforestación en el 26% del territorio nacional

    De acuerdo con datos del Sinac, el 26% del territorio nacional corresponde a áreas silvestres protegidas y la cobertura forestal en el país ronda el 60%, señalaron autoridades.
    La entrada Sinac recibe $22 millones del Banco Mundial para evitar la deforestación en el [...]

    #BancoMundial #Bosques #Deforestación #MINAE #País #REDD+ #SINAC #TalaIlegal #ÁreasProtegidas

    semanariouniversidad.com/pais/

  16. Sinac recibe $22 millones del Banco Mundial para evitar la deforestación en el 26% del territorio nacional

    De acuerdo con datos del Sinac, el 26% del territorio nacional corresponde a áreas silvestres protegidas y la cobertura forestal en el país ronda el 60%, señalaron autoridades.
    La entrada Sinac recibe $22 millones del Banco Mundial para evitar la deforestación en el [...]

    #BancoMundial #Bosques #Deforestación #MINAE #País #REDD+ #SINAC #TalaIlegal #ÁreasProtegidas

    semanariouniversidad.com/pais/

  17. Disput um #CO2 -Zertifizierungen im #Nationalpark Cordillera Azul
    Die Ausstellung von Emissionsgutschriften ist fragwürdig. Warum, wird am Fall von #TotalEnergies deutlich. Auf Grund eines Projekts des französischen Energieunternehmens haben Kichwa-Gemeinden einen Teil ihres Territoriums verloren.
    Durch das internationale Wald-und Klimaschutzprogramm #REDD+ soll die #Abholzung von Wäldern begrenzt und die Wiederaufforstung gefördert werden. #Indigene #Peru
    infostelle-peru.de/indigene-un

  18. @konzeptlos wundert das jetzt irgendjemanden?
    #FSC ist auch nicht (mehr) das Papier (huch! ein Wortspiel!) wert, das dafür abgeholzt wurde.
    #VERRA ist da nicht anders.
    #REDD? Auch in den Negativ-Schlagzeilen.
    Vllt sollte sich „die Wirtschaft“ (im eigenen Interesse) doch dazu entschließen, auf #Ablasshandel zu verzichten. Aber man konnte sich halt hübsch lange zu günstigen Konditionen mit Zertifikaten eindecken und Kosten sparen. Warum jetzt damit aufhören?
    #klimakrise

  19. @konzeptlos wundert das jetzt irgendjemanden?
    #FSC ist auch nicht (mehr) das Papier (huch! ein Wortspiel!) wert, das dafür abgeholzt wurde.
    #VERRA ist da nicht anders.
    #REDD? Auch in den Negativ-Schlagzeilen.
    Vllt sollte sich „die Wirtschaft“ (im eigenen Interesse) doch dazu entschließen, auf #Ablasshandel zu verzichten. Aber man konnte sich halt hübsch lange zu günstigen Konditionen mit Zertifikaten eindecken und Kosten sparen. Warum jetzt damit aufhören?
    #klimakrise

  20. @konzeptlos wundert das jetzt irgendjemanden?
    #FSC ist auch nicht (mehr) das Papier (huch! ein Wortspiel!) wert, das dafür abgeholzt wurde.
    #VERRA ist da nicht anders.
    #REDD? Auch in den Negativ-Schlagzeilen.
    Vllt sollte sich „die Wirtschaft“ (im eigenen Interesse) doch dazu entschließen, auf #Ablasshandel zu verzichten. Aber man konnte sich halt hübsch lange zu günstigen Konditionen mit Zertifikaten eindecken und Kosten sparen. Warum jetzt damit aufhören?
    #klimakrise

  21. Este domingo 26 Avispa Mídia lanza el 1er episodio del podcast sobre "Crisis climática, falsas soluciones y alternativas"

    No te lo pierdas en 👉👉 avispa.org

    Difunde, comparte, platica y suma esfuerzos a construir posibles salidas
    #transiciónenergética #renovables #desarrollosostenible #crísisclimática #calentamientoglobal #calentamientoglobal🌎🔥 #ddhh #madretierra #redd #mineralescríticos #geopolítica #energia #pueblosindigenas #latinoamerica #americalatina

  22. Este Viernes estás invitado a la charla

    Resistencias a la expansión de la agroindustria en América Latina: Palma aceitera, el corredor mesoamericano y la Amazonía brasileña.

    #ExtracciónDeAceite #PalmaAfricana #Guatemala #Honduras #Brasil #México #PalmaAceitera #Indígenas #REDD

  23. Communities play a critical role in REDD+, a forest conservation strategy that aims to reduce emissions that can be sold as credits to raise money for forest protection.

    REDD+ projects often include components for the benefit of the communities, such as a focus on alternative livelihoods and provision of health care and education.

    By John Cannon
    news.mongabay.com/2024/01/do-c

    #News #Conservation #Environment #REDD #CarbonCredits #Forests

  24. "Peer-reviewed [research] shows unequivocally that many projects which have sold what are known as #REDD+ (reducing #emissions from deforestation and degradation) credits have failed to reduce#deforestation."

    #CarbonOffsets
    theconversation.com/worthless-