#monogamy — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #monogamy, aggregated by home.social.
-
Google will tell you monogamy offers emotional security and clear boundaries... What it won't mention is that no relationship model has ever successfully contained human desire, curiosity or the need to grow. I am not even starting on boundaries... #relationships #humannature #monogamy
-
Google will tell you monogamy offers emotional security and clear boundaries... What it won't mention is that no relationship model has ever successfully contained human desire, curiosity or the need to grow. I am not even starting on boundaries... #relationships #humannature #monogamy
-
You know, you don't have to fit your romantic relationships into specific traditional boxes if you don't want to. As long as what you're doing is healthy for you and any partner you're with, and you're both happy together, that's the important thing🥰
-
You know, you don't have to fit your romantic relationships into specific traditional boxes if you don't want to. As long as what you're doing is healthy for you and any partner you're with, and you're both happy together, that's the important thing🥰
-
You know, you don't have to fit your romantic relationships into specific traditional boxes if you don't want to. As long as what you're doing is healthy for you and any partner you're with, and you're both happy together, that's the important thing🥰
-
You know, you don't have to fit your romantic relationships into specific traditional boxes if you don't want to. As long as what you're doing is healthy for you and any partner you're with, and you're both happy together, that's the important thing🥰
-
DATE: July 27, 2026 at 04:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Men are more likely than women to view infidelity favorably when relationships falter
When adults feel unsatisfied with their romantic partnerships, they are more likely to develop a lenient attitude toward cheating. This psychological link is heavily influenced by a person’s baseline willingness to engage in casual sexual encounters. These findings were published recently in the journal Sexual and Relationship Therapy.
Romantic relationships require a continuous investment of time and emotional energy. Psychologists often use the investment model of commitment to understand why people stay faithful in a pairing. This model suggests that satisfaction, the sheer quality of the relationship, and the appeal of alternative partners all interact to determine a person’s loyalty.
Unmet needs in a primary relationship often push people to seek intimacy elsewhere. A lack of sexual or emotional satisfaction can weaken the boundaries that usually prevent extradyadic affairs. Still, not every unhappy partner inevitably embarks on an affair, prompting researchers to look for underlying personality traits that tip the scales.
Human beings possess varying levels of openness to uncommitted sexual intimacy. Psychologists refer to this trait as sociosexual orientation, a concept that helps explain vast differences in romantic behavior. People with an unrestricted orientation are highly comfortable with physical intimacy outside of a committed romantic bond. They do not feel an absolute need for love or emotional attachment to enjoy sexual encounters.
Conversely, those with a restricted sociosexual orientation typically require a deep emotional bond before engaging in physical intimacy. They prefer long term strategies and heavy emotional investment with a single partner. Sociosexuality is generally broken down into three distinct components in modern psychological assessments. These include past behavioral tendencies, personal attitudes about casual intimacy, and an ongoing psychological desire for uncommitted encounters.
In the contemporary dating landscape, maintaining loyalty can be uniquely challenging for some individuals. Dating apps and digital messaging platforms provide a constant stream of alternative options for dissatisfied partners. For those with unrestricted tendencies, this modern accessibility might make an unfaithful mindset even easier to adopt.
Past research connects unrestricted sexual orientations with an increased likelihood of cheating. Less understood is exactly how the daily fluctuations in a primary relationship interact with these personal dispositions to shape thoughts about unfaithfulness. Kashish Pandey, a researcher at the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, and colleagues wanted to map this specific psychological pathway.
Pandey, along with Priyanka Tiwari, Taranjeet Duggal, and Khusboo K from the Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, designed a survey to test these interactions. They wanted to see if a person’s baseline view on casual sex bridges the gap between a struggling relationship and a willingness to cheat. The team also examined whether gender changed these dynamics, given the different social pressures placed on men and women globally.
The researchers recruited 303 adult participants from the local region encompassing Delhi, India. The sample included 135 men and 168 women, with ages ranging from 18 to 65 years old. A vast majority of these individuals were young adults between the ages of 18 and 24.
The participants reported a wide variety of relationship statuses. Just over half of the respondents were currently dating someone. The rest were cohabiting with a partner, in a loosely defined casual arrangement, or engaging in relationships they simply defined as fluid.
To gather data safely and anonymously, the researchers used online assessment tools. Participants received digital links to a questionnaire designed to take less than ten minutes to complete. The first section utilized a widely used psychological survey called the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory. This test asks respondents to rate their agreement with statements regarding their sexual desires and past behaviors.
The surveying process also utilized a nine question assessment designed to capture relationship quality. This measure asks participants to evaluate their current happiness and satisfaction levels with their partners. Finally, the team administered the Attitude Towards Infidelity Scale to gauge how acceptable participants found cheating in various scenarios.
After running a statistical analysis on the survey results, the researchers noted a distinct pattern across the demographics. Lower relationship quality correlated with a much more positive attitude toward unfaithfulness. Participants unhappy with their current partners viewed outside intimacy as far more acceptable than those in thriving partnerships. This baseline finding matched expectations based on previous studies regarding marital dissatisfaction.
The analysis also showed that this was not a direct emotional jump from unhappiness to approving of affairs. Instead, a person’s sociosexual orientation acted as an intermediate variable. People in less fulfilling relationships were more likely to harbor unrestricted views on casual intimacy generally.
This general openness to uncommitted intimacy then predicted a more lenient attitude toward cheating specifically. The researchers refer to this psychological chain of events as a mediated pathway. Essentially, a poor relationship environment might activate or strengthen a person’s existing tendency toward unrestrictive intimacy.
This phenomenon aligns with a psychological concept known as self congruency theory. Socially unrestricted individuals often experience an increase in wellbeing after casual sexual encounters because the behavior matches their internal values. When a primary relationship fails to provide satisfaction, unrestricted individuals might organically lean toward thoughts that feel authentic to their personal dispositions.
Gender also altered the strength of this psychological pathway. The survey data indicated that men tended to have a higher baseline level of unrestricted sociosexuality than women. When relationship quality dropped, the men were more prone than the women to view outside sexual partners favorably.
The study authors contextualized this gender difference within the framework of evolutionary psychology. They referenced the sexual strategies theory, which proposes that male and female mating behaviors evolved under different reproductive pressures. According to this perspective, ancestral men gained a reproductive advantage by seeking multiple partners across a lifetime.
In contrast, ancestral women possessed a heavier biological burden of parental investment, leading to more selective mating strategies. Beyond evolutionary theory, the researchers also pointed to strictly sociological explanations. In many closed societies, men face a far less severe social stigma for promiscuity than women do.
Because women face higher physical and social risks associated with extramarital affairs, they might maintain less favorable attitudes toward cheating even when profoundly unhappy in a relationship. The authors noted a few methodological limitations in their current work. Because the study relied on observational data collected at a single point in time, the results cannot establish a strict cause and effect relationship.
It remains entirely possible that a naturally high interest in casual physical intimacy directly causes a decline in a couple’s happiness, rather than the other way around. To better understand this timeline, future scholars would need to follow couples over several years. Such a longitudinal approach could track how attitudes organically shift as relationships evolve and confront daily challenges.
The current measurements only reflect mental attitudes and self reported dispositions. Favorable thoughts about cheating do not always translate into actual acts of unfaithfulness. The jump from a passing thought to a physical affair involves many other behavioral hurdles. A partner might fantasize about alternative partners but never act on those thoughts due to personal morals or logistical barriers.
Looking forward, researchers could examine how other life variables influence the behavioral boundaries of fidelity. Incorporating metrics like religious beliefs, career stress, and overall mental health could provide a wider context for relationship struggles. Replicating the survey among older populations might also yield different findings, as an aging demographic often reports different long term motivations.
Understanding these psychological pathways can directly benefit modern therapeutic practices. Relationship counselors can use these insights to tailor their approach according to a client’s baseline sociosexual orientation. The findings highlight the absolute importance of emotional transparency and proactive problem solving within a romantic bond.
Addressing relationship deficits early on might prevent a partner from seeking external validation. Fostering open communication channels allows couples to handle dissatisfaction before it morphs into a favorable view of outside intimacy. This proactive approach ultimately helps protect both partners’ psychological wellbeing.
The study, “The entwined nature of infidelity and relationship quality: parallels in theory and practice through a moderated mediation analysis,” was authored by Kashish Pandey, Priyanka Tiwari, Taranjeet Duggal, and Khusboo K.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #infidelity #relationshipquality #sociosexualorientation #monogamy #datingresearch #genderdifferences #evolutionarypsychology #trustinrelationships #relationshiptherapy #unfaithfulnessattitudes
-
DATE: July 27, 2026 at 04:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Men are more likely than women to view infidelity favorably when relationships falter
When adults feel unsatisfied with their romantic partnerships, they are more likely to develop a lenient attitude toward cheating. This psychological link is heavily influenced by a person’s baseline willingness to engage in casual sexual encounters. These findings were published recently in the journal Sexual and Relationship Therapy.
Romantic relationships require a continuous investment of time and emotional energy. Psychologists often use the investment model of commitment to understand why people stay faithful in a pairing. This model suggests that satisfaction, the sheer quality of the relationship, and the appeal of alternative partners all interact to determine a person’s loyalty.
Unmet needs in a primary relationship often push people to seek intimacy elsewhere. A lack of sexual or emotional satisfaction can weaken the boundaries that usually prevent extradyadic affairs. Still, not every unhappy partner inevitably embarks on an affair, prompting researchers to look for underlying personality traits that tip the scales.
Human beings possess varying levels of openness to uncommitted sexual intimacy. Psychologists refer to this trait as sociosexual orientation, a concept that helps explain vast differences in romantic behavior. People with an unrestricted orientation are highly comfortable with physical intimacy outside of a committed romantic bond. They do not feel an absolute need for love or emotional attachment to enjoy sexual encounters.
Conversely, those with a restricted sociosexual orientation typically require a deep emotional bond before engaging in physical intimacy. They prefer long term strategies and heavy emotional investment with a single partner. Sociosexuality is generally broken down into three distinct components in modern psychological assessments. These include past behavioral tendencies, personal attitudes about casual intimacy, and an ongoing psychological desire for uncommitted encounters.
In the contemporary dating landscape, maintaining loyalty can be uniquely challenging for some individuals. Dating apps and digital messaging platforms provide a constant stream of alternative options for dissatisfied partners. For those with unrestricted tendencies, this modern accessibility might make an unfaithful mindset even easier to adopt.
Past research connects unrestricted sexual orientations with an increased likelihood of cheating. Less understood is exactly how the daily fluctuations in a primary relationship interact with these personal dispositions to shape thoughts about unfaithfulness. Kashish Pandey, a researcher at the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, and colleagues wanted to map this specific psychological pathway.
Pandey, along with Priyanka Tiwari, Taranjeet Duggal, and Khusboo K from the Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, designed a survey to test these interactions. They wanted to see if a person’s baseline view on casual sex bridges the gap between a struggling relationship and a willingness to cheat. The team also examined whether gender changed these dynamics, given the different social pressures placed on men and women globally.
The researchers recruited 303 adult participants from the local region encompassing Delhi, India. The sample included 135 men and 168 women, with ages ranging from 18 to 65 years old. A vast majority of these individuals were young adults between the ages of 18 and 24.
The participants reported a wide variety of relationship statuses. Just over half of the respondents were currently dating someone. The rest were cohabiting with a partner, in a loosely defined casual arrangement, or engaging in relationships they simply defined as fluid.
To gather data safely and anonymously, the researchers used online assessment tools. Participants received digital links to a questionnaire designed to take less than ten minutes to complete. The first section utilized a widely used psychological survey called the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory. This test asks respondents to rate their agreement with statements regarding their sexual desires and past behaviors.
The surveying process also utilized a nine question assessment designed to capture relationship quality. This measure asks participants to evaluate their current happiness and satisfaction levels with their partners. Finally, the team administered the Attitude Towards Infidelity Scale to gauge how acceptable participants found cheating in various scenarios.
After running a statistical analysis on the survey results, the researchers noted a distinct pattern across the demographics. Lower relationship quality correlated with a much more positive attitude toward unfaithfulness. Participants unhappy with their current partners viewed outside intimacy as far more acceptable than those in thriving partnerships. This baseline finding matched expectations based on previous studies regarding marital dissatisfaction.
The analysis also showed that this was not a direct emotional jump from unhappiness to approving of affairs. Instead, a person’s sociosexual orientation acted as an intermediate variable. People in less fulfilling relationships were more likely to harbor unrestricted views on casual intimacy generally.
This general openness to uncommitted intimacy then predicted a more lenient attitude toward cheating specifically. The researchers refer to this psychological chain of events as a mediated pathway. Essentially, a poor relationship environment might activate or strengthen a person’s existing tendency toward unrestrictive intimacy.
This phenomenon aligns with a psychological concept known as self congruency theory. Socially unrestricted individuals often experience an increase in wellbeing after casual sexual encounters because the behavior matches their internal values. When a primary relationship fails to provide satisfaction, unrestricted individuals might organically lean toward thoughts that feel authentic to their personal dispositions.
Gender also altered the strength of this psychological pathway. The survey data indicated that men tended to have a higher baseline level of unrestricted sociosexuality than women. When relationship quality dropped, the men were more prone than the women to view outside sexual partners favorably.
The study authors contextualized this gender difference within the framework of evolutionary psychology. They referenced the sexual strategies theory, which proposes that male and female mating behaviors evolved under different reproductive pressures. According to this perspective, ancestral men gained a reproductive advantage by seeking multiple partners across a lifetime.
In contrast, ancestral women possessed a heavier biological burden of parental investment, leading to more selective mating strategies. Beyond evolutionary theory, the researchers also pointed to strictly sociological explanations. In many closed societies, men face a far less severe social stigma for promiscuity than women do.
Because women face higher physical and social risks associated with extramarital affairs, they might maintain less favorable attitudes toward cheating even when profoundly unhappy in a relationship. The authors noted a few methodological limitations in their current work. Because the study relied on observational data collected at a single point in time, the results cannot establish a strict cause and effect relationship.
It remains entirely possible that a naturally high interest in casual physical intimacy directly causes a decline in a couple’s happiness, rather than the other way around. To better understand this timeline, future scholars would need to follow couples over several years. Such a longitudinal approach could track how attitudes organically shift as relationships evolve and confront daily challenges.
The current measurements only reflect mental attitudes and self reported dispositions. Favorable thoughts about cheating do not always translate into actual acts of unfaithfulness. The jump from a passing thought to a physical affair involves many other behavioral hurdles. A partner might fantasize about alternative partners but never act on those thoughts due to personal morals or logistical barriers.
Looking forward, researchers could examine how other life variables influence the behavioral boundaries of fidelity. Incorporating metrics like religious beliefs, career stress, and overall mental health could provide a wider context for relationship struggles. Replicating the survey among older populations might also yield different findings, as an aging demographic often reports different long term motivations.
Understanding these psychological pathways can directly benefit modern therapeutic practices. Relationship counselors can use these insights to tailor their approach according to a client’s baseline sociosexual orientation. The findings highlight the absolute importance of emotional transparency and proactive problem solving within a romantic bond.
Addressing relationship deficits early on might prevent a partner from seeking external validation. Fostering open communication channels allows couples to handle dissatisfaction before it morphs into a favorable view of outside intimacy. This proactive approach ultimately helps protect both partners’ psychological wellbeing.
The study, “The entwined nature of infidelity and relationship quality: parallels in theory and practice through a moderated mediation analysis,” was authored by Kashish Pandey, Priyanka Tiwari, Taranjeet Duggal, and Khusboo K.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #infidelity #relationshipquality #sociosexualorientation #monogamy #datingresearch #genderdifferences #evolutionarypsychology #trustinrelationships #relationshiptherapy #unfaithfulnessattitudes
-
DATE: July 27, 2026 at 04:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Men are more likely than women to view infidelity favorably when relationships falter
When adults feel unsatisfied with their romantic partnerships, they are more likely to develop a lenient attitude toward cheating. This psychological link is heavily influenced by a person’s baseline willingness to engage in casual sexual encounters. These findings were published recently in the journal Sexual and Relationship Therapy.
Romantic relationships require a continuous investment of time and emotional energy. Psychologists often use the investment model of commitment to understand why people stay faithful in a pairing. This model suggests that satisfaction, the sheer quality of the relationship, and the appeal of alternative partners all interact to determine a person’s loyalty.
Unmet needs in a primary relationship often push people to seek intimacy elsewhere. A lack of sexual or emotional satisfaction can weaken the boundaries that usually prevent extradyadic affairs. Still, not every unhappy partner inevitably embarks on an affair, prompting researchers to look for underlying personality traits that tip the scales.
Human beings possess varying levels of openness to uncommitted sexual intimacy. Psychologists refer to this trait as sociosexual orientation, a concept that helps explain vast differences in romantic behavior. People with an unrestricted orientation are highly comfortable with physical intimacy outside of a committed romantic bond. They do not feel an absolute need for love or emotional attachment to enjoy sexual encounters.
Conversely, those with a restricted sociosexual orientation typically require a deep emotional bond before engaging in physical intimacy. They prefer long term strategies and heavy emotional investment with a single partner. Sociosexuality is generally broken down into three distinct components in modern psychological assessments. These include past behavioral tendencies, personal attitudes about casual intimacy, and an ongoing psychological desire for uncommitted encounters.
In the contemporary dating landscape, maintaining loyalty can be uniquely challenging for some individuals. Dating apps and digital messaging platforms provide a constant stream of alternative options for dissatisfied partners. For those with unrestricted tendencies, this modern accessibility might make an unfaithful mindset even easier to adopt.
Past research connects unrestricted sexual orientations with an increased likelihood of cheating. Less understood is exactly how the daily fluctuations in a primary relationship interact with these personal dispositions to shape thoughts about unfaithfulness. Kashish Pandey, a researcher at the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, and colleagues wanted to map this specific psychological pathway.
Pandey, along with Priyanka Tiwari, Taranjeet Duggal, and Khusboo K from the Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, designed a survey to test these interactions. They wanted to see if a person’s baseline view on casual sex bridges the gap between a struggling relationship and a willingness to cheat. The team also examined whether gender changed these dynamics, given the different social pressures placed on men and women globally.
The researchers recruited 303 adult participants from the local region encompassing Delhi, India. The sample included 135 men and 168 women, with ages ranging from 18 to 65 years old. A vast majority of these individuals were young adults between the ages of 18 and 24.
The participants reported a wide variety of relationship statuses. Just over half of the respondents were currently dating someone. The rest were cohabiting with a partner, in a loosely defined casual arrangement, or engaging in relationships they simply defined as fluid.
To gather data safely and anonymously, the researchers used online assessment tools. Participants received digital links to a questionnaire designed to take less than ten minutes to complete. The first section utilized a widely used psychological survey called the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory. This test asks respondents to rate their agreement with statements regarding their sexual desires and past behaviors.
The surveying process also utilized a nine question assessment designed to capture relationship quality. This measure asks participants to evaluate their current happiness and satisfaction levels with their partners. Finally, the team administered the Attitude Towards Infidelity Scale to gauge how acceptable participants found cheating in various scenarios.
After running a statistical analysis on the survey results, the researchers noted a distinct pattern across the demographics. Lower relationship quality correlated with a much more positive attitude toward unfaithfulness. Participants unhappy with their current partners viewed outside intimacy as far more acceptable than those in thriving partnerships. This baseline finding matched expectations based on previous studies regarding marital dissatisfaction.
The analysis also showed that this was not a direct emotional jump from unhappiness to approving of affairs. Instead, a person’s sociosexual orientation acted as an intermediate variable. People in less fulfilling relationships were more likely to harbor unrestricted views on casual intimacy generally.
This general openness to uncommitted intimacy then predicted a more lenient attitude toward cheating specifically. The researchers refer to this psychological chain of events as a mediated pathway. Essentially, a poor relationship environment might activate or strengthen a person’s existing tendency toward unrestrictive intimacy.
This phenomenon aligns with a psychological concept known as self congruency theory. Socially unrestricted individuals often experience an increase in wellbeing after casual sexual encounters because the behavior matches their internal values. When a primary relationship fails to provide satisfaction, unrestricted individuals might organically lean toward thoughts that feel authentic to their personal dispositions.
Gender also altered the strength of this psychological pathway. The survey data indicated that men tended to have a higher baseline level of unrestricted sociosexuality than women. When relationship quality dropped, the men were more prone than the women to view outside sexual partners favorably.
The study authors contextualized this gender difference within the framework of evolutionary psychology. They referenced the sexual strategies theory, which proposes that male and female mating behaviors evolved under different reproductive pressures. According to this perspective, ancestral men gained a reproductive advantage by seeking multiple partners across a lifetime.
In contrast, ancestral women possessed a heavier biological burden of parental investment, leading to more selective mating strategies. Beyond evolutionary theory, the researchers also pointed to strictly sociological explanations. In many closed societies, men face a far less severe social stigma for promiscuity than women do.
Because women face higher physical and social risks associated with extramarital affairs, they might maintain less favorable attitudes toward cheating even when profoundly unhappy in a relationship. The authors noted a few methodological limitations in their current work. Because the study relied on observational data collected at a single point in time, the results cannot establish a strict cause and effect relationship.
It remains entirely possible that a naturally high interest in casual physical intimacy directly causes a decline in a couple’s happiness, rather than the other way around. To better understand this timeline, future scholars would need to follow couples over several years. Such a longitudinal approach could track how attitudes organically shift as relationships evolve and confront daily challenges.
The current measurements only reflect mental attitudes and self reported dispositions. Favorable thoughts about cheating do not always translate into actual acts of unfaithfulness. The jump from a passing thought to a physical affair involves many other behavioral hurdles. A partner might fantasize about alternative partners but never act on those thoughts due to personal morals or logistical barriers.
Looking forward, researchers could examine how other life variables influence the behavioral boundaries of fidelity. Incorporating metrics like religious beliefs, career stress, and overall mental health could provide a wider context for relationship struggles. Replicating the survey among older populations might also yield different findings, as an aging demographic often reports different long term motivations.
Understanding these psychological pathways can directly benefit modern therapeutic practices. Relationship counselors can use these insights to tailor their approach according to a client’s baseline sociosexual orientation. The findings highlight the absolute importance of emotional transparency and proactive problem solving within a romantic bond.
Addressing relationship deficits early on might prevent a partner from seeking external validation. Fostering open communication channels allows couples to handle dissatisfaction before it morphs into a favorable view of outside intimacy. This proactive approach ultimately helps protect both partners’ psychological wellbeing.
The study, “The entwined nature of infidelity and relationship quality: parallels in theory and practice through a moderated mediation analysis,” was authored by Kashish Pandey, Priyanka Tiwari, Taranjeet Duggal, and Khusboo K.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #infidelity #relationshipquality #sociosexualorientation #monogamy #datingresearch #genderdifferences #evolutionarypsychology #trustinrelationships #relationshiptherapy #unfaithfulnessattitudes
-
💁🏻♀️ TIL: 🐦💞 Most #birds practice social #monogamy, but only a few species actually mate for life.
Ornithologist Bart Kempenaers from the #MaxPlanck Institute explains that longevity, predation risk, and site fidelity all influence whether #animals stay partnered. Even lifelong animal pairs don’t always mate exclusively, with “cheating” and “divorce” playing a role.
👉 https://www.popsci.com/science/do-animals-mate-for-life/
#mating #wolves #science #biology #evolution #ornithology #nature #wildlife #swans #eagles #albatrosses #love
-
💁🏻♀️ TIL: 🐦💞 Most #birds practice social #monogamy, but only a few species actually mate for life.
Ornithologist Bart Kempenaers from the #MaxPlanck Institute explains that longevity, predation risk, and site fidelity all influence whether #animals stay partnered. Even lifelong animal pairs don’t always mate exclusively, with “cheating” and “divorce” playing a role.
👉 https://www.popsci.com/science/do-animals-mate-for-life/
#mating #wolves #science #biology #evolution #ornithology #nature #wildlife #swans #eagles #albatrosses #love
-
💁🏻♀️ TIL: 🐦💞 Most #birds practice social #monogamy, but only a few species actually mate for life.
Ornithologist Bart Kempenaers from the #MaxPlanck Institute explains that longevity, predation risk, and site fidelity all influence whether #animals stay partnered. Even lifelong animal pairs don’t always mate exclusively, with “cheating” and “divorce” playing a role.
👉 https://www.popsci.com/science/do-animals-mate-for-life/
#mating #wolves #science #biology #evolution #ornithology #nature #wildlife #swans #eagles #albatrosses #love
-
💁🏻♀️ TIL: 🐦💞 Most #birds practice social #monogamy, but only a few species actually mate for life.
Ornithologist Bart Kempenaers from the #MaxPlanck Institute explains that longevity, predation risk, and site fidelity all influence whether #animals stay partnered. Even lifelong animal pairs don’t always mate exclusively, with “cheating” and “divorce” playing a role.
👉 https://www.popsci.com/science/do-animals-mate-for-life/
#mating #wolves #science #biology #evolution #ornithology #nature #wildlife #swans #eagles #albatrosses #love
-
💁🏻♀️ TIL: 🐦💞 Most #birds practice social #monogamy, but only a few species actually mate for life.
Ornithologist Bart Kempenaers from the #MaxPlanck Institute explains that longevity, predation risk, and site fidelity all influence whether #animals stay partnered. Even lifelong animal pairs don’t always mate exclusively, with “cheating” and “divorce” playing a role.
👉 https://www.popsci.com/science/do-animals-mate-for-life/
#mating #wolves #science #biology #evolution #ornithology #nature #wildlife #swans #eagles #albatrosses #love
-
from @_glassmuseum on insta
#monogamy #mononormativity #nonmonogamy #relationshipanarchy -
Friday's fire take:
Monogamy is not the natural state of humans and defs not the natural state of hellions.
"But humans are naturally monogamous!"
U are not.
- U cheat like, a LOT.
- U divorce at crazy rates. Like up to 50% of first marriages and up to 70% of other ones.
- Even when u don't cheat, u often skirt the border of like... emotional cheating. Or u know, climb the fence and sneak into emotional cheating land lol.
Okie, some of u might be monogamous but I don't think its as common as u think. Ur obsession with it is bc even if u were never Abrahamic, u have been force fed their views. I think probs, u are not entirely mono, even if u do tje mono thing for short times."What about hellions?"
Pfft we are mostly like u. Including the dumb indoctrination.
"What about u?"
I'm non-mono but demi. So not mono but super picky.
-
Friday's fire take:
Monogamy is not the natural state of humans and defs not the natural state of hellions.
"But humans are naturally monogamous!"
U are not.
- U cheat like, a LOT.
- U divorce at crazy rates. Like up to 50% of first marriages and up to 70% of other ones.
- Even when u don't cheat, u often skirt the border of like... emotional cheating. Or u know, climb the fence and sneak into emotional cheating land lol.
Okie, some of u might be monogamous but I don't think its as common as u think. Ur obsession with it is bc even if u were never Abrahamic, u have been force fed their views. I think probs, u are not entirely mono, even if u do tje mono thing for short times."What about hellions?"
Pfft we are mostly like u. Including the dumb indoctrination.
"What about u?"
I'm non-mono but demi. So not mono but super picky.
-
Friday's fire take:
Monogamy is not the natural state of humans and defs not the natural state of hellions.
"But humans are naturally monogamous!"
U are not.
- U cheat like, a LOT.
- U divorce at crazy rates. Like up to 50% of first marriages and up to 70% of other ones.
- Even when u don't cheat, u often skirt the border of like... emotional cheating. Or u know, climb the fence and sneak into emotional cheating land lol.
Okie, some of u might be monogamous but I don't think its as common as u think. Ur obsession with it is bc even if u were never Abrahamic, u have been force fed their views. I think probs, u are not entirely mono, even if u do tje mono thing for short times."What about hellions?"
Pfft we are mostly like u. Including the dumb indoctrination.
"What about u?"
I'm non-mono but demi. So not mono but super picky.
-
Friday's fire take:
Monogamy is not the natural state of humans and defs not the natural state of hellions.
"But humans are naturally monogamous!"
U are not.
- U cheat like, a LOT.
- U divorce at crazy rates. Like up to 50% of first marriages and up to 70% of other ones.
- Even when u don't cheat, u often skirt the border of like... emotional cheating. Or u know, climb the fence and sneak into emotional cheating land lol.
Okie, some of u might be monogamous but I don't think its as common as u think. Ur obsession with it is bc even if u were never Abrahamic, u have been force fed their views. I think probs, u are not entirely mono, even if u do tje mono thing for short times."What about hellions?"
Pfft we are mostly like u. Including the dumb indoctrination.
"What about u?"
I'm non-mono but demi. So not mono but super picky.
-
Friday's fire take:
Monogamy is not the natural state of humans and defs not the natural state of hellions.
"But humans are naturally monogamous!"
U are not.
- U cheat like, a LOT.
- U divorce at crazy rates. Like up to 50% of first marriages and up to 70% of other ones.
- Even when u don't cheat, u often skirt the border of like... emotional cheating. Or u know, climb the fence and sneak into emotional cheating land lol.
Okie, some of u might be monogamous but I don't think its as common as u think. Ur obsession with it is bc even if u were never Abrahamic, u have been force fed their views. I think probs, u are not entirely mono, even if u do tje mono thing for short times."What about hellions?"
Pfft we are mostly like u. Including the dumb indoctrination.
"What about u?"
I'm non-mono but demi. So not mono but super picky.
-
I had sex with a girl in front of her long-term boyfriend — I did her a favour
-
Is #monogamy just a bad idea, forcing us to repress some of our most basic instincts? Or is it necessary for a functioning society and the rearing of well adjusted little humans? Would our #mentalhealth be better or worse if we embraced the alternatives? I guess it’s different for everyone. Personally, I don’t like sharing my partner with others, but I’m terribly promiscuous inside my own mind, so as a compromise I’m outwardly monogamous. Not very authentic.
#relationships #sex -
Do humans have a high capacity for commitment? One way to find out is to explore the default of nearly all of our romantic relationships: monogamy. Are we wired for it? Scientists have searched for the answer to this for decades. Here’s more from @sciencefocus:
-
Do humans have a high capacity for commitment? One way to find out is to explore the default of nearly all of our romantic relationships: monogamy. Are we wired for it? Scientists have searched for the answer to this for decades. Here’s more from @sciencefocus:
-
Do humans have a high capacity for commitment? One way to find out is to explore the default of nearly all of our romantic relationships: monogamy. Are we wired for it? Scientists have searched for the answer to this for decades. Here’s more from @sciencefocus:
-
Do humans have a high capacity for commitment? One way to find out is to explore the default of nearly all of our romantic relationships: monogamy. Are we wired for it? Scientists have searched for the answer to this for decades. Here’s more from @sciencefocus:
-
Do humans have a high capacity for commitment? One way to find out is to explore the default of nearly all of our romantic relationships: monogamy. Are we wired for it? Scientists have searched for the answer to this for decades. Here’s more from @sciencefocus:
-
monogamy is the way you organize, if you can't trust the rest of the world.
of course you can't create trust with the partner either but at least you are able to control one person better then many relationships.
monogamy looses it's purpose when humankind abolishes war. -
monogamy is the way you organize, if you can't trust the rest of the world.
of course you can't create trust with the partner either but at least you are able to control one person better then many relationships.
monogamy looses it's purpose when humankind abolishes war. -
Hey, if I (As a feminist.) go into a relationship with a sexist with the attempt in making them feminist that's fine, right?
Sure, they violate the rights of anyone who's not a man for fun, but I like them too much.
Hey, if I (As a vegan.) go into a relationship with a non-vegan with the attempt in making them vegan that's fine, right?
Sure, they violate the rights of non-human animals for fun, but I like them too much.
What do you mean that's not real love?
I understand the premise, but I don't get how you could go into a relationship with such people. You're already starting the relationship wrong. And you can like such a person enough to get into A RELATIONSHIP with them? Yuck. #Relationship #Relationships #Couple #Couples #Monogamy #Polygamy #Vegan -
Hey, if I (As a feminist.) go into a relationship with a sexist with the attempt in making them feminist that's fine, right?
Sure, they violate the rights of anyone who's not a man for fun, but I like them too much.
Hey, if I (As a vegan.) go into a relationship with a non-vegan with the attempt in making them vegan that's fine, right?
Sure, they violate the rights of non-human animals for fun, but I like them too much.
What do you mean that's not real love?
I understand the premise, but I don't get how you could go into a relationship with such people. You're already starting the relationship wrong. And you can like such a person enough to get into A RELATIONSHIP with them? Yuck. #Relationship #Relationships #Couple #Couples #Monogamy #Polygamy #Vegan -
Nice paper out in @PNASNews on the #evolution of #monogamy. It shows that monogamy worldwide mostly appeared as a result of competition for heritable wealth at the individual level, rather than as a way to promote cooperation at the group level.
-
Nice paper out in @PNASNews on the #evolution of #monogamy. It shows that monogamy worldwide mostly appeared as a result of competition for heritable wealth at the individual level, rather than as a way to promote cooperation at the group level.
-
You know what would probably blow the mind of your average monogamist? Asexual polyamory people. The next time someone finds out I'm poly and jumps right to talking about sex and threesomes, I'm going to bring up that counterexample and let them sit with what that says about their ideas of love and relationships.
#polyamory #lgbtqia #asexuality #ace #monogamy #ENM #ethicalNonmonogamy #poly #lgbtq #queer -
You know what would probably blow the mind of your average monogamist? Asexual polyamory people. The next time someone finds out I'm poly and jumps right to talking about sex and threesomes, I'm going to bring up that counterexample and let them sit with what that says about their ideas of love and relationships.
#polyamory #lgbtqia #asexuality #ace #monogamy #ENM #ethicalNonmonogamy #poly #lgbtq #queer -
You know what would probably blow the mind of your average monogamist? Asexual polyamory people. The next time someone finds out I'm poly and jumps right to talking about sex and threesomes, I'm going to bring up that counterexample and let them sit with what that says about their ideas of love and relationships.
#polyamory #lgbtqia #asexuality #ace #monogamy #ENM #ethicalNonmonogamy #poly #lgbtq #queer -
You know what would probably blow the mind of your average monogamist? Asexual polyamory people. The next time someone finds out I'm poly and jumps right to talking about sex and threesomes, I'm going to bring up that counterexample and let them sit with what that says about their ideas of love and relationships.
#polyamory #lgbtqia #asexuality #ace #monogamy #ENM #ethicalNonmonogamy #poly #lgbtq #queer -
You know what would probably blow the mind of your average monogamist? Asexual polyamory people. The next time someone finds out I'm poly and jumps right to talking about sex and threesomes, I'm going to bring up that counterexample and let them sit with what that says about their ideas of love and relationships.
#polyamory #lgbtqia #asexuality #ace #monogamy #ENM #ethicalNonmonogamy #poly #lgbtq #queer -
Just how monogamous are humans? Scientists break down how we compare with other animals | CNN
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/12/09/science/animal-monogamy-study-scli-intl
-
Just how monogamous are humans? Scientists break down how we compare with other animals | CNN
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/12/09/science/animal-monogamy-study-scli-intl
-
https://www.europesays.com/ie/227679/ The most monogamous animals – and where humans rank #DrDyble #DrMarkDyble #Éire #humans #IE #Ireland #MatingSystems #MonogamousMammals #monogamy #PremierLeague #Science #Wildlife
-
A scientist produced a monogamy ranking of dozens of mammals, including humans.
From @WSJ: "Humans are less monogamous than some mice but rank higher than one breed of sheep."
Gift link: https://flip.it/7nkbWY
-
A scientist produced a monogamy ranking of dozens of mammals, including humans.
From @WSJ: "Humans are less monogamous than some mice but rank higher than one breed of sheep."
Gift link: https://flip.it/7nkbWY
-
A scientist produced a monogamy ranking of dozens of mammals, including humans.
From @WSJ: "Humans are less monogamous than some mice but rank higher than one breed of sheep."
Gift link: https://flip.it/7nkbWY
-
A scientist produced a monogamy ranking of dozens of mammals, including humans.
From @WSJ: "Humans are less monogamous than some mice but rank higher than one breed of sheep."
Gift link: https://flip.it/7nkbWY
-
A scientist produced a monogamy ranking of dozens of mammals, including humans.
From @WSJ: "Humans are less monogamous than some mice but rank higher than one breed of sheep."
Gift link: https://flip.it/7nkbWY
-
Vatican defends monogamy against polygamy, polyamory
-
Vatican defends monogamy against polygamy, polyamory
-
Brand-new Pew Research poll shows ALARMING trend among high school senior girls
-
I had sex with a girl in front of her long-term boyfriend — I did her a favour
-
I got my boyfriend tickets to a swingers party for Christmas — it saved our relationship
-
Shameless #Sexuality: More than Monogamy Panel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GUc0r9urYc&list=WL
From #pansexuality to #polyamory, join us for a discussion that is guaranteed to be about More than #Monogamy, featuring:
Janice Selbie
Founder of CORT, Divorcing Religion Workshop, & Shameless Sexuality: Life After #Purity Culture, Divorcing #Religion
Keith Mullin
Mandisa Thomas
- Founder and President, Black Nonbelievers
Marie LePage
Sheldon and Katherine Roberts -
Shameless #Sexuality: More than Monogamy Panel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GUc0r9urYc&list=WL
From #pansexuality to #polyamory, join us for a discussion that is guaranteed to be about More than #Monogamy, featuring:
Janice Selbie
Founder of CORT, Divorcing Religion Workshop, & Shameless Sexuality: Life After #Purity Culture, Divorcing #Religion
Keith Mullin
Mandisa Thomas
- Founder and President, Black Nonbelievers
Marie LePage
Sheldon and Katherine Roberts -
Shameless #Sexuality: More than Monogamy Panel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GUc0r9urYc&list=WL
From #pansexuality to #polyamory, join us for a discussion that is guaranteed to be about More than #Monogamy, featuring:
Janice Selbie
Founder of CORT, Divorcing Religion Workshop, & Shameless Sexuality: Life After #Purity Culture, Divorcing #Religion
Keith Mullin
Mandisa Thomas
- Founder and President, Black Nonbelievers
Marie LePage
Sheldon and Katherine Roberts -
Shameless #Sexuality: More than Monogamy Panel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GUc0r9urYc&list=WL
From #pansexuality to #polyamory, join us for a discussion that is guaranteed to be about More than #Monogamy, featuring:
Janice Selbie
Founder of CORT, Divorcing Religion Workshop, & Shameless Sexuality: Life After #Purity Culture, Divorcing #Religion
Keith Mullin
Mandisa Thomas
- Founder and President, Black Nonbelievers
Marie LePage
Sheldon and Katherine Roberts -
Shameless #Sexuality: More than Monogamy Panel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GUc0r9urYc&list=WL
From #pansexuality to #polyamory, join us for a discussion that is guaranteed to be about More than #Monogamy, featuring:
Janice Selbie
Founder of CORT, Divorcing Religion Workshop, & Shameless Sexuality: Life After #Purity Culture, Divorcing #Religion
Keith Mullin
Mandisa Thomas
- Founder and President, Black Nonbelievers
Marie LePage
Sheldon and Katherine Roberts -
My first iOS app is finally available on the App Store! I am really excited about this and super hyped about everyone who gives it a try or shares it 🥰
Relationship Menu is an app that can help people to reflect on what they need and want in a relationship - alone or together with one or multiple partners.
Get it here: https://apps.apple.com/app/id6746169721
You can also use it on the web: https://relationshipmenu.org
#SwiftUI #Swift #iosdev #relationship #polyamory #monogamy #nonmonogamy #indiedev #ios26
-
My first iOS app is finally available on the App Store! I am really excited about this and super hyped about everyone who gives it a try or shares it 🥰
Relationship Menu is an app that can help people to reflect on what they need and want in a relationship - alone or together with one or multiple partners.
Get it here: https://apps.apple.com/app/id6746169721
You can also use it on the web: https://relationshipmenu.org
#SwiftUI #Swift #iosdev #relationship #polyamory #monogamy #nonmonogamy #indiedev #ios26
-
My first iOS app is finally available on the App Store! I am really excited about this and super hyped about everyone who gives it a try or shares it 🥰
Relationship Menu is an app that can help people to reflect on what they need and want in a relationship - alone or together with one or multiple partners.
Get it here: https://apps.apple.com/app/id6746169721
You can also use it on the web: https://relationshipmenu.org
#SwiftUI #Swift #iosdev #relationship #polyamory #monogamy #nonmonogamy #indiedev #ios26
-
My first iOS app is finally available on the App Store! I am really excited about this and super hyped about everyone who gives it a try or shares it 🥰
Relationship Menu is an app that can help people to reflect on what they need and want in a relationship - alone or together with one or multiple partners.
Get it here: https://apps.apple.com/app/id6746169721
You can also use it on the web: https://relationshipmenu.org
#SwiftUI #Swift #iosdev #relationship #polyamory #monogamy #nonmonogamy #indiedev #ios26