#stackexchange — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #stackexchange, aggregated by home.social.
-
Ah, the age-old existential crisis: what *is* a mathematician supposed to do? 🤔 Apparently, hang out on #MathOverflow, the place where number nerds unite to swap proofs and procrastinate on real problems. Who knew infinite wisdom could be found in a 183-site rabbit hole of Stack Exchange? 🙄🔢
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/43690/whats-a-mathematician-to-do #mathematics #existentialcrisis #StackExchange #numbernerds #HackerNews #ngated -
Ah, the age-old existential crisis: what *is* a mathematician supposed to do? 🤔 Apparently, hang out on #MathOverflow, the place where number nerds unite to swap proofs and procrastinate on real problems. Who knew infinite wisdom could be found in a 183-site rabbit hole of Stack Exchange? 🙄🔢
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/43690/whats-a-mathematician-to-do #mathematics #existentialcrisis #StackExchange #numbernerds #HackerNews #ngated -
Ah, the age-old existential crisis: what *is* a mathematician supposed to do? 🤔 Apparently, hang out on #MathOverflow, the place where number nerds unite to swap proofs and procrastinate on real problems. Who knew infinite wisdom could be found in a 183-site rabbit hole of Stack Exchange? 🙄🔢
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/43690/whats-a-mathematician-to-do #mathematics #existentialcrisis #StackExchange #numbernerds #HackerNews #ngated -
Ah, the age-old existential crisis: what *is* a mathematician supposed to do? 🤔 Apparently, hang out on #MathOverflow, the place where number nerds unite to swap proofs and procrastinate on real problems. Who knew infinite wisdom could be found in a 183-site rabbit hole of Stack Exchange? 🙄🔢
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/43690/whats-a-mathematician-to-do #mathematics #existentialcrisis #StackExchange #numbernerds #HackerNews #ngated -
Ah, the age-old existential crisis: what *is* a mathematician supposed to do? 🤔 Apparently, hang out on #MathOverflow, the place where number nerds unite to swap proofs and procrastinate on real problems. Who knew infinite wisdom could be found in a 183-site rabbit hole of Stack Exchange? 🙄🔢
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/43690/whats-a-mathematician-to-do #mathematics #existentialcrisis #StackExchange #numbernerds #HackerNews #ngated -
A nice article on how to ask good #forum questions.
-
Just donated to @kiwix!
They do great work of making the download of various dictionaries and knowledgebases offline extremely easy!
This is essential for people in regions with bad internet, like a refugee camp.
I couldn't find any legal advice, which would be pretty important, apart from a general #StackExchange backup.
Spread the knowledge!
-
Fuck me, the Stack Overflow beta is *horrible*.
Question pages look like a bastard mix between Reddit and ChatGPT.
The answer text area is auto-focussed and hijacking browser shortcuts.
There is no visible separation between question and answers.
https://beta.stackoverflow.com/questions
#stackoverflow #stackexchange #softwaredevelopers #softwaredevelopment
-
Fuck me, the Stack Overflow beta is *horrible*.
Question pages look like a bastard mix between Reddit and ChatGPT.
The answer text area is auto-focussed and hijacking browser shortcuts.
There is no visible separation between question and answers.
https://beta.stackoverflow.com/questions
#stackoverflow #stackexchange #softwaredevelopers #softwaredevelopment
-
Fuck me, the Stack Overflow beta is *horrible*.
Question pages look like a bastard mix between Reddit and ChatGPT.
The answer text area is auto-focussed and hijacking browser shortcuts.
There is no visible separation between question and answers.
https://beta.stackoverflow.com/questions
#stackoverflow #stackexchange #softwaredevelopers #softwaredevelopment
-
Fuck me, the Stack Overflow beta is *horrible*.
Question pages look like a bastard mix between Reddit and ChatGPT.
The answer text area is auto-focussed and hijacking browser shortcuts.
There is no visible separation between question and answers.
https://beta.stackoverflow.com/questions
#stackoverflow #stackexchange #softwaredevelopers #softwaredevelopment
-
A fucking Tragedy
Undeniably, Undebatably.
Environmentally? Tragedy.
Cost? Tragedy.
Just everything here is a Tragedy.If you are able to run on your own hardware, fucking do it, there's no excuse to go cloud, especially if you already have the infra, even if you need to physically move it.
For fuck sakes.
Throwing away On-Prem or at least Self-Hosted is throwing away the Sovereignty of your Business, of your Data. You've just given all of your customer and business Data to Google. Good Job.
-
StackOverflow 的每月發問數量已經降到開站第一個月的等級了
-
Wenn ich nachsehen möchte, ob im #Formatstring für das Datum das kleine s für Sekunden und das große S für Millisekunden steht, dann frage ich das einen beliebigen #GPTbot (den, der nicht sagt #Quota exceded, weil ich mich nicht per #Api-Key identifiziert habe). Warum?In #Wikipedia steht die Antwort möglicherweise. Es dauert aber, herauszufinden, in welchem Artikel, Listenartikel oder Unterartikel. Die #Suche von Wikipedia verwendet zwar #ElasticSearch, aber um die Vorteile von dieser starken Engine auch zu erhalten, hätten 100000e Menschen, die Wikipedia-Artikel auch verschlagworten müssen (#wikidata). Ausserdem kann es sein, dass etwas so praktisches wie formatstrings als #unenzyklpädisch eingestuft wurde und daher entfernt.
In #Stackexchange muss ich mehrfach bestätigen, dass ich ein Mensch bin, finde dann einen Artikel, der unbeantwortet geschlossen wurde, weil #Duplikat. Dann zwei veraltete, die inzwischen falsch sind, dann welche mit einem nicht mehr funktionierenden link auf die Lösung.
Bei #archive_org, archive.is und #AnnasArchive muss ich die #URL des gesuchten Artikels wissen, um suchen zu können.
Eine #Suchmaschine sucht nicht. Eine Suchmaschine liest die "Sutemap.XML" Dateien aus, die websitebetreiber online stellen für die #crawler der Suchmaschinen. Ich finde also fünf Jahre alte Artikel auf Websites die seit fünf Jahren nicht mehr gepflegt werden. Und maximal ein jahr alte Artikel, die meine Frage nicht beantworten aber in der #sitemap stehen. Die 100 Websites, die die richtige Antwort in einem zwei bis vier Jahre alte Artikel enthalten, finde ich nicht, weil diese Artikel nicht mehr in der sitemap stehen.
Die GPTbots haben Wikipedia, stackexchange, Archiv.org, Annas archive und alle Websites gescrapt und dabei #robots.txt und sitemap ignoriert. Ich bekomme die richtige Antwort und zwar schneller als mit allen zuvor genannten Varianten.
Oder ich suche in #Grokipedia. Grokipedia besteht aus 1Million statischen seiten im #CDN von #Cloudflare die von wikipedia gescrapt wurden. Die suche ist ein GPTbot und 57mal besser als die suche in wikipedia.
@malteengeler @awinkler @evawolfangel @bkastl @Raymond @wikipedia
-
这个浏览器扩展让你只搜索 AI 出现之前的互联网内容
#chatgpt 3 年前上线之后直到现在，互联网充斥了很多 AI 生成的垃圾内容，以至于你现在用 #google 搜索，很大可能搜到的都是 AI 生成的内容。
这个浏览器扩展可以让谷歌的搜索结果只返回 2022年 11 月 30 号之前的内容 （2022 年 12 月 1 号 ChatGPT 上线）
我试了一下，用这个扩展搜索 how to install java （P1），和不用扩展直接搜索的结果 （P2)
这个扩展(P3)如今支持如下搜索引擎：
#google
#duckduckgo
#reddit
#quora
#stackexchange
#pinterest
#youtube你需要手动在这个扩展里搜索才生效。
-
🎩🤹♂️ Behold! The grand revelation that math wizards are secretly one-trick ponies! Who knew that amidst 183 Stack Exchange communities, the real magic was in recycling the same old tricks? 🧙♂️✨ Let’s all pretend to be shocked as the mathematical curtain is pulled back! 🚪🎭
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/363119/every-mathematician-has-only-a-few-tricks #mathmagic #one-trickponies #StackExchange #communityrevelation #mathwizards #secretsrevealed #HackerNews #ngated -
🚀 Oh wow, riveting stuff! Turns out, ejecting pilots don't leave planes to just ✈️ wander off into the sunset. Who knew? 🙄 Let's all gather 'round the Stack Exchange #campfire and pretend this was a mystery we desperately needed solved. 🎪
https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/52862/if-a-pilot-ejects-what-is-the-autopilot-programmed-to-do #ejectingpilots #aviationmystery #StackExchange #humor #aviationnews #HackerNews #ngated -
@BenjaminHCCarr Good news! It’s good to hear that the oppressive technofeudal gate keeper (#StackExchange/ #StackOverflow) might stop jailing knowledge in #Cloudflare’s #walledGarden.
Note that they have taken a jab at #AnonymousOverflow in the past week:
-
@elementary tl;dr I support your objectives, and kudos on the goal, but I think you should monitor this new policy for unexpected negative outcomes. I take about 9k characters to explain why, but I’m not criticizing your intent.
While I am much more pragmatic about my stance on #aicoding this was previously a long-running issue of contention on the #StackExchange network that was never really effectively resolved outside of a few clearly egregious cases.
The triple-net is that when it comes to certain parts of software—think of the SCO copyright trials over header files from a few decades back—in many cases, obvious code will be, well…obvious. That “the simplest thing that could possibly work” was produced by an AI instead of a person is difficult to prove using existing tools, and false accusations of plagiarism have been a huge problem that has caused a number of people real #reputationalharm over the last couple of years.
That said, I don’t disagree with the stance that #vibecoding is not worth the pixels that it takes up on a screen. From a more pragmatic standpoint, though, it may be more useful to address the underlying principle that #plagiarism is unacceptable from a community standards or copyright perspective rather than making it a tool-specific policy issue.
I’m a firm believer that people have the right to run their community projects in whatever way best serves their community members. I’m only pointing out the pragmatic issues of setting forth a policy where the likelihood of false positives is quite high, and the level of pragmatic enforceability may be quite low. That is something that could lead to reputational harm to people and the project, or to community in-fighting down the road, when the real policy you’re promoting (as I understand it) is just a fundamental expectation of “original human contributions” to the project.
Because I work in #riskmanagement and #cybersecurity I see this a lot. This is an issue that comes up more often than you might think. Again, I fully support your objectives, but just wanted to offer an alternative viewpoint that your project might want to revisit down the road if the current policy doesn’t achieve the results that you’re hoping for.
In the meantime, I certainly wish you every possible success! You’re taking a #thoughtleadership stance on an important #AIgovernance policy issue that is important to society and to #FOSS right now. I think that’s terrific!
-
@elementary tl;dr I support your objectives, and kudos on the goal, but I think you should monitor this new policy for unexpected negative outcomes. I take about 9k characters to explain why, but I’m not criticizing your intent.
While I am much more pragmatic about my stance on #aicoding this was previously a long-running issue of contention on the #StackExchange network that was never really effectively resolved outside of a few clearly egregious cases.
The triple-net is that when it comes to certain parts of software—think of the SCO copyright trials over header files from a few decades back—in many cases, obvious code will be, well…obvious. That “the simplest thing that could possibly work” was produced by an AI instead of a person is difficult to prove using existing tools, and false accusations of plagiarism have been a huge problem that has caused a number of people real #reputationalharm over the last couple of years.
That said, I don’t disagree with the stance that #vibecoding is not worth the pixels that it takes up on a screen. From a more pragmatic standpoint, though, it may be more useful to address the underlying principle that #plagiarism is unacceptable from a community standards or copyright perspective rather than making it a tool-specific policy issue.
I’m a firm believer that people have the right to run their community projects in whatever way best serves their community members. I’m only pointing out the pragmatic issues of setting forth a policy where the likelihood of false positives is quite high, and the level of pragmatic enforceability may be quite low. That is something that could lead to reputational harm to people and the project, or to community in-fighting down the road, when the real policy you’re promoting (as I understand it) is just a fundamental expectation of “original human contributions” to the project.
Because I work in #riskmanagement and #cybersecurity I see this a lot. This is an issue that comes up more often than you might think. Again, I fully support your objectives, but just wanted to offer an alternative viewpoint that your project might want to revisit down the road if the current policy doesn’t achieve the results that you’re hoping for.
In the meantime, I certainly wish you every possible success! You’re taking a #thoughtleadership stance on an important #AIgovernance policy issue that is important to society and to #FOSS right now. I think that’s terrific!
-
@elementary tl;dr I support your objectives, and kudos on the goal, but I think you should monitor this new policy for unexpected negative outcomes. I take about 9k characters to explain why, but I’m not criticizing your intent.
While I am much more pragmatic about my stance on #aicoding this was previously a long-running issue of contention on the #StackExchange network that was never really effectively resolved outside of a few clearly egregious cases.
The triple-net is that when it comes to certain parts of software—think of the SCO copyright trials over header files from a few decades back—in many cases, obvious code will be, well…obvious. That “the simplest thing that could possibly work” was produced by an AI instead of a person is difficult to prove using existing tools, and false accusations of plagiarism have been a huge problem that has caused a number of people real #reputationalharm over the last couple of years.
That said, I don’t disagree with the stance that #vibecoding is not worth the pixels that it takes up on a screen. From a more pragmatic standpoint, though, it may be more useful to address the underlying principle that #plagiarism is unacceptable from a community standards or copyright perspective rather than making it a tool-specific policy issue.
I’m a firm believer that people have the right to run their community projects in whatever way best serves their community members. I’m only pointing out the pragmatic issues of setting forth a policy where the likelihood of false positives is quite high, and the level of pragmatic enforceability may be quite low. That is something that could lead to reputational harm to people and the project, or to community in-fighting down the road, when the real policy you’re promoting (as I understand it) is just a fundamental expectation of “original human contributions” to the project.
Because I work in #riskmanagement and #cybersecurity I see this a lot. This is an issue that comes up more often than you might think. Again, I fully support your objectives, but just wanted to offer an alternative viewpoint that your project might want to revisit down the road if the current policy doesn’t achieve the results that you’re hoping for.
In the meantime, I certainly wish you every possible success! You’re taking a #thoughtleadership stance on an important #AIgovernance policy issue that is important to society and to #FOSS right now. I think that’s terrific!
-
@elementary tl;dr I support your objectives, and kudos on the goal, but I think you should monitor this new policy for unexpected negative outcomes. I take about 9k characters to explain why, but I’m not criticizing your intent.
While I am much more pragmatic about my stance on #aicoding this was previously a long-running issue of contention on the #StackExchange network that was never really effectively resolved outside of a few clearly egregious cases.
The triple-net is that when it comes to certain parts of software—think of the SCO copyright trials over header files from a few decades back—in many cases, obvious code will be, well…obvious. That “the simplest thing that could possibly work” was produced by an AI instead of a person is difficult to prove using existing tools, and false accusations of plagiarism have been a huge problem that has caused a number of people real #reputationalharm over the last couple of years.
That said, I don’t disagree with the stance that #vibecoding is not worth the pixels that it takes up on a screen. From a more pragmatic standpoint, though, it may be more useful to address the underlying principle that #plagiarism is unacceptable from a community standards or copyright perspective rather than making it a tool-specific policy issue.
I’m a firm believer that people have the right to run their community projects in whatever way best serves their community members. I’m only pointing out the pragmatic issues of setting forth a policy where the likelihood of false positives is quite high, and the level of pragmatic enforceability may be quite low. That is something that could lead to reputational harm to people and the project, or to community in-fighting down the road, when the real policy you’re promoting (as I understand it) is just a fundamental expectation of “original human contributions” to the project.
Because I work in #riskmanagement and #cybersecurity I see this a lot. This is an issue that comes up more often than you might think. Again, I fully support your objectives, but just wanted to offer an alternative viewpoint that your project might want to revisit down the road if the current policy doesn’t achieve the results that you’re hoping for.
In the meantime, I certainly wish you every possible success! You’re taking a #thoughtleadership stance on an important #AIgovernance policy issue that is important to society and to #FOSS right now. I think that’s terrific!
-
@elementary tl;dr I support your objectives, and kudos on the goal, but I think you should monitor this new policy for unexpected negative outcomes. I take about 9k characters to explain why, but I’m not criticizing your intent.
While I am much more pragmatic about my stance on #aicoding this was previously a long-running issue of contention on the #StackExchange network that was never really effectively resolved outside of a few clearly egregious cases.
The triple-net is that when it comes to certain parts of software—think of the SCO copyright trials over header files from a few decades back—in many cases, obvious code will be, well…obvious. That “the simplest thing that could possibly work” was produced by an AI instead of a person is difficult to prove using existing tools, and false accusations of plagiarism have been a huge problem that has caused a number of people real #reputationalharm over the last couple of years.
That said, I don’t disagree with the stance that #vibecoding is not worth the pixels that it takes up on a screen. From a more pragmatic standpoint, though, it may be more useful to address the underlying principle that #plagiarism is unacceptable from a community standards or copyright perspective rather than making it a tool-specific policy issue.
I’m a firm believer that people have the right to run their community projects in whatever way best serves their community members. I’m only pointing out the pragmatic issues of setting forth a policy where the likelihood of false positives is quite high, and the level of pragmatic enforceability may be quite low. That is something that could lead to reputational harm to people and the project, or to community in-fighting down the road, when the real policy you’re promoting (as I understand it) is just a fundamental expectation of “original human contributions” to the project.
Because I work in #riskmanagement and #cybersecurity I see this a lot. This is an issue that comes up more often than you might think. Again, I fully support your objectives, but just wanted to offer an alternative viewpoint that your project might want to revisit down the road if the current policy doesn’t achieve the results that you’re hoping for.
In the meantime, I certainly wish you every possible success! You’re taking a #thoughtleadership stance on an important #AIgovernance policy issue that is important to society and to #FOSS right now. I think that’s terrific!
-
I got an email from "[email protected]" about a Stack Overflow survey. Most of my participation on the Stack Exchange network is actually on SuperUser, but I figured my contributions might still be useful/relevant. I imagine the populations between the two are pretty similar. They were looking for users from the United States.
Info Sheet: http://tiny.cc/Sheet1233
The Actual Survey: http://tiny.cc/Survey1233
I got nerd-sniped hard by what I considered to be (mostly) excellent questions surrounding DEI-type concerns. I ended up spending way longer than 15-30 minutes on them anyway. So... I'm dumping my responses here in a thread before going to bed for the night.
-
Just learnt that there's an open source alternative to Stack Exchange called Codidact: https://codidact.org. Of course, it also has a StackOverflow-style software Q&A: https://software.codidact.com. No idea if it's any good given that a website like this really only is as useful as its community, but I've always felt a bit icky contributing to a proprietary forum like Stack Exchange, so it's certainly interesting.
-
Stack Overflow users sabotage their posts after OpenAI deal - Enlarge (credit: Getty Images)
On Monday, Stack Overflow and O... - https://arstechnica.com/?p=2022923 #largelanguagemodels #machinelearning #stackexchange #stackoverflow #overflowapi #moderation #overflowai #aiprotest #sabotage #chatgpt #chatgtp #biz #openai #api #ai
-
@dw_innovation
It’s great to have another badly needed search alternative like #Stract. One unique feature is ability to thumbs up/down results. But what does a thumbs down actually do?I give a thumbs down to #stackexchange hits because they are in the #Cloudflare walled garden. They get removed from my result list, but what else? I was hoping it would send a signal to Stract.
StackExchange links should be replaced with #AnonymousOverflow links.
-
Does anyone know of well-maintained or slightly out-of-date TXT or html dataDump of wikipedia, stackExchange or stackoverflow? I love to browse offline, but kiwix is not accessible with screen readers last I checked.
#accessibility #a11y #disability #blind #dataDump #wikipedia #stackExchange #stackoverflow #wikipedian #dataHoarder #archive #kiwix #dump #offline #archiveOrg #internet #zip #links -
Indeed mojeek.com is not the only non-tech-giant #searchEngine (+crawler). From strypey’s mentions + some of my notes:
* #Mojeek ← does their own crawling
* #Metager.org ← does their own crawling
* #SearchMySite.net ← avoid (Cloudflare)
* #Searx ← just proxy software, many instances
* #4get ← another proxy software, about a dozen instances: https://4get.ca/instances
* #Gigablast ← does their own crawling, but what happened?.. they were dissolved last year & seem to now be www.alltheinternet.com
* #Ombrelo ← a proxy but more advanced than the others (filters/downranks Cloudflare sites)#YaCy is notable because it’s a crawler that you can install and operate yourself. YaCy instances can be public-facing and they can also share indexes with each other fedi style apparently. Some Searx instances tap YaCy instances.
I would love to find a searx or 4get instance that rejects the tech giants, but aggregates from YaCy, mojeek, gigablast, metager, maginalia.nu, frogfind.com, & wiby.me.
And I would love it even more if it would make replacements:
* #StackExchange → #AnonymousOverflow
* #YouTube → #Invideous
* #Medium.com → scribe.rip
* #BBC → BBC’s onion site
* #NYTimes → New York Times’s onion site
* etc.search.fabiomanganiello.com makes some of those replacements.
-
@pglpm There is an alternative front-end to escape #StackExchange called #AnonymousOverflow which liberates the content from the #walledGarden. But it would be an improvement to have an option that gets the content completely out of that jail, and indeed a federated mechanism could theoretically help add redundency & share the hosting costs. /cc @dekkzz76
-
I would like to thank #TechPowerup who answered how the iGPU of the Ryzen 9 compares to a similarly prized NVidia card. They provided an answer unlike
the moderator of #StackExchange who simply closed the question. If you have a technical question ask other sites before wasting your time being looked down by the gods at #stackexchange. -
@blacklight I noticed your search engine is sending users directly to #stackexchange, which should be avoided if possible. Is it trivial to add URL replacements like #AnonymousOverflow to your #searx configuration or does it require forking the code?
-
I just discovered #StackExchange was previously #Cloudflare-jailed in 2016¹. So SE evolved to wisely ditch CF for a number of years then in the past month or so regressed back into foolish exclusive greed.
The fix for people living in the free world is #AnonymousOverflow:
-
@volkris @pglpm It would be very useful if a bot would harvest all “askFedi” hashtagged status into an organized DB that could replace #stackExchange. But it’d be quite ambitious.
If you want to liberated #deshitified access to SE, have a look at #anonymousOverflow:
-
@kevinbowen Now there is a front-end that helps us escape the #Stackexchange jail:
-
STACK OVER'THROW'
Similar to #youtube_dl we need sites just for mirroring #stackOverflow sites.
Now that #CloudGlare have hijacked #serverFault, unix, #stackExchange, #askUbuntu and the entire StackOverflow family of sites, CloudGlare are more able to learn the types of work people might be doing.
Just more anti-competitive #monopolisation of the dumpster fire we can #theInternet.
We can't bomb CloudGlare datacenters, so a distributed #selfHealing system is needed.
-
Now, the entire #stackExchange family of sites is #cloudGlare . That means #askubuntu, unix.stackexchange, and many more.
There are things we are going to miss about #theInternet when the time comes.
#applianceSaysNo #computerSaysNo #technoFeudalism #blockCAGEMAFIANow #cageMafia
-
@smallcircles
Codidact is not a good alternative to stackexchange. It’s privacy-hostile & jailed in #Cloudlfare’s walled garden.We do need a good #stackexchange alternative but #Codidact is not it.
-
Today has been learning how to use #OverpassAPI to return a list of coffee shops. Despite the steep learning curve, I've figured it out thanks to this #StackExchange 🧵 https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/292163/how-to-query-overpass-api-with-postman
-
And there's even an open meta-discussion about whether they should add #ActivityPub support! Love it!
-
Just found out about #codidact - a "community-run, open-source Q&A platform", aka #StackExchange's replacement! What an exciting time to be alive!
-
Welp. After some time spent reading up on the issue, I've signed up for the moderator strike on #StackExchange #AskUbuntu
Now, to try and decide what, if anything, to do with r/xfce on #reddit as other folks use it. #xfce
I'm open to input/feedback. -
📬 Tor Browser: unbedingt updaten wegen kritischer Sicherheitslücken #Datenschutz #paysafecard #StackExchange #TorBrowser #TorProjectInc https://tarnkappe.info/artikel/datenschutz/tor-browser-unbedingt-updaten-wegen-kritischer-sicherheitsluecken-213449.html
-
📬 Tor Browser: unbedingt updaten wegen kritischer Sicherheitslücken #Datenschutz #paysafecard #StackExchange #TorBrowser #TorProjectInc https://tarnkappe.info/artikel/datenschutz/tor-browser-unbedingt-updaten-wegen-kritischer-sicherheitsluecken-213449.html
-
Stack Overflow sold to tech investor Prosus for $1.8 billion - Enlarge / If you've ever gone looking for answers to software development questio... - https://arstechnica.com/?p=1769534 #stackexchange #stackoverflow #codinghorror #naspers #prosus #tech
