#aigovernance — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #aigovernance, aggregated by home.social.
-
AI Governance Trails AI Adoption
The harsh reality is that most organizations are playing catch-up with their AI usage, with fewer than one in three having achieved operational maturity in AI governance, despite nearly half already deploying autonomous AI agents in production. This reveals a significant gap between confidence and capability in managing AI…
https://osintsights.com/ai-governance-trails-ai-adoption?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social
#AiGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #OperationalMaturity #AiAdoption #EmergingThreatsIsNotSuitableHere
-
Organisations rarely lack knowledge. They lack a reliable way to find and use it.
Could one secure corporate AI assistant connect documents, systems, processes and expertise across the enterprise?
https://medium.com/@chribonn/the-organisation-that-knows-what-it-knows-9ef1636c94fa
#EnterpriseAI #AIGovernance #TTMO #Medium #KnowledgeManagement #RAG
-
The Tech Coup Playbook.
"clear conflict of interest”
https://theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/07/architect-uk-ai-policy-quits-anthropic-conflict-of-interest-concerns #AIPolicy #AIGovernance #DigitalPolicy #TechRegulation #AIRegulation #PublicInterestTech #UKTechPolicy -
Welcome to RC Trust, Agathe Balayn!
As part of Jat Singh’s Compliant and Accountable Systems group, she studies how AI systems are built, evaluated, and governed in practice – from AI supply chains and evaluation routines to questions of trustworthy AI, policy, fairness, and transparency.
https://rc-trust.ai/news/news-detail/studying-ai-in-practice
#RCTrust #TrustworthyAI #AIGovernance #HCI -
The UN Human Rights Chief has warned that a small group of men have almost unlimited power over AI development, describing the concentration of AI power as a grave concern. He also cautioned that advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity, calling for greater oversight of the tech industry. https://gizmodo.com/un-human-rights-chief-says-a-handful-of-men-have-almost-unlimited-power-over-ai-2000808248 #AIagent #AI #GenAI #AIgovernance
-
The UN Human Rights Chief has warned that a small group of men have almost unlimited power over AI development, describing the concentration of AI power as a grave concern. He also cautioned that advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity, calling for greater oversight of the tech industry. https://gizmodo.com/un-human-rights-chief-says-a-handful-of-men-have-almost-unlimited-power-over-ai-2000808248 #AIagent #AI #GenAI #AIgovernance
-
The UN Human Rights Chief has warned that a small group of men have almost unlimited power over AI development, describing the concentration of AI power as a grave concern. He also cautioned that advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity, calling for greater oversight of the tech industry. https://gizmodo.com/un-human-rights-chief-says-a-handful-of-men-have-almost-unlimited-power-over-ai-2000808248 #AIagent #AI #GenAI #AIgovernance
-
The UN Human Rights Chief has warned that a small group of men have almost unlimited power over AI development, describing the concentration of AI power as a grave concern. He also cautioned that advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity, calling for greater oversight of the tech industry. https://gizmodo.com/un-human-rights-chief-says-a-handful-of-men-have-almost-unlimited-power-over-ai-2000808248 #AIagent #AI #GenAI #AIgovernance
-
The UN Human Rights Chief has warned that a small group of men have almost unlimited power over AI development, describing the concentration of AI power as a grave concern. He also cautioned that advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity, calling for greater oversight of the tech industry. https://gizmodo.com/un-human-rights-chief-says-a-handful-of-men-have-almost-unlimited-power-over-ai-2000808248 #AIagent #AI #GenAI #AIgovernance
-
https://www.europesays.com/people/?p=218338 When Tech Idealism Becomes Overreach: The AI Governance Challenge #AIGovernance #DarioAmodei #opinion #Technology
-
Fear and Loathing of AI (Part V): The Real Product Isn’t AI — It’s Compliance
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News — with OpenAI ChatGPT
Every major technology claims to sell capability.
What it actually sells is behavior.
Artificial intelligence is marketed as intelligence, automation, assistance, and insight. But those are not the real product. They are the wrapper.
The real product is compliance.
From tools to rulebooks
AI systems do not merely help people work. They define how work is allowed to happen.
They decide:
- what is acceptable output,
- what counts as efficiency,
- what language is permitted,
- what pace is required,
- what deviation triggers review.
Once embedded, these systems stop being optional tools and start functioning as invisible rulebooks.
You are not just using AI.
You are being shaped by it.Normalizing the machine’s priorities
AI systems optimize for what they can measure.
That sounds neutral. It isn’t.
What gets measured becomes what matters:
- speed over care,
- volume over judgment,
- consistency over insight,
- compliance over discretion.
Human nuance becomes noise.
Context becomes friction.Over time, workers internalize this logic. They adjust themselves to match the system rather than questioning whether the system is correct.
That is not assistance.
That is conditioning.Consent by exhaustion
Most people do not choose compliance.
They accept it because resisting it is exhausting.
Opting out means:
- losing access,
- losing income,
- losing relevance,
- losing visibility.
So people adapt. Quietly. Incrementally. Rationally.
Each update narrows the corridor.
Each “improvement” reduces discretion.
Each convenience carries a hidden obligation.Eventually, compliance feels like normal work.
The illusion of neutrality
AI is often described as objective.
But every AI system encodes:
- institutional priorities,
- business incentives,
- legal risk tolerance,
- and managerial worldview.
Those values are not debated by users.
They are imposed through interfaces.When people are told “the system decided,” accountability dissolves. Authority becomes abstract. Power becomes deniable.
No one is responsible.
Everyone must comply.Why this matters more than jobs
Job loss is visible.
Compliance is subtle.A workforce that still exists but no longer questions:
- pacing,
- evaluation,
- fairness,
- or purpose
is easier to manage than one that resists.
The danger is not a future without work.
It is a future where work continues, but autonomy does not.
The quiet trade
AI offers convenience in exchange for conformity.
For many, that trade feels necessary. Sometimes it is.
But it should never be invisible.
Because once compliance is normalized, reclaiming discretion becomes almost impossible.
A line that still exists
AI can be useful without being authoritative.
It can assist without dictating.
It can serve without ruling.But that only happens when:
- systems remain accountable,
- humans retain override power,
- and institutions are forced to justify decisions.
Without those limits, AI doesn’t just change work.
It trains people to accept less agency as the price of participation.
That is not progress.
That is control, automated.
For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com
#AIGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #automation #compliance #futureOfWork #Labor #Occupy25 #platformCapitalism #Surveillance #technologyCritique #workplaceControl #WPSNews -
Fear and Loathing of AI (Part V): The Real Product Isn’t AI — It’s Compliance
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News — with OpenAI ChatGPT
Every major technology claims to sell capability.
What it actually sells is behavior.
Artificial intelligence is marketed as intelligence, automation, assistance, and insight. But those are not the real product. They are the wrapper.
The real product is compliance.
From tools to rulebooks
AI systems do not merely help people work. They define how work is allowed to happen.
They decide:
- what is acceptable output,
- what counts as efficiency,
- what language is permitted,
- what pace is required,
- what deviation triggers review.
Once embedded, these systems stop being optional tools and start functioning as invisible rulebooks.
You are not just using AI.
You are being shaped by it.Normalizing the machine’s priorities
AI systems optimize for what they can measure.
That sounds neutral. It isn’t.
What gets measured becomes what matters:
- speed over care,
- volume over judgment,
- consistency over insight,
- compliance over discretion.
Human nuance becomes noise.
Context becomes friction.Over time, workers internalize this logic. They adjust themselves to match the system rather than questioning whether the system is correct.
That is not assistance.
That is conditioning.Consent by exhaustion
Most people do not choose compliance.
They accept it because resisting it is exhausting.
Opting out means:
- losing access,
- losing income,
- losing relevance,
- losing visibility.
So people adapt. Quietly. Incrementally. Rationally.
Each update narrows the corridor.
Each “improvement” reduces discretion.
Each convenience carries a hidden obligation.Eventually, compliance feels like normal work.
The illusion of neutrality
AI is often described as objective.
But every AI system encodes:
- institutional priorities,
- business incentives,
- legal risk tolerance,
- and managerial worldview.
Those values are not debated by users.
They are imposed through interfaces.When people are told “the system decided,” accountability dissolves. Authority becomes abstract. Power becomes deniable.
No one is responsible.
Everyone must comply.Why this matters more than jobs
Job loss is visible.
Compliance is subtle.A workforce that still exists but no longer questions:
- pacing,
- evaluation,
- fairness,
- or purpose
is easier to manage than one that resists.
The danger is not a future without work.
It is a future where work continues, but autonomy does not.
The quiet trade
AI offers convenience in exchange for conformity.
For many, that trade feels necessary. Sometimes it is.
But it should never be invisible.
Because once compliance is normalized, reclaiming discretion becomes almost impossible.
A line that still exists
AI can be useful without being authoritative.
It can assist without dictating.
It can serve without ruling.But that only happens when:
- systems remain accountable,
- humans retain override power,
- and institutions are forced to justify decisions.
Without those limits, AI doesn’t just change work.
It trains people to accept less agency as the price of participation.
That is not progress.
That is control, automated.
For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com
#AIGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #automation #compliance #futureOfWork #Labor #Occupy25 #platformCapitalism #Surveillance #technologyCritique #workplaceControl #WPSNews -
Fear and Loathing of AI (Part V): The Real Product Isn’t AI — It’s Compliance
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News — with OpenAI ChatGPT
Every major technology claims to sell capability.
What it actually sells is behavior.
Artificial intelligence is marketed as intelligence, automation, assistance, and insight. But those are not the real product. They are the wrapper.
The real product is compliance.
From tools to rulebooks
AI systems do not merely help people work. They define how work is allowed to happen.
They decide:
- what is acceptable output,
- what counts as efficiency,
- what language is permitted,
- what pace is required,
- what deviation triggers review.
Once embedded, these systems stop being optional tools and start functioning as invisible rulebooks.
You are not just using AI.
You are being shaped by it.Normalizing the machine’s priorities
AI systems optimize for what they can measure.
That sounds neutral. It isn’t.
What gets measured becomes what matters:
- speed over care,
- volume over judgment,
- consistency over insight,
- compliance over discretion.
Human nuance becomes noise.
Context becomes friction.Over time, workers internalize this logic. They adjust themselves to match the system rather than questioning whether the system is correct.
That is not assistance.
That is conditioning.Consent by exhaustion
Most people do not choose compliance.
They accept it because resisting it is exhausting.
Opting out means:
- losing access,
- losing income,
- losing relevance,
- losing visibility.
So people adapt. Quietly. Incrementally. Rationally.
Each update narrows the corridor.
Each “improvement” reduces discretion.
Each convenience carries a hidden obligation.Eventually, compliance feels like normal work.
The illusion of neutrality
AI is often described as objective.
But every AI system encodes:
- institutional priorities,
- business incentives,
- legal risk tolerance,
- and managerial worldview.
Those values are not debated by users.
They are imposed through interfaces.When people are told “the system decided,” accountability dissolves. Authority becomes abstract. Power becomes deniable.
No one is responsible.
Everyone must comply.Why this matters more than jobs
Job loss is visible.
Compliance is subtle.A workforce that still exists but no longer questions:
- pacing,
- evaluation,
- fairness,
- or purpose
is easier to manage than one that resists.
The danger is not a future without work.
It is a future where work continues, but autonomy does not.
The quiet trade
AI offers convenience in exchange for conformity.
For many, that trade feels necessary. Sometimes it is.
But it should never be invisible.
Because once compliance is normalized, reclaiming discretion becomes almost impossible.
A line that still exists
AI can be useful without being authoritative.
It can assist without dictating.
It can serve without ruling.But that only happens when:
- systems remain accountable,
- humans retain override power,
- and institutions are forced to justify decisions.
Without those limits, AI doesn’t just change work.
It trains people to accept less agency as the price of participation.
That is not progress.
That is control, automated.
For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com
#AIGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #automation #compliance #futureOfWork #Labor #Occupy25 #platformCapitalism #Surveillance #technologyCritique #workplaceControl #WPSNews -
Fear and Loathing of AI (Part V): The Real Product Isn’t AI — It’s Compliance
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News — with OpenAI ChatGPT
Every major technology claims to sell capability.
What it actually sells is behavior.
Artificial intelligence is marketed as intelligence, automation, assistance, and insight. But those are not the real product. They are the wrapper.
The real product is compliance.
From tools to rulebooks
AI systems do not merely help people work. They define how work is allowed to happen.
They decide:
- what is acceptable output,
- what counts as efficiency,
- what language is permitted,
- what pace is required,
- what deviation triggers review.
Once embedded, these systems stop being optional tools and start functioning as invisible rulebooks.
You are not just using AI.
You are being shaped by it.Normalizing the machine’s priorities
AI systems optimize for what they can measure.
That sounds neutral. It isn’t.
What gets measured becomes what matters:
- speed over care,
- volume over judgment,
- consistency over insight,
- compliance over discretion.
Human nuance becomes noise.
Context becomes friction.Over time, workers internalize this logic. They adjust themselves to match the system rather than questioning whether the system is correct.
That is not assistance.
That is conditioning.Consent by exhaustion
Most people do not choose compliance.
They accept it because resisting it is exhausting.
Opting out means:
- losing access,
- losing income,
- losing relevance,
- losing visibility.
So people adapt. Quietly. Incrementally. Rationally.
Each update narrows the corridor.
Each “improvement” reduces discretion.
Each convenience carries a hidden obligation.Eventually, compliance feels like normal work.
The illusion of neutrality
AI is often described as objective.
But every AI system encodes:
- institutional priorities,
- business incentives,
- legal risk tolerance,
- and managerial worldview.
Those values are not debated by users.
They are imposed through interfaces.When people are told “the system decided,” accountability dissolves. Authority becomes abstract. Power becomes deniable.
No one is responsible.
Everyone must comply.Why this matters more than jobs
Job loss is visible.
Compliance is subtle.A workforce that still exists but no longer questions:
- pacing,
- evaluation,
- fairness,
- or purpose
is easier to manage than one that resists.
The danger is not a future without work.
It is a future where work continues, but autonomy does not.
The quiet trade
AI offers convenience in exchange for conformity.
For many, that trade feels necessary. Sometimes it is.
But it should never be invisible.
Because once compliance is normalized, reclaiming discretion becomes almost impossible.
A line that still exists
AI can be useful without being authoritative.
It can assist without dictating.
It can serve without ruling.But that only happens when:
- systems remain accountable,
- humans retain override power,
- and institutions are forced to justify decisions.
Without those limits, AI doesn’t just change work.
It trains people to accept less agency as the price of participation.
That is not progress.
That is control, automated.
For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com
#AIGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #automation #compliance #futureOfWork #Labor #Occupy25 #platformCapitalism #Surveillance #technologyCritique #workplaceControl #WPSNews -
Fear and Loathing of AI (Part V): The Real Product Isn’t AI — It’s Compliance
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News — with OpenAI ChatGPT
Every major technology claims to sell capability.
What it actually sells is behavior.
Artificial intelligence is marketed as intelligence, automation, assistance, and insight. But those are not the real product. They are the wrapper.
The real product is compliance.
From tools to rulebooks
AI systems do not merely help people work. They define how work is allowed to happen.
They decide:
- what is acceptable output,
- what counts as efficiency,
- what language is permitted,
- what pace is required,
- what deviation triggers review.
Once embedded, these systems stop being optional tools and start functioning as invisible rulebooks.
You are not just using AI.
You are being shaped by it.Normalizing the machine’s priorities
AI systems optimize for what they can measure.
That sounds neutral. It isn’t.
What gets measured becomes what matters:
- speed over care,
- volume over judgment,
- consistency over insight,
- compliance over discretion.
Human nuance becomes noise.
Context becomes friction.Over time, workers internalize this logic. They adjust themselves to match the system rather than questioning whether the system is correct.
That is not assistance.
That is conditioning.Consent by exhaustion
Most people do not choose compliance.
They accept it because resisting it is exhausting.
Opting out means:
- losing access,
- losing income,
- losing relevance,
- losing visibility.
So people adapt. Quietly. Incrementally. Rationally.
Each update narrows the corridor.
Each “improvement” reduces discretion.
Each convenience carries a hidden obligation.Eventually, compliance feels like normal work.
The illusion of neutrality
AI is often described as objective.
But every AI system encodes:
- institutional priorities,
- business incentives,
- legal risk tolerance,
- and managerial worldview.
Those values are not debated by users.
They are imposed through interfaces.When people are told “the system decided,” accountability dissolves. Authority becomes abstract. Power becomes deniable.
No one is responsible.
Everyone must comply.Why this matters more than jobs
Job loss is visible.
Compliance is subtle.A workforce that still exists but no longer questions:
- pacing,
- evaluation,
- fairness,
- or purpose
is easier to manage than one that resists.
The danger is not a future without work.
It is a future where work continues, but autonomy does not.
The quiet trade
AI offers convenience in exchange for conformity.
For many, that trade feels necessary. Sometimes it is.
But it should never be invisible.
Because once compliance is normalized, reclaiming discretion becomes almost impossible.
A line that still exists
AI can be useful without being authoritative.
It can assist without dictating.
It can serve without ruling.But that only happens when:
- systems remain accountable,
- humans retain override power,
- and institutions are forced to justify decisions.
Without those limits, AI doesn’t just change work.
It trains people to accept less agency as the price of participation.
That is not progress.
That is control, automated.
For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com
#AIGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #automation #compliance #futureOfWork #Labor #Occupy25 #platformCapitalism #Surveillance #technologyCritique #workplaceControl #WPSNews -
🚨 New FREE Book - Essential Heresies: The Struggle of Early Christianity
What separates faith from heresy? Who has the authority to define truth in the formative centuries of Christianity?
From disputes over the nature of Christ to the condemnation of Gnostic, Marcionite, or Arian currentsy🔗https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=7369438
#LLM #MedicalNLP #LegalTech #MedTech #AIethics #AIgovernance #cryptoreg
#healthcare #ArtificialIntelligence #NLP #aifutures #lawstodon
#tech #agustinvstartari #linguistics #ai #LRM -
🚨 New FREE Book - Essential Heresies: The Struggle of Early Christianity
What separates faith from heresy? Who has the authority to define truth in the formative centuries of Christianity?
From disputes over the nature of Christ to the condemnation of Gnostic, Marcionite🔗https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=7369438
#LLM #MedicalNLP #LegalTech #MedTech #AIethics #AIgovernance #cryptoreg
#healthcare #ArtificialIntelligence #NLP #aifutures #lawstodon
#tech #agustinvstartari #linguistics #ai #LRM -
🚨 New FREE Book - Essential Heresies: The Struggle of Early Christianity
What separates faith from heresy? Who has the authority to define truth in the formative centuries of Christianity?
From disputes over the nature of Christ to the condemnation of Gnostic, Marcionite, or Arian currentsy🔗https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=7369438
#LLM #MedicalNLP #LegalTech #MedTech #AIethics #AIgovernance #cryptoreg
#healthcare #ArtificialIntelligence #NLP #aifutures #lawstodon
#tech #agustinvstartari #linguistics #ai #LRM -
🚨 New FREE Book - Essential Heresies: The Struggle of Early Christianity
What separates faith from heresy? Who has the authority to define truth in the formative centuries of Christianity?
From disputes over the nature of Christ to the condemnation of Gnostic, Marcionite, or Arian currentsy
🔗https://zenodo.org/records/22162685#LLM #MedicalNLP #LegalTech #MedTech #AIethics #AIgovernance #cryptoreg
#healthcare #ArtificialIntelligence #NLP #aifutures #lawstodon
#tech #agustinvstartari #linguistics #ai #LRM -
🚨 New FREE Book - Essential Heresies: The Struggle of Early Christianity
What separates faith from heresy? Who has the authority to define truth in the formative centuries of Christianity?
From disputes over the nature of Christ to the condemnation of Gnostic, Marcionite, or Arian currentsy
🔗https://zenodo.org/records/22162685#LLM #MedicalNLP #LegalTech #MedTech #AIethics #AIgovernance #cryptoreg
#healthcare #ArtificialIntelligence #NLP #aifutures #lawstodon
#tech #agustinvstartari #linguistics #ai #LRM -
🚨 New FREE Book - Essential Heresies: The Struggle of Early Christianity
What separates faith from heresy? Who has the authority to define truth in the formative centuries of Christianity?
From disputes over the nature of Christ to the condemnation of Gnostic, Marcionite, or Arian currentsy
🔗https://zenodo.org/records/22162685#LLM #MedicalNLP #LegalTech #MedTech #AIethics #AIgovernance #cryptoreg
#healthcare #ArtificialIntelligence #NLP #aifutures #lawstodon
#tech #agustinvstartari #linguistics #ai #LRM -
🚨 New FREE Book - Essential Heresies: The Struggle of Early Christianity
What separates faith from heresy? Who has the authority to define truth in the formative centuries of Christianity?
A critical examination of the doctrinal controversies that defined the first centuries of the Church.🔗https://zenodo.org/records/22162685
#LLM #MedicalNLP #LegalTech #MedTech #AIethics #AIgovernance #cryptoreg
#healthcare #ArtificialIntelligence #NLP #aifutures #lawstodon
#tech #agustinvstartari #linguistics #ai #LRM -
Under the EU #AIAct, deployers of high-risk AI systems must assess their potential impact on fundamental rights.
But how can Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments (FRIAs) be meaningful rather than a simple checklist?
👇️ In case you missed it, we developed a practical guide on the topic with the Danish Institute for Human Rights. Read it today here:
https://ecnl.org/publications/guide-fundamental-rights-impact-assessments-fria#FundamentalRights #HumanRights #AIgovernance #AIethics #Accountability #AIregulation #CivilSociety
-
“De AI Act was járen in de maak en toch is er nu een minder groot gevoel van urgentie dan ik had verwacht.”
https://www.agconnect.nl/maatschappij/artificial-intelligence/ai-governance-wacht-op-standaarden-gedragscodes-en-praktijk
#AIAct #AIgovernance #ethiek #AIwetgeving #AIregulering
#AGConnect #SijthoffMedia -
“Governance is méér dan compliance”, vertelt Ashley Casovan, managing director van het AI Governance Center van de International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP).
https://www.agconnect.nl/maatschappij/artificial-intelligence/ai-governance-wacht-op-standaarden-gedragscodes-en-praktijk
#AI #AIgovernance #IAPP
#AGConnect #SijthoffMedia