#techpolicy — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #techpolicy, aggregated by home.social.
-
The EU's new tech-sovereignty package would let Brussels override chipmaker contracts during shortages and bar US platforms from sensitive government data. The moves follow failed bets on domestic chip production and reflect broader tensions over supply chain dependence.
https://www.implicator.ai/eu-tech-sovereignty-package-curbs-us-cloud-and-adds-chip-crisis-powers/
-
The EU's new tech-sovereignty package would let Brussels override chipmaker contracts during shortages and bar US platforms from sensitive government data. The moves follow failed bets on domestic chip production and reflect broader tensions over supply chain dependence.
https://www.implicator.ai/eu-tech-sovereignty-package-curbs-us-cloud-and-adds-chip-crisis-powers/
-
The EU's new tech-sovereignty package would let Brussels override chipmaker contracts during shortages and bar US platforms from sensitive government data. The moves follow failed bets on domestic chip production and reflect broader tensions over supply chain dependence.
https://www.implicator.ai/eu-tech-sovereignty-package-curbs-us-cloud-and-adds-chip-crisis-powers/
-
The EU's new tech-sovereignty package would let Brussels override chipmaker contracts during shortages and bar US platforms from sensitive government data. The moves follow failed bets on domestic chip production and reflect broader tensions over supply chain dependence.
https://www.implicator.ai/eu-tech-sovereignty-package-curbs-us-cloud-and-adds-chip-crisis-powers/
-
US's big bet on quantum computing may not be legal
#HackerNews #quantumcomputing #techpolicy #legalissues #USinnovation #cybersecurity
-
Wow. Until now the New York Times has been little more than free advertising disguised as news for these new AI tech companies like OpenAI or Anthropic. If the New York Times is allowing op-eds accusing the Democratic Party of falling for the hype about LLMs (the hype about it soon becoming sentient and taking over the world) against all of the best expert opinion to the contrary, then The Times are clearly beginning to see a wave of revolt rising against this technology. They are probably trying to do a little damage control for all the propaganda they have been doing until now.
#tech #AI #LLMs #TechPolicy #Policy #Law
RE: https://sfba.social/@gypsyvegan/116649711978778077 -
Progressives Are Listening to the Wrong People on A.I.
@EoinHiggins
May 26, 2026archive link: https://archive.is/hOYsl
#technoligarchy #ai #techpolicy #leftist #mediaLiteracy #TESCREAL #TheNetworkState #TheNerdReich
-
China is treating AI talent as national infrastructure. Top researchers and founders at firms like Alibaba and DeepSeek now need travel approval, extending controls once limited to state companies. The Manus deal—where regulators blocked a Meta acquisition—appears to have accelerated the shift. What this signals about brain drain and innovation incentives remains to be watched.
https://www.implicator.ai/beijing-locks-people-micron-sells-scarcity-denmark-proves-use/
-
Beijing is tightening control over AI talent mobility, requiring approval before overseas travel for researchers and executives at private firms including Alibaba and DeepSeek. The shift marks a move from tech restrictions to personnel constraints as China seeks to retain scarce AI expertise.
https://www.implicator.ai/beijing-extends-its-ai-controls-from-deepseek-to-alibaba/
-
I've been working on these ideas for a while. Now it's time to see if they hold up against real scrutiny.
-
Ninth Circuit Panel Goes Out of Its Way to Question Section 230–DOE vs. Meta
#HackerNews #NinthCircuit #Section230 #Meta #LegalNews #TechPolicy
-
Ninth Circuit Panel Goes Out of Its Way to Question Section 230–DOE vs. Meta
#HackerNews #NinthCircuit #Section230 #Meta #LegalNews #TechPolicy
-
Ninth Circuit Panel Goes Out of Its Way to Question Section 230–DOE vs. Meta
#HackerNews #NinthCircuit #Section230 #Meta #LegalNews #TechPolicy
-
Ninth Circuit Panel Goes Out of Its Way to Question Section 230–DOE vs. Meta
#HackerNews #NinthCircuit #Section230 #Meta #LegalNews #TechPolicy
-
Ninth Circuit Panel Goes Out of Its Way to Question Section 230–DOE vs. Meta
#HackerNews #NinthCircuit #Section230 #Meta #LegalNews #TechPolicy
-
ICYMI: Trump's AI cybersecurity order: what the shelved draft actually says: A draft executive order on AI and cybersecurity was shelved on May 22. Here is what the seven-page document proposed for frontier models and federal agencies. https://ppc.land/trumps-ai-cybersecurity-order-what-the-shelved-draft-actually-says/ #Cybersecurity #AI #Trump #ExecutiveOrder #TechPolicy
-
Currently, most of Africa lacks the infrastructure to capture the value its young population could create. Let's hope the recent tech policy can change it.
#digitalsovereignty #techpolicy
https://www.kbc.co.ke/kenya-hosts-ai-summit-as-africa-pushes-for-digital-sovereignty/ -
I wrote a short, reflective blog post because social media musings be transient.
https://medium.com/@aarohini/policy-work-beyond-technological-moral-panic-4fdd2eb0b0aa
#policy #socialpolicy #techpolicy #publicpolicy #moralpanic #reflections #blog
-
I wrote a short, reflective blog post because social media musings be transient.
https://medium.com/@aarohini/policy-work-beyond-technological-moral-panic-4fdd2eb0b0aa
#policy #socialpolicy #techpolicy #publicpolicy #moralpanic #reflections #blog
-
I wrote a short, reflective blog post because social media musings be transient.
https://medium.com/@aarohini/policy-work-beyond-technological-moral-panic-4fdd2eb0b0aa
#policy #socialpolicy #techpolicy #publicpolicy #moralpanic #reflections #blog
-
I wrote a short, reflective blog post because social media musings be transient.
https://medium.com/@aarohini/policy-work-beyond-technological-moral-panic-4fdd2eb0b0aa
#policy #socialpolicy #techpolicy #publicpolicy #moralpanic #reflections #blog
-
I wrote a short, reflective blog post because social media musings be transient.
https://medium.com/@aarohini/policy-work-beyond-technological-moral-panic-4fdd2eb0b0aa
#policy #socialpolicy #techpolicy #publicpolicy #moralpanic #reflections #blog
-
New documentary asks if we are doomed by AI
A deep cinematic look into the existential timeline. Featuring intense interviews with top global researchers and safety advocates, the project investigates whether accelerating corporate competition will irrevocably shatter safety alignment protocols before governance models can adapt.
#AIEthics #Documentary #TechPolicy #ExistentialRisk #AISafety #CinematicNews
https://www.technology-news-channel.com/new-documentary-asks-if-we-are-doomed-by-ai/ -
Very proud of this policy work connected to on-ground realities done by a colleague and me. It rejects technological determinism, a moral panic approach, and punitive models. It considers how policy affects vulnerable populations differently and identifies normative assumptions hidden inside policy design. And yes, it comes from lived lifetimes.
LinkedIn post: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7463818456165961730/
-
White House ordering agencies to place its new app on all employees' govt phones
#HackerNews #WhiteHouse #App #Agencies #GovernmentPhones #TechPolicy
-
White House ordering agencies to place its new app on all employees' govt phones
#HackerNews #WhiteHouse #App #Agencies #GovernmentPhones #TechPolicy
-
AI Whistleblower: We Are Being Gaslit By The AI Companies! They’re Hiding The Truth About AI!
The veil of safety is slipping. A prominent former safety researcher comes forward with internal telemetry logs, alleging that major frontier labs are actively downplaying recursive capabilities and architectural vulnerabilities to avoid regulatory intervention.
#AISafety #Whistleblower #TechPolicy #AIEthics #SiliconValley #TechNews
#Ai #tech -
AI Whistleblower: We Are Being Gaslit By The AI Companies! They’re Hiding The Truth About AI!
The veil of safety is slipping. A prominent former safety researcher comes forward with internal telemetry logs, alleging that major frontier labs are actively downplaying recursive capabilities and architectural vulnerabilities to avoid regulatory intervention.
#AISafety #Whistleblower #TechPolicy #AIEthics #SiliconValley #TechNews
#Ai #tech -
AI Whistleblower: We Are Being Gaslit By The AI Companies! They’re Hiding The Truth About AI!
The veil of safety is slipping. A prominent former safety researcher comes forward with internal telemetry logs, alleging that major frontier labs are actively downplaying recursive capabilities and architectural vulnerabilities to avoid regulatory intervention.
#AISafety #Whistleblower #TechPolicy #AIEthics #SiliconValley #TechNews
#Ai #tech -
AI Whistleblower: We Are Being Gaslit By The AI Companies! They’re Hiding The Truth About AI!
The veil of safety is slipping. A prominent former safety researcher comes forward with internal telemetry logs, alleging that major frontier labs are actively downplaying recursive capabilities and architectural vulnerabilities to avoid regulatory intervention.
#AISafety #Whistleblower #TechPolicy #AIEthics #SiliconValley #TechNews
#Ai #tech -
AI Whistleblower: We Are Being Gaslit By The AI Companies! They’re Hiding The Truth About AI!
The veil of safety is slipping. A prominent former safety researcher comes forward with internal telemetry logs, alleging that major frontier labs are actively downplaying recursive capabilities and architectural vulnerabilities to avoid regulatory intervention.
#AISafety #Whistleblower #TechPolicy #AIEthics #SiliconValley #TechNews
#Ai #tech -
Digital Vulnerability Now Front and Center for National Security
Senior Army officer says digital security must be designed into systems from the start. Affects national security and requires public-private collaboration.
#DigitalSecurity, #CyberSecurity, #NationalSecurity, #AISecurity, #TechPolicy
https://newsletter.tf/army-officer-digital-security-built-in-from-start/
-
Digital Vulnerability Now Front and Center for National Security
Senior Army officer says digital security must be designed into systems from the start. Affects national security and requires public-private collaboration.
#DigitalSecurity, #CyberSecurity, #NationalSecurity, #AISecurity, #TechPolicy
https://newsletter.tf/army-officer-digital-security-built-in-from-start/
-
A senior Army officer stated that digital security and trust must be built into new technologies from the very beginning, not added later.
#DigitalSecurity, #CyberSecurity, #NationalSecurity, #AISecurity, #TechPolicy
https://newsletter.tf/army-officer-digital-security-built-in-from-start/ -
A senior Army officer stated that digital security and trust must be built into new technologies from the very beginning, not added later.
#DigitalSecurity, #CyberSecurity, #NationalSecurity, #AISecurity, #TechPolicy
https://newsletter.tf/army-officer-digital-security-built-in-from-start/ -
The European Commission has published draft guidelines for classifying high-risk AI systems 🤖
They want to hear from everyone! Have your say by 23rd June (link below)✍🏼
I’ve analysed all 167 pages (by myself, no AI) so you don’t have to 😮💨
Key points I found interesting:
📌The EC classifies "high-risk" AI systems as those which could have an adverse impact on the health & safety of persons, esp. the "safety components" of products.
📌Potential high-risk AI systems are: Biometrics; critical infrastructure; education; employment; essential private / public services; law enforcement; migration & border control; the courts & democratic processes.
📌The proposed classification covers safety components of *all* currently regulated products, e.g. a PC, smartphone, toy, medical device, consumer good, automotive or aviation industry product, lift, smart home appliance, protective equipment, even any use of radio or electromagnetic spectrum (for mobile networks, radar, fibre optics, cancer treatment etc).
📌The AI Act says any safety risk generated by a product, including AI systems, has to be prevented & mitigated using a “safety function”.
📌A safety function would monitor & detect situations which may lead to physical harm or damage to people or property, prevent physical harm, control a product to limit any physical harm or resulting negative consequence, or supervise another AI system.
📌Examples of "safety function": AI detects a human’s presence near a robot & triggers a “safe stop” or speed reduction to prevent injury; or AI in a train to monitor speed limits & prevent derailments.
📌If “high risk”, the product must go through third-party conformity assessment before it can be put on the market or put in service.
📌An AI system cannot be classed as “low risk” simply if it has a requirement for human involvement; rather human oversight is a prerequisite for any high-risk AI system.
📌People are defined as a “natural person” or a “legal person”, e.g. is an AI system using company data to assess the credit score of a business owner, or is it using personal data to assess a private individual?
📌Firms could argue an AI system only performs a “narrow procedural task”, e.g. transforming unstructured data into structured data, but if the AI makes any kind of value judgement on data, that is high risk.
📌Fascinatingly, the classifications describe "high risk" profiling AI systems to locate a missing child by analysing a neighbourhood’s residents for sex offenders & filtering potential suspects, or monitoring online posts to identify potential extremist affiliation.
📌But police could use “low risk” AI systems to automate admin tasks like scheduling patrol shifts; police website chatbots; automated number plate readers; or for scanning CCTV footage to check for speeding cars.
Have your say here 📢:
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/consultations/targeted-consultation-draft-guidelines-classification-high-risk-artificial-intelligence-systems#AI #AIregulation #technews #EuropeanCommission #techpolicy #EU #technology
-
The European Commission has published draft guidelines for classifying high-risk AI systems 🤖
They want to hear from everyone! Have your say by 23rd June (link below)✍🏼
I’ve analysed all 167 pages (by myself, no AI) so you don’t have to 😮💨
Key points I found interesting:
📌The EC classifies "high-risk" AI systems as those which could have an adverse impact on the health & safety of persons, esp. the "safety components" of products.
📌Potential high-risk AI systems are: Biometrics; critical infrastructure; education; employment; essential private / public services; law enforcement; migration & border control; the courts & democratic processes.
📌The proposed classification covers safety components of *all* currently regulated products, e.g. a PC, smartphone, toy, medical device, consumer good, automotive or aviation industry product, lift, smart home appliance, protective equipment, even any use of radio or electromagnetic spectrum (for mobile networks, radar, fibre optics, cancer treatment etc).
📌The AI Act says any safety risk generated by a product, including AI systems, has to be prevented & mitigated using a “safety function”.
📌A safety function would monitor & detect situations which may lead to physical harm or damage to people or property, prevent physical harm, control a product to limit any physical harm or resulting negative consequence, or supervise another AI system.
📌Examples of "safety function": AI detects a human’s presence near a robot & triggers a “safe stop” or speed reduction to prevent injury; or AI in a train to monitor speed limits & prevent derailments.
📌If “high risk”, the product must go through third-party conformity assessment before it can be put on the market or put in service.
📌An AI system cannot be classed as “low risk” simply if it has a requirement for human involvement; rather human oversight is a prerequisite for any high-risk AI system.
📌People are defined as a “natural person” or a “legal person”, e.g. is an AI system using company data to assess the credit score of a business owner, or is it using personal data to assess a private individual?
📌Firms could argue an AI system only performs a “narrow procedural task”, e.g. transforming unstructured data into structured data, but if the AI makes any kind of value judgement on data, that is high risk.
📌Fascinatingly, the classifications describe "high risk" profiling AI systems to locate a missing child by analysing a neighbourhood’s residents for sex offenders & filtering potential suspects, or monitoring online posts to identify potential extremist affiliation.
📌But police could use “low risk” AI systems to automate admin tasks like scheduling patrol shifts; police website chatbots; automated number plate readers; or for scanning CCTV footage to check for speeding cars.
Have your say here 📢:
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/consultations/targeted-consultation-draft-guidelines-classification-high-risk-artificial-intelligence-systems#AI #AIregulation #technews #EuropeanCommission #techpolicy #EU #technology
-
The European Commission has published draft guidelines for classifying high-risk AI systems 🤖
They want to hear from everyone! Have your say by 23rd June (link below)✍🏼
I’ve analysed all 167 pages (by myself, no AI) so you don’t have to 😮💨
Key points I found interesting:
📌The EC classifies "high-risk" AI systems as those which could have an adverse impact on the health & safety of persons, esp. the "safety components" of products.
📌Potential high-risk AI systems are: Biometrics; critical infrastructure; education; employment; essential private / public services; law enforcement; migration & border control; the courts & democratic processes.
📌The proposed classification covers safety components of *all* currently regulated products, e.g. a PC, smartphone, toy, medical device, consumer good, automotive or aviation industry product, lift, smart home appliance, protective equipment, even any use of radio or electromagnetic spectrum (for mobile networks, radar, fibre optics, cancer treatment etc).
📌The AI Act says any safety risk generated by a product, including AI systems, has to be prevented & mitigated using a “safety function”.
📌A safety function would monitor & detect situations which may lead to physical harm or damage to people or property, prevent physical harm, control a product to limit any physical harm or resulting negative consequence, or supervise another AI system.
📌Examples of "safety function": AI detects a human’s presence near a robot & triggers a “safe stop” or speed reduction to prevent injury; or AI in a train to monitor speed limits & prevent derailments.
📌If “high risk”, the product must go through third-party conformity assessment before it can be put on the market or put in service.
📌An AI system cannot be classed as “low risk” simply if it has a requirement for human involvement; rather human oversight is a prerequisite for any high-risk AI system.
📌People are defined as a “natural person” or a “legal person”, e.g. is an AI system using company data to assess the credit score of a business owner, or is it using personal data to assess a private individual?
📌Firms could argue an AI system only performs a “narrow procedural task”, e.g. transforming unstructured data into structured data, but if the AI makes any kind of value judgement on data, that is high risk.
📌Fascinatingly, the classifications describe "high risk" profiling AI systems to locate a missing child by analysing a neighbourhood’s residents for sex offenders & filtering potential suspects, or monitoring online posts to identify potential extremist affiliation.
📌But police could use “low risk” AI systems to automate admin tasks like scheduling patrol shifts; police website chatbots; automated number plate readers; or for scanning CCTV footage to check for speeding cars.
Have your say here 📢:
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/consultations/targeted-consultation-draft-guidelines-classification-high-risk-artificial-intelligence-systems#AI #AIregulation #technews #EuropeanCommission #techpolicy #EU #technology
-
The European Commission has published draft guidelines for classifying high-risk AI systems 🤖
They want to hear from everyone! Have your say by 23rd June (link below)✍🏼
I’ve analysed all 167 pages (by myself, no AI) so you don’t have to 😮💨
Key points I found interesting:
📌The EC classifies "high-risk" AI systems as those which could have an adverse impact on the health & safety of persons, esp. the "safety components" of products.
📌Potential high-risk AI systems are: Biometrics; critical infrastructure; education; employment; essential private / public services; law enforcement; migration & border control; the courts & democratic processes.
📌The proposed classification covers safety components of *all* currently regulated products, e.g. a PC, smartphone, toy, medical device, consumer good, automotive or aviation industry product, lift, smart home appliance, protective equipment, even any use of radio or electromagnetic spectrum (for mobile networks, radar, fibre optics, cancer treatment etc).
📌The AI Act says any safety risk generated by a product, including AI systems, has to be prevented & mitigated using a “safety function”.
📌A safety function would monitor & detect situations which may lead to physical harm or damage to people or property, prevent physical harm, control a product to limit any physical harm or resulting negative consequence, or supervise another AI system.
📌Examples of "safety function": AI detects a human’s presence near a robot & triggers a “safe stop” or speed reduction to prevent injury; or AI in a train to monitor speed limits & prevent derailments.
📌If “high risk”, the product must go through third-party conformity assessment before it can be put on the market or put in service.
📌An AI system cannot be classed as “low risk” simply if it has a requirement for human involvement; rather human oversight is a prerequisite for any high-risk AI system.
📌People are defined as a “natural person” or a “legal person”, e.g. is an AI system using company data to assess the credit score of a business owner, or is it using personal data to assess a private individual?
📌Firms could argue an AI system only performs a “narrow procedural task”, e.g. transforming unstructured data into structured data, but if the AI makes any kind of value judgement on data, that is high risk.
📌Fascinatingly, the classifications describe "high risk" profiling AI systems to locate a missing child by analysing a neighbourhood’s residents for sex offenders & filtering potential suspects, or monitoring online posts to identify potential extremist affiliation.
📌But police could use “low risk” AI systems to automate admin tasks like scheduling patrol shifts; police website chatbots; automated number plate readers; or for scanning CCTV footage to check for speeding cars.
Have your say here 📢:
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/consultations/targeted-consultation-draft-guidelines-classification-high-risk-artificial-intelligence-systems#AI #AIregulation #technews #EuropeanCommission #techpolicy #EU #technology
-
The European Commission has published draft guidelines for classifying high-risk AI systems 🤖
They want to hear from everyone! Have your say by 23rd June (link below)✍🏼
I’ve analysed all 167 pages (by myself, no AI) so you don’t have to 😮💨
Key points I found interesting:
📌The EC classifies "high-risk" AI systems as those which could have an adverse impact on the health & safety of persons, esp. the "safety components" of products.
📌Potential high-risk AI systems are: Biometrics; critical infrastructure; education; employment; essential private / public services; law enforcement; migration & border control; the courts & democratic processes.
📌The proposed classification covers safety components of *all* currently regulated products, e.g. a PC, smartphone, toy, medical device, consumer good, automotive or aviation industry product, lift, smart home appliance, protective equipment, even any use of radio or electromagnetic spectrum (for mobile networks, radar, fibre optics, cancer treatment etc).
📌The AI Act says any safety risk generated by a product, including AI systems, has to be prevented & mitigated using a “safety function”.
📌A safety function would monitor & detect situations which may lead to physical harm or damage to people or property, prevent physical harm, control a product to limit any physical harm or resulting negative consequence, or supervise another AI system.
📌Examples of "safety function": AI detects a human’s presence near a robot & triggers a “safe stop” or speed reduction to prevent injury; or AI in a train to monitor speed limits & prevent derailments.
📌If “high risk”, the product must go through third-party conformity assessment before it can be put on the market or put in service.
📌An AI system cannot be classed as “low risk” simply if it has a requirement for human involvement; rather human oversight is a prerequisite for any high-risk AI system.
📌People are defined as a “natural person” or a “legal person”, e.g. is an AI system using company data to assess the credit score of a business owner, or is it using personal data to assess a private individual?
📌Firms could argue an AI system only performs a “narrow procedural task”, e.g. transforming unstructured data into structured data, but if the AI makes any kind of value judgement on data, that is high risk.
📌Fascinatingly, the classifications describe "high risk" profiling AI systems to locate a missing child by analysing a neighbourhood’s residents for sex offenders & filtering potential suspects, or monitoring online posts to identify potential extremist affiliation.
📌But police could use “low risk” AI systems to automate admin tasks like scheduling patrol shifts; police website chatbots; automated number plate readers; or for scanning CCTV footage to check for speeding cars.
Have your say here 📢:
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/consultations/targeted-consultation-draft-guidelines-classification-high-risk-artificial-intelligence-systems#AI #AIregulation #technews #EuropeanCommission #techpolicy #EU #technology
-
https://www.europesays.com/people/81064/ OpenAI Wants to Rewrite Its Washington Playbook With ‘Reverse Federalism’ Strategy #AIRegulation #ArtificialIntelligence #SamAltman #TechPolicy #TrumpAdministration
-
https://prismreports.org/2026/05/20/seattle-shield-private-companies-surveillance/
#SeattleShield #GlobalShieldNetwork #InfraGard #Privacy #Surveillance #CivilLiberties #DigitalRights #ICE #PoliceSurveillance #DataPrivacy #FourthAmendment #GovernmentSurveillance #TechPolicy #PrivacyRights #FacialRecognition #CyberSecurity #SPD #Amazon #Facebook #Meta #SeattlePolice #DBIAServices #ABM #ABMSecurityServices #NetSentinal #BlueLeaks
-
https://prismreports.org/2026/05/20/seattle-shield-private-companies-surveillance/
#SeattleShield #GlobalShieldNetwork #InfraGard #Privacy #Surveillance #CivilLiberties #DigitalRights #ICE #PoliceSurveillance #DataPrivacy #FourthAmendment #GovernmentSurveillance #TechPolicy #PrivacyRights #FacialRecognition #CyberSecurity #SPD #Amazon #Facebook #Meta #SeattlePolice #DBIAServices #ABM #ABMSecurityServices #NetSentinal #BlueLeaks
-
https://prismreports.org/2026/05/20/seattle-shield-private-companies-surveillance/
#SeattleShield #GlobalShieldNetwork #InfraGard #Privacy #Surveillance #CivilLiberties #DigitalRights #ICE #PoliceSurveillance #DataPrivacy #FourthAmendment #GovernmentSurveillance #TechPolicy #PrivacyRights #FacialRecognition #CyberSecurity #SPD #Amazon #Facebook #Meta #SeattlePolice #DBIAServices #ABM #ABMSecurityServices #NetSentinal #BlueLeaks
-
https://prismreports.org/2026/05/20/seattle-shield-private-companies-surveillance/
#SeattleShield #GlobalShieldNetwork #InfraGard #Privacy #Surveillance #CivilLiberties #DigitalRights #ICE #PoliceSurveillance #DataPrivacy #FourthAmendment #GovernmentSurveillance #TechPolicy #PrivacyRights #FacialRecognition #CyberSecurity #SPD #Amazon #Facebook #Meta #SeattlePolice #DBIAServices #ABM #ABMSecurityServices #NetSentinal #BlueLeaks
-
https://prismreports.org/2026/05/20/seattle-shield-private-companies-surveillance/
#SeattleShield #GlobalShieldNetwork #InfraGard #Privacy #Surveillance #CivilLiberties #DigitalRights #ICE #PoliceSurveillance #DataPrivacy #FourthAmendment #GovernmentSurveillance #TechPolicy #PrivacyRights #FacialRecognition #CyberSecurity #SPD #Amazon #Facebook #Meta #SeattlePolice #DBIAServices #ABM #ABMSecurityServices #NetSentinal #BlueLeaks
-
TL;DR:
A federal highway bill amendment would cut funding to states and cities unless they shut down automated license plate tracking programs, effectively banning the tech nationwide except for toll collection, over privacy and surveillance concerns.
#Privacy #Surveillance #CivilLiberties #DigitalRights #LicensePlateReaders #ALPR #PoliceSurveillance #DataPrivacy #FourthAmendment #GovernmentSurveillance #TechPolicy #PrivacyRights #FacialRecognition #Cybersecurity #EFF
-
America's Greatest Strategic Blunder: The Imprisonment of Qian Xuesen
#HackerNews #AmericasGreatestBlunder #QianXuesen #Imprisonment #History #Strategy #TechPolicy
-
Last chance to book our FREE webinar Digital ID – reflecting on the UK consultation and what comes next, with Simeon Hanfling, the Deputy Director for Insights and Engagement in the Cabinet Office's Digital ID Task Force and Resham Kotecha, Global Head of Policy, the ODI. This is an opportunity to engage with the emerging policy landscape and help shape what comes next.
https://theodi.org/news-and-events/events/digital-id-reflecting-on-the-uk-consultation-and-what-comes-next/
#DigitalIdentity #DataGovernance #PublicPolicy #UKGov #OpenData #DigitalID #TechPolicy -
Last chance to book our FREE webinar Digital ID – reflecting on the UK consultation and what comes next, with Simeon Hanfling, the Deputy Director for Insights and Engagement in the Cabinet Office's Digital ID Task Force and Resham Kotecha, Global Head of Policy, the ODI. This is an opportunity to engage with the emerging policy landscape and help shape what comes next.
https://theodi.org/news-and-events/events/digital-id-reflecting-on-the-uk-consultation-and-what-comes-next/
#DigitalIdentity #DataGovernance #PublicPolicy #UKGov #OpenData #DigitalID #TechPolicy