home.social

Search

1000 results for “WE_AID”

  1. Can we find $200 in mutual aid tonight please? This is very needed to restore power at the Vulpibus so we can stop burning through our emergency fuel reserves! We also need not to have our food spoiling so fast and not to be spending every day recharging the car to at least have something to keep us warm through the night.

    Cashapp $Athamanatha
    Liberapay.com/Athakitsune
    Paypal @athamanatha
    Ko-fi.com/athakitsune
    Wise, IBAN, ACH and Zelle on request!

    #mutualaid
    #poweroutage
    #emergency
    #urgent
    #solarpower
    #inverter
    #fundraising
    #crowdfund
    #crowdfunding
    #donations
    #pleasedonate
    #currencyhelp
    #fucktrump
    #fucklandlords
    #help
    #helpplease
    #fedihelp
    #lgbtqia
    #lgbtq
    #lgbtqia2s
    #2slgbtqia
    #lgbt
    #trans
    #queer
    #transmutualaid
    #queermutualaid
    #lgbtmutualaid
    #helpfolkssurvive2026
    #communesandconvoys

  2. We are SO close to goal!

    Hello! We have a DV mutual aid request for help with groceries this week. We're at $60/$90. Please RT for reach. 🙂🥰Y'all are brilliant with your support, and it's appreciated.

    C: $Lockdownyourlife
    V: lockdownyourlife
    ko-fi.com/lockdownyourlife

    #tech #infosec #community #mutualaid #safety #food

  3. RE: mastodon.world/@paninid/117497

    Absolutely. Because Trumpism is just the North American Theater of the global , and ALL THE OTHER oligarchs are going to try to contain the STRATEGIC damage TO IT, even as they try to get their masks back on enough not to lose market share over their aid & comfort to the enemy.

    We also need to be watching for what corporatist Democrat leaders pick up the refrain, and target them for their next primaries....

  4. Carved pumpkins for Halloween are cute and all but be warned…

    This Halloween, millions of households around the world will forsake plastic pumpkins for the real thing – especially in the U.S. where carving pumpkins has become somewhat of a pastime during Fall.

    While it is Spring in Australia when Halloween hits, we do have pumpkins available for decoration, carving, etcetera, and you’ll find certain decoration fanatics do insist on carving the real thing. If so, do consider that ‘open’ pumpkins often attract pests, such as spiders, flies, and even mice.

    Decaying pumpkins can be a major attraction for fruit flies as well as squash bugs, which could result in infestation that can be particularly difficult to rectify.

    Here are a few tips to keep these pesty buggers away if carving a pumpkin is on your to-do list this year.

    Lisa Andrews

     

    Keep pumpkins off the ground and elevated
    Putting your pumpkins on raised platforms such as tables helps to limit moisture, which if present, can attract numerous pests.

     

    Clean the pumpkin thoroughly as well as cleaning any other attractants
    Take care to remove all the seeds and pulp inside of the pumpkin, as this will aid in slowing down the decay of the pumpkin which attracts pests. Additionally, be sure to remove other potential food sources, such as sweets that may be left outside, to avoid additional sources of attraction for pests.

     

    Use natural pest deterrents
    Cupboard staples such as spices can be natural deterrents for pests. Cayenne pepper or cinnamon for example, can be sprinkled onto the pumpkins interior and exterior to keep pests at bay.

     

    Consider using alternatives
    Artificial pumpkins can be a great way to decorate for Halloween and get in the spooky spirit even if they usually end up in landfill. At least you’ll be without the risk of attracting pests. And if the landfill bit offends, try using your placcy pumpkin more than once – or better still, get a pumpkin made of ceramic, which is much better for the environment!

     

    ********

     

    Finamill: the final word in fine spice grinding

     

    Going Bananas: we’re seeing a lot of this fabulous ingredient around this season

    That Magical Ingredient: haircare that delivers excellent results thanks to key natural ingredients

    A tribute to Emilio Pucci: the designer who practically invented lifestyle

    Aussie brand Straand take a stand against unhealthy hair

    Great Tech and Lifestyle Upgrades for a Seamless Overseas Holiday

    Australian Museum set to turn time waaaay back with mammoth dinosaur exhibition opening in November

    Bedtime Stories: Let’s get adventurous, honey, let’s get adventurous

    https://creammagazine.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/master_rem-orange-crush-the-final-pre-master-this-is-same-as-version-in-masters-folder.wav

     

    #CREAMMAGAZINE #halloween #howToCarveAPumpkin #POPCULTURE #pumpkinCarving
  5. Annotations to the Image

    Framer Framed, Saturday, October 31 at 03:00 PM GMT+1

    Across histories of militant image-making, annotations have served as instruments of transmission and political instruction; they anchor images within the crucible of struggle and allow them to acquire new meanings as they travel across space and time. An annotation can also be an interruption, an act of reorientation that unsettles what we presume to know or see. On 31 October 2026, as part of the opening weekend of Life After Love: In Search of the Militant Image, participating artists revisit their contributions to the exhibition through walkthroughs, lecture presentations and readings.

    The programme Annotations to the Image features interventions by artists Chaw Ei Thein, Isshaq Albarbary, Sawangwongse Yawnghwe, Haig Aivazian, Hannah Black and Nolan Oswald Dennis, tracing the material conditions and political commitments informing the works on view in the exhibition Life After Love: In Search of the Militant Image.

    Please register here

    Programme

    15:00 Artists’ Street: A Walking Tour with Chaw Ei Thein
    16:00 The making of Kharajat (She Went Out) with Isshaq Albarbary
    17:00 The making of People’s Defence Force I–X with Sawangwongse Yawnghwe
    18:00 Readings by Haig Aivazian, Hannah Black and Nolan Oswald Dennis

    Artists’ Street: A Walking Tour with Chaw Ei Thein
    Join Chaw Ei Thein for a walking tour through Artists’ Street, her installation of thirty-eight hand-sewn textile figures that reconstruct scenes of artistic protest against military rule in Myanmar, from the student demonstrations of 1996 through the 2007 Saffron Revolution to the aftermath of the 2021 coup. Moving from figure to figure, the artist tells the stories behind each scene, some she witnessed, others passed to her through orality and scattered documentation. The dolls form an archive of street performance that exists almost nowhere else, a record of coded gestures, staged interruptions and small public absurdities improvised against censorship and violence. Light enough to travel in a bag, they follow the path of the exiled.

    The making of Kharajat (She Went Out) with Isshaq Albarbary
    Isshaq Albarbary retraces the making of Kharajat (She Went Out), his film co-commissioned for Life After Love. The work takes as its starting point two recordings of Israeli mustaʿribīn, undercover units who disguise themselves as Palestinians. In 2015, security cameras at a hospital in al-Khalil captured a unit entering the premises, one member disguised as a woman in labour, another pushed in a wheelchair. In 2017, handheld cameras at Bethlehem’s northern entrance recorded plain-clothes men pulling on balaclavas and seizing Palestinian protesters. Woven through the film is a new muwashshaḥ, written by Albarbary and his twin brother after an anonymous Andalusian original, and composed and sung by Maya Khalidi. Albarbary draws on tanaaqush, an Arabic term that brings together the acts of engraving and argument, to explore how images leave their marks on one another. This exchange also informs his wider engagement with the histories and inheritances of stateless refugees.

    The making of People’s Defence Force I–X with Sawangwongse Yawnghwe
    Sawangwongse Yawnghwe presents People’s Defence Force I–X, a series of paintings made in the wake of Burma’s 2021 Spring Revolution. Drawing on the stories and images of protesters, the series considers what Frantz Fanon and Zahi Zalloua might describe as a form of symbolic suicide, when individuals relinquish their established identities and enter a radically different political existence. For many, this transformation meant fleeing to the jungle and taking up arms, either by joining the newly formed People’s Defence Forces (PDFs) or by allying themselves with established ethnic armed organisations. Yawnghwe situates these paintings within a longer history of uprisings against military rule, in which his own family participated, and returns to a question that runs through his work: Which way to land?

    Readings by Haig Aivazian, Hannah Black and Nolan Oswald Dennis
    Haig Aivazian, Hannah Black, and Nolan Oswald Dennis bring together a selection of texts and reflections that extend their contributions to Life After Love. They move between artistic research and polemical expression to consider the image’s relationship to political education.

    Curated by Hera Chan and Edwin Nasr, the exhibition Life After Love: In Search of the Militant Image asks what the changing forms of political struggle reveal about the changing forms of image-making. If the militant image of the twentieth century emerged alongside mass party politics, anti-colonial liberation movements and the project of revolutionary cinema, what becomes of that tradition within a conjuncture shaped by digital platforms, algorithmic circulation and decentralised forms of political organising?

    The exhibition approaches the militant image as a historical category, which has always depended upon particular forms of mediation. Earlier traditions of militant image-making were sustained by formations capable of producing and circulating images in the name of a collective political subject. Their ambitions were inseparable from the infrastructures through which they moved and the revolutionary horizons they sought to cultivate.

    Contemporary uprisings unfold under markedly different terms. Images now circulate across encrypted messaging applications, social media feeds and informal digital networks whose logics reshape our visibility and attention. Often produced by those embedded within the events themselves, they move rapidly between testimony, tactical communication and affective expression. Their aesthetic form bears the imprint of the political moment from which they emerge: anonymity, spontaneity and opacity become qualities inscribed within the images.

    Rather than asking whether the militant image survives in the present, Life After Love asks how its political function has been transformed, and what this transformation discloses about the actuality of struggle. The works assembled here reflect upon the conditions through which images are produced, circulated, appropriated and contested. Many emerge from practices situated alongside political organising, mutual aid and community work, where cultural production unfolds in close proximity to lived struggle and the imperative of internationalist solidarity. Taken together, they invite viewers to consider the militant image in the present tense and the forms through which emancipatory futures become thinkable.

    Info & Credits

    This event is in English.

    Admission is free, pay what you can. Do you also think art should be free and accessible? Please consider supporting us with a donation when registering or by becoming a Framer Framed Friend!

    For seated programmes, places are always made available for wheelchair users. Please speak to the host before the programme begins.

    This event may be photographed and filmed. Kindly let us know in advance if you prefer not to have your picture taken.

    Framer Framed is supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science; Amsterdam Fund for the Arts; and Municipality of Amsterdam.

    Location

    Framer Framed
    Oranje-Vrijstaatkade 71
    1093KS, Amsterdam

    offbeat.amsterdam/event/annota

  6. Disability News This Week – Triangle Housing, Education and Accessibility Headlines From Around the Internet | October 16–22, 2026

    This week’s disability news highlights independent living in the Triangle, special education in public schools, and technology designed to support autism evaluations. Advocates are also drawing attention to barriers that keep assistive technology out of reach.

    Here is DoRaleigh.com’s roundup of disability news and headlines from around the internet.


    Triangle Housing Pilots Expand Independent Living Options

    North Carolina Health News | October 16, 2026

    Supportive housing pilots in Raleigh, Durham and Chapel Hill are offering adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities more opportunities to live independently.

    North Carolina Health News reports that HOPE North Carolina’s projects pair housing with community facilitators who help residents navigate everyday needs and build connections. Raleigh’s Grosvenor Gardens includes 10 apartments designated for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. 

    For Triangle residents, these projects offer local examples of how housing and support services can work together to expand personal choice.

    Read the full housing report⁠.

    Nearly One in Five Public School Students Has an IEP or 504 Plan

    Disability Scoop | October 19, 2026

    Disability Scoop reports that nearly one in five public school students has an Individualized Education Program, or IEP, or a Section 504 plan. The report also highlights disparities involving restraint and seclusion for students with disabilities. 

    The coverage puts school support, accommodations and student safety at the center of the national education conversation.

    Read the Disability Scoop report⁠.

    Autism Assessment Technology Receives National Attention

    Disability Scoop coverage | October 20, 2026

    A tool designed to assist clinicians with autism diagnosis drew coverage this week. The FDA’s database confirms that Neurora, developed by Argus Cognitive, received clearance on October 2, 2026. Its developer describes it as an aid for health professionals assessing autism, with diagnosis remaining the clinician’s responsibility. 

    The clearance occurred earlier this month; this week’s reporting brings renewed attention to technology’s role in autism evaluations.

    View the FDA clearance record⁠.

    New Report Examines Barriers to Assistive Technology

    European Disability Forum | October 22, 2026

    A new European Disability Forum paper says inconsistent funding and national rules prevent people with disabilities from obtaining necessary assistive technology.

    The organization identifies restricted product choices, insufficient funding, gaps in expert advice and inadequate maintenance support. It also warns that people can lose access to familiar technology when moving between European Union countries. 

    The report underscores a broader accessibility concern: obtaining a device is only part of the equation. Affordability, repairs, updates and ongoing support also affect whether people can use it.

    Read the European Disability Forum update⁠.

    Disability Advocate Honored for Decades of Leadership

    State of Delaware News | October 21, 2026

    Delaware’s State Council for Persons with Disabilities recognized Emmanuel Jenkins with its 2026 Mary Custis Straughn “Custie” Award during an October 19 conference.

    Jenkins, community relations officer for the Delaware Developmental Disabilities Council and founder of We Stand 4 Something, was honored for more than 20 years of advocacy and for helping others develop their voices. The conference coincided with Invisible Disabilities Week, observed October 18–24. 

    Read the Delaware announcement⁠.

    Why These Stories Matter in Raleigh

    For Raleigh and Triangle readers, these headlines raise practical questions about community inclusion: Are there enough housing choices? Are students receiving adequate support? Can people obtain and maintain the technology that supports daily life?

    The Triangle housing pilots bring those questions close to home, offering local examples to follow as communities consider ways to support greater independence.

    Follow DoRaleigh.com for daily updates on government meetings, local festivals, and community happenings — your one-stop guide to everything Raleigh!

    Connect With Us: Instagram | Facebook | BSky | Linkedin

    Share With Us: Post your community News, Events, on our Submissions Page.

    Advertise With Us: Interested in Advertising click here.

    Published by Bryan Tomlinson

    Design, Optimization, and Marketing Services Provided by BTDesigns.pro 

    #Accessibility #AssistiveTechnology #Autism #CommunityInclusion #DisabilityNews #DisabilityRights #IEP #IndependentLiving #InvisibleDisabilities #News #NorthCarolina #raleigh #Section504 #SpecialEducation #SupportiveHousing #TriangleNC
  7. DATE: October 23, 2026 at 10:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Testosterone may help new brain cells survive, and timing could matter

    URL: psypost.org/testosterone-may-h

    New research in male rats suggests that the timing and duration of testosterone exposure may influence whether newly born brain cells survive to maturity. The study, published in Neuroscience, indicates that testosterone may be most effective at boosting the survival of young neurons during the later stages of their development, particularly within a part of the hippocampus involved in spatial learning and memory. These findings offer new insight into how male sex hormones support brain plasticity in adulthood.

    Adult neurogenesis is the biological process by which the mature brain generates new functional nerve cells, or neurons, from dividing stem cells. This process takes place largely inside the hippocampus, a seahorse-shaped structure located deep within the brain’s temporal lobe that is essential for learning, memory formation, and stress regulation. Specifically, new cells are born along a thin band of tissue called the subgranular zone, located within a subregion of the hippocampus known as the dentate gyrus.

    Once these precursor cells divide, they migrate into the neighboring granule cell layer and begin extending communication fibers to other parts of the hippocampus. Over several weeks, the surviving cells mature into functional neurons that are highly excitable and adaptable, helping the brain form new circuits and store new memories. However, roughly half of all newly generated cells in the hippocampus naturally die off within the first month before they can fully integrate into the brain’s network.

    Hormones are among the major internal factors that regulate how many of these young cells survive. Testosterone, the primary male sex hormone, naturally declines as men age, and low circulating levels of the hormone are associated with an elevated risk of age-related memory decline and dementia, although results from clinical trials testing testosterone treatment for memory in older men have been mixed. In the body and brain, testosterone can act directly on androgen receptors or be converted by enzymes into other active hormones, such as estradiol, a form of estrogen, or dihydrotestosterone, a potent androgen.

    “Growing clinical evidence has shown that testosterone can improve or sustain memory in aging men, potentially reducing the risk and severity of age-related memory loss, including Alzheimer’s disease,” senior study author Mark D. Spritzer, a professor of biology at Middlebury College, told PsyPost. “One mechanism by which testosterone may be having these effects is by acting as a neuroprotectant in the brain. The hippocampus is a region of the brain that is essential for learning and memory, and it is an area that degrades with age.”

    Previous experiments in male rats have shown that removing the testes, and with them the main source of testosterone, does not change the rate at which new hippocampal cells are born, but it substantially reduces how many of those new cells survive. Restoring testosterone through daily injections for 30 consecutive days reliably rescues these young neurons. In contrast, several studies using shorter treatment windows of 15 to 21 days found no benefit for cell survival, while a recent experiment by the same research group showed that a brief five-day burst of testosterone given between days 11 and 15 after cell birth did improve survival.

    This pattern raised questions about whether testosterone needs to build up over a full month to protect new neurons, or if young cells are simply more sensitive to the hormone during specific developmental stages. Between 11 and 30 days after birth, maturing neurons go through a sensitive window where they begin forming active connections, or synapses, with other brain regions. During this same timeframe, chemical signals from a neurotransmitter called GABA shift from exciting the young cells to inhibiting them, a transition that promotes proper maturation.

    “We had previously shown that testosterone injections can improve levels of adult neurogenesis (proliferation and maturation of new neurons) within the hippocampus,” Spritzer explained. “However, we did not know whether or not specific periods of neuron development were more strongly influenced by testosterone. Therefore, the current experiment involved giving rats testosterone during different stages of neural development to assess the effects on adult neurogenesis. The ultimate goal is to better understand how testosterone influences the brain and cognition.”

    To resolve the contradictions in earlier work, Spritzer, lead author Tatum W. Hamilton, and their colleagues at Middlebury College designed an experiment to test how different windows of testosterone exposure affect neuron survival at 30 days of age. They directly compared a full 30-day treatment against two 15-day treatments covering either the first half or the second half of the cells’ 30-day maturation period.

    The researchers worked with 43 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats that were approximately 60 days old at the start of the study. All rats were housed individually to control for social variables, as prior work showed that testosterone’s effects on the brain are easier to detect in individually housed animals. One week after arriving at the laboratory, all of the rats underwent surgical castration to remove their natural source of testosterone, allowing the scientists to precisely control hormone levels through injections.

    Eleven days after surgery, every rat received a single abdominal injection of bromodeoxyuridine, a synthetic compound commonly known as BrdU. When cells divide, they incorporate BrdU into their newly synthesized DNA, which permanently tags the exact batch of cells born during the brief window after the injection. By waiting 30 days and then counting how many BrdU-tagged cells remain in the brain, scientists can measure the survival rate of that specific generation of cells.

    Starting the day after the BrdU injection, the rats were divided into six groups of six to eight animals each. Half of the groups received daily injections of testosterone propionate at a high physiological dose of 0.500 milligrams per rat; earlier work by the same group found that a lower dose of 0.125 milligrams had no effect on new neuron survival. The other half received inert sesame oil injections as a comparison control. These injections were administered during one of three time windows following the BrdU tag: an early period (days 1 to 15), a late period (days 16 to 30), or the full period (days 1 to 30).

    On day 31, the researchers collected blood samples to verify hormone levels and extracted the rats’ brains for microscopic analysis. They sliced the entire hippocampus into thin sections and used chemical staining techniques to make the BrdU-tagged cells visible under a light microscope. A researcher who was blinded to which treatment each rat received counted the labeled cells across the granule cell layer and subgranular zone, as well as in an adjacent area called the hilus to check whether any changes were specific to the neurogenic zone.

    The team also divided their cell counts between the dorsal (top/front) and ventral (bottom/back) portions of the dentate gyrus, because these two zones serve different functions. The dorsal hippocampus is primarily involved in spatial navigation and memory, whereas the ventral hippocampus mainly regulates stress and anxiety. Finally, using a laser-scanning confocal microscope and fluorescent markers, the researchers examined 50 randomly selected BrdU-tagged cells per rat to see how many also contained NeuN, a nuclear protein found in mature neurons.

    Blood tests confirmed that rats receiving testosterone during the late period and the full 30-day period had elevated serum testosterone concentrations at the end of the experiment, averaging about 5.7 nanograms per milliliter, compared to less than 0.3 nanograms per milliliter in the oil-treated groups and the early-period testosterone group, which had stopped receiving hormone injections 16 days earlier.

    Across the entire dentate gyrus, rats treated with testosterone had higher numbers of surviving BrdU-labeled cells in the neurogenic zone than rats given oil. Planned statistical comparisons between the hormone and oil groups within each time window showed that only the full 30-day testosterone treatment produced a statistically significant increase across the whole structure. Rats given testosterone during the late window (days 16 to 30) showed a trend toward higher cell survival across the whole dentate gyrus that fell just short of statistical significance, while early treatment (days 1 to 15) had no effect.

    “The results suggest that testosterone may have an additive effect, which is a novel finding,” Spritzer noted. “Namely, longer exposure to testosterone increased neurogenesis to a greater degree.”

    When the researchers examined the dorsal and ventral regions separately, a more specific pattern emerged. In the dorsal dentate gyrus, testosterone increased cell survival in both the full 30-day group and the late 16-to-30-day group, while the early 1-to-15-day group showed no benefit over oil injections. In the ventral dentate gyrus, testosterone had no effect on cell survival during any of the three treatment windows, although rats injected during the early period unexpectedly had fewer surviving cells in this region than rats injected during the late or full periods regardless of whether they received hormone or oil.

    Fluorescent microscopy confirmed that roughly 79 to 87 percent of the surviving BrdU-tagged cells had matured into NeuN-positive neurons across all groups, regardless of whether the rats received testosterone or oil. Because the hormone did not alter the proportion of new cells that became neurons, the higher BrdU counts can be read as a greater number of surviving new neurons. No treatment differences were found in the overall tissue volume of the dentate gyrus or in cell counts within the neighboring hilus region.

    Together, these results suggest that maturing neurons in the dorsal hippocampus are especially responsive to testosterone when they are between two and four weeks old. Because the dorsal hippocampus governs spatial learning, the authors note that this regional sensitivity aligns with past behavioral experiments showing that testosterone improves spatial working memory in male rats. The hormone may help preserve new cells during this late window by blocking programmed cell death, boosting supportive growth proteins like brain-derived neurotrophic factor, or aiding the transition of GABA signals as young neurons wire into existing brain circuits.

    “We demonstrated that testosterone enhances adult neurogenesis, with the effects being strongest during the later stages of neuronal development,” Spritzer said. “These results suggest that testosterone may be a useful therapeutic target for helping to sustain neuroplasticity, among men in particular.”

    There are a few things to keep in mind when interpreting these findings. First, the experiment was conducted in surgically castrated young adult rats housed in social isolation, which does not mirror the gradual, partial hormone decline experienced by aging men in daily life. Second, the blood and brain tissue were collected 24 hours after the final testosterone injection for the full and late groups, but 16 days after the final injection for the early group. The authors raise the possibility that this gap helps explain why early treatment showed no benefit, but note that this explanation would require new cells to die off at a steady rate throughout development, which earlier research does not support.

    “This was preclinical research conducted with rats, so it cannot be extrapolated directly to humans,” Spritzer cautioned. “However, it is suggestive that testosterone may have therapeutic value. Of importance was that we used a high physiological dose of testosterone, and the effects of dose levels have not been considered carefully in past human clinical studies involving testosterone.”

    Spritzer also pointed out that boosting cell survival without limit is not necessarily the goal. “One challenge with neurogenesis research is the assumption that more is always better,” he added. “There is likely an optimal level of adult neurogenesis for best brain functioning.”

    In addition, the overall statistical analysis did not show that testosterone’s effect differed across the three time windows, so the conclusions about timing rest on separate comparisons within each window, each involving only six to eight rats per group. The study also did not directly measure the molecular pathways inside the cells, so it remains uncertain whether testosterone acted through androgen receptors, estrogen receptors, or downstream growth factors during that 16-to-30-day window. Nor did it test whether the extra neurons translated into better learning or memory. Future research will need to test these specific molecular mechanisms and examine whether similar timing effects apply to older animals or females.

    “Now that we know more about the stages of neural development that are influenced by testosterone, assessing the molecular mechanism will be important,” Spritzer said. “Testosterone is metabolized in the brain and likely has many effects on neuronal development, which should be explored.”

    The study, “Effects of testosterone upon the survival of new neurons in the dentate gyrus of adult male rats,” was authored by Tatum W. Hamilton, Ezra J. LeMole, Grace K. Nadecki, Jordan M. Gardner, Quinn P. Kennedy, Kathryn A. Blek, and Mark D. Spritzer.

    URL: psypost.org/testosterone-may-h

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Testosterone #BrainHealth #Neuroscience #Neurogenesis #BrainPlasticity #Hippocampus #Memory #MentalHealth #Neurobiology #ScienceNews

  8. Introduction


    On October 21st, at 07:41 UTC, Chainguard unilaterally breached a coordinated disclosure embargo by releasing a PHP security patch more than six hours ahead of the agreed schedule. This premature disclosure exposed critical vulnerabilities in cybersecurity collaboration, undermining weeks of meticulous coordination among stakeholders to synchronize vulnerability disclosure. The PHP community, which had shared the patch with distributors like Chainguard under strict embargo terms, sharply criticized the company for jeopardizing the security of a significant portion of the web. By releasing the patch prematurely, Chainguard enabled malicious actors to analyze the binary fix before widespread deployment, creating an exploitable window.

    The causal mechanism of risk escalation is clear: Chainguard’s embargo breach introduced a temporal disparity between the patch’s public availability and its deployment by end-users. This gap provided attackers with a critical opportunity to reverse-engineer the patch, pinpoint the underlying vulnerability, and develop targeted exploits. During this interim period, PHP users remained unprotected, as the official disclosure—intended to align with patch availability—was delayed. This misalignment significantly heightened the risk of exploitation, effectively nullifying the protective purpose of coordinated disclosure protocols.

    This incident exposes systemic vulnerabilities in the enforcement of cybersecurity embargoes. Unlike legal embargoes, which are backed by enforceable penalties, coordinated disclosures in the tech industry depend on trust and voluntary compliance. Chainguard’s actions underscore the absence of formal repercussions for violations, revealing a system susceptible to conflicts of interest—such as distributors prioritizing their own user base over the broader ecosystem. Without robust deterrents, such breaches risk becoming normalized, eroding trust among researchers, distributors, and users. This erosion threatens to fragment the unified response to critical vulnerabilities, leaving the global web infrastructure increasingly vulnerable to rapid, large-scale exploitation.

    The implications are stark: if coordinated disclosure processes fail, the global web infrastructure becomes more susceptible to widespread, rapid exploitation. This incident highlights the urgent need for stricter adherence to embargo protocols and the establishment of clear, enforceable consequences for violations. Strengthening these mechanisms is essential to ensure that collaborative security efforts are not compromised by individual actors, thereby safeguarding the integrity of vulnerability management practices.

    The Security Patch and Coordinated Disclosure


    In cybersecurity, coordinated disclosure serves as the cornerstone of responsible vulnerability management. This process is a meticulously timed sequence where researchers, developers, and distributors align the release of security patches with the public disclosure of vulnerabilities. The objective is clear: to provide users with a critical window to update their systems before malicious actors can exploit identified flaws. This mechanism operates as a high-stakes race against time, where adherence to agreed timelines is paramount—deviations can precipitate catastrophic outcomes.

    Chainguard’s Breach of Protocol


    On October 21st at 07:41 UTC, Chainguard unilaterally released a PHP security patch six hours ahead of the agreed embargo, constituting a critical failure in the coordinated disclosure process. This breach unfolded through the following mechanism:

    • Premature Release: Chainguard published container images incorporating the fix, rendering the binary patch publicly accessible. This action inadvertently exposed the technical specifics of the patch to any entity capable of reverse-engineering the binary.
    • Temporal Discrepancy: While Chainguard’s users could theoretically update immediately, the broader PHP user base remained in a state of vulnerability, awaiting the official release. This disparity created a critical exploitation window, during which attackers could analyze the patch to deduce the underlying vulnerability.
    • Exploit Development Pipeline: Attackers leveraged the prematurely released binary to reverse-engineer the patch, employing techniques such as disassembly, code differential analysis, and vulnerability mapping. This systematic process, accelerated by early access, enabled the rapid development of targeted exploits prior to widespread patch deployment.


    The Causal Chain of Risk Amplification


    Chainguard’s actions initiated a cascading sequence of events:

    1. Initial Exposure: The premature release provided attackers with actionable intelligence on the patch.
    2. Exploit Engineering: Attackers exploited the temporal gap to reverse-engineer the binary, pinpointing the vulnerability through code analysis.
    3. Operational Impact: PHP users remained unprotected during this interim period, substantially elevating the probability of successful exploitation.

    This sequence is not speculative. In cybersecurity, time is a quantifiable resource—each hour gained by attackers corresponds directly to increased user exposure. Chainguard’s breach effectively granted attackers a tactical advantage, nullifying weeks of coordinated preparatory efforts.

    Systemic Implications and Structural Vulnerabilities


    Chainguard’s actions underscore a fundamental weakness in cybersecurity embargoes: the absence of enforceable penalties. Coordinated disclosure operates on a framework of trust and voluntary compliance, rendering it susceptible to organizational priorities. Key implications include:

    • Conflicting Incentives: Chainguard’s decision to prioritize its user base compromised the integrity of the broader disclosure process. This analogy holds: a single malfunctioning component in a complex system can induce systemic failure, analogous to a gear jamming in machinery.
    • Erosion of Trust: Repeated breaches of protocol undermine confidence among researchers, distributors, and end-users. Such fragmentation debilitates collaborative security initiatives, increasing the susceptibility of global web infrastructure to large-scale attacks.

    The conclusion is unequivocal: coordinated disclosure is not merely procedural—it is a critical mechanical safeguard for global cybersecurity. Violations of this protocol do not merely bend rules; they destabilize the entire system. To safeguard digital infrastructure, stricter adherence to protocols and tangible consequences for non-compliance are imperative. Absent these measures, we jeopardize not just individual patches, but the resilience of the entire global network.

    Impact and Reactions


    Chainguard’s unauthorized release of a PHP security patch on October 21st at 07:41 UTC—six hours and eleven minutes ahead of the coordinated disclosure schedule—directly compromised the integrity of global vulnerability management. This breach not only violated established cybersecurity protocols but also triggered a cascade of technical and systemic consequences, exposing millions of PHP users to heightened risk. The following analysis dissects the immediate and long-term ramifications of this action.

    Immediate Technical Consequences


    Upon Chainguard’s release of the binary patch, malicious actors gained a critical window to exploit the vulnerability. The reverse-engineering process—which involves disassembling the binary into machine code, performing differential analysis against prior versions, and mapping code changes to identify patched vulnerabilities—was accelerated. Mechanistically, this process mirrors forensic code analysis, enabling attackers to reconstruct the vulnerability’s root cause with precision. The temporal gap between Chainguard’s release and the official disclosure provided attackers with a tactical advantage, allowing them to develop and deploy exploits before the majority of PHP users could apply the patch. This scenario is analogous to a security breach in which an adversary gains access to a system’s blueprints while its defenses remain unactivated.

    Reactions from the PHP Community and Experts


    • PHP Core Team’s Response: The PHP Core Team issued a public condemnation, stating that Chainguard’s actions “jeopardized the security of a significant portion of the web.” Their criticism highlights the erosion of a months-long coordinated effort involving researchers, developers, and distributors, which aimed to minimize exposure during the patching window.
    • Security Experts’ Analysis: Cybersecurity experts characterized the breach as a “critical failure of trust mechanisms.” Coordinated disclosure relies on voluntary adherence to embargoes, as enforceable penalties are rarely codified. Chainguard’s violation exposed this vulnerability in the system, akin to a safety protocol failing due to non-compliance with established standards.
    • User Reactions: Affected users reported confusion and frustration. Chainguard’s user base, which updated prematurely, created a security fragmentation issue, leaving non-Chainguard PHP installations unprotected. This parallels a public health scenario in which only a subset of the population receives a vaccine, increasing collective risk through uneven protection.


    Long-Term Implications


    If such breaches become normalized, the coordinated disclosure framework risks collapse. This erosion of trust manifests in the following systemic consequences:

    • Delayed Patch Releases: Researchers and distributors may withhold advance information to prevent misuse, delaying critical updates. This parallels a supply chain disruption, where bottlenecks impede the flow of essential resources.
    • Prolonged Exploitation Windows: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities for extended periods as the gap between discovery and patching widens. This is analogous to a structural failure in a dam, where a small crack, left unaddressed, leads to catastrophic collapse.
    • Fragmented Security Response: Stakeholders prioritize individual interests over collective security, resulting in a patchwork of protections. This mirrors a decentralized emergency response system, where some areas receive aid while others remain vulnerable.


    Mechanisms of Risk Amplification


    The risk amplification resulting from Chainguard’s actions can be modeled as a causal chain:

    1. Initial Exposure: Premature release provides attackers with actionable intelligence, equivalent to disclosing the location of vulnerabilities in a system.
    2. Exploit Development: The temporal gap enables attackers to reverse-engineer the patch, identify vulnerabilities, and engineer exploits. This stage is comparable to a thief analyzing a security system’s weaknesses before executing a breach.
    3. Operational Impact: Unpatched PHP users face elevated risk during the interim period, as attackers exploit vulnerabilities before widespread protection is achieved. This is analogous to leaving critical infrastructure unsecured during a known threat window.


    Practical Insights


    Chainguard’s breach underscores the necessity of enforceable consequences for cybersecurity embargo violations. Without penalties—whether legal, financial, or reputational—organizations may prioritize narrow interests over collective security, akin to disregarding traffic laws for personal convenience. Strengthening protocols to include binding enforcement mechanisms is essential to safeguarding global web infrastructure. In cybersecurity, time is a quantifiable resource; its misuse through protocol violations directly correlates with increased user exposure. Addressing this gap requires systemic reforms to restore trust and ensure compliance with coordinated disclosure frameworks.

    Lessons Learned and Strategic Reforms


    Chainguard’s unauthorized release of a PHP security patch prior to the agreed disclosure timeline underscores the fragility of coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD) mechanisms. This incident not only exposed systemic weaknesses in embargo enforcement but also amplified the risk landscape for millions of PHP users. The following analysis distills critical insights and proposes actionable reforms to fortify global cybersecurity practices.

    Critical Insights


    • Embargo Integrity Depends on Deterrence, Not Trust Alone: The absence of enforceable penalties for embargo violations renders CVD frameworks vulnerable to unilateral breaches. Chainguard’s actions illustrate how organizational incentives can supersede collective security interests, creating a critical temporal asymmetry between patch availability and user adoption. This window enables adversaries to reverse-engineer patches, identify vulnerabilities, and weaponize exploits before widespread mitigation is achieved.
    • Temporal Exploitation as a Quantifiable Threat Vector: In the cybersecurity domain, time is a non-renewable resource. Chainguard’s premature release granted attackers a 6-hour head start, sufficient to disassemble binaries, conduct differential analysis, and correlate code changes to underlying vulnerabilities. This accelerated the exploit development lifecycle, directly exacerbating risk for unpatched systems.
    • Trust Erosion as a Catalyst for Fragmentation: Protocol violations fragment the collaborative ecosystem. When entities prioritize proprietary user bases over CVD commitments, trust among researchers, developers, and users deteriorates. This fragmentation compromises the integrity of vulnerability management pipelines, resulting in delayed patch propagation and extended exploitation windows.


    Strategic Reforms


    • Institutionalizing Deterrence Mechanisms: Establish legally binding, financial, or reputational penalties for embargo violations. For example, violators could face contractual fines, exclusion from pre-disclosure programs, or public censure. Such measures would recalibrate cost-benefit analyses, disincentivizing breaches.
    • Standardizing Embargo Protocols: Eliminate ambiguity in CVD terms by codifying timelines, responsibilities, and consequences. A unified framework reduces misinterpretation and ensures all stakeholders operate under identical constraints, minimizing unintentional breaches.
    • Engineering Enforcement Through Technology: Deploy centralized, time-locked patch distribution systems to eliminate unilateral release capabilities. Such architectures enforce synchronized disclosure, neutralizing the ability to circumvent embargoes.
    • Aligning Incentives with Collective Security: Reframe compliance as a strategic imperative by quantifying the long-term benefits of CVD—reduced exploitation risk, enhanced community trust, and reputational capital—relative to short-term gains from premature releases.


    Proactive Mitigation Strategies


    To preempt future breaches, the cybersecurity community must address the root causes of embargo violations through systemic, educational, and technical interventions:

    • Governance Overhaul: Implement a regulatory framework for CVD that balances rapid patch deployment with collective security imperatives. This framework should include enforceable rules, independent oversight, and accountability mechanisms.
    • Risk Literacy Campaigns: Educate stakeholders on the causal chain of embargo breaches: premature release → accelerated reverse-engineering → expedited exploit development → heightened user risk. Awareness is a prerequisite for behavioral change.
    • Technological Hardening: Invest in patch obfuscation, encrypted distribution, and anti-tamper technologies to increase the cost and complexity of reverse-engineering, thereby delaying exploit development.

    Chainguard’s breach serves as a critical inflection point for the cybersecurity community. By addressing the structural vulnerabilities exposed in this incident, we can reinforce CVD frameworks, safeguard global web infrastructure, and ensure that time—a decisive factor in cybersecurity—is not weaponized against users. The path forward demands not just technical innovation, but a recalibration of norms, incentives, and governance to prioritize collective resilience over individual expediency.#cybersecurity #embargo #vulnerability #exploitation #software #coding #development #engineering #inclusive #community
    Chainguard's Premature PHP Patch Release Undermines Coordinated Disclosure, Increases Risk for Users

  9. We're looking at data about the Mars Rover sample collection! We got positions based on dates in sols, and then we can use matplotlib to plot the rover's traversal. We can also use HiRISE to map the position as the Rover travels across Three Forks! - Andrew Annex at

  10. We had a more exciting end to the evening than expected. As we left one of my favorite restaurants just off of Plaça de Catalunya, we saw streets blocked off with police in riot gear, people running away from something, and something on fire. We went the other way & are back in our hotel room now. 🙄

  11. We know drones are reshaping modern warfare. Could dogs be next? @Techcrunch has more on Warhound, a new venture that would genetically engineer war dogs for the U.S. military and take on tasks that are dangerous for humans or difficult for machines, such as bomb detection, searches, and other specialized operations:

    flip.it/1ri.j5

    #Tech #War #Technology

  12. 'We want 10!' - Inside delirious Liverpool away end as Man Utd humiliated at Old Trafford
    liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/foot
    It was on this day five years ago that Liverpool rocked up at Old Trafford and humbled and embarrassed Manchester United 5-0 in their own backyard #LFC #YNWA #Barclay'sPremierLeague #ManchesterUnitedFC #MohamedSalah #LiverpoolFC #JurgenKlopp #NabyKeita #DiogoJota

  13. We're back from the morning break and @treyhunner is sharing everything we don't need to know about classes!

    First, we played "Function or Class!" to experience for ourselves that functions and classes in Python don't quite consistently divide how you expect.

    Calling a method, though, is calling a function on a class.

    You can do some pythonicism crimes to write Java class definitions with Python. Every method call translates through the class, though.

  14. We pay for five streaming services just to watch the same show on all of them.

    #memes #meme #dad #dadlife #ParentingHumor

  15. We are actually officially using the hashtag for , so if you're seeing this on the other one, come find us on the official one!

  16. We just attempted walkies in Storm Boelo. Abbie just took one look at the weather, walked out the door to the nearest patch of lawn, arched her back and made a poop on it, then headed straight back inside before I could even get a photo of her cute raincoat.

  17. We are still looking for PHP developers who are interested in helping to shape the future of the amiga-news.de platform. Anyone familiar with PHP 7.3+ (without ORM or a framework), SQL for MariaDB, Composer, Phing, PHPUnit, and Behat - and who finds the idea of adapting our content management system to modern requirements an appealing challenge - is cordially invited to get in touch with us.

    amiga-news.de/en/news/AN-2026-

  18. We found a small square off of the beaten path for patatas bravas and fancy sangria in Barcelona.

  19. We can’t at all.
    “How Long Can We Tolerate Elon Musk Deciding Our Elections and Foreign Policy?

    As of this writing, Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and first trillionaire, has pumped more than $445 million into the midterms in an attempt to strengthen the Republicans’ chances of winning”
    open.substack.com/pub/america/

  20. "We haven’t seen a significant counterfactual contribution from AI to net global cybersecurity damages since 2022 / ChatGPT. But that doesn’t mean AI won’t transform cybercrime and cyber conflict and eventually lead to catastrophic damages. The apocalypse, I think, will be slow-moving.

    I read a book about “cryptoviruses” in 2008, but it took 5-8 years for ransomware to become a huge deal. And ransomware eventually did hundreds of billions in damages, thanks to geopolitical conditions that let gangs sufficiently avoid law enforcement, a global political economy that pushed young people in the former USSR toward crime over formal software jobs, the rise of crypto payment rails, and the like. Likewise, “Cyber Pearl Harbor” was popularized in 2012, but it wasn’t until 2017 (NotPetya, Russia against Ukraine) that we saw a nation-state attack that significantly disrupted another national economy.

    It’s our job, those of us in AI safety, AI security, and security, to anticipate bad cases, work out possible futures today, and start preventing them. The cases I’m worried about: nation-states developing agent-swarm capabilities that do 10-100x the damage of previous nation-state attacks; worms released by ideologically motivated actors that self-replicate, damage Internet availability, and cause enormous downstream harm; and new criminal innovation that substantially automates criminal workflows."

    joshuasaxe181906.substack.com/

    #CyberSecurity #AISafety #AI #GenerativeAI #LLMs

  21. We're set for a super Saturday in Austin ⏰🇺🇸

    #HaasF1 #F1 #USGP

  22. We have AI tools that can write code, summarize documents, generate ideas, and answer almost any question.

    But there is still a problem I keep thinking about:

    AI can help us figure out what to do. But what helps us actually do it?

    You can ask an AI to create a study plan, build a roadmap for your startup, or organize your daily routine. The response might be excellent.

    Then real life happens.

    You miss a deadline. You get distracted. A task becomes more complicated than expected. Your original plan stops making sense.

    And suddenly, that beautifully generated plan becomes another forgotten document.

    That got me thinking about a different kind of AI-powered product.

    Introducing Cometflow LifeOS

    Cometflow LifeOS, by Cometflow Space, is built around one simple idea:

    Intent → Reality.

    Instead of treating AI as a place where you only ask questions, imagine an experience designed around turning intentions into real, trackable progress.

    You start with something you want to accomplish.

    For example:

    • Learn web development.
    • Prepare for an important exam.
    • Launch a small project.
    • Build a consistent daily routine.
    • Turn an idea into a working product.

    The goal isn't just to generate a list of tasks. It's to help connect the goal with the steps, resources, deadlines, and follow-ups needed to move forward.

    The idea behind LifeOS

    I'm exploring three connected concepts.

    1. The Intent Graph

    A goal rarely exists on its own.

    Launching a website might require learning a framework, designing the interface, building features, testing the application, and publishing it.

    The Intent Graph represents these relationships so that a big goal becomes a sequence of understandable actions rather than one overwhelming task.

    1. The Reality Loop

    Plans should adapt to reality.

    What if your AI assistant checked in at a time you chose, asked what you accomplished, understood what blocked you, and helped determine the next practical action?

    Instead of repeatedly generating new plans, the experience could build on previous progress.

    The principle is simple: when reality changes, the plan should change too.

    1. A More Connected Intent Network

    Eventually, goals may require more than personal organization.

    They might involve useful tools, learning resources, collaborators, or services. A connected system could help people discover what they need to move from an idea to an outcome.

    The challenge is making these connections genuinely useful without overwhelming users with notifications or unnecessary complexity.

    Why build another productivity app?

    That's a fair question.

    There are already excellent task managers, calendars, habit trackers, and AI assistants.

    I don't think the answer is to put a chatbot inside another to-do list.

    The more interesting question is:

    Can we design software around the progress a person wants to make, rather than the tasks they happen to enter?

    That means thinking about context, dependencies, setbacks, follow-ups, and what the user should do next.

    It also means respecting user control. An assistant should help people make decisions, not turn their lives into an endless stream of automated reminders.

    The difficult engineering questions

    This concept raises several questions I'm interested in exploring:

    • How can an AI maintain useful context across multiple days?
    • How can it distinguish meaningful progress from simply completing tasks?
    • When should it suggest a change instead of generating another plan?
    • How can we make the experience useful without requiring users to sign up before they can try it?
    • How can we build an engaging system without making it addictive or notification-heavy?

    These are product-design problems as much as AI problems.

    A genuinely useful LifeOS should help people become more capable and independent over time, not more dependent on the assistant.

    Building in public

    Cometflow LifeOS is an independent product under the Cometflow Space ecosystem, and I'm interested in exploring how this idea can become a practical daily-use experience.

    The goal is ambitious, but the principle is straightforward: help people turn intentions into actions, learn from what actually happens, and keep moving forward.

    I would rather build a focused system that helps someone achieve one meaningful goal than a giant dashboard full of features they never use.

    I have a question for developers and builders

    Imagine you could give an AI assistant one responsibility beyond answering questions.

    Would you want it to:

    1. Help you stay consistent with long-term goals?
    2. Adapt your plans when things go wrong?
    3. Organize your projects, resources, and next actions?
    4. Help you turn ideas into finished products?

    Or do you think this entire concept needs a different approach?

    I'd genuinely like to hear your perspective. What would make an AI-powered LifeOS useful enough to become part of your everyday routine?

    AI #Productivity #WebDev #BuildInPublic

    #ai #programming #apk #productivity #software #coding #development #engineering #inclusive #community
    What If AI Didn't Just Answer Your Questions, but Helped You Actually Get Things Done?

  23. We have a virtual book club to discuss the short stories in After Dinner Conversation. Makes sense, each story comes with five discussion questions anyway! You can sign up here! buff.ly/TDGGoB7

    #bookclub #virtualbookclub #shortstory #meetup

  24. “We are in a constitutional crisis.

    With only days before the midterm elections, Trump is using the power of the federal government to threaten states, intimidate election officials and disenfranchise voters.

    This is most obvious in California, where his Department of Justice demanded that state election officials set aside ballots from 20,000 voters the Trump administration claims to believe are noncitizens.

    When the election officials refused, the DOJ sued. Then it threatened criminal prosecution. Trump said the election officials in California “will all go to jail for a long period of time.”

    This week, Attorney General Todd Blanche refused to commit to respecting state election results.”
    newsletters.democracydocket.co

  25. We need some rat fumigating at the top. Do you remember when Republicans were all about states rights? This was before they got their agent of chaos installed at the top. Now the tune has changed to domination of the states. Specifically breaking the law to interfere with and turn elections to their favor when they know in our democratic system, they are no longer are electable.
    apple.news/AeelPV-zbRlaT4rM-HY

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.