#plannedobsolescence — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #plannedobsolescence, aggregated by home.social.
-
Nearly impossible? How #Fairphone built the ethical, repairable Fairphone Gen 6+
Fairphone’s CTO explains how and why the Dutch company builds a different kind of smartphone.
Ryan Whitwam – Sep 4, 2026Excerpt: " #Smartphone longevity didn’t used to matter. In the past, before you could wear out or break a phone, there was always some shiny new thing to buy. Today, we expect our smartphones to go the distance, but they’ve also become less repairable and, in many cases, more fragile. Fairphone, a Dutch smartphone maker that has just entered the US market, thinks about phones differently.
"The new $650 Fairphone Gen 6+ is designed both for longevity and easy #repairability. There are trade-offs to this approach if you’re used to the standard glass and aluminum sandwiches filled with glue, gaskets, and teeny-tiny screws. But the drawbacks could be worth it for the right buyer. Fairphone CTO Chandler Hatton told Ars that Fairphone’s goal is to provide a compelling mobile experience while also enabling the user to 'fully own' their device. At the end of the day, this is what a lot of people say they want in a smartphone.
Take it apart, put it back together
"These days, Google, Samsung, and Apple support phones with software updates for the better part of a decade, but will the hardware last that long? And what happens when it needs a repair? You may be out of luck or out a lot of money, but Fairphone prioritizes the self-repair experience.
" 'We’re doing something that was long thought to be nearly impossible,' said Hatton. 'Which is delivering high-performing modular smartphones that can last for a very long time.' "
#SolarPunkSunday #RightToRepair #FixIt #PlannedObsolescence #BuiltToLast #Fairphones #Smartphones
-
Nearly impossible? How #Fairphone built the ethical, repairable Fairphone Gen 6+
Fairphone’s CTO explains how and why the Dutch company builds a different kind of smartphone.
Ryan Whitwam – Sep 4, 2026Excerpt: " #Smartphone longevity didn’t used to matter. In the past, before you could wear out or break a phone, there was always some shiny new thing to buy. Today, we expect our smartphones to go the distance, but they’ve also become less repairable and, in many cases, more fragile. Fairphone, a Dutch smartphone maker that has just entered the US market, thinks about phones differently.
"The new $650 Fairphone Gen 6+ is designed both for longevity and easy #repairability. There are trade-offs to this approach if you’re used to the standard glass and aluminum sandwiches filled with glue, gaskets, and teeny-tiny screws. But the drawbacks could be worth it for the right buyer. Fairphone CTO Chandler Hatton told Ars that Fairphone’s goal is to provide a compelling mobile experience while also enabling the user to 'fully own' their device. At the end of the day, this is what a lot of people say they want in a smartphone.
Take it apart, put it back together
"These days, Google, Samsung, and Apple support phones with software updates for the better part of a decade, but will the hardware last that long? And what happens when it needs a repair? You may be out of luck or out a lot of money, but Fairphone prioritizes the self-repair experience.
" 'We’re doing something that was long thought to be nearly impossible,' said Hatton. 'Which is delivering high-performing modular smartphones that can last for a very long time.' "
#SolarPunkSunday #RightToRepair #FixIt #PlannedObsolescence #BuiltToLast #Fairphones #Smartphones
-
Nearly impossible? How #Fairphone built the ethical, repairable Fairphone Gen 6+
Fairphone’s CTO explains how and why the Dutch company builds a different kind of smartphone.
Ryan Whitwam – Sep 4, 2026Excerpt: " #Smartphone longevity didn’t used to matter. In the past, before you could wear out or break a phone, there was always some shiny new thing to buy. Today, we expect our smartphones to go the distance, but they’ve also become less repairable and, in many cases, more fragile. Fairphone, a Dutch smartphone maker that has just entered the US market, thinks about phones differently.
"The new $650 Fairphone Gen 6+ is designed both for longevity and easy #repairability. There are trade-offs to this approach if you’re used to the standard glass and aluminum sandwiches filled with glue, gaskets, and teeny-tiny screws. But the drawbacks could be worth it for the right buyer. Fairphone CTO Chandler Hatton told Ars that Fairphone’s goal is to provide a compelling mobile experience while also enabling the user to 'fully own' their device. At the end of the day, this is what a lot of people say they want in a smartphone.
Take it apart, put it back together
"These days, Google, Samsung, and Apple support phones with software updates for the better part of a decade, but will the hardware last that long? And what happens when it needs a repair? You may be out of luck or out a lot of money, but Fairphone prioritizes the self-repair experience.
" 'We’re doing something that was long thought to be nearly impossible,' said Hatton. 'Which is delivering high-performing modular smartphones that can last for a very long time.' "
#SolarPunkSunday #RightToRepair #FixIt #PlannedObsolescence #BuiltToLast #Fairphones #Smartphones
-
Nearly impossible? How #Fairphone built the ethical, repairable Fairphone Gen 6+
Fairphone’s CTO explains how and why the Dutch company builds a different kind of smartphone.
Ryan Whitwam – Sep 4, 2026Excerpt: " #Smartphone longevity didn’t used to matter. In the past, before you could wear out or break a phone, there was always some shiny new thing to buy. Today, we expect our smartphones to go the distance, but they’ve also become less repairable and, in many cases, more fragile. Fairphone, a Dutch smartphone maker that has just entered the US market, thinks about phones differently.
"The new $650 Fairphone Gen 6+ is designed both for longevity and easy #repairability. There are trade-offs to this approach if you’re used to the standard glass and aluminum sandwiches filled with glue, gaskets, and teeny-tiny screws. But the drawbacks could be worth it for the right buyer. Fairphone CTO Chandler Hatton told Ars that Fairphone’s goal is to provide a compelling mobile experience while also enabling the user to 'fully own' their device. At the end of the day, this is what a lot of people say they want in a smartphone.
Take it apart, put it back together
"These days, Google, Samsung, and Apple support phones with software updates for the better part of a decade, but will the hardware last that long? And what happens when it needs a repair? You may be out of luck or out a lot of money, but Fairphone prioritizes the self-repair experience.
" 'We’re doing something that was long thought to be nearly impossible,' said Hatton. 'Which is delivering high-performing modular smartphones that can last for a very long time.' "
#SolarPunkSunday #RightToRepair #FixIt #PlannedObsolescence #BuiltToLast #Fairphones #Smartphones
-
Nearly impossible? How #Fairphone built the ethical, repairable Fairphone Gen 6+
Fairphone’s CTO explains how and why the Dutch company builds a different kind of smartphone.
Ryan Whitwam – Sep 4, 2026Excerpt: " #Smartphone longevity didn’t used to matter. In the past, before you could wear out or break a phone, there was always some shiny new thing to buy. Today, we expect our smartphones to go the distance, but they’ve also become less repairable and, in many cases, more fragile. Fairphone, a Dutch smartphone maker that has just entered the US market, thinks about phones differently.
"The new $650 Fairphone Gen 6+ is designed both for longevity and easy #repairability. There are trade-offs to this approach if you’re used to the standard glass and aluminum sandwiches filled with glue, gaskets, and teeny-tiny screws. But the drawbacks could be worth it for the right buyer. Fairphone CTO Chandler Hatton told Ars that Fairphone’s goal is to provide a compelling mobile experience while also enabling the user to 'fully own' their device. At the end of the day, this is what a lot of people say they want in a smartphone.
Take it apart, put it back together
"These days, Google, Samsung, and Apple support phones with software updates for the better part of a decade, but will the hardware last that long? And what happens when it needs a repair? You may be out of luck or out a lot of money, but Fairphone prioritizes the self-repair experience.
" 'We’re doing something that was long thought to be nearly impossible,' said Hatton. 'Which is delivering high-performing modular smartphones that can last for a very long time.' "
#SolarPunkSunday #RightToRepair #FixIt #PlannedObsolescence #BuiltToLast #Fairphones #Smartphones
-
The Security Illusion: How Corporate Overlords Strip Your Ownership
1,571 words, 8 minutes read time.
The modern hardware market is a calculated trap for the man who values his independence. You walk into a store, lay down your cash, and leave believing you own the machine, but you are mistaken. The transaction is no longer a clean break between buyer and seller; it is an induction into a digital prison camp. Manufacturers have weaponized the fear of being hacked to maintain a total stranglehold on every piece of hardware they move. They wrap their control in the flag of cybersecurity, but the reality is a cold, calculated campaign to dismantle your autonomy and ensure you remain a permanent tenant in their proprietary ecosystem.
They use the promise of safety to sell you the chains. The moment that device touches your network, you are no longer the operator; you are a captive audience for their remote directives. These companies know that as long as they can convince you that the world is a dangerous, breach-prone place, you will accept any restriction they force upon you. They are not protecting your interests, and they are certainly not worried about your network integrity. Their singular goal is to strip away your ability to repair, modify, or master your own property so they can continue to dictate the terms of your existence.
The Calculated Strategy of Forced Compliance
Manufacturers push mandatory firmware updates under the guise of protecting your home or office network from the specter of modern exploits. They deploy these patches with a heavy, uncompromising hand, forcing code onto your machine that you never requested and that you lack the authority to uninstall. These updates are a classic Trojan horse. They bundle necessary security patches with restrictive, hidden locks that deliberately break your ability to use third-party parts or run the open software of your choosing. It is a tactical strike against the user who dares to think their hardware belongs to them.
When you attempt to refuse, they flood your interface with dire, alarmist warnings about vulnerabilities and potential exploits. They force a binary choice upon you: either you surrender absolute control of your hardware to their remote backend, or you remain exposed to a digital threat they claim only they can stop. It is a textbook psychological maneuver from a corporate playbook that relies on fear to bypass your critical thinking. They bet on your instinct for safety to keep you compliant, ensuring that you never look under the hood to see exactly what functionality they are gutting in the name of your protection.
Cyber Resilience Versus Corporate Authority
The industry hides behind professional standards set by organizations like NIST and CISA to justify this aggressive behavior. They point to the necessity of platform firmware resiliency to silence anyone who dares to ask why their expensive equipment suddenly lost core features after a routine update. In truth, these technical guidelines are being cynically twisted. Genuine, robust security requires total transparency, yet these updates are delivered as black boxes. You are given no granular logs and absolutely no say in what is being overwritten or disabled within your own equipment.
When a company can reach into your home or shop and disable your hardware’s functionality with a single, unrequested remote command, your claim to ownership is a hollow lie. They maintain a high-privileged, persistent foothold on your hardware long after you have paid the bill, essentially treating your property as a node in their private network. You become an observer in your own house rather than the master of your own tools. The firmware serves as the final, immutable authority, granting the manufacturer the right to decide what your machine is permitted to do today, tomorrow, or a year from now.
The Cold Economics of the Digital Leash
This is not about your safety; it is strictly about their bottom line and total market domination. A device that can be locked down is a device that generates constant, recurring revenue through forced upgrades and the requirement to purchase exclusive, overpriced parts. By wrapping this greed in the language of cybersecurity, they neutralize all rational dissent. Anyone who demands the right to repair or modify their gear is immediately framed as a reckless, dangerous amateur who does not care about the systemic risk of a breach. This narrative is designed to keep you subservient to their profit margins.
The ultimate objective is a future where no machine can operate outside of the manufacturer’s direct control, ensuring that every cycle and every transaction flows back to their balance sheet. You are being managed like a predictable data point rather than treated like an autonomous owner. They have built an environment where your tech is merely a satellite within their wider commercial architecture. If you cannot modify it, you do not own it. You are simply renting a utility that can be revoked, restricted, or rendered obsolete the second it ceases to be profitable for them to let you keep using it.
Conclusion
The current state of hardware ownership is a failure of principle. Corporations have successfully weaponized the fear of cyber threats as a tool to consolidate power and crush individual autonomy. By understanding this dynamic, you can start to see through the marketing fluff that covers up this erosion of rights. To recap the reality of this landscape:
True security requires transparency and individual control, both of which are currently being systematically dismantled by manufacturers.
Security is the primary justification used to strip you of your rights as a hardware owner.
Mandatory firmware updates are often calculated commercial tactics to enforce ecosystem lock-in rather than genuine vulnerability mitigation.
The industry maintains a permanent, unauthorized, and intrusive level of control over the hardware you have already purchased and paid for.
Reclaiming Your Property Rights: A Call to Action
The reality is harsh: if a manufacturer can reach into your device and rewrite its capabilities after you have paid for it, you do not own that hardware. You are merely a long-term renter under the illusion of possession. To reclaim your property, you must stop being a passive consumer and start acting like an owner. You need to organize, push back, and demand the legal right to control the machines you paid for. This fight is not just about convenience; it is about the fundamental principle of property rights in a digital age.
You have the power to push back by supporting the organizations already on the front lines. Groups like the Right to Repair movement, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Free Software Foundation are fighting the legislative and technical battles to strip away the manufacturer’s backdoor access. They are the ones documenting these abuses and lobbying for legislation that forces companies to stop bricking hardware remotely. Align yourself with them, lend your voice to their campaigns, and put pressure on the systems that have been built to ignore your rights.
Finally, take direct action by contacting your state and federal representatives today. Do not settle for form letters or generic responses. Demand that they support legislation establishing that software-locked hardware is a violation of consumer protection and antitrust laws. Tell them you expect a market where ownership is absolute and where firmware updates cannot be used to degrade the utility of your purchased property. If they want your support, they must defend your right to own what you buy. Stop waiting for permission to be the master of your own tools and start demanding the accountability you are owed.
SUPPORTSUBSCRIBECONTACT MED. Bryan King
Sources
- NIST SP 800-193: Platform Firmware Resiliency Guidelines
- CISA: Secure by Design Principles
- Electronic Frontier Foundation: Right to Repair
- Free Software Foundation: Free Hardware Campaign
- The Repair Association: Advocacy and Legislation
- FTC: Nixing the Fix Report
- IEEE: IoT Security and Firmware Standards
- MITRE: Firmware Security in the Supply Chain
- NIST SP 800-147: BIOS Protection Guidelines
- CISA: Protecting Against Firmware Vulnerabilities
- EFF: When Hardware Isn’t Yours
- FSF: The Problem with Tivoization
- FTC: Competition Advocacy in Tech Markets
- IEEE: Securing the Connected Future
- NIST: Cybersecurity Framework for Manufacturing
- CISA: IoT Security Best Practices
- EFF: Coders Rights Project
- FSF: Defective by Design Campaign
- FTC: Statement on Right to Repair
- IEEE: Firmware Update Security Risks
- NIST SP 800-147B: BIOS Protection for Servers
- CISA: Supply Chain Risk Management
- EFF: Issues with the DMCA
- FSF: What is Free Software?
- FTC: Consumer Rights Overview
- IEEE: Security Analysis of Firmware Updates
- NIST: Hardware Root of Trust
- CISA: Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
- EFF: Lawsuits against Repair Restrictions
- FSF: GPL Compliance and Enforcement
- FTC: Antitrust Enforcement
- IEEE: Challenges in IoT Firmware Integrity
- NIST: Definition of Firmware
- CISA: Industrial Control Systems Security
- EFF: Copyright Reform and Device Ownership
- FSF: The Fight for Hardware Freedom
- FTC: Staff Reports on Market Competition
- IEEE: Trusted Execution Environments in Firmware
- NIST: Supply Chain Risk Management
- CISA: Binding Operational Directives
- EFF: Intellectual Property vs. Ownership
- FSF: Copyright Assignment and Control
- FTC: Enforcement Actions against Manufacturers
- IEEE: Secure Firmware Over-the-Air Updates
- NIST SP 800-190: Container Security Guidelines
- CISA: Cybersecurity Framework Overview
- EFF: Repair is a Fundamental Right
- FSF: Know Your Rights regarding Software
- FTC: Consumer Advocacy Programs
- IEEE: Verified Boot and Firmware Security
Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author. The information provided is based on personal research, experience, and understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing. Readers should consult relevant experts or authorities for specific guidance related to their unique situations.
Related Posts
Rate this:
#aftermarketParts #antiTrust #CISAGuidelines #consumerAdvocacy #consumerChoice #consumerProtection #consumerRights #corporateControl #cyberResilience #cybersecurity #cybersecurityStandards #dataPrivacy #deviceFreedom #deviceLongevity #deviceManagement #digitalAutonomy #digitalEnclosure #digitalIndependence #digitalRights #ecosystemLockIn #firmwarePatches #firmwareSecurity #firmwareVulnerabilities #forcedFirmwareUpdates #hardwareBricking #hardwareHacking #hardwareIntegrity #hardwareModification #hardwareOwnership #hardwareSecurity #IoTSecurity #manufacturerBackdoors #manufacturerControl #NISTStandards #openSourceHardware #ownerRights #plannedObsolescence #PropertyRights #proprietarySystems #repairIndependence #RightToRepair #secureByDesign #softwareFreedom #softwareRestrictions #techAccountability #techMonopoly #techRegulation #techTransparency #userAutonomy -
The Security Illusion: How Corporate Overlords Strip Your Ownership
1,571 words, 8 minutes read time.
The modern hardware market is a calculated trap for the man who values his independence. You walk into a store, lay down your cash, and leave believing you own the machine, but you are mistaken. The transaction is no longer a clean break between buyer and seller; it is an induction into a digital prison camp. Manufacturers have weaponized the fear of being hacked to maintain a total stranglehold on every piece of hardware they move. They wrap their control in the flag of cybersecurity, but the reality is a cold, calculated campaign to dismantle your autonomy and ensure you remain a permanent tenant in their proprietary ecosystem.
They use the promise of safety to sell you the chains. The moment that device touches your network, you are no longer the operator; you are a captive audience for their remote directives. These companies know that as long as they can convince you that the world is a dangerous, breach-prone place, you will accept any restriction they force upon you. They are not protecting your interests, and they are certainly not worried about your network integrity. Their singular goal is to strip away your ability to repair, modify, or master your own property so they can continue to dictate the terms of your existence.
The Calculated Strategy of Forced Compliance
Manufacturers push mandatory firmware updates under the guise of protecting your home or office network from the specter of modern exploits. They deploy these patches with a heavy, uncompromising hand, forcing code onto your machine that you never requested and that you lack the authority to uninstall. These updates are a classic Trojan horse. They bundle necessary security patches with restrictive, hidden locks that deliberately break your ability to use third-party parts or run the open software of your choosing. It is a tactical strike against the user who dares to think their hardware belongs to them.
When you attempt to refuse, they flood your interface with dire, alarmist warnings about vulnerabilities and potential exploits. They force a binary choice upon you: either you surrender absolute control of your hardware to their remote backend, or you remain exposed to a digital threat they claim only they can stop. It is a textbook psychological maneuver from a corporate playbook that relies on fear to bypass your critical thinking. They bet on your instinct for safety to keep you compliant, ensuring that you never look under the hood to see exactly what functionality they are gutting in the name of your protection.
Cyber Resilience Versus Corporate Authority
The industry hides behind professional standards set by organizations like NIST and CISA to justify this aggressive behavior. They point to the necessity of platform firmware resiliency to silence anyone who dares to ask why their expensive equipment suddenly lost core features after a routine update. In truth, these technical guidelines are being cynically twisted. Genuine, robust security requires total transparency, yet these updates are delivered as black boxes. You are given no granular logs and absolutely no say in what is being overwritten or disabled within your own equipment.
When a company can reach into your home or shop and disable your hardware’s functionality with a single, unrequested remote command, your claim to ownership is a hollow lie. They maintain a high-privileged, persistent foothold on your hardware long after you have paid the bill, essentially treating your property as a node in their private network. You become an observer in your own house rather than the master of your own tools. The firmware serves as the final, immutable authority, granting the manufacturer the right to decide what your machine is permitted to do today, tomorrow, or a year from now.
The Cold Economics of the Digital Leash
This is not about your safety; it is strictly about their bottom line and total market domination. A device that can be locked down is a device that generates constant, recurring revenue through forced upgrades and the requirement to purchase exclusive, overpriced parts. By wrapping this greed in the language of cybersecurity, they neutralize all rational dissent. Anyone who demands the right to repair or modify their gear is immediately framed as a reckless, dangerous amateur who does not care about the systemic risk of a breach. This narrative is designed to keep you subservient to their profit margins.
The ultimate objective is a future where no machine can operate outside of the manufacturer’s direct control, ensuring that every cycle and every transaction flows back to their balance sheet. You are being managed like a predictable data point rather than treated like an autonomous owner. They have built an environment where your tech is merely a satellite within their wider commercial architecture. If you cannot modify it, you do not own it. You are simply renting a utility that can be revoked, restricted, or rendered obsolete the second it ceases to be profitable for them to let you keep using it.
Conclusion
The current state of hardware ownership is a failure of principle. Corporations have successfully weaponized the fear of cyber threats as a tool to consolidate power and crush individual autonomy. By understanding this dynamic, you can start to see through the marketing fluff that covers up this erosion of rights. To recap the reality of this landscape:
True security requires transparency and individual control, both of which are currently being systematically dismantled by manufacturers.
Security is the primary justification used to strip you of your rights as a hardware owner.
Mandatory firmware updates are often calculated commercial tactics to enforce ecosystem lock-in rather than genuine vulnerability mitigation.
The industry maintains a permanent, unauthorized, and intrusive level of control over the hardware you have already purchased and paid for.
Reclaiming Your Property Rights: A Call to Action
The reality is harsh: if a manufacturer can reach into your device and rewrite its capabilities after you have paid for it, you do not own that hardware. You are merely a long-term renter under the illusion of possession. To reclaim your property, you must stop being a passive consumer and start acting like an owner. You need to organize, push back, and demand the legal right to control the machines you paid for. This fight is not just about convenience; it is about the fundamental principle of property rights in a digital age.
You have the power to push back by supporting the organizations already on the front lines. Groups like the Right to Repair movement, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Free Software Foundation are fighting the legislative and technical battles to strip away the manufacturer’s backdoor access. They are the ones documenting these abuses and lobbying for legislation that forces companies to stop bricking hardware remotely. Align yourself with them, lend your voice to their campaigns, and put pressure on the systems that have been built to ignore your rights.
Finally, take direct action by contacting your state and federal representatives today. Do not settle for form letters or generic responses. Demand that they support legislation establishing that software-locked hardware is a violation of consumer protection and antitrust laws. Tell them you expect a market where ownership is absolute and where firmware updates cannot be used to degrade the utility of your purchased property. If they want your support, they must defend your right to own what you buy. Stop waiting for permission to be the master of your own tools and start demanding the accountability you are owed.
SUPPORTSUBSCRIBECONTACT MED. Bryan King
Sources
- NIST SP 800-193: Platform Firmware Resiliency Guidelines
- CISA: Secure by Design Principles
- Electronic Frontier Foundation: Right to Repair
- Free Software Foundation: Free Hardware Campaign
- The Repair Association: Advocacy and Legislation
- FTC: Nixing the Fix Report
- IEEE: IoT Security and Firmware Standards
- MITRE: Firmware Security in the Supply Chain
- NIST SP 800-147: BIOS Protection Guidelines
- CISA: Protecting Against Firmware Vulnerabilities
- EFF: When Hardware Isn’t Yours
- FSF: The Problem with Tivoization
- FTC: Competition Advocacy in Tech Markets
- IEEE: Securing the Connected Future
- NIST: Cybersecurity Framework for Manufacturing
- CISA: IoT Security Best Practices
- EFF: Coders Rights Project
- FSF: Defective by Design Campaign
- FTC: Statement on Right to Repair
- IEEE: Firmware Update Security Risks
- NIST SP 800-147B: BIOS Protection for Servers
- CISA: Supply Chain Risk Management
- EFF: Issues with the DMCA
- FSF: What is Free Software?
- FTC: Consumer Rights Overview
- IEEE: Security Analysis of Firmware Updates
- NIST: Hardware Root of Trust
- CISA: Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
- EFF: Lawsuits against Repair Restrictions
- FSF: GPL Compliance and Enforcement
- FTC: Antitrust Enforcement
- IEEE: Challenges in IoT Firmware Integrity
- NIST: Definition of Firmware
- CISA: Industrial Control Systems Security
- EFF: Copyright Reform and Device Ownership
- FSF: The Fight for Hardware Freedom
- FTC: Staff Reports on Market Competition
- IEEE: Trusted Execution Environments in Firmware
- NIST: Supply Chain Risk Management
- CISA: Binding Operational Directives
- EFF: Intellectual Property vs. Ownership
- FSF: Copyright Assignment and Control
- FTC: Enforcement Actions against Manufacturers
- IEEE: Secure Firmware Over-the-Air Updates
- NIST SP 800-190: Container Security Guidelines
- CISA: Cybersecurity Framework Overview
- EFF: Repair is a Fundamental Right
- FSF: Know Your Rights regarding Software
- FTC: Consumer Advocacy Programs
- IEEE: Verified Boot and Firmware Security
Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author. The information provided is based on personal research, experience, and understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing. Readers should consult relevant experts or authorities for specific guidance related to their unique situations.
Related Posts
Rate this:
#aftermarketParts #antiTrust #CISAGuidelines #consumerAdvocacy #consumerChoice #consumerProtection #consumerRights #corporateControl #cyberResilience #cybersecurity #cybersecurityStandards #dataPrivacy #deviceFreedom #deviceLongevity #deviceManagement #digitalAutonomy #digitalEnclosure #digitalIndependence #digitalRights #ecosystemLockIn #firmwarePatches #firmwareSecurity #firmwareVulnerabilities #forcedFirmwareUpdates #hardwareBricking #hardwareHacking #hardwareIntegrity #hardwareModification #hardwareOwnership #hardwareSecurity #IoTSecurity #manufacturerBackdoors #manufacturerControl #NISTStandards #openSourceHardware #ownerRights #plannedObsolescence #PropertyRights #proprietarySystems #repairIndependence #RightToRepair #secureByDesign #softwareFreedom #softwareRestrictions #techAccountability #techMonopoly #techRegulation #techTransparency #userAutonomy -
Die zerbrechlichen Ketten der Bequemlichkeit
Ein Plädoyer für die digitale Emanzipation Europas
Wir haben unsere digitale Freiheit gegen Komfort eingetauscht. Microsoft, Amazon, Google und Meta bestimmen, wie wir kommunizieren, arbeiten und denken. Der CrowdStrike-Schock war kein Unglück, er war eine Ansage. Es ist Zeit, die Ketten zu sprengen. Ein Plädoyer für die digitale Emanzipation Europas. [Mehr lesen...]
https://www.christin-loehner.de/blog/die-zerbrechlichen-ketten-der-bequemlichkeit
#DigitaleSouveränität #DigitalSovereignty #Linux #OpenSource #FOSS #FreieSoftware #Datenschutz #Privacy #BigTech #FuckBigTech #DeGoogle #DeleteGoogle #DeleteFacebook #BoycottAmazon #BoycottMicrosoft #BoycottApple #Überwachungskapitalismus #SurveillanceCapitalism #Fediverse #Mastodon #Dezentralisierung #Decentralization #PublicMoneyPublicCode #ÖffentlichesGeld #RightToRepair #Fairphone #Framework #SelfHosted #Nextcloud #Signal #Tor #VPN #CrowdStrike #CloudAct #DSGVO #GDPR #Hetzner #EuropeFirst #TechSovereignty #DigitalRights #DigitaleRechte #Netzpolitik #CCC #ChaosComputerClub #ByeByeElon #QuitX #LeaveX #SaveSocial #Ecosia #Startpage #uBlockOrigin #LibreWolf #Firefox #FediTips #EuropäischeWerte #EuropeanValues #TechEthics #Nachhaltigkeit #Sustainability #GeplantéObsoleszenz #PlannedObsolescence #KaufLokal #LocalFirst #Widerstand #DigitalResistance #PolitischeTech #TechForGood #KI #AI #OpenSourceAI #ZenDiS #PublicCode #Libre #GNU #Debian #Fedora #PopOS #ZorinOS #NixOS #AntiColonialism #DigitalerKolonialismus #Cloudflare #AWS #AzureAlternative #EUTech #MadeInEurope
-
#Degrowth can work — here’s how science can help
Wealthy countries can create prosperity while using less materials and energy if they abandon #EconomicGrowth as an objective.
By Jason Hickel, Giorgos Kallis, Tim Jackson, Daniel W. O’Neill, Juliet B. Schor, Julia K. Steinberger, Peter A. Victor & Diana Ürge-Vorsatz, 12 December 2022
Excerpt: "The global economy is structured around growth — the idea that firms, industries and nations must increase production every year, regardless of whether it is needed. This dynamic is driving climate change and ecological breakdown. High-income economies, and the corporations and wealthy classes that dominate them, are mainly responsible for this problem and consume energy and materials at unsustainable rates.
"Yet many industrialized countries are now struggling to grow their economies, given economic convulsions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, resource scarcities and stagnating productivity improvements. Governments face a difficult situation. Their attempts to stimulate growth clash with objectives to improve human well-being and reduce environmental damage.
"GDP is getting a makeover — what it means for economies, health and the planet
"Researchers in ecological economics call for a different approach — degrowth. Wealthy economies should abandon growth of gross domestic product (#GDP) as a goal, scale down destructive and unnecessary forms of #production to reduce energy and material use, and focus economic activity around securing human needs and well-being. This approach, which has gained traction in recent years, can enable rapid #decarbonization and stop ecological breakdown while improving social outcomes. It frees up energy and materials for low- and middle-income countries in which growth might still be needed for development. Degrowth is a purposeful strategy to stabilize economies and achieve social and ecological goals, unlike recession, which is chaotic and socially destabilizing and occurs when growth-dependent economies fail to grow.
"Reports this year by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (#IPCC) and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on #Biodiversity and #Ecosystem Services (#IPBES) suggest that degrowth policies should be considered in the fight against #ClimateBreakdown and #biodiversity loss, respectively. Policies to support such a strategy include the following.
"Reduce less-necessary production. This means scaling down destructive sectors such as #FossilFuels, mass-produced meat and dairy, #FastFashion, #advertising, #cars and aviation, including #PrivateJets. At the same time, there is a need to end the #PlannedObsolescence of products, lengthen their lifespans and reduce the purchasing power of the #rich.
"Improve #PublicServices. It is necessary to ensure universal access to high-quality #HealthCare, #Education, #Housing, transportation, Internet, #RenewableEnergy and nutritious food. #UniversalPublicServices can deliver strong social outcomes without high levels of resource use.
"Introduce a green jobs guarantee. This would train and mobilize labour around urgent social and ecological objectives, such as installing renewables, insulating buildings, regenerating #ecosystems and improving social care. A programme of this type would end unemployment and ensure a just transition out of jobs for workers in declining industries or 'sunset sectors', such as those contingent on fossil fuels. It could be paired with a #UniversalIncome policy.
"Reduce working time. This could be achieved by lowering the retirement age, encouraging part-time working or adopting a four-day working week [and hybrid or remote work]. These measures would lower #CarbonEmissions and free people to engage in care and other welfare-improving activities. They would also stabilize employment as less-necessary production declines.
"Enable #sustainable development. This requires cancelling unfair and unpayable debts of low- and middle-income countries, curbing unequal exchange in international trade and creating conditions for productive capacity to be reoriented towards achieving social objectives.
"Some countries, regions and cities have already introduced elements of these policies. Many European nations guarantee free health care and education; Vienna and Singapore are renowned for high-quality public housing; and nearly 100 cities worldwide offer free public transport. Job guarantee schemes have been used by many nations in the past, and experiments with basic incomes and shorter working hours are under way in Finland, Sweden and New Zealand.
"But implementing a more comprehensive strategy of degrowth — in a safe and just way — faces five key research challenges, as we outline here."
Read more:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04412-xArchived version:
https://archive.ph/AtJ87
#FourDayWorkweek #RemoteWork #HybridWork #CircularEconomy #CapitalismKills #RightToRepair #ProtectMotherEarth #CorporateColonialism #BuyLess #BuyNothing #LibraryOfThings #SolarPunkSunday -
My phone is an iPhone 14 Pro Max. I didn’t upgrade to a 15 last year. I used to always skip a generation, then there were a few years where I did not, now I am trying to get back into the every-other-iteration way of thinking. When the next iPhone is released I will probably upgrade. Not because I necessarily want to (though I absolutely do) but because my trusty ol’ two-year-old is starting to get weird on me.
Are there any other 14 users still out there? Are they experiencing weirdness too? That’s a rhetorical question. I’m not expecting a discussion here, I’m just an old man yelling at clouds, so to speak.
It’s not so much weirdness as slowness. Everything, both native and 3rd party applications, just seem to need a little more time to do what they gotta do. Launch? Crunch some data? Open a photo? Play an audio or video file? It just seems to take a little longer than it used to. In some cases it takes a few full seconds more than it used to.
I wonder… is this some planned obsolescence program kicking in? Is Apple trying to convince me to upgrade this cycle by hamstringing my system over here? It’s possible. I don’t think it’s likely- (I mean it’s a 14 not a 4, right?) but it could be.
Not that I need any arm twisting or anything. I do want a new phone and it will probably just be a few months until the 16’s hit the market. I just wonder.
Anyway, I took today’s photo a day challenge pic before I left the cellar this morning. Yeah, it’s another guitar pic. What are you gonna do about it?
327/365https://robertjames1971.blog/2024/07/23/iphone-14-users/
#365 #365Challenge #Apple #iPhone #iphone14ProMax #iphoneUpgrade #iphoneography #nextGeneration #nextGenerationIphone #obsolescence #photoADay #photoADayChallenge #photography #plannedObsolescence #tech #upgrade
-
ICYMI - From 2017
Levels of #EWaste soar in #Asia as gadgets become affordable, UN says
Amount of electronic waste up 63% in five years, with China’s more than doubling, United Nations University report finds
Agence France-Presse
Sun 15 Jan 2017 11.29 EST"Levels of #ElectronicWaste are rising sharply across #Asia, as higher incomes mean hundreds of millions of people can afford #smartphones and other #gadgets, according to a UN study.
"The amount of e-waste in Asia has risen by 63% in five years, a report by United Nations University said, warning of the need to improve #recycling and disposal methods across the region to prevent serious #environmental and health consequences.
"Ruediger Kuehr, the report’s co-author and head of UNU’s sustainable cycles programme, said: 'For many countries that already lack infrastructure for environmentally sound e-waste management, the increasing volumes are a cause for concern.'
"For many years, China and other Asian countries have recycled discarded electronics from wealthier countries in rudimentary and often unsafe factories.
"But the report said Asia has become a major source of e-waste due to increasingly affluent #consumers buying electronic items including #phones, #tablets, #refrigerators, #computers and #televisions.
"China’s generation of e-waste more than doubled between 2010 and 2015, the period of the study, according to the report.
"#HongKong generated the highest amount of e-waste in Asia in 2015, an average of 21.7kg (3.4st) per person.
"#Singapore and #Taiwan created just over 19kg per person in 2015.
"#Cambodia, #Vietnam and the #Philippines were among the lowest e-waste generators, with an average of about 1kg per person."
#Consumerism #Capitalism #Crapitalism #PlannedObsolescence #SupportLegacyProducts #Landfills #RightToRepair #EnvironmentalRacism #WaterIsLife #SoilIsLife #RepairReuseRecycle #Consumerism #Anticonsumerism #EnvironmentalPollution
-
ICYMI - From 2016
The Burning Truth Behind an #EWasteDump in #Africa
Ending the #toxic smoke rising from an iconic dump in #Ghana will take more than curbing Western waste
by Adam Minter
January 13, 2016"They are some of the most iconic photos in environmental journalism: young African men, often shirtless, standing over small fires fueled by digital detritus imported from richer countries. The toxic smoke swirls around them and over #Agbogbloshie, the roughly 20-acre scrap yard in the heart of #AccraGhana, where these men live and work.
"During the last decade, some of the world’s most respected media organizations have transformed Agbogbloshie into a symbol of what’s believed to be a growing crisis: the export—or dumping—of electronic waste from rich, developed countries into Africa. It’s a concise narrative that resonates strongly in a technology-obsessed world. There’s just one problem: The story is not that simple..."
Read more:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/burning-truth-behind-e-waste-dump-africa-180957597/#ElectronicWaste #SupportLegacyProducts #Consumerism #Capitalism #Crapitalism #CorporateColonialism
#PlannedObsolescence
#Landfills #RightToRepair #EnvironmentalRacism #WaterIsLife #SoilIsLife #RepairReuseRecycle
#Consumerism
#Anticonsumerism #EnvironmentalPollution