#leotolstoy — Public Fediverse posts

Season 3 Episode 2: Our Literary Unpopular Opinions

Welcome to Fake Book Club Podcast, Season three, episode two! We’re sharing our unpopular literary opinions about books, reading, and romance. Will you agree or disagree? Do we end this episode with our friendship intact? Listen and find out…

Listen Below!

Listen on Spotify:

https://open.spotify.com/episode/0x1PNDmSQZApeI1zOe5oII?si=kT6Rwmp5Q6G8urOV6iAHGg

Listen on YouTube:

https://youtu.be/0U_TdlAMyMQ

Also listen at the following places:

Things Discussed In This Episode

Is It Just Me, or Are the Books Getting Fancier? A Guide to the Special Editions Trend

The Benefits of Graphic Novels: Why They Count as Reading

What’s the perfect length for a book?

Heated Rivalry by Rachel Reid

Children of Blood and Bone by Tomi Adeyemi

The Dresden Files by Jim Butcher

Percy Jackson Series by Rick Riordan

Edinburgh Nights series by T. L. Huchu 

The Midnight Taxi by Yosha Gunasekera 

Sense and Sensibility by Jane Austen

Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy

Treasure Island by Robert Louis Stevenson

Soften The Blow by Bread Tarleton

Disclaimer: Links to Bookshop.org are affiliate links and the store will receive a small commission if you purchase through those links.

Assertion

Your spirit must constantly assert itself because your body is constantly exerting itself. As soon as you stop working at your spirit, then your body will have complete power over you.

~ Leo Tolstoy

slip:4a1051.

@pluralistic On the "markets can't solve this" aspect ... there's one possible angle in which they might help.

Business function as accounting engines. They don't create wealth, they create accounting profits. (Interesting backstory, look up Alexander Hamilton Church on the origins of Cost Accounting, and yes, he's related to that A. Hamilton.)

Because Reasons, accounting considers some costs and not others. Natural resource accounting, and economics, its own special class of utterly fucked up, and that's also an interesting little tale of utter fuckwitted thinking. See Hotelling's Rule & earlier L.C. Gray (neither of whom cite any geology), and back to David Ricardo for what theory exists. It utterly fails to match actual pricing history (see BP's annual statistical rule, petroleum's got excellent data to 1860).

(Hotelling's relationship to Rockefeller-funded University of Chicago also raises eyebrows: petroleum monopolist-financed economist justifies petroleum monopolist pricing.)

Leo Tolstoy has an interesting alternative accounting, IIRC in "What Then Shall We Do" which includes sunshine and land and other factors excluded from traditional cost accounting.

The Rule of Capture (via an utterly fucked-up 1904 Texas Supreme Court ruling) creates a legal basis that again utterly ignores geological science. The principle is less used, but the legal precedent stands.

Jeffrey S. Dukes, "Burning Buried Sunshine" (2003), gives the information on primordeal primary production (plant growth) that resulted in fossil fuel deposits. A year of present consumption is 5 million years of ancient accumulation, a depletion cost not considered in present pricing.

If it were, depletion allowances for extraction would increase the cost of fossil fuels by a factor of millions. Simply by an accounting change, the resources would be effectively pinned to the ground by a force stronger than gravity: it would be a complete economic loss.

(Odds of this happening? Uncertain. Worth a shot? Um, hell yeah!)

Keep in mind that this is independent and in addition to accounting for sink costs, which is what a carbon or other pollution cost would be. Proposed carbon taxes are a very small fraction of what a full, geologically cognizant cost-accounting depletion allowance would be.

Links to follow.

#AlexanderHamiltonChurch #CostAccounting #HotellingsRule #NaturalResourceEconomics #HowardHotelling #LeoTolstoy #JeffreySDukes #BurningBuriedSunshine #DepletionAllowances #AccountingStandards #Petroleum #Economics