home.social

#injunctions — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #injunctions, aggregated by home.social.

  1. TorrentFreak: U.S. Court Order Against Anna’s Archive Spells More Trouble for the Site. “Anna’s Archive is having a rough month. Following mysterious .org and .se domain suspensions, the shadow library is now facing a permanent injunction from a federal court. After dropping a multi-million damages claim, OCLC won a default judgment and permanent injunction against Anna’s Archive, which it […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/01/19/torrentfreak-u-s-court-order-against-annas-archive-spells-more-trouble-for-the-site/
  2. TorrentFreak: U.S. Court Order Against Anna’s Archive Spells More Trouble for the Site. “Anna’s Archive is having a rough month. Following mysterious .org and .se domain suspensions, the shadow library is now facing a permanent injunction from a federal court. After dropping a multi-million damages claim, OCLC won a default judgment and permanent injunction against Anna’s Archive, which it […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/01/19/torrentfreak-u-s-court-order-against-annas-archive-spells-more-trouble-for-the-site/
  3. TorrentFreak: U.S. Court Order Against Anna’s Archive Spells More Trouble for the Site. “Anna’s Archive is having a rough month. Following mysterious .org and .se domain suspensions, the shadow library is now facing a permanent injunction from a federal court. After dropping a multi-million damages claim, OCLC won a default judgment and permanent injunction against Anna’s Archive, which it […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/01/19/torrentfreak-u-s-court-order-against-annas-archive-spells-more-trouble-for-the-site/
  4. TorrentFreak: U.S. Court Order Against Anna’s Archive Spells More Trouble for the Site. “Anna’s Archive is having a rough month. Following mysterious .org and .se domain suspensions, the shadow library is now facing a permanent injunction from a federal court. After dropping a multi-million damages claim, OCLC won a default judgment and permanent injunction against Anna’s Archive, which it […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/01/19/torrentfreak-u-s-court-order-against-annas-archive-spells-more-trouble-for-the-site/
  5. TorrentFreak: U.S. Court Order Against Anna’s Archive Spells More Trouble for the Site. “Anna’s Archive is having a rough month. Following mysterious .org and .se domain suspensions, the shadow library is now facing a permanent injunction from a federal court. After dropping a multi-million damages claim, OCLC won a default judgment and permanent injunction against Anna’s Archive, which it […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/01/19/torrentfreak-u-s-court-order-against-annas-archive-spells-more-trouble-for-the-site/
  6. 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐒𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲: 𝐀 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐣𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧

    Writing about cybersecurity required time, study, and rigour for work I felt was necessary. One article naturally led to the next; one case connected to the previous one. It was demanding but manageable, and above all, consistent with the journalistic principles I had chosen to uphold.

    suspectfile.com/when-silence-b

    @campuscodi @zackwhittaker
    @jgreigj @lawrenceabrams @briankrebs @PogoWasRight

    #HCRG #Injunctions #Law #Private_Life #UK_High_Court_Injunction

  7. 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐒𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲: 𝐀 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐣𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧

    Writing about cybersecurity required time, study, and rigour for work I felt was necessary. One article naturally led to the next; one case connected to the previous one. It was demanding but manageable, and above all, consistent with the journalistic principles I had chosen to uphold.

    suspectfile.com/when-silence-b

    @campuscodi @zackwhittaker
    @jgreigj @lawrenceabrams @briankrebs @PogoWasRight

    #HCRG #Injunctions #Law #Private_Life #UK_High_Court_Injunction

  8. 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐒𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲: 𝐀 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐣𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧

    Writing about cybersecurity required time, study, and rigour for work I felt was necessary. One article naturally led to the next; one case connected to the previous one. It was demanding but manageable, and above all, consistent with the journalistic principles I had chosen to uphold.

    suspectfile.com/when-silence-b

    @campuscodi @zackwhittaker
    @jgreigj @lawrenceabrams @briankrebs @PogoWasRight

    #HCRG #Injunctions #Law #Private_Life #UK_High_Court_Injunction

  9. 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐒𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲: 𝐀 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐣𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧

    Writing about cybersecurity required time, study, and rigour for work I felt was necessary. One article naturally led to the next; one case connected to the previous one. It was demanding but manageable, and above all, consistent with the journalistic principles I had chosen to uphold.

    suspectfile.com/when-silence-b

    @campuscodi @zackwhittaker
    @jgreigj @lawrenceabrams @briankrebs @PogoWasRight

    #HCRG #Injunctions #Law #Private_Life #UK_High_Court_Injunction

  10. 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐒𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲: 𝐀 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐣𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧

    Writing about cybersecurity required time, study, and rigour for work I felt was necessary. One article naturally led to the next; one case connected to the previous one. It was demanding but manageable, and above all, consistent with the journalistic principles I had chosen to uphold.

    suspectfile.com/when-silence-b

    @campuscodi @zackwhittaker
    @jgreigj @lawrenceabrams @briankrebs @PogoWasRight

    #HCRG #Injunctions #Law #Private_Life #UK_High_Court_Injunction

  11. New Zealand's high court seems to be handing out injunctions to victim entities. Have they really considered the impact on press/journalism and whether such injunctions are effective at all?

    In the past month, we have learned that Manage My Health, Canopy Health, and Neighbourly were all granted injunctions to prevent downloading or sharing of data.

    But do these injunctions really protect consumers and patients? Well, no, not really if the criminals leak data anyway.

    Is the court just enabling entities to claim they have done everything they can to protect patients or consumers (well, other than actually preventing the breaches)?

    Maybe entities should only be granted injunctions if they can first demonstrate that they had reasonable security protections in place and MFA, etc.?

    #healthsec #cybersecurity #injunctions #incidentresponse #databreach

  12. Your Questions Answered: The Supreme Court's Impact On Our #Rights

    The Supreme Court's most recent term reshaped the legal landscape on #immigration , #transgender rights, & #FreeSpeech. But behind the decisions, procedural shifts like limits on nationwide #injunctions and expanded use of the emergency docket signal a court increasingly driven by #politics.

    At the #ACLU we believe that information is power, and that informed opinions make a more perfect union.
    #scotus

    aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/

  13. Review of #SupremeCourt 2024-25 Term
    Legal commentators working in the #media and #academia reviewed the Supreme Court's 2024-25 term. They discussed outcomes from some key cases, including the Supreme Court upholding Tennessee's law banning #transgender medical treatments for minors, allowing states to cut #Medicaid funding from Planned Parenthood, and limiting district courts' use of nationwide #injunctions.

    #cspan #video #transcript

    c-span.org/program/public-affa

  14. The MAGA era
    — and the three latest Trump appointees to the Court
    — has resulted in a new, gruesome project:
    ❌giving Trump whatever he wants.

    🔥This toxic combination of bigotry and fealty has created a Court that uses all its might to attack the less powerful
    while coddling those who already have it all — particularly Donald Trump.

    It’s a Court with a very clear vision of who matters and who needs protection.

    The majority opinion in "Trump v. CASA", the birthright citizenship case,
    was honestly inevitable,
    a culmination of all the ways in which the conservative justices have warped the Court in order to serve Trump.

    Indeed, the Court’s previous term will go down in infamy as the one in which they gave Trump permission to do whatever he wants
    by inventing sweeping #presidential #immunity.

    One year later, Trump needed his reliable pals on the Supreme Court to step in on the #birthright #citizenship case
    because four federal district courts and three federal appeals courts had enjoined him from implementing his executive order eliminating birthright citizenship.

    That shouldn’t be a surprise, or even remotely controversial.

    There’s simply no world where an executive order can undo the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of birthright citizenship
    -- and since the order was so obviously unconstitutional, the lower courts issued universal, or #nationwide, #injunctions to block the policy.

    Those nationwide injunctions stopped Trump from stripping citizenship from babies,
    even in states that were eager to let him do so.

    Twenty conservative states filed an amicus brief urging the Court to let Trump’s executive order go into effect.

    But the conservatives on the Court couldn't face grappling with whether Trump’s executive order was unconstitutional.

    Indeed, they very much want you to know that the administration’s requests did not ask the Court to rule on the birthright citizenship issue at all. Heavens, no.

    This is just about whether lower courts can issue universal, or nationwide, injunctions.

    This is, to put it charitably,
    ⭐️a self-serving lie,
    a way for the conservatives to soothe themselves,
    to pretend they aren’t responsible for Trump turning the immense machinery of his immigration crackdown on literal babies.

    No, all they did was strip the lower courts of the ability to issue universal injunctions.

    Of course, once those injunctions are narrowed,
    the administration is free to proceed on its plans to deprive babies of citizenship anywhere the narrower injunctions don’t apply
    publicnotice.co/p/trump-casa-s

  15. Interesting informed commentary on Trump v CASA. (Source withheld, and further paraphrased here, because it was posted privately but its key point bears repeating.)

    Much has been reported on this decision as supposedly greenlighting the effective end of
    #birthright #citizenship by blocking the #nationwide #injunctions and forcing each separate person harmed to individually sue. But critically, that's not actually what the decision said.

    Paraphrased and distilled, what the majority opinion said is that the birthright citizenship question is not ripe for SCOTUS review yet, but the nationwide injunctions are problematic
    because the lower courts failed to properly document exhaustive examination of possible lesser remedies and how they all fail to deliver complete relief. The Supreme Court therefore remanded the case back to the lower courts and gave them 30 days to complete that full documentation of examination, in order to rigorously show that a nationwide injunction is actually necessary. "This is the big gun; if you're going to use it, you need to meticulously dot every i and cross every t in your explanation of why you pulled it out, and you didn't."

    Of particular note, Amy Coney Barrett essentially said, "Look, we agree that this is
    absolutely necessary, but you need to document that properly and show your work. Come back when you've done that, and the Court will be on your side."

    The majority, however slim, on the Supreme Court are not opposed to the invocation of nationwide injunctions to protect birthright citizenship. What the Court objected to was
    failing to properly show the necessity of those nationwide injunctions. It's an important distinction.

  16. Today is the final day of #SCOTUS’ term — & the justices have left some of the most important & contentious cases until the end.

    They are slated to release 6 opinions, including decisions that will deal with nationwide #injunctions on #Trump’s ban on #BirthrightCitizenship, whether #parents can opt their children out of #school lessons involving #LGBTQ #books, & a #Texas #law that requires age verification to view online #porn.

    🧵

  17. #Drumpf #DOJ suing all 15 judges on the #Maryland #federal court bench over imposition of mandatory 2 day delay policy in any #Habeas cases, a recent policy change that allows attorneys on either side time to properly prepare for #deportation hearings.

    The #PamBondi run #Justice department is opposed to regional circuit court's order requiring clerks to place temporary administrative #injunctions in any case brought by an alleged "illegal immigrant" challenging a detention.

    Bondi's legal attack squad particularly angered by courts move to impose a delay, "Congress has stripped federal courts of #jurisdiction to hear “any cause or claim by or on behalf of any alien arising from the decision or action by the #AttorneyGeneral to commence proceedings, adjudicate cases, or execute removal orders against any alien,” the DOJ said citing the #Immigration and Nationality Act.

    foxnews.com/politics/trump-dhs

    storage.courtlistener.com/reca

    wmar2news.com/infocus/trumps-d

  18. The SCOTUS case is not about Birthright Citizenship. It’s about defanging lower courts by killing off injunctions. “Trump’s attack on birthright citizenship is obviously unconstitutional, and there are no good-faith arguments for his position.”
    #Coup #SCOTUS #Injunctions
    vox.com/scotus/412035/supreme-

  19. CA #AttorneyGeneral updates taxpayers on recent legal challenges he has staff filing against #DJT #WreckingBall operations that are destroying lives of students at schools cut off from previously awarded grant money, as well as tens of thousands impacted as US govt workers are illegally terminated through no fault of their own. Their abrupt, pretextual firings have already caused a 149% increase in state #unemployment benefit claims by federal workers in #California alone.

    CA's #DOJ secured two important preliminary #injunctions this week against the #WhiteHouse. One prevents the #Drumpf Admin from freezing near $3 trillion in vital federal #funding intended for public #safety, #healthcare, childcare, and #infrastructure projects before the case is heard.

    See a list of recent actions of California Dept of Justice has taken to defend citizens from abuses of power, unwarranted persecution and firings by federal authorities, some are highlighted as news released at their official state website.

    oag.ca.gov/media/news

  20. Courts grant injunctions against Biden’s student loan repayment plan

    The future of President #Biden’s new #StudentLoan repayment plan is in doubt after a pair of federal judges issued separate #injunctions Mon preventing the govt from fully implementing & forgiving any more loans through the program while they consider lawsuits to end the #policy.

    #law #StudentLoanForgiveness #StudentDebt #SAVE #debt #poverty
    washingtonpost.com/education/2