home.social

Search

1000 results for “ricci”

  1. Gli astronomi studiano la composizione della superficie di una super-Terra vicina

    #webb @astronomia @[email protected] @[email protected]

    Webb ha analizzato l’esopianeta roccioso LHS 3844 b, rivelando una superficie scura e calda priva di atmosfera. L’analisi indica che la superficie del pianeta è probabilmente composta da basalto o da rocce del mantello, escludendo una composizione simile alla crosta terrestre ricca di silicati.

    umbertogaetani.substack.com/p/

  2. Haven't been posting through it, but this #URFC vs. #BayFC #NWSL game has had an *intense* last 10 minutes!

  3. DATE: May 11, 2026 at 12:00PM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: The testosterone myth? Large analysis finds no link between the “macho” hormone and risk-taking

    URL: psypost.org/the-testosterone-m

    A meta-analysis of 52 studies found no link between testosterone levels and risk-taking. In general, only studies where participants completed specific lottery-based economic tasks showed a modest association between testosterone levels and risk-taking, while other types of behavioral studies did not. Furthermore, the lack of association did not depend on participants’ sex. The paper was published in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews.

    Testosterone is a hormone that belongs to a group of hormones called androgens. It is present in both males and females, but it is usually found in much higher levels in males. In males, testosterone is produced mainly in the testes; in females, smaller amounts are produced in the ovaries and adrenal glands.

    Testosterone plays an important role in the development of male reproductive organs before birth and during puberty. During puberty, it contributes to changes such as a deeper voice, facial and body hair growth, increased muscle mass, and the growth of the penis and testes. In adults, testosterone helps regulate sexual desire, sperm production, bone density, red blood cell production, and muscle strength. Testosterone levels naturally vary by age, time of day, health status, sleep, stress, body fat, and the use of certain medications.

    Study author Irene Sánchez Rodríguez and her colleagues note that, on average, men tend to be more prone to taking risks than women. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain this gender gap. One prominent biological theory states that the gap is produced by differences in testosterone levels. Another theory, the “dual-hormone hypothesis,” suggests that the behavioral effects of testosterone actually depend on concurrent levels of cortisol, the body’s main stress hormone.

    However, studies have not clearly supported the link between testosterone and risk-taking. While some studies have reported that individuals with higher testosterone levels were somewhat more prone to taking financial or physical risks, other studies have found absolutely no association.

    The authors of this study conducted a meta-analysis aimed at synthesizing the existing findings to clarify the association between testosterone levels and risk-taking. They searched scientific databases—Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus—using “risk seeking,” “risk attitude,” and “risk aversion” as search terms. They looked for studies conducted on humans and sought to include studies examining testosterone alone as well as those testing the dual-hormone hypothesis.

    To be included, studies needed to report a statistical association between testosterone and risk preference, to either measure or administer testosterone, and to use at least one behavioral or self-report measure of risk preference. Studies also needed to be written in English, Spanish, or Italian, and provide sufficient data to allow the researchers to calculate an “effect size” (the strength of the link between testosterone levels and risk-taking). In the end, 52 studies comprising 17,340 participants were included in the analyses.

    These studies measured risk in various ways, such as gambling games, balloon-popping tasks, or self-reported questionnaires. They also measured testosterone in different ways: some studies used direct blood or saliva tests, some administered experimental doses of the hormone, and some relied on “morphological proxies” (like the ratio of a person’s index and ring fingers, which is theoretically linked to testosterone exposure in the womb).

    When the researchers aggregated the data, the results showed that the overall association between testosterone levels and risk-taking across all 52 studies was practically zero. In other words, having high or low testosterone did not reliably predict whether a person would take a risk.

    While the overall effect was zero, the data reported by individual studies were very heterogeneous—some studies reported a positive association (higher testosterone – higher risk-taking), while others reported a negative association (higher testosterone – lower risk-taking).

    Further analyses revealed why the results varied so wildly. The researchers found that the method of measurement heavily influenced the outcome. For example, only studies that used lottery-based economic tasks to measure risk-taking showed a modest positive association, while studies measuring risk-taking via other methods (like impulsive games or self-reporting) did not. Similarly, the researchers noted that studies relying on indirect finger measurements sometimes hinted at a link, while highly rigorous studies using direct hormone measurements or administration did not.

    Importantly, the lack of an association between testosterone levels and risk-taking did not depend on sex, meaning the relationship (or lack thereof) was no different in males than in females.

    “Overall, the evidence challenges the notion that testosterone provides a general hormonal basis for human risk preferences,” the study authors concluded. “Instead, findings support a biopsychosocial framework in which ‘risk taking’ reflects the interaction of task demands, cognitive–affective processes, and situational context, with endocrine effects appearing narrow, context-dependent, and method-specific.”

    The study contributes to the scientific knowledge surrounding the behavioral effects of testosterone, suggesting that societal and psychological factors likely play a much larger role in risk-taking than single hormones. However, the study authors note that their search did not yield a sufficient number of appropriate studies to reliably examine the dual-hormone hypothesis (whether a specific interaction between cortisol and testosterone might predict risk-taking).

    The paper, “No relationship between testosterone and risk aversion: A meta-analytic review,” was authored by Irene Sánchez Rodríguez, Luca Bailo, Folco Panizza, Emiliano Ricciardi, and Francesco Bossi.

    URL: psypost.org/the-testosterone-m

    -------------------------------------------------

    DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot

    Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: nationalpsychologist.com

    EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: subscribe-article-digests.clin

    READ ONLINE: read-the-rss-mega-archive.clin

    It's primitive... but it works... mostly...

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #no relationship between testosterone and risk taking #testosterone myth debunked #risk taking meta-analysis #biopsychosocial factors #endocrine effects context dependent #lottery tasks risk study #gender differences risk taking not hormone driven #dual hormone hypothesis inconclusive #testosterone measurement methods matter #neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews study

  4. DATE: May 11, 2026 at 12:00PM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: The testosterone myth? Large analysis finds no link between the “macho” hormone and risk-taking

    URL: psypost.org/the-testosterone-m

    A meta-analysis of 52 studies found no link between testosterone levels and risk-taking. In general, only studies where participants completed specific lottery-based economic tasks showed a modest association between testosterone levels and risk-taking, while other types of behavioral studies did not. Furthermore, the lack of association did not depend on participants’ sex. The paper was published in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews.

    Testosterone is a hormone that belongs to a group of hormones called androgens. It is present in both males and females, but it is usually found in much higher levels in males. In males, testosterone is produced mainly in the testes; in females, smaller amounts are produced in the ovaries and adrenal glands.

    Testosterone plays an important role in the development of male reproductive organs before birth and during puberty. During puberty, it contributes to changes such as a deeper voice, facial and body hair growth, increased muscle mass, and the growth of the penis and testes. In adults, testosterone helps regulate sexual desire, sperm production, bone density, red blood cell production, and muscle strength. Testosterone levels naturally vary by age, time of day, health status, sleep, stress, body fat, and the use of certain medications.

    Study author Irene Sánchez Rodríguez and her colleagues note that, on average, men tend to be more prone to taking risks than women. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain this gender gap. One prominent biological theory states that the gap is produced by differences in testosterone levels. Another theory, the “dual-hormone hypothesis,” suggests that the behavioral effects of testosterone actually depend on concurrent levels of cortisol, the body’s main stress hormone.

    However, studies have not clearly supported the link between testosterone and risk-taking. While some studies have reported that individuals with higher testosterone levels were somewhat more prone to taking financial or physical risks, other studies have found absolutely no association.

    The authors of this study conducted a meta-analysis aimed at synthesizing the existing findings to clarify the association between testosterone levels and risk-taking. They searched scientific databases—Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus—using “risk seeking,” “risk attitude,” and “risk aversion” as search terms. They looked for studies conducted on humans and sought to include studies examining testosterone alone as well as those testing the dual-hormone hypothesis.

    To be included, studies needed to report a statistical association between testosterone and risk preference, to either measure or administer testosterone, and to use at least one behavioral or self-report measure of risk preference. Studies also needed to be written in English, Spanish, or Italian, and provide sufficient data to allow the researchers to calculate an “effect size” (the strength of the link between testosterone levels and risk-taking). In the end, 52 studies comprising 17,340 participants were included in the analyses.

    These studies measured risk in various ways, such as gambling games, balloon-popping tasks, or self-reported questionnaires. They also measured testosterone in different ways: some studies used direct blood or saliva tests, some administered experimental doses of the hormone, and some relied on “morphological proxies” (like the ratio of a person’s index and ring fingers, which is theoretically linked to testosterone exposure in the womb).

    When the researchers aggregated the data, the results showed that the overall association between testosterone levels and risk-taking across all 52 studies was practically zero. In other words, having high or low testosterone did not reliably predict whether a person would take a risk.

    While the overall effect was zero, the data reported by individual studies were very heterogeneous—some studies reported a positive association (higher testosterone – higher risk-taking), while others reported a negative association (higher testosterone – lower risk-taking).

    Further analyses revealed why the results varied so wildly. The researchers found that the method of measurement heavily influenced the outcome. For example, only studies that used lottery-based economic tasks to measure risk-taking showed a modest positive association, while studies measuring risk-taking via other methods (like impulsive games or self-reporting) did not. Similarly, the researchers noted that studies relying on indirect finger measurements sometimes hinted at a link, while highly rigorous studies using direct hormone measurements or administration did not.

    Importantly, the lack of an association between testosterone levels and risk-taking did not depend on sex, meaning the relationship (or lack thereof) was no different in males than in females.

    “Overall, the evidence challenges the notion that testosterone provides a general hormonal basis for human risk preferences,” the study authors concluded. “Instead, findings support a biopsychosocial framework in which ‘risk taking’ reflects the interaction of task demands, cognitive–affective processes, and situational context, with endocrine effects appearing narrow, context-dependent, and method-specific.”

    The study contributes to the scientific knowledge surrounding the behavioral effects of testosterone, suggesting that societal and psychological factors likely play a much larger role in risk-taking than single hormones. However, the study authors note that their search did not yield a sufficient number of appropriate studies to reliably examine the dual-hormone hypothesis (whether a specific interaction between cortisol and testosterone might predict risk-taking).

    The paper, “No relationship between testosterone and risk aversion: A meta-analytic review,” was authored by Irene Sánchez Rodríguez, Luca Bailo, Folco Panizza, Emiliano Ricciardi, and Francesco Bossi.

    URL: psypost.org/the-testosterone-m

    -------------------------------------------------

    DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot

    Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: nationalpsychologist.com

    EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: subscribe-article-digests.clin

    READ ONLINE: read-the-rss-mega-archive.clin

    It's primitive... but it works... mostly...

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #no relationship between testosterone and risk taking #testosterone myth debunked #risk taking meta-analysis #biopsychosocial factors #endocrine effects context dependent #lottery tasks risk study #gender differences risk taking not hormone driven #dual hormone hypothesis inconclusive #testosterone measurement methods matter #neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews study

  5. #Project2025 Is Dead. Long Live Project 2025.

    #Trump, #Vance and the #hateful horizons of “#TradFuturism.”

    by Sarah Riccardi-Swartz July 31, 2024
    Published in #InTheseTimes

    Excerpt: "When news came several weeks ago that Trump had chosen Ohio Sen. #JDVance as his running mate for the 2024 presidential election, my X (formerly Twitter) feed was abuzz with commentary about the selection. Out of the various comments, criticism and praise heaped upon the Hillbilly Elegy author and onetime ​'#NeverTrumper' was the assessment of #DarrellScott, pastor of a Cleveland Heights, Ohio, church ministry and one of Trump’s former spiritual advisors.

    " 'JD Vance is not only the pick for today, but also for the future,' Scott proclaimed. ​'He will be the presumptive nominee for President in 2028, and will keep the #MAGA movement going, retaining Trump as an advisor/​consigleri [sic]. Rubio, Haley, Burgum, Carson, etc wouldn’t.'

    "Scott’s emphasis on MAGA’s future vitality caught my eye as a prime example of a phenomenon I call trad futurism, with the Trump campaign’s selection of Vance serving as part of a world-building project aimed at creating a future for the United States that is not founded on the principles of democracy and freedom but rather on #Identitarian politics and the policing of people and bodies that don’t conform to so-called #TraditionalValues.
    Trad futurism is a moral project that unites ideologically disparate #RightWing groups to craft a world in opposition to secular progressive democracy.

    "What is trad futurism? Trad is shorthand for #traditionalist / #​traditionalism. Recently, there has been broad discussion of far-right groups like ​'trad wives' on TikTok or ​'#RadTrad' young Catholics. Trad futurism is part of that conversation, but it’s not just about a return to the simple life or a Latin Mass. Rather it’s a moral project that unites ideologically disparate right-wing groups to craft a world in opposition to secular progressive #democracy.

    "Right-wing writer #RodDreher’s 2017 book #TheBenedictOption, which urged Christians to withdraw from a corrupted world into cloistered purist communities of the faithful, is one type of trad future: small and local. But some trad futurist projects are far more expansive, aimed at creating a ​'#moral' future for America, in which laws and social policies reflect the ​'traditional values' of conservative Christianity. Throughout the United States, various groups of traditionalists are doing their part to build that world.

    "#ChristianNationalists position their values as American values. Institutions, including the massive #Heritage Foundation and countless otherconservative lobbying groups, are courting right-wing leaders and crafting manifestos for their ideal vision of the country’s future."

    Read more:
    inthesetimes.com/article/proje

    #USPol #Gilead #TradWives #MakeAmericaHateAgain #ChristianNationalism #ChristoFascism

  6. Consiglio di ascoltare questo file audio: conversazione di #JeffreyEpstein con l'ex primo ministro e ex capo dell'intelligence militare di #Israele,#EhudBarak, scoperta ieri da #RyanGrim

    Ne parla oggi Riccardo Antoniucci #FattoQuotidiano (carta):

    bsky.app/profile/ryangrim.bsky

  7. Since we're in a 16th century frame of mind thanks to #BookWormSat, my weird picture of the day is one of Fabrizio Riccardi's illustrations for Rabelais' 'Pantagruel'. Riccardi is a contemporary Italian #surrealist. #weird #weirdart #surrealism #ItalianArt #artsky #Rabelais

  8. La Via della Seta in Sicilia

    La Sicilia ha ospitato per secoli una ricca tradizione tessile, che ha fatto della seta un simbolo di eleganza e maestria artigianale lungo la sua costa settentrionale, da Palermo a Messina, fino ai paesaggi della riviera ionica.

    Le condizioni ambientali favorevoli, unite a un’arte antica di filatura, tessitura e ricamo, hanno creato un legame profondo tra l’isola e la lavorazione della seta, ancora viva grazie all’impegno di artigiani appassionati.

    Dalle sfarzose creazioni della corte normanna, come il manto di Ruggero, fino agli ateliers dell’Albergo dei Poveri di Palermo, la seta siciliana racconta una storia di bellezza, cultura e tradizione che ha attraversato i secoli, lasciando tracce preziose nel tessuto sociale e artistico dell’isola.

    https://www.panormus.blog/articoli.php?id=la-via-della-seta-in-sicilia
    #palermo #panormus #sicilia #sicily #italy #europe #world #picoftheday #picture #image #immagine #photo #photography #fotografia #storia #story #cultura #culture #arte #art #aspassoneltempo #aspassonellastoria #memorie #tradizioni #popolari #vintage #seta

  9. Tallest ancient Roman arches still standing

    Arco di Constantine in Rome – Source: thetrainline.com

    Listed below are the tallest Roman arches that are still standing. As measured to the highest point of the remaining arch structure unless otherwise noted. The list includes triumphant arches, ceremonial arches, gates, and bridges with arched entries, but does not include arches that are part of Roman Aqueducts. If information is located on the 10 arches where height data is needed, they will be moved up into the list. Pax!

    Arco di Titus in Rome – Source: classicist.org

    ——-

    1. Arco di Septimius Severus (203 AD): Rome, Italy = 23 m/75 feet

    2-3. Arco di Constantine (315 AD): Rome, Italy and Arch of Hadrian: Tyre, Lebanon = 21 m/68.9 feet

    4. Triumphal Arch of Orange (27 AD): Orange. France = 19.21 m/63 feet

    5. Arco di Trajan (113 AD): Ancona, Italy = 18.5 m/60.7 feet.

    6. Arch of Hadrian (132 AD): Athens, Greece = 18 m/59 feet

    7. Arco di Janus: Rome, Italy = 16 m/52.5 feet

    8. Arco di Trajan (117 AD): Benevento, Italy = 15.6 m/51.2 feet

    9. Arco di Titus (82 AD): Rome, Italy = 15.4 m/50.5 feet

    10. Arch of Germanicus (19 AD): Saintes, France = 15 m/49.2 feet

    11. South Gate: Anazarbus, Turkiye = 14 m/45.9 feet

    12. Arco di Augustus (8 BC): Susa, Italy = 13.03 m/42.7 feet

    13. Porte de Mars: Reims, France = 13 m/42.6 feet

    14. Arco di Trajan (ca 109): Canosa di Puglia, Italy ~ 13 +/-m/42.6 feet

    15, Arco di Gavi (ca 50 AD): Verona, Italy = 12.69 m/41.6 feet

    16-17. Arch of Caracalla (216 AD): Djémila, Algeria and Arch of Galerius (299 AD): Thessaloniki, Greece = 12.5 m/41.5 feet

    18. Arc de Berà (ca 13 BC): Roda de Berà, Spain = 12.3 m/40.3 feet

    19. Triumphal Arch of Septimius Severus (183 AD): Latakia, Syria = 12.2 m/40 feet

    20-21. Arch of Trajan: Timgad, Algeria and Arco di Glanum (25 AD): Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, France = 12 m/

    22. Arco di Augustus (25 BC): Aosta, Italy ~ 11.4+ m/37.4 feet

    23. Porte Noire (175 AD): Besançon, France = 11.2 m/36.7 feet

    24. Arch of Hadrian (130 AD): Jerash, Jordan = 11 m/36.1 feet

    25. Arch of Caracalla (211-214 AD): Tébessa, Algeria = 10.94 m/35.9 feet

    26-27. Arco di Hadrian: Capua, Italy and Arch of Carpentras (19 AD): Carpentras, France = 10 m/32.8 feet

    28. Arch of Campanus: Aix-les-Bains, France = 9.15 m/30 feet

    29. Arco di Gallienus (262 AD): Roma, Italy = 8.8 m/28.9 feet

    30. Roman Arch of Medinaceli: Medinaceli, Spain = 8.1 m/26.6 feet

    31-33. Hadrian’s Gate: Antalya, Tukiye; Heidentor (361 AD): Petronell-Carnuntum, Austria; and Arch of the Sergii (27 BC): Pula, Crotia = 8 m/26.2 feet

    34. Arco di Drusus (9 BC): Rome, Italy ~ 7.21+ m/23.7 feet

    35. Arco di Riccardo (33 BC): Trieste, Italy ~ 7.2 m/23.6 feet

    36. Pont Flavien (ca 12 BC): Saint-Chamas, France = 7 m/23 feet x 2 arches

    37. Arch of Cabanes: Castellón de la Plana, Spain = 5.8 m/19 feet

    Need More Information:

    Arco di Drusus (Spoleto)

    Arco di Marcus Aurelius

    Arco di Mark Anthony

    Triumphal Arco di Tiberius

    Arch of Septimius Severus: Khoms, Libya

    Arch of Marcus Aurelius: Tripoli, Libya

    Arch of Caracalla: Morocco

    Arch of Alexander Severus: Dougga, Tunisia

    Arch of Septimius Severus: Dougga, Tunisia

    Triumphal Arch of the Tetrarchy: Tunisia

    SOURCES:

    #acros #ancient #arches #arcs #cities #conservations #design #geology #geometry #history #Italy #landUse #planning #preservation #RomanEmpire #Rome #travel

  10. Tallest ancient Roman arches still standing

    Arco di Constantine in Rome – Source: thetrainline.com

    Listed below are the tallest Roman arches that are still standing. As measured to the highest point of the remaining arch structure unless otherwise noted. The list includes triumphant arches, ceremonial arches, gates, and bridges with arched entries, but does not include arches that are part of Roman Aqueducts. If information is located on the 10 arches where height data is needed, they will be moved up into the list. Pax!

    Arco di Titus in Rome – Source: classicist.org

    ——-

    1. Arco di Septimius Severus (203 AD): Rome, Italy = 23 m/75 feet

    2-3. Arco di Constantine (315 AD): Rome, Italy and Arch of Hadrian: Tyre, Lebanon = 21 m/68.9 feet

    4. Triumphal Arch of Orange (27 AD): Orange. France = 19.21 m/63 feet

    5. Arco di Trajan (113 AD): Ancona, Italy = 18.5 m/60.7 feet.

    6. Arch of Hadrian (132 AD): Athens, Greece = 18 m/59 feet

    7. Arco di Janus: Rome, Italy = 16 m/52.5 feet

    8. Arco di Trajan (117 AD): Benevento, Italy = 15.6 m/51.2 feet

    9. Arco di Titus (82 AD): Rome, Italy = 15.4 m/50.5 feet

    10. Arch of Germanicus (19 AD): Saintes, France = 15 m/49.2 feet

    11. South Gate: Anazarbus, Turkiye = 14 m/45.9 feet

    12. Arco di Augustus (8 BC): Susa, Italy = 13.03 m/42.7 feet

    13. Porte de Mars: Reims, France = 13 m/42.6 feet

    14. Arco di Trajan (ca 109): Canosa di Puglia, Italy ~ 13 +/-m/42.6 feet

    15, Arco di Gavi (ca 50 AD): Verona, Italy = 12.69 m/41.6 feet

    16-17. Arch of Caracalla (216 AD): Djémila, Algeria and Arch of Galerius (299 AD): Thessaloniki, Greece = 12.5 m/41.5 feet

    18. Arc de Berà (ca 13 BC): Roda de Berà, Spain = 12.3 m/40.3 feet

    19. Triumphal Arch of Septimius Severus (183 AD): Latakia, Syria = 12.2 m/40 feet

    20-21. Arch of Trajan: Timgad, Algeria and Arco di Glanum (25 AD): Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, France = 12 m/

    22. Arco di Augustus (25 BC): Aosta, Italy ~ 11.4+ m/37.4 feet

    23. Porte Noire (175 AD): Besançon, France = 11.2 m/36.7 feet

    24. Arch of Hadrian (130 AD): Jerash, Jordan = 11 m/36.1 feet

    25. Arch of Caracalla (211-214 AD): Tébessa, Algeria = 10.94 m/35.9 feet

    26-27. Arco di Hadrian: Capua, Italy and Arch of Carpentras (19 AD): Carpentras, France = 10 m/32.8 feet

    28. Arch of Campanus: Aix-les-Bains, France = 9.15 m/30 feet

    29. Arco di Gallienus (262 AD): Roma, Italy = 8.8 m/28.9 feet

    30. Roman Arch of Medinaceli: Medinaceli, Spain = 8.1 m/26.6 feet

    31-33. Hadrian’s Gate: Antalya, Tukiye; Heidentor (361 AD): Petronell-Carnuntum, Austria; and Arch of the Sergii (27 BC): Pula, Crotia = 8 m/26.2 feet

    34. Arco di Drusus (9 BC): Rome, Italy ~ 7.21+ m/23.7 feet

    35. Arco di Riccardo (33 BC): Trieste, Italy ~ 7.2 m/23.6 feet

    36. Pont Flavien (ca 12 BC): Saint-Chamas, France = 7 m/23 feet x 2 arches

    37. Arch of Cabanes: Castellón de la Plana, Spain = 5.8 m/19 feet

    Need More Information:

    Arco di Drusus (Spoleto)

    Arco di Marcus Aurelius

    Arco di Mark Anthony

    Triumphal Arco di Tiberius

    Arch of Septimius Severus: Khoms, Libya

    Arch of Marcus Aurelius: Tripoli, Libya

    Arch of Caracalla: Morocco

    Arch of Alexander Severus: Dougga, Tunisia

    Arch of Septimius Severus: Dougga, Tunisia

    Triumphal Arch of the Tetrarchy: Tunisia

    SOURCES:

    #acros #ancient #arches #arcs #cities #conservations #design #geology #geometry #history #Italy #landUse #planning #preservation #RomanEmpire #Rome #travel

  11. Tallest ancient Roman arches still standing

    Arco di Constantine in Rome – Source: thetrainline.com

    Listed below are the tallest Roman arches that are still standing. As measured to the highest point of the remaining arch structure unless otherwise noted. The list includes triumphant arches, ceremonial arches, gates, and bridges with arched entries, but does not include arches that are part of Roman Aqueducts. If information is located on the 10 arches where height data is needed, they will be moved up into the list. Pax!

    Arco di Titus in Rome – Source: classicist.org

    ——-

    1. Arco di Septimius Severus (203 AD): Rome, Italy = 23 m/75 feet

    2-3. Arco di Constantine (315 AD): Rome, Italy and Arch of Hadrian: Tyre, Lebanon = 21 m/68.9 feet

    4. Triumphal Arch of Orange (27 AD): Orange. France = 19.21 m/63 feet

    5. Arco di Trajan (113 AD): Ancona, Italy = 18.5 m/60.7 feet.

    6. Arch of Hadrian (132 AD): Athens, Greece = 18 m/59 feet

    7. Arco di Janus: Rome, Italy = 16 m/52.5 feet

    8. Arco di Trajan (117 AD): Benevento, Italy = 15.6 m/51.2 feet

    9. Arco di Titus (82 AD): Rome, Italy = 15.4 m/50.5 feet

    10. Arch of Germanicus (19 AD): Saintes, France = 15 m/49.2 feet

    11. South Gate: Anazarbus, Turkiye = 14 m/45.9 feet

    12. Arco di Augustus (8 BC): Susa, Italy = 13.03 m/42.7 feet

    13. Porte de Mars: Reims, France = 13 m/42.6 feet

    14. Arco di Trajan (ca 109): Canosa di Puglia, Italy ~ 13 +/-m/42.6 feet

    15, Arco di Gavi (ca 50 AD): Verona, Italy = 12.69 m/41.6 feet

    16-17. Arch of Caracalla (216 AD): Djémila, Algeria and Arch of Galerius (299 AD): Thessaloniki, Greece = 12.5 m/41.5 feet

    18. Arc de Berà (ca 13 BC): Roda de Berà, Spain = 12.3 m/40.3 feet

    19. Triumphal Arch of Septimius Severus (183 AD): Latakia, Syria = 12.2 m/40 feet

    20-21. Arch of Trajan: Timgad, Algeria and Arco di Glanum (25 AD): Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, France = 12 m/

    22. Arco di Augustus (25 BC): Aosta, Italy ~ 11.4+ m/37.4 feet

    23. Porte Noire (175 AD): Besançon, France = 11.2 m/36.7 feet

    24. Arch of Hadrian (130 AD): Jerash, Jordan = 11 m/36.1 feet

    25. Arch of Caracalla (211-214 AD): Tébessa, Algeria = 10.94 m/35.9 feet

    26-27. Arco di Hadrian: Capua, Italy and Arch of Carpentras (19 AD): Carpentras, France = 10 m/32.8 feet

    28. Arch of Campanus: Aix-les-Bains, France = 9.15 m/30 feet

    29. Arco di Gallienus (262 AD): Roma, Italy = 8.8 m/28.9 feet

    30. Roman Arch of Medinaceli: Medinaceli, Spain = 8.1 m/26.6 feet

    31-33. Hadrian’s Gate: Antalya, Tukiye; Heidentor (361 AD): Petronell-Carnuntum, Austria; and Arch of the Sergii (27 BC): Pula, Crotia = 8 m/26.2 feet

    34. Arco di Drusus (9 BC): Rome, Italy ~ 7.21+ m/23.7 feet

    35. Arco di Riccardo (33 BC): Trieste, Italy ~ 7.2 m/23.6 feet

    36. Pont Flavien (ca 12 BC): Saint-Chamas, France = 7 m/23 feet x 2 arches

    37. Arch of Cabanes: Castellón de la Plana, Spain = 5.8 m/19 feet

    Need More Information:

    Arco di Drusus (Spoleto)

    Arco di Marcus Aurelius

    Arco di Mark Anthony

    Triumphal Arco di Tiberius

    Arch of Septimius Severus: Khoms, Libya

    Arch of Marcus Aurelius: Tripoli, Libya

    Arch of Caracalla: Morocco

    Arch of Alexander Severus: Dougga, Tunisia

    Arch of Septimius Severus: Dougga, Tunisia

    Triumphal Arch of the Tetrarchy: Tunisia

    SOURCES:

    #acros #ancient #arches #arcs #cities #conservations #design #geology #geometry #history #Italy #landUse #planning #preservation #RomanEmpire #Rome #travel

  12. Tallest ancient Roman arches still standing

    Arco di Constantine in Rome – Source: thetrainline.com

    Listed below are the tallest Roman arches that are still standing. As measured to the highest point of the remaining arch structure unless otherwise noted. The list includes triumphant arches, ceremonial arches, gates, and bridges with arched entries, but does not include arches that are part of Roman Aqueducts. If information is located on the 10 arches where height data is needed, they will be moved up into the list. Pax!

    Arco di Titus in Rome – Source: classicist.org

    ——-

    1. Arco di Septimius Severus (203 AD): Rome, Italy = 23 m/75 feet

    2-3. Arco di Constantine (315 AD): Rome, Italy and Arch of Hadrian: Tyre, Lebanon = 21 m/68.9 feet

    4. Triumphal Arch of Orange (27 AD): Orange. France = 19.21 m/63 feet

    5. Arco di Trajan (113 AD): Ancona, Italy = 18.5 m/60.7 feet.

    6. Arch of Hadrian (132 AD): Athens, Greece = 18 m/59 feet

    7. Arco di Janus: Rome, Italy = 16 m/52.5 feet

    8. Arco di Trajan (117 AD): Benevento, Italy = 15.6 m/51.2 feet

    9. Arco di Titus (82 AD): Rome, Italy = 15.4 m/50.5 feet

    10. Arch of Germanicus (19 AD): Saintes, France = 15 m/49.2 feet

    11. South Gate: Anazarbus, Turkiye = 14 m/45.9 feet

    12. Arco di Augustus (8 BC): Susa, Italy = 13.03 m/42.7 feet

    13. Porte de Mars: Reims, France = 13 m/42.6 feet

    14. Arco di Trajan (ca 109): Canosa di Puglia, Italy ~ 13 +/-m/42.6 feet

    15, Arco di Gavi (ca 50 AD): Verona, Italy = 12.69 m/41.6 feet

    16-17. Arch of Caracalla (216 AD): Djémila, Algeria and Arch of Galerius (299 AD): Thessaloniki, Greece = 12.5 m/41.5 feet

    18. Arc de Berà (ca 13 BC): Roda de Berà, Spain = 12.3 m/40.3 feet

    19. Triumphal Arch of Septimius Severus (183 AD): Latakia, Syria = 12.2 m/40 feet

    20-21. Arch of Trajan: Timgad, Algeria and Arco di Glanum (25 AD): Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, France = 12 m/

    22. Arco di Augustus (25 BC): Aosta, Italy ~ 11.4+ m/37.4 feet

    23. Porte Noire (175 AD): Besançon, France = 11.2 m/36.7 feet

    24. Arch of Hadrian (130 AD): Jerash, Jordan = 11 m/36.1 feet

    25. Arch of Caracalla (211-214 AD): Tébessa, Algeria = 10.94 m/35.9 feet

    26-27. Arco di Hadrian: Capua, Italy and Arch of Carpentras (19 AD): Carpentras, France = 10 m/32.8 feet

    28. Arch of Campanus: Aix-les-Bains, France = 9.15 m/30 feet

    29. Arco di Gallienus (262 AD): Roma, Italy = 8.8 m/28.9 feet

    30. Roman Arch of Medinaceli: Medinaceli, Spain = 8.1 m/26.6 feet

    31-33. Hadrian’s Gate: Antalya, Tukiye; Heidentor (361 AD): Petronell-Carnuntum, Austria; and Arch of the Sergii (27 BC): Pula, Crotia = 8 m/26.2 feet

    34. Arco di Drusus (9 BC): Rome, Italy ~ 7.21+ m/23.7 feet

    35. Arco di Riccardo (33 BC): Trieste, Italy ~ 7.2 m/23.6 feet

    36. Pont Flavien (ca 12 BC): Saint-Chamas, France = 7 m/23 feet x 2 arches

    37. Arch of Cabanes: Castellón de la Plana, Spain = 5.8 m/19 feet

    Need More Information:

    Arco di Drusus (Spoleto)

    Arco di Marcus Aurelius

    Arco di Mark Anthony

    Triumphal Arco di Tiberius

    Arch of Septimius Severus: Khoms, Libya

    Arch of Marcus Aurelius: Tripoli, Libya

    Arch of Caracalla: Morocco

    Arch of Alexander Severus: Dougga, Tunisia

    Arch of Septimius Severus: Dougga, Tunisia

    Triumphal Arch of the Tetrarchy: Tunisia

    SOURCES:

    #acros #ancient #arches #arcs #cities #conservations #design #geology #geometry #history #Italy #landUse #planning #preservation #RomanEmpire #Rome #travel

  13. 📸 Bing wallpaper of the day:

    Great Barrier Reef from above, Queensland, Australia (© Francesco Riccardo Iacomino/Getty Images)

    📲 Daily Wallpaper for iOS/Mac dailywallpaperapp.com/appstore

    #photography #wallpapers #bing

  14. @Rob Ricci @caterpillar @Stefan Bohacek @Ericka Simone This is exactly the problem.

    I'm on both Hubzilla and (streams) with multiple channels, and I've been on Hubzilla under various guises for longer than the vast majority of Mastodon users have been on Mastodon. I guess you can say that I know both very well.

    I can tell you that the possibilities of Hubzilla's permissions system are staggering. It works on up to three levels: for the entire channel (that's "account" in Mastospeak), for individual connections (that's "followers and followed" in Mastospeak), for individual content (posts and and entire conversations, but also images and other uploaded files and documents).

    For example, you can grant or deny permission to
    • see your public profile (this requires OpenWebAuth magic sign-on which Mastodon has rejected)
    • see your connections (this requires OpenWebAuth magic sign-on which Mastodon has rejected)
    • see your public posts in your stream (this requires OpenWebAuth magic sign-on which Mastodon has rejected)
    • send you their posts (this means public posts that aren't replies because replies are not posts on Hubzilla)
    • like (that's "fave" in Mastospeak; you know, the star), dislike and comment on your posts
    • send you DMs
    • see your uploaded files (this requires OpenWebAuth magic sign-on which Mastodon has rejected, but this also extends to images and other media embedded into posts, comments and DMs)

    All in all, Hubzilla has 18 such permissions, but these are the ones that matter from a Mastodon point of view. They can be granted or denied for your entire channel at seven or eight levels, and if they're denied at channel level, they can be granted for individual connections. Imagine that, on Mastodon, you could allow only certain followers to see your profile and your toots. Or you could only allow certain followed accounts to send you their toots. All of this is reality on Hubzilla right now.

    Better yet: You know that you can send toots only to mentioned accounts on Mastodon. Hubzilla exceeds and improves upon this in three ways. First of all, you can send posts to individual connections. Or to a certain privacy group (from a Mastodon POV, that's a list on steroids). Or to a custom selection of individual connections and privacy groups while even being able to exclude certain other connections or privacy groups. This goes way beyond Mastodon's "mentioned = allowed to see".

    But this doesn't only define who will receive your post. It also defines who is permitted to see your post.

    And: The permissions of a post are inherited by the entire conversation. Comments always have the same permissions as the top post. There's no restricting the permissions in a comment, and there's no relaxing the limitations of a comment. It's impossible to pull other Fediverse users into a private conversation by mentioning them if the top post wasn't targetted at them.

    Even better yet: You can allow or disallow comments on individual posts (remember that a post on Hubzilla is only a post if it starts a conversation, not if it's a reply).

    On top of all this, Hubzilla's filters are both vastly more powerful than Mastodon's filters and easier to use. Mastodon requires you to set up one new filter for each word that you want filtered. It's always blocklisting. And it's always account-wide.

    Hubzilla covers Mastodon's entire filter functionality with one or two text fields. You have one blocklist for the whole channel. And you have an optional extra feature named "NSFW" with its own filter list that generated individual, reader-side content warnings for you. The equivalent of defining a new filter on Mastodon is to add a new line to one of these filter lists. Want to back them up? Just copy-paste them into a text file.

    But wait, there's more: Hubzilla also has a channel-wide allowlist. If you only want to see certain content in your stream, you can allowlist certain keywords.

    Hubzilla even optionally has one blocklist and one allowlist per connection. Imagine you could filter individual followed accounts on Mastodon.

    Hubzilla's filter lists support regular expressions. There is also a "filter syntax" that lets you filter by whether a message is a top post or not, whether a message is public or private, whether it's a repeat (that's "boost" in Mastospeak or "retoot" for those of you who still have Twitter on the brain). The filter syntax even lets you use Boolean operators.

    (streams) and Forte are similar. Their permissions are somewhat different (you don't need permissions for wikis and websites if you don't have wikis and websites). The permissions system is vastly easier to use because it's no longer template-based. You can simply switch permissions on and off for your channel as well as for connections. And you can choose to have even more options for reply control.

    Again, all this exists in the Fediverse right now. And most of it has existed for longer than Mastodon. Some of this dates back to the earliest days of Friendica in May, 2010.

    Unfortunately, next to nobody knows.

    For most Mastodon features, the features that Mastodon has are the features that the Fediverse has. If Mastodon doesn't have it, the Fediverse doesn't. Not only is Mastodon the default, but there's nothing that strays from this default. That's why Mastodon users keep wishing for "the Fediverse" to introduce features which Friendica has had for almost 16 years already. Or which Hubzilla has had for over a decade.

    In addition, probably not even 10% of all Mastodon users have ever heard of Hubzilla. Probably not even 1% of all Mastodon users know what Hubzilla can do. And even only the existence of (streams) and Forte is almost entirely unknown outside of (streams) and Forte themselves and Hubzilla.

    #Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #CW #CWs #CWMeta #ContentWarning #ContentWarnings #ContentWarningMeta #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Permission #Permissions #ReplyControl #ReplyControls #Filter #Filters #MastodonCentricism #MastodonNormativity
  15. New #openaccess publication #SciPost #Physics

    Physical and unphysical regimes of self-consistent many-body perturbation theory

    Kris Van Houcke, Evgeny Kozik, Riccardo Rossi, Youjin Deng, Félix Werner
    SciPost Phys. 16, 133 (2024)
    scipost.org/SciPostPhys.16.5.1

    #LPENS #KCL @sorbonne_univ_ #EPFL #FlatironInstitute #USTC #LKB
    #ScienceTechnologyCommissionShanghaiMunicipality

  16. Great Barrier Reef from above, Queensland, Australia
    © Francesco Riccardo Iacomino/Getty Images
    #GreatBarrierReef #Queensland #Australia #photography