#h1bvisas — Public Fediverse posts

😂OMG, a Y Combinator partner said something mildly controversial about H1B visas, and the internet went full Sherlock Holmes without any actual evidence! 🔍 But don't worry, folks, we can rely on the ever-trustworthy echo chamber of social media rumors. 🎭 Where would we be without complete and utter chaos?
https://www.ababnews.com/news/a626cd7e-5749-414f-a159-d204f221e2be #H1Bvisas #YCombinator #SocialMediaRumors #Controversy #InternetChaos #SherlockHolmes #HackerNews #ngated

Bill Gates Is Warning Us About AI. Before We Panic, Remember Bill Gates.

By Cliff Potts, Editor-in-Chief, WPS News

BAYBAY CITY, Philippines — August 27, 2026

Bill Gates is worried about artificial intelligence taking people’s jobs.

There is a certain historical irony in that sentence that should not be ignored.

The Microsoft co-founder has published a nearly 6,000-word warning arguing that artificial intelligence could eliminate enormous numbers of jobs, destabilize society, enable cybercrime and biological threats, damage childhood development, and produce what he describes as either an extraordinary equalizer or an extraordinary source of injustice (Gates, 2026).

Some of those concerns are legitimate.

But before anyone appoints Bill Gates the patron saint of endangered American workers, there is some history worth remembering.

Bill Gates Wasn’t Always This Worried About Replacing American Technology Workers

During the 2000s, Gates became one of corporate America’s most prominent advocates for dramatically expanding the H-1B visa program, which allows American companies to employ foreign workers in specialized occupations.

In congressional testimony in 2007 and 2008, Gates argued that the existing 65,000-visa base cap was inadequate and that American technology companies needed greater access to foreign scientists and engineers. In 2007, he said he favored essentially unlimited access to highly skilled foreign workers, although he acknowledged that such a policy might not be politically achievable (Gross, 2007; Gates, 2008).

Gates and Microsoft argued that this was about finding talent unavailable in sufficient numbers domestically.

Critics saw something considerably less benevolent.

They argued that H-1B expansion gave technology companies access to workers who could sometimes be employed for less than comparable American professionals, depressing wages and increasing competition faced by American programmers and engineers. Contemporary reporting noted that critics in Congress explicitly accused the program of displacing Americans and suppressing technology wages (Kessler, 2008).

Senator Chuck Grassley challenged Gates directly after his 2008 congressional testimony, arguing that expanding the program without reform would not adequately protect qualified American workers (Grassley, 2008).

And there was another uncomfortable fact.

Microsoft was simultaneously expanding overseas.

In 2003, Microsoft acknowledged that it was shifting some technical support and development work from the United States to India as part of an effort to reduce costs. The company was increasing its Indian workforce while considering reductions in the United States (Wired, 2003).

That does not prove that Bill Gates personally embarked upon some campaign to destroy American information-technology employment.

It does establish something much less sensational and considerably more important: Gates spent years advocating labor and corporate policies that many American technology workers believed threatened their jobs and wages.

That history matters when the same man now warns us that technology may replace workers.

Now Gates Wants to Protect Human Jobs

Gates’ latest proposal is almost breathtaking when placed beside that history.

He suggests governments may eventually need to designate certain occupations or tasks as “Human Reserved”—work that machines would deliberately be prevented from taking over even if artificial intelligence became capable of performing it.

He has also proposed taxing robots and AI usage partly to reduce the financial incentive for companies to replace human labor with machines and partly to finance retraining and social protections for displaced workers (Gates, 2026; Fried, 2026).

Read that again.

One of the men who spent years arguing that American technology companies needed access to a much larger international labor pool is now suggesting that government may need to intervene to prevent technology companies from replacing human workers.

Perhaps Gates has changed his mind.

People are allowed to do that.

Perhaps artificial intelligence genuinely presents a labor-market threat fundamentally different from globalization, outsourcing or immigration.

There is considerable reason to believe that it does.

But skepticism is not unreasonable.

And Then There Is the Money Question

There is another question WPS News believes readers are entitled to ask:

Why now?

One possible cynical interpretation is that Gates has concluded that the economics of artificial intelligence are not developing the way he expected and is now discovering the virtues of restraint.

There is presently no evidence establishing that explanation.

In fact, the available evidence complicates it substantially. Microsoft remains deeply invested in artificial intelligence and maintains a major strategic and financial relationship with OpenAI. Microsoft’s latest annual filing says it continues making significant investments in AI products and services and remains entitled to revenue-sharing payments through its OpenAI partnership (Microsoft, 2026).

Gates himself is no longer running Microsoft day to day, so Microsoft’s corporate interests should not simply be treated as Gates’ personal financial interests.

Nevertheless, the question of incentives is legitimate.

When enormously wealthy technology figures warn society about technologies produced by the industry that made them enormously wealthy, journalists should examine both the warning and the interests surrounding the person delivering it.

That isn’t conspiracy theory.

That’s journalism.

Some of Gates’ Warnings Are Still Right

None of this means Gates is wrong about artificial intelligence.

He may be spectacularly right.

AI can automate cognitive work in a way earlier machinery generally could not. Gates specifically identifies law, medicine, customer service, software and manufacturing among the fields likely to experience disruption. He believes AI-driven robotics will eventually extend that disruption further into physical occupations (Gates, 2026).

He is also warning about AI-assisted cyberattacks, biological weapons, fraud and other deliberate misuse.

Those are real problems.

And Gates’ argument that society should consider protecting certain human occupations rather than blindly accepting every economically efficient automation deserves serious discussion.

But so does Gates’ record.

Technology Billionaires Don’t Suddenly Become Disinterested Observers

Silicon Valley has spent decades telling workers that disruption is progress.

Your factory closes? Progress.

Your job goes overseas? Progress.

Foreign labor can perform your job for less? Global competitiveness.

Software eliminates your department? Innovation.

An algorithm eliminates your profession?

Suddenly we’re discussing protecting human employment.

American information-technology professionals who lived through outsourcing, offshoring and the H-1B battles of the 1990s and 2000s could reasonably be forgiven for raising an eyebrow.

Bill Gates deserves to be heard.

He does not deserve to be heard without context.

The Warning May Be Correct Even If We Distrust the Messenger

That is ultimately where this story becomes more interesting than “Bill Gates says AI is dangerous.”

Artificial intelligence is potentially dangerous.

Massive employment displacement is possible. Cybersecurity threats are real. Biological misuse deserves serious government attention. Children probably should not be raised primarily by artificial companions. And governments are nowhere near adequately prepared for the economic transformation that increasingly capable machines could produce.

Gates may therefore be right about the problem.

But being right today does not erase yesterday.

His history of championing expanded access to foreign technology labor—and Microsoft’s history of shifting some American technical work overseas—belongs in any serious assessment of his newfound concern about protecting human workers.

And the possibility that economic interests influence the changing positions of billionaires should always be investigated rather than politely ignored.

We cannot presently establish that Gates is warning about AI because he has decided he cannot make enough money from it. The evidence does not support stating that as fact.

We can, however, ask the question.

We can examine his interests.

We can remember his history.

And we can refuse to accept either Silicon Valley’s AI evangelists or its newly worried elder statesmen as unquestionable authorities on what is best for everybody else.

The machines deserve scrutiny.

So do the men who built the industry that created them.

References

Fried, I. (2026, August 26). Bill Gates wants to keep some jobs off-limits to AI. Axios.

Gates, B. (2008, March 12). Written testimony before the Committee on Science and Technology, United States House of Representatives. U.S. House Committee on Science and Technology.

Gates, B. (2026, August 26). The turbulent AI era is here: The choices we make now are critical. Gates Notes.

Grassley, C. (2008, March 12). Grassley to Gates: Solution isn’t importing more foreign workers. United States Senate.

Gross, G. (2007, March 7). Gates: Tech needs more immigrant visas. InfoWorld.

Kessler, M. (2008, March 13). Bill Gates urges more visas for tech workers. USA Today.

Microsoft Corporation. (2026). Annual report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Wired. (2003, July 3). Microsoft cuts U.S. jobs. Wired.

🚨 BREAKING: A judge just blocked a $100K fee on H1B visas, ensuring Silicon Valley can continue importing their favorite commodity: cheap labor! 💼💸 Meanwhile, the rest of us are left wondering if there's any fee high enough to save us from this endless cycle of economic brilliance. 🙄🌍
https://www.alaskasnewssource.com/2026/06/08/federal-judge-blocks-h1-b-visa-100k-fee/ #H1Bvisas #SiliconValley #cheaplabor #economicbrilliance #technews #HackerNews #ngated

Your Job Was Stopping CSAM? Trump Says No Visa For You!

https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.techdirt.com/2025/12/08/your-job-was-stopping-csam-trump-says-no-visa-for-you/

China’s new K visa aimed at attracting foreign tech talent has triggered backlash, revealing public frustration with job scarcity and a faltering property market. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2025/10/15/world/china-visa-deepseek-illusion/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=mastodon #commentary #worldnews #china #tech #immigration #jobs #h1bvisas #kvisas

Every fifth person pursuing a STEM career in the U.S. is foreign-born. Many will be already weighing rival offers pitching for young talent. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2025/09/26/world/us-h-1b-visa-reset-to-hurt-colleges/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=mastodon #commentary #worldnews #donaldtrump #immigration #h1bvisas #workers #useconomy #india

The #Trump administration’s new $100,000 fee for #H1Bvisas, a significant increase from the previous $2,000 to $5,000, could hinder #startups’ ability to secure top foreign talent. While some tech executives support the changes, experts warn that it could drive talent to other countries, potentially benefiting competitors like #China and #India. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/24/trumps-h-1b-visa-changes-could-kneecap-startups-experts-say.html?eicker.news #tech #media #news

Ah, the classic "less immigrants, more jobs" #fallacy 🤦‍♂️. Turns out blocking H-1B visas didn't magically create jobs for locals—shocking! Who knew that complex economies don't adhere to simplistic nativist fantasies? 😂
https://www.nber.org/digest/dec17/fewer-h-1b-visas-did-not-mean-more-employment-natives #lessImmigrantsMoreJobs #H1Bvisas #economicComplexity #nativistMyths #jobMarketReality #HackerNews #ngated

Tech giants Amazon, Google, Microsoft reportedly tell H-1B workers to stay in the U.S. after the White House announced a $100K fee for applications. Read more from @Techcrunch:

https://flip.it/DGoy8M

#Tech #Google #Amazon #Microsoft #H1BVisas #Trump

💸💻 Behold the true cost of H1B visas: $100k/year... if you can ever access the information behind an impregnable wall of cookies and #Cloudflare blocks. 🛑🔒 Clearly, the tech world is under attack by vicious SQL commands, or maybe just a few too many broken web pages. 😂🙄
https://www.boundless.com/blog/trump-administration-to-propose-new-100000-fee-for-h-1b-visa-applications/ #H1Bvisas #TechIndustry #WebSecurity #SQLInjection #HackerNews #ngated

Tech companies are telling immigrant employees on visas not to leave the U.S.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/03/31/immigration-h1b-fear-siliconvalley/

#HackerNews #TechImmigration #VisaIssues #SiliconValley #EmployeeRights #H1BVisas #ImmigrationPolicy

@shantini
Just wanted to chime in on behalf of TechHub Moderation.

H1B Holders are PEOPLE, not policy.

Simply being against the POLICY of issuing #H1Bvisas is not something we can do anything about as moderators: discussion of immigration law is protected political speech, and legitimate conversation. However, it is NOT ok for anyone to attack #H1B Holders themselves, and especially not to refer to them as "H1Bs".

H1B holders are just workers trying to get by, following the rules and getting a legal #visa through legitimate means. Even if the government is issuing too many, and even though companies will always try to exploit them, these people do not have power here and this is in no way their fault.

"They" are not "actively harming" anyone. The System is.

Hate Speech against H1B holders themselves, or ANY group of #immigrants, is not allowed on TechHub, or the mainstream Fediverse in general, and will be dealt with accordingly.

Just wanted to make that clear.

- #TechHub #Moderation

Liar-In-Chief strikes again.

As a businessman, Trump just praised the visa program. "I have many H-1B visas on my properties, I've been a believer in H-1B. I have used it many times. It's a great program."

As a politician, he has criticized it. In 2016, #Trump called the program “very bad” and “unfair” for U.S. workers. Three months after taking office, he issued an executive order that directed changes to ensure that #h1bvisas were awarded to “superior” candidates.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-backs-immigration-visas-skilled-154005820.html

»#Conservativecritics of #ElonMusk are alleging #censorship and claiming they were stripped of their verification badges on #XTwitter after challenging his views on #H1Bvisas.« https://www.axios.com/2024/12/27/musk-x-loomer-h1b-maga-verification?eicker.news #tech #media

"In 2013, a billboard was erected in Silicon Valley with a blunt invitation to immigrant STEM workers:

“H-1B Problems?” it stated.

“Pivot to Canada.”

"The billboard was part of a targeted campaign by the Canadian government to attract disaffected immigrant STEM workers to Canada.

"The campaign worked."

https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/3843282-canada-regularly-poaches-us-immigrant-tech-talent-mexico-could-be-next/

"From 2006 to 2012, Mexico opened 120 tuition-free specialist technology universities."

| #CanadianImmigration #CanadianTech #Canada #H1BVisas #H1BVisa #H1B #Mexico

Alcion.ai is #hiring engineers and someone to lead growth marketing!

For those looking for #jobs and/or impacted by #layoffs, we are still hiring! We are a remote-only and well-funded #startup, are looking for backend and distributed systems engineers around the globe, we sponsor and transfer #h1bvisas for folks in the US, and would love to have you apply!

https://jobs.lever.co/alcion