#technology-industry — Public Fediverse posts

Bill Gates Is Warning Us About AI. Before We Panic, Remember Bill Gates.

By Cliff Potts, Editor-in-Chief, WPS News

BAYBAY CITY, Philippines — August 27, 2026

Bill Gates is worried about artificial intelligence taking people’s jobs.

There is a certain historical irony in that sentence that should not be ignored.

The Microsoft co-founder has published a nearly 6,000-word warning arguing that artificial intelligence could eliminate enormous numbers of jobs, destabilize society, enable cybercrime and biological threats, damage childhood development, and produce what he describes as either an extraordinary equalizer or an extraordinary source of injustice (Gates, 2026).

Some of those concerns are legitimate.

But before anyone appoints Bill Gates the patron saint of endangered American workers, there is some history worth remembering.

Bill Gates Wasn’t Always This Worried About Replacing American Technology Workers

During the 2000s, Gates became one of corporate America’s most prominent advocates for dramatically expanding the H-1B visa program, which allows American companies to employ foreign workers in specialized occupations.

In congressional testimony in 2007 and 2008, Gates argued that the existing 65,000-visa base cap was inadequate and that American technology companies needed greater access to foreign scientists and engineers. In 2007, he said he favored essentially unlimited access to highly skilled foreign workers, although he acknowledged that such a policy might not be politically achievable (Gross, 2007; Gates, 2008).

Gates and Microsoft argued that this was about finding talent unavailable in sufficient numbers domestically.

Critics saw something considerably less benevolent.

They argued that H-1B expansion gave technology companies access to workers who could sometimes be employed for less than comparable American professionals, depressing wages and increasing competition faced by American programmers and engineers. Contemporary reporting noted that critics in Congress explicitly accused the program of displacing Americans and suppressing technology wages (Kessler, 2008).

Senator Chuck Grassley challenged Gates directly after his 2008 congressional testimony, arguing that expanding the program without reform would not adequately protect qualified American workers (Grassley, 2008).

And there was another uncomfortable fact.

Microsoft was simultaneously expanding overseas.

In 2003, Microsoft acknowledged that it was shifting some technical support and development work from the United States to India as part of an effort to reduce costs. The company was increasing its Indian workforce while considering reductions in the United States (Wired, 2003).

That does not prove that Bill Gates personally embarked upon some campaign to destroy American information-technology employment.

It does establish something much less sensational and considerably more important: Gates spent years advocating labor and corporate policies that many American technology workers believed threatened their jobs and wages.

That history matters when the same man now warns us that technology may replace workers.

Now Gates Wants to Protect Human Jobs

Gates’ latest proposal is almost breathtaking when placed beside that history.

He suggests governments may eventually need to designate certain occupations or tasks as “Human Reserved”—work that machines would deliberately be prevented from taking over even if artificial intelligence became capable of performing it.

He has also proposed taxing robots and AI usage partly to reduce the financial incentive for companies to replace human labor with machines and partly to finance retraining and social protections for displaced workers (Gates, 2026; Fried, 2026).

Read that again.

One of the men who spent years arguing that American technology companies needed access to a much larger international labor pool is now suggesting that government may need to intervene to prevent technology companies from replacing human workers.

Perhaps Gates has changed his mind.

People are allowed to do that.

Perhaps artificial intelligence genuinely presents a labor-market threat fundamentally different from globalization, outsourcing or immigration.

There is considerable reason to believe that it does.

But skepticism is not unreasonable.

And Then There Is the Money Question

There is another question WPS News believes readers are entitled to ask:

Why now?

One possible cynical interpretation is that Gates has concluded that the economics of artificial intelligence are not developing the way he expected and is now discovering the virtues of restraint.

There is presently no evidence establishing that explanation.

In fact, the available evidence complicates it substantially. Microsoft remains deeply invested in artificial intelligence and maintains a major strategic and financial relationship with OpenAI. Microsoft’s latest annual filing says it continues making significant investments in AI products and services and remains entitled to revenue-sharing payments through its OpenAI partnership (Microsoft, 2026).

Gates himself is no longer running Microsoft day to day, so Microsoft’s corporate interests should not simply be treated as Gates’ personal financial interests.

Nevertheless, the question of incentives is legitimate.

When enormously wealthy technology figures warn society about technologies produced by the industry that made them enormously wealthy, journalists should examine both the warning and the interests surrounding the person delivering it.

That isn’t conspiracy theory.

That’s journalism.

Some of Gates’ Warnings Are Still Right

None of this means Gates is wrong about artificial intelligence.

He may be spectacularly right.

AI can automate cognitive work in a way earlier machinery generally could not. Gates specifically identifies law, medicine, customer service, software and manufacturing among the fields likely to experience disruption. He believes AI-driven robotics will eventually extend that disruption further into physical occupations (Gates, 2026).

He is also warning about AI-assisted cyberattacks, biological weapons, fraud and other deliberate misuse.

Those are real problems.

And Gates’ argument that society should consider protecting certain human occupations rather than blindly accepting every economically efficient automation deserves serious discussion.

But so does Gates’ record.

Technology Billionaires Don’t Suddenly Become Disinterested Observers

Silicon Valley has spent decades telling workers that disruption is progress.

Your factory closes? Progress.

Your job goes overseas? Progress.

Foreign labor can perform your job for less? Global competitiveness.

Software eliminates your department? Innovation.

An algorithm eliminates your profession?

Suddenly we’re discussing protecting human employment.

American information-technology professionals who lived through outsourcing, offshoring and the H-1B battles of the 1990s and 2000s could reasonably be forgiven for raising an eyebrow.

Bill Gates deserves to be heard.

He does not deserve to be heard without context.

The Warning May Be Correct Even If We Distrust the Messenger

That is ultimately where this story becomes more interesting than “Bill Gates says AI is dangerous.”

Artificial intelligence is potentially dangerous.

Massive employment displacement is possible. Cybersecurity threats are real. Biological misuse deserves serious government attention. Children probably should not be raised primarily by artificial companions. And governments are nowhere near adequately prepared for the economic transformation that increasingly capable machines could produce.

Gates may therefore be right about the problem.

But being right today does not erase yesterday.

His history of championing expanded access to foreign technology labor—and Microsoft’s history of shifting some American technical work overseas—belongs in any serious assessment of his newfound concern about protecting human workers.

And the possibility that economic interests influence the changing positions of billionaires should always be investigated rather than politely ignored.

We cannot presently establish that Gates is warning about AI because he has decided he cannot make enough money from it. The evidence does not support stating that as fact.

We can, however, ask the question.

We can examine his interests.

We can remember his history.

And we can refuse to accept either Silicon Valley’s AI evangelists or its newly worried elder statesmen as unquestionable authorities on what is best for everybody else.

The machines deserve scrutiny.

So do the men who built the industry that created them.

References

Fried, I. (2026, August 26). Bill Gates wants to keep some jobs off-limits to AI. Axios.

Gates, B. (2008, March 12). Written testimony before the Committee on Science and Technology, United States House of Representatives. U.S. House Committee on Science and Technology.

Gates, B. (2026, August 26). The turbulent AI era is here: The choices we make now are critical. Gates Notes.

Grassley, C. (2008, March 12). Grassley to Gates: Solution isn’t importing more foreign workers. United States Senate.

Gross, G. (2007, March 7). Gates: Tech needs more immigrant visas. InfoWorld.

Kessler, M. (2008, March 13). Bill Gates urges more visas for tech workers. USA Today.

Microsoft Corporation. (2026). Annual report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Wired. (2003, July 3). Microsoft cuts U.S. jobs. Wired.

Iran Warns US Tech Firms Could Become Targets As War Expands

Major US technology companies have been named as potential targets as the war between Iran, Israel and the…
#NewsBeep #News #BreakingNews #breakingnews #computing&software #Iran #politics&government #Security #technologyindustry #technologyproducts
https://www.newsbeep.com/429383/

CrowdStrike to acquire SGNL for $740M, expanding real-time identity security https://www.csoonline.com/article/4114957/crowdstrike-to-acquire-sgnl-for-740m-expanding-real-time-identity-security.html #ArtificialIntelligence #TechnologyIndustry #Security

Smartphone prices likely to rise in 2026 as AI strains memory supply

https://web.brid.gy/r/https://dailytimes.com.pk/1428358/smartphone-prices-likely-to-rise-in-2026-as-ai-strains-memory-supply/

Selling to the CISO: An open letter to the cybersecurity industry https://www.csoonline.com/article/4089738/selling-to-the-ciso-an-open-letter-to-the-cybersecurity-industry.html #DataandInformationSecurity #ApplicationSecurity #TechnologyIndustry #VendorManagement #NetworkSecurity #CSOandCISO #Security

Cisco fixes critical flaws in Unified Contact Center Express https://www.csoonline.com/article/4086396/cisco-fixes-critical-flaws-in-unified-contact-center-express.html #TechnologyIndustry #NetworkSecurity #Vulnerabilities #Security

10 promising cybersecurity startups CISOs should know about https://www.csoonline.com/article/4080699/10-promising-cybersecurity-startups-cisos-should-know-about.html #TechnologyIndustry #Business #Industry #Security #Startups #Markets

Amazon’s Anthropic investment boosts its quarterly profits by $9.5B - Amazon just opened Project Rainier, one of the world’s largest AI compute clusters, in... - https://www.geekwire.com/2025/amazons-anthropic-investment-boosts-its-quarterly-profits-by-9-5b/ #artificialintelligence #technologyindustry #aiinfrastructure #capitalspending #cloudcomputing #projectrainier #freecashflow #datacenters #anthropic #microsoft #earnings #amazon #airace #claude #google #openai #aws

Salesforce’s glaring Dreamforce omission: Vital security lessons from Salesloft Drift https://www.csoonline.com/article/4076024/dreamforce-finds-salesforce-weathering-a-security-storm.html #IdentityandAccessManagement #DataandInformationSecurity #SoftwareDevelopment #TechnologyIndustry #Authentication #AccessControl #CloudSecurity #Cyberattacks #Cybercrime #DataBreach #Industry #Security #Markets #APIs

Network security devices endanger orgs with ’90s era flaws https://www.csoonline.com/article/4074945/network-security-devices-endanger-orgs-with-90s-era-flaws.html #DataandInformationSecurity #ApplicationSecurity #EndpointProtection #TechnologyIndustry #NetworkSecurity #Vulnerabilities #DevSecOps #Industry #Security #Markets

Apple bumps RCE bug bounties to $2M to counter commercial spyware vendors https://www.csoonline.com/article/4071044/apple-bumps-rce-bug-bounties-to-2m-to-counter-commercial-spyware-vendors.html #ThreatandVulnerabilityManagement #TechnologyIndustry #MobileSecurity

SolarWinds fixes Web Help Desk patch bypass for actively exploited flaw — again https://www.csoonline.com/article/4061929/solarwinds-fixes-web-help-desk-patch-bypass-for-actively-exploited-flaw-again.html #TechnologyIndustry #Vulnerabilities

Where CISOs need to see Splunk go next https://www.csoonline.com/article/4058991/where-cisos-need-to-see-splunk-go-next.html #SecurityInformationandEventManagementSoftware #SecurityOperationsCenter #TechnologyIndustry #NetworkSecurity #Analytics

CrowdStrike bets big on agentic AI with new offerings after $290M Onum buy https://www.csoonline.com/article/4057472/crowdstrike-bets-big-on-agentic-ai-with-new-offerings-after-290m-onum-buy.html #SecurityOperationsCenter #ArtificialIntelligence #TechnologyIndustry

Microsoft restricts Chinese firms’ access to vulnerability warnings after hacking concerns – Source: www.csoonline.com https://ciso2ciso.com/microsoft-restricts-chinese-firms-access-to-vulnerability-warnings-after-hacking-concerns-source-www-csoonline-com/ #rssfeedpostgeneratorecho #TechnologyIndustry #CyberSecurityNews #vulnerabilities #CSOonline #CSOOnline #Security

Microsoft restricts Chinese firms’ access to vulnerability warnings after hacking concerns https://www.csoonline.com/article/4043683/microsoft-restricts-chinese-firms-access-to-vulnerability-warnings-after-hacking-concerns.html #TechnologyIndustry #Vulnerabilities #Security

Agentic AI promises a cybersecurity revolution — with asterisks – Source: www.csoonline.com https://ciso2ciso.com/agentic-ai-promises-a-cybersecurity-revolution-with-asterisks-source-www-csoonline-com/ #rssfeedpostgeneratorecho #SecurityOperationsCenter #ArtificialIntelligence #TechnologyIndustry #CyberSecurityNews #SecurityPractices #CSOonline #CSOOnline

Agentic AI promises a cybersecurity revolution — with asterisks https://www.csoonline.com/article/4040145/agentic-ai-promises-a-cybersecurity-revolution-with-asterisks.html #SecurityOperationsCenter #ArtificialIntelligence #TechnologyIndustry #SecurityPractices

Palo Alto kauft CyberArk – Source: www.csoonline.com https://ciso2ciso.com/palo-alto-kauft-cyberark-source-www-csoonline-com/ #rssfeedpostgeneratorecho #Mergersandacquisitions #TechnologyIndustry #CyberSecurityNews #CSOonline #CSOOnline

#SatyaNadella’s memo about #Microsoft’s 9,000-#employeelayoff reflects the broader #softwareindustry’s struggle with #AI-driven #disruption. This shift highlights the changing dynamics of the #technologyindustry, where #employeeloyalty is no longer guaranteed, and #profitability may justify #jobcuts. https://om.co/2025/07/26/the-satya-of-satyas-layoff-memo/?eicker.news #tech #media #news

Microsoft hints at revoking access to the Windows kernel — eventually https://www.csoonline.com/article/4014241/microsoft-hints-at-revoking-access-to-the-windows-kernel-eventually.html #TechnologyIndustry #WindowsSecurity

Pressure is mounting to cut jobs in favor of AI. Here’s why you shouldn’t. – Source: www.csoonline.com https://ciso2ciso.com/pressure-is-mounting-to-cut-jobs-in-favor-of-ai-heres-why-you-shouldnt-source-www-csoonline-com/ #rssfeedpostgeneratorecho #SecurityOperationsCenter #ArtificialIntelligence #TechnologyIndustry #CyberSecurityNews #StaffManagement #CSOonline #CSOOnline #ITJobs

CrowdStrike is cutting jobs in favor of AI. Here’s why you shouldn’t. https://www.csoonline.com/article/4012831/crowdstrike-is-cutting-jobs-in-favor-of-ai-heres-why-you-shouldnt.html #SecurityOperationsCenter #ArtificialIntelligence #TechnologyIndustry #StaffManagement #ITJobs

One hacker, many names: Industry collaboration aims to fix cyber threat label chaos https://www.csoonline.com/article/4000860/one-hacker-many-names-industry-collaboration-aims-to-fix-cyber-threat-label-chaos.html #TechnologyIndustry #Security

Researchers bypass Intel’s Spectre fixes — six years of CPUs at risk – Source: www.csoonline.com https://ciso2ciso.com/researchers-bypass-intels-spectre-fixes-six-years-of-cpus-at-risk-source-www-csoonline-com/ #rssfeedpostgeneratorecho #TechnologyIndustry #CyberSecurityNews #vulnerabilities #CSOonline #CSOOnline

Researchers bypass Intel’s Spectre fixes — six years of CPUs at risk https://www.csoonline.com/article/3984497/researchers-bypass-intels-spectre-fixes-six-years-of-cpus-at-risk.html #TechnologyIndustry #Vulnerabilities

Quantum supremacy: Cybersecurity’s ultimate arms race has China way in front – Source: www.csoonline.com https://ciso2ciso.com/quantum-supremacy-cybersecuritys-ultimate-arms-race-has-china-way-in-front-source-www-csoonline-com/ #rssfeedpostgeneratorecho #TechnologyIndustry #CyberSecurityNews #Encryption #CSOonline #CSOOnline #Security

Cybersecurity leaders decry ‘political persecution’ of Chris Krebs in a letter to the President https://www.csoonline.com/article/3973542/cybersecurity-leaders-decry-political-persecution-of-chris-krebs-in-a-letter-to-the-president.html #TechnologyIndustry #Security

Secure by Design is likely dead at CISA. Will the private sector make good on its pledge? https://www.csoonline.com/article/3971375/secure-by-design-is-likely-dead-at-cisa-will-the-private-sector-make-good-on-its-pledge.html #ApplicationSecurity #TechnologyIndustry #Government #Regulation