home.social

#greenlandicesheet — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #greenlandicesheet, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Scientists found something frozen inside Greenland that could rewrite climate history |

    Greenland’s ice sheet holds layered climate records stretching back thousands of years. Image Credits: Google Gemini Most people…
    #Conflict #Conflicts #War #climatechange #climatehistory #Danmark #denmark #Greenland #greenlandicesheet #icecorestudies #sealevelrise
    europesays.com/2977187/

  2. GREENLAND'S EDGE LAKES ACCELERATE ICE LOSS

    New research shows Greenland's freshwater lakes speed up ice loss by up to 40%. This could raise sea levels faster than expected. Find out how.

    #GreenlandIceSheet, #ClimateChange, #SeaLevelRise, #GlacierMelt, #ArcticNews

    newsletter.tf/greenland-lakes-

  3. Greenland thoughts from Antarctica..

    I’m in Antarctica and yet I have been getting contact from journalists because Greenland is all over the press at the moment for all the wrong reasons. It’s reasonable I think to worry about what the various deranged threats towards Greenland will mean for us all also outside of Greenland. But I also think about (and yes, worry) about the friends I’ve made in Greenland over the years. Let’s hope common sense prevails and we can step back from the brink, and concentrate on the really long term problems that we are still rapidly storing up for ourselves.

    Greenland is also on my mind, not just because of geopolitics, but also because the Copernicus Climate service has just put out their annual global climate highlights* for 2025 report with some disturbing results from Antarctica.

    A few months ago we had a paper published called the Greenlandification of Antarctica, in which we argue that the changes in the Antarctic cryosphere increasingly resemble those we have previously observed in Greenland and the Arctic. To see the future of Antarctica, look at Greenland.

    It’s been a busy time preparing for fieldwork and I didn’t manage to write anything here about it at the time, but this few eye-opening figure rather supports some of our arguments.

    In this graphic, the 2025 temperature over the Antarctic region was 1.06°C higher than the average between 1991 and 2020 (a temperature anomaly). This is actually higher than any other region except the Arctic, where the temperature anomaly was reported to be 1.37°C above the 30 year average (bear in mind also that between 1991 and 2020, the temperature was also much increasing, so we’re not comparing with a pre-industrial climate here). Polar amplification was predicted long ago and as those first experiments found, it also is seen more in the Arctic than the Antarctic – but these results are a first hint of the amplification that is perhaps appearing now and may come to stay in the Antarctic.

    In our paper we show the figure below (many thanks to illustrator Jagoba Malumbres-Olarta for the fine work), which shows five different cryosphere properties that are changing: 1) shrinking sea ice, 2) glacier velocities that show a seasonal cycle (mostly detected on the peninsula so far, though there are indications that Totten glacier for example has some kind of seasonal cycle, possibly modulated by sea ice), 3) total ice sheet mass loss, 4) ice shelf area and 5) annual mean surface temperature. In virtually all, the changes look very similar between Greenland and Antarctica, but with the crucial difference that the speed of changes is so far faster and more advanced in Greenland.

    From Mottram et al., 2025: The Greenlandification of Antarctica. Original caption:
    a, Commonalities include decline in sea ice extent from 1980 to 20232, with notable step-like changes in both poles. b, Seasonal glacier velocities are shown for two representative marine terminating glaciers, Kangilernata Sermia in Greenland13 and Hotine Glacier on the AP9, both now displaying similar seasonal dynamics. c, Both ice sheets show an accelerating total mass loss measured by GRACE satellites8d, Multi-sensor records of ice shelf area loss in Antarctica11 show a steeper decline than Greenland7 as Arctic ice shelves were largely lost in the pre-satellite era. e, Satellite records of annual mean ice sheet surface (skin) temperature for 1982 to 2021 from radiation data in the CLARA-A2.1 record processed by OSISAF2 over both ice sheets. Earth observation data allows us to generalize over the vast size and spatially varying trends of the ice sheets, where there is generally poor coverage of in situ data. Individual weather stations indicate warming trends in air temperatures over both ice sheets of ~0.61 °C per decade at the South Pole and ~1.7 °C per decade at Greenland coastal stations. Illustration by Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte

    The latter surface temperature plot is not the same as the Copernicus 2m air temperature which is based on the ERA5 reanalysis (so a blending of computer model with observations from satellites, weather stations, balloons, ships, planes etc). In our paper we wanted to focus on the contribution that satellite data has brought as we simply have so few direct in situ observations, so we used skin or surface temperature which is measured from satellites. It’s a somewhat theoretical construct, imagine a very thin surface (hence skin) layer, where incoming and outgoing energy are summed up to give a temperature. This is calculated over both ice sheets and sea surface by our colleagues in the satellite group at DMI and this is the dataset we used here. Their results which stretch back to the 1980s show a slow upward trend in Antarctica and a steeper change in Greenland, the record stopped in 2021 in our paper but it actually shows an upward increase since and that’s also borne out by the Copernicus results. In climate and weather models we in fact first calculate the skin temperature and then back interpolate to 2m temperature, so the two are very closely related.

    To check that the satellite skin temperature record was accurate, I also looked at some of the longer in situ records, the South pole station for example has a long record and shows a small increasing trend over the last 30 years or so (which also may be attributable to natural causes, it is hard to pick out the global warming trend). Analysis of the record also shows that it is largely due to decreasing cold extremes rather than necessarily higher warm extremes. Again, a pattern we also observe in the Arctic.

    Shallow snow cores drilled near Wasa, the clear layers are refrozen surface melt that has percolated into the snow below the surface. I was genuinely not expecting to see these, and it’s not always captured in the satellite record either, so we clearly have work to do to explain some of these findings.

    The analogy is not exact. As a continent, Antarctica is much further south than Greenland is to the north and it is much more insulated from warming by the circumpolar ocean than the Greenland ice sheet, sticking out in the middle of the Atlantic is. In a very real sense then, geography is destiny. Surface melt, which is also not nearly as common here in Antarctica mostly refreezes in the snowpack, whereas in the lower parts of Greenland it generally runs off and contributes directly to sea level rise. That has not yet become a major process in Antarctica, it’s still colder here and there is less surface melt for now, although from our own observations in the field, much more than I’d expected. Surface melt is definitely something we need to keep an eye on and some of our observations show how tricky that is, especially given disagreements between satellite sensors on this point .

    But these are all details, the point is that Antarctica is also part of the global climate system and the same processes we’ve been observing for more than three decades in Greenland are now also starting to become apparent here too.

    In one other respect Antarctica is becoming more similar to Greenland – it is becoming more contested. The Treaty that has governed Antarctica is vulnerable and subject to the same weakening of the global order that is now playing out in the North.

    Let’s hope that geopolitics can settle down soon so that we can start to tackle the more serious and longer term crises coming down the line.

    Lifted with thanks from Mackay Cartoons

    *I’m not sure “highlights” is quite the right word either – maybe “lowlights” would be better, but then it also starts to sound like a report on hairstyles…

    #Antarctica #climate #climateChange #environment #globalWarming #Greenland #GreenlandIceSheet #iceSheet #Science

  4. Guest post: How the Greenland ice sheet fared in 2025

    Greenland is closing in on three decades of continuous annual ice loss, with 1995-96 being the last year…
    #NewsBeep #News #Environment #AU #Australia #Greenland #GreenlandIceSheet #ice #icemelt #icesheets #melting #Science #snow #snowmelt
    newsbeep.com/au/352790/

  5. Guest post: How the Greenland ice sheet fared in 2025

    Greenland is closing in on three decades of continuous annual ice loss, with 1995-96 being the last year…
    #NewsBeep #News #Environment #CA #Canada #Greenland #GreenlandIceSheet #ice #IceMelt #IceSheets #melting #Science #snow #snowmelt
    newsbeep.com/ca/349287/

  6. Scientists issue warning after uncovering alarming data from mountain summit — here’s what you need to know

    Researchers were shocked to discover that a weather station at the top of the Greenland ice sheet had…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Environment #Arcticseaice #Greenland #Greenlandicesheet #icesheet #Science #Sealevelrise
    newsbeep.com/us/66575/

  7. PROTECT: The Sea Level Rise Question

    There is currently some discussion in the Danish media about sea level rise hazards and the risk of rapid changes that may or may not be on the horizon. Some of the discussion is about IPCC estimates. That’s a little unfortunate and in fact a bit unfair as the IPCC report has not been updated since 2021, nor was it intended to have been. In the mean time there has been a lot of additional science to clear up some of the ambiguities and questions left from the last report.

    I’ve been working quite a bit on the cryosphere part of the sea level question of late, so thought I’d share some insights from the latest research into the debate at this point. And I have a pretty specific viewpoint here, because I’ve been working with the datasets, models, climate outputs etc that will likely go into the next IPCC report as part of a couple of EU funded projects. As part of that, we have prepared a policy briefing that will be presented to the European Parliament in June this year, but it’s already online now and will no doubt cross your socials later this week. I’m going to put in some highlights into this post too.

    Now, I want to be really clear that everything I say in this post can be backed up with peer reviewed science, most of which have been published in the last 2 to 3 years. Let’s start with the summary:.:

    • The sea is rising. And the rate of rise is currently accelerating.
    • The sea will continue to rise long into the future.
    • The rate of that sea level rise is largely in our society’s hands, given that it is strongly related to greenhouse gas emissions.
    • We have already committed to at least 2m of sea level rise by 2300.
    • By the end of 2100 most small glaciers and ice caps will be gone, mountain glaciers will contribute 20-24% of total sea-level rise under varying emission scenarios.
    • Antarctic and Greenland ice sheet mass loss will contribute significantly to sea-level rise for centuries, even under low emissions scenarios
    • Abrupt sea level rise on the order of metres in a few decades is not credible given new understanding of key ice processes.
    • By the end of this century we expect on the order of a half to one metre of sea level rise around Denmark, depending on emissions pathway.
    • Your local sea level rise is not the same as the global average and some areas, primarily those at lower latitudes will experience higher total sea level rise and earlier than in regions at higher latitudes.
    • We have created a local sea level rise tool. You should still check your local coastal services provider, they will certainly have something tailor made for your local coastline (or they *should*!), but for something more updated than the IPCC, with latest SLR data, this is the one to check.

    Sea level rise now is ~5mm per year averaged over the last 5 years, 10 years ago it was about 3 mm per year). Much of that sea level rise comes from melting ice, particularly the small glaciers and ice caps that are melting very fast indeed right now. Even under lower levels of emissions, those losses will increase. There won’t be many left by the end of this century.

    Greenland is the largest single contributor and adds just less than a millimetre of sea level rise per year, with Antarctica contributing around a third of Greenland, primarily from the Amundsen Sea sector. The remaining sea level rise comes from thermal expansion of the oceans. Our work shows very clearly that the emissions pathway we follow as a human society will determine the ultimate sea level rise, but also how fast that will be achieved. The less we burn, the lower and slower the rise. But even under a low-end Paris scenario, we expect around 1 metre of sea level by 2300.

    The long tail of sea level rise will come from Antarctica, where the ocean is accelerating melt of, in particular, West Antarctica. However, our recent work and that of other ice sheet groups shows that the risk of multi-metre sea level rise within a few decades is unrealistic. Again, to be very clear: We can’t rule out multiple metres of sea level rise, but it will happen on a timescale of centuries rather than years. High emissions pathways make multiple metres of sea level rise more likely. In fact, our results show that even under low emissions pathways, we may still be committed to losing some parts of especially West Antarctica, but it will still take a long-time for the Antarctic ice sheet to disintegrate. We have time to prepare our coastlines.

    Greenland is losing ice much faster than Antarctica, and here atmospheric processes and firn and snow are more important than the ocean and these are also where the læarge uncertainties are. As I’ve written about before, that protective layer of compressed snow and ice will determine how quickly Greenland melts, as it is lost, the ice sheet will accelerate it’s contribution to sea level. This is a process that is included in our estimates.

    There’s so much more I could write, but that’s supposed to be the high level summary. Feel free to shoot me questions in the comment feeds. I’ll do my best to answer them.

    Five years ago, a small group of European scientists got together to do something really ambitious: work out how quickly and how far the sea will rise, both locally and on average worldwide, from the melting of glaciers and ice sheets. The PROTECT project was the first EU funded project in 10 years to really grapple with the state-of-the-art in ice sheet and glacier melt and the implications for sea level rise and to really seek to understand what is the problem, what are the uncertainties, what can we do about it.

    We were and are a group of climate scientists, glaciologists, remote sensors, ice sheet modellers, atmospheric and ocean physicists, professors, statisticians, students, coastal adaptation specialists, social scientists and geodesists, stakeholders and policymakers. We’ve produced more than 155 scientific papers in the last 5 years (with more on the way) and now our findings are summarised in our new policy briefing for the European Parliament.

    It’s been a formative, exhilarating and occasionally tough experience doing big science in the Horizon 2020 framework, but we’ve genuinely made some big steps forward, including new estimates of rates of ice sheet and glacier loss, a better understanding of some key processes, particularly calving and the influence of the ocean on the loss of ice shelves. More importantly for human societies, by integrating the social scientists into the project, we have had a very clear focus on how to consider sea level rise, not just as a scientific ice sheet process problem, but also how to integrate the findings into usable and workable information. In Denmark, we will start to use these inputs already in updating the Danish Climate Atlas. If you are elsewhere in the world, you may want to check out our sea level rise tool, that shows how the emissions pathway we follow, will affect your local sea level rise.

    Our final recommendations?

    1. Accelerate emission reductions to follow the lower emission scenario to limit
      cryosphere loss and associated sea-level rise
    2. Enhance monitoring of glaciers and ice sheets to refine models and predictions
    3. Support the long-term development of ice sheet models, their integration into
      climate models, and the coupling of glacier models with hydrological models, while
      promoting education and training to build expertise in these areas
    4. Invest in flexible and localized coastal management that incorporates
      uncertainty and long-term projections
    5. Foster international collaboration to share knowledge, resources, and strategies
      for mitigating and adapting to global impacts

    #Antarctica #climate #climateChange #DMI #environment #glaciers #globalWarming #GreenlandIceSheet #Science #seaLevelRise

  8. Looking backwards…

    This is the first in a two-parter. At this time of year, posts making bold statements about what happened last year and what we plan to do this year start to become prominent. The last few years I have spent a few hours in the first week of January reviewing what worked, what was fun and what was cool, what was awful and what definitely was a waste of time. I’m not honestly sure that any of this is of interest to anyone except me, so read on, but you have been warned..

    2024: Themes of this year: Greenland, Machine Learning, people, and big data…

    I visited the world’s largest island 3 times this year – a rather unprecedented number of times for me, with fieldwork in April (it was very cold and there was a lot of snow) to continue a soon to be submitted for publication set of observations in the melange zone and then to establish a new snow observation site.

    View from Qaanaaq at evening in early April 2024.

    In late May and early June, after a slightly longer than expected stop in Ilulissat, we made it to bring in the instruments before the sea ice break-up and happily my new snow observations seem to be working. Now I just need to do set-up the data processing chain, which will be 2025’s paying myself first.

    Working with scientists from the Greenland natural resources institute and local hunters on the sea ice.

    The final trip was in October for a workshop with scientists in Greenland about climate change impacts in Greenland, the subpolar gyre and AMOC for the UN Ocean decade. It was a memorable meeting for the sheer range and quality of science presented as well as for being stranded in Nuuk by a broken aeroplane in quite ridiculously beautiful weather (I mostly stayed in my hotel room to write the aforementioned paper, sadly. In 2025 I will work on my priorities) .

    Apart from fieldwork I have really tried hard on publications this year. I have (like many scientists I suspect), far more data sitting around on hard drives than I have published. It’s a waste and it’s also fun to work on actual data instead of endless emails. This is something I intend to continue focusing on the next few years as well. There is gold in them thar computers…

    We had a couple of writing retreats were very successful. These I plan to continue also and the PRECISE project grant is happily flexible enough to do this. I probably achieve as much in terms of data processing and paper writing in 3 focused days as I would in 3 months in the office. It paid off too. I managed to co-author 8 papers published this year (including my first 1st-author paper in ages – a workshop report, but nevertheless it counts.). Some of these are still preprints, so will change, and there are a couple more that have been submitted but are not yet available as preprints. I will submit two more papers in the next 3 weeks as well (1 first author), so January 2025 is going to be the 13th month of 2024 in my mind.

    Bootcamps have been a theme the last 3 years, I organised the first in 2022 and so far there have been 4 publications from that first effort. There was another this year in June, ( I have attended them in 2023 and 2024 but was not organising) where we really got going on a project for ESA that I have had my eye on for a while – I hope the publication from that will be ready in the Spring this coming year.

    Machine Learning: This was the year I really got machine learning. I’ve been following a graduate course online, and learning from my colleagues and students about implementations. I understand a lot more about the architecture and how to in practice apply neural networks and other techniques like random forests now. This is not before time, as we intend to implement these to contribute to CMIP7 and the next IPCC report. We still have a lot of work to do, but the foundation is laid. And it’s been fun to learn something that, if not exactly new, is a new application of something. In fact the biggest barrier has really been learning new terminology. We have also been fortunate that Eumetsat and the ECMWF have been very helpful in providing us with ML-optimised computer resources to test much of these new models out on. We’re actually running out of resources a bit though, so it’s time to start investigating Lumi, Leonardo and the new Danish centre Gefion to see what we can get out of these.

    People: This year our research group has grown with another 2 PhD students, and at the end of the year we also employed a new post-doc. I think it’s large enough now. I’m very aware that if I don’t do my job properly, then not only the research but the people will suffer, so developing people management skills is really important. In any case it’s extremely stimulating to work with such talented young people and I’m really excited to see where the science will take us, given the skills in the team. I hope I have been good enough at managing such a large and young team, but I have my doubts. A focus for 2025 for sure.

    Data: This has been the year of big data, not necessarily just for ML purposes but also in the PolarRES project the production and management of an enormous set of future climate projections at very high resolution. More on this anon. Suffice to say, it has taken a lot of my time and mental energy and it’s probably not the most exciting thing to talk about, but we now have 800 Tb of climate simulation data to dig into. I suspect that rewards of this will be coming for years. There has also been a lot of digging into satellite datasets and the bringing together of the two has been very rewarding already. It’s a rich seam, to continue the metaphor, that will be producing scientific gold for many years.

    Projects: we have gone in the final year of two projects, PROTECT and PolarRES, both of which will finally end in 2025. We also arrived at the half way point of OCEAN:ICE. So rather than being a year of starts, it has been a year where we have started to prepare for endings – actually this is a fun part of many projects where a lot of the grunt work is out the way and we can start to see what we have actually found out. It can also be a slog of confusing data, writing and editing papers and dealing with h co-author comments. I’ve definitely been in that process this year, hopefully with some of the outputs to come next year…

    Proposals: I started 2024 writing a proposal. Colleagues were in 3 different consortia for the same call, alas ours didn’t get funded, but 2 of the others did and will start this year. That is a good result for DMI and our group. I wrote another proposal in the Autumn and contributed to a 4th and finally at the end of the year I heard that both will *likely* be funded (but are currently embargoed and in negotiation, so no more will be said now). It sometimes feels that spending so much time and energy on proposal writing is putting the cart before the horse, but in fact I find proposal writing something akin to brainstorming. It’s essential of course to ensure we can continue to do the science we want, but it can also help us to clarify our ideas and make sure we’re not on the wrong track. It’s also a good way to keep track of what the funders are actually wanting to know and to help us focus on policy relevance.

    There was also an incredible number of meetings, reports, milestones and deliverables, but you probably don’t want to hear about that…

    Also missing from this summary is personal life, and, well that is not for sharing publically, but suffice to say, I learnt about raising teenagers, I also had some very good times with friends and family, to all of whom I immensely grateful for being a part of my voyages around the sun.

    Anyway, reading all that back, I’m not surprised I ended the year exhausted! I am not planning on quite such a slog in future. I should probably pace myself a bit more this year, the plans for which will be the subject of next week’s post.

    #climateChange #DMI #fieldwork #Greenland #GreenlandIceSheet #Science

  9. My ace colleague from Copenhagen University, and PI on #PRECISE Christine Hvidberg presenting some new insights from GPS at the #IceCore sites on #GreenlandIceSheet dynamics at #IGSnorthumbria2024

  10. Now on to Mikkel Lauritzen who is presenting the Holocene history of the #GreenlandIceSheet - also associated with our #PRECISEnnf project

  11. If my posts on @PolarRES have whetted your appetite for #polarScience and you're interested in doing a #PhD in #GreenlandIceSheet processes, a brief reminder that you have 4 days to get your application in for this awesome project with me @dmidk Adreas Ahlstrøm at #GEUS and Peter Langen at @AarhusUni

    *Deadline 5th October*

    phd.tech.au.dk/for-applicants/

  12. A Saturday reminder, if you're interested in doing a #PhD in #GreenlandIceSheet melt and other #ice processes: involving #ML techniques, #ClimateModelling and on-site #glaciology, have a look at our open position announcement. Deadline 5th October!

    Come and join us in #Copenhagen...

    fediscience.org/@Ruth_Mottram/

  13. Headed to Greenland for fieldwork and teaching. First to Ilulissat to join a Climate Narratives team at #Illu Art and Science Hub. One goal there is to build a sea level and tides monitoring station using GNSS-IR and an array of low-cost GPS antennas. @BillMinarik and EPS #McGill alum Dave Purnell have been helping me get ready. And next week, #ACDCsummerschool has teamed up with #GRISO for a graduate school on the #GreenlandIceSheet at Disko Island research station. More soon.

  14. "#IceSheets are littered with millions of tiny hairline cracks that are forced open by the #meltwater from the rivers and streams that intercept them.

    As the water pours in, it damages the ice sheet structure and releases its latent heat. The ice fabric warms and softens and, hence, flows and #melts faster, just like warmed-up candle wax."

    #GreenlandIceSheet
    theconversation.com/meltwater-

  15. "Meltwater is hydro-fracking Greenland's ice sheet, destabilizing its internal structure" - Glaciologist Alan Hubbard, in the field for 35 years, writes a superb, readable summary of what's really happening in #Greenland and #Antarctica, and why it is far more frightening than what the #IPCC admits. Article also has excellent links.
    ...
    "Current climate models lowball the risks - Along with other applied glaciologists, "structured expert judgment" and a few candid modelers, I contend that the current generation of ice sheet models used to inform the IPCC are not capturing the abrupt changes being observed in Greenland and Antarctica, or the risks that lie ahead."
    ...
    "This is a tragedy in the making for the half a billion people who populate vulnerable coastal regions, since the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are effectively giant frozen freshwater reservoirs locking up in excess of 65 meters (over 200 feet) of equivalent global sea level rise. Since the 1990s their mass loss has been accelerating, becoming both the primary contributor to and the wild card in future sea level rise."
    ...
    "...new research into the ice sheet's mechanics are challenging traditional thinking about what happens inside and under ice sheets, where observations are extremely challenging yet have stark implications. They suggest that Earth's remaining ice sheets in #Greenland and #Antarctica are far more vulnerable to #climate warming than models predict, and that the ice sheets may be destabilizing from inside."

    phys.org/news/2023-06-meltwate

    #ClimateCrisis #GIS #GreenlandIceSheet #GlobalWarming #Klimakrise #Klima #Antarctica #IceSheets #Glaciers #GlacialMelt #ClimateModelling #ClimateModels

  16. Hello #Fediverse !
    An #Introduction post from the scientists behind the #PolarPortal - a danish collaboration between the Danish Meteorological Institute, the Danish Technical University and GEUS with accurate near real-time #Climate data on the state of the #cryosphere in the #Arctic.
    Follow us for data + visualisations of #ArcticSeaIce #Weather #GreenlandIceSheet #SMB and #GRACE / #GRACEFO mass budget as well as #permafrost +#Iceberg processes

    @greenlandicesheet

    polarportal.dk/en/home/

  17. Colleague at the Danish #GreenlandIceSheet seminar points out that #FediScience can be read in Danish as "Fed I" Science - a danglicism that could be interpreted as either "fat in science" or "Cool in science" (as in that's really cool science!)

    I know which interpretation I prefer...
    #Dkmastodon #mastodonDK
    #DKviden

  18. Colleague at the Danish #GreenlandIceSheet seminar points out that #FediScience can be read in Danish as "Fed I" Science - a danglicism that could be interpreted as either "fat in science" or "Cool in science" (as in that's really cool science!)

    I know which interpretation I prefer...
    #Dkmastodon #mastodonDK
    #DKviden

  19. Colleague at the Danish #GreenlandIceSheet seminar points out that #FediScience can be read in Danish as "Fed I" Science - a danglicism that could be interpreted as either "fat in science" or "Cool in science" (as in that's really cool science!)

    I know which interpretation I prefer...
    #Dkmastodon #mastodonDK
    #DKviden

  20. Colleague at the Danish #GreenlandIceSheet seminar points out that #FediScience can be read in Danish as "Fed I" Science - a danglicism that could be interpreted as either "fat in science" or "Cool in science" (as in that's really cool science!)

    I know which interpretation I prefer...
    #Dkmastodon #mastodonDK
    #DKviden

  21. Colleague at the Danish #GreenlandIceSheet seminar points out that #FediScience can be read in Danish as "Fed I" Science - a danglicism that could be interpreted as either "fat in science" or "Cool in science" (as in that's really cool science!)

    I know which interpretation I prefer...
    #Dkmastodon #mastodonDK
    #DKviden

  22. Fascinating talk from J P Steffensen of #nielsBohrInstitute on the ravages that a 2 year #COVID19 gap in visits to #EGRIPcamp.

    The #icecore science trenches needed completely reconstructing, it took 2.mobths to dig out the camp, all done by hand!
    Amazingly they even managed to start taking #EGRIP ice core again...
    #DKviden #GreenlandIceSheet

  23. Fascinating talk from J P Steffensen of #nielsBohrInstitute on the ravages that a 2 year #COVID19 gap in visits to #EGRIPcamp.

    The #icecore science trenches needed completely reconstructing, it took 2.mobths to dig out the camp, all done by hand!
    Amazingly they even managed to start taking #EGRIP ice core again...
    #DKviden #GreenlandIceSheet

  24. Fascinating talk from J P Steffensen of #nielsBohrInstitute on the ravages that a 2 year #COVID19 gap in visits to #EGRIPcamp.

    The #icecore science trenches needed completely reconstructing, it took 2.mobths to dig out the camp, all done by hand!
    Amazingly they even managed to start taking #EGRIP ice core again...
    #DKviden #GreenlandIceSheet

  25. Fascinating talk from J P Steffensen of #nielsBohrInstitute on the ravages that a 2 year #COVID19 gap in visits to #EGRIPcamp.

    The #icecore science trenches needed completely reconstructing, it took 2.mobths to dig out the camp, all done by hand!
    Amazingly they even managed to start taking #EGRIP ice core again...
    #DKviden #GreenlandIceSheet

  26. Fascinating talk from J P Steffensen of #nielsBohrInstitute on the ravages that a 2 year #COVID19 gap in visits to #EGRIPcamp.

    The #icecore science trenches needed completely reconstructing, it took 2.mobths to dig out the camp, all done by hand!
    Amazingly they even managed to start taking #EGRIP ice core again...
    #DKviden #GreenlandIceSheet

  27. Good morning all. It's the first Thursday after New Year which means it's time to hop on the bike for a trip to our friends at the Danish Technical University #DTU for the annual danish #GreenlandIceSheet seminar.

    Always exciting to hear what other institutes are working on with regard to #IceSheet processes.

    #DKviden #dkMastodon #MastodonDK

  28. Good morning all. It's the first Thursday after New Year which means it's time to hop on the bike for a trip to our friends at the Danish Technical University #DTU for the annual danish #GreenlandIceSheet seminar.

    Always exciting to hear what other institutes are working on with regard to #IceSheet processes.

    #DKviden #dkMastodon #MastodonDK

  29. Good morning all. It's the first Thursday after New Year which means it's time to hop on the bike for a trip to our friends at the Danish Technical University #DTU for the annual danish #GreenlandIceSheet seminar.

    Always exciting to hear what other institutes are working on with regard to #IceSheet processes.

    #DKviden #dkMastodon #MastodonDK

  30. Good morning all. It's the first Thursday after New Year which means it's time to hop on the bike for a trip to our friends at the Danish Technical University #DTU for the annual danish #GreenlandIceSheet seminar.

    Always exciting to hear what other institutes are working on with regard to #IceSheet processes.

    #DKviden #dkMastodon #MastodonDK

  31. Good morning all. It's the first Thursday after New Year which means it's time to hop on the bike for a trip to our friends at the Danish Technical University #DTU for the annual danish #GreenlandIceSheet seminar.

    Always exciting to hear what other institutes are working on with regard to #IceSheet processes.

    #DKviden #dkMastodon #MastodonDK

  32. I guess an implication of this might be that increasing melt and hence subglacial disposal will contribute to increased seasonal acceleration?

    Sady, #NotOpenAccess.

    'Seasonal acceleration of Petermann Glacier, Greenland, from changes in subglacial hydrology'

    agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.co

    #GlacialHydrology
    #PetermannGlacier
    #Cryosphere
    #GreenlandIceSheet

  33. Danish #Greenland ice sheet seminar will be on 5th January, organised by Kirk Scanlan at DTU-Space.

    #GreenlandIceSheet #AntarcticIceSheet

  34. The #WorldMeteorologicalOrganization published the provisional #StateOfTheClimate 2022 a few days ago. I have contributed with mass balance data from the #GreenlandIceSheet based on Mankoff et al. (doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5001-2), of which I am a co-author.